EP2126897A1 - Mast-mounted sonar - Google Patents
Mast-mounted sonarInfo
- Publication number
- EP2126897A1 EP2126897A1 EP08708941A EP08708941A EP2126897A1 EP 2126897 A1 EP2126897 A1 EP 2126897A1 EP 08708941 A EP08708941 A EP 08708941A EP 08708941 A EP08708941 A EP 08708941A EP 2126897 A1 EP2126897 A1 EP 2126897A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- mast
- sonar
- float
- platform
- head
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000007654 immersion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000195493 Cryptophyta Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008602 contraction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10K—SOUND-PRODUCING DEVICES; METHODS OR DEVICES FOR PROTECTING AGAINST, OR FOR DAMPING, NOISE OR OTHER ACOUSTIC WAVES IN GENERAL; ACOUSTICS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G10K11/00—Methods or devices for transmitting, conducting or directing sound in general; Methods or devices for protecting against, or for damping, noise or other acoustic waves in general
- G10K11/004—Mounting transducers, e.g. provided with mechanical moving or orienting device
- G10K11/006—Transducer mounting in underwater equipment, e.g. sonobuoys
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the general field of sonar protection of coastal areas and the monitoring of ports. It relates more particularly to a means to ensure, with greater efficiency, the deployment and implementation of sonar systems, installed immersed fixed position, so as to achieve such protection.
- the underwater environment to be monitored generally corresponds to shallow water, although this depth can reach several tens of meters.
- the propagation of sound waves is not rectilinear: their path has a curvature that depends in particular on variations in the speed of sound with depth. Since the sea is not a homogeneous medium, but rather a medium that can present different superimposed layers presenting sudden differences in temperature, the sound waves undergo at the level of the interfaces separating the different layers a modification of their trajectory, which results in a curvature this one.
- the intensity of the deviation of the sound wave paths depends on the velocity of the sound in the propagation medium, itself varying with the depth, so that a sound emitted by a sound source will travel a different path depending on the depth at which this source is located. This variation is also different depending on the climatic conditions and in particular the seasons.
- the range performance of a sonar is the maximum distance a target can reach so that the sonar that emits an acoustic wave can detect the signal reflected by that target.
- performance prediction software tools parameterized using bathythermic data, are generally used.
- the equipment is, in the vast majority of cases, fixed on the sea floor, on a massive support which serves as ballast.
- Such an implementation obviously does not allow to obtain a maximum range in all geographical / climatic cases and for the different types of sonar (frequency, antenna, ).
- the reverberation especially that from the bottom, is often preponderant and limits the detection range of the sonar.
- the latter is strongly related to the position of the transmitter in the water column, optimizing the position of the transmitter in the water column is an effective way to improve the sonar detection range.
- An object of the invention is to propose a solution making it possible to make better use of bathythermal data, when implementing fixed sonar monitoring systems, intended to provide a safety function. monitoring, in order to maximize the scope of the system, taking into account the propagation of sound.
- An advantageous solution for taking advantage of the bathymetric data, and therefore of the more or less advantageous propagation characteristics that the immersion medium can present at a given depth is to use a sonar placed at a certain distance from the bottom. say placed between two waters at a depth allowing it to offer the best range characteristics.
- the invention relates to a deployment device for a sonar monitoring system, comprising mainly:
- a platform designed to be mounted on the top of the mast and configured to receive sonar equipment
- a float arranged to be fixed on the mast, close to the top, whose buoyancy is sufficient to maintain the mast in a vertical position, when it is subjected to the action of movements of the water masses in which it is immersed, the length of the mast being determined to position the sonar at a depth at which it provides maximum coverage and range performance.
- the mast is a telescopic mast whose length is adjustable and comprises remotely controllable adjustment means.
- the mast comprises means for releasably attaching to the anchoring structure.
- the float has sufficient buoyancy to float the assembly constituted by the mast, the platform and the sonar when the mast is disengaged from the anchoring structure.
- the system comprises means for towing the disengaged system from the anchoring structure to a selected site having another anchoring structure.
- the deployment device has the advantage of making possible the use of a sonar system having no particular compensation of roll and pitch, but also that of a sonar system having these functions.
- a sonar intended to be placed on the bottom can therefore be used without modifications.
- the invention also relates to a surveillance system comprising a local sonar transceiver and a remote processing and management system, comprising:
- a sonar transceiver installed on the platform of the installation device, connecting means for connecting the sonar transceiver to the rest of the monitoring system and supplying the necessary electrical energy to the assembly and the control commands intended for the mast of the device.
- Such a system has the advantage of providing long-term monitoring (port or coast protection) which remains effective over time, while bathymetric variations with the seasons have a significant impact on the performance of the system.
- the invention also has an interest in terms of overall area coverage.
- the implementation of the invention makes it possible to minimize the number of sonar heads by using an omnidirectional coverage in azimuth (see the example illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5).
- FIG. 1 the schematic diagram of the structure of the device according to the invention
- FIG. 2 the block diagram of the structure of a preferred embodiment of the device according to the invention
- FIG. 3 an illustration of a phase of the deployment of a surveillance system comprising the device according to the invention in its preferred embodiment
- the device according to the invention comprises, as illustrated in FIG. 1, the following elements:
- the anchoring structure 1 1 has the main characteristic of being a massive element capable of staying at the bottom despite possible movements of water bodies. It is also able to keep all the elements of the device immersed. As such, this structure can have a shape and a constitution variable depending on the case. It can thus, as illustrated in Figure 1, take the form of a concrete block, or any other dense material, placed or anchored on the bottom. It can also for certain particular applications take the form of a metal structure planted at the bottom. In the case of a permanent monitoring system, the support structure is generally installed irremovably.
- the support mast 12 has for its function to allow the positioning of the platform 13 at a given depth. Its length h is therefore determined accordingly. It is attached to the anchoring structure substantially vertically. Rigid structure, it is designed and realized, in a known manner, to have a resistance adapted to the bending stresses that may be imposed on it, by the movement of water masses in which it is immersed. Its hydrodynamics and masses are determined in order to maintain a vertical position with an acceptable pitch and roll amplitude for the sonar equipment in terms of mechanical stress, as well as in terms of degradation of sonar detection distance performance, degradation due to pitch and roll of the antenna at the top of the mast. It may for example be constituted by a cylindrical pylon made of composite material or metal. In addition, the mast may be designed to limit its own vibrations due to currents, for example by being equipped with a fairing.
- the platform 13 serves to host the sonar head 16 consisting mainly of the antenna, and, depending on the sonar equipment considered, all or part of the electronics of the sonar transceiver of the system.
- the sonar head is fixed on the platform, preferably removably, by appropriate means, not described herein.
- the platform 13 is fixedly mounted at the top of the mast 12.
- the length h of the support mast 12 is determined from the bathythermic data so that the sonar head 16 placed on the platform 13 is immersed to a depth such that the sonar head has maximum performance in terms of range. detection.
- the float 14 in turn has the role of limiting as much as possible the movements of the platform, movements mainly consecutive movements of water bodies such as wave movements or currents.
- the size (volume and weight) and the material constituting the float are determined in a known manner according to the worst weather conditions that can be encountered on the site. Its buoyancy is determined in particular so that the force that tends to bring it up to the surface advantageously opposes any bending movement of the mast while not exerting excessive force on the fastening means which ensures the fixing of the mast 12 to the anchoring structure.
- the buoyancy of the float 14 is calculated so that the angle ⁇ taken by the mast, under the action of the external constraints imposed by the movement of the water bodies, can not exceed a few degrees, compared to the vertical, this limit being variable according to the type of sonar used (antenna size, frequency, ). In this way, compensation of the movements of the platform is not essential for processing the sonar data.
- the mast 12 is fixed to the anchoring structure so as to limit the variations of orientation of the sonar head, so that no correction is imperatively required. Nevertheless, it should be noted that, since the mast is free in its pitching and rolling movements, the use of position sensors can improve the overall performance of the system. It makes it possible to evaluate in real time the impact of the variations of the positioning of the sonar head on its detection performances and possibly to correct this impact.
- the transmission of the sonar information from the sonar head placed on the platform 13 to the deported processing and management organs, for example on the ground, as well as that of the operating commands sent from these same management organs to the sonar head is This means, of varied nature, may for example consist of an electrical connection cable or an optical cable.
- connection means can also be used to supply power to the sonar head 1 6 as well as to the entire device.
- a cable then provides two-way data links and power from the shore.
- the device thus described advantageously makes it possible to position the sonar head at a chosen depth, while ensuring a sufficiently stable position for it so that no particular compensation of the sonar information is necessary because of the movements of the water masses.
- the device according to the invention is provided with a platform for installing the sonar head.
- the sonar head can be installed at the top of the mast, directly above the float 14 or if it is designed to include an inner housing, inside this float.
- the device according to the invention as described above is an advantageous deployment solution compared to that of placing the sonar head directly on the bottom.
- This solution advantageously makes it possible to position the sonar head at a depth making it possible, to a certain extent, to optimize the reach of the sonar, the compensation of the movements of the mast by the float 14 making it possible moreover to use an identical sonar head, without any particular system of motion compensation.
- This solution can however be improved to obtain the preferred embodiment described in the following document.
- This preferred embodiment differs from the generic structure illustrated in FIG. 1, in that the device has, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the following characteristics:
- the support mast is a telescopic mast 21 having means for varying its length.
- the support mast is constituted by a telescopic tubular structure 21.
- This structure is set in motion by means for controlling the elongation or contraction.
- These means not shown in the figure may, in known manner, be mechanical, hydraulic or electrical. They can also be operated remotely from the shore.
- the connecting cable 15 is designed to transmit the corresponding commands of elongation or retraction. Its configuration is further adapted to take these variations into account.
- a mast 21 of variable length h is thus available making it possible to position the sonar head 16, fixed at its top, to a depth d that can vary on command, as a function, for example, of climatic or meteorological conditions.
- the bathythermic conditions being variable over time, particularly according to the seasons, it is advantageously possible with this preferred form of the device according to the invention, to position the sonar head at a depth which allows the moment considered get the maximum reach.
- a telescopic mast 21 makes it possible to arbitrarily position the sonar head 16 at a given depth. This possibility can for example advantageously find its usefulness when the positioning of the sonar head below or beyond a given depth is for example impossible (or otherwise necessary) because of the presence of temporary natural obstacles (schools of fish, algae, etc.).
- the telescopic support mast 21 has the characteristic of being fixed to the anchoring structure removably, by fastening means 22, a universal joint and shackles for example, allowing the mast to pass from a locked state in which it is fixed to the anchoring structure January 1, in an unlocked state where it is completely separated from the anchoring structure January 1.
- these locking means 22 are advantageously remote-operable so that the separation of the support mast 21 from the anchoring structure 11 can be achieved without the intervention of divers on the bottom.
- This configuration is particularly advantageous when the anchoring structure January 1 is located at a depth unfavorable to human interventions (typically from 30m), which is quite often the case.
- this preferred embodiment has great advantages in terms of maintenance and operation.
- the operations relating to this task can advantageously be simplified by controlling a maximum extension of the telescopic mast 21.
- the depth d at which the platform is located 13 supporting the sonar head 16 is decreased, which facilitates for example the intervention of divers responsible for disassembly and possibly replacement of the sonar head.
- a mast 21 that can be extended to an appropriate length it is even conceivable to emerge the platform 13 and make possible a surface intervention.
- this preferred form of implementation of the device according to the invention makes it possible to facilitate the deployment of the sonar surveillance system of which the device is a part.
- the fact that the support mast 12 and the elements attached thereto (platform, float and sonar head) can be detached from the anchoring structure 1 1 allows to consider a variable deployment around the area to monitor. To do this, it is sufficient, for example, to position anchoring structures 1 1 by differing selected locations, then to position the sonar head fixed on its support mast vertically to the anchoring structure chosen at a given instant, and finally to immerse the mast and lock it to the anchor structure considered.
- the float of the device according to the invention may also advantageously consist of a variable buoyancy structure, comprising for example ballasts.
- a variable buoyancy structure comprising for example ballasts.
- Figures 4 and 5 illustrate the advantage of using a device according to the invention to achieve for example a coastal surveillance sonar system.
- Figure 4 illustrates how one generally deploys a conventional sonar detection system within a bay or harbor.
- the detection system comprises several sonars immersed on the seabed.
- Each sonar 42 covers an area of the submarine space materialized by an arc 44 more or less complete depending on the surrounding submarine relief.
- the depth generally grows from the coast towards the center of the bay one is here forced, the sonars being placed on the bottom, to arrange several sonar close to the coast 41, sonars whose number must be sufficient for that together these sonars can cover the entire bay.
- the control center 43 generally placed on the ground, thus communicates with the various equipment 42 by means of a network of links 45 all the more important as the number of sonar equipment necessary is greater.
- the deployment device according to the invention is described in the context of the implementation with a sonar head. It is obvious that such an implementation context is neither exhaustive nor limiting.
- the device according to the invention can be implemented in any other neighboring area where it is necessary or at least advantageous to maintain a submerged equipment at a given depth.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0701317A FR2913147B1 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2007-02-23 | SONAR MONTE ON MAT |
PCT/EP2008/051719 WO2008107270A1 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2008-02-13 | Mast-mounted sonar |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2126897A1 true EP2126897A1 (en) | 2009-12-02 |
EP2126897B1 EP2126897B1 (en) | 2017-12-13 |
Family
ID=38739953
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08708941.3A Active EP2126897B1 (en) | 2007-02-23 | 2008-02-13 | Mast-mounted sonar |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100322033A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2126897B1 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2913147B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008107270A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109459743B (en) * | 2018-12-24 | 2024-08-27 | 成都洛的高新材料技术有限公司 | Sonar detection mechanism |
KR102333193B1 (en) * | 2020-07-01 | 2021-11-30 | (주)지오시스템리서치 | Swing type bar check support |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3418624A (en) * | 1967-03-27 | 1968-12-24 | Dynamics Corp Massa Div | Coaxially mounted line hydrophone |
DE2143116C1 (en) * | 1971-08-28 | 1987-02-19 | Krupp Gmbh | |
DE2557992C3 (en) * | 1975-12-22 | 1978-06-29 | Kraftwerk Union Ag, 4330 Muelheim | Test system carrier for testing the connection nozzle area in pressure vessels, especially reactor pressure vessels of nuclear power plants with ultrasound |
US5398214A (en) * | 1979-11-28 | 1995-03-14 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Pressure responsive clasp |
US4756269A (en) * | 1983-09-29 | 1988-07-12 | Raytheon Company | Cable fairing stacking ring |
GB8624666D0 (en) * | 1986-10-15 | 1997-09-17 | Dowty Electronics Ltd | Sonar suspension apparatus |
FR2624473B1 (en) * | 1987-12-15 | 1990-05-18 | Aerospatiale | HYDRAULIC DEVICE FOR INDIVIDUAL CONTROL OF THE STEP OF A ROTOR BLADE, AND ROTOR HUB AND ROTOR EQUIPPED WITH SUCH DEVICES |
US5188054A (en) * | 1991-11-25 | 1993-02-23 | Jacobs Jr John F | Watercraft towing apparatus |
US5577942A (en) * | 1995-07-28 | 1996-11-26 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Station keeping buoy system |
CA2402256A1 (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-09-13 | Emmanuel Livadiotti | Radio broadcasting device and relay tower therefor |
AU2002255900B2 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2006-12-07 | Fmc Technologies, Inc. | Connection arrangement for spider buoy to connector |
US6400645B1 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2002-06-04 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Sonobuoy apparatus |
US6771562B2 (en) * | 2002-06-02 | 2004-08-03 | Techsonic Industries, Inc. | Fish finding method and system |
US7114882B1 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2006-10-03 | Jan Friedmann | Aqua-terra planetary transport system and development pneumatic and electro-magnetic underwater tube-link transportation system |
US20060016621A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2006-01-26 | Placer Dome Technical Services Limited | Method and system for deep sea drilling |
US7230882B2 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2007-06-12 | Lowrance Electronics, Inc. | Transducer support and associated lock |
-
2007
- 2007-02-23 FR FR0701317A patent/FR2913147B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2008
- 2008-02-13 WO PCT/EP2008/051719 patent/WO2008107270A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-02-13 EP EP08708941.3A patent/EP2126897B1/en active Active
- 2008-02-23 US US12/528,425 patent/US20100322033A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2008107270A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2126897B1 (en) | 2017-12-13 |
FR2913147A1 (en) | 2008-08-29 |
FR2913147B1 (en) | 2010-09-03 |
WO2008107270A1 (en) | 2008-09-12 |
US20100322033A1 (en) | 2010-12-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7957220B2 (en) | Active steering for marine seismic sources | |
US8758072B2 (en) | Marine device | |
EP2126897B1 (en) | Mast-mounted sonar | |
EP3027499B1 (en) | Marine object able to float on water, comprising a deployable device for emitting and/or receiving electromagnetic waves | |
EP3198586B1 (en) | Omnidirectional antenna | |
FR3066996A1 (en) | COLLABORATIVE SYSTEM OF SUBAQUATIC VEHICLES FOR MONITORING IMMERGED LINEAR ELEMENTS AND METHOD IMPLEMENTING SAID SYSTEM | |
FR3046129A1 (en) | ||
EP3558808B1 (en) | Line intended to be immersed in an aquatic environment | |
EP0788969B1 (en) | Semi-submergible, self-propelled and radio controlled underwater vehicle | |
WO1993001971A1 (en) | Portable station for the measurement and adjustment of the magnetic signature of a naval vessel | |
FR3093699A1 (en) | Semi-submersible wind turbine float, associated wind turbine assembly and anchoring method | |
EP2267837A1 (en) | Integrated mast having two levels and a radome with removable pannel | |
EP0912906B1 (en) | Method and device for helicopter-borne mine countermeasures | |
US20240224945A9 (en) | Deployable marine sensor system | |
EP3326236B1 (en) | Mobile antennas support device | |
FR2902194A1 (en) | Boat e.g. naval vessel, magnetic signature measuring device for controlling e.g. acoustic indiscretion, has measurement sensor measuring magnetic signature of boat and constituted by three axle magnetometer, and signal acquisition unit | |
GB2603970A (en) | Deployable Marine Sensor System | |
FR3074473A1 (en) | METHOD FOR RECOVERING FLOATING DEVICES AND ASSOCIATED FLOATING DEVICE | |
FR2907418A1 (en) | Naval surface drone for observing and transmitting water coarse stream image, has supporting unit supporting transmitting system and constituted by mast which is removably mounted on body, and maintaining unit maintaining mast in position |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20090826 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: BERGOGNE, CHRISTIAN Inventor name: LE GRAS, HERVE |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20161213 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170704 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 955096 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171215 Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
RAP2 | Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred) |
Owner name: THALES |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602008053326 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20171213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180313 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 955096 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180313 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180413 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602008053326 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180914 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180213 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180228 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20190212 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171213 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20080213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200214 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230606 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240116 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240118 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240123 Year of fee payment: 17 |