EP2372081A1 - Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid - Google Patents
Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2372081A1 EP2372081A1 EP10157025A EP10157025A EP2372081A1 EP 2372081 A1 EP2372081 A1 EP 2372081A1 EP 10157025 A EP10157025 A EP 10157025A EP 10157025 A EP10157025 A EP 10157025A EP 2372081 A1 EP2372081 A1 EP 2372081A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- water
- electro
- electrodes
- treatment
- sour
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 38
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 101
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 46
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 238000005370 electroosmosis Methods 0.000 claims description 40
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 38
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 229910000037 hydrogen sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 19
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000001962 electrophoresis Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002516 radical scavenger Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000007800 oxidant agent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims 4
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims 3
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims 3
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 7
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000008398 formation water Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 5
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000035699 permeability Effects 0.000 description 3
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000006065 biodegradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007795 chemical reaction product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000009508 confectionery Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008151 electrolyte solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000178 monomer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008366 buffered solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940112112 capex Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000006555 catalytic reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002738 chelating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005202 decontamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003588 decontaminative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012938 design process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005868 electrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009393 electroremediation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- FEBLZLNTKCEFIT-VSXGLTOVSA-N fluocinolone acetonide Chemical compound C1([C@@H](F)C2)=CC(=O)C=C[C@]1(C)[C@]1(F)[C@@H]2[C@@H]2C[C@H]3OC(C)(C)O[C@@]3(C(=O)CO)[C@@]2(C)C[C@@H]1O FEBLZLNTKCEFIT-VSXGLTOVSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000004435 hydrogen atom Chemical class [H]* 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002105 nanoparticle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003027 oil sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000638 solvent extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007723 transport mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/16—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons
- E21B43/24—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection
- E21B43/2401—Enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons using heat, e.g. steam injection by means of electricity
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid.
- US patent 5,676,819 discloses an in-situ electro-kinetic method for removal of cationic heavy metal contamination from soil, utilizing gas phase manipulation to inhibit biodegradation of a chelating agent that is used in an electro-kinetic process to remove the contamination.
- the method includes implanting spaced electrodes in the contaminated soil and applying a direct current across said electrodes to cause electro-kinetic remediation.
- US patent 5,676,819 relates to electro-kinetic soil decontamination techniques.
- Sour gas production is an important challenge for the oil and gas industry because of costly treatment, the production of huge amount of elemental sulphur as a treatment by-product, corrosive effects and environmental impacts.
- a new direction while dealing with this problem is to find a method to keep the sour elements of the gas, such as H 2 S and CO 2 , in the subsurface formation and not to produce said sour components along with the natural gas to the surface.
- This treatment method may be called subsurface sour gas desulphurization.
- An object of the present invention is to provide an electro-kinetic treatment process for in-situ upgrading of hydrocarbons produced from a subsurface formation.
- the invention therefore provides a method for electro-kinetic treatment of a pore fluid comprising hydrocarbon fluid, non-hydrocarbon fluid (e.g. water) and dissolved charged species (e.g. ions) and/or other components in a subsurface formation, the method comprising the steps of:
- the electro-kinetic effects may comprise Electro-Migration (EM), Electro-Phoresis (EP) and/or Electro-Osmosis (EO).
- EM Electro-Migration
- EP Electro-Phoresis
- EO Electro-Osmosis
- Water may be present in, or injected into, the pores of the formation and the electro-kinetic effects comprise Electro-Osmosis (EO), whereby the water is induced to migrate towards one of the electrodes.
- EO Electro-Osmosis
- the hydrocarbon fluid may be a sour gas comprising hydrogen sulfide.
- the hydrogen sulfide is dissolved in the flux of pore water that is forming the EO water curtain, thereby upgrading the sour gas by desulphurization and sweetening.
- Water may be introduced into the formation through a borehole comprising or located in the vicinity of one of the electrodes where the introduced water is induced to flow by Electro-Osmotic (EO) effects towards the other electrode carrying opposite charge.
- EO Electro-Osmotic
- the sour gas may comprise Hydrogen Sulfide (H 2 S) and the injected water may comprise a H 2 S scavenger and/or a H 2 S oxidizing agent, which oxidizes the H 2 S in-situ biologically by catalysis in the presence of micro-organisms, i.e. bio-catalyses.
- H 2 S Hydrogen Sulfide
- the injected water may comprise a H 2 S scavenger and/or a H 2 S oxidizing agent, which oxidizes the H 2 S in-situ biologically by catalysis in the presence of micro-organisms, i.e. bio-catalyses.
- the sour gas stream may be induced to flow through the formation in a direction substantially orthogonal to a plane defined by the electrodes and the gas may be produced through a substantially vertical gas production wells.
- the production well is surrounded by an array of electrodes and the water is flowing, by EO forces, among them forming a water curtain around the production well.
- Electro-Migration Electro-Migration
- EP Electro-Phoresis
- EO Electro-Osmosis
- Electro-Osmotic flow synonymous with Electro-Osmosis, is the motion of liquid induced by an applied electric potential gradient across, for instance, a porous and permeable material, or any other fluid conduit. Because Electro-Osmotic velocities can be independent of conduit size, Electro-Osmotic flow is most important when the fluid conduit is relatively small. Electro-Osmotic flow can occur in natural unfiltered water, as well as buffered solutions.
- Electro-Osmotic flow is caused by the Coulomb force induced by an electric field on net mobile electric charge in a solution. Because the chemical equilibrium between a solid surface and an electrolyte solution typically leads to the interface acquiring a net fixed electrical charge, a layer of mobile ions, known as an electrical double layer or Debye layer, forms in the region near the interface.
- the solid surface includes, for instance, sand or porous rock of a formation and the electrolyte solution includes water in the formation.
- the net charge in the electrical double layer is induced to move by the resulting Coulomb force.
- the water, in which the charged particles (e.g., Ions) are moving will move due to the friction forces induced by the moving charged particles.
- the resulting flow is termed Electro-Osmotic flow ( Tikhomolova, K.P., Electro-Osmosis, Ellis Horwood series in physical chemistry, 1993 ).
- a potential application for the electro-kinetics is in the subsurface desulphurization of sour gas that can be achieved by developing an EO water curtain around the production well.
- the water curtain is realized by letting the liquid phase (relatively saline water) to flow between electrodes installed in the subsurface reservoir around the gas production well, utilizing the EO forces, as shown schematically in Figure 1 .
- Figure 1 shows a gas production well 1, which is surrounded by an array of, for instance, eight electro-kinetic gas treatment wells 2A to 2H.
- the wells 2A, 2C, 2E and 2G comprise negatively charged electrodes or cathodes (shown as -) and the wells 2B, 2D, 2F and 2H comprise positively charged electrodes or anodes (shown as +).
- the treatment wells 2A-2H may be small diameter, low cost wells, wherein the diameter is small and costs are low in comparison to the diameter and costs of the production well 1.
- the diameter of the treatment wells is preferably just large enough to enclose one or more electrodes.
- the depth of the treatment wells and the production well 1 preferably extend into the formation to reach the reservoir bottom (i.e., the bedrock).
- the sour components of the gas flow 3 dissolve and dissociate in the water of the water curtain, so that a treated gas flow 5 having a lower amount of sour components continues towards the production well 1.
- the water curtain thus sweetens the sour gas stream 3.
- the dissolved sour components (H 2 S and/or CO 2 ) will be either reacting with a scavenger abiotically or biotically (i.e., catalyzed by the presence of micro-organism) in the water while the reaction products move towards the cathode carried with the water moving by EO or its dissociated species will be moving to either electrodes, depending on their charges, by EM.
- the sour components mass transfer rate from gas to water will be enhanced since both mechanisms provide a sink-like effect for dissolved sour components or its dissociated species in the water phase.
- Salinity of the formation water is an important factor in the design process, since a relatively high formation-water salinity can halt the Electro-Osmotic flow and/or short-circuit the electrodes.
- the Electro-Migration transport of dissolved ions, resulting from the dissociation of the sour components will be the main transport mechanism and the dissociation rate will be the limiting factor for the mass transfer from gas to water.
- the design of the method of the invention starts by estimating the water saturation and salinity, followed by calculating the required steady state current, potential, energy and costs.
- the exemplary embodiment shown in Figure 1 has eight treatment bores, wherein four of them act as water sinks (cathodes) and the other four act as water sources (anodes).
- Electro-Osmotic forces will drag water from the anodes (positively charged electrodes) to the cathodes (negatively charged electrodes) to form the water curtain 4 around the production well 1.
- the dissociated ions e.g.
- Electro-Migration (EM) towards the electrodes, decreasing the water resistance to H 2 S mass transfer towards water and allowing more dissolution to take place thus increasing the water capacity to absorb more H 2 S from the gas. I.e. the EM will act as a sink for the H 2 S. If we take into account the Electro-Migration (EM) sink-like effect, i.e.
- a sweetening ratio of about 1:10 could be obtained since the mobility of the ions is, at least, one order of magnitude higher than the water mobility (permeability) by EO [ Virkutyte, J., Sillanpaa, M., Latostenmaa, P., 2002, Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview, Sci. Total Environ. 289, 97-121 .].
- the electrodes of the treatment bores 2A-2H may be arranged at a substantially similar first distance d1 with respect to the production well 1.
- the treatment bores may be arranged at a substantially regular mutual spacing d2.
- the first distance is for instance in the range of 30 m to 80 m, for instance about 50 m.
- the mutual spacing may be in the range of 20 m to 60 m, for instance about 40 m.
- the electric field needed to establish a water curtain 4 suitable to lower the amount of sour components in the stream 3 of pore fluid may be in the range of 0.5 to 10 V/cm, for instance about 3 to 5 V/cm.
- Electric current may be in the range of 1 to 10 kAmps, for instance 1.1 to 3.5 kAmps.
- the electric power needed to sweeten one m 3 of gas may be ranging from a fraction of to several kW.hr/m 3 depending on the reservoir characteristics.
- the method of the present invention may reduce the amount of sour components in the pore fluid by, for instance, 10% to 50% with respect to the initial amount. Treatment facilities at surface may still be required to reduce the amount of sour components further to predetermined specifications. But the method of the invention enables the use of facilities at surface having significantly reduced CAPEX, for instance, due to lower corrosion and reduced safety hazards.
- Cost factors for establishing the water curtain include for instance the costs of drilling a number of treatment bores, introducing electrodes, consumed electrical power, pumping facilities to introduce water in the treatment bores and the water introduced in the treatment bores for the duration of the project.
- the method according to the invention may comprise the following steps:
- the method according to the invention may be used for sour gas sweetening, wherein
- the method according to the invention may also be applied for other applications, such as:
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Electricity Or Magnetism (AREA)
Abstract
A method for electro-kinetic treatment of a pore fluid comprising hydrocarbon fluid, such as natural gas (CH4), non-hydrocarbon fluid, such as water, and dissolved charged species, such as ions, and/or other components, such as CO2 and/or H2S, in a subsurface formation, the method comprising the steps of:
- transmitting an electric field through the subsurface formation by at least two electrodes (+ and -) traversing the formation; and
- inducing at least one of the charged species and/or other components to flow through the formation under the influence of the electric field, thereby upgrading the hydrocarbon fluid by at least one electro-kinetic effect of the electric field.
- transmitting an electric field through the subsurface formation by at least two electrodes (+ and -) traversing the formation; and
- inducing at least one of the charged species and/or other components to flow through the formation under the influence of the electric field, thereby upgrading the hydrocarbon fluid by at least one electro-kinetic effect of the electric field.
Description
- The invention relates to a method for electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid.
-
US patent 5,676,819 discloses an in-situ electro-kinetic method for removal of cationic heavy metal contamination from soil, utilizing gas phase manipulation to inhibit biodegradation of a chelating agent that is used in an electro-kinetic process to remove the contamination. The method includes implanting spaced electrodes in the contaminated soil and applying a direct current across said electrodes to cause electro-kinetic remediation. Thus,US patent 5,676,819 relates to electro-kinetic soil decontamination techniques. - The technical challenges to produce hydrocarbons from the subsurface are getting tougher in time. Therefore, the need for unconventional driving forces to influence the flow, transport and transfer of different phases and masses, in the subsurface, is on the rise.
- Sour gas production is an important challenge for the oil and gas industry because of costly treatment, the production of huge amount of elemental sulphur as a treatment by-product, corrosive effects and environmental impacts. A new direction while dealing with this problem is to find a method to keep the sour elements of the gas, such as H2S and CO2, in the subsurface formation and not to produce said sour components along with the natural gas to the surface. This treatment method may be called subsurface sour gas desulphurization.
- An object of the present invention is to provide an electro-kinetic treatment process for in-situ upgrading of hydrocarbons produced from a subsurface formation.
- The invention therefore provides a method for electro-kinetic treatment of a pore fluid comprising hydrocarbon fluid, non-hydrocarbon fluid (e.g. water) and dissolved charged species (e.g. ions) and/or other components in a subsurface formation, the method comprising the steps of:
- transmitting an electric field through the subsurface formation by at least two electrodes traversing the formation; and
- inducing at least one of the charged species and/or other components to flow through the formation under the influence of the electric field, thereby upgrading the hydrocarbon fluid by at least one electro-kinetic effect of the electric field.
- providing a production well for the production of the hydrocarbon fluid from the subsurface formation;
- providing two or more treatment bores at a first distance from the well;
- introducing at least one electrode in each of the treatment bores;
- establishing the electric field between the electrodes in adjacent treatment bores, wherein due to electro-kinetic effects water will flow along the electric field between the electrodes in the adjacent treatment bores, thereby creating a water curtain between the electrodes in the adjacent treatment bores;
- inducing the hydrocarbon fluid to flow towards the production well and through the water curtain,
- The electro-kinetic effects may comprise Electro-Migration (EM), Electro-Phoresis (EP) and/or Electro-Osmosis (EO).
- Water may be present in, or injected into, the pores of the formation and the electro-kinetic effects comprise Electro-Osmosis (EO), whereby the water is induced to migrate towards one of the electrodes.
- The hydrocarbon fluid may be a sour gas comprising hydrogen sulfide. Using the method of the invention the hydrogen sulfide is dissolved in the flux of pore water that is forming the EO water curtain, thereby upgrading the sour gas by desulphurization and sweetening.
- Water may be introduced into the formation through a borehole comprising or located in the vicinity of one of the electrodes where the introduced water is induced to flow by Electro-Osmotic (EO) effects towards the other electrode carrying opposite charge.
- The sour gas may comprise Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) and the injected water may comprise a H2S scavenger and/or a H2S oxidizing agent, which oxidizes the H2S in-situ biologically by catalysis in the presence of micro-organisms, i.e. bio-catalyses.
- The sour gas stream may be induced to flow through the formation in a direction substantially orthogonal to a plane defined by the electrodes and the gas may be produced through a substantially vertical gas production wells. The production well is surrounded by an array of electrodes and the water is flowing, by EO forces, among them forming a water curtain around the production well.
- These and other features, embodiments and advantages of the method according to the invention are described in the accompanying claims, abstract and the following detailed description of non-limiting embodiments depicted in the accompanying drawings, in which description reference numerals are used which refer to corresponding reference numerals that are depicted in the drawings.
-
-
Figure 1 shows a plan view of a gas production well according to the present invention which is surrounded by a number of electro-kinetic gas treatment bores which comprise electrodes. - The electric potential gradient deployment seems to have the prospect to play a role in influencing the flow and transport of fluids and masses in the subsurface. Upon applying an electric potential gradient between electrodes, installed in the subsurface, it will induce the following electro-kinetic effects in one or more of the pore fluids: a) Electro-Migration (EM): where ions fluxes are moving towards electrodes that carry opposite charges; b) Electro-Phoresis (EP): where charged particles are moving towards the electrodes that carry opposite charges; and c) Electro-Osmosis (EO): where net pore fluid, e.g. water, flux moves towards either electrodes depending on the charges of the soil grains. There are several likely scenarios for the electric potential gradient implementation in the subsurface where one or more of the electro-kinetic effects can be utilized.
- Electro-Osmotic flow, synonymous with Electro-Osmosis, is the motion of liquid induced by an applied electric potential gradient across, for instance, a porous and permeable material, or any other fluid conduit. Because Electro-Osmotic velocities can be independent of conduit size, Electro-Osmotic flow is most important when the fluid conduit is relatively small. Electro-Osmotic flow can occur in natural unfiltered water, as well as buffered solutions.
- Electro-Osmotic flow is caused by the Coulomb force induced by an electric field on net mobile electric charge in a solution. Because the chemical equilibrium between a solid surface and an electrolyte solution typically leads to the interface acquiring a net fixed electrical charge, a layer of mobile ions, known as an electrical double layer or Debye layer, forms in the region near the interface. Herein, the solid surface includes, for instance, sand or porous rock of a formation and the electrolyte solution includes water in the formation. When an electric field is applied to the fluid, the net charge in the electrical double layer is induced to move by the resulting Coulomb force. The water, in which the charged particles (e.g., Ions) are moving, will move due to the friction forces induced by the moving charged particles. The resulting flow is termed Electro-Osmotic flow (Tikhomolova, K.P., Electro-Osmosis, Ellis Horwood series in physical chemistry, 1993).
- A potential application for the electro-kinetics is in the subsurface desulphurization of sour gas that can be achieved by developing an EO water curtain around the production well. The water curtain is realized by letting the liquid phase (relatively saline water) to flow between electrodes installed in the subsurface reservoir around the gas production well, utilizing the EO forces, as shown schematically in
Figure 1 . -
Figure 1 shows a gas production well 1, which is surrounded by an array of, for instance, eight electro-kineticgas treatment wells 2A to 2H. Thewells wells treatment wells 2A-2H may be small diameter, low cost wells, wherein the diameter is small and costs are low in comparison to the diameter and costs of the production well 1. The diameter of the treatment wells is preferably just large enough to enclose one or more electrodes. The depth of the treatment wells and the production well 1 preferably extend into the formation to reach the reservoir bottom (i.e., the bedrock). - When the electrodes are charged as indicated in
Figure 1 , i.e. intermittently positively and negatively charged with respect to each other, electric fields are established between adjacent electrodes. Due to electro-kinetic effects, water in the formation (i.e., initially found formation water and eventually the water supplied from the positive electrodes) will start to move along the electric fields, thus effectively creating a socalled EO water curtain 4 between the electrodes. While moving towards the production well 1, thegas flow 3 has to go through the EO water curtain 4. At the water curtain the sourhydrocarbon gas flow 3 will contact the water of the water curtain 4. The contact between and the mixing of gas and water favours mass transfer of the sour components (H2S and/or CO2) from the gas phase to the water phase. The sour components of thegas flow 3 dissolve and dissociate in the water of the water curtain, so that a treatedgas flow 5 having a lower amount of sour components continues towards the production well 1. The water curtain thus sweetens thesour gas stream 3. The dissolved sour components (H2S and/or CO2) will be either reacting with a scavenger abiotically or biotically (i.e., catalyzed by the presence of micro-organism) in the water while the reaction products move towards the cathode carried with the water moving by EO or its dissociated species will be moving to either electrodes, depending on their charges, by EM. In both cases, the sour components mass transfer rate from gas to water will be enhanced since both mechanisms provide a sink-like effect for dissolved sour components or its dissociated species in the water phase. - Salinity of the formation water is an important factor in the design process, since a relatively high formation-water salinity can halt the Electro-Osmotic flow and/or short-circuit the electrodes. In that case, the Electro-Migration transport of dissolved ions, resulting from the dissociation of the sour components, will be the main transport mechanism and the dissociation rate will be the limiting factor for the mass transfer from gas to water.
- When the formation water salinity is relatively low, the design of the method of the invention starts by estimating the water saturation and salinity, followed by calculating the required steady state current, potential, energy and costs.
- In fact, many reservoirs contain water having a relatively high salinity that will lead to a lower value of the Zeta potential and consequently a smaller Electro-Osmotic permeability value and a higher value of the subsurface conductivity. The combination of these values will result in higher costs for sweetening the hydrocarbons. In such cases, initial injection of relatively sweet water in the vicinity of the electrodes to dilute the salinity of the formation-water is needed. The water is, for instance, injected via the two or more treatment bores comprising the electrodes
- The exemplary embodiment shown in
Figure 1 has eight treatment bores, wherein four of them act as water sinks (cathodes) and the other four act as water sources (anodes). - Electro-Osmotic forces will drag water from the anodes (positively charged electrodes) to the cathodes (negatively charged electrodes) to form the water curtain 4 around the production well 1.
Utilizing the H2S dissolution only (about 250 to 300 g/l under typical hydrocarbon reservoir conditions) while using partitioning coefficients under average reservoir conditions, one unit volume of ( newly introduced) water could clean up (absorb the H2S of) at least about 8 unit volumes of sour gas on average. The dissociated ions (e.g. H+ and HS-) after the H2S dissolution will be removed by Electro-Migration (EM) towards the electrodes, decreasing the water resistance to H2S mass transfer towards water and allowing more dissolution to take place thus increasing the water capacity to absorb more H2S from the gas. I.e. the EM will act as a sink for the H2S. If we take into account the Electro-Migration (EM) sink-like effect, i.e. ion movements due to an electric potential gradient, in addition to H2S dissolution in water, a sweetening ratio of about 1:10 could be obtained since the mobility of the ions is, at least, one order of magnitude higher than the water mobility (permeability) by EO [Virkutyte, J., Sillanpaa, M., Latostenmaa, P., 2002, Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview, Sci. Total Environ. 289, 97-121.]. - In a practical embodiment for the production of gaseous hydrocarbons from a formation, the electrodes of the treatment bores 2A-2H may be arranged at a substantially similar first distance d1 with respect to the production well 1. The treatment bores may be arranged at a substantially regular mutual spacing d2. The first distance is for instance in the range of 30 m to 80 m, for instance about 50 m. The mutual spacing may be in the range of 20 m to 60 m, for instance about 40 m. The electric field needed to establish a water curtain 4 suitable to lower the amount of sour components in the
stream 3 of pore fluid may be in the range of 0.5 to 10 V/cm, for instance about 3 to 5 V/cm. Electric current may be in the range of 1 to 10 kAmps, for instance 1.1 to 3.5 kAmps. In an average sour gas reservoir, the electric power needed to sweeten one m3 of gas may be ranging from a fraction of to several kW.hr/m3 depending on the reservoir characteristics. - Calculations indicate that, with a proper design of the treatment process, it is possible to develop an EO water curtain 4 around the production well 1 that can mix with the sour gas favouring its sweetening economically. Economically herein may indicate that the costs related to the water curtain are comparable to or lower than the costs related to conventional gas treating above the surface. The method of the present invention may reduce the amount of sour components in the pore fluid by, for instance, 10% to 50% with respect to the initial amount. Treatment facilities at surface may still be required to reduce the amount of sour components further to predetermined specifications. But the method of the invention enables the use of facilities at surface having significantly reduced CAPEX, for instance, due to lower corrosion and reduced safety hazards.
- Cost factors for establishing the water curtain include for instance the costs of drilling a number of treatment bores, introducing electrodes, consumed electrical power, pumping facilities to introduce water in the treatment bores and the water introduced in the treatment bores for the duration of the project.
- The method according to the invention may comprise the following steps:
- Relatively sweet water is being injected once, when needed, at the beginning of the treatment process from the
treatment wells 2A-2H to dilute the salinity of the matrix water, i.e. the water which is initially found in the reservoir, in order to avoid short-circuiting between adjacent electrodes with opposite polarities + and -. - Gas production is starting while the electric potential between electrodes + and - is applied to mobilize water by EO between the electrodes and develop the EO water curtain 4 between two or more of the treatment wells and at least partly around the production well 1.
- Depending on the sub-surface matrix (grains) charge type, water will be moving towards one of the electro-kinetic
gas treatment wells 2A-2H. Here, it is assumed that the formation matrix is negatively charged thus the water EO net flux will be towards the treatment wells having a negatively charged electrode, i.e. a cathode. - Initially, water may be kept inside the electro-kinetic
gas treatment wells - On pore scale, the gas as a non-wetting phase will be mainly flowing in the middle of the bigger pores while water as a wetting phase will be flowing in the smaller pores and nearby grains surfaces (Dake, L.P., Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering, 1978, Elsevier.). By accomplishing this, the possible contact area between water and gas will increase, thus enhancing mass transfer of the sour components (H2S and/or CO2) from the gas to the water phase.
- The dissolved sour components, its dissociated species and reaction products will be moving to either
electrode wells 2A-2H depending on their charge status and type by EO and/or by EM. A proper disposal methods for the water containing different species at each electrode well 2A-2H is designed, e.g., disposal by gravity (free fall) at the cathode or disposal to a different sub-surface layer at the anode. - The treatment process can be optimized by the use of numerical simulations that utilizes real values for the different designing parameters measured before and during the treatment process.
- The method according to the invention may be used for sour gas sweetening, wherein
- The sour gas content in the produced natural gas is reduced in situ (in the sub-surface), thereby minimizing the exposure to sour components leading to a considerable expenditure reduction on surface facilities and Health-Safety-Environmental (HSE) related issues.
- A water curtain surrounding the sour gas production well can be developed by applying an electrical potential gradient between pairs of electrodes in an array of electrodes where the water is flowing by Electro-Osmosis.
- Gas-water mixing is maximized by providing a considerable surface area between the two phases and introducing "new" water in the matrix between the electrodes (as explained earlier).
- With an appropriate engineering design and management of the treatment process and the reservoir electro-kinetic properties, e.g., electro-osmotic permeability and conductivity, the needed electric potentials, currents and energy can be optimized leading to even more economically sound treatment option.
- Submerged pumps may be used to periodically flush the water accumulated inside the electrodes, which includes diverse species, to the bottom of the reservoir or to another deeper or shallower formations.
- Abiotic (e.g., Scavengers) or biotic (e.g., bacteria) sour component scavengers can be added to the water moving between the electrodes and forming the EO water curtain 4 to increase the water capacity in cleaning the sour gas and consequently minimize the needed volume of water and energy for the treatment process.
- The method according to the invention may also be applied for other applications, such as:
- Installation of an array of electrodes around a gas production well to mobilize or remove water by electro-osmosis (EO) to avoid well impairment in hydrocarbon reservoirs.
- Mobilization of nano-particles, micro-organisms and/or surfactant monomers into certain zones and directions into the subsurface formation by electro-kinetic effects to enhance the hydrocarbon productivity, e.g. surfactant monomers drag into fractured carbonate reservoirs to change its wettability to water, or help in reservoir surveillance activities can be included in this patent.
- Production of gases, e.g. oxygen and hydrogen, nearby the electrodes by water electrolysis can be used in hydrocarbon productivity enhancement, e.g. stimulating biodegradation of bigger molecules into smaller ones in the case of oil-sand production. On the other hand, the H2S gas can be oxidized by oxygen in the gas phase nearby the cathode electrodes.
- Any combination of part or all of the above applications.
- The method of the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments thereof, wherein many modifications are conceivable within the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (15)
- A method for electro-kinetic treatment of a pore fluid comprising hydrocarbon fluid, non-hydrocarbon fluid and dissolved charged species and/or other components in a subsurface formation, the method comprising the steps of:- transmitting an electric field through the subsurface formation by at least two electrodes traversing the formation; and- inducing at least one of the charged species and/or other components to flow through the formation under the influence of the electric field, thereby upgrading the hydrocarbon fluid by at least one electro-kinetic effect of the electric field.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the non-hydrocarbon fluid comprises water , the charged species comprise ions dissolved in the water and the other components comprise sour components, such as dissociated H2S and/or CO2, and the method comprises the steps of:- providing a production well for the production of the hydrocarbon fluid from the subsurface formation;- providing two or more treatment bores at a selected distance from the production well;- introducing at least one electrode in each of the treatment bores;- establishing the electric field between the electrodes in adjacent treatment bores, wherein due to electro-kinetic effects at least a fraction of the water will flow, as a curtain of water, moving along the electric field between the electrodes in the adjacent treatment bores; and- inducing the hydrocarbon fluid to flow towards the production well and through the moving water curtain, wherein a mass transfer of the sour components is induced between the pore fluid and the curtain of moving water, thus resulting in a treated hydrocarbon fluid comprising a smaller amount of sour components than initially found in the pore fluid.
- The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the electro-kinetic effects comprise Electro-Migration (EM), Electro-Phoresis (EP) and/or Electro-Osmosis (EO).
- The method of claim 2, wherein the water is connate water initially present in, or injected through at least one of the treatment wellbores into, the pores of the formation and the electro-kinetic effects comprise Electro-Osmosis (EO), whereby the water is induced to flow towards one of the electrodes to form an EO water curtain between the electrodes.
- The method of any one of claim 1-4, wherein the hydrocarbon fluid comprises gaseous hydrocarbons.
- The method of claim 5, wherein the hydrocarbon fluid is a sour hydrocarbon gas comprising sour components, e.g., hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and/or carbon dioxide (CO2), wherein the sour components are dissolved in a flux of water created by the EO water curtain, thereby upgrading the sour gas by desulphurization and sweetening.
- The method of claim 4, wherein at least part of the water is introduced into the formation through one or more of the treatment bores and the introduced new water is induced to flow by Electro-Osmotic (EO) effects towards the electrode of one or more of the other treatment bores.
- The method of claim 7, wherein the sour gas comprises sour components and the introduced water comprises a scavenger or comprises an oxidizing agent, which scavenges and/or oxidizes the sour components in-situ in the presence of micro-organisms that act as a catalyzer.
- The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the hydrocarbon fluid is induced to flow through the formation in a direction substantially orthogonal to a plane defined by the electrodes.
- The method of any of the previous claims, wherein the hydrocarbon fluid is produced through a substantially vertical gas production well, which is surrounded by an array of treatment bores comprising electrodes.
- The method of claim 10, wherein the array comprises an even number of electrodes and adjacent electrodes have opposite polarities.
- The method of claim 2, wherein the electrodes of the treatment bores are arranged at a substantially similar distance from the production well and at a substantially regular mutual spacing.
- The method of claim 12, wherein the distance is in the range of 30 m to 80 m, for instance about 50 m.
- The method of claim 12, wherein the mutual spacing is in the range of 20 m to 60 m, for instance about 40 m.
- The method of any one of claims 1-14, wherein the electric field has a strength in the range from 0.5 to 10 V/cm, for instance between 3 and 5 V/cm.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10157025A EP2372081A1 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2010-03-19 | Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10157025A EP2372081A1 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2010-03-19 | Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2372081A1 true EP2372081A1 (en) | 2011-10-05 |
Family
ID=42263579
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10157025A Withdrawn EP2372081A1 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2010-03-19 | Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2372081A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102441564A (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2012-05-09 | 上海市环境科学研究院 | Electric remediation method for heavy metal contaminated soil by composite electrode |
US20120152570A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and Method For Enhancing Oil Recovery From A Subterranean Reservoir |
US20120273190A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2012-11-01 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Electrokinetic enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from oil shale |
US20150233224A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2015-08-20 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and method for enhancing oil recovery from a subterranean reservoir |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0312174A1 (en) * | 1987-10-13 | 1989-04-19 | Hydraconsult B.V. | A process for electroreclamation of soil material, an electric current system for application of the process, and an electrode housing for use in the electric current system |
GB2301125A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1996-11-27 | Norske Stats Oljeselskap | Treatment of subsurface hydrocarbon reservoirs |
US5676819A (en) | 1996-04-23 | 1997-10-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | In situ removal of contamination from soil |
US20050199387A1 (en) * | 2002-10-24 | 2005-09-15 | Wittle J. K. | Method for enhancing oil production using electricity |
WO2008074056A1 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-26 | Thomas David G | A method of delivering a treatment substance to a target substance in a treatment zone |
-
2010
- 2010-03-19 EP EP10157025A patent/EP2372081A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0312174A1 (en) * | 1987-10-13 | 1989-04-19 | Hydraconsult B.V. | A process for electroreclamation of soil material, an electric current system for application of the process, and an electrode housing for use in the electric current system |
GB2301125A (en) * | 1995-05-25 | 1996-11-27 | Norske Stats Oljeselskap | Treatment of subsurface hydrocarbon reservoirs |
US5676819A (en) | 1996-04-23 | 1997-10-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | In situ removal of contamination from soil |
US20050199387A1 (en) * | 2002-10-24 | 2005-09-15 | Wittle J. K. | Method for enhancing oil production using electricity |
WO2008074056A1 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-26 | Thomas David G | A method of delivering a treatment substance to a target substance in a treatment zone |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
DAKE, L.P.: "Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering", 1978, ELSEVIER |
TIKHOMOLOVA, K.P.: "Electro-Osmosis", ELLIS HORWOOD SERIES IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993 |
VIRKUTYTE, J.; SILLANPAA, M.; LATOSTENMAA, P.: "Electrokinetic soil remediation-critical overview", SCI. TOTAL ENVIRON, vol. 289, 2002, pages 97 - 121 |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120152570A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2012-06-21 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and Method For Enhancing Oil Recovery From A Subterranean Reservoir |
US20120273190A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2012-11-01 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Electrokinetic enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from oil shale |
US9033033B2 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2015-05-19 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Electrokinetic enhanced hydrocarbon recovery from oil shale |
US20150233224A1 (en) * | 2010-12-21 | 2015-08-20 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | System and method for enhancing oil recovery from a subterranean reservoir |
CN102441564A (en) * | 2011-10-14 | 2012-05-09 | 上海市环境科学研究院 | Electric remediation method for heavy metal contaminated soil by composite electrode |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2007352367B2 (en) | Electrolytic system for enhanced release and deposition of sub-surface components | |
Cameselle | Enhancement of electro-osmotic flow during the electrokinetic treatment of a contaminated soil | |
Segall et al. | Electroosmotic contaminant-removal processes | |
Alshawabkeh et al. | Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction | |
US9896356B2 (en) | Electrokinetic process for consolidation of oil sands tailings | |
KR100296374B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for decontaminating contaminated soil in radioactive waste drum by electro-electric method | |
CN103406347B (en) | One can be used for heavy metal and organic method in Enriching soil | |
EP2372081A1 (en) | Electro-kinetic treatment of a subsurface pore fluid | |
US20130277046A1 (en) | Method for enhanced oil recovery from carbonate reservoirs | |
CA2822028A1 (en) | System and method for enhancing oil recovery from a subterranean reservoir | |
Cabrera-Guzman et al. | The use of electrokinetics for hazardous waste site remediation | |
CA2736675C (en) | Electrokinetic process and apparatus for consolidation of oil sands tailings | |
Liu et al. | Low permeability zone remediation of trichloroethene via coupling electrokinetic migration with in situ electrochemical hydrodechlorination | |
US7547160B2 (en) | Method of delivering a treatment substance to a target substance in a treatment zone | |
Zhou et al. | Electrokinetic Remediation of Fluorine‐C ontaminated Soil Using Approaching Cathodes | |
JP2017538572A (en) | Improvement of matrix processing and / or matrix contents and related improvements | |
Murillo-Rivera et al. | Influence of anolyte and catholyte composition on TPHs removal from low permeability soil by electrokinetic reclamation | |
Alam | Fundamentals of electro-flotation and electrophoresis and applications in oil sand tailings management | |
Hassan et al. | Electrokinetic remediation with solar power for a homogeneous soft clay contaminated with copper | |
JP4739702B2 (en) | Purification method for contaminated ground | |
Cameselle et al. | Electrochemical remediation for contaminated soils, sediments and groundwater | |
Medel et al. | Novel electrokinetic remediation system-Boron Doped Diamond (EKR-BDD) process for the destruction of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in liquid phase. | |
Ammami et al. | Heavy metals removal from dredged sediments using electro kinetics | |
RU2425962C1 (en) | Production method of oil, natural gas and gas condensate by their electromagnetic resonant displacement from productive formation | |
Shiba et al. | In-situ electrokinetic remediation of groundwater contaminated by heavy metal |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA ME RS |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN |
|
18W | Application withdrawn |
Effective date: 20120221 |