EP3036727B1 - Stationary device for reducing the risk of a collision between motor vehicles - Google Patents
Stationary device for reducing the risk of a collision between motor vehicles Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3036727B1 EP3036727B1 EP14744467.3A EP14744467A EP3036727B1 EP 3036727 B1 EP3036727 B1 EP 3036727B1 EP 14744467 A EP14744467 A EP 14744467A EP 3036727 B1 EP3036727 B1 EP 3036727B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- speed profile
- vehicle
- setpoint speed
- approaching
- warning signal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 26
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007175 bidirectional communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010972 statistical evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/01—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
- G08G1/052—Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled with provision for determining speed or overspeed
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
- G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
- G08G1/0967—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits
- G08G1/096733—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where a selection of the information might take place
- G08G1/096741—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where a selection of the information might take place where the source of the transmitted information selects which information to transmit to each vehicle
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G1/00—Traffic control systems for road vehicles
- G08G1/09—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
- G08G1/0962—Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
- G08G1/0967—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits
- G08G1/096766—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission
- G08G1/096783—Systems involving transmission of highway information, e.g. weather, speed limits where the system is characterised by the origin of the information transmission where the origin of the information is a roadside individual element
Definitions
- the invention relates to a stationary device for reducing the risk of collision of motor vehicles.
- intersections The approach of a motor vehicle to an intersection and the crossing of the intersection is subject to a higher risk, especially if other vehicles or other road users exist. Often, accidents happen due to non-observance of vehicles entitled to drive. An example of this is an intersection with a right of way grant road sign. The same applies to intersections where the rule on the right is to the left and intersections that have a stop sign or a traffic light.
- driver assistance systems In order to assist the driver, driver assistance systems have already been proposed, which in most cases are based on camera-based monitoring of the surroundings and in the event of a recognized dangerous situation emit a warning signal or intervene in the vehicle control, eg. B. by triggering a braking operation. From the DE-A1-102011106828 a stationary device is known which emits guideway information to approaching vehicles.
- a motor vehicle with a collision avoidance system is known from DE 10 2010 033 008 A1 known.
- an optical and / or acoustic warning is triggered, at a second time Partial braking is initiated when the speed of the motor vehicle is within a predetermined speed range.
- a device for assisting the driver when crossing traffic intersections is known from DE 10 2005 020 429 A1 known.
- the device takes into account environmental information and determines a driving movement to allow crossing a traffic intersection.
- a warning is issued in the event of imminent danger.
- intersection traffic exists, the driver must reduce his speed and stop if necessary and let the intersection traffic pass before he can enter the intersection. This applies to cases when the driver is not privileged, that is, when there is a right of turn sign or stop sign in his lane, or when the right-to-left rule is at the intersection.
- the situation is relevant if there is no intersection traffic.
- the driver usually approaches the intersection at a higher speed than in the first case and can enter directly into the intersection, at least if there is a right of way sign posted there or if the right is left to the left.
- a dangerous situation that could lead to a collision can thus be detected by observing driver behavior on the one hand and using vehicle sensors to determine whether other road users are approaching the intersection with which the vehicle could potentially collide. In this case, it can be concluded that there is a driving error, so that the driver can be warned, if necessary, an intervention in the vehicle control can be made, for. B. by triggering an automatic emergency braking.
- the invention is therefore an object of the invention to provide a fixed device for reducing the risk of collision of vehicles, which can be used for any intersections.
- a fixed device of the type mentioned at the outset it comprises the following features: at least one sensor for monitoring at least two lanes in the area of an intersection and for detecting approaching vehicles, a memory in which at least one The setpoint speed profile assigned to the device is stored, the device being designed to wirelessly transmit at least one information concerning the setpoint speed profile by means of a transmission device that can be received by a vehicle approaching the device.
- the invention is based on the idea of equipping intersections with at least one sensor, preferably a plurality of sensors, in order to monitor at least two lanes, preferably all lanes leading to the intersection.
- the device transmits information relating to a desired speed profile that can be received by the vehicle approaching the device.
- the vehicle has for this purpose a corresponding receiving device.
- the information transmitted by the transmitting device is transmitted wirelessly, that is by radio, by means of a suitable radio standard.
- the stationary device has a memory in which one or more of the device, that is the junction, associated desired speed profiles are stored.
- the device has an evaluation unit which is designed to compare the actual speed profile of the approaching vehicle with the at least one desired speed profile and a deviation between the actual speed profile and the To detect desired speed profile and output when exceeding a threshold for the deviation of a warning signal by means of the transmitting device.
- the evaluation unit is part of the stationary device, so that the evaluation of the information supplied by the sensors is performed by the stationary device.
- a vehicle approaching the stationary device is detected, in particular an actual speed profile of the approaching vehicle is detected. This actual velocity profile is compared with a desired velocity profile.
- a warning signal is output by means of the transmitter of the stationary device, this warning signal can be received by the vehicle, so that the warning signal can be output to the driver.
- This variant has the advantage that no evaluation unit is required on the vehicle side. The vehicle only needs to be able to receive warning signals and output to the driver.
- the sensors are designed as radar sensors or ultrasound sensors or as optical sensors.
- a combination of different types of sensors may be provided.
- the sensors can be arranged so that individual lanes are specifically monitored, for example, those lanes that lead to the intersection.
- the device according to the invention can be operated in a learning mode in which speed profiles of approaching vehicles can be detected in order to set or update a desired speed profile.
- the operation of the device in the learning mode may be after the installation of the device take place, if no desired speed profiles are stored in the memory.
- target velocity profile can be z. B. by a statistical evaluation of many speed profiles are created from which average values and deviations can be determined up and down. It is essential that target speed profiles are determined for two cases, namely on the one hand for the case when there is no intersection traffic, and on the other hand for the case when approaching one or more other vehicles of the stationary device or the intersection.
- the evaluation unit is designed to output the warning signal only when at least two vehicles approach the device at the same time. This means that at least one other vehicle is in the vicinity, so that it may possibly lead to a collision. On the other hand, if only one vehicle can be determined in the vicinity of the stationary device or in the vicinity of the intersection, no warning signal is output because there is no danger of collision between vehicles.
- the warning signal can be transmitted wirelessly, in particular via WLAN, UMTS or Bluetooth.
- any other suitable frequency or a suitable transmission method can be used, for which a corresponding receiver is present in the vehicle.
- the warning signal can be emitted in an undirected manner to approaching vehicles. This variant has the advantage that no bidirectional communication between the stationary device and a particular motor vehicle has to be established. Instead, the warning signal is sent out undirected, so that it can be received by all approaching vehicles that are equipped with a corresponding receiving device.
- a warning signal can be emitted directed to an approaching vehicle. This results in the advantage that only a specific vehicle or a particular driver who is in a dangerous situation, is warned without it comes to a faulty warning or a false alarm in a vehicle that is not in a dangerous situation ,
- the deviation of the actual speed from the desired speed is defined as absolute deviation or as relative deviation.
- an absolute deviation may be defined as a speed corridor, e.g. B. covers a range of ⁇ 5 km / h to the target speed.
- a relative deviation may be defined by the definition of a percentage deviation, e.g. b. a range of - 10% to + 10%, based on the target speed.
- the device according to the invention can also be extended to store in the memory a plurality of desired speed profiles in which at least one of the following influencing factors is taken into account: time of day, season, brightness, road conditions, weather conditions, in particular rain, snow, black ice.
- a suitable target speed profile is selected, which is used for the evaluation by the evaluation unit. This makes it possible to consider the influence of changing environmental conditions on driving behavior.
- the motor vehicle according to the invention is characterized in that the receiving device is designed to receive a warning signal which can be optically and / or acoustically and / or haptically output in the vehicle and / or by which an action can be triggered automatically.
- a warning signal which can be optically and / or acoustically and / or haptically output in the vehicle and / or by which an action can be triggered automatically.
- a target speed profile information can be received, which, optionally after an evaluation, are output in the form of a warning signal so that they can be perceived by the driver.
- a brake actuation or an intervention in the accelerator pedal actuation can be triggered after receiving a warning signal.
- further actions can be taken, for example, brake lights could be activated, the same applies to the headlights of the motor vehicle to warn by these optical signals other road users.
- the invention relates to a motor vehicle with a receiving device for wirelessly transmitted security-related information.
- the receiving device is designed to receive desired speed profiles which are transmitted by a stationary device.
- the difference between the motor vehicle described above is that the evaluation of the desired speed profiles and the detection of a deviation on the vehicle side. In the case of the motor vehicle described above, this evaluation takes place in an evaluation unit which is assigned to the stationary device. The stationary device then sends only warning signals.
- the motor vehicle according to the invention has an evaluation unit which is designed to have at least one desired speed profile to compare with an actual speed profile and to detect a deviation and to trigger an action when exceeding a limit value for the deviation.
- the actual velocity profile results from known current state data.
- the triggering of the action may include the issuing of a warning signal and / or a brake application and / or an intervention in the accelerator pedal operation and / or in the vehicle steering system and / or the vehicle control system.
- Fig. 1 shows a fixed device 1, which is installed at an intersection 2.
- the intersection 2 is shown in a plan view.
- the stationary device 1 is located near intersecting roadways 3, 4, it can also be integrated in a traffic light or installed next to a traffic light.
- the stationary device 1 for reducing the risk of collision of vehicles has sensors which cover the lanes 3, 4, so that motor vehicles approaching from all four directions of the intersection 2 can be detected.
- the sensors are designed to monitor the lanes of the lanes 3, 4, that is, in an approaching vehicle, both its path and its speed are detected. By taking into account the time course, an acceleration or deceleration of an approaching vehicle can additionally be detected.
- the stationary device 1 has a memory in which a desired speed profile is stored. This desired speed profile is specially adapted to this stationary device 1. In a previous learning mode, speed profiles of approaching vehicles have been recorded, and the desired speed profile has been derived therefrom by statistical methods.
- Fig. 2 shows qualitatively the desired speed profile, wherein on the horizontal axis the distance a to a stop line 5 and on the vertical axis the target speed is plotted.
- the speed of a vehicle decreases until the vehicle has come to a halt shortly before reaching the stop line. Then the speed increases again.
- an evaluation unit is provided which is capable of the actual speed profile a vehicle 6 with the in Fig. 2 compare target speed profile 7 shown.
- Fig. 2 is the actual speed profile of the intersection 2 approaching vehicle 6 shown in dashed lines.
- the curve of the actual speed profile 8 is below the curve of the target speed profile 7. This means that the driver is behaving properly, in particular there is no risk of collision with another vehicle 9, 10.
- the stationary device 1 Since the deviation between the Set speed profile 7 and the actual speed profile 8 is smaller than a predetermined limit, the stationary device 1 is no warning signal.
- the limit value of the deviation is set so that a warning signal is emitted if there is a deviation from the setpoint speed profile 7 of more than 10 km / h.
- intersection 2 Since a risk of collision only exists when a driver with a higher speed than the target speed profile 7, the intersection 2 approaches, it may also be provided in the context of the evaluation that only in a positive overrun of the target speed profile. 7 a warning signal is triggered.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 show a second embodiment of the function of the fixed device for reducing the risk of collision of vehicles.
- the vehicle 6 approaches the intersection 2 at which the stationary device 1 is installed.
- the illustrated traffic situation agrees with the in Fig. 1 shown match.
- intersection 2 the right of way to the right on the left applies. In the situation shown, however, there are no other vehicles approaching the intersection 2.
- Fig. 4 shows the target speed profile 7, which is assigned to the junction 2, as well as a dashed drawn actual speed profile 11, which is assigned to the vehicle 6. It can be seen that the actual speed profile 11 in this embodiment is above the desired speed profile 7, that is, the vehicle 6 moves faster because the driver has detected that no other vehicle exists which, if applicable, should be granted priority.
- the evaluation unit takes into account a different target speed profile 12, which is assigned to a situation in which no intersection traffic, that is to say no further approaching vehicles, is present.
- the desired speed profile 12 for the crossing for the intersection 2 without intersection traffic is in Fig. 4 shown. Since the actual speed profile 11 is below the desired speed profile 12, no warning signal is output.
- the stationary device 1 can also be designed so that generally no warning signal is output when no intersection traffic, that is, no other approaching vehicles, are available. In this case, no collision is to be feared, even if the driver approaches at a speed of the intersection 2, which is above the target speed profile 12.
- FIGS. 5 and 6 show a further embodiment of the invention.
- the vehicle 6 approaches the intersection 2, the corresponding actual speed profile 13 is in Fig. 6 shown.
- the authorized vehicle 9 approaches from the right Fig. 6 it can be seen that the actual speed profile 13 is above the desired speed profile 7.
- the distance d between the two speed profiles exceeds a specified limit, so that a warning signal 14 is emitted by the stationary device 1.
- This in Fig. 5 schematically illustrated warning signal 14 is transmitted wirelessly via a radio link by means of a transmitting device of the stationary device 1.
- the motor vehicle 6 has a receiving device which is able to receive the emitted warning signal and output visually and acoustically to the driver.
- the driver of this vehicle can also be warned of an imminent dangerous situation.
- the warning signal 14 is transmitted via WLAN.
- a further or another warning signal can optionally be emitted by the stationary device 1, which results in the vehicle 6 performing emergency braking.
- This intervention in the vehicle control can either Alternatively, the warning signal is evaluated by an evaluation of the vehicle, which then optionally an automatic action, eg. B. triggers an emergency stop.
- intersection traffic In the evaluation of the actual speed profile by the evaluation is essential that it is first checked which of the two basic situations is present, that is, whether intersection traffic is present or not. Situations in which there is no intersection traffic, that is to say at least one further vehicle approaching the intersection, are relatively uncritical, since then there is no risk of collision. In this case, warnings can be dispensed with by the stationary device 1. However, if intersection traffic is present, the corresponding desired speed profile 12 is taken into account and determined whether a warning signal is to be sent or not.
- Fig. 7 shows a further embodiment of the function of the fixed device 1.
- the in Fig. 7 shown traffic situation corresponds to that of Fig. 5 that is, next to the vehicle 6, another vehicle 9 approaches the intersection 2, wherein the vehicle 9 is entitled to drive.
- the stationary device 1 will detect, after detecting the exceeding of the limit value for the deviation, the setpoint value.
- Speed Profile 7 information sent out, this radio signal is in Fig. 7 designated by the reference numeral 15.
- the radio signal 15 is received and evaluated by an on-board evaluation unit of the vehicle 6.
- the on-board evaluation unit compares the target speed profile received by the radio signal 15 with the actual speed profile, with a detected deviation exceeding a predetermined limit, an action is triggered.
- the action consists of issuing a warning signal that is perceptible by the driver of the vehicle 6.
- an emergency braking process can occur in the event of a risk of collision to be triggered.
- the vehicle 6 is always transmitted during a journey current target speed profiles of the intersections, which he approaches. As a result, changes that occurred in the meantime can be taken into account.
- Fig. 8 shows a further embodiment of the function of the fixed device 1.
- the in Fig. 8 The traffic situation shown differs from the previous one by the road condition.
- the road 16 is at least partially covered in snow and provided with ice.
- This deviating environmental state is taken into account by selecting a different desired velocity profile from the evaluation unit of the stationary device 1.
- additional speed profiles are stored in the memory which are assigned to different environmental conditions. These include a speed profile for twilight or for night driving and speed profiles for different times or other weather conditions such as fog, rain, etc.
- the current environmental conditions can detect the stationary device 1 itself via corresponding sensors, alternatively, these environmental conditions from a transmitter to a large Number of fixed facilities to be sent.
- a warning signal is thus emitted by the stationary device 1 which has been selected on the basis of the current environmental conditions from a plurality of desired speed profiles.
- only one of the plurality of desired speed profiles can be selected based on the environmental conditions, which can be evaluated by the evaluation unit in the vehicle.
- Fig. 9 schematically shows the stationary device 1, the sensors 17 has to detect relevant sectors of the intersection 2.
- the stationary device 1 has the transmitting device 19 in order to transmit a desired speed profile or a warning signal to vehicles.
- the stationary device 1 can also be integrated in a traffic light or in a traffic sign or attached thereto.
- the stationary device ensures a reliable warning of road users from dangerous situations, with erroneous warnings can be almost ruled out.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Atmospheric Sciences (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft eine ortsfeste Einrichtung zur Verringerung der Kollisionsgefahr von Kraftfahrzeugen.The invention relates to a stationary device for reducing the risk of collision of motor vehicles.
Die Annäherung eines Kraftfahrzeugs an eine Kreuzung und die Überquerung der Kreuzung unterliegt einem höheren Risiko, insbesondere wenn weitere Kraftfahrzeuge oder andere Verkehrsteilnehmer vorhanden sind. Häufig passieren Unfälle durch Nichtbeachtung vorfahrtsberechtigter Fahrzeuge. Ein Beispiel dafür ist eine Kreuzung mit einem Vorfahrt-gewähren-Verkehrszeichen. Dasselbe gilt für Kreuzungen, an der die Regel rechts vor links gilt sowie bei Kreuzungen, die ein Stoppschild oder eine Ampel aufweisen.The approach of a motor vehicle to an intersection and the crossing of the intersection is subject to a higher risk, especially if other vehicles or other road users exist. Often, accidents happen due to non-observance of vehicles entitled to drive. An example of this is an intersection with a right of way grant road sign. The same applies to intersections where the rule on the right is to the left and intersections that have a stop sign or a traffic light.
Um den Fahrer zu unterstützen, sind bereits Fahrerassistenzsysteme vorgeschlagen worden, die in den meisten Fällen auf einer kamerabasierten Umfeldbeobachtung beruhen und bei einer erkannten gefährlichen Situation ein Warnsignal ausgeben oder in die Fahrzeugsteuerung eingreifen, z. B. durch Auslösen eines Bremsvorgangs. Aus der
In der
Ein Kraftfahrzeug mit einem Kollisionsvermeidungssystem ist aus der
In der
Eine Vorrichtung zur Unterstützung des Fahrers beim Überqueren von Verkehrskreuzungen ist aus der
Bei allen bekannten Kollisionswarnvorrichtungen und den entsprechenden Verfahren, besteht das Problem, dass kollisionsvermeidende Maßnahmen wie die Ausgabe von Fahrerwarnungen im Fahrzeug oder automatische Notbremsungen nur schwer fehlerfrei umzusetzen sind. Schwierig ist insbesondere die Vermeidung von Fehlwarnungen und fehlerhaften Eingriffen in die Fahrzeugsteuerung. Um eine derartige Warnung oder einen Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung mit größerer Sicherheit durchzuführen, muss festgestellt werden, ob sich der Fahrer während der Annäherung an die Kreuzung fehlerhaft verhält oder nicht. Diese Feststellung könnte durch einen Abgleich des aktuellen Fahrerverhaltens mit einem zuvor ermittelten Soll-Fahrerverhalten erfolgen. Bei einer Annäherung an eine Kreuzung reduziert der Fahrer üblicherweise die Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeit, da entgegenkommende oder kreuzende Fahrzeuge oder andere Verkehrsteilnehmer vorhanden sind oder um ein Verkehrszeichen zu beachten. Anhand dieses Fahrverhaltens kann entschieden werden, ob sich der Fahrer der Kreuzung angepasst nähert.In all known collision warning devices and the corresponding methods, there is the problem that collision-avoiding measures such as the issue of driver warnings in the vehicle or automatic emergency braking are difficult to implement error-free. In particular, the avoidance of false warnings and incorrect interventions in the vehicle control is difficult. In order to perform such warning or intervention in the vehicle control with greater certainty, it must be determined whether or not the driver behaves erratically during the approach to the intersection. This determination could be made by comparing the current driver behavior with a previously determined desired driver behavior. When approaching an intersection, the driver usually reduces the vehicle speed because oncoming or crossing vehicles or other road users are present or to observe a traffic sign. On the basis of this driving behavior, it can be decided whether the driver approaches the intersection appropriately.
Bei der Überquerung einer Kreuzung sind zwei Grundsituationen zu unterscheiden: falls Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist, muss der Fahrer seine Geschwindigkeit reduzieren und gegebenenfalls anhalten und den Kreuzungsverkehr vorbei lassen, eher er in die Kreuzung einfahren kann. Dies betrifft die Fälle, wenn der Fahrer nicht bevorrechtigt ist, das heißt, wenn sich auf seiner Fahrspur ein Vorfahrt-gewähren-Schild oder ein Stoppschild befindet, oder wenn an der Kreuzung die Regel rechts vor links gilt.When crossing an intersection, two basic situations are to be distinguished: if intersection traffic exists, the driver must reduce his speed and stop if necessary and let the intersection traffic pass before he can enter the intersection. This applies to cases when the driver is not privileged, that is, when there is a right of turn sign or stop sign in his lane, or when the right-to-left rule is at the intersection.
Zusätzlich ist die Situation relevant, wenn kein Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist. In diesem Fall nähert sich der Fahrer üblicherweise der Kreuzung mit höherer Geschwindigkeit als im ersten Fall und kann direkt in die Kreuzung einfahren, zumindest wenn dort ein Vorfahrt-gewähren-Schild aufgestellt ist oder wenn die rechts vor links-Regelung gilt.In addition, the situation is relevant if there is no intersection traffic. In this case, the driver usually approaches the intersection at a higher speed than in the first case and can enter directly into the intersection, at least if there is a right of way sign posted there or if the right is left to the left.
Eine gefährliche Situation, die zu einer Kollision führen könnte, kann somit erfasst werden, indem einerseits das Fahrerverhalten beobachtet wird und gleichzeitig mittels Fahrzeugsensoren festgestellt wird, ob sich andere Verkehrsteilnehmer der Kreuzung nähern, mit denen das Fahrzeug potentiell kollidieren könnte. In diesem Fall kann darauf geschlossen werden, dass ein Fahrfehler vorliegt, so dass der Fahrer gewarnt werden kann, gegebenenfalls kann auch ein Eingriff in die Fahrzeugsteuerung erfolgen, z. B. durch Auslösen einer automatischen Notbremsung.A dangerous situation that could lead to a collision can thus be detected by observing driver behavior on the one hand and using vehicle sensors to determine whether other road users are approaching the intersection with which the vehicle could potentially collide. In this case, it can be concluded that there is a driving error, so that the driver can be warned, if necessary, an intervention in the vehicle control can be made, for. B. by triggering an automatic emergency braking.
Obwohl durch die Einteilung in Situationen, bei denen kein Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist und solche Situationen, bei denen Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist, bereits eine Klassifizierung und Beurteilung des Fahrerverhaltens möglich ist, hat es sich herausgestellt, dass sich das Annäherungsverhalten der Fahrer von Kreuzung zu Kreuzung unterscheidet. Dieses unterschiedliche Verhalten ist darauf zurückzuführen, dass sich Kreuzungen stark hinsichtlich ihres Aufbaus, der Übersichtlichkeit, der Blickfreiheit und durch weitere Einflussfaktoren wie die vorhandene Bebauung unterscheiden. Ebenso spielen Umgebungseinflüsse wie Helligkeit, Wetterbedingungen und Straßenzustand eine Rolle. Dementsprechend wäre es erforderlich, für jede Kreuzung einen individuellen Vergleich zwischen Soll-Verhalten und Ist-Verhalten des Fahrers durchzuführen, um eine gesicherte Warnung oder einen gesicherten Eingriff durchführen zu können. Allerdings wäre dazu für jede Kreuzung ein individueller Soll-Verlauf der Annäherung zu ermitteln, im Hinblick auf die große Anzahl unterschiedlicher Kreuzungen wäre der dazu erforderliche Aufwand für die Durchführung und Auswertung jedoch zu hoch.Although classification into situations where there is no intersection traffic and situations in which intersection traffic exists, classification and assessment of driver behavior is already possible, it has been found that the approach behavior of the driver differs from intersection to intersection. This different behavior is due to the fact that intersections differ greatly in terms of their structure, clarity, freedom from gaze and other influencing factors such as existing buildings. Environmental factors such as brightness, weather conditions and road conditions also play a role. Accordingly, it would be necessary for each crossing to make an individual comparison between the desired behavior and the actual behavior the driver to perform a secure warning or a secured intervention. However, for each intersection, an individual target course of approach would have to be determined, but in view of the large number of different intersections, the effort required for implementation and evaluation would be too high.
Der Erfindung liegt daher die Aufgabe zugrunde, eine ortsfeste Einrichtung zur Verringerung der Kollisionsgefahr von Fahrzeugen anzugeben, die für jegliche Kreuzungen einsetzbar ist.The invention is therefore an object of the invention to provide a fixed device for reducing the risk of collision of vehicles, which can be used for any intersections.
Zur Lösung dieser Aufgabe ist bei einer ortsfesten Einrichtung der eingangs genannten Art erfindungsgemäß vorgesehen, dass sie die folgenden Merkmale umfasst: Wenigstens einen Sensor zum Überwachen von wenigstens zwei Fahrspuren im Bereich einer Kreuzung und zum Erfassen sich nähernder Fahrzeuge, einen Speicher, in dem wenigstens ein der Einrichtung zugeordnetes Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil gespeichert ist, wobei die Einrichtung dazu ausgebildet ist, wenigstens eine das Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil betreffende Information mittels einer Sendeeinrichtung drahtlos auszusenden, die von einem sich der Einrichtung nähernden Fahrzeug empfangbar ist.To achieve this object, according to the invention, in a fixed device of the type mentioned at the outset, it comprises the following features: at least one sensor for monitoring at least two lanes in the area of an intersection and for detecting approaching vehicles, a memory in which at least one The setpoint speed profile assigned to the device is stored, the device being designed to wirelessly transmit at least one information concerning the setpoint speed profile by means of a transmission device that can be received by a vehicle approaching the device.
Die Erfindung beruht auf der Idee, Kreuzungen mit wenigstens einem Sensor, vorzugsweise mehreren Sensoren, auszustatten, um wenigstens zwei Fahrspuren, vorzugsweise alle zur Kreuzung führenden Fahrspuren zu überwachen. Wenn durch einen Sensor ein sich näherndes Fahrzeug erfasst worden ist, wird von der Einrichtung eine ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil betreffende Information ausgesendet, die von dem sich der Einrichtung nähernden Fahrzeug empfangen werden kann. Das Fahrzeug weist dazu eine entsprechende Empfangseinrichtung auf. Die von der Sendeinrichtung ausgesendeten Informationen werden drahtlos, das heißt per Funk, mittels eines geeigneten Funkstandards übertragen.The invention is based on the idea of equipping intersections with at least one sensor, preferably a plurality of sensors, in order to monitor at least two lanes, preferably all lanes leading to the intersection. When an approaching vehicle has been detected by a sensor, the device transmits information relating to a desired speed profile that can be received by the vehicle approaching the device. The vehicle has for this purpose a corresponding receiving device. The information transmitted by the transmitting device is transmitted wirelessly, that is by radio, by means of a suitable radio standard.
Die ortsfeste Einrichtung weist einen Speicher auf, in dem ein oder mehrere der Einrichtung, das heißt der Kreuzung, zugeordnete Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile gespeichert sind.The stationary device has a memory in which one or more of the device, that is the junction, associated desired speed profiles are stored.
Gemäß einer ersten Ausgestaltung der Erfindung kann es vorgesehen sein, dass die Einrichtung eine Auswerteeinheit aufweist, die dazu ausgebildet ist, das Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil des sich nähernden Fahrzeugs mit dem wenigstens einen Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil zu vergleichen und eine Abweichung zwischen dem Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil und dem Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil zu erfassen und beim Überschreiten eines Grenzwerts für die Abweichung ein Warnsignal mittels der Sendeeinrichtung auszugeben. Die Auswerteeinheit ist dabei Bestandteil der ortsfesten Einrichtung, so dass die Auswertung der von den Sensoren gelieferten Informationen von der ortsfesten Einrichtung vorgenommen wird. Ein Fahrzeug, das sich der ortsfesten Einrichtung nähert, wird erfasst, insbesondere wird ein Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil des sich nähernden Fahrzeugs erfasst. Dieses Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil wird mit einem Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil verglichen. Falls die Abweichung einen festgelegten Grenzwert überschreitet, wird ein Warnsignal mittels der Sendeeinrichtung der ortsfesten Einrichtung ausgegeben, dieses Warnsignal kann von dem Fahrzeug empfangen werden, so dass das Warnsignal an den Fahrer ausgegeben werden kann. Diese Variante weist den Vorteil auf, dass fahrzeugseitig keine Auswerteeinheit erforderlich ist. Das Fahrzeug muss lediglich in der Lage sein, Warnsignal zu empfangen und an den Fahrer auszugeben.According to a first embodiment of the invention, it can be provided that the device has an evaluation unit which is designed to compare the actual speed profile of the approaching vehicle with the at least one desired speed profile and a deviation between the actual speed profile and the To detect desired speed profile and output when exceeding a threshold for the deviation of a warning signal by means of the transmitting device. The evaluation unit is part of the stationary device, so that the evaluation of the information supplied by the sensors is performed by the stationary device. A vehicle approaching the stationary device is detected, in particular an actual speed profile of the approaching vehicle is detected. This actual velocity profile is compared with a desired velocity profile. If the deviation exceeds a predetermined limit, a warning signal is output by means of the transmitter of the stationary device, this warning signal can be received by the vehicle, so that the warning signal can be output to the driver. This variant has the advantage that no evaluation unit is required on the vehicle side. The vehicle only needs to be able to receive warning signals and output to the driver.
Bei der erfindungsgemäßen Einrichtung wird es bevorzugt, dass die Sensoren als Radarsensoren oder Ultraschallsensoren oder als optische Sensoren ausgebildet sind. Gegebenenfalls kann auch eine Kombination verschiedener Sensorarten vorgesehen sein. Die Sensoren können so angeordnet sein, dass einzelne Fahrspuren gezielt überwacht werden, beispielsweise diejenigen Fahrspuren, die zur Kreuzung hinführen.In the device according to the invention, it is preferred that the sensors are designed as radar sensors or ultrasound sensors or as optical sensors. Optionally, a combination of different types of sensors may be provided. The sensors can be arranged so that individual lanes are specifically monitored, for example, those lanes that lead to the intersection.
Zur Verbesserung der Funktionalität kann es vorgesehen sein, dass die erfindungsgemäße Einrichtung in einem Lernmodus betreibbar ist, in dem Geschwindigkeitsprofile von sich nähernden Fahrzeugen erfassbar sind, um ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil festzulegen oder zu aktualisieren. Das Betreiben der Einrichtung in dem Lernmodus kann nach der Installation der Einrichtung erfolgen, sofern keine Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile in dem Speicher hinterlegt sind. Alternativ ist es jedoch auch möglich, ein oder mehrere Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile in dem Speicher zu hinterlegen, so dass die Funktion des Aussendens von Informationen unmittelbar nach der Installation einer ortsfesten Einrichtung zur Verfügung steht. In diesem Zusammenhang ist es auch denkbar, die erfindungsgemäße Einrichtung in zeitlichen Abständen in dem Lernmodus zu betreiben, um Geschwindigkeitsprofile von sich nähernden Fahrzeugen zu erfassen, um daraus ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil abzuleiten. Ebenso ist es möglich, dass sämtliche sich der Einrichtung nähernden Fahrzeuge berücksichtigt werden, indem deren Geschwindigkeitsprofil erfasst wird und bei der Festlegung oder Aktualisierung des Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofils berücksichtig wird. Das Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil kann dabei z. B. durch eine statistische Auswertung vieler Geschwindigkeitsprofile erstellt werden, aus denen Durchschnittswerte sowie Abweichungen nach oben und nach unten ermittelt werden können. Wesentlich ist dabei, dass Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile für zwei Fälle ermittelt werden, nämlich einerseits für den Fall, wenn kein Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist, sowie andererseits für den Fall, wenn sich gleichzeitig ein oder mehrere Fremdfahrzeuge der ortsfesten Einrichtung beziehungsweise der Kreuzung nähern.To improve the functionality, it may be provided that the device according to the invention can be operated in a learning mode in which speed profiles of approaching vehicles can be detected in order to set or update a desired speed profile. The operation of the device in the learning mode may be after the installation of the device take place, if no desired speed profiles are stored in the memory. Alternatively, however, it is also possible to store one or more desired speed profiles in the memory, so that the function of transmitting information is available immediately after the installation of a stationary device. In this context, it is also conceivable to operate the device according to the invention at intervals in the learning mode in order to detect speed profiles of approaching vehicles, in order to derive therefrom a desired speed profile. It is also possible that all vehicles approaching the device are taken into account by recording their speed profile and taking it into account when setting or updating the setpoint speed profile. The target velocity profile can be z. B. by a statistical evaluation of many speed profiles are created from which average values and deviations can be determined up and down. It is essential that target speed profiles are determined for two cases, namely on the one hand for the case when there is no intersection traffic, and on the other hand for the case when approaching one or more other vehicles of the stationary device or the intersection.
In diesem Zusammenhang kann es auch vorgesehen sein, dass die Auswerteeinheit dazu ausgebildet ist, das Warnsignal nur dann auszugeben, wenn sich wenigstens zwei Fahrzeuge gleichzeitig der Einrichtung nähern. Das bedeutet, dass sich wenigstens ein Fremdfahrzeug in der Nähe befindet, so dass es möglicherweise zu einer Kollision kommen kann. Wenn hingegen lediglich ein Fahrzeug im Umfeld der ortsfesten Einrichtung beziehungsweise im Umfeld der Kreuzung ermittelt werden kann, wird hingegen kein Warnsignal ausgegeben, da keine Kollisionsgefahr zwischen Fahrzeugen besteht.In this context, it can also be provided that the evaluation unit is designed to output the warning signal only when at least two vehicles approach the device at the same time. This means that at least one other vehicle is in the vicinity, so that it may possibly lead to a collision. On the other hand, if only one vehicle can be determined in the vicinity of the stationary device or in the vicinity of the intersection, no warning signal is output because there is no danger of collision between vehicles.
Erfindungsgemäß kann das Warnsignal drahtlos aussendbar sein, insbesondere per WLAN, UMTS oder Bluetooth. Daneben kann jede andere geeignete Frequenz oder ein geeignetes Übertragungsverfahren benutzt werden, für das ein entsprechender Empfänger im Fahrzeug vorhanden ist. Erfindungsgemäß kann es vorgesehen sein, dass das Warnsignal ungerichtet an sich nähernde Fahrzeuge aussendbar ist. Diese Variante hat den Vorteil, dass keine bidirektionale Kommunikation zwischen der ortsfesten Einrichtung und einem bestimmten Kraftfahrzeug hergestellt werden muss. Stattdessen wird das Warnsignal ungerichtet ausgesendet, so dass es von allen sich nähernden Fahrzeugen, die mit einer entsprechenden Empfangseinrichtung ausgestattet sind, empfangen werden kann.According to the invention, the warning signal can be transmitted wirelessly, in particular via WLAN, UMTS or Bluetooth. In addition, any other suitable frequency or a suitable transmission method can be used, for which a corresponding receiver is present in the vehicle. According to the invention, it may be provided that the warning signal can be emitted in an undirected manner to approaching vehicles. This variant has the advantage that no bidirectional communication between the stationary device and a particular motor vehicle has to be established. Instead, the warning signal is sent out undirected, so that it can be received by all approaching vehicles that are equipped with a corresponding receiving device.
Andererseits kann es auch vorgesehen sein, dass ein Warnsignal gerichtet an ein sich näherndes Fahrzeug aussendbar ist. Dadurch ergibt sich der Vorteil, dass nur ein bestimmtes Fahrzeug beziehungsweise ein bestimmter Fahrer, der sich in einer gefährlichen Situation befindet, gewarnt wird, ohne dass es zu einer fehlerhaften Warnung oder zu einem Fehlalarm bei einem Fahrzeug kommt, das sich nicht in einer Gefahrensituation befindet.On the other hand, it can also be provided that a warning signal can be emitted directed to an approaching vehicle. This results in the advantage that only a specific vehicle or a particular driver who is in a dangerous situation, is warned without it comes to a faulty warning or a false alarm in a vehicle that is not in a dangerous situation ,
Bei der erfindungsgemäßen Einrichtung kann es vorgesehen sein, dass die Abweichung der Ist-Geschwindigkeit von der Soll-Geschwindigkeit als absolute Abweichung oder als relative Abweichung definiert ist. Beispielsweise kann eine absolute Abweichung als ein Geschwindigkeitskorridor definiert sein, der z. B. einem Bereich von ± 5 km/h um die Soll-Geschwindigkeit abdeckt. Eine relative Abweichung kann durch die Definition einer prozentualen Abweichung definiert sein, z. b. ein Bereich von - 10 % bis + 10 %, bezogen auf die Sollgeschwindigkeit.In the device according to the invention, it can be provided that the deviation of the actual speed from the desired speed is defined as absolute deviation or as relative deviation. For example, an absolute deviation may be defined as a speed corridor, e.g. B. covers a range of ± 5 km / h to the target speed. A relative deviation may be defined by the definition of a percentage deviation, e.g. b. a range of - 10% to + 10%, based on the target speed.
Die erfindungsgemäße Einrichtung kann auch dahingehend erweitert sein, dass in dem Speicher mehrere Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile gespeichert sind, bei denen wenigstens einer der folgenden Einflussfaktoren berücksichtigt ist: Uhrzeit, Jahreszeit, Helligkeit, Straßenzustand, Wetterbedingungen, insbesondere Regen, Schnee, Glatteis. In Abhängigkeit der aktuellen Umgebungsbedingungen wird jeweils ein passendes Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil ausgewählt, das für die Auswertung durch die Auswerteeinheit zugrunde gelegt wird. Dadurch ist es möglich, den Einfluss sich ändernder Umweltbedingungen auf das Fahrverhalten zu berücksichtigen.The device according to the invention can also be extended to store in the memory a plurality of desired speed profiles in which at least one of the following influencing factors is taken into account: time of day, season, brightness, road conditions, weather conditions, in particular rain, snow, black ice. Depending on the current environmental conditions in each case a suitable target speed profile is selected, which is used for the evaluation by the evaluation unit. This makes it possible to consider the influence of changing environmental conditions on driving behavior.
Das erfindungsgemäße Kraftfahrzeug zeichnet sich dadurch aus, dass die Empfangseinrichtung zum Empfangen eines Warnsignals ausgebildet ist, das im Fahrzeug optisch und/oder akustisch und/oder haptisch ausgebbar ist und/oder durch das automatisch eine Aktion auslösbar ist. Mittels der Empfangseinrichtung können Warnsignale, darüber hinaus jedoch auch ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil betreffende Informationen empfangen werden, die, gegebenenfalls nach einer Auswertung, in Form eines Warnsignals ausgegeben werden, so dass sie vom Fahrer wahrgenommen werden können. Um das Risiko einer Kollision zu verringern oder völlig auszuschließen, kann es bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Kraftfahrzeug vorgesehen sein, dass nach dem Empfang eines Warnsignals eine Bremsbetätigung oder ein Eingriff in die Gaspedalbetätigung auslösbar ist. Daneben können weitere Aktionen vorgenommen werden, beispielsweise könnten Bremslichter aktiviert werden, dasselbe gilt für Scheinwerfer des Kraftfahrzeugs, um durch diese optischen Signale andere Verkehrsteilnehmer zu warnen.The motor vehicle according to the invention is characterized in that the receiving device is designed to receive a warning signal which can be optically and / or acoustically and / or haptically output in the vehicle and / or by which an action can be triggered automatically. By means of the receiving device warning signals, but also a target speed profile information can be received, which, optionally after an evaluation, are output in the form of a warning signal so that they can be perceived by the driver. In order to reduce or completely eliminate the risk of a collision, it may be provided in the motor vehicle according to the invention that a brake actuation or an intervention in the accelerator pedal actuation can be triggered after receiving a warning signal. In addition, further actions can be taken, for example, brake lights could be activated, the same applies to the headlights of the motor vehicle to warn by these optical signals other road users.
Daneben betrifft die Erfindung ein Kraftfahrzeug mit einer Empfangseinrichtung für drahtlos übertragene sicherheitsrelevante Informationen. Bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Kraftfahrzeug ist vorgesehen, dass die Empfangseinrichtung zum Empfangen von Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofilen ausgebildet ist, die von einer ortsfesten Einrichtung ausgesendet werden. Der Unterschied zwischen dem zuvor beschriebenen Kraftfahrzeug liegt darin, dass die Auswertung der Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofile und das Feststellen einer Abweichung fahrzeugseitig erfolgt. Bei dem zuvor beschriebenen Kraftfahrzeug erfolgt diese Auswertung in einer Auswerteeinheit, die der ortsfesten Einrichtung zugeordnet ist. Die ortsfeste Einrichtung sendet dann lediglich Warnsignale aus.In addition, the invention relates to a motor vehicle with a receiving device for wirelessly transmitted security-related information. In the case of the motor vehicle according to the invention, it is provided that the receiving device is designed to receive desired speed profiles which are transmitted by a stationary device. The difference between the motor vehicle described above is that the evaluation of the desired speed profiles and the detection of a deviation on the vehicle side. In the case of the motor vehicle described above, this evaluation takes place in an evaluation unit which is assigned to the stationary device. The stationary device then sends only warning signals.
Andererseits weisst das erfindungsgemäße Kraftfahrzeug eine Auswerteeinheit auf die dazu ausgebildet ist, wenigstens ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil mit einem Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil zu vergleichen und eine Abweichung zu erfassen und beim Überschreiten eines Grenzwerts für die Abweichung eine Aktion auszulösen. Das Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofil ergibt sich dabei aus bekannten aktuellen Zustandsdaten. Das Auslösen der Aktion kann das Ausgeben eines Warnsignals umfassen und/oder eine Bremsbetätigung und/oder einen Eingriff in die Gaspedalbetätigung und/oder in die Fahrzeuglenkung und/oder die Fahrzeugsteuerung.On the other hand, the motor vehicle according to the invention has an evaluation unit which is designed to have at least one desired speed profile to compare with an actual speed profile and to detect a deviation and to trigger an action when exceeding a limit value for the deviation. The actual velocity profile results from known current state data. The triggering of the action may include the issuing of a warning signal and / or a brake application and / or an intervention in the accelerator pedal operation and / or in the vehicle steering system and / or the vehicle control system.
Weitere Vorteile und Einzelheiten der Erfindung werden nachfolgend anhand von Ausführungsbeispielen unter Bezugnahme auf die Zeichnungen erläutert. Die Zeichnungen sind schematische Darstellungen und zeigen:
- Fig. 1
- eine im Bereich einer Kreuzung installierte erfindungsgemäße ortsfeste Einrichtung;
- Fig. 2
- zwei Geschwindigkeitsverläufe bei der Annäherung an die Kreuzung;
- Fig. 3
- die ortsfeste Einrichtung von
Fig. 1 während einer anderen Verkehrssituation; - Fig. 4
- mehrere Geschwindigkeitsverläufe bei der Annäherung an die Kreuzung von
Fig. 3 ; - Fig. 5
- die ortsfeste Einrichtung von
Fig. 1 während einer weiteren Verkehrssituation; - Fig. 6
- zwei Geschwindigkeitsverläufe bei der Annäherung an die Kreuzung von
Fig. 5 ; - Fig. 7
- ein weiteres Ausführungsbeispiel einer erfindungsgemäßen ortsfesten Einrichtung;
- Fig. 8
- die in
Fig. 1 gezeigte erfindungsgemäße ortsfeste Einrichtung gemäß einem weiteren Ausführungsbeispiel; und - Fig. 9
- ein Ausführungsbeispiel einer erfindungsgemäßen ortsfesten Einrichtung.
- Fig. 1
- a stationary device according to the invention installed in the region of an intersection;
- Fig. 2
- two speed profiles when approaching the intersection;
- Fig. 3
- the fixed installation of
Fig. 1 during another traffic situation; - Fig. 4
- several speed curves when approaching the intersection of
Fig. 3 ; - Fig. 5
- the fixed installation of
Fig. 1 during another traffic situation; - Fig. 6
- two speed curves when approaching the intersection of
Fig. 5 ; - Fig. 7
- a further embodiment of a stationary device according to the invention;
- Fig. 8
- in the
Fig. 1 shown fixed device according to the invention according to a further embodiment; and - Fig. 9
- an embodiment of a stationary device according to the invention.
Die ortsfeste Einrichtung 1 zur Verringerung der Kollisionsgefahr von Fahrzeugen weist Sensoren auf, die die Fahrbahnen 3, 4 abdecken, so dass Kraftfahrzeuge, die sich aus allen vier Richtungen der Kreuzung 2 nähern, erfasst werden können. Die Sensoren sind zum Überwachen der Fahrspuren der Fahrbahnen 3, 4 ausgebildet, das heißt bei einem sich nähernden Fahrzeug wird sowohl dessen Weg als auch dessen Geschwindigkeit erfasst. Durch die Berücksichtigung des zeitlichen Verlaufs kann zusätzlich eine Beschleunigung oder Verzögerung eines sich nähernden Fahrzeugs detektiert werden. Die ortsfeste Einrichtung 1 weist einen Speicher auf, in dem ein Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil gespeichert ist. Dieses Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil ist speziell auf diese ortsfeste Einrichtung 1 abgestimmt. In einem vorangegangenen Lernmodus sind Geschwindigkeitsprofile sich nähernder Fahrzeuge erfasst worden, durch statistische Methoden ist daraus das Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil abgeleitet worden.The
Da eine Kollisionsgefahr nur dann vorliegt, wenn sich ein Fahrer mit einer höheren Geschwindigkeit, als dem Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil 7 entspricht, der Kreuzung 2 nähert, kann es im Rahmen der Auswertung auch vorgesehen sein, dass nur bei einer positiven Überschreitung des Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofils 7 ein Warnsignal ausgelöst wird.Since a risk of collision only exists when a driver with a higher speed than the
Die
Die
Bei der Auswertung des Ist-Geschwindigkeitsprofils durch die Auswerteeinrichtung ist wesentlich, dass zunächst geprüft wird, welche der beiden Grundsituationen vorliegt, das heißt ob Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist oder nicht. Situationen, bei denen kein Kreuzungsverkehr, das heißt wenigstens ein weiteres sich der Kreuzung näherndes Fahrzeug vorhanden ist, sind vergleichsweise unkritisch, da dann kein Kollisionsrisiko besteht. In diesem Fall kann auf Warnungen durch die ortsfeste Einrichtung 1 verzichtet werden. Sofern allerdings Kreuzungsverkehr vorhanden ist, wird das entsprechende Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofil 12 berücksichtigt und ermittelt, ob ein Warnsignal auszusenden ist oder nicht.In the evaluation of the actual speed profile by the evaluation is essential that it is first checked which of the two basic situations is present, that is, whether intersection traffic is present or not. Situations in which there is no intersection traffic, that is to say at least one further vehicle approaching the intersection, are relatively uncritical, since then there is no risk of collision. In this case, warnings can be dispensed with by the
Sofern sich der Fahrer des Fahrzeugs 6 der Kreuzung 2 mit einer zu hohen Geschwindigkeit nähert, wird somit von der ortsfesten Einrichtung 1 ein Warnsignal ausgesendet, das anhand der aktuellen Umweltbedingungen aus mehreren Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofilen ausgewählt worden ist. Alternativ kann lediglich aus den mehreren Soll-Geschwindigkeitsprofilen eines anhand der Umweltbedingungen ausgewählt werden, das von der Auswerteeinheit in dem Fahrzeug ausgewertet werden kann.If the driver of the
Durch die ortsfeste Einrichtung wird eine zuverlässige Warnung der Verkehrsteilnehmer vor gefährlichen Situationen gewährleistet, wobei fehlerhafte Warnungen nahezu ausgeschlossen werden können.The stationary device ensures a reliable warning of road users from dangerous situations, with erroneous warnings can be almost ruled out.
Claims (11)
- Static device (1) for reducing the collision risk of vehicles,
characterised in that
the device (1) comprises:- sensors (17) for monitoring at least two traffic lanes in the region of an intersection (2) and for detecting approaching vehicles (6, 9, 10);- a memory (18) in which at least one setpoint speed profile assigned to the device (1) is stored;- the setpoint speed profile comprising value pairs consisting of a distance and a setpoint speed assigned to the distance;- the device (1) being configured to wirelessly transmit by means of a transmitter device (19) at least one information item relating to the setpoint speed profile, which can be received by a vehicle (6, 9, 18) approaching the device (1) - Device according to Claim 1,
characterised in that
it has an evaluation unit which is configured to compare the actual speed profile of the approaching vehicle (6, 9, 10) with the at least one setpoint speed profile and to detect a difference between the actual speed profile and the setpoint speed profile, and to emit a warning signal by means of the transmitter device (19) when a limit value for the difference is exceeded. - Device according to Claim 1 or 2,
characterised in that
the sensors (17) are configured as radar sensors or ultrasound sensors or optical sensors, the device (1) optionally having different sensors (17). - Device according to one of the preceding claims,
characterised in that
it can be operated in a learning mode in which speed profiles of approaching vehicles (6, 9, 10) can be detected, in order to establish or update a setpoint speed profile. - Device according to one of Claims 2 to 4,
characterised in that
the evaluation device is configured to emit a warning signal only when at least two vehicles (6, 9, 10) are approaching the device simultaneously. - Device according to one of Claims 2 to 5,
characterised in that
the warning signal can be transmitted wirelessly, in particular by WLAN, UMTS or Bluetooth. - Device according to one of Claims 2 to 6,
characterised in that
the warning signal can be transmitted nondirectionally to approaching vehicles (6, 9, 10) or directionally to an approaching vehicle (6, 9, 10). - Device according to one of Claims 2 to 7,
characterised in that
the difference of the actual speed from the setpoint speed is defined as an absolute difference or relative difference. - Device according to one of the preceding claims,
characterised in that
a plurality of setpoint speed profiles, in which at least one of the following influencing factors is taken into account, are stored in the memory (18): time, season, brightness, road condition, weather conditions, in particular rain, snow, ice. - Motor vehicle having a reception device for wirelessly transmitted safety-relevant information,
characterised in that
the reception device is configured to receive setpoint speed profiles which are transmitted by a static device and are assigned to the static device, the setpoint speed profile comprising value pairs consisting of a distance and a setpoint speed assigned to the distance,
characterised in that
the motor vehicle has an evaluation unit which is configured to compare at least one setpoint speed profile with an actual speed profile and to detect a difference between the actual speed profile and the setpoint speed profile, and to initiate an action when a limit value for the difference is exceeded. - Motor vehicle according to Claim 10,
characterised in that
the action comprises the emission of a warning signal and/or brake actuation and/or intervention in the acceleration pedal actuation.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE201310014157 DE102013014157A1 (en) | 2013-08-24 | 2013-08-24 | Stationary device for reducing the risk of collision of motor vehicles |
PCT/EP2014/002044 WO2015028114A1 (en) | 2013-08-24 | 2014-07-26 | Stationary device for reducing the risk of a collision between motor vehicles |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3036727A1 EP3036727A1 (en) | 2016-06-29 |
EP3036727B1 true EP3036727B1 (en) | 2017-03-15 |
Family
ID=51229868
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14744467.3A Not-in-force EP3036727B1 (en) | 2013-08-24 | 2014-07-26 | Stationary device for reducing the risk of a collision between motor vehicles |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3036727B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102013014157A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015028114A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11507109B2 (en) | 2019-04-17 | 2022-11-22 | Toyota Research Institute, Inc. | Signaling autonomous vehicles |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110379191B (en) * | 2018-11-08 | 2020-12-22 | 北京京东尚科信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for pushing road information for unmanned equipment |
DE102021204067A1 (en) | 2021-04-23 | 2022-10-27 | Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH | Method of creating a collision probabilities map |
DE102022200871A1 (en) | 2022-01-26 | 2023-01-19 | Zf Friedrichshafen Ag | System for monitoring a traffic infrastructure |
DE102022211126A1 (en) | 2022-10-20 | 2024-04-25 | Continental Automotive Technologies GmbH | Method and system for monitoring and controlling road users in a traffic area |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1376511A1 (en) * | 2002-06-14 | 2004-01-02 | Boormans, Johannes Godefrides Maria | Computer controlled system concerning dynamic speed advice for motor vehicles |
DE10244205A1 (en) | 2002-09-23 | 2004-03-25 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Vehicle collision prevention method for preventing collision between motor vehicles uses sensors to detect a vehicle's surroundings and its amount of movement |
DE102004035856A1 (en) * | 2003-08-14 | 2005-03-10 | Roland Bittner | Electrical auxiliary device for use in a traffic system, e.g. a traffic data collection system or traffic warning system, whereby the device is mounted at least partially in a mounting tube or pipe of existing infrastructure |
DE102005020429A1 (en) | 2005-04-29 | 2006-11-09 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method and device to support driver when crossing an intersection divide crossing into many zones arranged on the street and determine the navigability of each on the basis of surrounding information |
DE102006057741A1 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2007-09-06 | Siemens Restraint Systems Gmbh | Method for providing safety-relevant data especially in road traffic systems uses stationary data processing unit to determine moving behaviour of vehicles or other objects for data analysis to transmit evaluation of dangerous situation |
DE102007015032A1 (en) | 2007-03-29 | 2008-01-10 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method for evaluating how critical driving situation is comprises calculating possible accelerations and decelerations for vehicle and object whose paths are set to cross and deducing time periods in which their paths would overlap |
US8427341B2 (en) * | 2007-07-29 | 2013-04-23 | Yonatan Yulevich | System and method for providing road information in advance |
US8330622B2 (en) * | 2007-08-30 | 2012-12-11 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Traffic guidance system |
DE102010033008A1 (en) | 2010-07-31 | 2011-03-17 | Daimler Ag | Method for operating collision preventing system of vehicle, involves recording present driving area between vehicle and potential collision partner by recording unit |
DE102011106828B4 (en) * | 2011-07-07 | 2013-07-04 | Audi Ag | Method for providing track data in a motor vehicle, as well as a floor-mounted device |
DE102012009297A1 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2012-12-13 | Daimler Ag | Method for assisting rider when feeding e.g. vehicle, involves proving information, warning and automatic engagement, which results during risk of collision and/or secondary collision with highest priority in priority list |
-
2013
- 2013-08-24 DE DE201310014157 patent/DE102013014157A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-07-26 WO PCT/EP2014/002044 patent/WO2015028114A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-07-26 EP EP14744467.3A patent/EP3036727B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11507109B2 (en) | 2019-04-17 | 2022-11-22 | Toyota Research Institute, Inc. | Signaling autonomous vehicles |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102013014157A1 (en) | 2015-02-26 |
EP3036727A1 (en) | 2016-06-29 |
WO2015028114A1 (en) | 2015-03-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2695797B1 (en) | Method for driverless movement of a vehicle on a parking lot | |
WO2018086784A1 (en) | Driver assistance system for a motor vehicle | |
DE112017006397B4 (en) | system for a vehicle | |
EP2464992B1 (en) | Collision monitoring for vehicle | |
WO2016162256A1 (en) | Control system and method for allowing another motor vehicle to pull in front from a neighboring lane during acc operation of one's own motor vehicle | |
EP1486933A1 (en) | Driver assistance System | |
WO2016184719A1 (en) | Method and system for controlling a drive function of a vehicle | |
EP3157793B1 (en) | Determining a state of a vehicle and assisting a driver in driving the vehicle | |
EP3036727B1 (en) | Stationary device for reducing the risk of a collision between motor vehicles | |
DE102016000199A1 (en) | Control system and method for determining a safe lane change by motor vehicles | |
DE102014223744A1 (en) | Assistance system for detecting driving obstacles occurring in the vicinity of a vehicle | |
EP3280625A1 (en) | Control system and method for assisting motor vehicles in safely pulling in after overtaking | |
DE102013220430A1 (en) | Method and system for identifying a dangerous situation and use of the system | |
DE102014215273A1 (en) | Control of a motor vehicle | |
DE102018203063A1 (en) | Collision risk-prediction unit | |
DE102015221911A1 (en) | Driver assistance system | |
DE102011084549A1 (en) | Method for assisting a driver of a vehicle during a parking process from a transverse parking space | |
EP1887540B1 (en) | Device and method for avoiding rear-end collisions | |
WO2017220176A1 (en) | Method for determining an emergency braking situation of a vehicle and emergency brake system | |
DE102011013486A1 (en) | Driver assistance system for vehicle e.g. motor car, initiates braking process when calculated probability of collision with respect to object crosses threshold value | |
DE102006057751A1 (en) | Method for collision avoidance of vehicles with objects | |
DE102012023108A1 (en) | Method for operating driver assistance system of motor car, involves transmitting lane change information wirelessly to other motor car in environment of own motor car | |
EP2212175B1 (en) | Method and system for increasing the safety in a motor vehicle | |
DE102018121312A1 (en) | Method for partially automated operation of a vehicle and driver assistance system | |
DE102015008263A1 (en) | Method and device for assisting a driver in driving a vehicle |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160324 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170105 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: ZADEMACH, MARTIN Inventor name: MERGL, CHRISTIAN |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 876287 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170415 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502014003060 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170615 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170616 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170615 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170717 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170715 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502014003060 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20171218 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170726 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170726 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170315 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 876287 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20190726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190726 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20220716 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220731 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20220726 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230530 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502014003060 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20230726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20240201 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230731 |