EP1996792B1 - Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1996792B1 EP1996792B1 EP07735094A EP07735094A EP1996792B1 EP 1996792 B1 EP1996792 B1 EP 1996792B1 EP 07735094 A EP07735094 A EP 07735094A EP 07735094 A EP07735094 A EP 07735094A EP 1996792 B1 EP1996792 B1 EP 1996792B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- borehole
- assembly
- sensor
- wellbore
- acoustic energy
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 63
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims description 59
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 56
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 claims description 46
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000000153 supplemental effect Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 50
- 206010017076 Fracture Diseases 0.000 description 20
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 17
- 208000010392 Bone Fractures Diseases 0.000 description 15
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 5
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 5
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 5
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001629 suppression Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000006096 absorbing agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000010287 polarization Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000001018 Hibiscus sabdariffa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005291 Rumex acetosa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000007001 Rumex acetosella Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000005534 acoustic noise Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011221 initial treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000116 mitigating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011236 particulate material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000003513 sheep sorrel Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B47/00—Survey of boreholes or wells
- E21B47/01—Devices for supporting measuring instruments on drill bits, pipes, rods or wirelines; Protecting measuring instruments in boreholes against heat, shock, pressure or the like
- E21B47/017—Protecting measuring instruments
Definitions
- the subject matter of the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring.
- Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase conductivity of a subterranean formation for recovery or production of hydrocarbons and to permit injection of fluids into subterranean formation or into injection wells.
- a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the formation through a wellbore.
- Particulate material known as proppant may be added to the fracturing fluid and deposited in the fracture as it is formed to hold open the fracture after hydraulic fracturing pressure is relaxed.
- the hydraulic fracturing fluid As the hydraulic fracturing fluid is delivered from the surface to the subterranean formation through the wellbore, it is important that the pressured fluid for fracturing be directed into the formation or formations of interest.
- the subterranean formation or formations are hydraulically fractured through either perforations in a cased well bore or in an isolated section of the open well bore.
- One important consideration for fracturing for hydrocarbon production or waste disposal is directing the fracture into a desired formation.
- the orientation of the hydraulic fracture is controlled by formation characteristics and the stress regime in the formation. It is important to monitor the fracture as it is being formed to insure that it does not extend beyond the intended zone and has the desired extent and orientation.
- microseisms It is known that hydraulic fracturing operations in a wellbore generate significant seismic activity as a result of the fracture growth into a subterranean formation. Fluid injected under pressure into a subterranean formation causes a pressure build up until the in-situ stress in a subterranean formation is exceeded, resulting in fractures in the formation that extend some distance from the wellbore. This formation fracturing creates a series of small "micro-earthquakes" known as microseisms.
- closest prior art document US 5,503,225 discloses a system for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations, wherein sensors are mounted on a coiled tubing string above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through the coiled tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to perforations in the formation.
- US 6,446,727 discloses a process for hydraulically fracturing multiple zones of a wellbore.
- US 5,524,709 discloses a method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore, wherein an isolation device is mounted above a subterranean formation of interest where fracturing occurs (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to perforations).
- sensors mounted in soluble cement located above and below the formation of interest acoustically monitor the fracturing operation.
- sensors mounted in monitoring wells also acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
- microseismic mapping One method known for monitoring the location and size of a hydraulic fracture is called microseismic mapping.
- a second offset well is used for monitoring hydraulic fracturing activities in the primary treatment or injection well.
- a plurality of acoustic sensors e.g., geophones
- These sensors in the offset well are used to record signals that result from microseisms caused by the stress induced in the subterranean surface formations by the hydraulic fracture fluid pressure build-up in the treatment or injection well.
- microseismic monitoring are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,170 by Withers, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,996,726 by Sorrels and Warpinski .
- location of fractures within an injection well are monitored in separate instrumented monitoring wells using acoustic signals resulting from microseismic events caused by the fracturing activity in the injection well.
- Separate dedicated monitoring wells however add significant expense to these methods. Limited efforts have been made to use devices deployed in injection or treatment wells for microseismic monitoring in treatment or injection wells.
- a method for mitigating risk of adversely affecting hydrocarbon productivity e.g.
- acoustic sensors are deployed in an injection well for microseismic monitoring. The sensors are isolated in the annulus of the waste injection well, with the sensors generally being attached to the tubing string.
- US 4,775,009 discloses a process for installing seismic sensors inside a well, wherein sensors 1 are embedded in a casing which is position above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to orifices). Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation.
- US 2004/206495 discloses fracturing mapping by the use of tiltmeters which are mounted directly onto the wall of a wellbore casing. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing string, and then directing the fluid by packers and to openings in the casing and thus into the formation.
- a technique that is usable with a well includes deploying an assembly into a wellbore.
- the assembly includes at least one sensor.
- a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the wellbore to hydraulically fracture a subterranean formation of interest.
- the technique includes measuring acoustical energy that is generated by the hydraulic fracturing using the sensor(s).
- an apparatus for use in a well includes an assembly that has a tool body with at least one acoustic energy sensor that is disposed thereon.
- the assembly also includes an isolation device to isolate the acoustic energy sensor from a hydraulic fracture operation.
- Fig. 1 is a well according to an embodiment of the invention.
- Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a sensor sonde according to an embodiment of the invention.
- Fig. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to monitor acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
- Fig. 4 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to perform hydraulic fracturing in different zones of a well and monitor the fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention.
- a well 8 includes acoustic energy sensors 160 that are located downhole for purposes of monitoring the acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing.
- Sensors 160 may be isolated from a formation of interest 60 in which hydraulic fracturing occurs. Due to the isolation, flow noise attributable to the fracturing operation does not affect the measurements by the sensors 160, and furthermore, the sensors 160 are protected from the impact of the fracture treatment.
- the sensors 160 are part of sensor sondes 120 (sensor sondes 120 1 , 120 2 and 120 3 , being depicted as examples in Fig. 1 ) of a borehole monitoring assembly 10 of a downhole borehole assembly 100.
- the borehole assembly 100 optionally includes an isolation device, such as a isolation device 50 (a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples), for purposes of isolating the sensor sondes 120 (and thus, the sensors 160) from the fracturing operation.
- a isolation device 50 a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples
- the borehole assembly 100 may be run into the well 8 using one of many conveyance mechanisms, such as a tubular string 30 that is depicted in Fig. 1 .
- the string 30 may be coiled tubing.
- a surface acquisition system 80 may be in communication with the borehole monitoring assembly 100 via a communication line 40, such as a wireline, slickline, fiber optics or a fiber optics tether.
- Fiber optic tether refers to fiber optics deployed within a protective cover or small diameter protective tubing.
- the communication line 40 may be contained or deployed in the string 30 to provide communication from the surface control system to the borehole monitoring assembly 100 or communication from the borehole monitoring assembly 100 to the surface control system or both. Communication and/or power may be provided by the communication lines 40, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be any assembly or tool, which is suited to monitor acoustic signals in a wellbore.
- each sonde 120 of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be a similar sensor to the sonde that is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,170,601.
- Fig. 2 depicts an exemplary embodiment of the sonde 120 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
- the sonde 120 includes a tool body 124, which has a cavity 130 in an opening in the wall of the tool body 124.
- the cavity 130 receives an acoustic energy sensor package 140, which is positioned in the cavity 130 and is mounted on resilient mounts 150 (springs, for example) to press the acoustic sensor package 140 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well is cased), yet isolate the sensors 160 of the package 140 from fluid-conveyed pressure disturbances.
- the sonde 120 may include three of the sensors 160, each of which senses acoustic energy along a different axis (x, y or z axis).
- the sonde 120 may also include an arm 136 that is activated to press the sonde 120 against the borehole wall (or casing string 22, if the well 10 is cased) for purposes of placing the sensors 160 in proximity to the wellbore or casing string 22.
- the well 8 may be cased (via the casing string 22) or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. If installed, the casing string 22 may extend from the surface along the entire length of a wellbore.20, or only along a portion of the wellbore 20.
- the wellbore 20 in which the borehole assembly 100 is deployed may be a deviated or lateral wellbore. In some embodiments in a deviated or lateral wellbore, a tractor may be used to deploy the borehole assembly 100.
- the well 10 may be a subterranean or a subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims.
- the well 8 has been perforated in a previous trip by a perforating gun to form corresponding perforations in the casing string 22 and corresponding perforation tunnels 61, which extend into the formation of interest 60.
- the borehole assembly 100 is deployed in the well 8 for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of the fracturing.
- Such hydraulic fracturing may be desired or performed for a variety of purposes, such as but not limited to increasing or improving hydrocarbon recovery from the formation of interest 60 or injecting fluid, such as water, produced water, enhanced oil recovery fluids, or gas into formation of interest 60.
- the term fracturing fluid as used herein includes any fluid injected for the purposes of fracturing the formation and includes but is not limited to treatment fluids, enhanced recovery fluids, and disposal fluids.
- Fig. 1 only one subterranean formation of interest 60 for the purposes of illustration. It is contemplated that there may be multiple subterranean formations of interest 60 in any wellbore 20; and these multiple formations may be hydraulically fractured separately, together, or in various combinations as the operator so desires.
- Isolation device 50 is also deployed into the wellbore on a string 30, as part of the borehole assembly 100. More specifically, the isolation device 50 may be positioned along the string 30 above the borehole monitoring assembly 10.
- the sensors 160 form an array of sensors and may be selected from any appropriate sensing devices such as geophones, hydrophones, or accelerometers, and various combinations that generate signals in response to received acoustic energy. Any one type of acoustic energy sensor or a combination of types may be used.
- the acoustic energy sensor or sensors should have good sensitivity to acoustic energy in the microseismic frequency band greater than 30 Hz. This band may extend as high as 4 kiloHertz (kHz), as an example.
- More than one acoustic energy sensor may be used in combination with other acoustic sensors to form an acoustic energy sensor package.
- Embodiments may comprise a plurality of tri-axial (3 orthogonal) geophones to provide sensing capabilities in three directions.
- Such acoustic sensor packages may be spaced at desired intervals (e.g. 15.24 meters (50 ft)) along the wellbore 20.
- Acoustic sensor packages may be coupled to the wellbore wall or casing 22 via an anchoring system for borehole seismic tools.
- the signals that are generated by each of the sensors 160 in response to acoustical energy are digitized and transmitted through the communication line 40 to the surface acquisition system 80, at the surface of the well 8.
- the sensors 160 may provide a digital or optical signal directly to the communication line 40 or a converter may be used to convert the acoustic signals received by the sensors to digital or optical signals for transmission.
- the surface acquisition system 80 may employ methods, such as digital filters, to remove noise from the hydraulic fracturing pumping operations from the generated signals.
- the signals generated by each sensor are recorded in one or more memory devices that may be part of the borehole monitoring assembly 10, the memory devices generally being recoverable with the bottomhole monitoring assembly 10.
- the signals may also be transmitted via the communication line 40, while in other embodiments the signals are not also transmitted via a communication line, as the sensor data that is stored in the memory devices may be retrieved after the borehole assembly 100 is retrieved from the well.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the acoustic energy sensors 160 thereof are positioned in the wellbore at a location that is not adjacent to the formation of interest 60.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned below the formation of interest 60.
- borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned in the wellbore in a location that it not adjacent to the perforated zone in the casing.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be placed below the perforated zone and thus, as depicted in Fig. 1 , the sondes 120 may be suspend from a cable from a tubular body that is mounted to the isolation device 50 and forms the lower end of the string 30.
- the isolation device 50 is deployed in the wellbore 20 to separate the borehole monitoring assembly 10 from the subterranean formation of interest 60. In this manner, the borehole monitoring assembly 10 is isolated from hydraulic fracturing or injection activity undertaken in subterranean formation of interest 60.
- a noise suppression device or devices such as a shock absorber may be provided, being placed between isolation device 50 and borehole monitoring assembly 10.
- noise suppression methods such as slacking the connecting cable between components, may be used to reduce the possibility of noise transmission.
- Noise suppression devices or methods similarly may be used between the sensors 160 in an array.
- noise suppression may be performed by digitally processing the signals generated by the measurements made by the acoustic energy sensors.
- Borehole assembly 100 may also include apparatuses or features for use in the hydraulic fracturing process.
- one such apparatus may be a jetting nozzle 86 that is placed above the isolation device 50 to permit fluids to be pumped down the string 30 and out the jetting nozzle 86 to clean out debris such as sand that may accumulate above the packer 30.
- the jetting nozzle 86 may also be used for purposes of perforating the casing string 22 and forming the perforation tunnels 61 in lieu of a perforating gun.
- the borehole assembly 100 may include a feature such as a clean-out port, which may be selectively opened or closed and located above isolation device 50 to permit, if desired, fluid pumped down the annulus to reverse flow the fluid up coiled tubing. Methods such as ball drops or mechanical actuation may be used to selectively open or close a clean-out port.
- borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional isolation devices located above borehole monitoring assembly 10. Additional isolation devices may be single or multi-set.
- the borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional devices to provide wellbore information.
- the borehole assembly 100 may further include a pressure or temperature sensor or both.
- a gyroscope may be provided for use in orientating the sensors 160 or for determining the orientation of the borehole monitoring assembly 10 to permit subsequent data adjustment.
- the sensors may be orientated by methods such as a three component hodogram analysis that uses the recording of a calibration shot in a nearby well or at the surface.
- the tool orientation may by calculated by the known methods such as using plane geometry and the assumption of a straight ray from source to receiver, projecting the ray onto a perpendicular plane and rotating the projection through the horizontal polarization angle to give the direction of the x-component sensor and the relative bearing angle or the method of calculating the relative bearing angle from the 3C polarization of the direct P-wave arrival as described in Becquey, M. and Dubesset, M., 1990, Three-component sonde orientation in a deviated swell (short note): Geophysics, Society of Exploration. Geophyics, 55, 1386-1388.
- the borehole assembly 100 may include other devices, which are directed to other functions.
- the borehole assembly 100 may include a casing collar locator (CCL) 87 that is used for purposes of precisely locating the borehole assembly 100 downhole or other tool.
- the CCL 87 may be a magnetically-sensitive device that generates a signal (observed at the surface of the well 8) for purposes of detecting casing joints of the casing 22 for purposes of precisely locating the assembly 100. This may be helpful for purposes of precisely locating the jetting nozzles 86 when the jetting nozzles 86 perforate the casing 22 and the formation of interest 60.
- the assembly 100 may include a tension sub 85, which is located below the isolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to the sondes 120.
- a tension sub 85 which is located below the isolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to the sondes 120.
- the borehole assembly may include a supplemental sensor, for example a pressure or temperature sensor, capable of providing a downhole measurement.
- the measurement obtained using the supplemental sensor may be used in conjunction with or separately from the measurements obtained using sensors 160 to monitor hydraulic fracturing.
- the supplemental sensor may be an additional acoustic sensor, such as a hydrophone, useful for measuring noise in the form of borehole acoustic waves.
- the supplemental sensor may be an accelerometer.
- a plurality of supplemental sensors, specifically acoustic sensors, may be provided. Output from this supplemental sensor may be used to digitally suppress or remove noise by processing the measurements from the acoustic sensor(s). This use is different from the use of measurements from acoustic sensors in an array to eliminate noise by cumulative processing of the measurements such as known for vertical seismic profiles.
- the borehole assembly 100 may also include, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, a remotely-actuated latch, or connector 89, for purposes of selectively connecting the borehole assembly 100 to and releasing the assembly 100 from the string 30 (thereby leaving the assembly 100 downhole) when multiple zones are treated, as further described below.
- a remotely-actuated latch or connector 89
- the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring may proceed as follows in accordance with some embodiments of the invention.
- the wellbore 20 is first completed with the casing 22, and then, the casing 22 is perforated at one or more subterranean formations of interest 60.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 10 may then be conveyed into the wellbore 20 on the string 30.
- the isolation device 50 is simultaneously conveyed in wellbore 20 on the string 30 at a desired position above assembly 10.
- the isolation device 50 is set in place to provide a seal in the annulus between the string 30 and the casing 22, thereby isolating borehole monitoring assembly 10 in wellbore 20 below isolation device 50. If additional isolation devices are provided, they may be actuated or set in place to provide further isolation between the borehole monitoring assembly 10 and the isolation device 50.
- Hydraulic fracturing fluid or injection fluid is then pumped at pressure down the annulus formed between conveyance 30 and casing 22 or wellbore wall and into the subterranean formation of interest 60.
- the hydraulic fracturing fluid may be any fluid useful for fracturing a subterranean formation, including but not limited to wellbore treatment fluids, hydrocarbons, water, produced water, disposal water, foamed fluids or gases, such as natural gas or CO 2 .
- isolation device 50 and if provided, additional isolation device or devices, separate borehole monitoring assembly 10 from hydraulic fracturing fluids and operations performed in the wellbore above isolation device 50.
- Isolation device 50 may be any packer, inflatable or mechanical device capable of being set and released that provides sufficient sealing pressure within the wellbore to isolate the borehole monitoring assembly from the pressured hydraulic fracturing or injection fluid.
- the isolation device 50 includes feed-throughs to permit communication line 40 to pass through the isolation device 50 and to borehole monitoring assembly 10.
- Some embodiments may include stiff bridles or deployment bars for use in deploying borehole sensor assembly 10 in deviated, horizontal or pressurized wells.
- a technique 200 may be used to monitor the hydraulic fracturing of a particular formation of interest.
- the borehole assembly 100 is run into the well into position, pursuant to block 204, the borehole assembly comprising an acoustic sensor.
- a hydraulic fracturing operation is then performed by pumping fracturing fluid into the wellbore at pressure, pursuant to block 206.
- the one or more acoustic sensors are used to monitor acoustic energy pursuant to block 208.
- the acoustic energy monitored may be from fracturing operations, or may result from fracturing operations in which the hydraulic fracturing fluid comprises an acoustic signal generating element, such as a noisy proppant described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,492 .
- Sensor 160 is used to monitor the operation or the signals generated by the acoustic signal generating element.
- the borehole assembly 100 may be used in conjunction with the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of several zones in the well.
- a technique 250 includes running (block 254) a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore (block 258). The borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well, pursuant to block 262. Next, the isolation device 50 is set (block 266) and a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation, pursuant to block 270. In some embodiments, a fracturing model may be established and updated using a measurement from sensor 160.
- zones may be fractured and monitored in the well as set forth in Fig. 4 .
- the technique 250 is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
- a technique includes running a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth.
- the perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore.
- the borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well.
- borehole assembly 100 may comprise the perforating device.
- a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and the sensors 160 are used to monitor the operation.
- zones may be fractured and monitored in the well.
- the technique is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
- the borehole monitoring assembly 100 and techniques that are described herein may offer one or more advantages and/or improvements over conventional hydraulic monitoring techniques and devices.
- placement of the borehole monitoring assembly in the injection well rather than a separate monitoring well reduces the time and expense required for drilling a separate well.
- Placing the acoustical sensors below the packer isolates the sensors from the fracturing fluid and reduces the risk of damage to the sensors from the fracturing fluid as it is pumped down the wellbore.
- placing communication line 40 within the string 30 isolates it from the fracturing fluid pumped down the annulus and significantly reduces the possibility of erosion or damage to the communication line.
- the placement of sensors 160 below the isolation device 50 has the effect of providing isolation from flow-induced noise.
- noise generated by pumping fracturing fluid in a wellbore has inhibited the ability to make successful microseismic measurements in the injection well.
- Several elements are used individually or in combination in the present invention to isolate and attenuate wellbore noise. Placing the acoustic energy sensor or sensors below the isolation device 50 provides a barrier to direct flow noise. Isolation device 50 is designed to efficiently allow setting/unsetting, cleaning of sand deposited on top, and enablement of noise isolation techniques (e.g., slacking). Configuring sensors 160 in an acoustic energy sensor package and mechanically isolating the sensor package 140 (see Fig.
- Isolation device 50 may comprise a compressional setting that is operational on a downward movement that accommodates slacking of communication line 40.
- Shock absorbers designed to attenuate noise propagating in the bottomhole-assembly may be inserted between isolation device 50 and the acoustic sensors.
- Digital filtering may be used to identify upward and downward propagating noise with distinctly different characteristics from the microseisms.
- Such digital filtering techniques such as adaptive beamforming or velocity filtering may be used to attenuate noise.
- a sub-array of hydrophones placed within an array of geophones or accelerometers may be useful for identifying and removing propagating fluid (tube) waves.
- pumping noise is at low frequencies ( ⁇ 20Hz) much below the typical microseismic band and may be substantially removed by conventional high-pass filters.
- the borehole assembly 100 may further include other measurement devices such as pressure, temperature, gyroscopes, or any other device useful for measuring indications of fracture characteristics.
- the borehole assembly 100 may also include fracturing tools positioned above the isolation device 50 for use in the hydraulic fracturing process, such as jetting nozzle, clean-up port, etc.
- the borehole assembly 100 may include a single or multi-set isolation devise above the measurement devises to protect it from the impact of the fracture treatment.
- the borehole assembly 100 may be used in a lateral wellbore. Therefore, many variations are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims.
Landscapes
- Geology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The subject matter of the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring.
- Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase conductivity of a subterranean formation for recovery or production of hydrocarbons and to permit injection of fluids into subterranean formation or into injection wells. In a typical hydraulic fracturing operation, a fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the formation through a wellbore. Particulate material known as proppant may be added to the fracturing fluid and deposited in the fracture as it is formed to hold open the fracture after hydraulic fracturing pressure is relaxed.
- As the hydraulic fracturing fluid is delivered from the surface to the subterranean formation through the wellbore, it is important that the pressured fluid for fracturing be directed into the formation or formations of interest. Typically, the subterranean formation or formations are hydraulically fractured through either perforations in a cased well bore or in an isolated section of the open well bore. One important consideration for fracturing for hydrocarbon production or waste disposal is directing the fracture into a desired formation. The orientation of the hydraulic fracture is controlled by formation characteristics and the stress regime in the formation. It is important to monitor the fracture as it is being formed to insure that it does not extend beyond the intended zone and has the desired extent and orientation.
- It is known that hydraulic fracturing operations in a wellbore generate significant seismic activity as a result of the fracture growth into a subterranean formation. Fluid injected under pressure into a subterranean formation causes a pressure build up until the in-situ stress in a subterranean formation is exceeded, resulting in fractures in the formation that extend some distance from the wellbore. This formation fracturing creates a series of small "micro-earthquakes" known as microseisms. These discrete, localized microseisms occur during the growth of fractures, and the amplitude of the seismic or acoustical energy (compressional ("P") waves and shear ("S") waves) are generated with significant enough amplitude to be detected by remote sensors. Accordingly, by sensing and recording the P and S waves and their respective arrival times at each of the sensors, the acoustical signals can be processed in accordance with known seismic or earthquake monitoring methodology to determine the position of the microseisms. Hence, the geometry of the fracture and its location may be inferred. One method for determining the orientation of fractures resulting from hydraulic fracturing operations is described in
U.S. Patent No. 6,985,816 . - For example, closest prior art document
US 5,503,225 discloses a system for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations, wherein sensors are mounted on a coiled tubing string above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through the coiled tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to perforations in the formation. -
US 6,446,727 discloses a process for hydraulically fracturing multiple zones of a wellbore. -
US 5,524,709 discloses a method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore, wherein an isolation device is mounted above a subterranean formation of interest where fracturing occurs (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to perforations). During the fracturing, sensors mounted in soluble cement located above and below the formation of interest acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. In addition, sensors mounted in monitoring wells also acoustically monitor the fracturing operation. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation. - One method known for monitoring the location and size of a hydraulic fracture is called microseismic mapping. In this method, a second offset well is used for monitoring hydraulic fracturing activities in the primary treatment or injection well. In microseismic mapping, a plurality of acoustic sensors (e.g., geophones) are positioned in a well offset from the well to be fractured. These sensors in the offset well are used to record signals that result from microseisms caused by the stress induced in the subterranean surface formations by the hydraulic fracture fluid pressure build-up in the treatment or injection well.
- Examples of microseismic monitoring are described in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,771,170 by Withers, et al. andU.S. Pat. No. 5,996,726 by Sorrels and Warpinski . In the methods therein, location of fractures within an injection well are monitored in separate instrumented monitoring wells using acoustic signals resulting from microseismic events caused by the fracturing activity in the injection well. Separate dedicated monitoring wells however add significant expense to these methods. Limited efforts have been made to use devices deployed in injection or treatment wells for microseismic monitoring in treatment or injection wells. InU.S. Pat. No. 6,935,424 , a method for mitigating risk of adversely affecting hydrocarbon productivity (e.g. screen out) during fracturing by monitoring the fracturing process is described. The method uses tiltmeters coupled to the casing or borehole wall in the well undergoing hydraulic fracturing to mechanically measure deformation, the deformation measurement being used to infer fracture dimensions. In this method however less than desirable coupling of the tiltmeters to the casing or borehole wall significantly impacts the accuracy of the inferred dimensions. InU.S. Pat. No. 5,503,225 acoustic sensors are deployed in an injection well for microseismic monitoring. The sensors are isolated in the annulus of the waste injection well, with the sensors generally being attached to the tubing string. In such a configuration however the acoustic noise in the downhole tubing caused by the fluid injection will be sensed by such a system and likely will significantly mask any sensed microseismic events. While these methods eliminate the need and expensive of the dedicated monitoring wells, the limitations of each preclude their use to accurately distinguish microseismic events.US 4,775,009 discloses a process for installing seismic sensors inside a well, wherein sensors 1 are embedded in a casing which is position above both an isolation device and a subterranean formation of interest (the portion of the wellbore adjacent to orifices). Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing, and then directing the fluid by a packer to orifices in the formation. -
US 2004/206495 discloses fracturing mapping by the use of tiltmeters which are mounted directly onto the wall of a wellbore casing. Fracturing occurs in the subterranean formation of interest by injecting a fluid through tubing string, and then directing the fluid by packers and to openings in the casing and thus into the formation. - Thus, there is a continuing need for better ways to reliably and accurately monitor hydraulic fracturing and injection operations.
- In an embodiment of the invention, a technique that is usable with a well includes deploying an assembly into a wellbore. The assembly includes at least one sensor. A fracturing fluid is injected under pressure into the wellbore to hydraulically fracture a subterranean formation of interest. The technique includes measuring acoustical energy that is generated by the hydraulic fracturing using the sensor(s).
- In another embodiment of the invention, an apparatus for use in a well includes an assembly that has a tool body with at least one acoustic energy sensor that is disposed thereon. The assembly also includes an isolation device to isolate the acoustic energy sensor from a hydraulic fracture operation.
- Advantages and other features of the invention will become apparent from the following drawing, description and claims.
-
Fig. 1 is a well according to an embodiment of the invention. -
Fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a sensor sonde according to an embodiment of the invention. -
Fig. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to monitor acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention. -
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram depicting a technique to perform hydraulic fracturing in different zones of a well and monitor the fracturing according to an embodiment of the invention. - Referring to
Fig. 1 , in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, a well 8 includesacoustic energy sensors 160 that are located downhole for purposes of monitoring the acoustical energy that is generated by hydraulic fracturing.Sensors 160 may be isolated from a formation ofinterest 60 in which hydraulic fracturing occurs. Due to the isolation, flow noise attributable to the fracturing operation does not affect the measurements by thesensors 160, and furthermore, thesensors 160 are protected from the impact of the fracture treatment. - In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the
sensors 160 are part of sensor sondes 120 (sensor sondes Fig. 1 ) of aborehole monitoring assembly 10 of adownhole borehole assembly 100. In addition to theborehole monitoring assembly 10, theborehole assembly 100 optionally includes an isolation device, such as a isolation device 50 (a compression-set packer, a mechanically-set packer, a hydraulically-set packer, a weight-set packer, swellable bladder, plug, etc., as just a few examples), for purposes of isolating the sensor sondes 120 (and thus, the sensors 160) from the fracturing operation. - The
borehole assembly 100 may be run into thewell 8 using one of many conveyance mechanisms, such as a tubular string 30 that is depicted inFig. 1 . As a more specific example, the string 30 may be coiled tubing. - In general, a
surface acquisition system 80 may be in communication with theborehole monitoring assembly 100 via acommunication line 40, such as a wireline, slickline, fiber optics or a fiber optics tether. Fiber optic tether refers to fiber optics deployed within a protective cover or small diameter protective tubing. One example of a data receiving and processing system that may serve as thesurface acquisition system 80 is described inU.S. Patent No. 6,552,665 . Thecommunication line 40 may be contained or deployed in the string 30 to provide communication from the surface control system to theborehole monitoring assembly 100 or communication from theborehole monitoring assembly 100 to the surface control system or both. Communication and/or power may be provided by thecommunication lines 40, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. - The
borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be any assembly or tool, which is suited to monitor acoustic signals in a wellbore. In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, eachsonde 120 of theborehole monitoring assembly 10 may be a similar sensor to the sonde that is described in U.S. Patent No. 6,170,601. -
Fig. 2 depicts an exemplary embodiment of thesonde 120 in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. In general, thesonde 120 includes a tool body 124, which has acavity 130 in an opening in the wall of the tool body 124. Thecavity 130 receives an acousticenergy sensor package 140, which is positioned in thecavity 130 and is mounted on resilient mounts 150 (springs, for example) to press theacoustic sensor package 140 against the borehole wall (orcasing string 22, if the well is cased), yet isolate thesensors 160 of thepackage 140 from fluid-conveyed pressure disturbances. Thesonde 120 may include three of thesensors 160, each of which senses acoustic energy along a different axis (x, y or z axis). Referring toFig. 2 in conjunction withFig. 1 , thesonde 120 may also include anarm 136 that is activated to press thesonde 120 against the borehole wall (orcasing string 22, if the well 10 is cased) for purposes of placing thesensors 160 in proximity to the wellbore orcasing string 22. - Referring back to
Fig. 1 , as noted above, thewell 8 may be cased (via the casing string 22) or uncased, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. If installed, thecasing string 22 may extend from the surface along the entire length of a wellbore.20, or only along a portion of the wellbore 20. Furthermore, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the wellbore 20 in which theborehole assembly 100 is deployed may be a deviated or lateral wellbore. In some embodiments in a deviated or lateral wellbore, a tractor may be used to deploy theborehole assembly 100. Furthermore, the well 10 may be a subterranean or a subsea well, depending on the particular embodiment of the invention. Thus, many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims. - In the state of the well that is depicted in
Fig. 1 , thewell 8 has been perforated in a previous trip by a perforating gun to form corresponding perforations in thecasing string 22 andcorresponding perforation tunnels 61, which extend into the formation ofinterest 60. - The
borehole assembly 100 is deployed in thewell 8 for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of the fracturing. Such hydraulic fracturing may be desired or performed for a variety of purposes, such as but not limited to increasing or improving hydrocarbon recovery from the formation ofinterest 60 or injecting fluid, such as water, produced water, enhanced oil recovery fluids, or gas into formation ofinterest 60. The term fracturing fluid as used herein includes any fluid injected for the purposes of fracturing the formation and includes but is not limited to treatment fluids, enhanced recovery fluids, and disposal fluids. There is shown inFig. 1 only one subterranean formation ofinterest 60 for the purposes of illustration. It is contemplated that there may be multiple subterranean formations ofinterest 60 in any wellbore 20; and these multiple formations may be hydraulically fractured separately, together, or in various combinations as the operator so desires. -
Isolation device 50 is also deployed into the wellbore on a string 30, as part of theborehole assembly 100. More specifically, theisolation device 50 may be positioned along the string 30 above theborehole monitoring assembly 10. - The
sensors 160 form an array of sensors and may be selected from any appropriate sensing devices such as geophones, hydrophones, or accelerometers, and various combinations that generate signals in response to received acoustic energy. Any one type of acoustic energy sensor or a combination of types may be used. The acoustic energy sensor or sensors should have good sensitivity to acoustic energy in the microseismic frequency band greater than 30 Hz. This band may extend as high as 4 kiloHertz (kHz), as an example. - More than one acoustic energy sensor may be used in combination with other acoustic sensors to form an acoustic energy sensor package. Embodiments may comprise a plurality of tri-axial (3 orthogonal) geophones to provide sensing capabilities in three directions. Such acoustic sensor packages may be spaced at desired intervals (e.g. 15.24 meters (50 ft)) along the wellbore 20. Acoustic sensor packages may be coupled to the wellbore wall or casing 22 via an anchoring system for borehole seismic tools.
- The signals that are generated by each of the
sensors 160 in response to acoustical energy are digitized and transmitted through thecommunication line 40 to thesurface acquisition system 80, at the surface of thewell 8. Thesensors 160 may provide a digital or optical signal directly to thecommunication line 40 or a converter may be used to convert the acoustic signals received by the sensors to digital or optical signals for transmission. In some embodiments, thesurface acquisition system 80 may employ methods, such as digital filters, to remove noise from the hydraulic fracturing pumping operations from the generated signals. In some embodiments, the signals generated by each sensor are recorded in one or more memory devices that may be part of theborehole monitoring assembly 10, the memory devices generally being recoverable with thebottomhole monitoring assembly 10. In such embodiments using memory devices, the signals may also be transmitted via thecommunication line 40, while in other embodiments the signals are not also transmitted via a communication line, as the sensor data that is stored in the memory devices may be retrieved after theborehole assembly 100 is retrieved from the well. - As depicted in
Fig. 1 , theborehole monitoring assembly 10 and theacoustic energy sensors 160 thereof are positioned in the wellbore at a location that is not adjacent to the formation ofinterest 60. Theborehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned below the formation ofinterest 60. In the event that the wellbore is cased,borehole monitoring assembly 10 may be positioned in the wellbore in a location that it not adjacent to the perforated zone in the casing. Theborehole monitoring assembly 10 may be placed below the perforated zone and thus, as depicted inFig. 1 , thesondes 120 may be suspend from a cable from a tubular body that is mounted to theisolation device 50 and forms the lower end of the string 30. Theisolation device 50 is deployed in the wellbore 20 to separate theborehole monitoring assembly 10 from the subterranean formation ofinterest 60. In this manner, theborehole monitoring assembly 10 is isolated from hydraulic fracturing or injection activity undertaken in subterranean formation ofinterest 60. - In some embodiments of the invention, a noise suppression device or devices such as a shock absorber may be provided, being placed between
isolation device 50 andborehole monitoring assembly 10. In some embodiments, noise suppression methods, such as slacking the connecting cable between components, may be used to reduce the possibility of noise transmission. Noise suppression devices or methods similarly may be used between thesensors 160 in an array. In some embodiments of the invention, noise suppression may be performed by digitally processing the signals generated by the measurements made by the acoustic energy sensors. -
Borehole assembly 100 may also include apparatuses or features for use in the hydraulic fracturing process. In the event that conveyance 30 is coiled tubing, one such apparatus may be a jettingnozzle 86 that is placed above theisolation device 50 to permit fluids to be pumped down the string 30 and out the jettingnozzle 86 to clean out debris such as sand that may accumulate above the packer 30. The jettingnozzle 86 may also be used for purposes of perforating thecasing string 22 and forming theperforation tunnels 61 in lieu of a perforating gun. In this regard, an abrasive fluid may be communicated downhole through the central passageway of the string 30, and the abrasive fluid is radially directed by the jettingnozzles 86 toward thecasing string 22 so that the resultant jets perforate thecasing string 22 and form tunnels into the surrounding formation. - The
borehole assembly 100 may include a feature such as a clean-out port, which may be selectively opened or closed and located aboveisolation device 50 to permit, if desired, fluid pumped down the annulus to reverse flow the fluid up coiled tubing. Methods such as ball drops or mechanical actuation may be used to selectively open or close a clean-out port. - In some embodiments,
borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional isolation devices located aboveborehole monitoring assembly 10. Additional isolation devices may be single or multi-set. - The
borehole assembly 100 may include one or more additional devices to provide wellbore information. For example, theborehole assembly 100 may further include a pressure or temperature sensor or both. In some embodiments of the invention, a gyroscope may be provided for use in orientating thesensors 160 or for determining the orientation of theborehole monitoring assembly 10 to permit subsequent data adjustment. Alternatively the sensors may be orientated by methods such as a three component hodogram analysis that uses the recording of a calibration shot in a nearby well or at the surface. By recording and analyzing one or more such shots the tool orientation may by calculated by the known methods such as using plane geometry and the assumption of a straight ray from source to receiver, projecting the ray onto a perpendicular plane and rotating the projection through the horizontal polarization angle to give the direction of the x-component sensor and the relative bearing angle or the method of calculating the relative bearing angle from the 3C polarization of the direct P-wave arrival as described in Becquey, M. and Dubesset, M., 1990, Three-component sonde orientation in a deviated swell (short note): Geophysics, Society of Exploration. Geophyics, 55, 1386-1388. - In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the
borehole assembly 100 may include other devices, which are directed to other functions. For example, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, theborehole assembly 100 may include a casing collar locator (CCL) 87 that is used for purposes of precisely locating theborehole assembly 100 downhole or other tool. In this regard, theCCL 87 may be a magnetically-sensitive device that generates a signal (observed at the surface of the well 8) for purposes of detecting casing joints of thecasing 22 for purposes of precisely locating theassembly 100. This may be helpful for purposes of precisely locating the jettingnozzles 86 when the jettingnozzles 86 perforate thecasing 22 and the formation ofinterest 60. As another example of another potential device of theborehole assembly 100, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, theassembly 100 may include atension sub 85, which is located below theisolation device 50 and is used to monitor the tension of the cable, which extends to thesondes 120. In this regard, should the cable orsondes 120 become lodged in thewell 8, the corresponding tension indicative of this event is sensed by thetension sub 85 and communicated to the surface of the well. Therefore, corrective measures may then be undertaken for purposes of safely dislodging thesondes 120. - As another example, the borehole assembly may include a supplemental sensor, for example a pressure or temperature sensor, capable of providing a downhole measurement. In this regard, the measurement obtained using the supplemental sensor may be used in conjunction with or separately from the measurements obtained using
sensors 160 to monitor hydraulic fracturing. In some embodiments, the supplemental sensor may be an additional acoustic sensor, such as a hydrophone, useful for measuring noise in the form of borehole acoustic waves. The supplemental sensor may be an accelerometer. In some embodiments, a plurality of supplemental sensors, specifically acoustic sensors, may be provided. Output from this supplemental sensor may be used to digitally suppress or remove noise by processing the measurements from the acoustic sensor(s). This use is different from the use of measurements from acoustic sensors in an array to eliminate noise by cumulative processing of the measurements such as known for vertical seismic profiles. - The
borehole assembly 100 may also include, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, a remotely-actuated latch, orconnector 89, for purposes of selectively connecting theborehole assembly 100 to and releasing theassembly 100 from the string 30 (thereby leaving theassembly 100 downhole) when multiple zones are treated, as further described below. Thus; many variations are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims. - The hydraulic fracturing and monitoring may proceed as follows in accordance with some embodiments of the invention. The wellbore 20 is first completed with the
casing 22, and then, thecasing 22 is perforated at one or more subterranean formations ofinterest 60. In accordance with embodiments of the invention, theborehole monitoring assembly 10 may then be conveyed into the wellbore 20 on the string 30. Theisolation device 50 is simultaneously conveyed in wellbore 20 on the string 30 at a desired position aboveassembly 10. Theisolation device 50 is set in place to provide a seal in the annulus between the string 30 and thecasing 22, thereby isolatingborehole monitoring assembly 10 in wellbore 20 belowisolation device 50. If additional isolation devices are provided, they may be actuated or set in place to provide further isolation between theborehole monitoring assembly 10 and theisolation device 50. - Hydraulic fracturing fluid or injection fluid is then pumped at pressure down the annulus formed between conveyance 30 and
casing 22 or wellbore wall and into the subterranean formation ofinterest 60. The hydraulic fracturing fluid may be any fluid useful for fracturing a subterranean formation, including but not limited to wellbore treatment fluids, hydrocarbons, water, produced water, disposal water, foamed fluids or gases, such as natural gas or CO2. - The
isolation device 50 and if provided, additional isolation device or devices, separateborehole monitoring assembly 10 from hydraulic fracturing fluids and operations performed in the wellbore aboveisolation device 50.Isolation device 50 may be any packer, inflatable or mechanical device capable of being set and released that provides sufficient sealing pressure within the wellbore to isolate the borehole monitoring assembly from the pressured hydraulic fracturing or injection fluid. In embodiments of the invention where theborehole monitoring assembly 10 is deployed in the wellbore below theisolation device 50, theisolation device 50 includes feed-throughs to permitcommunication line 40 to pass through theisolation device 50 and to borehole monitoringassembly 10. Some embodiments may include stiff bridles or deployment bars for use in deployingborehole sensor assembly 10 in deviated, horizontal or pressurized wells. - In accordance with embodiments of the invention described herein, referring to
Fig. 3 , atechnique 200 may be used to monitor the hydraulic fracturing of a particular formation of interest. Pursuant to thetechnique 200, theborehole assembly 100 is run into the well into position, pursuant to block 204, the borehole assembly comprising an acoustic sensor. A hydraulic fracturing operation is then performed by pumping fracturing fluid into the wellbore at pressure, pursuant to block 206. The one or more acoustic sensors are used to monitor acoustic energy pursuant to block 208. The acoustic energy monitored may be from fracturing operations, or may result from fracturing operations in which the hydraulic fracturing fluid comprises an acoustic signal generating element, such as a noisy proppant described inU.S. Pat. No. 7,134,492 .Sensor 160 is used to monitor the operation or the signals generated by the acoustic signal generating element. - Although the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of a single formation of interest, or zone, is described herein for purposes of clarifying certain aspects of the invention, it is noted that other embodiments are possible and are within the scope of the appended claims. More specifically, in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, the
borehole assembly 100 may be used in conjunction with the hydraulic fracturing and monitoring of several zones in the well. - In this manner, referring to
Fig. 4 , in accordance with some embodiments of the invention, atechnique 250 includes running (block 254) a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore (block 258). Theborehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well, pursuant to block 262. Next, theisolation device 50 is set (block 266) and a fracturing operation is subsequently performed and thesensors 160 are used to monitor the operation, pursuant to block 270. In some embodiments, a fracturing model may be established and updated using a measurement fromsensor 160. - After the completion of the hydraulic fracturing operation, a determination is made (diamond 274) whether another zone is to be fractured. If not, then the
borehole assembly 100 is pulled out of the well, pursuant to block 278. If another zone is to be fractured, then the next zone is perforated, pursuant to block 254; and pursuant toblocks - Thus, pursuant to the
technique 250, zones may be fractured and monitored in the well as set forth inFig. 4 . It is noted that thetechnique 250 is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention. - In accordance with some embodiments of the invention, a technique includes running a perforating device downhole in a well to a particular depth. The perforating device is then used to perforate the casing or wellbore. The
borehole assembly 100 is positioned in the well. In some embodiments,borehole assembly 100 may comprise the perforating device. A fracturing operation is subsequently performed and thesensors 160 are used to monitor the operation. - After the completion of the hydraulic fracturing operation, a determination is made whether another zone is to be fractured. If not, then the
borehole assembly 100 is pulled out of the well. If another zone is to be fractured, then the perforated next zone is perforated; and another zone is hydraulically fractured and monitored. - Thus, pursuant to the technique, zones may be fractured and monitored in the well. It is noted that the technique is provided for purposes of an example, as other techniques may be used for purposes of hydraulic fracturing and monitoring, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
- The
borehole monitoring assembly 100 and techniques that are described herein may offer one or more advantages and/or improvements over conventional hydraulic monitoring techniques and devices. In particular, placement of the borehole monitoring assembly in the injection well rather than a separate monitoring well reduces the time and expense required for drilling a separate well. Placing the acoustical sensors below the packer isolates the sensors from the fracturing fluid and reduces the risk of damage to the sensors from the fracturing fluid as it is pumped down the wellbore. Similarly, placingcommunication line 40 within the string 30 isolates it from the fracturing fluid pumped down the annulus and significantly reduces the possibility of erosion or damage to the communication line. Furthermore, the placement ofsensors 160 below theisolation device 50 has the effect of providing isolation from flow-induced noise. - Prior to the present invention, noise generated by pumping fracturing fluid in a wellbore has inhibited the ability to make successful microseismic measurements in the injection well. Several elements are used individually or in combination in the present invention to isolate and attenuate wellbore noise. Placing the acoustic energy sensor or sensors below the
isolation device 50 provides a barrier to direct flow noise.Isolation device 50 is designed to efficiently allow setting/unsetting, cleaning of sand deposited on top, and enablement of noise isolation techniques (e.g., slacking). Configuringsensors 160 in an acoustic energy sensor package and mechanically isolating the sensor package 140 (seeFig. 2 ) from the tool body 124 may be used to attenuate noise (known as tubewaves) propagating in the wellbore fluid. Slackingcommunication line 40 may be used to attenuate noise propagating along thecommunication line 40 orborehole monitoring assembly 10.Isolation device 50 may comprise a compressional setting that is operational on a downward movement that accommodates slacking ofcommunication line 40. - Shock absorbers designed to attenuate noise propagating in the bottomhole-assembly may be inserted between
isolation device 50 and the acoustic sensors. Digital filtering may be used to identify upward and downward propagating noise with distinctly different characteristics from the microseisms. Such digital filtering techniques such as adaptive beamforming or velocity filtering may be used to attenuate noise. A sub-array of hydrophones placed within an array of geophones or accelerometers may be useful for identifying and removing propagating fluid (tube) waves. Additionally, pumping noise is at low frequencies (<20Hz) much below the typical microseismic band and may be substantially removed by conventional high-pass filters. - The
borehole assembly 100 may further include other measurement devices such as pressure, temperature, gyroscopes, or any other device useful for measuring indications of fracture characteristics. Theborehole assembly 100 may also include fracturing tools positioned above theisolation device 50 for use in the hydraulic fracturing process, such as jetting nozzle, clean-up port, etc. Furthermore, theborehole assembly 100 may include a single or multi-set isolation devise above the measurement devises to protect it from the impact of the fracture treatment. - Although directional and terms of orientation, such as "vertical," "up," "down," etc. have been used for reasons of convenience in the foregoing description, it is understood that such directions and orientations are not necessary to practice the invention. For example, in accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the
borehole assembly 100 may be used in a lateral wellbore. Therefore, many variations are contemplated and are within the scope of the appended claims. - While the present invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate numerous modifications and variations therefrom. It is intended that the appended claims cover all such modifications and variations as fall within the scope of this present invention.
Claims (22)
- Apparatus for monitoring a hydraulic fracturing operation in a wellbore (20) performed by injecting a fracturing fluid from the wellbore into a formation (60) surrounding the wellbore, the apparatus comprising:a tool body (120); andat least one acoustic energy sensor (160) disposed on the tool body (120) and configured to monitor the fracturing operation by measuring acoustical energy generated during the fracturing operation;the apparatus characterized by an isolation device (50) configured to be positioned below the formation to be fractured and above the at least one acoustic energy sensor to isolate the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) from the pressure and flow of the fracturing fluid and characterized in that the at least one acoustic sensor is configured to be pressed against the wall of the wellbore while monitoring the fracturing operation.
- The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) comprises at least one of a geophone, hydrophone and accelerometer.
- The apparatus of claim 1 or claim 2, further comprising a string (30) to convey the isolation device (50) and said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) downhole as a unit.
- The apparatus of any one of the claims 1 to 3, further comprising a remotely-activated connector to selectively connect the isolation device (50) to a tubular string (30).
- The apparatus of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the isolation device (50) comprises a packer (50).
- The apparatus of any one of claims 1 to 5, further comprising a memory connected to and deployed a downhole with the tool body (120) to store data provided by said at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) such that the data is retrieved from the memory after the apparatus (10) is retrieved from the well.
- The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the isolation device (50), the tool body (120) and the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) form part of an assembly (100) which is connected to a coiled tubing (30) having a communication line (40) disposed therein.
- The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising means (80) to process data from the at least one acoustical energy sensor (160).
- A method of monitoring a hydraulic fracturing operation, the method comprising:deploying a borehole assembly (100) into a wellbore (20), the borehole assembly comprising a borehole monitoring assembly (10) having at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) for monitoring the fracturing operation by using the at least one sensor (160) to measure acoustical energy generated during the fracturing operation; andinjecting a fracturing fluid under pressure from the borehole into a formation (60) surrounding the borehole to hydraulically fracture the formation;characterized by setting an isolation device (50) at a position below the formation (60) and above the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) to isolate the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) from the pressure and flow of the fracturing fluid, and effecting the monitoring by pressing the at least one acoustic energy sensor (160) against the wall of the borehole.
- The method of claim 9, wherein the borehole assembly further comprises a supplemental sensor.
- The method of claim 9 or 10, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises an acoustical energy generating element.
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 11, wherein the fracturing fluid comprises a noisy proppant.
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 12, further comprising the step of moving the borehole assembly 100 in the wellbore 20, and repeating the setting, injecting and monitoring steps
- The method of claim 10, wherein the supplemental sensor is an acoustic energy sensor (160).
- The method of claim 14, further comprising the step of using the output from the supplemental sensor in processing the measurement of acoustic energy.
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 15, further comprising orientating the borehole assembly (100) in the borehole (20).
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 16, wherein the isolating comprises setting a packer (50).
- The method of claim 17, further comprising:releasing the packer (50);repositioning the borehole assembly (100) in the wellbore (20); andrepeating the isolating and injecting steps.
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 18, wherein the deploying comprises deploying the assembly (100) on a string (30), the method further comprising disposing a communication line (40) inside the string (30) to establish communication between said at least one sensor 160 and a surface acquisition system (80).
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 19, comprising providing a plurality of the sensors (160), the method further comprising spacing the sensors (160) along the wellbore (20).
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 20, further comprising retrieving the assembly (100) from the wellbore (20).
- The method of any one of claims 9 to 21, further comprising storing data indicative of the acoustical energy measured by said at least one sensor (160) in a memory of the assembly (100), and retrieving the data from the memory after the assembly (100) is retrieved from the borehole (20).
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL07735094T PL1996792T3 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2007-03-13 | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US78216106P | 2006-03-14 | 2006-03-14 | |
US11/617,372 US20070215345A1 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2006-12-28 | Method And Apparatus For Hydraulic Fracturing And Monitoring |
PCT/IB2007/050843 WO2007105167A2 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2007-03-13 | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1996792A2 EP1996792A2 (en) | 2008-12-03 |
EP1996792B1 true EP1996792B1 (en) | 2011-12-28 |
Family
ID=38349429
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07735094A Active EP1996792B1 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2007-03-13 | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20070215345A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1996792B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101460703B (en) |
AT (1) | ATE539232T1 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0708792A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2645351A1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA013610B1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2008011685A (en) |
PL (1) | PL1996792T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007105167A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016044026A1 (en) * | 2014-09-18 | 2016-03-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system for hydraulic fracture diagnosis with the use of a coiled tubing dual isolation service tool |
Families Citing this family (97)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9500058B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2016-11-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Coiled tubing tractor assembly |
US7617873B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2009-11-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | System and methods using fiber optics in coiled tubing |
KR100925266B1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2009-11-05 | 한국지질자원연구원 | Apparatus for measuring in-situ stress of rock using thermal crack |
WO2008057398A2 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2008-05-15 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fracturing monitoring within a treatment well |
US9477002B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2016-10-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Microhydraulic fracturing with downhole acoustic measurement |
US8607864B2 (en) * | 2008-02-28 | 2013-12-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Live bottom hole pressure for perforation/fracturing operations |
GB2459457B (en) * | 2008-04-22 | 2012-05-09 | Swelltec Ltd | Downhole apparatus and method |
EA022413B1 (en) * | 2008-05-20 | 2015-12-30 | Оксан Материалз, Инк. | Method of use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries |
CN101434836B (en) * | 2008-12-12 | 2010-12-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司 | Continuous mixing method for fracturing fluid |
US8490693B2 (en) * | 2009-02-17 | 2013-07-23 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Determining fracture orientation using wellbore acoustic radial profiles |
GB2511657B (en) * | 2009-05-27 | 2014-12-31 | Optasense Holdings Ltd | Fracture monitoring |
US8655104B2 (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2014-02-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cyclic noise removal in borehole imaging |
US8682102B2 (en) * | 2009-06-18 | 2014-03-25 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Cyclic noise removal in borehole imaging |
US8437962B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2013-05-07 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Generating probabilistic information on subterranean fractures |
US8886502B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2014-11-11 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Simulating injection treatments from multiple wells |
US9176245B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2015-11-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Refining information on subterranean fractures |
US8386226B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2013-02-26 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Probabilistic simulation of subterranean fracture propagation |
US8898044B2 (en) | 2009-11-25 | 2014-11-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Simulating subterranean fracture propagation |
US8392165B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2013-03-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Probabilistic earth model for subterranean fracture simulation |
CN101818633B (en) * | 2010-01-18 | 2012-11-14 | 大庆福斯特科技开发有限公司 | Downhole closing well technology of replacing tubing after deep horizontal gas well open hole staged fracturing |
US9069099B2 (en) * | 2010-02-02 | 2015-06-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for monitoring acoustic activity in a subsurface formation |
US8960313B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2015-02-24 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Packer deployed formation sensor |
US8511400B2 (en) * | 2010-04-05 | 2013-08-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for acoustic measurements while using a coring tool |
BR112013017767A2 (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2016-10-11 | Maurice B Dusseault | multi-stage injection process for improved shale feature production |
CN103270241B (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2017-01-18 | 尼克森能源无限责任公司 | High pressure hydrocarbon fracturing on demand method and related process |
US10001003B2 (en) * | 2010-12-22 | 2018-06-19 | Maurice B. Dusseault | Multl-stage fracture injection process for enhanced resource production from shales |
AU2012271016B2 (en) * | 2011-06-13 | 2014-12-04 | Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. | Hydraulic fracture monitoring using active seismic sources with receivers in the treatment well |
US9945970B1 (en) * | 2011-08-29 | 2018-04-17 | Seismic Innovations | Method and apparatus for modeling microseismic event location estimate accuracy |
US11774616B2 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2023-10-03 | Seismic Innovations | Method and system for microseismic event location error analysis and display |
US9140102B2 (en) * | 2011-10-09 | 2015-09-22 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | System for real-time monitoring and transmitting hydraulic fracture seismic events to surface using the pilot hole of the treatment well as the monitoring well |
US8800652B2 (en) | 2011-10-09 | 2014-08-12 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method for real-time monitoring and transmitting hydraulic fracture seismic events to surface using the pilot hole of the treatment well as the monitoring well |
CN102518426A (en) * | 2011-12-31 | 2012-06-27 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司长庆井下技术作业公司 | Hydrofracture bottom-hole pressure monitoring process |
US9316098B2 (en) | 2012-01-26 | 2016-04-19 | Expansion Energy Llc | Non-hydraulic fracturing and cold foam proppant delivery systems, methods, and processes |
US8342246B2 (en) * | 2012-01-26 | 2013-01-01 | Expansion Energy, Llc | Fracturing systems and methods utilyzing metacritical phase natural gas |
US20150003199A1 (en) * | 2012-01-26 | 2015-01-01 | Bernard Widrow | Methods and apparatus for determining stimulated volume of oil and gas reservoirs |
US20130194892A1 (en) * | 2012-01-29 | 2013-08-01 | Daniel Golparian | Autonomous System for Hydrofracture Monitoring |
US9201157B2 (en) * | 2012-04-26 | 2015-12-01 | Farrokh Mohamadi | Monitoring of wells to detect the composition of matter in boreholes and propped fractures |
CA2872944C (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2022-08-09 | Packers Plus Energy Services Inc. | Method and system for monitoring well operations |
US9739139B2 (en) | 2012-05-18 | 2017-08-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Intervention operations with high rate telemetry |
CN102828741A (en) * | 2012-05-21 | 2012-12-19 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | Filtering method and device for positioning of rotating magnetic field of horizontal well |
CN104131799A (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2014-11-05 | 梁红 | Artesian well sealing and blocking device |
CN104215934B (en) * | 2013-06-05 | 2016-09-07 | 中国石油天然气集团公司 | A kind of method utilizing uphole geophone to carry out fracturing micro-seismic monitoring |
US20150075784A1 (en) * | 2013-09-19 | 2015-03-19 | Shell Oil Company | Phased stimulation methods |
US20160250812A1 (en) * | 2013-10-14 | 2016-09-01 | United Technologies Corporation | Automated laminate composite solid ply generation |
US9217808B2 (en) * | 2013-11-07 | 2015-12-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Wellbore signal monitor with tangential seismic sensors for tube-wave noise reduction |
WO2015094159A1 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2015-06-25 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Systems and methods for increasing fracture complexity using acoustic energy |
CA2934109C (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2022-03-08 | Hifi Engineering Inc. | Sound baffle device and system for detecting acoustic signals |
CA2925716C (en) * | 2013-12-31 | 2018-05-22 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Rotating sensor mechanism for seismic while drilling sensors |
US9683435B2 (en) | 2014-03-04 | 2017-06-20 | General Electric Company | Sensor deployment system for a wellbore and methods of assembling the same |
WO2015153537A1 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2015-10-08 | Schlumberger Canada Limited | Systems, methods and apparatus for downhole monitoring |
WO2015187153A1 (en) * | 2014-06-04 | 2015-12-10 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fracture treatment analysis based on seismic reflection data |
US10001613B2 (en) * | 2014-07-22 | 2018-06-19 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and cables for use in fracturing zones in a well |
US10738577B2 (en) | 2014-07-22 | 2020-08-11 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and cables for use in fracturing zones in a well |
US10392916B2 (en) | 2014-08-22 | 2019-08-27 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | System and method for using pressure pulses for fracture stimulation performance enhancement and evaluation |
TWI629456B (en) * | 2014-12-01 | 2018-07-11 | 財團法人國家實驗研究院 | Environment monitoring system and vibration sensing device |
US10060242B2 (en) | 2014-12-05 | 2018-08-28 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Traceable metal-organic frameworks for use in subterranean formations |
US10062202B2 (en) | 2014-12-22 | 2018-08-28 | General Electric Company | System and methods of generating a computer model of a composite component |
US10253598B2 (en) * | 2015-05-07 | 2019-04-09 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Diagnostic lateral wellbores and methods of use |
WO2017039605A1 (en) * | 2015-08-31 | 2017-03-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and systems employing a flow prediction model that is a function of perforation cluster geometry, fluid characteristics, and acoustic activity |
GB2558810A (en) | 2015-10-09 | 2018-07-18 | Darkvision Tech Inc | Devices and methods for imaging wells using phased array ultrasound |
US10151186B2 (en) | 2015-11-05 | 2018-12-11 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Triggering an exothermic reaction for reservoirs using microwaves |
EP3371411B1 (en) | 2015-11-05 | 2021-02-17 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and apparatus for spatially-oriented chemically-induced pulsed fracturing in reservoirs |
CN105525916B (en) * | 2016-01-07 | 2018-05-25 | 陕西师范大学 | A kind of active noise fracturing effect detection method |
US10619470B2 (en) * | 2016-01-13 | 2020-04-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | High-pressure jetting and data communication during subterranean perforation operations |
AU2017246521B2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2023-02-02 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
BR112018070565A2 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2019-02-12 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | downhole event detection using acoustic frequency domain characteristics |
BR112018075500B1 (en) * | 2016-06-24 | 2023-04-11 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | INSULATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INSULATING A LOWER COMPLETION |
CN105927266B (en) * | 2016-07-01 | 2018-05-08 | 山东唐口煤业有限公司 | A kind of high-pressure hydraulic fracturing water injection system for coal seams and the automatically-monitored method of water filling |
US10598011B2 (en) | 2016-08-15 | 2020-03-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Segmented wireless production logging |
WO2018052491A1 (en) * | 2016-08-18 | 2018-03-22 | Seismos, Inc. | Method for evaluating and monitoring formation fracture treatment using fluid pressure waves |
US11060387B2 (en) * | 2017-01-18 | 2021-07-13 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Determining fluid allocation in a well with a distributed temperature sensing system using data from a distributed acoustic sensing system |
US11365626B2 (en) | 2017-03-01 | 2022-06-21 | Proptester, Inc. | Fluid flow testing apparatus and methods |
US10612356B2 (en) | 2017-03-01 | 2020-04-07 | Proptester, Inc. | Fracture fluid and proppant transport testing systems and methods of using same |
US11215044B2 (en) | 2017-03-03 | 2022-01-04 | Cold Bore Technology Inc. | Adaptive noise reduction for event monitoring during hydraulic fracturing operations |
CA3058256C (en) | 2017-03-31 | 2023-09-12 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Well and overburden monitoring using distributed acoustic sensors |
AU2018321150A1 (en) | 2017-08-23 | 2020-03-12 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Detecting downhole sand ingress locations |
CN111771042A (en) | 2017-10-11 | 2020-10-13 | 英国石油勘探运作有限公司 | Detecting events using acoustic frequency domain features |
CN109931042B (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2022-03-01 | 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 | Directional hydraulic sand-blasting perforation fracturing device and method |
CN109025939B (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2019-11-12 | 中国石油大学(北京) | Ultrasonic tight oil imbibition test device |
CA3053791A1 (en) | 2018-09-04 | 2020-03-04 | High-Definition Seismic Corporation | Borehole seismic sensor array and associated methods |
AU2019389281A1 (en) | 2018-11-29 | 2021-06-17 | Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited | Das data processing to identify fluid inflow locations and fluid type |
GB201820331D0 (en) | 2018-12-13 | 2019-01-30 | Bp Exploration Operating Co Ltd | Distributed acoustic sensing autocalibration |
US11111781B2 (en) * | 2019-02-20 | 2021-09-07 | Tubel Llc | Instrumenting unconventional wells for real time in situ frac height determination, reservoir fluid movement, production monitoring and well integrity in fractured stages |
CN109973051B (en) * | 2019-04-11 | 2019-12-06 | 中国地质科学院地质力学研究所 | high-pressure water conversion control device and stress measurement system |
CN109899050A (en) * | 2019-04-15 | 2019-06-18 | 武汉理工大学 | Form the bed gas reservoir fracturing process of complex fracture network |
WO2021052602A1 (en) | 2019-09-20 | 2021-03-25 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for sand ingress prediction for subterranean wellbores |
EP4045766A1 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2022-08-24 | Lytt Limited | Fluid inflow characterization using hybrid das/dts measurements |
CA3154435C (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2023-03-28 | Lytt Limited | Inflow detection using dts features |
WO2021093974A1 (en) | 2019-11-15 | 2021-05-20 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for draw down improvements across wellbores |
CN111350496A (en) * | 2020-03-19 | 2020-06-30 | 西安石油大学 | System and method for fracture characterization in underground hydraulic fracturing process |
EP4491845A2 (en) | 2020-06-11 | 2025-01-15 | Lytt Limited | Systems and methods for monitoring fluid outflow flow along a wellbore |
CA3182376A1 (en) | 2020-06-18 | 2021-12-23 | Cagri CERRAHOGLU | Event model training using in situ data |
CN112112619A (en) * | 2020-09-16 | 2020-12-22 | 贵州大学 | A method and equipment for hydraulic fracturing of rock formation in shale gas wells |
CN112268642A (en) * | 2020-11-24 | 2021-01-26 | 中油奥博(成都)科技有限公司 | Underground stress measuring device and method based on distributed optical fiber sensing |
RU2758263C1 (en) * | 2020-12-05 | 2021-10-27 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «Сигма» | Method for seismic monitoring of hydraulic fracturing processes in development of hydrocarbon deposits and heat impact processes in development of high-viscosity hydrocarbons |
US11474270B2 (en) | 2021-01-04 | 2022-10-18 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Three-component seismic data acquisition while fracking |
CN114542071A (en) * | 2022-04-08 | 2022-05-27 | 山东科技大学 | Coal seam water injection system based on the integration of fracturing and ultrasonic excitation and its operation method |
Family Cites Families (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4328705A (en) * | 1980-08-11 | 1982-05-11 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method of determining characteristics of a fluid producing underground formation |
US4442895A (en) * | 1982-09-07 | 1984-04-17 | S-Cubed | Method of hydrofracture in underground formations |
FR2600172B1 (en) * | 1986-01-17 | 1988-08-26 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | DEVICE FOR INSTALLING SEISMIC SENSORS IN A PETROLEUM PRODUCTION WELL |
US4731531A (en) * | 1986-01-29 | 1988-03-15 | Halliburton Company | Method of logging a well using a non-radioactive material irradiated into an isotope exhibiting a detectable characteristic |
US4832121A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1989-05-23 | The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York | Methods for monitoring temperature-vs-depth characteristics in a borehole during and after hydraulic fracture treatments |
US4926940A (en) * | 1988-09-06 | 1990-05-22 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for monitoring the hydraulic fracturing of a subsurface formation |
US5076392A (en) * | 1988-09-28 | 1991-12-31 | Koenig Arthur S | Method and apparatus for forcing a member through material such as soil and obtaining samples therefrom |
GB9026703D0 (en) * | 1990-12-07 | 1991-01-23 | Schlumberger Ltd | Downhole measurement using very short fractures |
FR2673672B1 (en) * | 1991-03-08 | 1993-06-04 | Inst Francais Du Petrole | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PLACING PROBES AGAINST THE WALL OF A WELL. |
US5353637A (en) * | 1992-06-09 | 1994-10-11 | Plumb Richard A | Methods and apparatus for borehole measurement of formation stress |
US5413179A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1995-05-09 | The Energex Company | System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment |
US5322126A (en) * | 1993-04-16 | 1994-06-21 | The Energex Company | System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment |
US5771170A (en) * | 1994-02-14 | 1998-06-23 | Atlantic Richfield Company | System and program for locating seismic events during earth fracture propagation |
US6006832A (en) * | 1995-02-09 | 1999-12-28 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system for monitoring and controlling production and injection wells having permanent downhole formation evaluation sensors |
US5829520A (en) * | 1995-02-14 | 1998-11-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for testing, completion and/or maintaining wellbores using a sensor device |
US5503225A (en) * | 1995-04-21 | 1996-04-02 | Atlantic Richfield Company | System and method for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations |
US5524709A (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1996-06-11 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore |
US5607015A (en) * | 1995-07-20 | 1997-03-04 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Method and apparatus for installing acoustic sensors in a wellbore |
US5996726A (en) * | 1998-01-29 | 1999-12-07 | Gas Research Institute | System and method for determining the distribution and orientation of natural fractures |
AU7927598A (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2000-02-01 | Nakajima, Hiroshi | Borehole seismic tool |
US6446727B1 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2002-09-10 | Sclumberger Technology Corporation | Process for hydraulically fracturing oil and gas wells |
US6552665B1 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2003-04-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Telemetry system for borehole logging tools |
US20030218939A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-11-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Deployment of downhole seismic sensors for microfracture detection |
US6935424B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2005-08-30 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Mitigating risk by using fracture mapping to alter formation fracturing process |
US7134492B2 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2006-11-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Mapping fracture dimensions |
US6985816B2 (en) * | 2003-09-15 | 2006-01-10 | Pinnacle Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for determining the orientation of natural fractures |
US7543635B2 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2009-06-09 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Fracture characterization using reservoir monitoring devices |
-
2006
- 2006-12-28 US US11/617,372 patent/US20070215345A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-03-13 AT AT07735094T patent/ATE539232T1/en active
- 2007-03-13 MX MX2008011685A patent/MX2008011685A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2007-03-13 WO PCT/IB2007/050843 patent/WO2007105167A2/en active Application Filing
- 2007-03-13 CA CA002645351A patent/CA2645351A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2007-03-13 EP EP07735094A patent/EP1996792B1/en active Active
- 2007-03-13 PL PL07735094T patent/PL1996792T3/en unknown
- 2007-03-13 EA EA200870355A patent/EA013610B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2007-03-13 CN CN2007800170392A patent/CN101460703B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-03-13 BR BRPI0708792-6A patent/BRPI0708792A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016044026A1 (en) * | 2014-09-18 | 2016-03-24 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and system for hydraulic fracture diagnosis with the use of a coiled tubing dual isolation service tool |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1996792A2 (en) | 2008-12-03 |
EA200870355A1 (en) | 2009-02-27 |
CA2645351A1 (en) | 2007-09-20 |
MX2008011685A (en) | 2008-10-17 |
CN101460703B (en) | 2013-12-04 |
WO2007105167A3 (en) | 2007-11-15 |
WO2007105167A2 (en) | 2007-09-20 |
US20070215345A1 (en) | 2007-09-20 |
EA013610B1 (en) | 2010-06-30 |
BRPI0708792A2 (en) | 2011-06-14 |
ATE539232T1 (en) | 2012-01-15 |
PL1996792T3 (en) | 2012-05-31 |
CN101460703A (en) | 2009-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1996792B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracturing and monitoring | |
US5503225A (en) | System and method for monitoring the location of fractures in earth formations | |
CA2860566C (en) | Optical fiber well deployment for seismic surveying | |
AU2019220720B2 (en) | Vibration while drilling data processing methods | |
US5524709A (en) | Method for acoustically coupling sensors in a wellbore | |
CA3003709C (en) | Bridge plug sensor for bottom-hole measurements | |
US9069099B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for monitoring acoustic activity in a subsurface formation | |
US20130333879A1 (en) | Method for Closed Loop Fracture Detection and Fracturing using Expansion and Sensing Apparatus | |
US20190203576A1 (en) | Extendable/collapsible apparatus for fracture imaging and use of same | |
US6554065B2 (en) | Memory gravel pack imaging apparatus and method | |
WO2017105434A1 (en) | Mitigation of cable damage during perforation | |
US7063141B2 (en) | Apparatus for agitated fluid discharge | |
WO2017083443A1 (en) | Moving system and method | |
US20120199368A1 (en) | Method and Device for Deploying a Cable and an Apparatus in the Ground | |
US11634973B2 (en) | Dynamic strain detection for cable orientation during perforation operations | |
WO2021126873A1 (en) | Method of monitoring a downhole stimulation operation, downhole device and system for monitoring the downhole operation | |
EP2092373A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for long term seismic monitoring |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20081014 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: MARTINEZ, ALEJANDRO Inventor name: UNDERHILL, WILLIAM Inventor name: LAFFERTY, THEODORE JR. Inventor name: NUTT, LES |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20090427 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 539232 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602007019676 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120308 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120329 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120428 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120430 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 539232 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121001 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602007019676 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120313 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120408 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20111228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120313 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070313 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20150119 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20150209 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150310 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20150224 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150309 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20150115 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602007019676 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160313 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20161130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160331 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160313 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160313 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160313 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240108 Year of fee payment: 18 |