EP3035311B1 - Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same - Google Patents
Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3035311B1 EP3035311B1 EP14199238.8A EP14199238A EP3035311B1 EP 3035311 B1 EP3035311 B1 EP 3035311B1 EP 14199238 A EP14199238 A EP 14199238A EP 3035311 B1 EP3035311 B1 EP 3035311B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- bus
- master
- devices
- time signal
- hazard
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Revoked
Links
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/01—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium
- G08B25/04—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems characterised by the transmission medium using a single signalling line, e.g. in a closed loop
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the bus master device.
- Hazard alarming systems are used for detecting and communicating a hazardous situation, like a fire, to persons within a building. These systems usually comprise a plurality of hazard alarming devices like flash lights or speakers for communicating the hazardous situation and/or other devices, like smoke detectors, fire detectors, burglar detectors and so on coupled to a common bus.
- hazard alarming devices like flash lights or speakers for communicating the hazardous situation and/or other devices, like smoke detectors, fire detectors, burglar detectors and so on coupled to a common bus.
- the hazard alarming devices are coupled to the bus supplying control signals and optionally power to the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices.
- the bus is additionally coupled to a bus master device supplying the bus with the control signals and/or the power and for receiving information from the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices.
- the information provided to the bus master device from the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices can include e.g. information regarding the operation failure conditions, like short circuits.
- the system can be formed so as to comprise a plurality of bus master devices, each one with his one bus and his own plurality of hazard alarming devices and/or other devices.
- the bus master devices are connected via a second bus with a common central control device, which is used for a central control of the system and for informing a user about the actual configuration and status of the system.
- DE 10 2005 062 129 A1 discloses a system, where a plurality of hazard detecting devices are shown, which are connected to respective buses and respective bus master devices, which in turn are connected via a second bus to a central control unit.
- DE 100 00 303 B4 or DE 100 53 525 A1 disclose a system comprising a bus and a plurality of bus members configured to synchronize with a master clock.
- the aim of these document is to control the communication times of the bus members so as to avoid data collisions, respectively so as to ensure a better use of the bus over the time and therefore a very accurate synchronization is required.
- These documents are not directed to hazard alarming systems.
- IEEE 1588 PTP Precision Time Protocol
- IEEE 1588 PTP Precision Time Protocol
- WO 2013 055 599 A1 discloses a system and method for synchronizing a plurality of networked fire alarm panels.
- a plurality of fire panels i.e., nodes
- One node is designated as a SyncHost, and the remaining nodes are periodically reset to the clock time associated with the SyncHost to ensure all nodes remain substantially synchronized to a single time.
- the visual notification devices i.e., strobe lights
- the bus master device for controlling the operation of at least one hazard alarming device comprising a first interface for connecting a first bus coupled with the least one hazard alarming device, a second interface for connecting a second bus coupled with a central control device, and an internal time determining device for determining a local time signal to be used to control an alarm operation of the at least one hazard alarming device, wherein the bus master device further comprises synchronisation means for receiving a master time signal from the central control device via the second bus and for controlling the local time signal based on the master time signal.
- the synchronisation means is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the local time signal is set to the same value as the received master time signal.
- the synchronisation means is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the internal time determining device is accelerated or delayed.
- a hazard alarming system comprising a central control device for generating a master time signal, a plurality of master bus devices, a plurality of hazard alarming devices, a plurality of first buses coupling hazard alarming devices out of the plurality of hazard alarming devices with respective once of the plurality of master bus devices, and a second bus coupling the plurality of master bus devices and the central control device, wherein at least two of the master bus devices are each formed so as to comprise a first interface for connecting a first bus coupled with the least one hazard alarming device, a second interface for connecting a second bus coupled with a central control device, and an internal time determining device for determining a local time signal to be used to control an alarm operation of the at least one hazard alarming device, wherein the bus master device further comprises synchronisation means for receiving a master time signal from the central control device via the second bus and for controlling the local time signal based on the master time signal.
- the hazard alarming system comprises a plurality of second buses coupling respective master bus devices, wherein the central control device is configured to generate the same master time signal for the plurality of second buses.
- the plurality of hazard alarming devices includes a plurality of optical alarming devices for emitting flash lights, and the optical alarming devices are coupled with various master bus devices through various first buses.
- Fig. 1 discloses a hazard alarming system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention.
- a plurality of first buses 1 are formed as loops connecting a plurality of hazard alarming devices 3 and/or other devices - like smoke detectors or flame detectors - with the respective bus master device 17.
- a typical example of a bus 1 is configured as a two wired bus transmitting both, the power for the operation of the hazard alarming devices as well as the signals, to respectively from the hazard alarming devices.
- the bus 1 is not limited to a loop design, other designs, as a branch line or multiple branch lines connected to the bus master device are possible as well.
- the bus 1 is connecting a plurality of hazard alarming devices 3.
- hazard alarming devices are acoustical hazard alarming devices, optical hazard alarming devices or loudspeakers for emitting voice messages.
- the system is not limited to these hazard alarming devices and other suitable means might be implemented, for example combinations of acoustical and optical hazard alarming devices.
- bus 1 might further connect hazard detecting devices, like smoke sensors, flame sensors, gas sensors, cameras, burglar alarm devices and so on.
- hazard detecting devices like smoke sensors, flame sensors, gas sensors, cameras, burglar alarm devices and so on.
- relay devices for operating mechanical apparatuses of the surveillance area, like doors, windows or ventilation openings.
- the bus 1 is not limited to wire bounded buses, but can include an interface for a wireless transmission, so that individual hazard alarming devices 3 or hazard detecting devices can be installed at remote places, where no wire connection is available.
- the bus 1 is connected with and controlled by a bus master device 17.
- a typical bus master device 17 comprises a first interface 15 for connecting the first bus 1, which as mentioned above is coupled with at least one hazard alarming device 3.
- the bus master device 17 comprises an internal time determining device 11 for determining a local time signal. This local time signal will be used to control the operation of the at least one hazard alarming device 3 connected through the bus 1 with the bus master device 17.
- the bus master device 17 further comprises a second interface 5 for connecting the bus master device 17 to a second bus 7. Additionally, the bus master device 17 comprises a synchronisation means 13 for receiving a master time signal via the second bus 7 and for controlling the internal time determining device 11 so as to control the local time signal based on the master time signal.
- the second bus can be any kind of bus, like a two wired proprietary field bus, an Ethernet bus, a wireless local area network bus or an optical bus.
- the second bus is configured to connect a plurality of bus master devices 17 and a central control device 9.
- the central control device 9 can be either a dedicated central control device 9, as shown in Fig. 1 , or can be one of the bus master devices, which by internal setting of the system has been assigned to function as central control device 9.
- the first bus 1 can connect up to 250 bus devices, like hazard alarming devices 3, and might have a communication rate of for example 6250 Bit/SEC like the FlexES® bus of the applicant of the present application and might have a length of up to 3 kilometres using a standard twisted pair of telephone wires.
- the second bus 7 can be for example a CAN-bus having a transmission speed of 1M Bit/SEC and might be configured to connect up to 80 master bus devices 17.
- the system has a further top level control, so that a plurality of central control devices 9 are connected with a main control unit 19, an example for that interconnection of the central control devices 9 is implemented under the trademark "ESSERNET®" using dedicated cable and having a transmission speed of for example 500 kBit/SEC.
- the ESSERNET® allows to connect up to 31 central control devices 9 and a dedicated main control unit 19.
- Fig. 1 can cover a large area in a huge building like an airport or a train station with appropriate hazard alarming devices 3.
- the present invention proposes to control the operation of the hazard alarming devices 3 so as to operate in a synchronised manner.
- optical alarming devices which are driven in a pulsed fashion it is helpful, if these devices are driven with a more or less synchronised clock. Even more important is that the synchronisation should be provided for voice alarming devices or acoustical alarming devices. In this case time differences of 20 ms can be noticed and a voice message transmitted through the hazard alarming devices might be difficult to understand, if the time difference exceeds this limit.
- the present invention suggests to assign a master clock for the system.
- the master clock will provide a time signal which will be distributed through the network.
- a special accuracy of the master clock is not required, since any deviation of the master time vis-à-vis the real time will be distributed through the entire system and therefore will not affect the overall operation. In other words, whether a second as determined by a master clock corresponds exactly to one second is not relevant, since deviations of the master time from the real time have no influence on the operation of the system.
- the master clock might be provided by the main control unit 19.
- the main control unit 19 will transmit a master time signal through a bus connecting the main control unit 19 and the respective central control devices 9.
- the central control devices 9 will receive the master time signal and use this signal to synchronise their own internal clocks.
- synchronised internal clocks will be used to send a derived master time signal through the second bus 7 to the individual bus master devices 17.
- the synchronisation means 13 of the respective bus master device 17 synchronise the internal clock of the bus master device 17 and will use the thus synchronised local time signal for controlling the operation of the hazard alarming devices 3.
- the master time signal of the main control unit might comprise 32 bit, which can represent a counter in steps of milliseconds.
- the lowest bit, i.e. bit 0, represents 1 millisecond
- the next bit, i.e. bit 1 represents 2 milliseconds
- the next bit, i.e. bit 2 represents 4 milliseconds... and so on.
- the main control unit 19 will be configured to send a synchronisation message at regular intervals or at special events transmitting the master time signal to the respective central control devices 9.
- the actual time period between the transmission of two consecutive synchronisation messages depends on the accuracy of the local clocks of the central control devices 9. Typically, with an external resonator, it will be enough to transmit the synchronisation message every 30 seconds.
- each central control device 9 of each central control device 9 will continue to determine a derived master time signal independently by an appropriate counter within the central control device 9, which will be set by the local clock of the respective central control device 9.
- the central control devices 9 have high precision clocks a longer time interval between two synchronisation messages will be possible.
- the clock of the central control devices 9 is less accurate, a shorter time interval will be necessary.
- each central control device 9 Upon synchronising the central control device 9 will have a derived master time signal. Each central control device 9 will upon synchronising the internal clock transmit the derived master time signal though the bus 7 to the bus master devices 17 as a signal of 32 Bit or less.
- the derived master time signal will be shorter, for example will have only 29 Bits or 28 Bits and will therefore represent only a signal with an accuracy of 8 milliseconds or 16 milliseconds.
- the respective bus master devices 17 Upon receiving the derived master time signal the respective bus master devices 17 will synchronise their local clocks and will transmit any operation instructions and control signals to the hazard alarming devices 3 based on the synchronised local time signal.
- the first approach is a hard synchronisation.
- the hard synchronisation will be explained for the synchronisation of the derived master time signal with the main master time signal.
- the central control device 9 will upon receiving the main master time signal overwrite the internal counter value with the received value of the main master time signal and will continue the operation based on the new time value.
- This system has the advantage of achieving a very fast synchronisation of the clocks and can be implemented in a simple manner.
- the same hard synchronisation method can be used for synchronising the clocks of a master bus device 9 with the derived master time signal.
- time interval of transmitting synchronisation message between the main control and the central control devices 9 is the same as the time interval used for transmitting a synchronisation message between a central control device 9 and the respective bus master devices 17.
- time intervals are independent from each other and should be selected depending on the accuracy of the respective clocks so as to allow a synchronisation of less than 20 milliseconds over the entire system. As mentioned above typically a time interval of 30 seconds for both cases should be possible, so as not to impose a too high load on the transfer allowed on the respective buses.
- the receiving device that is either the central control device 9 receiving the main master time signal from the main control unit 19, or the master bus device 17, receiving the derived master time signal from the central control device 9, will compare the local time signal and the received master time signal.
- the synchronisation is only done in values of e.g. 1 ms, which is far larger than the operation step of the typical internal clock of a CPU, it is easy to either accelerate or slow down the internal clock in units of 1 ms. Depending on the extent of the slowing down or accelerating of the internal clock after a couple of synchronisation messages the synchronisation of two time signals, i.e. the local time signal and the master time signal, will have been reached.
- the extent of acceleration or slowing down of the internal clock is selected depending on the actual difference between the master time signal and the local time signal. If the difference is large the extent of acceleration/slowing down is selected to be large, whereas, if the difference is small, the amount of acceleration/ slowing down is selected to be small. This can be done in 3 different steps, for example. However any other number of steps might be selected at need.
- the advantage of the soft synchronisation is that the time signal, either the derived master time signal or the local time signal, will be a continuous count assuming each value without gaps or repetitions.
- a bus device like a hazard alarming device 3 might take only 8 or 16 bits out of the 32 bit signal of the time signal distributed by the bus master device 17.
- the 8 bits might correspond to a time of 8 milliseconds, 16 milliseconds and up to 2048 milliseconds. This is preferred if the hazard alarming device 3 connected to the bus 1 makes use a simple 8 bit controller and it is not necessary to archive a precision which goes beyond the 8 ms provided by this clock.
- all the hazard alarming devices 3 will be synchronised with the corresponding accuracy of 20 ms, regardless whether they are connected with the same bus 1 or connected to different buses 1, which in turn might be connected to different central control devices 9.
- a user will always view and hear the alarm message in a synchronised manner, even if he observes signals emitted from a plurality of hazard alarming devices 3 connected to different busses 1 within the system.
- the invention is not limited to a 32 bit time signal, neither for the main master time signal nor for the derived master time signal nor for the local time signal. If desired a 64 bit time signal or a 16 bit time signal might be used instead.
- the invention is not limited to time intervals of 30 seconds between synchronisation messages. Different time intervals can be used at the different levels.
- time interval between two consecutive synchronisation messages of the main control unit 19 can be set at 1 minute or at 20 seconds, depending on the respective requirements of the accuracy of the desired synchronisation and the accuracy of the local clocks of the central control devices 9.
- the time intervals used by the central control devices 9 to transmit their derived master time signal to the bus master devices 17 can be the same for the entire system or may be set individually for each central control unit 9. This setting can be done under the control of the main control unit 19.
- the individual devices of the system can be programmed so as to ignore some of the synchronisation messages, if they do not require the corresponding accuracy.
- a bus master device 17 can be programmed to ignore every second synchronisation message.
- system can be implemented by combining hard and soft synchronisation. For example it might be possible to perform hard synchronisation between the main control unit 19 and the central control devices 17, and to perform soft synchronisation between the central control devices 9 and all or some of the bus master devices 17.
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Alarm Systems (AREA)
- Small-Scale Networks (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the bus master device.
- Hazard alarming systems are used for detecting and communicating a hazardous situation, like a fire, to persons within a building. These systems usually comprise a plurality of hazard alarming devices like flash lights or speakers for communicating the hazardous situation and/or other devices, like smoke detectors, fire detectors, burglar detectors and so on coupled to a common bus.
- The hazard alarming devices are coupled to the bus supplying control signals and optionally power to the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices. The bus is additionally coupled to a bus master device supplying the bus with the control signals and/or the power and for receiving information from the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices. The information provided to the bus master device from the hazard alarming devices and/or other devices can include e.g. information regarding the operation failure conditions, like short circuits.
- The system can be formed so as to comprise a plurality of bus master devices, each one with his one bus and his own plurality of hazard alarming devices and/or other devices. In this case the bus master devices are connected via a second bus with a common central control device, which is used for a central control of the system and for informing a user about the actual configuration and status of the system.
-
DE 10 2005 062 129 A1 discloses a system, where a plurality of hazard detecting devices are shown, which are connected to respective buses and respective bus master devices, which in turn are connected via a second bus to a central control unit. - In some cases it might occur that the same spatial area is exposed to an emission of sound or light from hazard alarming devices connected to different bus master devices. A user observing the sound or light might feel uncomfortable in case of receiving deviating signals from the two or more hazard alarming devices at the same time.
-
DE 100 00 303 B4 orDE 100 53 525 A1 disclose a system comprising a bus and a plurality of bus members configured to synchronize with a master clock. The aim of these document is to control the communication times of the bus members so as to avoid data collisions, respectively so as to ensure a better use of the bus over the time and therefore a very accurate synchronization is required. These documents are not directed to hazard alarming systems. - IEEE 1588 PTP (Precision Time Protocol) is a protocol used to synchronize clocks throughout a computer network. On a local area network, it achieves clock accuracy in the submicrosecond range, making it suitable for measurement and control systems. This document is not related to hazard alarming systems, either.
-
WO 2013 055 599 A1 discloses a system and method for synchronizing a plurality of networked fire alarm panels. A plurality of fire panels (i.e., nodes) are arranged on a token ring network. One node is designated as a SyncHost, and the remaining nodes are periodically reset to the clock time associated with the SyncHost to ensure all nodes remain substantially synchronized to a single time. As such, when an alarm condition is signaled, the visual notification devices (i.e., strobe lights) of all the fire panels (nodes) will flash at substantially the same time, in accordance with government guidelines. - It is an object to provide a bus master device and a hazard alarming system which can provide a more convenient alarming action for a user.
- According to the present invention the above object is achieved by a bus master device according to claim 1 and by a hazard alarming system according to claim 4. The dependent claims are directed to different advantageous aspects of the invention.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the bus master device for controlling the operation of at least one hazard alarming device comprising a first interface for connecting a first bus coupled with the least one hazard alarming device, a second interface for connecting a second bus coupled with a central control device, and an internal time determining device for determining a local time signal to be used to control an alarm operation of the at least one hazard alarming device, wherein the bus master device further comprises synchronisation means for receiving a master time signal from the central control device via the second bus and for controlling the local time signal based on the master time signal.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the synchronisation means is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the local time signal is set to the same value as the received master time signal.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the synchronisation means is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the internal time determining device is accelerated or delayed.
- According to an embodiment of the invention there is provided a hazard alarming system comprising a central control device for generating a master time signal, a plurality of master bus devices, a plurality of hazard alarming devices, a plurality of first buses coupling hazard alarming devices out of the plurality of hazard alarming devices with respective once of the plurality of master bus devices, and a second bus coupling the plurality of master bus devices and the central control device, wherein at least two of the master bus devices are each formed so as to comprise a first interface for connecting a first bus coupled with the least one hazard alarming device, a second interface for connecting a second bus coupled with a central control device, and an internal time determining device for determining a local time signal to be used to control an alarm operation of the at least one hazard alarming device, wherein the bus master device further comprises synchronisation means for receiving a master time signal from the central control device via the second bus and for controlling the local time signal based on the master time signal.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the hazard alarming system comprises a plurality of second buses coupling respective master bus devices, wherein the central control device is configured to generate the same master time signal for the plurality of second buses.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the plurality of hazard alarming devices includes a plurality of optical alarming devices for emitting flash lights, and the optical alarming devices are coupled with various master bus devices through various first buses.
- In the following different preferred embodiments of the invention will be described with regard to the accompanying drawings, which show:
- Fig. 1
- an overall view of a hazard alarming system according to an embodiment of the invention; and
- Fig. 2
- a detailed block diagram of a bus master according to an embodiment of the invention.
-
Fig. 1 discloses a hazard alarming system according to a preferred embodiment of the invention. A plurality of first buses 1 are formed as loops connecting a plurality of hazardalarming devices 3 and/or other devices - like smoke detectors or flame detectors - with the respectivebus master device 17. - A typical example of a bus 1 is configured as a two wired bus transmitting both, the power for the operation of the hazard alarming devices as well as the signals, to respectively from the hazard alarming devices.
- The bus 1 is not limited to a loop design, other designs, as a branch line or multiple branch lines connected to the bus master device are possible as well.
- The bus 1 is connecting a plurality of hazard
alarming devices 3. Examples of hazard alarming devices are acoustical hazard alarming devices, optical hazard alarming devices or loudspeakers for emitting voice messages. However, the system is not limited to these hazard alarming devices and other suitable means might be implemented, for example combinations of acoustical and optical hazard alarming devices. - Additionally and as mentioned above the bus might further connect hazard detecting devices, like smoke sensors, flame sensors, gas sensors, cameras, burglar alarm devices and so on. Finally, it is possible to connect relay devices for operating mechanical apparatuses of the surveillance area, like doors, windows or ventilation openings. Finally, the bus 1 is not limited to wire bounded buses, but can include an interface for a wireless transmission, so that individual hazard
alarming devices 3 or hazard detecting devices can be installed at remote places, where no wire connection is available. - Even if not shown in detail, for cases where a hazard
alarming device 3 or hazard detecting device has to reach an explosion proof area, it is possible that the bus is divided in galvanic isolated sections. - The bus 1 is connected with and controlled by a
bus master device 17. A typicalbus master device 17 comprises afirst interface 15 for connecting the first bus 1, which as mentioned above is coupled with at least one hazardalarming device 3. - As shown in
Fig. 2 thebus master device 17 comprises an internaltime determining device 11 for determining a local time signal. This local time signal will be used to control the operation of the at least one hazardalarming device 3 connected through the bus 1 with thebus master device 17. - According to the present invention the
bus master device 17 further comprises asecond interface 5 for connecting thebus master device 17 to a second bus 7. Additionally, thebus master device 17 comprises a synchronisation means 13 for receiving a master time signal via the second bus 7 and for controlling the internaltime determining device 11 so as to control the local time signal based on the master time signal. - The second bus can be any kind of bus, like a two wired proprietary field bus, an Ethernet bus, a wireless local area network bus or an optical bus. The second bus is configured to connect a plurality of
bus master devices 17 and acentral control device 9. Thecentral control device 9 can be either a dedicatedcentral control device 9, as shown inFig. 1 , or can be one of the bus master devices, which by internal setting of the system has been assigned to function ascentral control device 9. - The first bus 1 can connect up to 250 bus devices, like hazard
alarming devices 3, and might have a communication rate of for example 6250 Bit/SEC like the FlexES® bus of the applicant of the present application and might have a length of up to 3 kilometres using a standard twisted pair of telephone wires. - The second bus 7 can be for example a CAN-bus having a transmission speed of 1M Bit/SEC and might be configured to connect up to 80
master bus devices 17. - As shown in
Fig. 1 the system has a further top level control, so that a plurality ofcentral control devices 9 are connected with amain control unit 19, an example for that interconnection of thecentral control devices 9 is implemented under the trademark "ESSERNET®" using dedicated cable and having a transmission speed of for example 500 kBit/SEC. The ESSERNET® allows to connect up to 31central control devices 9 and a dedicatedmain control unit 19. - As described the system in
Fig. 1 can cover a large area in a huge building like an airport or a train station with appropriate hazardalarming devices 3. - In case of an alarm it might happen at any position within the installation that a person will be alarmed by hazard
alarming devices 3 connected with differentbus masters devices 17, which in turn might be connected with the same or even with differentcentral control units 9. If in this case the hazard alarming devices emit their alarming signals in an un-synchronised manner, it might be difficult or even impossible to correctly identify the alarming signal, and the person, to which the alarm is directed, might be miss leaded. - Therefore, the present invention proposes to control the operation of the hazard
alarming devices 3 so as to operate in a synchronised manner. - Especially in the case of using optical alarming devices which are driven in a pulsed fashion it is helpful, if these devices are driven with a more or less synchronised clock. Even more important is that the synchronisation should be provided for voice alarming devices or acoustical alarming devices. In this case time differences of 20 ms can be noticed and a voice message transmitted through the hazard alarming devices might be difficult to understand, if the time difference exceeds this limit.
- The present invention suggests to assign a master clock for the system. The master clock will provide a time signal which will be distributed through the network. A special accuracy of the master clock is not required, since any deviation of the master time vis-à-vis the real time will be distributed through the entire system and therefore will not affect the overall operation. In other words, whether a second as determined by a master clock corresponds exactly to one second is not relevant, since deviations of the master time from the real time have no influence on the operation of the system.
- In the preferred embodiment described in
Fig. 1 the master clock might be provided by themain control unit 19. Themain control unit 19 will transmit a master time signal through a bus connecting themain control unit 19 and the respectivecentral control devices 9. Thecentral control devices 9 will receive the master time signal and use this signal to synchronise their own internal clocks. Thus synchronised internal clocks will be used to send a derived master time signal through the second bus 7 to the individualbus master devices 17. Upon receiving this derived master time signal the synchronisation means 13 of the respectivebus master device 17 will synchronise the internal clock of thebus master device 17 and will use the thus synchronised local time signal for controlling the operation of the hazardalarming devices 3. - In a preferred embodiment the master time signal of the main control unit might comprise 32 bit, which can represent a counter in steps of milliseconds. The lowest bit, i.e. bit 0, represents 1 millisecond, the next bit, i.e. bit 1, represents 2 milliseconds, the next bit, i.e. bit 2, represents 4 milliseconds... and so on. The
main control unit 19 will be configured to send a synchronisation message at regular intervals or at special events transmitting the master time signal to the respectivecentral control devices 9. - The actual time period between the transmission of two consecutive synchronisation messages depends on the accuracy of the local clocks of the
central control devices 9. Typically, with an external resonator, it will be enough to transmit the synchronisation message every 30 seconds. - In the time period between the two transmissions of the synchronisation message by the main control unit each
central control device 9 of eachcentral control device 9 will continue to determine a derived master time signal independently by an appropriate counter within thecentral control device 9, which will be set by the local clock of the respectivecentral control device 9. Of course, if thecentral control devices 9 have high precision clocks a longer time interval between two synchronisation messages will be possible. On the other hand, if the clock of thecentral control devices 9 is less accurate, a shorter time interval will be necessary. - Upon synchronising the
central control device 9 will have a derived master time signal. Eachcentral control device 9 will upon synchronising the internal clock transmit the derived master time signal though the bus 7 to thebus master devices 17 as a signal of 32 Bit or less. - If the time required for the synchronisation in the
central control devices 9 is larger than one millisecond the derived master time signal will be shorter, for example will have only 29 Bits or 28 Bits and will therefore represent only a signal with an accuracy of 8 milliseconds or 16 milliseconds. - Upon receiving the derived master time signal the respective
bus master devices 17 will synchronise their local clocks and will transmit any operation instructions and control signals to the hazardalarming devices 3 based on the synchronised local time signal. - For the synchronisation of the clock of a
master bus device 17 with the derived master time signal or for the synchronisation of the clock of acentral control device 9 with the main master time signal two different approaches will be explained. - The first approach is a hard synchronisation. The hard synchronisation will be explained for the synchronisation of the derived master time signal with the main master time signal.
- The
central control device 9 will upon receiving the main master time signal overwrite the internal counter value with the received value of the main master time signal and will continue the operation based on the new time value. This system has the advantage of achieving a very fast synchronisation of the clocks and can be implemented in a simple manner. - The same hard synchronisation method can be used for synchronising the clocks of a
master bus device 9 with the derived master time signal. - Noted apart, it is not necessary that the time interval of transmitting synchronisation message between the main control and the
central control devices 9 is the same as the time interval used for transmitting a synchronisation message between acentral control device 9 and the respectivebus master devices 17. These time intervals are independent from each other and should be selected depending on the accuracy of the respective clocks so as to allow a synchronisation of less than 20 milliseconds over the entire system. As mentioned above typically a time interval of 30 seconds for both cases should be possible, so as not to impose a too high load on the transfer allowed on the respective buses. - As an alternative to the described hard synchronisation a soft synchronisation might be used.
- As described above, in case of a hard synchronisation the count value of the internal clock of a
central control device 9 or abus master device 17 is overwritten. This means that there might be gaps in the series of values taken by the counter of the internal clock or that certain count values may be repeated due to the overwriting. - However, it might be that such a certain count value, which is skipped due to the hard synchronisation, should be used to trigger an operation of one of the devices. This means, that in worst case an operation of one of the devices will not start or end at all.
- In the case that the certain count value designated for triggering an operation is not skipped, but repeated, the operation will be started twice, which might lead to operation errors of the entire system. This drawback is avoided by the soft synchronisation method in which case the synchronisation is done by accelerating or slowing down the local clocks.
- For doing so the receiving device, that is either the
central control device 9 receiving the main master time signal from themain control unit 19, or themaster bus device 17, receiving the derived master time signal from thecentral control device 9, will compare the local time signal and the received master time signal. - If the comparison shows that the two signals match no action will be required.
- In case comparison shows that that the two signals deviate from each other the local time will either be accelerated or slowed down.
- Since the synchronisation is only done in values of e.g. 1 ms, which is far larger than the operation step of the typical internal clock of a CPU, it is easy to either accelerate or slow down the internal clock in units of 1 ms. Depending on the extent of the slowing down or accelerating of the internal clock after a couple of synchronisation messages the synchronisation of two time signals, i.e. the local time signal and the master time signal, will have been reached.
- In an preferred embodiment the extent of acceleration or slowing down of the internal clock is selected depending on the actual difference between the master time signal and the local time signal. If the difference is large the extent of acceleration/slowing down is selected to be large, whereas, if the difference is small, the amount of acceleration/ slowing down is selected to be small. This can be done in 3 different steps, for example. However any other number of steps might be selected at need.
- The advantage of the soft synchronisation is that the time signal, either the derived master time signal or the local time signal, will be a continuous count assuming each value without gaps or repetitions.
- Finally, it is possible to combine both methods for synchronisation, i.e. the hard synchronisation and the soft synchronisation. For example it will be possible to perform the hard synchronisation once, for example during the start up of the system, or once a day, and after the hard synchronisation to keep the times signals matching to each other by means of a soft synchronisation.
- The system allows a high degree of flexibility in so far as that it is not required to have the same synchronisation level in each part thereof. For example a bus device, like a hazard
alarming device 3 might take only 8 or 16 bits out of the 32 bit signal of the time signal distributed by thebus master device 17. The 8 bits might correspond to a time of 8 milliseconds, 16 milliseconds and up to 2048 milliseconds. This is preferred if the hazardalarming device 3 connected to the bus 1 makes use a simple 8 bit controller and it is not necessary to archive a precision which goes beyond the 8 ms provided by this clock. - According to the invention all the hazard
alarming devices 3 will be synchronised with the corresponding accuracy of 20 ms, regardless whether they are connected with the same bus 1 or connected to different buses 1, which in turn might be connected to differentcentral control devices 9. - A user will always view and hear the alarm message in a synchronised manner, even if he observes signals emitted from a plurality of hazard
alarming devices 3 connected to different busses 1 within the system. - The invention is not limited to a 32 bit time signal, neither for the main master time signal nor for the derived master time signal nor for the local time signal. If desired a 64 bit time signal or a 16 bit time signal might be used instead.
- Furthermore, the invention is not limited to time intervals of 30 seconds between synchronisation messages. Different time intervals can be used at the different levels.
- For example the time interval between two consecutive synchronisation messages of the
main control unit 19 can be set at 1 minute or at 20 seconds, depending on the respective requirements of the accuracy of the desired synchronisation and the accuracy of the local clocks of thecentral control devices 9. - The time intervals used by the
central control devices 9 to transmit their derived master time signal to thebus master devices 17 can be the same for the entire system or may be set individually for eachcentral control unit 9. This setting can be done under the control of themain control unit 19. - Furthermore, the individual devices of the system can be programmed so as to ignore some of the synchronisation messages, if they do not require the corresponding accuracy. For example a
bus master device 17 can be programmed to ignore every second synchronisation message. - Additionally, the system can be implemented by combining hard and soft synchronisation. For example it might be possible to perform hard synchronisation between the
main control unit 19 and thecentral control devices 17, and to perform soft synchronisation between thecentral control devices 9 and all or some of thebus master devices 17.
Claims (6)
- Bus master device for controlling the operation of at least one hazard alarming device (3) comprising:a first interface (15) for connecting a first bus (1) coupled with the least one hazard alarming device (3), ;a second interface (5) for connecting a second bus (7) coupled with a central control device (9), the second bus (7) being a CAN bus, an Ethernet bus, a wireless local area network bus or an optical bus, the second bus (7) being configured to connect a plurality of bus master devices in parallel;an internal time determining device (11) for determining a local time signal to be used to control an alarm operation of the at least one hazard alarming device (3); and
synchronisation means (13) for receiving a master time signal from the central control device (9) via the second bus (7) and for controlling the local time signal based on the master time signal. - Bus master device according to claim 1, wherein:
the synchronisation means (13) is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the local time signal is set to the same value as the received master time signal. - Bus master device according to claim 1, wherein:
the synchronisation means (13) is configured to control the local time signal so that upon receiving the master time signal the internal time determining device (11) is accelerated or delayed. - Hazard alarming system comprising:a central control device (9) for generating a master time signal;a plurality of master bus devices (17);a plurality of hazard alarming devices (3);a plurality of first buses (1) coupling hazard alarming devices (3) out of the plurality of hazard alarming devices (3) with respective once of the plurality of master bus devices (17);a second bus (7) coupling the plurality of master bus devices (17) and the central control device (9), the second bus (7) being a CAN bus, an Ethernet bus, a wireless local area network bus or an optical bus, the second bus (7) being configured to connect a plurality of bus master devices in parallel; andat least two of the master bus devices (17) are configured according to any one of claims 1 to 3.
- Hazard alarming system according to claim 4, comprising
a plurality of second buses (7) coupling respective master bus devices (17), wherein the central control device (9) is configured to generate the same master time signal for the plurality of second buses (7). - Hazard alarming system according to any of claims 4 or 5, wherein
the plurality of hazard alarming devices (3) includes a plurality of optical alarming devices (3A) for emitting flash lights, and the optical alarming devices (3A) are coupled with various master bus devices (17) through various first buses (1).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14199238.8A EP3035311B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2014-12-19 | Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14199238.8A EP3035311B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2014-12-19 | Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3035311A1 EP3035311A1 (en) | 2016-06-22 |
EP3035311B1 true EP3035311B1 (en) | 2019-10-09 |
Family
ID=52146245
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14199238.8A Revoked EP3035311B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2014-12-19 | Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3035311B1 (en) |
Citations (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2621209B1 (en) | 1976-05-13 | 1977-07-28 | Preussag Ag Feuerschutz | Alarm device, especially for fire alarms |
EP0327083A2 (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1989-08-09 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbH | Device to operate absolute time clocks in a process control system comprising a central clock and participants |
US5886620A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1999-03-23 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
DE10053525A1 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2002-05-02 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for synchronizing subscribers gives each subscriber waiting to be synchronized an individual timing unit to stay in contact via a communications connection by depending on the synchronization of global times. |
US20050200472A1 (en) | 1995-03-20 | 2005-09-15 | Curran John W. | Apparatus and method for synchronizing visual/audible alarm units in an alarm system |
DE102005062129A1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2007-06-28 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Danger detection system for e.g. hospital, has data link that is established between building management system and evaluation unit by series connection with another evaluation unit over interface of evaluation units |
WO2011113779A1 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-22 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Signal appartus for an alarm installtion, alarm installation and method for operating the signal apparatus |
DE10000303B4 (en) | 2000-01-05 | 2011-09-29 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for exchanging data between at least two subscribers connected to a bus system |
EP2423897A2 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2012-02-29 | Novar GmbH | Hazard notification assembly and method for its operation |
EP2466564A2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2012-06-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method of emergency operation of an alarm system |
CN102807145A (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2012-12-05 | 天津大学 | Wireless network-based elevator fault alarm and diagnosis method and device |
WO2013055599A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Simplexgrinnell Lp | System and method for synchronization of networked fire alarm panels |
WO2013070883A1 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2013-05-16 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Temporal horn pattern synchronization |
DE102011088826A1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Network device for wired data network and for use as fire alarm control panel for fire alarm system, has power output and network interface, which is designed for transmitting data and for receiving power from data network |
DE102012217162A1 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Fire alarm system and fire detection network with a large number of fire alarm systems |
-
2014
- 2014-12-19 EP EP14199238.8A patent/EP3035311B1/en not_active Revoked
Patent Citations (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE2621209B1 (en) | 1976-05-13 | 1977-07-28 | Preussag Ag Feuerschutz | Alarm device, especially for fire alarms |
EP0327083A2 (en) | 1988-02-05 | 1989-08-09 | Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbH | Device to operate absolute time clocks in a process control system comprising a central clock and participants |
US5886620A (en) | 1993-09-24 | 1999-03-23 | Simplex Time Recorder Company | Building alarm system with synchronized strobes |
US20050200472A1 (en) | 1995-03-20 | 2005-09-15 | Curran John W. | Apparatus and method for synchronizing visual/audible alarm units in an alarm system |
DE10000303B4 (en) | 2000-01-05 | 2011-09-29 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for exchanging data between at least two subscribers connected to a bus system |
DE10053525B4 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2012-06-28 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and system for the synchronization of subscribers of a communication connection |
DE10053525A1 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2002-05-02 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method for synchronizing subscribers gives each subscriber waiting to be synchronized an individual timing unit to stay in contact via a communications connection by depending on the synchronization of global times. |
DE102005062129A1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2007-06-28 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Danger detection system for e.g. hospital, has data link that is established between building management system and evaluation unit by series connection with another evaluation unit over interface of evaluation units |
WO2011113779A1 (en) | 2010-03-17 | 2011-09-22 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Signal appartus for an alarm installtion, alarm installation and method for operating the signal apparatus |
EP2423897A2 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2012-02-29 | Novar GmbH | Hazard notification assembly and method for its operation |
EP2466564A2 (en) | 2010-12-16 | 2012-06-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method of emergency operation of an alarm system |
WO2013055599A1 (en) | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Simplexgrinnell Lp | System and method for synchronization of networked fire alarm panels |
WO2013070883A1 (en) | 2011-11-11 | 2013-05-16 | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Temporal horn pattern synchronization |
DE102011088826A1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2013-06-20 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Network device for wired data network and for use as fire alarm control panel for fire alarm system, has power output and network interface, which is designed for transmitting data and for receiving power from data network |
CN102807145A (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2012-12-05 | 天津大学 | Wireless network-based elevator fault alarm and diagnosis method and device |
DE102012217162A1 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2014-03-27 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Fire alarm system and fire detection network with a large number of fire alarm systems |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
ANONYM: "Brandmeldeanlagen - Teil 23: Feueralarmeinrichtungen. Optische Signalgeber; Deutsche Fassung EN 54-23: 2010", DEUTSCHE NORM DIN EN 54-23, 1 June 2010 (2010-06-01), pages 1 - 69, XP055764119 |
ANONYM: "Brandmeldeanlagen - Teil 3: Feueralarmeinrichtungen. Akustische Signalgeber; Deutsche Fassung EN 54-3: 2014", DEUTSCHE NORM DIN EN 54-3, 1 September 2014 (2014-09-01), pages 1 - 80, XP055764123 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3035311A1 (en) | 2016-06-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8553664B2 (en) | Field optimized, configurable wireless fire system | |
CA2873676C (en) | Synchronization of outputs in a wireless fire system | |
JP6029909B2 (en) | Alarm system and alarm device | |
AU2016247180B2 (en) | Synchronization of wirelessly controlled notification devices using wireless communication | |
TWI500309B (en) | Communication apparatus and communication method | |
JP6868820B2 (en) | Relay system and fire alarm system equipped with it | |
JP6670157B2 (en) | Fire alarm system | |
JP2021182445A (en) | Fire alarm system and fire alarm method | |
EP3035311B1 (en) | Bus master device for a hazard alarming system and a hazard alarming system using the same | |
JP2014063207A (en) | Alarm system and alarm device | |
JPH11203564A (en) | Emergency exit guidance system | |
JP2006221405A (en) | Alarm system | |
JP6162854B2 (en) | Light alarm device and light alarm system | |
JP6671228B2 (en) | Fire alarm system | |
EP3245637B1 (en) | Building monitoring system based on light guides | |
US20130162434A1 (en) | Signal apparatus for an alarm installation, alarm installation and method for operating the signal apparatus | |
KR101457473B1 (en) | Building Management System | |
EP2898633B1 (en) | Wired data communications network | |
EP3822930B1 (en) | Synchronized mesh audio communications | |
JP6165472B2 (en) | Alarm system and alarm device | |
JP6503271B2 (en) | Time synchronization system | |
JP2017055418A (en) | Radio communication system | |
JP6546469B2 (en) | Tunnel disaster prevention system | |
KR20170104305A (en) | Relay and synchronization system | |
SU734788A1 (en) | Device for teleindication with time division of signals |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20161215 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20180627 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20190417 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602014054832 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1189716 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20191115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20191009 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1189716 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200110 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200109 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200109 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200210 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200224 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 602014054832 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PG2D | Information on lapse in contracting state deleted |
Ref country code: IS |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200209 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: MINIMAX VIKING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT GMBH Effective date: 20200701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20191231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191219 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191219 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191231 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191231 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20141219 |
|
RDAF | Communication despatched that patent is revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20191009 |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231219 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231226 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R103 Ref document number: 602014054832 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R064 Ref document number: 602014054832 Country of ref document: DE |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
RDAG | Patent revoked |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
27W | Patent revoked |
Effective date: 20240206 |
|
GBPR | Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state |
Effective date: 20240206 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231227 Year of fee payment: 10 |