EP1878505A1 - Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet - Google Patents
Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1878505A1 EP1878505A1 EP06117130A EP06117130A EP1878505A1 EP 1878505 A1 EP1878505 A1 EP 1878505A1 EP 06117130 A EP06117130 A EP 06117130A EP 06117130 A EP06117130 A EP 06117130A EP 1878505 A1 EP1878505 A1 EP 1878505A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- magnet
- fragments
- liberated
- scrap
- belt
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C—MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03C1/00—Magnetic separation
- B03C1/02—Magnetic separation acting directly on the substance being separated
- B03C1/16—Magnetic separation acting directly on the substance being separated with material carriers in the form of belts
- B03C1/22—Magnetic separation acting directly on the substance being separated with material carriers in the form of belts with non-movable magnets
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet.
- the present invention relates to the dramatic reduction of the copper content in liberated ferrous scrap in particular in steel scrap.
- Steel scrap is produced, among others, from end-of-life consumer products, such as cars as well as electric and electronic appliances at car shredders and waste from energy plants.
- liberated scrap means fragments which essentially do not contain materials other than iron and steel.
- not liberated ferrous scrap refers to fragments containing other materials in particular copper.
- ferrous scrap obtained from shedders contain both liberated and not liberated scrap. This "shredder steel scrap", obtained according to the prior art separation methods, is sold to steel manufacturers to be re-melted and processed into new steel products.
- the threshold value of copper in steel scrap set by steelmakers has gone down from 0.25 wt-% to 0.2 wt-%.
- the amount of copper containing parts in steel scrap has substantially risen, up to about 20 wt-%, as a result of design changes of durable consumer goods and passenger vehicles.
- the liberated ferrous scrap fragments are separated from the not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet wherein a mixture of said liberated ferrous and not liberated ferrous fragments is fed to a continuous conveyor belt which is driven around drums and wherein said magnetic is fixed in the drum distant from the feeding point.
- Said magnet is attracting liberated ferromagnetic material towards the belt as it passes around the drum, which device comprising a plurality of magnet poles extending around the interior of the drum for substantially 180°, wherein the uppermost pole being positioned at an angle of at least 15° to the vertical through the axis of the drum in the direction of belt travel.
- the speed of the conveyor belt may not exceed 500 feet per minute.
- WO 88/05696 discloses a process for separating magnetic ore particles from non-magnetic particles using a short belt magnetic separator having a pulley head with axial pole permanent magnets located within said pulley head, said magnets being mounted in a fixed position within said pulley head during operation of said separator.
- Said axial pole magnets within the pulley head are positioned so that said magnets extend along an arc beginning at a location spaced at least one degree beyond the point of tangency T of an upper surface of the belt with the pulley head.
- the present invention relates to a process and device for the separation of liberated ferrous scrap fragments from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by using a single dipole magnet rather than a plurality of magnets from the above disclosed prior art.
- the present invention relates to a process for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet, wherein a mixture of said liberated ferrous and not liberated ferrous fragments is fed onto a continuous conveyor belt which is driven around drums and wherein said magnet is fixed in the drum distant from the feeding point, which magnet is a single magnet, preferably a dipole magnet, having magnetic field lines in the separation zone which are predominantly parallel to the belt surface.
- the invention also relates to a device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap in a separation zone by means of a fixed magnet in the drum distant from the feeding point which device is provided with a first drum and a second drum and a continuous belt for the transportation of a mixture of liberated and not liberated scrap wherein said magnet is a dipole magnet.
- Said magnet preferably a dipole magnet, is cylindrical and furthermore the position of said magnet in the drum is such that the magnetic field lines are predominantly parallel to the surface of said belt.
- the copper content of the feed is 1.5 wt-%.
- the parallel orientation of the magnetic field line gives the best result relating to a copper content of the recovered steel fraction, i.e. only about 0,18 wt-% copper versus iron recovery of about 82.9 wt-%.
- the copper content of the copper-rich fraction obtained by the centrifugal forces is about 8.0 wt-% versus about 17.1 wt-% iron recovery in the parallel orientation of the magnetic field lines.
- the Figure shows the preferred embodiment of the device 1 of the invention for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap.
- the liberated and not liberated scrap mixture is fed to the continuous conveyor belt 4 at drum 2 for the transportation of said scrap mixture with a belt speed of 2 to 5 m/s, preferably 3 to 4 m/s, and most preferably 3.5 m/s to the separation zone 6.
- a belt speed of 2 to 5 m/s, preferably 3 to 4 m/s, and most preferably 3.5 m/s to the separation zone 6.
- the magnetic field strength should be in balance with the speed of the conveyor belt.
- the magnetic field strength is 0.10-0.15 Tesla at the belt surface at a belt speed of 3.5 m/s. At a lower belt speed the optimum magnetic field strength will be lower whereas at a higher speed the magnetic field strength should be higher than 0.10-0.15 Tesla.
- the magnetic field strength is proportional to the belt speed.
- the Figure further shows the separation zone 6 and some of the magnetic field lines 7.
- the arrow 8 shows the belt travel direction.
- the magnet preferably a dipole magnet, which is furthermore preferably a cylindrical magnet, 5 is fixed in the drum 3.
- the capital letters N and S refer to north and south of the dipole magnet.
- N is in the down and S is in the upper section, provided that the magnetic field lines are predominantly parallel to the surface of said belt.
Landscapes
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
- Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
- Water Treatment By Electricity Or Magnetism (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet.
- Basically, the present invention relates to the dramatic reduction of the copper content in liberated ferrous scrap in particular in steel scrap.
- Steel scrap is produced, among others, from end-of-life consumer products, such as cars as well as electric and electronic appliances at car shredders and waste from energy plants.
- When these products are shredded in order to recycle the steel, scrap particles are passed through a magnetic separator to recover the liberated ferrous or steel particles. The term liberated scrap means fragments which essentially do not contain materials other than iron and steel. The term not liberated ferrous scrap refers to fragments containing other materials in particular copper. Furthermore, ferrous scrap obtained from shedders contain both liberated and not liberated scrap. This "shredder steel scrap", obtained according to the prior art separation methods, is sold to steel manufacturers to be re-melted and processed into new steel products.
- To date, steelmakers require the copper content of steel scrap be less than 0.2 wt-%, preferably less than 0.1 wt-%. However, shredder ferrous or steel scrap as currently produced by the magnetic separation at shredder yards often contains more copper, up to 2 wt-%. This is because end-of-life consumer products contain an increasing amount of copper containing parts, in which copper and steel are intimately integrated, and therefore not liberated, such as electric motor armatures and transformers. The average copper content of such parts is about 20 wt-%. Hence, there is a need to dramatically reduce the copper content of such liberated ferrous or steel scrap prior to re-melting.
- During the last decade, the threshold value of copper in steel scrap set by steelmakers has gone down from 0.25 wt-% to 0.2 wt-%. In the same period, the amount of copper containing parts in steel scrap has substantially risen, up to about 20 wt-%, as a result of design changes of durable consumer goods and passenger vehicles.
- The removal of copper from steel scrap can be achieved metallurgically, by hand sorting or by physical separation. The metallurgical method is very costly. On the other hand, despite its obvious disadvantages, hand sorting is a widely applied method today. However, the costs of hand sorting rise sharply with both throughput and copper content.
- To date, two proposed methods to reduce the copper content of liberated ferrous material or steel scrap by physical separation means are known. One method is to further fragmentize the scrap so that the copper is liberated from the steel and can be separated by conventional magnetic separation devices. At current prices, this route costs approx. 20 euro/ton scrap and is very energy-intensive.
- A second method, which eliminates the need of an additional shredding step, was described by Peace in
GB 1.602.279 - According to this document, the liberated ferrous scrap fragments are separated from the not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet wherein a mixture of said liberated ferrous and not liberated ferrous fragments is fed to a continuous conveyor belt which is driven around drums and wherein said magnetic is fixed in the drum distant from the feeding point.
- Said magnet is attracting liberated ferromagnetic material towards the belt as it passes around the drum, which device comprising a plurality of magnet poles extending around the interior of the drum for substantially 180°, wherein the uppermost pole being positioned at an angle of at least 15° to the vertical through the axis of the drum in the direction of belt travel.
- The speed of the conveyor belt may not exceed 500 feet per minute.
-
WO 88/05696 - Said axial pole magnets within the pulley head are positioned so that said magnets extend along an arc beginning at a location spaced at least one degree beyond the point of tangency T of an upper surface of the belt with the pulley head.
- Now, the present invention relates to a process and device for the separation of liberated ferrous scrap fragments from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by using a single dipole magnet rather than a plurality of magnets from the above disclosed prior art.
- It appeared surprisingly that the magnetic field geometry in the separation zone is important for the separation process.
- Accordingly, the present invention relates to a process for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet, wherein a mixture of said liberated ferrous and not liberated ferrous fragments is fed onto a continuous conveyor belt which is driven around drums and wherein said magnet is fixed in the drum distant from the feeding point, which magnet is a single magnet, preferably a dipole magnet, having magnetic field lines in the separation zone which are predominantly parallel to the belt surface.
- It is surprising that when the orientation of the magnetic field lines is predominantly parallel to the belt surface in a separation zone, a substantial better separation is obtained compared to any other field line orientation.
- Furthermore, satisfactory results are obtained by the use of a cylindrical dipole magnet.
- The invention also relates to a device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap in a separation zone by means of a fixed magnet in the drum distant from the feeding point which device is provided with a first drum and a second drum and a continuous belt for the transportation of a mixture of liberated and not liberated scrap wherein said magnet is a dipole magnet.
- Said magnet, preferably a dipole magnet, is cylindrical and furthermore the position of said magnet in the drum is such that the magnetic field lines are predominantly parallel to the surface of said belt.
- Reference is made to the table below wherein examples are given from magnetic field line orientation to belt surface. In the table, mention is made of a low-copper fraction and a copper-rich fraction.
- It is noted that the copper content of the feed is 1.5 wt-%.
TABLE magnetic field low-copper fraction copper-rich fraction line orientation copper content steel recovery copper content steel recovery to belt surface [wt-%] [wt-%] [wt-%] [wt-%] parallel 0.18 82.9 8.0 17.1 perpendicular 0.40 85.0 8.1 15.0 intermediate 0.55 77.6 5.0 22.4 - It appears from the above table that there are used three magnetic field line orientations, i.e. parallel, perpendicular and intermediate.
- As it can be seen from the table, the parallel orientation of the magnetic field line gives the best result relating to a copper content of the recovered steel fraction, i.e. only about 0,18 wt-% copper versus iron recovery of about 82.9 wt-%.
- The copper content of the copper-rich fraction obtained by the centrifugal forces is about 8.0 wt-% versus about 17.1 wt-% iron recovery in the parallel orientation of the magnetic field lines.
- From the table it can be seen that the perpendicular and intermediate magnetic field line orientation do result in a copper content in the low-copper fraction of 0.40 and 0.55 wt-% respectively.
- From the above table it clearly follows that the parallel magnetic field line orientation is preferred.
- Furthermore, the present invention will be illustrated by the enclosed Figure.
- The Figure shows the preferred embodiment of the
device 1 of the invention for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap. - The liberated and not liberated scrap mixture is fed to the continuous conveyor belt 4 at
drum 2 for the transportation of said scrap mixture with a belt speed of 2 to 5 m/s, preferably 3 to 4 m/s, and most preferably 3.5 m/s to the separation zone 6. By means of centrifugal forces the copper-rich fraction will be separated from the liberated ferrous scrap fraction, whereas the liberated ferromagnetic fragments carried around the drum 3 will leave the conveyor belt at a later stage. - In order to obtain a more satisfactory separation according to the invention the magnetic field strength should be in balance with the speed of the conveyor belt. Usually the magnetic field strength is 0.10-0.15 Tesla at the belt surface at a belt speed of 3.5 m/s. At a lower belt speed the optimum magnetic field strength will be lower whereas at a higher speed the magnetic field strength should be higher than 0.10-0.15 Tesla. Generally the magnetic field strength is proportional to the belt speed.
- The Figure further shows the separation zone 6 and some of the
magnetic field lines 7. Thearrow 8 shows the belt travel direction. - The magnet, preferably a dipole magnet, which is furthermore preferably a cylindrical magnet, 5 is fixed in the drum 3. The capital letters N and S refer to north and south of the dipole magnet. For an appropriate working the north and south of the dipole magnet may be interchanged, so that N is in the down and S is in the upper section, provided that the magnetic field lines are predominantly parallel to the surface of said belt.
- It should be readily appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art relative to this invention that numerous variations and permutations are possible while keeping within the intent of this invention, and that only the language of the following claims, including equivalents thereto, should be used to gauge the scope of the invention and the rights and title to the inventor therefore.
Claims (8)
- A process for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet, wherein a mixture of said liberated ferrous and not liberated ferrous fragments is fed onto a continuous conveyor belt which is driven around drums and wherein said magnet is fixed in the drum distant from the feeding point, characterized in that a single magnet is used having magnetic field lines in the separation zone predominantly parallel to the belt surface.
- The process according to claim 1, characterized in that said magnet is a dipole magnet.
- The process according to claim 2, characterized in that said dipole magnet is a cylindrical dipole magnet.
- The process according to claims 1-3, characterized in that the belt speed is 2 to 5 m/s, preferably 3 to 4 m/s, most preferably 3.5 m/s.
- The process of claims 1-4, characterized in that said dipole magnet has a magnetic field strength of about 0.10 - 0.15 Tesla at the belt surface at a belt speed of about 3.5 m/s.
- A device (1) for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap in a separation zone (6) by means of a fixed magnet (5) in the drum (3) distant from the feeding point which device is provided with a first drum (2) and a second drum (3) and a continuous belt (4) for the transportation of the scrap mixture, characterized in that said magnet (5) is a magnet having magnetic field lines (7) in the separation zone (6) which are predominantly parallel to the surface of said belt (4).
- Device (1) according to claim 6, characterized in that the magnet is a dipole magnet.
- The device according to claim 7, characterized in that said dipole magnet (5) is cylindrical and has a magnetic field strength of 0.10 - 0.15 Tesla at the belt surface at a belt speed of about 3.5 m/s.
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE602006014960T DE602006014960D1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Method and apparatus for separating liberated non-ferrous metal particles from liberated ferrous metal particles by means of a static magnet |
EP10155597A EP2206558B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
EP06117130A EP1878505B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
DK06117130.2T DK1878505T3 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Method and apparatus for separating released ferrous scrap fragments from non-released ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
AT06117130T ATE471213T1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING FREED NON-FERROUS METAL PARTICLES FROM FREED FERROUS METAL PARTICLES USING A STATIC MAGNET |
ES06117130T ES2346145T3 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | PROCESS AND DEVICE FOR THE SEPARATION OF FRAGMENTS OF FERROUS WASTE FREE FROM FRAGMENTS OF FERROID WASTE NOT RELEASED BY A STATIC MAGNET. |
AT10155597T ATE533560T1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR SEPARATING FREED NON-FERROUS METAL PARTICLES FROM FREED FERROUS METAL PARTICLES USING A STATIC MAGNET |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP06117130A EP1878505B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10155597.7 Division-Into | 2010-03-05 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1878505A1 true EP1878505A1 (en) | 2008-01-16 |
EP1878505B1 EP1878505B1 (en) | 2010-06-16 |
Family
ID=37460045
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06117130A Not-in-force EP1878505B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
EP10155597A Not-in-force EP2206558B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10155597A Not-in-force EP2206558B1 (en) | 2006-07-13 | 2006-07-13 | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP1878505B1 (en) |
AT (2) | ATE533560T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602006014960D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1878505T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2346145T3 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2010090517A1 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-12 | Monsanto Holland B.V. | Enriching the seed quality of a batch of seeds |
NL2002736C2 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2010-10-12 | Univ Delft Tech | Method for separating magnetic pieces of material. |
WO2010117273A1 (en) | 2009-04-08 | 2010-10-14 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Method and apparatus for separating a non-ferous metal-comprising fraction from ferrous scrap |
US8381913B2 (en) | 2008-02-27 | 2013-02-26 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Method and apparatus for separating parts, in particular seeds, having different densities |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN106238205A (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2016-12-21 | 宿州市威菱耐火材料有限责任公司 | A kind of magnetic separator |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2690263A (en) * | 1950-05-12 | 1954-09-28 | Electromagnets Ltd | Magnetic separator |
DE1051752B (en) * | 1957-05-27 | 1959-03-05 | Gerd Rayhrer Dr Ing | Magnetic separator of iron parts from a material flow |
US3057477A (en) | 1961-10-24 | 1962-10-09 | Rappaport Maximiliano | Pill sorting apparatus |
GB1602279A (en) | 1978-05-23 | 1981-11-11 | British Steel Corp | Magnetic separation |
WO1988005696A1 (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1988-08-11 | Usx Engineers And Consultants, Inc. | Separation by belt-type magnetic separator |
EP0455948A1 (en) | 1990-05-10 | 1991-11-13 | Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH | Process and apparatus for the separation of, in particular weakly magnetisable, materials from a mixture of solids |
-
2006
- 2006-07-13 AT AT10155597T patent/ATE533560T1/en active
- 2006-07-13 EP EP06117130A patent/EP1878505B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-07-13 AT AT06117130T patent/ATE471213T1/en active
- 2006-07-13 DE DE602006014960T patent/DE602006014960D1/en active Active
- 2006-07-13 EP EP10155597A patent/EP2206558B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-07-13 DK DK06117130.2T patent/DK1878505T3/en active
- 2006-07-13 ES ES06117130T patent/ES2346145T3/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2690263A (en) * | 1950-05-12 | 1954-09-28 | Electromagnets Ltd | Magnetic separator |
DE1051752B (en) * | 1957-05-27 | 1959-03-05 | Gerd Rayhrer Dr Ing | Magnetic separator of iron parts from a material flow |
US3057477A (en) | 1961-10-24 | 1962-10-09 | Rappaport Maximiliano | Pill sorting apparatus |
GB1602279A (en) | 1978-05-23 | 1981-11-11 | British Steel Corp | Magnetic separation |
WO1988005696A1 (en) | 1987-01-30 | 1988-08-11 | Usx Engineers And Consultants, Inc. | Separation by belt-type magnetic separator |
EP0455948A1 (en) | 1990-05-10 | 1991-11-13 | Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GmbH | Process and apparatus for the separation of, in particular weakly magnetisable, materials from a mixture of solids |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8381913B2 (en) | 2008-02-27 | 2013-02-26 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Method and apparatus for separating parts, in particular seeds, having different densities |
US8418855B2 (en) | 2008-02-27 | 2013-04-16 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Method and apparatus for the separation of solid particles having different densities |
WO2010090517A1 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2010-08-12 | Monsanto Holland B.V. | Enriching the seed quality of a batch of seeds |
WO2010117273A1 (en) | 2009-04-08 | 2010-10-14 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Method and apparatus for separating a non-ferous metal-comprising fraction from ferrous scrap |
NL2002736C2 (en) * | 2009-04-09 | 2010-10-12 | Univ Delft Tech | Method for separating magnetic pieces of material. |
WO2010117271A1 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2010-10-14 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Use of an apparatus for separating magnetic pieces of material |
US8678194B2 (en) | 2009-04-09 | 2014-03-25 | Technische Universiteit Delft | Use of an apparatus for separating magnetic pieces of material |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1878505B1 (en) | 2010-06-16 |
DE602006014960D1 (en) | 2010-07-29 |
EP2206558B1 (en) | 2011-11-16 |
ATE471213T1 (en) | 2010-07-15 |
ATE533560T1 (en) | 2011-12-15 |
DK1878505T3 (en) | 2010-09-27 |
ES2346145T3 (en) | 2010-10-11 |
EP2206558A1 (en) | 2010-07-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1878505A1 (en) | Process and device for the separation of fragments of liberated ferrous scrap from not liberated ferrous scrap fragments by means of a static magnet | |
US8678194B2 (en) | Use of an apparatus for separating magnetic pieces of material | |
CN102294297B (en) | Magnetic suspension beneficiation combined method for recycling copper from copper melting converter slag | |
CN201676747U (en) | Belt type deferrization machine | |
CN211887396U (en) | Waste metal sorting device | |
CN102553707A (en) | Process for separating lean-magnetite fine ore | |
CN101422752A (en) | Method for reducing the level of reselection tailings | |
CN108212464B (en) | Crushing and sorting equipment and process thereof | |
EP1431464B1 (en) | Method for recycling of a counterweight | |
CN112791848B (en) | Method for reducing ilmenite flotation difficulty in process of recycling ilmenite from iron ore dressing tailings | |
US8201694B2 (en) | Eddy current separator | |
US20240060152A1 (en) | Method and system of reducing non-ferrous metal content of scrap steel | |
KR20210060774A (en) | Nonferrous metal screening system using eddy current. | |
CN104722399A (en) | Magnetic separator for separating impurities from rare earth permanent magnetic material | |
CN209317903U (en) | The bored slag drum belt magnetic separator of heat | |
US20160024612A1 (en) | Method And Device For Obtaining Pure, Additive-Free Scrap Iron From A Mixture Of Comminuted Scrap Metal | |
CN201295640Y (en) | Three-extrusion strong force permanent magnetic roller type magnetic separator | |
JP4736504B2 (en) | Recovery method of granular iron in slag | |
US4883584A (en) | Process of separating special steel components from lump shredder scrap | |
CN2751893Y (en) | Bipolar deironing device | |
WO2005017217A3 (en) | Recycling process for steel works coarse sludge or dusts using gravimetric concentration | |
CN205988817U (en) | Non-ferrous metal sorting unit | |
CN204769113U (en) | Magnet separator of impurity among separation tombarthite magnetically hard material | |
CN220573727U (en) | Eddy current separator | |
CN102439180A (en) | Method and apparatus for separating non-ferrous metal containing fractions from ferrous scrap |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20080225 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080424 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602006014960 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20100729 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2346145 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20100616 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100917 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101018 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100731 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101016 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100731 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100731 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110317 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602006014960 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110316 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100713 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20110801 Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20120727 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100616 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101217 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20120731 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20120731 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20120703 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20120829 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20120831 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20120814 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20120725 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20121001 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20120727 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20120725 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100916 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT DELFT Effective date: 20130731 Owner name: RECYCLING AVENUE Effective date: 20130731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20140201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20130731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 471213 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20130713 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20130713 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602006014960 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20140331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130713 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130731 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140201 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140201 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130714 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130713 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130713 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20140909 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130714 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130713 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130713 |