EP1889765A1 - Collision prediction and mitigation method for a vehicle - Google Patents
Collision prediction and mitigation method for a vehicle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1889765A1 EP1889765A1 EP07075676A EP07075676A EP1889765A1 EP 1889765 A1 EP1889765 A1 EP 1889765A1 EP 07075676 A EP07075676 A EP 07075676A EP 07075676 A EP07075676 A EP 07075676A EP 1889765 A1 EP1889765 A1 EP 1889765A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- time
- host vehicle
- collision
- lateral acceleration
- braking
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T7/00—Brake-action initiating means
- B60T7/12—Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger
- B60T7/22—Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger initiated by contact of vehicle, e.g. bumper, with an external object, e.g. another vehicle, or by means of contactless obstacle detectors mounted on the vehicle
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60T—VEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
- B60T2201/00—Particular use of vehicle brake systems; Special systems using also the brakes; Special software modules within the brake system controller
- B60T2201/02—Active or adaptive cruise control system; Distance control
- B60T2201/024—Collision mitigation systems
Definitions
- the present invention relates to collision prediction for a motor vehicle, and more particularly to a prediction and mitigation method that takes into account the dynamic collision avoidance capability of the vehicle.
- the present invention is directed to an improved collision prediction and mitigation method that takes into account the dynamic collision avoidance capability of the vehicle to optimize collision mitigation.
- Estimates of the time-to-brake (TTB) and the time-to-turn (TTT) are compared with the calculated time-to-collision (TTC).
- TTB time-to-brake
- TTT time-to-turn
- TTC time-to-collision
- a collision is deemed to be unavoidable when the smaller of TTB and TTT is greater than TTC.
- the TTT estimate is based in part on a lateral acceleration parameter, and that parameter is initialized to a low value corresponding to initial turning action of the vehicle, and is set incrementally higher than the actual lateral acceleration when the driver initiates evasive turning.
- the TTT and TTB estimates are increased by the time required to pre-charge the vehicle brakes so that pre-charging can be automatically initiated when required to optimize collision mitigation due to braking.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of host and target vehicles
- FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a vehicle collision mitigation method according to the present invention.
- FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C together constitute a flow diagram illustrating the method of the present invention.
- the portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3A determines if a steering solution or a braking solution should be selected; the portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3B describes the steering solution; and the portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3C describes the braking solution.
- the diagram of FIG. 1 depicts a host vehicle 10 and a target vehicle or other obstacle in the forward path of the host vehicle 10.
- the host vehicle 10 is equipped with a system including a radar ranging sensor 14 for carrying out the collision prediction and mitigation method of the present invention.
- the host vehicle 10 is moving in the direction of the target vehicle 12, which may be moving or stationary.
- the ranging sensor 14, which may also be used for other vehicular applications such as adaptive cruise control, provides three parameters of interest: range R, range-rate RR, and lateral offset distance LOD.
- the range and lateral offset distance parameters R and LOD are designated in the illustration of FIG. 1; the range-rate parameter RR is the closing velocity, or the velocity of the host vehicle 10 relative to that of the target vehicle 12.
- the host vehicle 10 is equipped with a vehicle speed sensor and a turning sensor such as a steering wheel angle sensor or a yaw rate sensor.
- TTC time-to-collision
- the driver of the host vehicle 10 can avoid an impending collision with the target vehicle 12 by steering to change the heading of host vehicle 10 and/or by braking the host vehicle.
- the turning sensor and the LOD parameter provided by the ranging sensor 14 allow the host vehicle 10 to determine if the collision can be avoided by steering. This is achieved by computing the time-to-turn, or TTT, and comparing it to TTC.
- the speed VS and the known braking characteristics of the host vehicle 10 allow the host vehicle 10 to determine if the collision can be avoided by braking. This is achieved by computing the time-to-brake, or TTB, and comparing it to TTC.
- the block diagram of FIG. 2 is a simplified representation of the collision prediction and mitigation method carried out by the host vehicle 10 according to this invention.
- the R and RR parameters provided by ranging sensor 14 are supplied to block 16, which calculates time-to-collision TTC according to the quotient R/RR.
- the LOD parameter, the vehicle speed VS and a lateral acceleration parameter LAT_ACC are supplied to block 18, which calculates the time-to-turn TTT. This is achieved by using VS, LAT_ACC and the road coefficient of friction COF to calculate the turning radius R, computing the length of the curved travel path required to negotiate the lateral offset distance LOD, and using the computed travel path length and the range-rate parameter RR to compute the time-to-turn TTT.
- the vehicle speed VS is supplied to block 20, which computes the time-to-brake TTB.
- the block 22 selects the minimum (MIN) of TTT and TTB, and supplies it to block 24 for comparison with TTC. If the smaller of TTT and TTB is greater than TTC, a collision with the target vehicle 12 is deemed to be unavoidable, and activation of the vehicle brakes 26 is automatically initiated to mitigate the severity of the collision.
- the block 28 determines the lateral acceleration parameter LAT_ACC used in determining time-to-turn TTT based on the output of a turning sensor; in the illustrated embodiment, the turning sensor provide a measure of the steering angle SA.
- LAT_ACC is initialized to a low value corresponding to initial turning action of the vehicle, and is increased toward its maximum capability as the turning sensor indicates that the driver has initiated evasive steering.
- FIGS. 3A-3C illustrates the method of this invention in the manner of a high level routine periodically executed by a microprocessor-based controller aboard host vehicle 10.
- the block 42 is executed to calculate the time-to-collision TTC according to the quotient R/RR.
- the block 44 defines a set of three enabling conditions for automatic collision mitigation braking, and the block 46 disables automatic braking if one or more of the conditions are not met.
- the vehicle speed VS must exceed a calibrated minimum speed such as 8 MPH; second, the range-rate RR (i.e., the closing speed) must be less than a calibrated speed such as 5 MPH; and third, the time-to-collision TTC must be less than a calibrated maximum time such as one minute.
- the block 46 disables automatic braking, the blocks 42-44 are re-executed after some dwell period. If the enabling conditions of block 44 are met, the block 48 estimates the lateral acceleration LAT_ACC of the host vehicle 10. As indicated above, LAT_ACC can be estimated based on the measured steering angle SA, in combination with known dynamic characteristics of the host vehicle 10. Alternately, LAT_ACC can be estimated based on a measure of yaw rate, although yaw rate measurements tend to lag rather than lead lateral acceleration of the host vehicle 10 due to steering.
- the blocks 50-54 select the value of a collision mitigation lateral acceleration parameter, CM_LAT_ACC, used to compute the time-to-turn TTT.
- the block 50 compares the absolute value of the estimated lateral acceleration LAT_ACC to a calibrated value MIN_TURN_ACC corresponding to initial turning action of the host vehicle 10.
- MIN_TURN_ACC may have a value of approximately 5.0 m/sec 2 .
- will be less than MIN_TURN_ACC until the driver of host vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver. So long as
- CM_LAT_ACC is maintained at a relatively low value (MIN_TURN_ACC) until the driver of host vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver, and then is set to a value that is incrementally higher than the estimated lateral acceleration achieved by the vehicle 10.
- Block 56 computes the time-to-turn TTT based in part on the aforementioned lateral acceleration parameter CM_LAT_ACC as indicated above.
- the coefficient of friction COF is normally set to a value of nearly 1.0 (dry road surfaces), but is lowered when the locking characteristics of the brakes indicate that the road surface is wet or slippery.
- CM_LAT_ACC is maintained at the minimum value MIN_TURN_ACC
- the calculated turning radius R will be relatively large, which in turn, results in a relatively high value of the time-to-turn TTT.
- the calculated time-to-turn TTT is maintained artificially high until the driver of the host vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver. This essentially rules out a turning solution to an impending collision in cases where the driver fails to take evasive steering action. Ruling out a turning solution in this manner results in earlier and more effective automatic braking as will be evident in view of the following.
- Blocks 58-60 determine if driver-initiated evasive steering is sufficient to rule out automatic braking for collision mitigation.
- Block 58 defines a set of three conditions for ruling out collision mitigation braking, and block 60 disables automatic braking by setting the time-to-turn TTT to zero if all of the conditions are met.
- the term CM_LAT_ACC must be greater than a calibrated maximum lateral acceleration MAX_ACC; second, the lateral offset distance LOD must be less than a calibrated distance MIN_DIST; and third, the time-to-turn TTT must be less than the calculated time-to-collision TTC.
- the block 62 calculates the time-to-brake TTB; that is, the braking time needed to avoid an impending collision by applying the brakes of the host vehicle 10.
- a period of evasive braking is considered to consist of three consecutive stages: a pre-charge stage, a pressure build-up stage, and a maximum braking stage.
- the time-to-brake TTB can be estimated as the sum of three corresponding time intervals.
- the pre-charge stage the brake pads are moved into contact with the wear surface of the brake rotors or drums. This stage produces little or no braking effort, and is modeled as a calibrated delay time (pre-charge delay time PCDT) for purposes of calculating TTB.
- pre-charge delay time PCDT calibrated delay time
- the pre-charge delay time is set to zero.
- the pressure build-up stage is a period of time during which the braking effort rises to its full value, and the time associated with this stage may also be calibrated for a given type of vehicle and braking system.
- the maximum braking stage is a period of time during which full braking effort (1g of deceleration, for example) is sustained. This final period of time is modeled as a combined function of the braking deceleration, the speed VS of the host vehicle 10, and the coefficient of friction COF between its tires and the road surface. As above, the coefficient of friction COF is normally set to a value of nearly 1.0 (dry road surfaces), but is lowered when the locking characteristics of the brakes indicate that the road surface is wet or slippery.
- Block 64 compares the computed values of time-to-turn TTT and time-to-brake TTB. If TTT is less than TTB, a turning solution is selected, and the blocks 66-74 of FIG. 3B are executed to determine if automatic braking should be initiated based on a comparison of TTT with the time-to-collision TTC. If TTT is equal to or greater than TTB, a braking solution is selected, and the blocks 76-84 of FIG. 3C are executed to determine if automatic braking should be initiated based on a comparison of TTB with the time-to-collision TTC.
- block 66 of FIG. 3B is first executed to determine if the time-to-turn TTT is equal to or greater than the time-to-collision TTC. If so, the impending collision is unavoidable, and the block 68 is executed to initiate automatic braking and deployment or arming of various supplemental restraint devices in the host vehicle 10. If TTT ⁇ TTC, the impending collision is deemed to be avoidable by braking. However, the block 70 is executed to compare the sum (TTT + PCDT) to TTC, where TCDT is the aforementioned pre-charge delay time associated with the pre-charge stage of braking.
- TTT + PCDT the sum of the pre-charge delay will not make the collision unavoidable, and block 72 is executed to release automatic braking if already initiated. This same result occurs in cases where the term TTT is zeroed by block 60 to disable automatic braking, as mentioned above. However, if the sum (TTT + PCDT) is equal to or greater than TTC, the braking delay due to the pre-charge stage will make the collision unavoidable, and block 74 is executed to pre-charge the brakes to optimize collision mitigation due to braking, as well as to deploy or arm supplemental restraint devices in the host vehicle 10.
- block 76 is first executed to determine if the time-to-brake TTB is equal to or greater than the time-to-collision TTC. If so, the impending collision is unavoidable, and the block 78 is executed to initiate automatic braking and deployment or arming of the supplemental restraint devices in host vehicle 10. If TTB ⁇ TTC, the impending collision is deemed to be avoidable by braking. However, the block 80 is executed to compare the sum (TTB + PCDT) to TTC, where TCDT is the aforementioned pre-charge delay time associated with the pre-charge stage of braking.
- TTB + PCDT If the sum (TTB + PCDT) is less than TTC, the existence of the pre-charge delay will not make the collision unavoidable, and block 82 is executed to release automatic braking if already initiated. However, if the sum (TTB + PCDT) is equal to or greater than TTC, the braking delay due to the pre-charge stage will make the collision unavoidable, and block 84 is executed to pre-charge the brakes to optimize collision mitigation due to braking, as well as to deploy or arm supplemental restraint devices in host vehicle 10.
- the method of the present invention provides collision prediction and mitigation that has immunity from false alarms and yet provides effective collision mitigation, particularly in situations where the driver fails to initiate evasive maneuvers. While the present invention has been described with respect to the illustrated embodiment, it is recognized that numerous modifications and variations in addition to those mentioned herein will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but that it have the full scope permitted by the language of the following claims.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Transportation (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Regulating Braking Force (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to collision prediction for a motor vehicle, and more particularly to a prediction and mitigation method that takes into account the dynamic collision avoidance capability of the vehicle.
- It has been proposed to install a forward-looking radar or other ranging sensor on a vehicle for purposes of collision sensing. Various collision avoidance or collision mitigating actions can be taken depending on the imminence of a potential collision event. Such actions include, for example, warning the driver, initiating or maximizing braking, and arming or even deploying supplemental restraints for passenger protection. For example, the
U.S. Patent No. 6,084,508 to Mai et al. initiates emergency braking of a vehicle when it is determined that a collision with a detected obstacle can no longer be avoided by steering corrections or braking. A collision is deemed to be unavoidable according to Mai et al. when the target range is less than the minimum braking distance or the required steering evasion radius is less than the current or minimum steering radius. - A concern associated with collision predicting systems, particularly those that initiate collision avoidance or collision mitigating actions, is the potential for false alarms -- that is, a situation in which the system initiates an action prematurely or unnecessarily. For this reason, there is a tendency to overstate the vehicle's turning and braking capability. For example, assuming that the coefficient-of-friction between the vehicle tires and the road surface is reasonably high can eliminate most false alarms. However, this will severely limit the effectiveness of the system in situations where the vehicle is traveling on a low coefficient-of-friction surface such as a snowy or icy road. It will also reduce the amount of pre-collision braking that can be initiated prior to a collision in which the driver fails to initiate any evasive maneuver; and statistical studies show that this type of collision accounts for nearly 40% of all collisions. Accordingly, what is needed is an improved collision prediction and mitigation method that protects against false alarms and yet provides effective collision mitigation on low coefficient of friction surfaces and in situations where the driver fails to make evasive maneuvers.
- The present invention is directed to an improved collision prediction and mitigation method that takes into account the dynamic collision avoidance capability of the vehicle to optimize collision mitigation. Estimates of the time-to-brake (TTB) and the time-to-turn (TTT) are compared with the calculated time-to-collision (TTC). A collision is deemed to be unavoidable when the smaller of TTB and TTT is greater than TTC. The TTT estimate is based in part on a lateral acceleration parameter, and that parameter is initialized to a low value corresponding to initial turning action of the vehicle, and is set incrementally higher than the actual lateral acceleration when the driver initiates evasive turning. Also, the TTT and TTB estimates are increased by the time required to pre-charge the vehicle brakes so that pre-charging can be automatically initiated when required to optimize collision mitigation due to braking.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of host and target vehicles;
- FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a vehicle collision mitigation method according to the present invention; and
- FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C together constitute a flow diagram illustrating the method of the present invention. The portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3A determines if a steering solution or a braking solution should be selected; the portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3B describes the steering solution; and the portion of the flow diagram depicted in FIG. 3C describes the braking solution.
- The diagram of FIG. 1 depicts a
host vehicle 10 and a target vehicle or other obstacle in the forward path of thehost vehicle 10. Thehost vehicle 10 is equipped with a system including aradar ranging sensor 14 for carrying out the collision prediction and mitigation method of the present invention. Thehost vehicle 10 is moving in the direction of thetarget vehicle 12, which may be moving or stationary. The rangingsensor 14, which may also be used for other vehicular applications such as adaptive cruise control, provides three parameters of interest: range R, range-rate RR, and lateral offset distance LOD. The range and lateral offset distance parameters R and LOD are designated in the illustration of FIG. 1; the range-rate parameter RR is the closing velocity, or the velocity of thehost vehicle 10 relative to that of thetarget vehicle 12. In addition to the rangingsensor 14, thehost vehicle 10 is equipped with a vehicle speed sensor and a turning sensor such as a steering wheel angle sensor or a yaw rate sensor. - In situations where the
host vehicle 10 is closing on thetarget vehicle 12, the time remaining before thehost vehicle 10 collides with thetarget vehicle 12 can be calculated according to the quotient R/RR. That time is referred to herein as the time-to-collision, or TTC. The TTC and the LOD parameters are continuously updated as thehost vehicle 10 approaches thetarget vehicle 12, and the collision mitigation system aboard thehost vehicle 10 must determine if and when to initiate automatic braking to mitigate the severity of the collision. - In general, the driver of the
host vehicle 10 can avoid an impending collision with thetarget vehicle 12 by steering to change the heading ofhost vehicle 10 and/or by braking the host vehicle. The turning sensor and the LOD parameter provided by the rangingsensor 14 allow thehost vehicle 10 to determine if the collision can be avoided by steering. This is achieved by computing the time-to-turn, or TTT, and comparing it to TTC. Similarly, the speed VS and the known braking characteristics of thehost vehicle 10 allow thehost vehicle 10 to determine if the collision can be avoided by braking. This is achieved by computing the time-to-brake, or TTB, and comparing it to TTC. - The block diagram of FIG. 2 is a simplified representation of the collision prediction and mitigation method carried out by the
host vehicle 10 according to this invention. The R and RR parameters provided by rangingsensor 14 are supplied toblock 16, which calculates time-to-collision TTC according to the quotient R/RR. The LOD parameter, the vehicle speed VS and a lateral acceleration parameter LAT_ACC are supplied toblock 18, which calculates the time-to-turn TTT. This is achieved by using VS, LAT_ACC and the road coefficient of friction COF to calculate the turning radius R, computing the length of the curved travel path required to negotiate the lateral offset distance LOD, and using the computed travel path length and the range-rate parameter RR to compute the time-to-turn TTT. Finally, the vehicle speed VS is supplied toblock 20, which computes the time-to-brake TTB. - The
block 22 selects the minimum (MIN) of TTT and TTB, and supplies it to block 24 for comparison with TTC. If the smaller of TTT and TTB is greater than TTC, a collision with thetarget vehicle 12 is deemed to be unavoidable, and activation of thevehicle brakes 26 is automatically initiated to mitigate the severity of the collision. - The
block 28 determines the lateral acceleration parameter LAT_ACC used in determining time-to-turn TTT based on the output of a turning sensor; in the illustrated embodiment, the turning sensor provide a measure of the steering angle SA. To address the situation where the driver of thehost vehicle 10 fails to initiate any evasive steering, LAT_ACC is initialized to a low value corresponding to initial turning action of the vehicle, and is increased toward its maximum capability as the turning sensor indicates that the driver has initiated evasive steering. - The flow diagram of FIGS. 3A-3C illustrates the method of this invention in the manner of a high level routine periodically executed by a microprocessor-based controller aboard
host vehicle 10. Following initialization of various parameters and control variables atblock 40 of FIG. 3A, theblock 42 is executed to calculate the time-to-collision TTC according to the quotient R/RR. Theblock 44 defines a set of three enabling conditions for automatic collision mitigation braking, and theblock 46 disables automatic braking if one or more of the conditions are not met. First, the vehicle speed VS must exceed a calibrated minimum speed such as 8 MPH; second, the range-rate RR (i.e., the closing speed) must be less than a calibrated speed such as 5 MPH; and third, the time-to-collision TTC must be less than a calibrated maximum time such as one minute. Ifblock 46 disables automatic braking, the blocks 42-44 are re-executed after some dwell period. If the enabling conditions ofblock 44 are met, theblock 48 estimates the lateral acceleration LAT_ACC of thehost vehicle 10. As indicated above, LAT_ACC can be estimated based on the measured steering angle SA, in combination with known dynamic characteristics of thehost vehicle 10. Alternately, LAT_ACC can be estimated based on a measure of yaw rate, although yaw rate measurements tend to lag rather than lead lateral acceleration of thehost vehicle 10 due to steering. - The blocks 50-54 select the value of a collision mitigation lateral acceleration parameter, CM_LAT_ACC, used to compute the time-to-turn TTT. The
block 50 compares the absolute value of the estimated lateral acceleration LAT_ACC to a calibrated value MIN_TURN_ACC corresponding to initial turning action of thehost vehicle 10. By way of example, MIN_TURN_ACC may have a value of approximately 5.0 m/sec2. The term |LAT_ACC| will be less than MIN_TURN_ACC until the driver ofhost vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver. So long as |LAT_ACC| < MIN_TURN_ACC, theblock 52 sets CM_LAT_ACC equal to MIN_TURN_ACC. When |LAT_ACC| equals or exceeds MIN_TURN_ACC, theblock 54 sets CM_LAT_ACC equal to the sum of |LAT_ACCEL| and a calibrated incremental amount ACC_STEP. Consequently, CM_LAT_ACC is maintained at a relatively low value (MIN_TURN_ACC) until the driver ofhost vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver, and then is set to a value that is incrementally higher than the estimated lateral acceleration achieved by thevehicle 10. -
Block 56 computes the time-to-turn TTT based in part on the aforementioned lateral acceleration parameter CM_LAT_ACC as indicated above. Specifically, the parameter CM_LAT_ACC is used as the lateral acceleration AL in the equation:
where R is the host vehicle turning radius, VS is the host vehicle speed, and COF is the coefficient of friction between its tires and the road surface. The coefficient of friction COF is normally set to a value of nearly 1.0 (dry road surfaces), but is lowered when the locking characteristics of the brakes indicate that the road surface is wet or slippery. So long as CM_LAT_ACC is maintained at the minimum value MIN_TURN_ACC, the calculated turning radius R will be relatively large, which in turn, results in a relatively high value of the time-to-turn TTT. In other words, the calculated time-to-turn TTT is maintained artificially high until the driver of thehost vehicle 10 initiates a substantial evasive steering maneuver. This essentially rules out a turning solution to an impending collision in cases where the driver fails to take evasive steering action. Ruling out a turning solution in this manner results in earlier and more effective automatic braking as will be evident in view of the following. - Blocks 58-60 determine if driver-initiated evasive steering is sufficient to rule out automatic braking for collision mitigation.
Block 58 defines a set of three conditions for ruling out collision mitigation braking, and block 60 disables automatic braking by setting the time-to-turn TTT to zero if all of the conditions are met. First, the term CM_LAT_ACC must be greater than a calibrated maximum lateral acceleration MAX_ACC; second, the lateral offset distance LOD must be less than a calibrated distance MIN_DIST; and third, the time-to-turn TTT must be less than the calculated time-to-collision TTC. - The
block 62 calculates the time-to-brake TTB; that is, the braking time needed to avoid an impending collision by applying the brakes of thehost vehicle 10. In a typical hydraulic braking system, a period of evasive braking is considered to consist of three consecutive stages: a pre-charge stage, a pressure build-up stage, and a maximum braking stage. The time-to-brake TTB can be estimated as the sum of three corresponding time intervals. In the pre-charge stage, the brake pads are moved into contact with the wear surface of the brake rotors or drums. This stage produces little or no braking effort, and is modeled as a calibrated delay time (pre-charge delay time PCDT) for purposes of calculating TTB. If the brake switch or a hydraulic pressure transducer indicates that the driver has already depressed the brake pedal, the pre-charge delay time is set to zero. The pressure build-up stage is a period of time during which the braking effort rises to its full value, and the time associated with this stage may also be calibrated for a given type of vehicle and braking system. Finally, the maximum braking stage is a period of time during which full braking effort (1g of deceleration, for example) is sustained. This final period of time is modeled as a combined function of the braking deceleration, the speed VS of thehost vehicle 10, and the coefficient of friction COF between its tires and the road surface. As above, the coefficient of friction COF is normally set to a value of nearly 1.0 (dry road surfaces), but is lowered when the locking characteristics of the brakes indicate that the road surface is wet or slippery. -
Block 64 compares the computed values of time-to-turn TTT and time-to-brake TTB. If TTT is less than TTB, a turning solution is selected, and the blocks 66-74 of FIG. 3B are executed to determine if automatic braking should be initiated based on a comparison of TTT with the time-to-collision TTC. If TTT is equal to or greater than TTB, a braking solution is selected, and the blocks 76-84 of FIG. 3C are executed to determine if automatic braking should be initiated based on a comparison of TTB with the time-to-collision TTC. - If a turning solution is selected (i.e., TTT < TTB), block 66 of FIG. 3B is first executed to determine if the time-to-turn TTT is equal to or greater than the time-to-collision TTC. If so, the impending collision is unavoidable, and the
block 68 is executed to initiate automatic braking and deployment or arming of various supplemental restraint devices in thehost vehicle 10. If TTT < TTC, the impending collision is deemed to be avoidable by braking. However, theblock 70 is executed to compare the sum (TTT + PCDT) to TTC, where TCDT is the aforementioned pre-charge delay time associated with the pre-charge stage of braking. If the sum (TTT + PCDT) is less than TTC, the existence of the pre-charge delay will not make the collision unavoidable, and block 72 is executed to release automatic braking if already initiated. This same result occurs in cases where the term TTT is zeroed byblock 60 to disable automatic braking, as mentioned above. However, if the sum (TTT + PCDT) is equal to or greater than TTC, the braking delay due to the pre-charge stage will make the collision unavoidable, and block 74 is executed to pre-charge the brakes to optimize collision mitigation due to braking, as well as to deploy or arm supplemental restraint devices in thehost vehicle 10. - If a braking solution is selected (i.e., TTT >= TTB), block 76 is first executed to determine if the time-to-brake TTB is equal to or greater than the time-to-collision TTC. If so, the impending collision is unavoidable, and the block 78 is executed to initiate automatic braking and deployment or arming of the supplemental restraint devices in
host vehicle 10. If TTB < TTC, the impending collision is deemed to be avoidable by braking. However, theblock 80 is executed to compare the sum (TTB + PCDT) to TTC, where TCDT is the aforementioned pre-charge delay time associated with the pre-charge stage of braking. If the sum (TTB + PCDT) is less than TTC, the existence of the pre-charge delay will not make the collision unavoidable, and block 82 is executed to release automatic braking if already initiated. However, if the sum (TTB + PCDT) is equal to or greater than TTC, the braking delay due to the pre-charge stage will make the collision unavoidable, and block 84 is executed to pre-charge the brakes to optimize collision mitigation due to braking, as well as to deploy or arm supplemental restraint devices inhost vehicle 10. - In summary, the method of the present invention provides collision prediction and mitigation that has immunity from false alarms and yet provides effective collision mitigation, particularly in situations where the driver fails to initiate evasive maneuvers. While the present invention has been described with respect to the illustrated embodiment, it is recognized that numerous modifications and variations in addition to those mentioned herein will occur to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but that it have the full scope permitted by the language of the following claims.
Claims (6)
- A method of mitigating an impending collision of a host vehicle (10) with a target obstacle (12), comprising the steps of:detecting a time-to-collision (14, 16; 42) between the host vehicle (10) and the target obstacle (12);calculating a steering radius (18; 56) of the host vehicle (10) based on a velocity of the host (10) vehicle and a lateral acceleration parameter;estimating a time-to-turn (18; 56) for avoiding the impending collision by steering the host vehicle (10) based on the calculated steering radius;estimating a time-to-brake (20; 62) for avoiding the impending collision by braking the host vehicle (10);selecting a minimum time (22; 64) for avoiding the impending collision by steering or braking the host vehicle (10); andinitiating automatic braking (26; 66, 68; 76, 78) of the host vehicle (10) if the selected minimum time exceeds the detected time-to-collision.
- The method of claim 1, including the steps of:sensing an evasive steering maneuver (50) of the host vehicle (10);setting the lateral acceleration parameter to a minimum acceleration value (52) that results in an artificially high estimation of the time-to-turn if said evasive steering maneuver is not sensed; andsetting the lateral acceleration parameter (54) to a value indicative of an actual lateral acceleration of the host vehicle (10) if said evasive steering maneuver is sensed.
- The method of claim 1, including the steps of:determining a lateral acceleration (28; 48) of the host vehicle (10);setting the lateral acceleration parameter to a minimum acceleration value (52) that results in an artificially high estimate of the time-to-turn if the determined lateral acceleration is below said minimum acceleration value (50); andsetting the lateral acceleration parameter based on the determined lateral acceleration (54) if the determined lateral acceleration is above said minimum acceleration value (50).
- The method of claim 3, including the step of:setting the lateral acceleration parameter incrementally higher than the determined lateral acceleration (54) if the determined lateral acceleration is above said minimum acceleration value (50).
- The method of claim 1, including the steps of:sensing a lateral offset distance (14) between the host vehicle (10) and the target obstacle (12); anddisabling automatic braking (60) of the host vehicle (10) if the lateral acceleration parameter exceeds a reference acceleration, the sensed lateral offset distance is less than a reference distance, and the estimated time-to-turn exceeds the detected time-to-collision (58).
- The method of claim 1, where braking of the host vehicle (10) is preceded by a pre-charge delay time during, and the method includes the steps of:initiating automatic brake pre-charging (74; 84) of the host vehicle (10) if the selected minimum time is less than the detected time-to-collision, but within said pre-charge delay time of the detected time-to-collision (66, 70; 76, 80).
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/506,059 US20080046145A1 (en) | 2006-08-17 | 2006-08-17 | Collision prediction and mitigation method for a vehicle |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1889765A1 true EP1889765A1 (en) | 2008-02-20 |
Family
ID=38657390
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07075676A Withdrawn EP1889765A1 (en) | 2006-08-17 | 2007-08-13 | Collision prediction and mitigation method for a vehicle |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20080046145A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1889765A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011092229A1 (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2011-08-04 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method for automatically decelerating a vehicle to prevent a collision or reduce the consequences of a collision |
US8831870B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2014-09-09 | Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | Vehicle collision avoidance and mitigation system |
US10384657B2 (en) | 2016-01-21 | 2019-08-20 | Volkswagen Ag | Method and control device for self-braking a motor vehicle |
Families Citing this family (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8065044B2 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2011-11-22 | The University Of Liverpool | Vehicle guidance system |
JP2010030404A (en) * | 2008-07-28 | 2010-02-12 | Visteon Global Technologies Inc | Position detection method and position detection apparatus for preceding vehicle and data filtering method |
DE102008043264A1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2010-05-06 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for maintaining a driver-independent braking intervention after a collision |
DE102010028384A1 (en) * | 2009-05-07 | 2010-11-11 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Method and device for controlling or controlling the driving stability of a vehicle |
US9963127B2 (en) * | 2010-01-15 | 2018-05-08 | Volvo Car Corporation | Collision mitigation system and method for braking a vehicle |
WO2012117044A2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2012-09-07 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Method and device for the prediction and adaptation of movement trajectories of motor vehicles |
US8983706B2 (en) | 2011-03-01 | 2015-03-17 | Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg | Safety device for motor vehicle and method for operating a motor vehicle |
EP2683586A1 (en) | 2011-03-09 | 2014-01-15 | Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG | Safety device for a motor vehicle and method for operating a motor vehicle |
US8855866B2 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2014-10-07 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Rear end advanced collision technology |
US8849515B2 (en) * | 2012-07-24 | 2014-09-30 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Steering assist in driver initiated collision avoidance maneuver |
US9187091B2 (en) * | 2012-07-30 | 2015-11-17 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Collision detection system with a plausibiity module |
EP2934967B1 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2019-01-02 | Continental Teves AG & Co. OHG | Method and device for the automated braking and steering of a vehicle |
EP2752348A1 (en) * | 2013-01-04 | 2014-07-09 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Adaptive emergency brake and steer assist system based on driver focus |
DE102013224508A1 (en) * | 2013-11-29 | 2015-06-03 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Method and device for automatic assessment of the risk of collision of a vehicle with an object |
US9809219B2 (en) * | 2014-01-29 | 2017-11-07 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | System for accommodating a pedestrian during autonomous vehicle operation |
US9604609B2 (en) | 2014-05-12 | 2017-03-28 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Emergency in-lane steering assist with braking |
JP6361572B2 (en) * | 2015-05-14 | 2018-07-25 | 株式会社デンソー | Alarm control device |
WO2017169608A1 (en) * | 2016-03-28 | 2017-10-05 | 日本精機株式会社 | Driving assistance system and display device |
US10232849B2 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2019-03-19 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Collision mitigation and avoidance |
US10379538B1 (en) * | 2017-03-20 | 2019-08-13 | Zoox, Inc. | Trajectory generation using motion primitives |
CN111572541B (en) * | 2020-04-14 | 2022-06-14 | 吉利汽车研究院(宁波)有限公司 | Vehicle obstacle avoidance method and system |
CN114038196A (en) * | 2021-11-18 | 2022-02-11 | 成都车晓科技有限公司 | Vehicle forward collision avoidance early warning system and method |
CN116691623A (en) * | 2023-08-07 | 2023-09-05 | 北京中科慧眼科技有限公司 | Brake force generation method and device based on self-adaptive vehicle distance maintaining system |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003007271A2 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for automatically triggering a vehicle deceleration |
EP1323603A2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-07-02 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automatic brake system of wheeled motor vehicle |
US20040193374A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Hac Aleksander B. | Collision avoidance with active steering and braking |
WO2006061106A1 (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-15 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method for adapting intervention parameters of an assistance system of a vehicle |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5742918A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1998-04-21 | Ford Global Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically compensating a lateral acceleration of a motor vehicle |
JP4011711B2 (en) * | 1998-01-13 | 2007-11-21 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Vehicle travel safety device |
US6677855B2 (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2004-01-13 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | System to determine the intent to brake and to provide initiation and engagement of the brake system |
-
2006
- 2006-08-17 US US11/506,059 patent/US20080046145A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2007
- 2007-08-13 EP EP07075676A patent/EP1889765A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003007271A2 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2003-01-23 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method and device for automatically triggering a vehicle deceleration |
EP1323603A2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2003-07-02 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Automatic brake system of wheeled motor vehicle |
US20040193374A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Hac Aleksander B. | Collision avoidance with active steering and braking |
WO2006061106A1 (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-15 | Daimlerchrysler Ag | Method for adapting intervention parameters of an assistance system of a vehicle |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011092229A1 (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2011-08-04 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | Method for automatically decelerating a vehicle to prevent a collision or reduce the consequences of a collision |
US8831870B2 (en) | 2011-11-01 | 2014-09-09 | Visteon Global Technologies, Inc. | Vehicle collision avoidance and mitigation system |
US10384657B2 (en) | 2016-01-21 | 2019-08-20 | Volkswagen Ag | Method and control device for self-braking a motor vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20080046145A1 (en) | 2008-02-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1889765A1 (en) | Collision prediction and mitigation method for a vehicle | |
US9633565B2 (en) | Active safety system and method for operating the same | |
US8694222B2 (en) | Collision avoidance system and method of operating the same | |
US8396642B2 (en) | Adaptive cruise control system | |
JP6195578B2 (en) | Method for determining the emergency braking situation of a vehicle | |
US20060163943A1 (en) | Method and device for automatically initiating an emergency brake procedure in motor vehicles | |
JP4195301B2 (en) | Vehicle collision prevention method | |
EP1349131B1 (en) | Vehicle collision preventing apparatus | |
US8150583B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for avoiding or mitigating vehicle collisions | |
US9508261B2 (en) | Method and device for operating a vehicle | |
US7565234B2 (en) | Automotive collision mitigation apparatus | |
US6084508A (en) | Automatic emergency braking method and arrangement | |
US9428160B2 (en) | Brake control apparatus | |
US20070296564A1 (en) | Rear collision warning system | |
US7200478B2 (en) | Lane departure prevention apparatus | |
CN109383499B (en) | Control device and method of front anti-collision auxiliary system | |
US9771055B1 (en) | Front impact mitigation system for a vehicle and method | |
US20090234543A1 (en) | Method for Determining a Direction of Travel in a Motor Vehicle | |
JP2010030396A (en) | Safety controller for vehicle | |
EP3371015B1 (en) | A control system and method for a vehicle comprising an autonomous emergency braking system | |
US20100036565A1 (en) | Method and Device for Actuating a Passenger Protection Means | |
KR101897466B1 (en) | Auto Emergency Braking Method Using Road Friction Coefficient | |
EP1985512B1 (en) | Vehicle seat-belt device and control method thereof | |
CN108146433A (en) | The emergency auto braking system and method for vehicle | |
JP5462927B2 (en) | Vehicle operation support device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080820 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080926 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAC | Information related to communication of intention to grant a patent modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20091006 |