EP2924662B1 - Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system - Google Patents
Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2924662B1 EP2924662B1 EP14161986.6A EP14161986A EP2924662B1 EP 2924662 B1 EP2924662 B1 EP 2924662B1 EP 14161986 A EP14161986 A EP 14161986A EP 2924662 B1 EP2924662 B1 EP 2924662B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- onboard unit
- error
- unit according
- dataset
- satellite
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000013442 quality metrics Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036962 time dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B15/00—Arrangements or apparatus for collecting fares, tolls or entrance fees at one or more control points
- G07B15/06—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems
- G07B15/063—Arrangements for road pricing or congestion charging of vehicles or vehicle users, e.g. automatic toll systems using wireless information transmission between the vehicle and a fixed station
Definitions
- the present invention relates to an on-board unit for a road toll system, comprising a satellite navigation receiver for the continuous generation of position fixes and associated quality measurements from raw satellite data, a radio transceiver and a processor connected to these components, which is adapted to generate toll data from the position fixes and via the Radio transceiver to send.
- the invention further relates to a method for monitoring the function in a road toll system using such an on-board unit.
- Onboard units based on satellite navigation systems (GNSS) may e.g. Be "Thick Client” OBUs, which match the position fixes generated with a stored in the onboard unit digital road map, thereby determine toll routes, calculate related tolls and send as toll data on the radio transceiver, but also "thin client” OBUs, which directly send the position fixes as toll data to a central office, which calculates the tolls.
- GNSS OBUs satellite navigation systems
- the predetermined toll routes random samples Departure to then compare the tolls incurred in the headquarters of the Toll Chargers with the random checks.
- the Toll Charger will request individual toll onboard units to randomly collect positional data and send as reference data directly to the Toll Charger toll center where it compares the reference data with the tolls generated by the service provider during operation to improve performance of the road toll system.
- the invention has for its object to provide devices and methods for functional testing in a road toll system, which allow as a result an improvement in the performance of the road toll system and thus an increase in Vermustungsgrades.
- an onboard unit of the aforementioned type which is characterized by a failure detector connected to the satellite navigation receiver adapted to respond to a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop in quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure; and a logger connected to the satellite navigation receiver and controlled by the failure detector, which is adapted to generate an error record with at least the last position fix before the response when the failure detector responds; wherein the processor is adapted to receive the error record from the logger and send it via the radio transceiver.
- this makes it possible for the first time to make the quality of the GNSS position determination and coverage in the road toll system accessible to a central evaluation and thereby to determine critical GNSS fault locations in the road network at an early stage and to allocate them geographically on the basis of the last position fix.
- position detection errors of GNSS OBUs can be evaluated continuously or, if the OBUs are spread, continuously and at short intervals in the control center.
- different GNSS-related errors in the road toll system e.g. Spurious signals, shadowing of the satellite signals, etc., and their causes, e.g. local or even mobile interference sources (“jammers”) or geographical conditions such as mountains or tunnels closed.
- measures for fault elimination for example, at the error locations respectively bounded by the last position fixes.
- the setting up of stationary position transmitters, support beacons, satellite signal repeaters or the like, or the identification and switching off of interference signal sources, etc. are initiated.
- the error data record generated by the onboard unit has a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes.
- a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes can be inferred.
- the movement of a mobile jamming signal source can be accurately tracked to identify, for example, "jamming" that deliberately sends jamming signals to hinder proper building, using traffic cameras and / or emergency vehicles.
- the error data set also contains the first position fix generated after the completion of the response or detection.
- the error data record preferably also contains a time stamp of the named first position fix.
- the error data set also contains at least one quality measurement value generated during the response of the failure detector or detection of the failure.
- the quality measurement contains, for example, the number of satellites used to generate the associated position fix or a DOP value (Dilution of Precision) of the associated position measurement value, an unfavorable satellite constellation could be detected - accidentally or locally frequently.
- the quality measured value contains the respective signal level of the satellite used to generate the associated position measured value and / or a signal / noise ratio of the satellite signals, then interference signals or signal attenuation can also be caused, for example as a result of local, possibly even mobile jammers or from weather events or shadowing by mountains or forest.
- an error record may include not only one but also a series of quality measurements generated during the response of the failure detector, resulting in an evaluation of the history of the quality measurements and thus more accurate conclusions, e.g. allowed over possibly different error causes.
- the error data record preferably also contains satellite raw data received during the response of the failure detector or detecting the failure and / or sensor measured values generated in a sensor element, thereby providing further bases for a later determination of possible causes of the error.
- the failure detector contains a watchdog which is newly abuttable by each position fix generated. This represents a particularly simple, reliable component for the failure detector.
- At least one second error data record generated and sent by a second on-board unit in the manner mentioned is received in the center, and the error data records of the at least two on-board units are validated against one another during the evaluation.
- temporal changes of possible causes of faults can be considered more easily and individual faults or faults of individual onboard units, e.g. due to an improper arrangement in the vehicle, be compensated.
- the number of available onboard units in the evaluation of the error data sets increases their informative value with regard to possible causes of error.
- Fig. 1 shows a road toll system 1 based on onboard units (OBUs) 2, which are carried by vehicles 3 in order to toll their usage in a network of roads 4.
- OBUs onboard units
- the location use, for example, the driving of a particular segment of a road 4, crossing a border, the residence in a particular geographical area or the like. be and in any way, for example, per road segment, distance traveled, in a region of time spent (eg parking time), etc. billed.
- each on-board unit 2 has a satellite navigation receiver 5, which consists of satellite signals 6 from navigation satellites 7 (FIG. Fig. 1 ) of a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) continuously determines the position of the on-board unit 2 and as position fixes p 1 , p 2 ,..., generally p i , with associated quality measurement values q 1 , q 2 , ... , generally q i , outputs.
- GNSS global navigation satellite system
- Each quality measurement q i of a position fix p i can contain various quality parameters, for example the number, signal level and / or signal / noise ratio of the signals 6 of the navigation satellites 7 used for determining the respective position fix p i , eg also in evaluated form The form of dilution of precision (DOP) values provided by commercially available satellite navigation receivers 5 for each position fix p i .
- DOP dilution of precision
- the satellite navigation receiver 5 can also output the underlying "raw" satellite data, eg sections of the satellite signals 6, or processing data formed during the generation of the position fixes p i , hereinafter "raw satellite data" r i called.
- the output of the position fixes p i , quality measurements q i or raw satellite data r i can take place on mutually separate outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5, on a common output in multiplexing or on a common bus in separate data packets.
- the on-board unit 2 is further provided with a radio transceiver 8, e.g. according to a 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G mobile radio standard such as GSM, UMTS or LTE, the ITS-G5 or WAVE standard for short-range radio communication, one of the IEEE 802.11 standards for WLAN communication or the like, and a processor 9 connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 and the radio transceiver 8.
- a radio transceiver 8 e.g. according to a 2G, 3G, 4G or 5G mobile radio standard such as GSM, UMTS or LTE, the ITS-G5 or WAVE standard for short-range radio communication, one of the IEEE 802.11 standards for WLAN communication or the like
- a processor 9 connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 and the radio transceiver 8.
- Optional may also be one or more sensor elements 10, for example, velocity or acceleration sensors, are provided, which in the onboard unit 2 itself, or - connected to the on-board unit 2 - may be arranged in the vehicle 3, and sensor measurements m i, for example, speed , Acceleration or approximate local measured values generate.
- sensor element 10 can also be formed by the radio transceiver 8, in which case the sensor measured values m i are metadata of the radio transceiver 8, eg radio cell or received field strength data of a radio connection 11 to a radio station 12, here a base station of a mobile radio network in which the radio transceiver 8 is located.
- the processor 9 generates toll data M from the sequence ⁇ p i ⁇ of position fixes p i in order to use the radio transceiver 8 via the radio link 11 and the radio station 12 to a central office 13 of the road toll system 1 to send.
- the toll data M may be, for example, tolls, which are generated by a map matching of the position fix sequence ⁇ p i ⁇ with a digital toll road 4 or places stored in the on-board unit 2.
- the toll data M could also be the position fixes p i itself, which are individually or - if desired filtered according to quality - combined into a bundle at arbitrary or predetermined times, after predetermined distances or simply with the availability of a radio link 11 via the radio transceiver 8 sent. In the latter case, card matching and billing can be done for example in the center 13.
- Fig. 1 the vehicles 3 pass through a geographical area 14 on their respective routes on the roads 4 in which the satellite signals 6 received by the satellite navigation receivers 5 are disturbed, so that the quality measurements qi fall off and / or the respective satellite navigation receivers 5 do not generate position fixes p i ,
- Fig. 3 shows in this example of waveforms of the respective signals or data of an on-board unit 2.
- the satellite navigation receiver 5 generates the satellite navigation receiver 5 at times t 1, t 2, ..., generally i t, from the raw satellite data r i (not shown) each having a Position fix p i ( Fig. 3a ) and an associated quality measurement q i ( Fig. 3c ). If the vehicle 3 passes through said geographical area 14, the satellite navigation receiver 5 does not generate any position fixes p i over a period of time e, but in general continues to produce quality measured values q i .
- the on-board unit 2 has a connected to the satellite navigation receiver 5 failure detector 15 which responds and an output signal s ( Fig. 3e ) generates, for example, a logical "high” signal or a logical "1" if it either (a) the absence of position fixes p i over a predetermined minimum period of time ⁇ and / or (b) a drop of quality measured values q i below predetermined minimum quality measure Q min detected.
- the failure detector 15 may have a watchdog 16, eg in the form of a deadman or retriggerable monoflop circuit, which is triggered by each new position fix p i at its input again for the minimum period of time ⁇ and thus at its (here: inverted) output a detection signal d ( Fig. 3b ) outputs, if within the specified minimum period ⁇ no new position fix p i attains.
- a watchdog 16 eg in the form of a deadman or retriggerable monoflop circuit, which is triggered by each new position fix p i at its input again for the minimum period of time ⁇ and thus at its (here: inverted) output a detection signal d ( Fig. 3b ) outputs, if within the specified minimum period ⁇ no new position fix p i attains.
- the failure detector 15 for detecting the event (b) may have a comparator 17 which compares the incoming quality measurements q i with a minimum quality measure Q min , and an output c when the quality measures q i fall below the minimum quality measure Q min ( Fig. 3d ).
- the comparator 17 may first combine a quality metric q i containing several parameters (dimensions) into a single global quality metric Q i ; alternatively, the minimum quality measure Q min could include separate single thresholds for a plurality of quality parameters included in a quality metric q i .
- the output signals c of the watchdog 16 and d of the comparator 17 can be linked, for example, by a simple OR circuit 18 to the output signal s of the failure detector 15.
- the OR circuit 18 may also be a complex Ausretelogik, which, for example, the timing of the signals c and d also taken into account, are provided. If the failure detector 15 contains only one of the components watchdog 16 or comparator 17, the circuit 18 is omitted and the output signal s coincides with the signal c or d.
- the output signal s generated by the failure detector 15 activates a logger 19 which, in the case of said events (a) and / or (b), generates an error record F and makes it available to the processor 9 for transmission via the radio transceiver 8 to the center 13.
- the logger 19 is, for example, a recording unit 20 with a buffer memory 21 connected to one or more outputs of the satellite navigation receiver 5.
- the logger 19 may pre-process the error record F, for example, by exiting redundant or irrelevant data, supplementing with environment data from the environment of the on-board unit 2 or internal status data of the on-board unit 2, data summary, etc. depending on the situation.
- the received error records F are evaluated. This evaluation can on the one hand be done individually, i. the error data sets F of an on-board unit 2 are considered on their own; on the other hand, a plurality of error data sets F of different on-board units 2 can also be received, jointly evaluated and, for example, evaluated. be validated against each other.
- the error data sets F are determined as a function of the position fixes p m , p n , ⁇ p i ⁇ and, if detected, their time stamps t m , t n , ⁇ t i ⁇ , quality measurements q m , q n , ⁇ q i ⁇ , raw satellite data ⁇ r i ⁇ and / or sensor readings ⁇ m i ⁇ are considered and analyzed for possible sources of error in order to prepare measures for their elimination.
- geographic interference and shading regions 14 of the satellite reception as well as their time dependency may be determined.
- the onboard unit 2 as a whole or individual ones of its components, such as the failure detector 15, the logger 19 or parts thereof both as hardware components and as software objects, e.g. in the processor 9.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
- Devices For Checking Fares Or Tickets At Control Points (AREA)
- Navigation (AREA)
Description
Die vorliegende Erfindung betrifft eine Onboard-Unit für ein Straßenmautsystem, mit einem Satellitennavigationsempfänger zur fortlaufenden Erzeugung von Positionsfixen und zugehörigen Qualitätsmesswerten aus Satellitenrohdaten, einem Funksendeempfänger und einem an diese Komponenten angeschlossenen Prozessor, der dafür ausgebildet ist, aus den Positionsfixen Mautdaten zu erzeugen und über den Funksendeempfänger zu senden. Die Erfindung betrifft ferner ein Verfahren zur Funktionsüberwachung in einem Straßenmautsystem mithilfe einer solchen Onboard-Unit.The present invention relates to an on-board unit for a road toll system, comprising a satellite navigation receiver for the continuous generation of position fixes and associated quality measurements from raw satellite data, a radio transceiver and a processor connected to these components, which is adapted to generate toll data from the position fixes and via the Radio transceiver to send. The invention further relates to a method for monitoring the function in a road toll system using such an on-board unit.
Onboard-Units (OBUs) auf Basis von Satellitennavigationssystemen (global navigation satellite systems, GNSS) können z.B. "Thick Client"-OBUs sein, welche die erzeugten Positionsfixe mit einer in der Onboard-Unit hinterlegten digitalen Straßenkarte abgleichen, dabei gebührenpflichtige Fahrstrecken ermitteln, zugehörige Mautgebühren errechnen und als Mautdaten über den Funksendeempfänger senden, aber auch "Thin Client"-OBUs, welche direkt die Positionsfixe als Mautdaten an eine Zentrale senden, die daraus die Mautgebühren berechnet. Die Funktions- und Leistungsfähigkeit solcher GNSS-OBUs hängt maßgeblich von der Qualität ihres Satellitenempfangs und der daraus bestimmten Positionsfixe ab.Onboard units (OBUs) based on satellite navigation systems (GNSS) may e.g. Be "Thick Client" OBUs, which match the position fixes generated with a stored in the onboard unit digital road map, thereby determine toll routes, calculate related tolls and send as toll data on the radio transceiver, but also "thin client" OBUs, which directly send the position fixes as toll data to a central office, which calculates the tolls. The functionality and performance of such GNSS OBUs depends largely on the quality of their satellite reception and the resulting position fixes.
In der
Während die Abrechnung der Mautgebühren meist in der Hand des Straßenerhalters oder einer Behörde, des sog. "Toll Charger", liegt, wird die Erzeugung von Mautdaten oder das Berechnen der Mautgebühren meist als Dienstleistung durch einen "Service Provider" erbracht; der Service Provider hat dabei eine bestimmte Leistungsfähigkeit, z.B. einen bestimmten Vermautungsgrad auf einer Mautstrecke, zu garantieren.
Zur Messung der Funktions- und Leistungsfähigkeit eines Straßenmautsystems werden derzeit Flotten von Testfahrzeugen eingesetzt, die beispielsweise vorgegebene Mautstrecken stichprobenartig abfahren, um anschließend die in der Zentrale des Toll Chargers anfallenden Mautgebühren mit den Stichprobenfahrten zu vergleichen. Zur Reduktion des personellen und organisatorischen Aufwands schlägt die
To measure the functionality and performance of a road toll system fleets of test vehicles are currently used, for example, the predetermined toll routes random samples Departure to then compare the tolls incurred in the headquarters of the Toll Chargers with the random checks. To reduce the personnel and organizational effort beats the
Die Erfindung setzt sich zum Ziel, Vorrichtungen und Verfahren zur Funktionsüberprüfung in einem Straßenmautsystem zu schaffen, welche in der Folge eine Verbesserung der Leistungsfähigkeit des Straßenmautsystems und damit eine Erhöhung des Vermautungsgrades ermöglichen.The invention has for its object to provide devices and methods for functional testing in a road toll system, which allow as a result an improvement in the performance of the road toll system and thus an increase in Vermustungsgrades.
Dieses Ziel wird gemäß einem ersten Aspekt der Erfindung mit einer Onboard-Unit der einleitend genannten Art erreicht, die sich auszeichnet durch
einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger angeschlossenen Ausfallsdetektor, welcher dafür ausgebildet ist, auf ein Ausbleiben von Positionsfixen über eine vorgegebene Mindestzeitspanne oder ein Abfallen von Qualitätsmesswerten unter ein vorgegebenes Mindestqualitätsmaß anzusprechen, und
einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger angeschlossenen und vom Ausfallsdetektor gesteuerten Protokollierer, welcher dafür ausgebildet ist, bei Ansprechen des Ausfallsdetektors einen Fehlerdatensatz mit zumindest dem letzten Positionsfix vor dem Ansprechen zu erzeugen,
wobei der Prozessor dafür ausgebildet ist, den Fehlerdatensatz vom Protokollierer zu empfangen und über den Funksendeempfänger zu senden.This object is achieved according to a first aspect of the invention with an onboard unit of the aforementioned type, which is characterized by
a failure detector connected to the satellite navigation receiver adapted to respond to a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop in quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure; and
a logger connected to the satellite navigation receiver and controlled by the failure detector, which is adapted to generate an error record with at least the last position fix before the response when the failure detector responds;
wherein the processor is adapted to receive the error record from the logger and send it via the radio transceiver.
Gemäß einem zweiten Aspekt schafft die Erfindung ein Verfahren zur Funktionsmessung in einem Straßenmautsystem mit einer Zentrale und zumindest einer fahrzeuggestützten Onboard-Unit, die aus Satellitenrohdaten fortlaufend Positionsfixe und zugehörige Qualitätsmesswerte erzeugt und darauf basierende Mautdaten an die Zentrale sendet, umfassend:
- Detektieren eines Ausbleibens von Positionsfixen über eine vorgegebene Mindestzeitspanne oder eines Abfallens von Qualitätsmesswerten unter ein vorgegebenes Mindestqualitätsmaß in der Onboard-Unit,
- im Falle der Detektion, Protokollieren eines Fehlerdatensatzes mit zumindest dem letzten Positionsfix vor der Detektion in der Onboard-Unit,
- Senden des Fehlerdatensatzes von der Onboard-Unit an die Zentrale, und
- Auswerten des Fehlerdatensatzes in der Zentrale.
- Detecting a lack of position fixes over a predetermined minimum time period or a drop of quality measurements below a predetermined minimum quality measure in the onboard unit,
- in the case of detection, logging an error data record with at least the last position fix before the detection in the on-board unit,
- Sending the error record from the onboard unit to the control panel, and
- Evaluation of the error data record in the control center.
Erfindungsgemäß wird dadurch erstmals möglich, die Qualität der GNSS-Positionsbestimmung und -Abdeckung im Straßenmautsystem einer zentralen Auswertung zugänglich zu machen und dadurch kritische GNSS-Fehlerorte im Straßennetz frühzeitig zu bestimmen und anhand des letzten Positionsfixes geographisch zuzuordnen. Anstelle einer bloß stichprobenartigen Leistungsüberprüfung können Positionsermittlungsfehler von GNSS-OBUs sofort oder nur mit kurzer Sendezeitverzögerung kontinuierlich und - bei entsprechender Verbreitung der OBUs - flächendeckend in der Zentrale ausgewertet werden. In der Folge kann auf unterschiedliche GNSS-bedingte Fehler im Straßenmautsystem, z.B. Störsignale, Abschattungen der Satellitensignale etc. und deren Ursachen, z.B. örtliche oder auch mobile Störsignalquellen ("Jammer") oder geographische Gegebenheiten wie Gebirge oder Tunnels, geschlossen werden. So können erstmals an den durch die letzten Positionsfixe jeweils eingegrenzten Fehlerorten zielgerichtet Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung, z.B. das Aufstellen von stationären Positionssendern, Stützbaken, Satellitensignal-Repeatern od.dgl., oder das Identifizieren und Ausschalten von Störsignalquellen etc., eingeleitet werden.According to the invention, this makes it possible for the first time to make the quality of the GNSS position determination and coverage in the road toll system accessible to a central evaluation and thereby to determine critical GNSS fault locations in the road network at an early stage and to allocate them geographically on the basis of the last position fix. Instead of a mere random performance check, position detection errors of GNSS OBUs can be evaluated continuously or, if the OBUs are spread, continuously and at short intervals in the control center. As a result, different GNSS-related errors in the road toll system, e.g. Spurious signals, shadowing of the satellite signals, etc., and their causes, e.g. local or even mobile interference sources ("jammers") or geographical conditions such as mountains or tunnels closed. Thus, for the first time, measures for fault elimination, for example, at the error locations respectively bounded by the last position fixes, can be targeted. the setting up of stationary position transmitters, support beacons, satellite signal repeaters or the like, or the identification and switching off of interference signal sources, etc., are initiated.
Besonders günstig ist es, wenn der von der Onboard-Unit erzeugte Fehlerdatensatz einen Zeitstempel des genannten letzten Positionsfixes enthält. So kann aus einer Mehrzahl von Fehlerdatensätzen verschiedener Onboard-Units bzw. ein und derselben Onboard-Unit zu verschiedenen Tages- bzw. Jahreszeiten auch auf zeitabhängige Fehler und Fehlerursachen, z.B. zeitveränderliche bzw. periodische Störsignale, ungünstige Satellitenkonstellationen oder Abschattung der Satellitensignale in Abhängigkeit von Wetterereignissen oder durch Vegetation während der Wachstumszeiten etc., rückgeschlossen werden. Ferner kann die Bewegung einer mobilen Störsignalquelle genau verfolgt werden, um z.B. "Jammer", die bewusst Störsignale senden, um ein korrektes Vermauten zu behindern, mithilfe von Verkehrskameras und/oder Einsatzfahrzeugen zu identifizieren.It is particularly favorable if the error data record generated by the onboard unit has a time stamp of the last named Contains position fixes. Thus, from a plurality of error data sets of different onboard units or one and the same onboard unit at different times of day or seasons on time-dependent errors and causes of errors, such as time-varying or periodic interference, unfavorable satellite constellations or shadowing of the satellite signals in response to weather events or by vegetation during the growing season, etc., be inferred. Further, the movement of a mobile jamming signal source can be accurately tracked to identify, for example, "jamming" that deliberately sends jamming signals to hinder proper building, using traffic cameras and / or emergency vehicles.
Um die geographischen Bereiche des detektierten Fehlers noch besser abgrenzen zu können, ist es besonders vorteilhaft, wenn der Fehlerdatensatz auch den ersten nach Beendigung des Ansprechens bzw. Detektierens erzeugten Positionsfix enthält. Bevorzugt enthält dabei der Fehlerdatensatz aus den genannten Gründen auch einen Zeitstempel des genannten ersten Positionsfixes.In order to distinguish the geographical areas of the detected error even better, it is particularly advantageous if the error data set also contains the first position fix generated after the completion of the response or detection. For this reason, the error data record preferably also contains a time stamp of the named first position fix.
In einer günstigen Ausführungsform der Erfindung enthält der Fehlerdatensatz auch zumindest einen während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors bzw. Detektierens des Ausfalls erzeugten Qualitätsmesswert. Dadurch kann noch präziser auf Fehlerursachen rückgeschlossen werden. So könnte, wenn der Qualitätsmesswert z.B. die Anzahl der zur Erzeugung des zugehörigen Positionsfixes herangezogenen Satelliten oder einen DOP-Wert (dilution of precision) des zugehörigen Positionsmesswerts enthält, eine - zufällig oder lokal häufig auftretende - ungünstige Satellitenkonstellation erkannt werden. Enthält der Qualitätsmesswert z.B. den jeweiligen Signalpegel der zur Erzeugung des zugehörigen Positionsmesswerts herangezogenen Satelliten und/oder ein Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis der Satellitensignale, so kann auch auf Störsignale bzw. Signaldämpfungen - z.B. infolge von lokalen, gegebenenfalls sogar beweglichen Störsendern oder von Wetterereignissen oder Abschattungen durch Gebirge oder Wald - rückgeschlossen werden.In a favorable embodiment of the invention, the error data set also contains at least one quality measurement value generated during the response of the failure detector or detection of the failure. This makes it possible to draw conclusions about the causes of faults even more precisely. Thus, if the quality measurement contains, for example, the number of satellites used to generate the associated position fix or a DOP value (Dilution of Precision) of the associated position measurement value, an unfavorable satellite constellation could be detected - accidentally or locally frequently. If, for example, the quality measured value contains the respective signal level of the satellite used to generate the associated position measured value and / or a signal / noise ratio of the satellite signals, then interference signals or signal attenuation can also be caused, for example as a result of local, possibly even mobile jammers or from weather events or shadowing by mountains or forest.
Es versteht sich, dass ein Fehlerdatensatz nicht nur einen, sondern auch eine Folge von während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerten enthalten kann, was eine Auswertung des Verlaufs der Qualitätsmesswerte und damit noch genauere Schlussfolgerungen z.B. über möglicherweise unterschiedliche Fehlerursachen erlaubt.It will be appreciated that an error record may include not only one but also a series of quality measurements generated during the response of the failure detector, resulting in an evaluation of the history of the quality measurements and thus more accurate conclusions, e.g. allowed over possibly different error causes.
Bevorzugt enthält der Fehlerdatensatz auch während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors bzw. Detektierens des Ausfalls empfangene Satellitenrohdaten und/oder in einem Sensorelement erzeugte Sensormesswerte, wodurch für ein späteres Ermitteln möglicher Fehlerursachen weitere Grundlagen geschaffen werden.The error data record preferably also contains satellite raw data received during the response of the failure detector or detecting the failure and / or sensor measured values generated in a sensor element, thereby providing further bases for a later determination of possible causes of the error.
Besonders günstig ist es, wenn der Ausfallsdetektor einen Watchdog enthält, welcher von jedem erzeugten Positionsfix neu anstoßbar ist. Dies stellt einen besonders einfachen, zuverlässigen Baustein für den Ausfallsdetektor dar.It is particularly favorable if the failure detector contains a watchdog which is newly abuttable by each position fix generated. This represents a particularly simple, reliable component for the failure detector.
In einer weiteren bevorzugten Ausführungsform des erfindungsgemäßen Verfahrens wird in der Zentrale zumindest ein zweiter, von einer zweiten Onboard-Unit in der genannten Weise erzeugter und gesandter Fehlerdatensatz empfangen und die Fehlerdatensätze der zumindest zwei Onboard-Units werden beim Auswerten gegeneinander validiert. Dadurch können zeitliche Änderungen möglicher Fehlerursachen einfacher berücksichtigt und individuelle Fehler oder Störungen einzelner Onboard-Units, z.B. infolge einer unsachgemäßen Anordnung im Fahrzeug, ausgeglichen werden. Zugleich steigt mit der Anzahl der verfügbaren Onboard-Units bei der Auswertung der Fehlerdatensätze deren Aussagekraft in Bezug auf mögliche Fehlerursachen.In a further preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention, at least one second error data record generated and sent by a second on-board unit in the manner mentioned is received in the center, and the error data records of the at least two on-board units are validated against one another during the evaluation. Thereby temporal changes of possible causes of faults can be considered more easily and individual faults or faults of individual onboard units, e.g. due to an improper arrangement in the vehicle, be compensated. At the same time, the number of available onboard units in the evaluation of the error data sets increases their informative value with regard to possible causes of error.
Besonders günstig ist es, wenn beim Auswerten durch einen Abgleich der Fehlerdatensätze mit einer digitalen Landkarte geographische Störungs- und Abschattungsbereiche des Satellitenempfangs bestimmt werden. Dadurch wird eine "Landkarte von GNSS-Fehlern" erzeugt, welche mit geographischen Gegebenheiten, z.B. hohen Bergen, engen Tälern, Tunnels etc. abgeglichen werden kann. Auf diese Weise sind naturgegebene von technisch bedingten Fehlerursachen leichter unterscheidbar, und Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung können in die Wege geleitet werden.It is particularly advantageous if geographic interference and shading ranges of the satellite reception are determined during evaluation by matching the error data records with a digital map. This creates a "map of GNSS errors" that are matched to geographic conditions such as high mountains, narrow valleys, tunnels, etc. can. In this way, inherent technical causes of error are more easily distinguishable and remedial actions can be initiated.
Die Erfindung wird nachfolgend anhand eines in den beigeschlossenen Zeichnungen dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiels näher erläutert. In den Zeichnungen zeigt:
-
Fig. 1 ein Straßenmautsystem mit fahrzeuggestützten Onboard-Units gemäß der Erfindung in einer schematischen Draufsicht; -
Fig. 2 ein Blockschaltbild einer der Onboard-Units vonFig. 1 ; und -
Fig. 3 beispielhafte Daten- und Signaldiagramme, die in der Onboard-Unit vonFig. 2 und während der Ausführung des Verfahrens der Erfindung auftreten.
-
Fig. 1 a road toll system with vehicle-mounted on-board units according to the invention in a schematic plan view; -
Fig. 2 a block diagram of one of the onboard units ofFig. 1 ; and -
Fig. 3 exemplary data and signal diagrams contained in the onboard unit ofFig. 2 and occur during the performance of the method of the invention.
Gemäß
Jeder Qualitätsmesswert qi eines Positionsfixes pi kann dabei verschiedene Qualitätsparameter beinhalten, beispielsweise Anzahl, Signalpegel und/oder Signal/Rausch-Verhältnis der Signale 6 der zur Bestimmung des jeweiligen Positionsfixes pi herangezogenen Navigationssatelliten 7, z.B. auch in ausgewerteter Form von DOP-Werten (dilution of precision), wie sie von handelsüblichen Satellitennavigationsempfängern 5 für jeden Positionsfix pi zur Verfügung gestellt werden.Each quality measurement q i of a position fix p i can contain various quality parameters, for example the number, signal level and / or signal / noise ratio of the
Zusätzlich zu den Positionsfixen pi und ihren Qualitätsmesswerten qi kann der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 auch die diesen zugrundeliegenden "rohen" Satellitendaten, z.B. Ausschnitte der Satellitensignale 6, oder im Verlauf der Erzeugung der Positionsfixe pi gebildete Verarbeitungsdaten ausgeben, im Weiteren "Satellitenrohdaten" ri genannt. Die Ausgabe der Positionsfixe pi, Qualitätsmesswerte qi bzw. Satellitenrohdaten ri kann dabei auf voneinander gesonderten Ausgängen des Satellitennavigationsempfängers 5, auf einem gemeinsamen Ausgang im Multiplexing oder auf einem gemeinsamen Bus in gesonderten Datenpaketen erfolgen.In addition to the position fixes p i and their quality measurements q i , the
Die Onboard-Unit 2 ist ferner mit einem Funksendeempfänger 8, z.B. nach einem 2G-, 3G-, 4G- oder 5G-Mobilfunkstandard wie GSM, UMTS oder LTE, dem ITS-G5- oder WAVE-Standard für Kurzreichweiten-Funkkommunikation, einem der IEEE 802.11-Standards für WLAN-Kommunikation od.dgl., und einem an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 und den Funksendeempfänger 8 angeschlossenen Prozessor 9 ausgestattet.The on-
Optional können auch ein oder mehrere Sensorelemente 10, z.B. Geschwindigkeits- oder Beschleunigungssensoren, vorgesehen sein, welche in der Onboard-Unit 2 selbst oder - mit der Onboard-Unit 2 verbunden - im Fahrzeug 3 angeordnet sein können und Sensormesswerte mi, z.B. Geschwindigkeits-, Beschleunigungs- oder daraus approximierte Ortsmesswerte, erzeugen. Ein solches Sensorelement 10 kann auch durch den Funksendeempfänger 8 gebildet sein, in welchem Fall die Sensormesswerte mi Metadaten des Funksendeempfängers 8 sind, z.B. Funkzellen- oder Empfangsfeldstärkedaten einer Funkverbindung 11 mit einer Funkstation 12, hier einer Basisstation eines Mobilfunknetzes, in dem sich der Funksendeempfänger 8 befindet.Optional may also be one or
Der Prozessor 9 erzeugt aus der Folge {pi} von Positionsfixen pi Mautdaten M, um diese mithilfe des Funksendeempfängers 8 über die Funkverbindung 11 und die Funkstation 12 an eine Zentrale 13 des Straßenmautsystems 1 zu senden.The
Die Mautdaten M können z.B. Mautgebühren sein, die durch einen Kartenabgleich ("map-matching") der Positionsfixfolge {pi} mit einer in der Onboard-Unit 2 hinterlegten digitalen Karte mautpflichtiger Straßen 4 bzw. Orte erzeugt werden. Alternativ könnten die Mautdaten M auch die Positionsfixe pi selbst sein, welche einzeln oder - wenn gewünscht nach Qualität gefiltert - zu einem Bündel zusammengefasst zu beliebigen oder vorgegebenen Zeitpunkten, nach vorgegebenen Strecken oder einfach bei Verfügbarkeit einer Funkverbindung 11 über den Funksendeempfänger 8 gesendet werden. Im letztgenannten Fall können Kartenabgleich und Gebührenberechnung beispielsweise in der Zentrale 13 erfolgen.The toll data M may be, for example, tolls, which are generated by a map matching of the position fix sequence {p i } with a
Gemäß
Um Fehler der Positionsbestimmung der Onboard-Unit 2 und damit der Vermautungsfunktion des Straßenmautsystems 1 z.B. infolge von Signal-Störungen und/oder Abschattungen der Satellitensignale 6 erfassen und messen zu können, dienen die folgenden Komponenten und Verfahren.To errors of the position determination of the on-
Die Onboard-Unit 2 verfügt dazu über einen an den Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 angeschlossenen Ausfallsdetektor 15, welcher anspricht und ein Ausgangssignal s (
Zur Detektion des Ereignisses (a) kann der Ausfallsdetektor 15 einen Watchdog 16 aufweisen, z.B. in Form eines Totmann- bzw. retriggerbaren Monoflop-Schaltkreises, der von jedem neuen Positionsfix pi an seinem Eingang erneut für die Mindestzeitspanne δ angestoßen wird und somit an seinem (hier: invertierten) Ausgang ein Detektionssignal d (
Alternativ oder zusätzlich zum Watchdog 16 kann der Ausfallsdetektor 15 zur Detektion des Ereignisses (b) einen Komparator 17 aufweisen, welcher die einlangenden Qualitätsmesswerte qi mit einem Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin vergleicht und bei einem Abfallen der Qualitätsmesswerte qi unter das Mindestqualitätsmaß Qmin ein Ausgangssignal c (
Die Ausgangssignale c des Watchdogs 16 und d des Komparators 17 können z.B. durch einen einfachen ODER-Schaltkreis 18 zu dem Ausgangssignal s des Ausfallsdetektors 15 verknüpft werden. Anstelle des ODER-Schaltkreises 18 kann auch eine komplexe Auswertelogik, welche z.B. auch das Zeitverhalten der Signale c und d mitberücksichtigt, vorgesehen werden. Wenn der Ausfallsdetektor 15 nur eine der Komponenten Watchdog 16 oder Komparator 17 enthält, entfällt der Schaltkreis 18 und das Ausgangssignal s fällt mit dem Signal c bzw. d zusammen.The output signals c of the
Das vom Ausfallsdetektor 15 erzeugte Ausgangssignal s steuert einen Protokollierer 19 an, welcher im Falle der genannten Ereignisse (a) und/oder (b) einen Fehlerdatensatz F erzeugt und für den Prozessor 9 zum Senden über den Funksendeempfänger 8 an die Zentrale 13 bereithält. Wie in
Als Fehlerdatensatz F zeichnet der Protokollierer 19 im einfachsten Fall den letzten Positionsfix pm auf, den der Satellitennavigationsempfänger 5 gerade noch vor dem Ansprechen des Ausfallsdetektors 15 erzeugt hat, siehe
- einen Zeitstempel tm des genannten letzten Positionsfixes pm;
- den ersten unmittelbar nach Beendigung des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 erzeugten Positionsfix pn, wenn gewünscht auch mit zugehörigem Zeitstempel tn;
- die zum genannten letzten und/oder ersten Pösitionsmesswert pm, pn erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerte qm und/oder qn;
- einen oder mehrere der während des Ansprechens des
Ausfallsdetektors 15, d.h. solange der Protokollierer 19 angesteuert (s = "1") ist, erzeugten Qualitätsmesswerte qi, wenn gewünscht auch mit zugehörigen Zeitstempeln ti; - die zum genannten letzten und/oder ersten Positionsmesswert pm, pn und/oder während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 (s = "1") empfangenen - bzw. gebildeten - Satellitenrohdaten ri; und/oder
- die etwa zeitgleich mit dem genannten letzten und/oder ersten Positionsmesswert pm, pn und/oder während des Ansprechens des Ausfallsdetektors 15 (s = "1") erzeugten Sensormesswerte mi .
- a time stamp t m of said last position fix p m ;
- the first position fix p n generated immediately after completion of the response of the
failure detector 15, if desired also with the associated time stamp t n ; - the last-mentioned to and / or first Pösitionsmesswert m p quality metrics generated p n q m and / or q n;
- one or more of the generated during the response of the
failure detector 15, ie as long as thelogger 19 is driven (s = "1"), generated quality measurements q i , if desired, with associated timestamps t i ; - the said last and / or first position measurement value p m , p n and / or during the response of the failure detector 15 (s = "1") received - or formed - satellite raw data r i ; and or
- the sensor measured values m i generated approximately at the same time as the last and / or first position measured value p m , p n and / or during the response of the failure detector 15 (s = "1").
Optional kann der Protokollierer 19 den Fehlerdatensatz F beispielsweise durch Ausscheiden redundanter oder irrelevanter Daten, Ergänzen um Umfeld-Daten aus der Umgebung der Onboard-Unit 2 oder interne Zustandsdaten der Onboard-Unit 2, Datenzusammenfassung etc. situationsabhängig vorverarbeiten.Optionally, the
In der Zentrale 13 werden die empfangenen Fehlerdatensätze F ausgewertet. Diese Auswertung kann einerseits einzeln erfolgen, d.h. die Fehlerdatensätze F einer Onboard-Unit 2 werden für sich betrachtet, andererseits können auch mehrere Fehlerdatensätze F verschiedener Onboard-Units 2 empfangen, gemeinsam ausgewertet und dabei z.B. gegeneinander validiert werden.In the
Beim Auswerten werden die Fehlerdatensätze F in Abhängigkeit vom Ort der darin angegebenen Positionsfixe pm, pn, {pi} und, wenn erfasst, deren Zeitstempeln tm, tn, {ti}, Qualitätsmesswerten qm, qn, {qi}, Satellitenrohdaten {ri} und/oder Sensormesswerte {mi} betrachtet und auf mögliche Fehlerquellen hin analysiert, um Maßnahmen zu deren Beseitigung vorzubereiten. Optional können beim Auswerten durch einen Abgleich der Fehlerdatensätze F mit einer digitalen Landkarte geographische Störungs- und Abschattungsbereiche 14 des Satellitenempfangs ebenso wie gegebenenfalls deren Zeitabhängigkeit bestimmt werden. So können dauerhafte Abschattungen, z.B. durch Tunnels, erkannt und von vorübergehenden Abschattungen, z.B. in engen Tälern, wo nur zeitweise eine ausreichende Anzahl an Satellitensignalen 6 in erforderlicher Stärke empfangbar ist, unterschieden werden, oder wetterbedingte Signalabschwächungen oder jahreszeitabhängige Abschattungen in dichter Vegetation von fixen oder beweglichen Störquellen ("Jammern") usw. usf. In der Folge können zielgerichtete Maßnahmen zur Fehlerbeseitigung eingeleitet werden, um den Vermautungsgrad des Straßenmautsystems 1 zu erhöhen, z.B. stationäre Positionssender bzw. Satellitensignal-Repeater errichtet oder Störquellen eliminiert oder abgeschaltet bzw. bewusstes Senden von Störsignalen durch Jammer verfolgt und geahndet werden.In the evaluation, the error data sets F are determined as a function of the position fixes p m , p n , {p i } and, if detected, their time stamps t m , t n , {t i }, quality measurements q m , q n , { q i }, raw satellite data {r i } and / or sensor readings {m i } are considered and analyzed for possible sources of error in order to prepare measures for their elimination. Optionally, when evaluating the error data sets F with a digital map, geographic interference and
Die Erfindung ist nicht auf die dargestellten Ausführungsformen beschränkt, sondern umfasst alle Varianten und Modifikationen, die in den Rahmen der angeschlossenen Ansprüche fallen. So können die Onboard-Unit 2 im Ganzen bzw. einzelne ihrer Komponenten wie der Ausfallsdetektor 15, der Protokollierer 19 oder Teile davon sowohl als Hardwarebausteine als auch als Softwareobjekte, z.B. im Prozessor 9, implementiert werden.The invention is not limited to the illustrated embodiments, but includes all variants and modifications that fall within the scope of the appended claims. Thus, the
Claims (15)
- Onboard unit for a road toll system (1), comprising
a satellite navigation receiver (5) for continuously generating position fixes (pi) and associated quality measurement values (qi) from satellite raw data (ri),
a radio transceiver (8), and
a processor (9) connected to these components (5, 8), which is configured to generate toll data (M) from the position fixes (pi) and to send the toll data via the radio transceiver (8),
characterized by
an outage detector (15) connected to the satellite navigation receiver (5), which outage detector (15) is configured to respond to an absence of position fixes (pi) over a given minimum time span (δ) or to a drop in quality measurement values (qi) under a given minimum quality measurement (Qmin), and
a recorder (19) connected to the satellite navigation receiver (5) and controlled by the outage detector (15), which recorder (19) is configured to generate, when the outage detector (15) responds, an error dataset (F) with at least the last position fix (pm) before the response,
wherein the processor (9) is configured to receive the error dataset (F) from the recorder (19) and to send it via the radio transceiver (8). - Onboard unit according to claim 1, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tm) of said last position fix (pm).
- Onboard unit according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains the first position fix (pn) generated after the response has finished.
- Onboard unit according to claim 3, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tn) of said first position fix (pn).
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains at least one quality measurement value (qi) generated during responding.
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 5, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains satellite raw data (ri) received during responding and/or sensor measurement values (mi) generated in a sensor element (10).
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the outage detector (15) contains a watchdog (16), which can be triggered anew by each generated position fix (pi).
- Method for function surveillance in a road toll system (1) with a central station (13) and at least one vehicle mounted onboard unit (2), which continuously generates position fixes (pi) and associated quality measurement values (qi) from satellite raw data (ri) and sends toll data (M) based thereupon to the central station (13), comprising:detecting an absence of position fixes (pi) over a given minimum time span (δ) or a drop in quality measurement values (qi) under a given minimum quality measurement (Qmin) in the onboard unit (2), andin case of a detection, recording an error dataset (F) with at least the last position fix (pm) before the detection in the onboard unit (2),sending the error dataset (F) from the onboard unit (2) to the central station (13), andevaluating the error dataset (F) in the central station (13).
- Method according to claim 8, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tm) of said last position fix (pm).
- Method according to claim 8 or 9, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains the first position fix (pn) generated after the detection has finished.
- Onboard unit according to claim 10, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains a time stamp (tn) of said first position fix (pn).
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 11, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains at least one quality measurement value (qi) generated during detecting.
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 12, characterized in that the error dataset (F) also contains satellite raw data (ri) received during detecting and/or sensor measurement values (mi) generated in a sensor element (10).
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 13, characterized in that in the central station (13) at least a second error dataset (F), generated and sent by a second onboard unit (2) in said manner, is received and in that the error datasets (F) of the at least two onboard units (2) are validated against each other during evaluating.
- Onboard unit according to any one of the claims 8 to 14, characterized in that, during evaluating, geographical interference and shadowing regions (14) of the satellite reception are determined by comparing the error datasets (F) with a digital map.
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14161986.6A EP2924662B2 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
PT141619866T PT2924662T (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
ES14161986T ES2599783T5 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | On-board equipment and procedure for functional control in a road toll system |
SI201430083A SI2924662T1 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
PL14161986T PL2924662T3 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
DK14161986.6T DK2924662T3 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | ONBOARD DEVICE AND PROCEDURE FOR FUNCTION MONITORING IN A ROAD CIRCUIT SYSTEM |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14161986.6A EP2924662B2 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2924662A1 EP2924662A1 (en) | 2015-09-30 |
EP2924662B1 true EP2924662B1 (en) | 2016-08-03 |
EP2924662B2 EP2924662B2 (en) | 2022-08-10 |
Family
ID=50424013
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP14161986.6A Active EP2924662B2 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2014-03-27 | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2924662B2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2924662T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2599783T5 (en) |
PL (1) | PL2924662T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT2924662T (en) |
SI (1) | SI2924662T1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102016002768C5 (en) | 2016-03-05 | 2024-05-02 | Audi Ag | Method for operating a communication network comprising several motor vehicles and motor vehicle |
EP3279870A1 (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2018-02-07 | Toll Collect GmbH | Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device |
EP3279692B1 (en) * | 2016-08-01 | 2023-10-11 | Toll Collect GmbH | Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device |
EP3339906B1 (en) * | 2016-12-22 | 2023-03-29 | Toll Collect GmbH | Method, system, device and computer program product for signalling an impending lack of operability of a position detecting apparatus, and fee charging system |
DE102018220793A1 (en) * | 2018-12-03 | 2020-06-04 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Detection of incorrect position determinations |
US11892546B2 (en) | 2020-07-30 | 2024-02-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for detecting and mitigating spoofed satellite navigation signals |
US11815607B2 (en) | 2020-07-30 | 2023-11-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receiver operation during spoofing |
CN115183783B (en) * | 2022-09-09 | 2022-12-13 | 中国人民解放军32035部队 | Association method of orbit measurement data after launching and entering orbit of group satellite |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5969595A (en) | 1996-07-22 | 1999-10-19 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Security for transport vehicles and cargo |
EP1696207A1 (en) | 2005-02-23 | 2006-08-30 | Vodafone Holding GmbH | Method and system for determining an object's position data |
WO2006105380A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Trimble Navigation Limited | A portable motion-activated position reporting device |
US20070005243A1 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Learning, storing, analyzing, and reasoning about the loss of location-identifying signals |
EP2187229A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 | 2010-05-19 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for detecting GNSS jammers |
EP2487506A1 (en) | 2011-02-10 | 2012-08-15 | Toll Collect GmbH | Positioning device, method and computer program product for signalling that a positioning device is not functioning as intended |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
PL2665044T3 (en) | 2012-05-16 | 2015-04-30 | Kapsch Trafficcom Ag | Method for measuring the capacity of a toll system |
-
2014
- 2014-03-27 PL PL14161986T patent/PL2924662T3/en unknown
- 2014-03-27 SI SI201430083A patent/SI2924662T1/en unknown
- 2014-03-27 ES ES14161986T patent/ES2599783T5/en active Active
- 2014-03-27 PT PT141619866T patent/PT2924662T/en unknown
- 2014-03-27 DK DK14161986.6T patent/DK2924662T3/en active
- 2014-03-27 EP EP14161986.6A patent/EP2924662B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5969595A (en) | 1996-07-22 | 1999-10-19 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Security for transport vehicles and cargo |
EP1696207A1 (en) | 2005-02-23 | 2006-08-30 | Vodafone Holding GmbH | Method and system for determining an object's position data |
WO2006105380A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Trimble Navigation Limited | A portable motion-activated position reporting device |
US20070005243A1 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2007-01-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Learning, storing, analyzing, and reasoning about the loss of location-identifying signals |
EP2187229A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 | 2010-05-19 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Device for detecting GNSS jammers |
EP2487506A1 (en) | 2011-02-10 | 2012-08-15 | Toll Collect GmbH | Positioning device, method and computer program product for signalling that a positioning device is not functioning as intended |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
Title |
---|
"Magellan Systems Corporation", 1992, article "Bedienungsanleitung Magellan GPS NAV 5000D", pages: 1 - 21, XP055380848 |
"Positioning Systems in Intelligent Transportation Systems", ARTECH HOUSE, Boston, London, ISBN: 978-0-89006-536-5, article DRANE, RIZOS, XP055380851 |
"Produkte zur Mauterhebung - Mobility - Siemens", MOBILITY.SIEMENS.COM, 23 June 2013 (2013-06-23), pages 1 - 2, XP055380865, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.mobility.siemens.com/mobility/qlobal/de/nahverkehr/strassenverkehr/ mautsysteme-fuer-staedte/produkte-mauterhebung/Seiten/produkte-zur-mauterhebung.aspx> |
"Watchdog", WIKIPEDIA, 23 May 2013 (2013-05-23), pages 1 - 2, XP055380869, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchdog> |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
SI2924662T1 (en) | 2016-12-30 |
ES2599783T3 (en) | 2017-02-03 |
PT2924662T (en) | 2016-10-27 |
EP2924662B2 (en) | 2022-08-10 |
ES2599783T5 (en) | 2022-11-28 |
DK2924662T3 (en) | 2016-11-21 |
PL2924662T3 (en) | 2017-01-31 |
EP2924662A1 (en) | 2015-09-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2924662B1 (en) | Onboard unit and method for functional monitoring in a road toll system | |
DE102008012660A1 (en) | Server-based warning of dangers | |
DE60007279T2 (en) | MONITORING SYSTEM FOR TERRESTRIC NAVIGATION AND FLIGHT LANDING SYSTEMS | |
DE102016209568B3 (en) | Methods, apparatus and computer programs for capturing measurement results from mobile devices | |
DE102011051100A1 (en) | Method for providing correction signals for terminal of satellite supported position determining system, involves determining position of mobile reference device for unit of position determining system in form of position data | |
DE102013107962A1 (en) | Method for monitoring components of a system, cooperative driver assistance system, infrastructure and computer program | |
WO2018210487A1 (en) | Method, device, and system for determining a weather area | |
EP2811468B1 (en) | Method and device for error detection in a toll system | |
DE102012215601A1 (en) | Method and device for determining a value of a motion-dependent variable | |
EP3495847B1 (en) | Tachograph assembly and method for operating same | |
DE2341162A1 (en) | Vehicle location monitoring system - has range and travel direction sensors to provide signal for memory | |
EP3279870A1 (en) | Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device | |
DE102016206526A1 (en) | Method for providing field strength information and for position determination | |
EP2665044B1 (en) | Method for measuring the capacity of a toll system | |
DE102018000682A1 (en) | Method and server for collecting driver activity data | |
EP3279692A1 (en) | Data processing device, system and method for verifying performance of a specified function of a position determination device | |
DE102017212953A1 (en) | Determination of odometric data of a rail vehicle with the aid of stationary sensors | |
DE102021104439A1 (en) | Method for detecting at least one GNSS interference source using multiple vehicles | |
EP2922031B1 (en) | Method and devices for error detection in a toll system | |
EP1870843A1 (en) | Method and system for determining the travel route concurrence of two moving objects | |
DE102018007020A1 (en) | Mobile phones as sensors for driver assistance systems | |
DE102023112115A1 (en) | Method and terminal for monitoring a toll collection application | |
EP3339906B1 (en) | Method, system, device and computer program product for signalling an impending lack of operability of a position detecting apparatus, and fee charging system | |
EP3339907B1 (en) | Method for signalling a malfunction of a position detecting apparatus, signalling system, fee charging system, position determination device and computer program product | |
EP4462391A1 (en) | Method, terminal and system for monitoring a toll collection application |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20141008 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20151210 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 817793 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502014001206 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Ref document number: 2924662 Country of ref document: PT Date of ref document: 20161027 Kind code of ref document: T Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20161020 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 Effective date: 20161115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D Ref country code: NO Ref legal event code: T2 Effective date: 20160803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161203 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SK Ref legal event code: T3 Ref document number: E 22426 Country of ref document: SK |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2599783 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20170203 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161104 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502014001206 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161103 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: TOLL COLLECT GMBH Effective date: 20170503 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170327 |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: TOLL COLLECT GMBH Effective date: 20170503 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170327 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20140327 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20220321 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20220323 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20220321 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20220325 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20220317 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20220317 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: NO Payment date: 20220323 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20220321 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20220322 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20220325 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20220810 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502014001206 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: RPEO |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: DC2A Ref document number: 2599783 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T5 Effective date: 20221128 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220810 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221221 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20221110 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220810 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Payment date: 20230316 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230513 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20230327 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230327 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230327 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240321 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230327 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240328 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20240426 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 20221110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 20221110 |