EP3074137B1 - Method for producing cement - Google Patents
Method for producing cement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3074137B1 EP3074137B1 EP14805222.8A EP14805222A EP3074137B1 EP 3074137 B1 EP3074137 B1 EP 3074137B1 EP 14805222 A EP14805222 A EP 14805222A EP 3074137 B1 EP3074137 B1 EP 3074137B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- cage
- classifiers
- bar
- cement
- ground
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
- B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
- B02C23/00—Auxiliary methods or auxiliary devices or accessories specially adapted for crushing or disintegrating not provided for in preceding groups or not specially adapted to apparatus covered by a single preceding group
- B02C23/08—Separating or sorting of material, associated with crushing or disintegrating
- B02C23/14—Separating or sorting of material, associated with crushing or disintegrating with more than one separator
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for producing a cement, wherein at least one millbase is ground in at least two devices for grinding to different ground millbase with mutually different grain size distributions, the ground millbase separated from each of the at least two devices for grinding separately, each with its own classifying air stream is supplied to one of at least two rod sifters, in each of the at least two rod sifter classified a fine material fraction and a coarse grain fraction is discharged.
- a device for grinding regrind For the production of cement and / or cement raw meal suitable for cement production regrind such as cement clinker, metallurgical or slag sand, limestone and / or gypsum is placed in a device for grinding regrind.
- regrind such as cement clinker, metallurgical or slag sand, limestone and / or gypsum
- HPGR 'high-pressure roller press'
- the material to be removed from the roller presses consists of still existing coarse material and a fine material produced during comminution. For the production of the fine material, it is separated from the coarse material in classifiers.
- a broadened particle size distribution can be achieved by operating at least two similar Kreislaufmahlanlagen. Differences in the roller presses used (in particular in the contact forces) and the rod basket sifters (in particular with regard to speed and dimensions) make it possible to produce different, steep particle size distributions.
- DE 10 2008 019 830 A1 a Umkylzmahlstrom with roller press, static caution and dynamic classifier is known, it being possible to operate in parallel to increase the throughput of several similar systems.
- WO 2009/068465 A1 is a Kreislaufmahlstrom known, which is composed of several roller presses and corresponding classifiers. With such systems, the desired grain size influencing and distribution can be achieved by bringing together the respective light goods.
- the object of the invention is therefore to provide a method for producing a cement, which overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
- At least two grinders at least one grindable material suitable for cement production is ground and that the ground grindbase suspended in separate classifying air streams is in each case supplied pneumatically to a dynamic rod basket sifter.
- a separation of a coarse grain fraction (grits) and a fine grain fraction is achieved.
- the grits are taken away.
- the fine material fractions which are located in the rod basket sifters are discharged from the respective classifying air streams into a common discharge device.
- the classifying air streams flow together.
- the resulting flow field inside the discharge device swirls the fine material particles and leads to a uniform mixing of the fine material fractions from the individual rod basket separators.
- the at least two devices for grinding mutually different millbase for example cement clinker, metallurgical or slag sand, limestone and / or gypsum, is supplied. If at the same time different starting materials are supplied to the devices for grinding as the respective ground material, this can influence the composition of the cement or cement raw meal.
- roller presses As devices for grinding.
- Operating characteristics of roller presses and the nature of the comminuted fresh produce are well known in cement production.
- roller presses lead to steep particle size distribution curves.
- the desired broadened particle size distribution can easily be achieved for the common fine product product.
- two roller presses and two Stabkorbsichtern a composition of a coarser and a finer fines content in the common fines product is produced, resulting in a high strength of cement.
- the inventive method is not limited to the use of roller presses. It is possible, in their place, to use other devices known from cement production for grinding regrind, in particular ball mills (tube mills), vertical mills and impact hammer mills. This makes it possible, not least for testing and development purposes, to carry out additional influencing of the particle size distribution in the common fine product product that is fundamentally made possible by the method according to the invention.
- the ground material to be ground from the at least two devices for grinding is not directed directly into the dynamic rod basket sifter, but first subjected to a pre-seal.
- the crushed regrind is in each case in a static Caution entered.
- Caregivers are used in the process of cement production to separate coarse material located in the material to be ground. These are coarse material residues that were not crushed during the grinding process.
- the coarse grain fractions discharged from the at least two rod basket sifters are again supplied to the devices for grinding.
- Such a recirculation of Gr manstrags offers the known economic advantages of Kreislaufmahlanlagen.
- the individual grinding cycles are run separately from each other, i. the coarse grain fraction from a rod basket sifter is returned to the corresponding apparatus for grinding, from which forth this Stabkorbsichter also flows the reformgut.
- the at least two rod cage separators are separately but in only one housing. This allows an economical material cost for the housing construction of the rod basket sifter and takes up the least space for the devices for sifting.
- two rod cage sifters are preferably coaxially stacked for dynamic reasons.
- FIG. 1 the method according to the invention for the production of cement is shown schematically for the exemplary embodiment in which two roller presses 1, 2 are used as devices for comminuting the at least one ground material.
- the Austragsgut from the roller presses 1, 2 is pneumatically introduced in each case with a crusher poverty 3a, 3b in the housing 6a, 6b each of a dynamic Stabkorbsichters 4, 5.
- Each of the two rod sifter 4, 5 has its own, speed-adjustable drive 24a, 24b, which puts him about its longitudinal axis in a rotational movement.
- Speed and direction of rotation of the two rod basket sifter 4, 5 can be controlled independently.
- the millbase suspended in the classifying air flows laterally toward the respective rod basket classifier 4, 5 and is accelerated by the rotational movement of the rod basket classifier 4, 5 into its zone of vision.
- the centrifugal forces acting on the particles of the prepareguts lead in cooperation with the frictional force of the air flow to a separation of the prepareguts in each case a coarse grain fraction 7, 8 (Grape) and each a fine material fraction 9, 10.
- the coarse grain fractions 7, 8 are from the Stabkorbsichtern 4, 5 discharged due to gravity down from the respective reformzone (Gr manstrag).
- the classified fines 9, 10 are pneumatically transported by the respective classifying air stream from the respective rod basket sifter 4, 5 and both arrive in the discharge device 11.
- a substantial phase of the method according to the invention for the production of a cement occurs in the discharge device 11 to a club so far separate classifying air streams.
- the merger of the classifying air flows leads to a turbulent flow dynamics in the interior of the discharge device 11. This results in a turbulence and in its consequence a uniform mixing of suspended in the classifying air streams fine material fractions 9, 10 to a homogeneous finished product with a correspondingly composed particle size distribution.
- the separation device here a cyclone
- the fine material 14 separated from the classifying air stream 15 can be stored in silos in the further process of cement production (not in the picture).
- FIGS. 4a and 4b are exemplary embodiments of the inventive method for producing a cement with a roller press 1 and a ball mill 16 ( FIG. 4a ) or with a vertical mill 17 and an impact hammer mill 18 (FIG. FIG. 4b ).
- procedures and structure are as in FIG. 1 ,
- FIG. 2 is based on the embodiment of FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an inventive method for producing a cement, in which the Austragsgut from the roller presses 1, 2 each undergoes a Vorsichtung before it is passed into one of the rod basket classifier 4, 5.
- the Austragsgutstrom 20a, 20b from each roller press 1, 2 is to each a static caution 21, 22, respectively.
- the discharged into a static cauterizer 21, 22 Austragsgut is separated into this in a fraction of fines 27a, 27b of the static Beicassers 21, 22 and a coarse material fraction, which leaves on the way Grobgutab Entry 26a, 26b, the static cautery 21, 22.
- the separated fines 27a, 27b of the static cauterizer 21, 22 is pneumatically with a classifying air stream 19a, 19b in each one of the rod basket classifier 4, 5 passed.
- FIG. 3 is based on the embodiment of FIG. 2 an extended to a grinding cycle, inventive method for producing a cement shown.
- the Gr maneaustrag from the Stabkorbsichtern 4, 5 each returned to the devices for grinding 1, 2.
- the recirculation takes place separately and to the respectively corresponding roller press 1, 2:
- the feed 25b of the coarse grain fraction takes place back to the roller press 2.
- the roller presses 1, 2 grind the recirculated coarse grain fractions 7, 8 together with that in the fresh material feeds 23a, 23b each supplied grinding stock.
- the Austragsgutströme 20a, 20b from the roller presses 1, 2 are each passed into the corresponding static caution 21, 22.
- the coarse material discharge discharged into the coarse material removal lines 26a, 26b of the static cauterizers 21, 22 can - not shown in the figure - be brought together with fresh material directly or after further pre-grinding and likewise fed back into the grinding cycle by way of the fresh material feeds 23a, 23b.
- FIG. 5 shows a detail of an embodiment of the method according to the invention, in which the two rod basket viewers 4, 5 are arranged in only one housing 6c. For dynamic reasons, a coaxial arrangement of the rod basket sifter 4, 5 is favorable, as shown.
- the rod basket separators 4, 5 are separated from each other by the respective prepare for the production of the rod basket sifter 4, 5 .
- the fines 9, 10 are separated from each other in the discharge 11, in which combines the classifying air streams and the two fines 9, 10 are uniformly mixed.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Crushing And Grinding (AREA)
- Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
- Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements, wobei mindestens ein Mahlgut in mindestens zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen zu verschiedenem gemahlenen Mahlgut mit voneinander verschiedenen Korngrößenverteilungen vermahlen wird, das gemahlene Mahlgut aus jeder der mindestens zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen getrennt voneinander mit je einem eigenen Sichtluftstrom je einem von mindestens zwei Stabkorbsichtern zugeführt wird, in jedem der mindestens zwei Stabkorbsichter eine Feingutfraktion ausgesichtet und eine Grobkornfraktion abgeführt wird.The invention relates to a method for producing a cement, wherein at least one millbase is ground in at least two devices for grinding to different ground millbase with mutually different grain size distributions, the ground millbase separated from each of the at least two devices for grinding separately, each with its own classifying air stream is supplied to one of at least two rod sifters, in each of the at least two rod sifter classified a fine material fraction and a coarse grain fraction is discharged.
Zur Herstellung von Zement und/oder Zementrohmehl wird ein für die Zementherstellung geeignetes Mahlgut wie Zementklinker, Hütten- bzw. Schlackensand, Kalkstein und/oder Gips in eine Vorrichtung zum Mahlen von Mahlgut aufgegeben. Insbesondere werden zur Zerkleinerung des Mahlguts Rollenpressen eingesetzt, die auch 'Gutbettwalzenmühle', 'Hochdruck-Walzenpresse' oder englisch ,High Pressure Grinding Roller Press' (HPGR) genannt werden. Das Austragsgut aus den Rollenpressen besteht aus noch vorhandenem Grobgut und einem bei der Zerkleinerung entstandenen Feingut. Zur Gewinnung des Feinguts wird es in Sichtern vom Grobgut abgeschieden. Für die Trennung von körnigen Feststoffen in Fraktionen mit verschiedenen Korngrößen ist bei der Zementherstellung der Einsatz von dynamischen Stabkorbsichtern bekannt, in denen Zementrohmehl und/oder Zement als Feingut abgeschieden wird. Zur Erzielung einer hohen Mahlfeinheit ist es bekannt, das Mahlgut im Verfahren einer Kreislaufmahlanlage solange im Umlauf zu führen, bis es aufgrund hinreichender Zerkleinerung aus dem Kreislauf durch Sichten entfernt wird.For the production of cement and / or cement raw meal suitable for cement production regrind such as cement clinker, metallurgical or slag sand, limestone and / or gypsum is placed in a device for grinding regrind. In particular, for the crushing of the material to be ground roller presses are used, which are also called 'high-grade roller mill', 'high-pressure roller press' (HPGR). The material to be removed from the roller presses consists of still existing coarse material and a fine material produced during comminution. For the production of the fine material, it is separated from the coarse material in classifiers. For the separation of granular solids into fractions of different grain sizes, the use of dynamic rod basket separators is known in cement production in which cement raw meal and / or cement is precipitated as fines. In order to achieve a high grinding fineness, it is known to circulate the millbase in the process of a Kreislaufmahlanlage until it is removed due to sufficient comminution from the circulation by sifting.
Für die Festigkeit des Baustoffes Zement ist dessen Korngrößenverteilung ein wesentlicher Parameter. Insbesondere kann sich eine sehr steile Korngrößenverteilungskurve negativ auf die Festigkeit von Zement auswirken. So ist es aus der Praxis bekannt, dass die Vermahlung von Zementklinker mit Rollenpressen zu steilen Korngrößenverteilungen führt, da hierbei nur ein geringer Feingutanteil mit einer im Vergleich zur mittleren Partikelgröße signifikant kleineren Partikelgröße entsteht. Von Vorteil sind daher Verfahren, die eine Verbreiterung der Korngrößenverteilung bewirken bzw. grundsätzlich eine Beeinflussung der Korngrößenverteilung zulassen, um eine hohe Qualität von Zement zu erreichen. Beispielsweise kommt es zu einer sehr hohen Zementfestigkeit, wenn eine Feingutfraktion von möglichst kleinen Körnern und eine Feingutfraktion aus größeren Körnern zusammen eine sehr kompakte Partikelanordnung bilden.For the strength of the building material cement whose particle size distribution is an essential parameter. In particular, a very steep grain size distribution curve can negatively impact the strength of cement. Thus, it is known from practice that the milling of cement clinker with roller presses leads to steep particle size distributions, since in this case only a small proportion of fines is formed with a particle size that is significantly smaller than the average particle size. Therefore, processes which cause a widening of the particle size distribution or, in principle, allow the particle size distribution to be influenced in order to achieve a high quality of cement are advantageous. For example, a very high cement strength occurs when a fines fraction of grains as small as possible and a fines fraction of larger grains together form a very compact particle arrangement.
Ausgehend vom Stand der Technik kann eine verbreiterte Korngrößenverteilung durch das Betreiben von mindestens zwei gleichartigen Kreislaufmahlanlagen erreicht werden. Durch Unterschiede bei den dabei eingesetzten Rollenpressen (insbesondere bei den Anpresskräften) und den Stabkorbsichtern (insbesondere bzgl. Drehzahl und Abmessungen) lassen sich unterschiedliche, steile Korngrößenverteilungen erzeugen. Aus
Aufgabe der Erfindung ist es daher, ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements zur Verfügung zu stellen, welches die Nachteile aus dem Stand der Technik überwindet.The object of the invention is therefore to provide a method for producing a cement, which overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
Die erfindungsgemäße Aufgabe wird durch das Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements mit den Merkmalen des Anspruchs 1 gelöst. Weitere vorteilhafte Ausgestaltungen sind in den Unteransprüchen zu Anspruch 1 angegeben.The object of the invention is achieved by the method for producing a cement having the features of
Nach der Erfindung ist vorgesehen, dass in mindestens zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen mindestens ein für die Zementherstellung geeignetes Mahlgut vermahlen wird und dass das in voneinander getrennten Sichtluftströmen suspendierte gemahlene Mahlgut jeweils einem dynamischen Stabkorbsichter pneumatisch zugeführt wird. In jedem Stabkorbsichter wird eine Trennung einer Grobkornfraktion (Grieße) und einer Feinkornfraktion erreicht. Die Grieße werden abgeführt. Die in den Stabkorbsichtern ausgesichteten Feingutfraktionen werden von den jeweiligen Sichtluftströmen in eine gemeinsame Austragsvorrichtung ausgetragen. In der Austragsvorrichtung strömen die Sichtluftströme zusammen. Das hierbei entstehende Strömungsfeld im Inneren der Austragsvorrichtung verwirbelt die Feingutpartikel und führt zu einer gleichmäßigen Durchmischung der Feingutfraktionen aus den einzelnen Stabkorbsichtern. Durch das Verfahren, die Feingutfraktionen aus den einzelnen Stabkorbsichtern schon durch Vereinen der Sichtluftströme zu durchmischen und nicht erst nach Abscheidung aus den jeweiligen Sichtluftströmen zu verschneiden, wird kein weiterer Schritt eines Verschnitts im Verfahren benötigt. Dies bietet bauökonomische und nicht zuletzt hinsichtlich der Energiekosten auch wirtschaftliche Vorteile, da auf eine zusätzliche Vorrichtung für einen solchen Verschnitt im Gesamtprozess der Zementherstellung verzichtet werden kann.According to the invention, it is provided that in at least two grinders at least one grindable material suitable for cement production is ground and that the ground grindbase suspended in separate classifying air streams is in each case supplied pneumatically to a dynamic rod basket sifter. In each rod basket sifter a separation of a coarse grain fraction (grits) and a fine grain fraction is achieved. The grits are taken away. The fine material fractions which are located in the rod basket sifters are discharged from the respective classifying air streams into a common discharge device. In the discharge device, the classifying air streams flow together. The resulting flow field inside the discharge device swirls the fine material particles and leads to a uniform mixing of the fine material fractions from the individual rod basket separators. By the method of mixing the fine material fractions from the individual rod sifter already by unifying the classifying air streams and not to be blended only after separation from the respective classifying air streams, no further step of a blending in the process is needed. This offers economic advantages, and not least in terms of energy costs also economic benefits, as can be dispensed with an additional device for such a blend in the overall process of cement production.
Nach der Erfindung kann es vorgesehen sein, dass den mindestens zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen voneinander verschiedenes Mahlgut, beispielsweise Zementklinker, Hütten- bzw. Schlackensand, Kalkstein und/oder Gips, zugeführt wird. Werden den Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen zugleich unterschiedliche Ausgangsprodukte als jeweiliges Mahlgut zugeführt, kann damit Einfluss auf die Zusammensetzung des Zements bzw. Zementrohmehls genommen werden.According to the invention it can be provided that the at least two devices for grinding mutually different millbase, for example cement clinker, metallurgical or slag sand, limestone and / or gypsum, is supplied. If at the same time different starting materials are supplied to the devices for grinding as the respective ground material, this can influence the composition of the cement or cement raw meal.
Nach konkreter Ausgestaltung der Erfindung ist vorgesehen, als Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen vorzugsweise Rollenpressen einzusetzen. Betriebseigenschaften von Rollenpressen und die Beschaffenheit des von ihnen zerkleinerten Frischguts sind in der Zementherstellung gut bekannt. Insbesondere führen Rollenpressen zu steilen Korngrößenverteilungskurven. Durch unterschiedliche Einstellung der Zerkleinerungseigenschaften der verwendeten zwei oder mehr Rollenpressen mit jeweils nachfolgendem Stabkorbsichter kann für das gemeinsame Feingutprodukt leicht die gewünschte verbreiterte Korngrößenverteilung erreicht werden. Insbesondere ist damit im Falle von zwei Rollenpressen und zwei Stabkorbsichtern eine Zusammensetzung aus einem gröberen und einem feineren Feingutanteil im gemeinsamen Feingutprodukt erzeugbar, was zu einer hohen Festigkeit von Zement führt.According to a concrete embodiment of the invention, it is provided to use preferably roller presses as devices for grinding. Operating characteristics of roller presses and the nature of the comminuted fresh produce are well known in cement production. In particular, roller presses lead to steep particle size distribution curves. By varying the setting of the crushing properties of the two or more roller presses used, each with a following rod basket sifter, the desired broadened particle size distribution can easily be achieved for the common fine product product. In particular, in the case of two roller presses and two Stabkorbsichtern a composition of a coarser and a finer fines content in the common fines product is produced, resulting in a high strength of cement.
Das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren ist nicht auf den Einsatz von Rollenpressen begrenzt. Es ist möglich, an ihrer Stelle auch andere, aus der Zementherstellung bekannte Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen von Mahlgut, insbesondere Kugelmühlen (Rohrmühlen), Vertikalmühlen und Prallhammermühlen einzusetzen. Dies ermöglicht es nicht zuletzt zu Test- und Entwicklungszwecken, zusätzliche, durch das erfindungsgemäße Verfahren prinzipiell ermöglichte Beeinflussungen der Korngrößenverteilung im gemeinsamen Feingutprodukt vorzunehmen.The inventive method is not limited to the use of roller presses. It is possible, in their place, to use other devices known from cement production for grinding regrind, in particular ball mills (tube mills), vertical mills and impact hammer mills. This makes it possible, not least for testing and development purposes, to carry out additional influencing of the particle size distribution in the common fine product product that is fundamentally made possible by the method according to the invention.
Gemäß einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist es vorgesehen, das gemahlene Mahlgut aus den mindestens zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen nicht direkt in die dynamischen Stabkorbsichter zu leiten, sondern zunächst einer Vorsichtung zu unterziehen. Dazu wird das zerkleinerte Mahlgut jeweils in einen statischen Vorsichter eingegeben. Vorsichter werden im Verfahren der Zementherstellung eingesetzt, um im Mahlgut befindliches Grobgut abzutrennen. Dabei handelt es sich um Grobgutreste, die im Mahlvorgang nicht zerkleinert wurden. Darüber hinaus gibt es einen Anteil an Agglomeraten im Austragsgut der Rollenpressen, die durch den hohen Anpressdruck bei der Gutbettzerkleinerung in den Rollenpressen aus den Partikeln des Zementklinkers gebildet wurden. Es ist bekannt, statische Vorsichter (z.B. Kaskadensichter) zur Desagglomeration dieser sogenannten Schülpen bei der Zementproduktion einzusetzen. Das in den statischen Vorsichtern abgetrennte Grobgut wird abgeführt. Das ausgesichtete Feingut jedes statischen Vorsichters wird mit einem eigenen Sichtluftstrom pneumatisch zur weiteren Aussichtung je einem dynamischen Stabkorbsichter zugeführt.According to one embodiment of the invention, it is provided that the ground material to be ground from the at least two devices for grinding is not directed directly into the dynamic rod basket sifter, but first subjected to a pre-seal. For this purpose, the crushed regrind is in each case in a static Caution entered. Caregivers are used in the process of cement production to separate coarse material located in the material to be ground. These are coarse material residues that were not crushed during the grinding process. In addition, there is a proportion of agglomerates in the Austragsgut the roller presses, which were formed by the high contact pressure in the Gutbettzerkleinerung in the roller presses from the particles of cement clinker. It is known to use static cautionary (eg Cascade classifier) for deagglomeration of these so-called scabs in cement production. The coarse material separated in the static cauterizers is removed. The screened fines of each static cauterizer are pneumatically fed with their own classifying air stream for further viewing of each dynamic bar cage sifter.
Gemäß einer weiteren Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist vorgesehen, die aus den mindestens zwei Stabkorbsichtern abgeführten Grobkornfraktionen (Grießeaustrag) erneut den Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen zuzuführen. Eine solche Rezirkulation des Grießeaustrags bietet die bekannten wirtschaftlichen Vorteile von Kreislaufmahlanlagen. Für eine bessere Kontrollierung der Korngrößenverteilungen ist vorgesehen, dass die einzelnen Mahlkreisläufe getrennt voneinander durchlaufen werden, d.h. die Grobkornfraktion aus einem Stabkorbsichter wird zur korrespondierenden Vorrichtung zum Mahlen zurückgeführt, von der her diesem Stabkorbsichter auch das Sichtgut zuströmt.According to a further embodiment of the invention, the coarse grain fractions discharged from the at least two rod basket sifters are again supplied to the devices for grinding. Such a recirculation of Grießeaustrags offers the known economic advantages of Kreislaufmahlanlagen. For a better control of the grain size distributions, it is provided that the individual grinding cycles are run separately from each other, i. the coarse grain fraction from a rod basket sifter is returned to the corresponding apparatus for grinding, from which forth this Stabkorbsichter also flows the Sichtgut.
Gemäß zumindest einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung ist es ferner vorgesehen, die mindestens zwei Stabkorbsichter zwar getrennt voneinander, aber in nur einem Gehäuse anzuordnen. Dies ermöglicht einen wirtschaftlich günstigen Materialaufwand für die Gehäusekonstruktion der Stabkorbsichter und nimmt den geringsten Raum für die Vorrichtungen zum Sichten ein. Im typischen Fall von zwei Stabkorbsichtern werden diese aus dynamischen Gründen vorzugsweise koaxial übereinander angeordnet.In accordance with at least one embodiment of the invention, it is further provided to arrange the at least two rod cage separators separately but in only one housing. This allows an economical material cost for the housing construction of the rod basket sifter and takes up the least space for the devices for sifting. Typically, two rod cage sifters are preferably coaxially stacked for dynamic reasons.
Die Erfindung wird anhand der folgenden Figuren näher erläutert. Es zeigt:
- Figur 1:
- ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements im Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei als Rollenpressen ausgeführten Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen und zwei im Vertikalschnitt dargestellten Stabkorbsichtern in getrennten Gehäusen;
- Figur 2:
- ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements im Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei als Rollenpressen ausgeführten Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen, zwei im Vertikalschnitt dargestellten Stabkorbsichtern in getrennten Gehäusen und mit Vorsichtung in zwei statischen Vorsichtern;
- Figur 3:
- ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements in einer Ausführungsform als Kreislaufmahlanlage, im Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei als Rollenpressen ausgeführten Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen, zwei im Vertikalschnitt dargestellten Stabkorbsichtern in getrennten Gehäusen und mit Vorsichtung in zwei statischen Vorsichtern;
- Figur 4a:
- ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements im Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen, von denen eine eine Rollenpresse und die zweite eine Kugelmühle ist, und zwei im Vertikalschnitt dargestellten Stabkorbsichtern in getrennten Gehäusen;
- Figur 4b:
- ein erfindungsgemäßes Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements im Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei Vorrichtungen zum Mahlen, von denen eine eine Vertikalmühle und die zweite eine Prallhammermühle ist, und zwei im Vertikalschnitt dargestellten Stabkorbsichtern in getrennten Gehäusen;
- Figur 5:
- Ausschnitt aus dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Zements, im Vertikalschnitt darstellend das Ausführungsbeispiel mit zwei Stabkorbsichtern in einem gemeinsamen Gehäuse.
- FIG. 1:
- an inventive method for producing a cement in the embodiment with two executed as roller presses devices for grinding and two shown in vertical section Stabkorbsichtern in separate cases;
- FIG. 2:
- an inventive method for producing a cement in the embodiment with two executed as roller presses devices for grinding, two shown in vertical section Stabkorbsichtern in separate housings and with caution in two static Cautioners;
- FIG. 3:
- an inventive method for producing a cement in one embodiment as Kreislaufmahlanlage, in the embodiment with two designed as roller presses devices for grinding, two shown in vertical section Stabkorbsichtern in separate housings and with caution in two static cautionary;
- FIG. 4a
- an inventive method for producing a cement in the embodiment with two devices for grinding, one of which is a roller press and the second is a ball mill, and two shown in vertical section Stabkorbsichtern in separate cases;
- FIG. 4b:
- an inventive method for producing a cement in the embodiment with two devices for grinding, one of which is a vertical mill and the second is an impact hammer mill, and two in vertical sections shown Stabkorbsichtern in separate housings;
- FIG. 5:
- Section of the inventive method for producing a cement, in vertical section representing the embodiment with two rod basket sifters in a common housing.
In
Die ausgesichteten Feingutfraktionen 9, 10 werden pneumatisch von dem jeweiligen Sichtluftstrom aus dem jeweiligen Stabkorbsichter 4, 5 transportiert und gelangen beide in die Austragsvorrichtung 11. In einer wesentlichen Phase des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens zur Herstellung eines Zements kommt es in der Austragsvorrichtung 11 zu einem Vereinen der bislang getrennten Sichtluftströme. Die Zusammenführung der Sichtluftströme führt zu einer turbulenten Strömungsdynamik im Innenraum der Austragsvorrichtung 11. Hieraus resultiert eine Verwirbelung und in ihrer Folge eine gleichmäßige Durchmischung der in den Sichtluftströmen suspendierten Feingutfraktionen 9, 10 zu einem homogenen Fertiggut mit entsprechend zusammengesetzter Korngrößenverteilung. Dieses verlässt als Feingutstrom 12 die Austragsvorrichtung 11 und gelangt zur Abscheideeinrichtung (hier ein Zyklon) 13. In der Abscheideeinrichtung 13 wird das Feingut 14 vom Sichtluftstrom 15 getrennt und kann so im weiteren Verfahren der Zementherstellung in Silos eingelagert werden (nicht im Bild).The
In den
In
In
Claims (6)
- Method for producing cement, wherein- at least one material to be ground is ground in at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18) into differently ground material with grain size distributions that are different from one another,- the ground material from each of the at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18) is fed separately from one another by its own respective classifying air stream (3a, 3b) to one of at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5),- in each of the at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5) a fine material fraction (9, 10)is separated out and a coarse grain fraction (7, 8) is discharged,characterized by
combining the classifying air streams, emerging from the at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5) and supporting the fine material fractions (9, 10), inside a common discharge device (11), wherein a uniform mixing of the fine material fractions (9, 10) takes place. - Method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18) are preferably roller presses(1, 2).
- Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 2,
characterized in that- the ground material is discharged from the at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18) and is supplied in discharged material flows (20a, 20b) separately from one another each to one of at least two static preliminary sifters (21, 22),- in the static preliminary sifters (21 22) a coarse material discharge (26a, 26b) and a separating out of the fine material (27a, 27b) of the static preliminary sifters (21, 22) takes place,- the fine material (27a, 27b) of the at least two static preliminary sifters (21, 22) is supplied separated from one another by its own classifying air stream (19a, 19b) into one each of the at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5). - Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 3,
characterized in that
the coarse grain fractions (7, 8) are discharged from the at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5) and are supplied separately from one another to the respective corresponding device of the at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18). - Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 4,
characterized in that
at least two of the at least two bar-cage classifiers (4, 5) are arranged in only one housing (6c). - Method as claimed in one of claims 1 to 5,
characterized in that
at least one of the at least two grinding devices (1, 2, 16, 17, 18) is a ball mill (16), a vertical mill (17) or an impact hammer mill (18).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102013019840.2A DE102013019840A1 (en) | 2013-11-26 | 2013-11-26 | Process for the production of cement |
PCT/EP2014/075308 WO2015078787A1 (en) | 2013-11-26 | 2014-11-21 | Method for producing cement |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3074137A1 EP3074137A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 |
EP3074137B1 true EP3074137B1 (en) | 2017-10-25 |
Family
ID=51999410
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14805222.8A Not-in-force EP3074137B1 (en) | 2013-11-26 | 2014-11-21 | Method for producing cement |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3074137B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102013019840A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK3074137T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015078787A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102014015654B4 (en) * | 2014-10-22 | 2016-08-11 | Khd Humboldt Wedag Gmbh | Plant for grinding and sifting cement clinker |
DE102015001404B3 (en) | 2015-02-04 | 2016-08-04 | Khd Humboldt Wedag Gmbh | Kreislaufmahlanlage with two grinders and method for operating the Kreislaufmahlanlage |
CN108043511A (en) * | 2018-01-16 | 2018-05-18 | 海安海太铸造有限公司 | A kind of raw materials for cement crushes dispensing mixing arrangement |
CN108554507A (en) * | 2018-01-16 | 2018-09-21 | 海安海太铸造有限公司 | Efficient centrifugal, mixing apparatus in a kind of manufacture of cement |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4334904A1 (en) * | 1993-10-13 | 1995-04-20 | Kloeckner Humboldt Deutz Ag | Circulating grinding plant |
DE10333361A1 (en) * | 2003-07-23 | 2005-02-10 | Gebr. Pfeiffer Ag | Process for preparation of cement e.g. Portland cement involves milling cement clinker with sulfate containing carrier material and other components in a roller mill |
DE202007016785U1 (en) | 2007-11-29 | 2009-04-02 | Khd Humboldt Wedag Gmbh | Kreislaufmahlanlage |
DE102008019830B4 (en) | 2008-04-11 | 2019-01-24 | Khd Humboldt Wedag Gmbh | Circulation meter with external risers |
-
2013
- 2013-11-26 DE DE102013019840.2A patent/DE102013019840A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2014
- 2014-11-21 EP EP14805222.8A patent/EP3074137B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2014-11-21 WO PCT/EP2014/075308 patent/WO2015078787A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-11-21 DK DK14805222.8T patent/DK3074137T3/en active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3074137A1 (en) | 2016-10-05 |
DK3074137T3 (en) | 2018-01-29 |
DE102013019840A1 (en) | 2015-05-28 |
WO2015078787A1 (en) | 2015-06-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0603481B1 (en) | Method and arrangement for milling grinding stock | |
EP0650763B1 (en) | Closed circuit grinding plant | |
EP2271428A1 (en) | Circulating mill system with external rising pipes | |
DE102007046834B4 (en) | Process for the production of cements containing granulated blastfurnace | |
WO2015086554A1 (en) | Closed-circuit grinding plant having a pre-classifier and a ball mill | |
EP3074137B1 (en) | Method for producing cement | |
EP0406591B1 (en) | Method and arrangement for milling material to be milled | |
WO2010072276A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for comminuting mineral ground product | |
DE102014010065B3 (en) | Kreislaufmahlanlage with second grinding circuit and method for operating the Kreislaufmahlanlage | |
DE102015001404B3 (en) | Kreislaufmahlanlage with two grinders and method for operating the Kreislaufmahlanlage | |
DE19514971A1 (en) | Energy efficient grinding, esp. of cement clinker | |
EP3665133B1 (en) | Method and plant for producing cement | |
DE19526040A1 (en) | Installation in which grains of material are reduced in size | |
EP0366759B1 (en) | Process for size reduction of brittle grinding material | |
EP2407244B1 (en) | Method for comminution of material by a tube mill | |
DE3710602A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for processing granular material, in particular wheat | |
EP0648539B1 (en) | Closed circuit grinding plant | |
DE4307230A1 (en) | Process and plant for comminuting the bed of brittle regrind | |
EP3368222B1 (en) | Pneumatically connected cascade classifier and circulating grinding plant with pneumatically connected cascade classifiers | |
EP3655164B1 (en) | Two-stage milling circuit and method for producing a milled product by means of a two-stage milling | |
EP1640070B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for grinding material | |
DE10147591A1 (en) | Process for crushing regrind and grinding plant | |
DE102014015654B4 (en) | Plant for grinding and sifting cement clinker | |
DE102014015161A1 (en) | Plant for grinding and sifting cement clinker | |
DE102014006429B4 (en) | Plant and method for grinding and sifting cement clinker with impermeability |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20160519 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170707 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 939430 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502014005994 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 Effective date: 20180122 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20171212 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20171213 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20171212 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20171025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180125 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180125 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180126 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180225 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502014005994 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171121 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20141121 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20181121 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171025 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 939430 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20191121 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191121 |