EP2863694B1 - Allocation method for control channel candidate number and blind detection frequency, base station and user equipment - Google Patents
Allocation method for control channel candidate number and blind detection frequency, base station and user equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2863694B1 EP2863694B1 EP12887840.2A EP12887840A EP2863694B1 EP 2863694 B1 EP2863694 B1 EP 2863694B1 EP 12887840 A EP12887840 A EP 12887840A EP 2863694 B1 EP2863694 B1 EP 2863694B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- aggregation levels
- epdcch
- aggregation
- blind detection
- base station
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims description 173
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 56
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 claims description 536
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 claims description 536
- 230000001174 ascending effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 24
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000013256 coordination polymer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/20—Control channels or signalling for resource management
- H04W72/23—Control channels or signalling for resource management in the downlink direction of a wireless link, i.e. towards a terminal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/0001—Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
- H04L5/0003—Two-dimensional division
- H04L5/0005—Time-frequency
- H04L5/0007—Time-frequency the frequencies being orthogonal, e.g. OFDM(A), DMT
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W72/00—Local resource management
- H04W72/04—Wireless resource allocation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
- H04L5/0053—Allocation of signaling, i.e. of overhead other than pilot signals
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
- Y02D30/70—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks
Definitions
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of wireless communications, and in particular, to a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates and the number of blind detection times, a base station, and a user equipment.
- a long term evolution (Long Term Evolution, LTE) Rel-8/9/10 communications system employs a dynamic scheduling technology to improve system performance, that is, an evolved NodeB (evolved NodeB, eNB) schedules and allocates resources according to a channel state of each user equipment (User Equipment, UE), so that each scheduled user performs communication on an optimal channel of the user.
- eNB evolved NodeB
- UE User Equipment
- the eNB sends a physical downlink shared channel (Physical Downlink Shared Channel, PDSCH) and a physical downlink control channel (Physical Downlink Control Channel, PDCCH) corresponding to the PDSCH to each scheduled UE according to a result of the dynamic scheduling, where the PDSCH bears data that the eNB sends to the UE, and accordingly, the PDCCH is mainly used for indicating a transmission format or scheduling information of the PDSCH, for example, resource allocation, a transport block size, a modulation and coding scheme a transmission rank, precoding matrix information, and so on.
- PDSCH Physical Downlink Shared Channel
- PDCCH Physical Downlink Control Channel
- all PDCCHs used for uplink and downlink scheduling are multiplexed on N control channel elements (Control Channel Element, CCE) in a PDCCH region, where N is greater than 1, and the control channel elements are numbered from 0.
- CCE Control Channel Element
- Each PDCCH is an aggregation of L consecutive CCEs, where L is one of 1, 2, 4, or 8, that is, the PDCCH has four aggregation levels in total.
- the number of CCEs aggregated in each PDCCH is determined by the size of an information block size in the PDCCH and a channel state of a UE corresponding to the PDCCH.
- the N CCEs multiplexed in the PDCCH region are interleaved, and then the interleaved CCEs are mapped to a reserved RE in the PDCCH region in sequence and sent.
- the UE needs to perform blind detection on the N CCEs to obtain a PDCCH corresponding to the UE.
- PDCCH candidates are limited. The less the candidate PDCCHs are, the less the number of blind detection times of the UE is. For example, in the prior art, when the CCE aggregation level L is equal to 8, the number of PDCCH candidates is 2, that is, only CCE 0 to CCE 7 and CCE 8 to CCE 15 need to be detected.
- the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level is still in positive correlation with the number N of CCEs in the PDCCH region, that is, the number of blind detection times increases as the N increases.
- the maximum number of times of blind detection that the UE needs to perform is defined, which is called a search space.
- Search spaces are classified into a common search space and a UE-specific search space, and the difference between the two lies in that a location of a start CCE in the common search space is fixed while a start CCE in the UE-specific search space is determined by an identifier of the UE and a subframe number of a subframe where the PDCCH is located.
- the common search space and the UE-specific search space may overlap each other.
- An existing PDCCH is enhanced in LTE Rel-11, that is, a part of resources in a PDSCH region are divided to transmit an enhanced physical downlink control channel (Enhanced Physical Downlink Control Channel, EPDCCH), so that resources assigned to the control channel are more flexible, and are no longer limited by three orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, OFDM) symbols.
- the EPDCCH may use a transmission manner based on a demodulation reference signal (Demodulation Reference Signal, DMRS) to implement spatial reuse, so as to improve transmission efficiency of the control channel.
- DMRS Demodulation Reference Signal
- control channels of UEs serving different radio remote units may occupy the same time frequency resource as long as being desirably isolated in space, and in this way, the capacity of the PDCCH or the number of UEs scheduled at the same time is improved.
- Radio Remote Unit Radio Remote Unit
- aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH are 2, 4, 8 or 16; and in other cases, aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH are 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16.
- the total number of blind detection times of the UE is 32 (in a special case such as multiple-input multiple-output (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output, MIMO), the total number of blind detection times of the UE is 48).
- MIMO Multiple-Input Multiple-Output
- the number of blind detection times is assigned to the aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH, and then is assigned among EPDCCH sets corresponding to each aggregation level.
- Transmission formats that can be supported by the EPDCCH mainly include downlink control information (Downlink Control Information, DCI) format series 1X, including 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, and the like; DCI format series 2X, including 2, 2A, 2B, 2C, and the like; and DCI formats 0, 4, and the like used for indicating a data transmission format of an uplink traffic channel.
- DCI format series 2X is generally much greater than that of the DCI format series 1X.
- aggregation levels that can be supported by an EPDCCH are determined by the comparison between the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair in a search space where the EPDCCH is located and a predetermined threshold.
- a transmission code rate of the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A is not greater than 0.8, but this conclusion is not applicable to an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X.
- the transmission code rate of the EPDCCH is not greater than 0.8.
- the transmission code rate thereof is within a certain threshold, and the transmission code rate thereof is even possibly greater than 1.
- the determined lowest aggregation level may not support data transmission in the DCI format series 2X.
- the UE skips blind detection for the DCI format series 2X at the lowest aggregation level, and only detects EPDCCH candidates transmitted in the DCI format series 2X at other aggregation levels.
- sizes of the control channel elements are not balanced, and sizes of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to a certain aggregation level are not balanced either, which may lead to a phenomenon that at the same aggregation level, some EPDCCH candidates support transmission in the DCI format series 2X, while some EPDCCH candidates do not support transmission in the DCI format series 2X.
- the UE also skips the EPDCCH candidates that do not support the transmission in the DCI format series 2X, which decreases the utilization of the number of EPDCCH candidates and the number of blind detection times.
- Document 3GPP R1-124555 Patent, "EPDCCH search space and aggregation levels ") discloses a method for how to split the blind decoding trials among EPDCCH sets and how to dertermin EPDCCH candidates within each EPDCCH set.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates and the number of blind detection times, a base station, and a user equipment, which improve the utilization of EPDCCH candidates and the number of blind detection times.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to an aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- GSM Global System of Mobile communication
- CDMA code division multiple access
- WCDMA wideband code division multiple access
- GPRS General Packet Radio Service
- LTE Long Term Evolution
- LTE-A advanced long term evolution
- Universal Mobile Telecommunication System Universal Mobile Telecommunication System
- a user equipment includes but is not limited to a mobile station (Mobile Station, MS), a mobile terminal (Mobile Terminal), a mobile telephone (Mobile Telephone), a handset (handset), portable equipment (portable equipment), and the like, and the user equipment may communicate with one or more core networks through a radio access network (Radio Access Network, RAN).
- the user equipment may be a mobile telephone (or called a "cellular" phone), a computer with a wireless communication function, and the user equipment may also be a portable mobile apparatus, a pocket-sized mobile apparatus, a handheld mobile apparatus, a computer built-in mobile apparatus, or a vehicle-mounted mobile apparatus.
- FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the method in FIG. 1 is executed by a base station, which, for example, may be an eNB in the LTE technology, and may also be a radio network controller (Radio Network Controller, RNC) in the WCDMA technology.
- a base station which, for example, may be an eNB in the LTE technology, and may also be a radio network controller (Radio Network Controller, RNC) in the WCDMA technology.
- RNC Radio Network Controller
- 102 Determine a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , where ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , M ⁇ N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- the number of EPDCCH candidates that the base station needs to assign may be the same as the number of blind detection times of a UE. For example, when the UE supports 32 times of blind detection, the base station may assign 32 EPDCCH candidates to the UE; when the UE employs an uplink MIMO technology, the number of blind detection times that can be supported by the UE is 48, and the base station may assign 48 EPDCCH candidates to the UE. It should be understood that, the number of EPDCCH candidates assigned by the base station may also be different from the number of blind detection times supported by the UE, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.
- N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH is a generalized concept, and may not refer in particular to a certain EPDCCH; moreover, the base station may determine the N aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH before actually sending the EPDCCH; the EPDCCH to be detected may be a specific EPDCCH in a certain subframe.
- step 102 may include: determining (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determining the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the present invention does not limit the specific assignment manner for assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ ; the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned evenly, or assigned proportionally, or assigned randomly. In addition, the present invention does not limit the assignment sequence either; the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order of the aggregation levels, or assigned according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; the EPDCCH candidates may be completely assigned in one time, or assigned in several times.
- the assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ may include: assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assigning P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- P1 and P2 may be determined in advance; or, an assignment rule may be determined in advance, and P2 EPDCCH candidates remain after the assignment based on the rule, while P1 is not determined in advance but is obtained after the assignment based on the rule.
- the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: evenly assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- each aggregation level is assigned with 2.5 EPDCCH candidates.
- the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the assignment manner of P2; the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned based on a certain rule, or assigned randomly; a part of the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned first, and then the rest are assigned; the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned completely, or some of the P2 EPDCCH candidates may remain.
- the assigning P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time may include: cyclically assigning one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assigning one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- EPDCCH candidates among P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned based on the same rule, that is, the assignment is performed cyclically in sequence.
- the determining a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ may include: determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected may include: determining at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- the base station may determine a first threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A, and the first threshold may also be used for an EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X.
- the base station may also determine a second threshold for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X, and the second threshold may also be used for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A; or, the base station re-determines a third threshold met by both the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A and the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X.
- both of the thresholds can ensure that the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X meets a transmission code rate requirement, and therefore, the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A meets the transmission code rate requirement even better.
- the number of blind detection times may be assigned, based on a predetermined rule, to the aggregation levels determined according to the foregoing thresholds.
- the base station may determine a first threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A, and determine a second threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X.
- determining different thresholds for different transmission formats determined aggregation levels that can be supported by EPDDCHs to be detected may be different.
- the embodiment of the present invention it is also possible that a part of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to one or some aggregation levels among the aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected do not support the transmission of a certain EPDCCH which is to be detected and with the DCI transmission format, and the rest support the transmission of the EPDCCH with the DCI transmission format.
- the number of candidates corresponding to this part of EPDCCH candidates may also be reassigned.
- the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the reassignment principle, which may be any one of or a combination of multiple principles mentioned in the embodiments of the present invention, and may also be a new principle.
- the present invention does not limit the object of the reassignment either; the object may or may not include the foregoing one or some aggregation levels.
- N 5, and the N aggregation levels are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ . It is assumed that the aggregation level 1 has been assigned with 10 EPDCCH candidates. For failing to meet the code rate requirement, the aggregation level 1 cannot be used for transmitting EPDCCHs with the DCI format series 2X, and all other aggregation levels meet the code rate requirement.
- the base station may assign 10 EPDCCH candidates to the 4 remaining aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- N 4, N aggregation levels are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ , and all the aggregation levels meet the code rate requirement. It is assumed that the aggregation level 2 has been assigned with 4 EPDCCH candidates, but 2 EPDCCH candidates in the aggregation level 2 do not meet the code rate requirement.
- the base station may assign 2 EPDCCH candidates to the 3 remaining aggregation levels ⁇ 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- N 5, and N aggregation levels are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ . It is assumed that the aggregation level 1 and the aggregation level 2 each correspond to 10 EPDCCH candidates. The aggregation level 1 does not meet the code rate requirement, and 5 EPDCCH candidates in the aggregation level 2 do not meet the code rate requirement.
- the base station may assign 15 EPDCCH candidates to the 4 remaining aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- an aggregation level corresponding to the P1 EPDCCH candidates is used as (N-M) aggregation level.
- N 5
- N aggregation levels are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the aggregation level 1 does not meet the code rate requirement
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the method in FIG. 2 is executed by a base station.
- the embodiment in FIG. 2 is a more specific implementation manner of the embodiment in FIG. 1 , and therefore, detailed descriptions are properly omitted herein.
- 201 Determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the method in FIG. 3 is executed by a UE.
- the embodiment in FIG. 3 is corresponding to the embodiment in FIG. 1 .
- the difference between the executor, the base station, in FIG. 1 and the executor, the UE, in FIG. 3 is that the assigned objects are different.
- the base station assigns the EPDCCH candidates, and the UE assigns the number of blind detection times; the assignment manners may be the same or corresponding to each other, and therefore, detailed descriptions are omitted herein.
- 301 Determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected
- j is a positive integer
- a value of j ranges from 1 to M
- ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , M ⁇ N
- the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- the determining the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ may include: determining (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determining the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assigning P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the assigning P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assigning P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: evenly assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the assigning P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time may include: cyclically assigning one time of blind detection to each aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assigning one time of blind detection to each aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the determining a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ may include: determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected may include: determining at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determining ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- the total number of aggregation levels that can be supported by the UE is K, and the total number of blind detection times is 32 (the total number of blind detection times may be 48 in the case of UL MIMO).
- the total number of blind detection times is assigned to the K aggregation levels based on a certain predetermined rule, to obtain an assignment result 1 of the K aggregation levels.
- the number of aggregation levels that actually can be supported by the UE declines from K to T, where T ⁇ K
- the number of blind detection times corresponding to the (K-T) aggregation levels that are not supported are assigned to the T aggregation levels, to obtain an assignment result 2 of the T aggregation levels.
- the assignment of the number of blind detection times for the aggregation levels in S1 is based on the assignment of the number of blind detection times for the aggregation levels in S2.
- the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation level 1 in S2 is assigned to each aggregation level in the set S1 based on a certain preset rule.
- This rule may be one or more rules in the embodiment of the present invention.
- the assignment of the number of blind detection times corresponding to all other cases in the right area of Table 1 may be used as blind detection assignment 1, and the assignment of the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in the left area of Table 1 is obtained from the blind detection assignment 1 of the aggregation levels ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in the right area.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The method in FIG. 4 is executed by an UE.
- 401 Determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates.
- the base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station assigns the a EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level 1 to the aggregation levels 2, 4, 8, and 16 according to proportions of b/(b+c+d+e), c/(b+c+d+e), d/(b+c+d+e), and e/(b+c+d+e):
- the base station assigns one of (a-b/(b+c+d+e)-c/(b+c+d+e)-d/(b+c+d+e)-e/(b+c+d+e)) remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- a more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk, where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are M L1 , M L2 , ..., M Lk , respectively.
- the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number M Li of blind detection times corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels that meet the condition.
- R M Li ⁇ ⁇ t ⁇ i M Lt ' ⁇ M Lt
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition from a high aggregation level to a low aggregation level.
- the M Li in the foregoing formula (6) is corresponding to the total number of candidates of all the aggregation levels that do not meet the condition.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates.
- the base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station assigns the a EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level 1 to the aggregation level 2.
- the aggregation level 2 to which the a EPDCCH candidates are assigned is merely an aggregation level selected from the second set, and may also be any aggregation level in the second set.
- a more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk, where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are M L1 , M L2 , ..., M Lk , respectively. It is assumed that the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number of blind detection times M Li corresponding to this aggregation level to a certain aggregation level among the other aggregation levels that meet the condition.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates.
- the base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station assigns (5b/4-b), (5c/4-c), (5d/4-d), and (5e/4-e) to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a ratio 5/4 of the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected:
- the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order or an ascending order of the aggregation levels.
- the assignment stops.
- the base station assigns one of ( a - b'-c' - d'-e ') remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- a more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk (the total number of aggregation levels is k), where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are M L1 , M L2 , ..., M Lk , respectively.
- the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number M Li of blind detection times corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels (the total number of aggregation levels is m) that meet the condition.
- R M Li ⁇ ⁇ t ⁇ i M Lt ' ⁇ M Lt
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition starting from a low aggregation level or a high aggregation level.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates
- the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates.
- the base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the base station assigns one of ( a - ⁇ a / m ⁇ - ⁇ a / m ⁇ - ⁇ a / m ⁇ - ⁇ a / m ⁇ - ⁇ a / m ⁇ ) remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the method for assigning remaining EPDCCH candidates, and the remaining EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order or an ascending order, or based on a certain predetermined sequence.
- a more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk (the total number of aggregation levels is k), where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are M L1 , M L2 , ..., M Lk , respectively.
- the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; then a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number of blind detection times M Li corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels (the total number of aggregation levels is m) that meet the condition.
- R M Li ⁇ ⁇ t ⁇ i M Lt ' ⁇ M Lt
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition starting from a low aggregation level or a high aggregation level.
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the embodiment in FIG. 9 is corresponding to the embodiment in FIG. 5 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment in FIG. 5 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment in FIG. 9 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again.
- a UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE assigns the a times of blind detection corresponding to the aggregation level 1 to the aggregation levels 2, 4, 8, and 16 according to proportions of b/(b+c+d+e), c/(b+c+d+e), d/(b+c+d+e), and e/(b+c+d+e).
- the UE assigns one of (a-b/(b+c+d+e)-c/(b+c+d+e)-d/(b+c+d+e)-e/(b+c+d+e)) remaining times of blind detection to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the embodiment in FIG. 10 is corresponding to the embodiment in FIG. 6 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment in FIG. 6 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment in FIG. 10 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again.
- a UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE assigns the number a of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation level 1 to the aggregation level 8.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the embodiment in FIG. 11 is corresponding to the embodiment in FIG. 7 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment in FIG. 7 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment in FIG. 11 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again.
- a UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE assigns 5b/4, 5c/4, 5d/4, and 5e/4 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a ratio 5/4 of the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the UE assigns one of remaining (a-5b/4-5c/4-5d/4-5e/4) times of blind detection to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- the embodiment in FIG. 12 is corresponding to the embodiment in FIG. 8 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment in FIG. 8 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment in FIG. 12 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again.
- a UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are ⁇ a, b, c, d, e ⁇ .
- the UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ .
- the UE evenly assigns a to the set ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ , where each aggregation level obtains a/4 times of blind detection.
- the UE assigns one of remaining (a-5b/4-5c/4-5d/4-5e/4) times of blind detection to the aggregation levels ⁇ 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station 1300 in FIG. 13 includes a first determining unit 1301 and a second determining unit 1302.
- the base station in FIG. 13 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base station in FIG. 1 , FIG. 2 , and FIG. 5 to FIG. 8 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again.
- the first determining unit 1301 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the second determining unit 1302 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , where ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , M ⁇ N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assign P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign PI EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the second determining unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- a 1400 in FIG. 14 includes a first determining unit 1401 and a second determining unit 1402.
- the UE in FIG. 14 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base stations in FIG. 3 , FIG. 4 , and FIG. 9 to FIG. 12 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again.
- the first determining unit 1401 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the second determining unit 1402 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , where ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , M ⁇ N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determine the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assign P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign PI times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the second determining unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- FIG. 15 is a block diagram of a base station according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- a base station 1500 includes a processor 1501 and a memory 1502.
- the base station in FIG. 15 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base station in FIG. 1 , FIG. 2 , and FIG. 5 to FIG. 8 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again.
- the processor 1501 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the memory 1502 is configured to store ⁇ L 1i ⁇ and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the processor 1501 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , where ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L i ⁇ , M ⁇ N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the memory 1502 is configured to store ⁇ L 2j ⁇ and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to get ⁇ L 1i ⁇ from the processor 1502, determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assign P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to get ⁇ L 2j ⁇ from the processor 1502, assign P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the processor 1501 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to another embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 1600 includes a processor 1601 and a memory 1602 The UE in FIG. 16 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base stations in FIG. 3 , FIG. 4 , and FIG. 9 to FIG. 12 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again.
- the processor 1601 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , where ⁇ L 1i ⁇ is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- the memory 1602 is configured to store ⁇ L 1i ⁇ and the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the processor 1601 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level ⁇ L 2j ⁇ , where ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is a subset of ⁇ L 1i ⁇ , M ⁇ N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L 2j in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the memory 1602 is configured to store ⁇ L 2j ⁇ and the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to get ⁇ L 1i ⁇ from the processor, determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ are removed from ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; determine the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ ; and assign P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to get ⁇ L 2j ⁇ from the processor, assign P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a first time; and assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in a second time, where P1+P2 ⁇ P.
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in ⁇ L 1i ⁇ .
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in ⁇ L 2j ⁇ .
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- the processor 1601 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine ⁇ L 2j ⁇ according to the at least one threshold.
- the total number of candidates is assigned among the aggregation levels.
- the number of enhanced control channel elements ECCEs is different. For example, when each physical resource block pair corresponds to physical resource units of 4 ECCEs, the number of enhanced control channel elements ECCEs in 2 physical resource block pairs is 8, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ that can be supported by the 2 physical resource block pairs are ⁇ 8, 4, 2, 1, 0 ⁇ , respectively; the total number of enhanced control channel elements in 4 physical resource block pairs is 16, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ that can be supported by the 4 physical resource block pairs are ⁇ 16, 8, 4, 2, 1 ⁇ , respectively.
- the total number of enhanced control channel elements in 8 physical resource block pairs is 32, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels ⁇ 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 ⁇ that can be supported by the 8 physical resource block pairs are ⁇ 32, 16, 8, 4, 2 ⁇ , respectively.
- the disclosed system, apparatus, and method may be implemented in other manners.
- the described apparatus embodiments are merely exemplary.
- the unit division is merely logical function division and may be other division in actual implementation.
- a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not performed.
- the displayed or discussed mutual couplings or direct couplings or communication connections may be implemented through some interfaces.
- the indirect couplings or communication connections between the apparatuses or units may be implemented in electronic, mechanical, or other forms.
- the units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and the parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one position, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. A part of or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the objectives of the solutions of the embodiments.
- the functions When the functions are implemented in a form of a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, the functions may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on such an understanding, the technical solutions of the present invention essentially, or the part contributing to the prior art, or a part of the technical solutions may be implemented in a form of a software product.
- the computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for instructing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device or the like) to perform all or a part of the steps of the methods described in the embodiments of the present invention.
- the foregoing storage medium includes: any mediums capable of storing program code, such as a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disc.
- program code such as a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disc.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
Description
- Embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of wireless communications, and in particular, to a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates and the number of blind detection times, a base station, and a user equipment.
- A long term evolution (Long Term Evolution, LTE) Rel-8/9/10 communications system employs a dynamic scheduling technology to improve system performance, that is, an evolved NodeB (evolved NodeB, eNB) schedules and allocates resources according to a channel state of each user equipment (User Equipment, UE), so that each scheduled user performs communication on an optimal channel of the user. In downlink transmission, the eNB sends a physical downlink shared channel (Physical Downlink Shared Channel, PDSCH) and a physical downlink control channel (Physical Downlink Control Channel, PDCCH) corresponding to the PDSCH to each scheduled UE according to a result of the dynamic scheduling, where the PDSCH bears data that the eNB sends to the UE, and accordingly, the PDCCH is mainly used for indicating a transmission format or scheduling information of the PDSCH, for example, resource allocation, a transport block size, a modulation and coding scheme a transmission rank, precoding matrix information, and so on.
- In one subframe, all PDCCHs used for uplink and downlink scheduling are multiplexed on N control channel elements (Control Channel Element, CCE) in a PDCCH region, where N is greater than 1, and the control channel elements are numbered from 0. Each PDCCH is an aggregation of L consecutive CCEs, where L is one of 1, 2, 4, or 8, that is, the PDCCH has four aggregation levels in total. The number of CCEs aggregated in each PDCCH is determined by the size of an information block size in the PDCCH and a channel state of a UE corresponding to the PDCCH. Before the PDCCH is sent, the N CCEs multiplexed in the PDCCH region are interleaved, and then the interleaved CCEs are mapped to a reserved RE in the PDCCH region in sequence and sent.
- At a receiving end, the UE needs to perform blind detection on the N CCEs to obtain a PDCCH corresponding to the UE. At each CCE aggregation level, PDCCH candidates are limited. The less the candidate PDCCHs are, the less the number of blind detection times of the UE is. For example, in the prior art, when the CCE aggregation level L is equal to 8, the number of PDCCH candidates is 2, that is, only CCE 0 to CCE 7 and CCE 8 to CCE 15 need to be detected. Although such CCE assignment principle can reduce the number of blind detection times, the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level is still in positive correlation with the number N of CCEs in the PDCCH region, that is, the number of blind detection times increases as the N increases. To further reduce the complexity of blind detection, at each CCE aggregation level, the maximum number of times of blind detection that the UE needs to perform is defined, which is called a search space. Search spaces are classified into a common search space and a UE-specific search space, and the difference between the two lies in that a location of a start CCE in the common search space is fixed while a start CCE in the UE-specific search space is determined by an identifier of the UE and a subframe number of a subframe where the PDCCH is located. The common search space and the UE-specific search space may overlap each other.
- An existing PDCCH is enhanced in LTE Rel-11, that is, a part of resources in a PDSCH region are divided to transmit an enhanced physical downlink control channel (Enhanced Physical Downlink Control Channel, EPDCCH), so that resources assigned to the control channel are more flexible, and are no longer limited by three orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, OFDM) symbols. The EPDCCH may use a transmission manner based on a demodulation reference signal (Demodulation Reference Signal, DMRS) to implement spatial reuse, so as to improve transmission efficiency of the control channel. For example, control channels of UEs serving different radio remote units (Radio Remote Unit, RRU) may occupy the same time frequency resource as long as being desirably isolated in space, and in this way, the capacity of the PDCCH or the number of UEs scheduled at the same time is improved.
- Main conclusions passed on the the 3rd generation partnership (The 3rd Generation Partnership, 3GPP) radio access network (Radio Access Network, RAN) 1 70bis standard conference are as follows: a UE performs blind detection in K EPDCCH sets, each EPDCCH set in the K EPDCCH sets is formed by M physical resource block pairs, and the value of M is 2, 4, or 8. In a case of a normal subframe (normal cyclic prefix) or special subframe (normal cyclic prefix)
ratio 3, 4, or 8, when the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair is less than a predetermined threshold, aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH are 2, 4, 8 or 16; and in other cases, aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH are 1, 2, 4, 8, or 16. - The total number of blind detection times of the UE is 32 (in a special case such as multiple-input multiple-output (Multiple-Input Multiple-Output, MIMO), the total number of blind detection times of the UE is 48). First, the number of blind detection times is assigned to the aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH, and then is assigned among EPDCCH sets corresponding to each aggregation level.
- Transmission formats that can be supported by the EPDCCH mainly include downlink control information (Downlink Control Information, DCI) format series 1X, including 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, and the like; DCI format series 2X, including 2, 2A, 2B, 2C, and the like; and DCI formats 0, 4, and the like used for indicating a data transmission format of an uplink traffic channel. A payload of the DCI format series 2X is generally much greater than that of the DCI format series 1X.
- In the current standard, aggregation levels that can be supported by an EPDCCH are determined by the comparison between the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair in a search space where the EPDCCH is located and a predetermined threshold. When the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair is greater than the predetermined threshold, a transmission code rate of the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A is not greater than 0.8, but this conclusion is not applicable to an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X. For example, if it is determined according to the predetermined threshold that aggregation levels that can be supported by the EPDCCH are 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16, when the EPDCCH is transmitted in the DCI format 1A and at the
lowest aggregation level 1, the transmission code rate of the EPDCCH is not greater than 0.8. However, when the EPDCCH is transmitted in the DCI format series 2X and at thelowest aggregation level 1, it cannot be ensured that the transmission code rate thereof is within a certain threshold, and the transmission code rate thereof is even possibly greater than 1. - In one subframe, when aggregation levels that can be supported by an EPDCCH is determined according to the foregoing predetermined threshold, the determined lowest aggregation level may not support data transmission in the DCI format series 2X. In this case, the UE skips blind detection for the DCI format series 2X at the lowest aggregation level, and only detects EPDCCH candidates transmitted in the DCI format series 2X at other aggregation levels. With further consideration, in some overhead combinations, sizes of the control channel elements are not balanced, and sizes of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to a certain aggregation level are not balanced either, which may lead to a phenomenon that at the same aggregation level, some EPDCCH candidates support transmission in the DCI format series 2X, while some EPDCCH candidates do not support transmission in the DCI format series 2X. In this case, in the prior art, the UE also skips the EPDCCH candidates that do not support the transmission in the DCI format series 2X, which decreases the utilization of the number of EPDCCH candidates and the number of blind detection times.
- Document 3GPP R1-124555 (Panasonic, "EPDCCH search space and aggregation levels") discloses a method for how to split the blind decoding trials among EPDCCH sets and how to dertermin EPDCCH candidates within each EPDCCH set.
- Embodiments of the present invention provide a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates and the number of blind detection times, a base station, and a user equipment, which improve the utilization of EPDCCH candidates and the number of blind detection times.
- The present invention is defined in the independent claims. Preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
- In the embodiments of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to an aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates. Moreover, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- To describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention more clearly, the following briefly introduces the accompanying drawings required for describing the embodiments of the present invention. Apparently, the accompanying drawings in the following description show merely some embodiments of the present invention, and a person of ordinary skill in the art may still derive other drawings from these accompanying drawings without creative efforts.
-
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention; -
FIG. 15 is a block diagram of a base station according to another embodiment of the present invention; and -
FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to another embodiment of the present invention. - The invention is defined and limited only by the scope of appended claims 1-15. In what follows, all references to embodiments not falling within the scope of appended claims are to be interpreted as examples useful for understanding the invention. It should be understood that the technical solutions of the present invention may be applied to various communication systems, for example, a global system of mobile communication (Global System of Mobile communication, GSM), a code division multiple access (Code Division Multiple Access, CDMA) system, a wideband code division multiple access (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access, WCDMA) system, a general packet radio service (General Packet Radio Service, GPRS), an LTE system, an advanced long term evolution (Advanced long term evolution, LTE-A) system, a universal mobile telecommunication system (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System, UMTS), and so on.
- It should also be understood that, in the embodiments of the present invention, a user equipment (User Equipment, UE) includes but is not limited to a mobile station (Mobile Station, MS), a mobile terminal (Mobile Terminal), a mobile telephone (Mobile Telephone), a handset (handset), portable equipment (portable equipment), and the like, and the user equipment may communicate with one or more core networks through a radio access network (Radio Access Network, RAN). For example, the user equipment may be a mobile telephone (or called a "cellular" phone), a computer with a wireless communication function, and the user equipment may also be a portable mobile apparatus, a pocket-sized mobile apparatus, a handheld mobile apparatus, a computer built-in mobile apparatus, or a vehicle-mounted mobile apparatus.
-
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method inFIG. 1 is executed by a base station, which, for example, may be an eNB in the LTE technology, and may also be a radio network controller (Radio Network Controller, RNC) in the WCDMA technology. - 101: Determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- 102: Determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L1i}.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present invention, the number of EPDCCH candidates that the base station needs to assign may be the same as the number of blind detection times of a UE. For example, when the UE supports 32 times of blind detection, the base station may assign 32 EPDCCH candidates to the UE; when the UE employs an uplink MIMO technology, the number of blind detection times that can be supported by the UE is 48, and the base station may assign 48 EPDCCH candidates to the UE. It should be understood that, the number of EPDCCH candidates assigned by the base station may also be different from the number of blind detection times supported by the UE, which is not limited in the embodiment of the present invention.
- It should be noted that, the "EPDCCH" in the foregoing expression "N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH" is a generalized concept, and may not refer in particular to a certain EPDCCH; moreover, the base station may determine the N aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH before actually sending the EPDCCH; the EPDCCH to be detected may be a specific EPDCCH in a certain subframe.
- Optionally, as an embodiment, step 102 may include: determining (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determining the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. For example, {L1i} is {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}, corresponding to {10, 10, 5, 5, 2} EPDCCH candidates, respectively, and N=5. {L2j} is {2, 4, 8, 16}, M=4. (N-M) aggregation level refers to the
aggregation level 1. Then, it is determined that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to theaggregation level 1 in the first set is 10, that is to say, P=10, and 10 EPDCCH candidates are assigned to {2, 4, 8, 16} based on a certain rule. - It should be noted that, the present invention does not limit the specific assignment manner for assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}; the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned evenly, or assigned proportionally, or assigned randomly. In addition, the present invention does not limit the assignment sequence either; the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order of the aggregation levels, or assigned according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; the EPDCCH candidates may be completely assigned in one time, or assigned in several times.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} may include: assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assigning P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P. It should be understood that, the present invention does not limit the selection of the P1 and P2; P1 and P2 may be determined in advance; or, an assignment rule may be determined in advance, and P2 EPDCCH candidates remain after the assignment based on the rule, while P1 is not determined in advance but is obtained after the assignment based on the rule.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: evenly assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}.
- For example, if {L2j} is {2, 4, 8, 16}, and P=10, 10 EPDCCH candidates are evenly assigned to
aggregation levels - Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in {L2j}.
- It should be noted that, the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the assignment manner of P2; the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned based on a certain rule, or assigned randomly; a part of the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned first, and then the rest are assigned; the P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned completely, or some of the P2 EPDCCH candidates may remain.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time may include: cyclically assigning one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assigning one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- It should be understood that, when P2 is greater than the number of aggregation levels in {L2j}, after one EPDCCH candidate is assigned to each aggregation level in {L2j} based on the foregoing rule, remaining EPDCCH candidates among P2 EPDCCH candidates may be assigned based on the same rule, that is, the assignment is performed cyclically in sequence.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the determining a second aggregation level set {L2j} may include: determining {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the determining {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected may include: determining at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determining {L2j} according to the at least one threshold.
- For example, the base station may determine a first threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A, and the first threshold may also be used for an EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X.
- Optionally, the base station may also determine a second threshold for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X, and the second threshold may also be used for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A; or, the base station re-determines a third threshold met by both the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A and the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X. It should be understood that, when the second threshold or the third threshold is used, both of the thresholds can ensure that the EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X meets a transmission code rate requirement, and therefore, the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format 1A meets the transmission code rate requirement even better. In this case, the number of blind detection times may be assigned, based on a predetermined rule, to the aggregation levels determined according to the foregoing thresholds.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the base station may determine a first threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format 1A, and determine a second threshold for an EPDCCH transmitted in the DCI format series 2X. Through determining different thresholds for different transmission formats, determined aggregation levels that can be supported by EPDDCHs to be detected may be different.
- It should be noted that, in the embodiment of the present invention, it is also possible that a part of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to one or some aggregation levels among the aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected do not support the transmission of a certain EPDCCH which is to be detected and with the DCI transmission format, and the rest support the transmission of the EPDCCH with the DCI transmission format. In this case, the number of candidates corresponding to this part of EPDCCH candidates may also be reassigned. The embodiment of the present invention does not limit the reassignment principle, which may be any one of or a combination of multiple principles mentioned in the embodiments of the present invention, and may also be a new principle. The present invention does not limit the object of the reassignment either; the object may or may not include the foregoing one or some aggregation levels.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, N=5, and the N aggregation levels are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}. It is assumed that the
aggregation level 1 has been assigned with 10 EPDCCH candidates. For failing to meet the code rate requirement, theaggregation level 1 cannot be used for transmitting EPDCCHs with the DCI format series 2X, and all other aggregation levels meet the code rate requirement. In this case, N-M=1, the (N-M) aggregation level is {1}, P=10, M=4, and the M aggregation levels are {2, 4, 8, 16}. The base station may assign 10 EPDCCH candidates to the 4 remaining aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, N=4, N aggregation levels are {2, 4, 8, 16}, and all the aggregation levels meet the code rate requirement. It is assumed that the
aggregation level 2 has been assigned with 4 EPDCCH candidates, but 2 EPDCCH candidates in theaggregation level 2 do not meet the code rate requirement. In this case, (N-M) may be equal to 1, the (N-M) aggregation level is {2}, P=2, M=3, and the M aggregation levels are {4, 8, 16}. The base station may assign 2 EPDCCH candidates to the 3 remaining aggregation levels {4, 8, 16}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, N=5, and N aggregation levels are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}. It is assumed that the
aggregation level 1 and theaggregation level 2 each correspond to 10 EPDCCH candidates. Theaggregation level 1 does not meet the code rate requirement, and 5 EPDCCH candidates in theaggregation level 2 do not meet the code rate requirement. In this case, N-M=1, the (N-M) aggregation level is {1}, P=15, M=4, and the M aggregation levels are {2, 4, 8, 16}. The base station may assign 15 EPDCCH candidates to the 4 remaining aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16}. - Optionally, in optional step 104, an aggregation level corresponding to the P1 EPDCCH candidates is used as (N-M) aggregation level. For example, N=5, and N aggregation levels are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}. In this case, the
aggregation level 1 does not meet the code rate requirement, and 2 EPDCCH candidates in theaggregation level 2 do not meet the code rate requirement; then, it is determined that N-M=2, and the (N-M) aggregation levels are {1, 2}. -
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention. The method inFIG. 2 is executed by a base station. The embodiment inFIG. 2 is a more specific implementation manner of the embodiment inFIG. 1 , and therefore, detailed descriptions are properly omitted herein. - 201: Determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- 202: Determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}.
- Determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1}.
- 204: Determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1}.
- 205: Assign P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time.
- 206: Assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
-
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to an embodiment of the present invention. The method inFIG. 3 is executed by a UE. The embodiment inFIG. 3 is corresponding to the embodiment inFIG. 1 . The difference between the executor, the base station, inFIG. 1 and the executor, the UE, inFIG. 3 is that the assigned objects are different. The base station assigns the EPDCCH candidates, and the UE assigns the number of blind detection times; the assignment manners may be the same or corresponding to each other, and therefore, detailed descriptions are omitted herein. - 301: Determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- 302: Determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L1i}.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- Optionally, as an embodiment, the determining the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j} may include: determining (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determining the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assigning P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assigning P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: evenly assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time may include: cyclically assigning one time of blind detection to each aggregation level in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assigning one time of blind detection to each aggregation level in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the assigning P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time may include: assigning P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in {L2j}.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the determining a second aggregation level set {L2j} may include: determining {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the determining {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected may include: determining at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determining {L2j} according to the at least one threshold.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, it is assumed that the total number of aggregation levels that can be supported by the UE is K, and the total number of blind detection times is 32 (the total number of blind detection times may be 48 in the case of UL MIMO). The total number of blind detection times is assigned to the K aggregation levels based on a certain predetermined rule, to obtain an
assignment result 1 of the K aggregation levels. When the number of aggregation levels that actually can be supported by the UE declines from K to T, where T≤K, the number of blind detection times corresponding to the (K-T) aggregation levels that are not supported are assigned to the T aggregation levels, to obtain anassignment result 2 of the T aggregation levels. - For example, for a normal subframe and a normal cyclic prefix, or a
special subframe configuration 3, 4, or 8, when the number of valid resource units in each physical resource block pair is less than 104, a set of aggregation levels that can be supported by the UE is S1={2, 4, 8, 16}; otherwise, a set of aggregation levels that can be supported is S2={1, 2, 4, 8, 16}. In this case, the assignment of the number of blind detection times for the aggregation levels in S1 is based on the assignment of the number of blind detection times for the aggregation levels in S2. That is, the number of blind detection times corresponding to theaggregation level 1 in S2 is assigned to each aggregation level in the set S1 based on a certain preset rule. This rule may be one or more rules in the embodiment of the present invention. Based on this method, the assignment of the number of blind detection times corresponding to all other cases in the right area of Table 1 may be used asblind detection assignment 1, and the assignment of the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in the left area of Table 1 is obtained from theblind detection assignment 1 of the aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} in the right area.Table 1 ND NL N1 N2 Normal subframes or special subframes 3, 4, 8 (normal CP) All other cases AL=2 AL=4 AL=8 AL=16 AL=1 AL=2 AL=4 AL=8 AL=16 1 0 8 0 7 3 3 3 4 6 2 2 2 4 0 7 4 3 2 4 6 3 2 1 2 0 6 4 3 2 8 4 2 1 0 -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The method inFIG. 4 is executed by an UE. - 401: Determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N.
- 402: Determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}.
- 403: Determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}.
- 404: Determine the total number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}.
- 405: Assign P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time.
- 406: Assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
-
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention. - 501: A base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the first aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of first aggregation levels is N=5. - 502: The base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- That is, the
aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates, the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates, and the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates. - 503: The base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the second aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of second aggregation levels is M=4. - 504: The base station assigns the a EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the
aggregation level 1 to theaggregation levels - that is, the
aggregation level 2 is assigned with: - the aggregation level 4 is assigned with:
- the
aggregation level 8 is assigned with: - the aggregation level 16 is assigned with:
- It should be noted that, if a decimal occurs during the assignment based on the foregoing method, an integer part is used as the assigned number of times. For example, if e'=2.5, 2 is used as the assigned number of times.
- 505: The base station assigns one of (a-b/(b+c+d+e)-c/(b+c+d+e)-d/(b+c+d+e)-e/(b+c+d+e)) remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
-
- Assuming that R=3, one EPDCCH candidate is assigned to the
aggregation levels 16, 8, and 4 in sequence, and a final assignment result of the a EPDCCH candidates is as follows:
A more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk, where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are ML1, ML2, ..., MLk, respectively. It is assumed that the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number MLi of blind detection times corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels that meet the condition. The number of blind detection times of the jth aggregation level after the first assignment is: -
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition from a high aggregation level to a low aggregation level.
- When the number of aggregation levels that do not meet the condition is greater than 1, the MLi in the foregoing formula (6) is corresponding to the total number of candidates of all the aggregation levels that do not meet the condition.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
-
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention. - 601: A base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the first aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of first aggregation levels is N=5. - 602: The base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- That is, the
aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates, the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates, and the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates. - 603: The base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the second aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of second aggregation levels is M=4. - 604: The base station assigns the a EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the
aggregation level 1 to theaggregation level 2. - It should be understood that, the
aggregation level 2 to which the a EPDCCH candidates are assigned is merely an aggregation level selected from the second set, and may also be any aggregation level in the second set. - A more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk, where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are ML1, ML2, ..., MLk, respectively. It is assumed that the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number of blind detection times MLi corresponding to this aggregation level to a certain aggregation level among the other aggregation levels that meet the condition.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
-
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention. - 701: A base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the first aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of first aggregation levels is N=5. - 702: The base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- That is, the
aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates, the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates, and the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates. - 703: The base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the second aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of second aggregation levels is M=4. - 704: The base station assigns (5b/4-b), (5c/4-c), (5d/4-d), and (5e/4-e) to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a ratio 5/4 of the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected:
- that is, the
aggregation level 2 is assigned with: - the aggregation level 4 is assigned with:
- the
aggregation level 8 is assigned with: - the aggregation level 16 is assigned with:
- It should be noted that, during an actual assignment process, the EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order or an ascending order of the aggregation levels. When the a EPDCCH candidates are completely assigned at a certain aggregation level, the assignment stops.
- 705: The base station assigns one of (a-b'-c'-d'-e') remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
-
- A more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk (the total number of aggregation levels is k), where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are ML1, ML2, ..., MLk, respectively. It is assumed that the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number MLi of blind detection times corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels (the total number of aggregation levels is m) that meet the condition. The number of blind detection times of the jth aggregation level after the first assignment is:
-
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition starting from a low aggregation level or a high aggregation level.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
-
FIG. 8 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of control channel candidates according to another embodiment of the present invention. - 801: A base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the first aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of first aggregation levels is N=5. - 802: The base station determines that the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- That is, the
aggregation level 1 is assigned with a EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 2 is assigned with b EPDCCH candidates, the aggregation level 4 is assigned with c EPDCCH candidates, theaggregation level 8 is assigned with d EPDCCH candidates, and the aggregation level 16 is assigned with e EPDCCH candidates. - 803: The base station determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- {2, 4, 8, 16} are corresponding to the second aggregation levels in the method in
FIG. 1 , and the number of second aggregation levels is M=4. - 804: The base station evenly assigns a to the set {2, 4, 8, 16}, where each aggregation level obtains a/m EPDCCH candidates, and m=4 herein.
- It should be noted that, when a/m has a decimal part, only an integer part is used; for example, if a/m=4.3, 4 is used.
- 805: The base station assigns one of (a-└a/m┘-└a/m┘-└a/m┘-└a/m┘) remaining EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- It should be noted that, the embodiment of the present invention does not limit the method for assigning remaining EPDCCH candidates, and the remaining EPDCCH candidates may be assigned according to a descending order or an ascending order, or based on a certain predetermined sequence.
- A more generalized assignment criterion may be expressed as follows: it is assumed that aggregation levels that can be supported by an enhanced control channel determined according to a certain threshold are L1, L2, ..., Lk (the total number of aggregation levels is k), where the numbers of candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels are ML1, ML2, ..., MLk, respectively. It is assumed that the aggregation level Li cannot meet a code rate requirement of an enhanced control channel with a certain DCI format; then a user terminal skips the detection of this aggregation level, and at the same time assigns the number of blind detection times MLi corresponding to this aggregation level to other aggregation levels (the total number of aggregation levels is m) that meet the condition. The number of blind detection times of the jth aggregation level after the first assignment is:
-
- R is evenly assigned to the other aggregation levels that meet the condition starting from a low aggregation level or a high aggregation level.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
-
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment inFIG. 9 is corresponding to the embodiment inFIG. 5 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment inFIG. 5 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment inFIG. 9 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again. - 901: A UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 902: The UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- 903: The UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 904: The UE assigns the a times of blind detection corresponding to the
aggregation level 1 to theaggregation levels - 905: The UE assigns one of (a-b/(b+c+d+e)-c/(b+c+d+e)-d/(b+c+d+e)-e/(b+c+d+e)) remaining times of blind detection to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
-
FIG. 10 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment inFIG. 10 is corresponding to the embodiment inFIG. 6 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment inFIG. 6 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment inFIG. 10 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again. - 1001: A UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1002: The UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- 1003: The UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1004: The UE assigns the number a of blind detection times corresponding to the
aggregation level 1 to theaggregation level 8. - In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
-
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment inFIG. 11 is corresponding to the embodiment inFIG. 7 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment inFIG. 7 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment inFIG. 11 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again. - 1101: A UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1102: The UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- 1103: The UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1104: The UE assigns 5b/4, 5c/4, 5d/4, and 5e/4 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a ratio 5/4 of the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to the number of aggregation levels supported by the EPDCCH to be detected.
- 1105: The UE assigns one of remaining (a-5b/4-5c/4-5d/4-5e/4) times of blind detection to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
-
FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a method for assigning the number of blind detection times according to another embodiment of the present invention. The embodiment inFIG. 12 is corresponding to the embodiment inFIG. 8 ; the assignment manner of the number of EPDCCH candidates in the embodiment inFIG. 8 and the assignment manner of the number of blind detection times in the embodiment inFIG. 12 are the same or corresponding to each other. To avoid repetition, the assignment manner is not described in detail again. - 1201: A UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH are {1, 2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1202: The UE determines that the number of blind detection times corresponding to the five aggregation levels are {a, b, c, d, e}.
- 1203: The UE determines that aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected are {2, 4, 8, 16}.
- 1204: The UE evenly assigns a to the set {2, 4, 8, 16}, where each aggregation level obtains a/4 times of blind detection.
- 1205: The UE assigns one of remaining (a-5b/4-5c/4-5d/4-5e/4) times of blind detection to the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
-
FIG. 13 is a block diagram of a base station according to an embodiment of the present invention. Abase station 1300 inFIG. 13 includes a first determiningunit 1301 and a second determiningunit 1302. The base station inFIG. 13 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base station inFIG. 1 ,FIG. 2 , andFIG. 5 toFIG. 8 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again. - The first determining
unit 1301 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N. - The second determining
unit 1302 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L1i}. - In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assign P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign PI EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1302 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine {L2j} according to the at least one threshold. -
FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to an embodiment of the present invention. A 1400 inFIG. 14 includes a first determiningunit 1401 and a second determiningunit 1402. The UE inFIG. 14 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base stations inFIG. 3 ,FIG. 4 , andFIG. 9 toFIG. 12 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again. - The first determining
unit 1401 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N. - The second determining
unit 1402 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L1i}. - In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determine the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assign P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign PI times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the second determining
unit 1402 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine {L2j} according to the at least one threshold. -
FIG. 15 is a block diagram of a base station according to another embodiment of the present invention. Abase station 1500 includes aprocessor 1501 and amemory 1502. The base station inFIG. 15 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base station inFIG. 1 ,FIG. 2 , andFIG. 5 toFIG. 8 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again. - The
processor 1501 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N. Thememory 1502 is configured to store {L1i} and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels in {L1i}. - The
processor 1501 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {Li}, M≤N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in {L1i}. Thememory 1502 is configured to store {L2j} and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - In the embodiment of the present invention, the base station reassigns the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the aggregation level not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the EPDCCH candidates.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to get {L1i} from theprocessor 1502, determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assign P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to get {L2j} from theprocessor 1502, assign P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to determine {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1501 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine {L2j} according to the at least one threshold. -
FIG. 16 is a block diagram of a user equipment according to another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 1600 includes aprocessor 1601 and amemory 1602 The UE inFIG. 16 is capable of executing the steps performed by the base stations inFIG. 3 ,FIG. 4 , andFIG. 9 toFIG. 12 . To avoid repetition, the steps are not described in detail again. - The
processor 1601 is configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L1i}, where {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N. Thememory 1602 is configured to store {L1i} and the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels in {L1i}. - The
processor 1601 is configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the aggregation level {L2j}, where {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, {L2j} is a subset of {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in {L1i}. Thememory 1602 is configured to store {L2j} and the number of blind detection times corresponding to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - In the embodiment of the present invention, the UE reassigns the number of blind detection times corresponding to an aggregation level that is not supported by the EPDCCH to be detected, thereby improving the utilization of the blind detection times.
- Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to get {L1i} from the processor, determine (N-M) remaining aggregation level after the aggregation levels in {L2j} are removed from {L1i}; determine the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the (N-M) aggregation level in {L1i}; and assign P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to get {L2j} from the processor, assign P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a first time; and assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in a second time, where P1+P2≤P. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to evenly assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of {L2j} in {L1i} to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of {L2j} in {L1i}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; or cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to assign the P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in {L2j}. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to determine {L2j} according to a DCI format of the EPDCCH to be detected and/or the number of available resource units of each physical resource block pair corresponding to the EPDCCH to be detected. - Optionally, as another embodiment, the
processor 1601 is specifically configured to determine at least one threshold according to the DCI format of the EPDCCH; and determine {L2j} according to the at least one threshold. - Optionally, as another embodiment:
- Under different set sizes of {2, 4, 8}, the total number of candidates is assigned among the aggregation levels. Under different set sizes, that is, the different numbers of physical resource block pairs, the number of enhanced control channel elements ECCEs is different. For example, when each physical resource block pair corresponds to physical resource units of 4 ECCEs, the number of enhanced control channel elements ECCEs in 2 physical resource block pairs is 8, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} that can be supported by the 2 physical resource block pairs are {8, 4, 2, 1, 0}, respectively; the total number of enhanced control channel elements in 4 physical resource block pairs is 16, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} that can be supported by the 4 physical resource block pairs are {16, 8, 4, 2, 1}, respectively. Accordingly, the total number of enhanced control channel elements in 8 physical resource block pairs is 32, and therefore, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} that can be supported by the 8 physical resource block pairs are {32, 16, 8, 4, 2}, respectively.
- There are two options for the assignment of the total number of candidates among different aggregation levels:
- (1). For the total number M of candidates,
candidate assignment 1 of each aggregation level is determined according to the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels that can be supported by a maximum set size, that is, the maximum number of physical resource block pairs; for example, the M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 8 physical resource block pairs. It is assumed that after the assignment, the total numbers of the candidates that can be supported by the aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are {4, 6, 2, 2, 2}, respectively. At this time, in a case of 4 physical resource block pairs, the total number of candidates of the aggregation level 16 is 2, but the total number of candidates that actually can be supported by the aggregation level 16 is only 1; however, no matter whether the number of physical resource block pairs in each set is 2, 4, or 8, the total number of candidates of the aggregation level 16 is 2 by default in this case. During candidate assignment between two sets for each aggregation level, further assignment among multiple sets based on a certain predetermined rule is performed according to the total number of candidates of each aggregation level determined in thecandidate assignment 1, such as {4, 6, 2, 2, 2} in the foregoing example. - (2). For the total number M of candidates,
candidate assignment 2 for each aggregation level under different set sizes is determined according to an actual size of each set, that is, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels that can be supported by physical resource block pairs in the set, where the total number of candidates that can be supported by each aggregation level should not exceed the total number of candidates that actually can be supported by the set. For example, M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 8 physical resource block pairs, and it is assumed that after the assignment, the total numbers of candidates that can be supported by the aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} are {4, 6, 2, 2, 2}, respectively. After M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 4 physical resource block pairs, the total numbers of candidates of the aggregation levels are {4, 6, 2, 2, 1}, or {4, 6, 3, 2, 1}, or {4, 7, 2, 2, 1}, or {5, 6, 2, 2, 1}, or the like, respectively. After M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 2 physical resource block pairs, the total numbers of candidates of the aggregation levels are {4, 4, 2, 1, 0} or {8, 4, 2, 1, 0}, and the like, respectively. Similarly, in a case where the aggregation levels that can be supported are {2, 4, 8, 16}, M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 8 physical resource block pairs in a similar way, and it is assumed that, after assignment, the total numbers of candidates that can be supported by the aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} are {6, 6, 2, 2}, respectively. After M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 4 physical resource block pairs, the total numbers of candidates of the aggregation levels are {6, 6, 2, 1}, or {6, 7, 2, 1}, or {7, 6, 2, 1}, and the like, respectively. After M candidates are assigned to different aggregation levels {2, 4, 8, 16} according to the total number of candidates that can be supported by 2 physical resource block pairs, the total numbers of candidates of the aggregation levels are {4, 2, 1, 0}, and the like, respectively.
During candidate assignment between two sets for each aggregation level, candidate assignment between two sets is performed according to the total number of candidates of each aggregation level under different set sizes determined in thecandidate assignment 2. Optionally, the corresponding total number of candidates of each aggregation level may be determined according to a size of a larger set between the two sets. For example, for two sets with set sizes of 4 and 8 respectively, candidates of each aggregation level are assigned between two sets based on the total number of candidates of each aggregation level corresponding to theset size 8, such as {4, 6, 2, 2, 2} corresponding to {1, 2, 4, 8, 16} in the foregoing example.
As foroption 2, an essential principle thereof may be concluded as follows: the total number of candidates of each aggregation level is associated with the total number of blind detection times corresponding to each DCI format and the total number of candidates corresponding to this aggregation level that actually can be supported by each set. - (3). Similar to the foregoing option (2),
candidate assignment 2 for each aggregation level under different set sizes is determined according to an actual size of each set, that is, the total numbers of candidates of different aggregation levels that can be supported by physical resource block pairs in the set, where the total number of candidates that can be supported by each aggregation level should not exceed the total number of candidates that actually can be supported by the set. During candidate assignment between two sets for each aggregation level, candidate assignment between two sets is performed according to the total number of candidates of each aggregation level under a maximum set size determined in thecandidate assignment 2. - In the foregoing options (2) and (3), the assignment of candidate of each aggregation level under different set sizes may be specifically shown as follows:
The assignment of candidate times in a set scenario in a centralized transmission mode:Normal subframes and special subframes, configuration 3, 4, 8, with available REs Xthresh <104 and using normal CPAll other cases Set size(PRB pair#) AL 2AL 4 AL 8AL 16 AL 1AL 2AL 4 AL 88 6 6 2 2 6 6 2 2 4 6 4 2 1 6 6 2 2 2 4 2 1 0 6 4 2 1 - The assignment of candidate times in a set scenario in a discrete transmission mode:
Normal subframes and special subframes, configuration 3, 4, 8, with available REs Xthresh <104 and using normal CPAll other cases Set size N(PRB pair#) 2 4 8 16 1 2 4 8 16 8 6 6 2 2 4 6 2 2 2 4 6 6 2 1 4 6 2 2 1 2 4 2 1 0 4 4 2 1 0 - A person of ordinary skill in the art may be aware that, with reference to the examples described in the embodiments disclosed in this specification, units and algorithm steps may be implemented by electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether the functions are performed by hardware or software depends on particular applications and design constraint conditions of the technical solution. A person skilled in the art may use different methods to implement the described functions for each particular application, but it should not be considered that the implementation goes beyond the scope of the present invention.
- It may be clearly understood by a person skilled in the art that, for the purpose of convenient and brief description, for a detailed working process of the foregoing system, apparatus, and unit, reference may be made to a corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiments, and details are not described herein again.
- In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed system, apparatus, and method may be implemented in other manners. For example, the described apparatus embodiments are merely exemplary. For example, the unit division is merely logical function division and may be other division in actual implementation. For example, a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not performed. In addition, the displayed or discussed mutual couplings or direct couplings or communication connections may be implemented through some interfaces. The indirect couplings or communication connections between the apparatuses or units may be implemented in electronic, mechanical, or other forms.
- The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and the parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one position, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. A part of or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the objectives of the solutions of the embodiments.
- In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each of the units may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.
- When the functions are implemented in a form of a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, the functions may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on such an understanding, the technical solutions of the present invention essentially, or the part contributing to the prior art, or a part of the technical solutions may be implemented in a form of a software product. The computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for instructing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device or the like) to perform all or a part of the steps of the methods described in the embodiments of the present invention. The foregoing storage medium includes: any mediums capable of storing program code, such as a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM, Read-Only Memory), a random access memory (RAM, Random Access Memory), a magnetic disk, or an optical disc.
- The foregoing descriptions are merely specific embodiments of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the protection scope of the present invention. Any variation or replacement readily figured out by a person skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the appended claims.
Claims (15)
- A method for assigning the number of control channel candidates, comprising:determining (101), by a base station, a first aggregation level set {L1i};determining (101), by the base station, the number of enhanced physical downlink control channel, EPDCCH, candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L1i}, wherein the {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N;determining (102), by the base station, a second aggregation level set {L2j}; anddetermining (102), by the base station, the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L2j}, wherein the {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, the {L2j} is a subset of the {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in the {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in the {L1i}, wherein the {L2j} is determined according to a threshold, which is determined for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X, and wherein the threshold applies to the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair; said method characterised in that the threshold is different to that determined for other formats.
- The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining, by the base station, the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L2j} comprises:determining, by the base station, N-M remaining aggregation levels after the aggregation levels in the {L2j} are removed from the {L1i};determining, by the base station, the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the N-M aggregation levels in the {L1i}; andassigning, by the base station, P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}.
- The method according to claim 2, wherein the assigning, by the base station, P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} comprises:assigning, by the base station, P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a first time; andassigning, by the base station, P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time, wherein P1+P2≤P.
- The method according to claim 3, wherein the assigning, by the base station, P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a first time comprises:evenly assigning, by the base station, the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}; orassigning, by the base station, the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of the {L2j} in the {L1i} to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of the {L2j} in the {L1i}; orassigning, by the base station, the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M; orassigning, by the base station, the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in the {L2j}.
- The method according to claim 3, wherein the assigning, by the base station, P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time comprises:cyclically assigning, by the base station, one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in the {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; orcyclically assigning, by the base station, one EPDCCH candidate to each aggregation level in the {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- A base station, comprising:a first determining unit (1301), configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of enhanced physical downlink control channel, EPDCCH, candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L1i}, wherein the {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N; anda second determining unit (1302), configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L2j}, wherein the {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, the {L2j} is a subset of the {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in the {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to L2j in the {L1i}, wherein the {L2j} is determined according to a threshold, which is determined for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X, and wherein the threshold applies to the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair; said based station characterised in that the threshold is different to that determined for other formats.
- The base station according to claim 6, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:determine N-M remaining aggregation levels after the aggregation levels in the {L2j} are removed from the {L1i};determine the total number P of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to the N-M aggregation levels in the {L1i}; andassign P EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}.
- The base station according to claim 7, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:assign P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a first time; andassign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time, wherein P1+P2≤P.
- The base station according to claim 8, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:evenly assign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}; orassign the P1 EPDCCH candidates according to a ratio of the number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to each aggregation level of the {L2j} in the {L1i} to the total number of EPDCCH candidates corresponding to all the aggregation levels of the {L2j} in the {L1i}; orassign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M; orassign the P1 EPDCCH candidates to one aggregation level in the {L2j}.
- The base station according to claim 8, wherein the second determining unit is configured to assign P2 EPDCCH candidates to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time comprises:cyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; orcyclically assign one EPDCCH candidate to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
- A user equipment, UE, comprising:a first determining unit (1401), configured to determine a first aggregation level set {L1i}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L1i}, wherein the {L1i} is formed by N aggregation levels supported by an enhanced physical downlink control channel, EPDCCH, i is a positive integer, and a value of i ranges from 1 to N; anda second determining unit (1402), configured to determine a second aggregation level set {L2j}, and determine the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level in the {L2j}, wherein the {L2j} is formed by M aggregation levels supported by an EPDCCH to be detected, j is a positive integer, a value of j ranges from 1 to M, the {L2j} is a subset of the {L1i}, M≤N, and the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in the {L2j} is greater than or equal to the number of blind detection times corresponding to L2j in the {L1i}, wherein the {L2j} is determined according to a threshold, which is determined for the EPDCCH transmitted in DCI format series 2X, and wherein the threshold applies to the number of valid resource units included in each physical resource block pair said user equipment characterised in that the threshold is different to that determined for other formats.
- The user equipment according to claim 11, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:determine N-M remaining aggregation levels after the aggregation levels in the {L2j} are removed from the {L1i};determine the number P of blind detection times corresponding to the N-M aggregation levels in the {L1i}; andassign P times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}.
- The user equipment according to claim 12, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:assign P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a first time; andassign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time, wherein P1+P2≤P.
- The user equipment according to claim 13, wherein the second determining unit is specifically configured to:evenly assign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j}; orassign the P1 times of blind detection according to a ratio of the number of blind detection times corresponding to each aggregation level of the {L2j} in the {L1i} to the total number of blind detection times corresponding to all the aggregation levels of the {L2j} in the {L1i}; orassign the P1 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} according to a proportional relationship between N and M; orassign the P1 times of blind detection to one aggregation level in the {L2j}.
- The user equipment according to claim 13, wherein the second determining unit is configured to assign P2 times of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in a second time comprises:cyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in sequence according to an ascending order of the aggregation levels; orcyclically assign one time of blind detection to the aggregation levels in the {L2j} in sequence according to a descending order of the aggregation levels.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CN2012/084025 WO2014067141A1 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2012-11-02 | Allocation method for control channel candidate number and blind detection frequency, base station and user equipment |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP18173995.4 Division-Into | 2018-05-24 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2863694A1 EP2863694A1 (en) | 2015-04-22 |
EP2863694A4 EP2863694A4 (en) | 2015-07-15 |
EP2863694B1 true EP2863694B1 (en) | 2018-08-08 |
Family
ID=50626360
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12887840.2A Active EP2863694B1 (en) | 2012-11-02 | 2012-11-02 | Allocation method for control channel candidate number and blind detection frequency, base station and user equipment |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US9730203B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2863694B1 (en) |
KR (2) | KR101689999B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103947274B (en) |
BR (1) | BR112015009772B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2879382C (en) |
MX (1) | MX360549B (en) |
RU (1) | RU2599729C1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014067141A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101895170B1 (en) * | 2016-08-11 | 2018-09-05 | 주식회사 케이티 | Apparatus and method for multicast |
AU2016434311A1 (en) * | 2016-12-26 | 2019-07-04 | Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. | Wireless communication method, network device and terminal device |
EP3567951B1 (en) * | 2017-01-26 | 2021-03-10 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Downlink control information processing method and apparatus |
CN108365913B (en) | 2017-01-26 | 2023-06-02 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and equipment for sending and receiving downlink control information |
CN108401294B (en) * | 2017-02-04 | 2021-10-26 | 华为技术有限公司 | Control information sending and receiving method, access network equipment and terminal equipment |
CN108809505B (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2019-12-24 | 维沃移动通信有限公司 | Transmission method of downlink control information, terminal and network side equipment |
CN109067499B (en) | 2017-06-13 | 2020-10-27 | 维沃移动通信有限公司 | Sending method and receiving method of downlink control information and related equipment |
IL271273B2 (en) | 2017-08-10 | 2023-12-01 | Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp Ltd | Wireless communication method, network device and terminal device |
KR20200118838A (en) * | 2018-02-13 | 2020-10-16 | 광동 오포 모바일 텔레커뮤니케이션즈 코포레이션 리미티드 | Method and terminal equipment for blind detection of physical downlink control channel |
CN110351841B (en) * | 2018-04-04 | 2023-01-10 | 中国移动通信有限公司研究院 | Detection method, sending method and equipment of physical downlink control channel |
CN110855405A (en) * | 2018-08-20 | 2020-02-28 | 普天信息技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for blind detection of downlink control channel of multi-sub-band system |
CN111865479B (en) | 2019-04-28 | 2022-04-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | Communication method and device |
CN111917520B (en) * | 2020-09-21 | 2022-04-01 | 紫光展锐(重庆)科技有限公司 | Paging DCI blind detection method, device and equipment |
Family Cites Families (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BRPI0813411B1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2020-10-13 | Wing Win Consulting Limited | communication method, base station and mobile terminal |
EP2196061B1 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2012-06-27 | Nokia Corporation | Signaling limitation of multiple payload sizes for resource assignments |
KR101448309B1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2014-10-08 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method of monitoring downlink control channel in wireless communication system |
JP5162416B2 (en) * | 2008-11-07 | 2013-03-13 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Wireless base station |
WO2010064844A2 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2010-06-10 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Transmission of scheduling assignments in multiple operating bandwidths |
US9705653B2 (en) * | 2009-05-04 | 2017-07-11 | Qualcomm Inc. | Downlink control transmission in multicarrier operation |
EP4447351A2 (en) * | 2009-06-02 | 2024-10-16 | BlackBerry Limited | System and method for reducing blind decoding for carrier aggregation |
EP3407640B1 (en) * | 2009-06-16 | 2020-02-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for mapping and detecting control channel |
CN102014494B (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2012-07-04 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Configuration method and device of downlink scheduling information |
CN102035772B (en) * | 2009-09-29 | 2014-06-04 | 华为技术有限公司 | Multi-carrier-based blind detection method and user equipment (UE) |
CN102045849B (en) * | 2009-10-12 | 2014-06-11 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | Sending method of physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) information as well as determination method and device of PDCCH search space |
KR20110049595A (en) * | 2009-11-05 | 2011-05-12 | 주식회사 팬택 | Apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving control information in wireless communication system |
CN102763473B (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2015-07-08 | 松下电器(美国)知识产权公司 | Base station and transmission method |
US20110292891A1 (en) * | 2010-05-26 | 2011-12-01 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Control channel allocation method, control channel searching method and communication apparatus using the same |
US8797922B2 (en) * | 2010-08-24 | 2014-08-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Handling ambiguous relay physical downlink control channel (R-PDCCH) decoding for a relay node |
US20120054258A1 (en) * | 2010-08-27 | 2012-03-01 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for Transmitting a Control Channel |
CN103493451B (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2016-08-17 | 爱立信(中国)通信有限公司 | Method and apparatus in wireless communication system |
CN103518415B (en) * | 2011-02-11 | 2017-05-24 | 交互数字专利控股公司 | Systems and methods for an enhanced control channel |
KR102067060B1 (en) * | 2011-06-29 | 2020-02-11 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and apparatus for transmitting control information in wireless communication system |
CN102255688B (en) * | 2011-07-06 | 2013-04-10 | 合肥东芯通信股份有限公司 | LTEPDCCH (Long Term Evolution System Physical Downlink Control Channel) blind inspection control method and device |
US9252918B2 (en) * | 2011-08-15 | 2016-02-02 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for control channel transmission and reception |
US20130064216A1 (en) * | 2011-09-12 | 2013-03-14 | Research In Motion Limited | DMRS Association and Signaling for Enhanced PDCCH in LTE Systems |
BR112014010289B1 (en) * | 2011-11-07 | 2022-05-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method at a transmitting node to transmit an enhanced downlink control channel, transmitting node, method at a user equipment to receive an enhanced downlink control channel, and, receiving node |
CN102404076B (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2014-12-10 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Information sending and blind-detecting method and equipment |
CN102368871B (en) * | 2011-11-10 | 2014-06-04 | 电信科学技术研究院 | Physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) resource configuration application method and apparatus thereof |
KR102524731B1 (en) * | 2012-01-27 | 2023-04-21 | 인터디지탈 패튼 홀딩스, 인크 | Systems and/or methods for providing epdcch in a multiple carrier based and/or quasi-collated network |
EP2816769B1 (en) * | 2012-03-19 | 2018-02-21 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Transmitting control channel |
WO2014048503A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Transmission and reception of enhanced pdcch |
-
2012
- 2012-11-02 KR KR1020167020038A patent/KR101689999B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-11-02 MX MX2015005365A patent/MX360549B/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-11-02 CA CA2879382A patent/CA2879382C/en active Active
- 2012-11-02 EP EP12887840.2A patent/EP2863694B1/en active Active
- 2012-11-02 KR KR1020157003210A patent/KR101643855B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-11-02 RU RU2015120744/07A patent/RU2599729C1/en active
- 2012-11-02 CN CN201280009692.5A patent/CN103947274B/en active Active
- 2012-11-02 BR BR112015009772-3A patent/BR112015009772B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-11-02 WO PCT/CN2012/084025 patent/WO2014067141A1/en active Application Filing
-
2015
- 2015-01-19 US US14/599,841 patent/US9730203B2/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-07-27 US US15/660,980 patent/US10075947B2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
LG ELECTRONICS: "Details of EPDCCH set configuration", vol. RAN WG1, no. San Diego, USA; 20121008 - 20121012, 29 September 2012 (2012-09-29), XP050662220, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_70b/Docs/> [retrieved on 20120929] * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9730203B2 (en) | 2017-08-08 |
RU2599729C1 (en) | 2016-10-10 |
CA2879382A1 (en) | 2014-05-08 |
EP2863694A1 (en) | 2015-04-22 |
CA2879382C (en) | 2019-06-04 |
KR101643855B1 (en) | 2016-07-29 |
US10075947B2 (en) | 2018-09-11 |
MX360549B (en) | 2018-10-26 |
US20170325206A1 (en) | 2017-11-09 |
US20150131591A1 (en) | 2015-05-14 |
CN103947274A (en) | 2014-07-23 |
WO2014067141A1 (en) | 2014-05-08 |
KR101689999B1 (en) | 2016-12-26 |
EP2863694A4 (en) | 2015-07-15 |
KR20160091455A (en) | 2016-08-02 |
CN103947274B (en) | 2018-08-21 |
MX2015005365A (en) | 2016-01-22 |
BR112015009772B1 (en) | 2022-10-04 |
BR112015009772A2 (en) | 2017-07-11 |
KR20150028351A (en) | 2015-03-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2863694B1 (en) | Allocation method for control channel candidate number and blind detection frequency, base station and user equipment | |
US10462778B2 (en) | Method, base station, and user equipment for communicating downlink control information | |
US10912038B2 (en) | Uplink scheduling method and apparatus | |
KR101688877B1 (en) | Pucch resource allocation for e-pdcch in communications system | |
EP3269068B1 (en) | Defining sub-subchannels for data communication using separately provided frequency and time resources and related terminals and network nodes | |
US10757725B2 (en) | Grant-free transmission method, network device, and terminal device | |
EP2693677A1 (en) | E-PDCCH for LTE Advanced wireless communication | |
US10912076B2 (en) | Physical downlink control channel transmission method and apparatus | |
EP2892295B1 (en) | Method for transmitting downlink control information, network side device and user equipment | |
EP3041303A1 (en) | Method, device and system for configuring search space | |
EP3041306A1 (en) | Method, user equipment and base station for transmitting uplink data | |
CN118511619A (en) | Multi-PDCCH monitoring and multi-PDSCH/PUSCH scheduling in wireless communications |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150114 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20150616 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H04W 72/04 20090101AFI20150610BHEP Ipc: H04L 5/00 20060101ALI20150610BHEP |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160318 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180219 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1028561 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602012049691 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180808 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1028561 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181108 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181109 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181208 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181108 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602012049691 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190509 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20181108 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181102 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181102 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181108 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180808 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20121102 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230929 Year of fee payment: 12 |