[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1844865B1 - Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets - Google Patents

Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1844865B1
EP1844865B1 EP06007488A EP06007488A EP1844865B1 EP 1844865 B1 EP1844865 B1 EP 1844865B1 EP 06007488 A EP06007488 A EP 06007488A EP 06007488 A EP06007488 A EP 06007488A EP 1844865 B1 EP1844865 B1 EP 1844865B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
individual
individual objects
inspection
identifier
sorting
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP06007488A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1844865A1 (fr
Inventor
Wolfgang Konstantin Baldauf
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BCS machine vision GmbH
Original Assignee
BCS machine vision GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by BCS machine vision GmbH filed Critical BCS machine vision GmbH
Priority to EP06007488A priority Critical patent/EP1844865B1/fr
Priority to AT06007488T priority patent/ATE439919T1/de
Priority to DE502006004583T priority patent/DE502006004583D1/de
Publication of EP1844865A1 publication Critical patent/EP1844865A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1844865B1 publication Critical patent/EP1844865B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07CPOSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
    • B07C5/00Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for the automatic inspection and sorting of products made in coherent object assemblies, particularly applicable but not exclusive to multi-use sheets in the printing industry, e.g. Banknotes, stamps, identity cards, batches, check forms and folding cartons, and wherever automatic verification and sorting of such products is required, which are initially grouped together during the manufacturing process and only then separated into several individual products.
  • the inspection is carried out at such points of the manufacturing process, where the specimens are still present in the connected to object associations form, however, the sorting is performed based on the test results determined only after the separation into individual objects. In the simplest case, those individual products which had previously been identified as defective are selectively sorted out.
  • inspection systems are often used to automatically detect and sort out faulty products. They consist of sensors with their associated processing units. This can be electronic cameras with lighting and image processing computers, but also other sensors for the detection of special quality characteristics and physical quantities of the product.
  • the inspection system is attached to the material flow transporters, either directly on the production machines (eg in printing presses) or in separate inspection machines (eg Drudcbogen inspection machines).
  • test object is an object group consisting of several interconnected individual objects, which is later separated into individual objects, and if only individual subobjects are faulty, one does not want to discard the entire object group for cost reasons. Therefore, a method is often used in which the quality inspection is performed only in the sorting system for individual objects, ie only after the separation of the object association into individual objects.
  • the inspection system is located here in the individual object sorting device itself and controls the sorting gates correspond to the test results directly, so must make no mark.
  • checking only in the single-object sorting machine has the following disadvantage.
  • the production takes place in several successive steps on separate machines (for example, production machine ⁇ punching machine ⁇ sorting machine). Between the individual stages of the manufacturing process passes through intermediate storage and transport of the products a lot of time until the separated individual objects get into the sorting device. If the inspection takes place there and there is no automatic error detection on the individual production machines themselves, systematic manufacturing defects often remain undetected for a long time, which entails high costs.
  • the inspection should be carried out as close to the production as possible, preferably directly on the production machines, in order to enable fast, immediate error feedback on the manufacturing process, either automatically or via the operating personnel, by immediately displaying faults optically and acoustically.
  • a rejection of faulty individual objects is not yet possible at this time, as these are still in the object group (eg in a printed sheet) together with maybe error-free neighbor individual objects.
  • printing presses or sheet inspection machines can be ejected only entire object associations (eg banknote sheets) which contain at least one faulty individual object (eg banknote). A rejection of individual faulty individual objects is not possible at this point.
  • the banknotes marked thereby as faulty can be treated in the same way later after the singling as in the above-mentioned manual marking, ie the individual marked banknotes can be automatically ejected after being cut into single notes on the basis of their marking in a banknote sorting machine.
  • Another disadvantage of this previous method is that it does not allow to sort individual objects according to quality categories or other test criteria, since there are only "good” or "bad” and the "bad” marked individual objects by the invalidity mark (reject mark) already have been rendered unusable.
  • the inventive solution consists in a kind of "electronic marking", whereby existing individual identifications (eg serial numbers) or already existing individual features of the individual objects (eg subtle differences in printing and paper structures) are recorded as so-called identifiers or individual identifications (eg serial numbers) the individual objects are attached as identifiers, further the respective inspection information from the inspection is assigned to these identifiers (individual characteristics or labels) stored, further these data packets are transmitted to the individual object sorting device, where after cutting the individual objects based on their identifiers using a sensor be recognized and sorted according to the received associated test data or ejected.
  • identifiers eg serial numbers
  • individual identifications eg serial numbers
  • individual identifications eg serial numbers
  • an essential feature of this method is that the marking does not take place physically on the tested individual object itself, but indirectly in a data record in which each individual object is represented by its identifier.
  • the individual object is either not marked at all or merely carries an individualizing code (for example a serial number, a barcode or 2D code) for later identification without any information from the test result.
  • an individualizing code for example a serial number, a barcode or 2D code
  • an invisible identification code e.g. with UV fluorescent ink or by affixing to the back of products such as Fattschachteln.
  • the advantages of the present invention is that no invalidating markings must be placed on the test piece and that an additional classifying sorting into categories corresponding to the checking results and results of the inspection is possible beyond simply rejecting faulty individual items is made because the test results are not necessarily binary, they can also be provided in detail to the sorter.
  • Another advantage is that it is also possible to attach inspection systems to production machines which do not offer the possibility of discharging faulty object assemblies, for example on printing presses without activatable additional sheet diverter with false-sheet stacker.
  • Fig. 1 shows above as an example as a typical object association (1) a printed sheet consisting of connected individual objects (2) and an unused edge.
  • the lower part of the illustration 1 shows the individual objects (3) after cutting, with the unused edge portions are waste.
  • Identification codes (6, 4) or other individual features (5) may be located both on the unused edge of the object association (1) and on the individual objects (2, 3) themselves, which permit their unambiguous identification.
  • a printing of the test results (7) on the edge of the object group (1) take place, whereby it serves as an information buffer until it is divided into separate individual objects (3).
  • This imprint (7) can contain not only the coordinates of faulty individual objects (2) but also more detailed check information.
  • Fig. 2 shows the principle of this method.
  • object associations (1) eg printed sheets
  • individual objects (2) eg banknote sheets or folding box sheets.
  • These are checked by an inspection and identification system (20) and provided with "electronic marks" (29), for each individual object (2) the test result (27) together with the identifier (28), an individual feature (5) or Identification code (4), electronically stored and transmitted to the sorting electronics (71).
  • the sorting electronics (71) After the object grouping (1) has been divided by a cutting device (60) into separate individual objects (3), these are recognized in the sorting system (70) by means of an identification sensor (73) and by means of the sorting electronics (71) by an electronic mark (29 ) corresponding switch control (72) in the sorting device (80) discharged.
  • Fig. 3 shows the first of six embodiments.
  • the inspection and identification system (20a) is that an individual identification (4) on each individual object (2) of the object association (1) with knowledge of the inspection system (21) or by itself by means of a Einzel Market-Identtechnikscode- Printer (22) (eg inkjet or laser) is attached, such as a serial number or other identification code (eg bar code or 3D code) with visible or invisible ink, such as UV-fluorescent or IR ink.
  • This individual object identifier (4) is applied in such a way that the respective test result (27) of this individual object identifier (4) can be assigned as an identifier (28).
  • the electronic tag (29) consists in this case of the individual identification (4) and the associated test result (27).
  • the separated individual objects (3) enter the sorting system (70). There, a sensor (74) is installed, which reads the applied individual identifications (4) as an identifier (28). In the sorting electronics (71), the check information (27) assigned in the electronic brand (29) is determined and from this the sorting decision for the point control (72) is made.
  • Fig. 4 shows the second of six embodiments.
  • an already existing individual identifier (4) eg a serial number
  • the connected individual object (2) thus already carries the individual marking (4) when passing through the inspection and identification system (20b) because it has already been attached in a preceding production step.
  • the detection of these existing markings (4) is carried out by one or more individual object identification code reader (23).
  • As an identifier (28) this information is then sent to the sorting electronics (71) together with the test result (27) for each individual object (2). transfer. After the cutting and separating device (60), the isolated individual objects (3) enter the sorting system (70).
  • an identification code reader (74) which reads the individual identifiers (4) as an identifier (28).
  • the check information (27) assigned in the electronic brand (29) is determined and from this the sorting decision for the point control (72) is made.
  • Fig. 5 shows the third of six embodiments.
  • another already existing recognizable individual feature (5) of the single object (2) is used as the identifier (28), such as the texture of the paper or microscopic differences in the print image.
  • Each connected individual object (2) thus carries on passing through the inspection and identification system (20c) already an individual feature (5), which is there detected by one or more individual object feature readers (24).
  • As an identifier (28), this information is then transmitted together with the test result (27) for each individual object (2) to the sorting electronics (71).
  • the isolated individual objects (3) enter the sorting system (70).
  • a feature reader (75) which recognizes the individual features (5) as an identifier (28).
  • the check information (27) assigned in the electronic brand (29) is determined and from this the sorting decision for the point control (72) is made.
  • Fig. 6 shows the fourth of six embodiments.
  • the individual objects (2) are initially not individually marked, but the object associations (1) receive an individual identification code (6) with an object association identification code printer (50).
  • an object association identification code printer 50
  • Each object association (1) thus receives an object association identification code (6) printed as individual identification when passing the inspection and identification system (20d), whereby each individual object (2) on this object association (1) together with the coordinates of its position (26) is clearly defined within the object association.
  • This so-called pre-identifier (14) thus consists, for example, of the sheet number together with the row and the column of the individual object within the sheet.
  • a numbering device (40) before the cutting device (60) an individual marking (41) of the objects (eg by printing a serial number on each connected individual object (2)).
  • the separated individual objects (3) enter the sorting system (70).
  • an identification code reader (74) which reads the individual identifiers (4) as identifiers (28).
  • the check information (27) assigned in the electronic brand (29) is determined and from this the sorting decision for the point control (72) is made.
  • Fig. 7 shows the fifth of six embodiments.
  • the object associations (1) already carry object association identification codes (6), but the individual objects (2) are initially not yet individually marked. This means that, for example, already sheet numbers on are printed on the unused margin of the sheet.
  • Each object association (1) thus carries an object association identification code (6) as an individual identification when passing the inspection and identification system (20e), whereby each connected individual object (2) together with its position (26) within the object association (1) unambiguously is defined.
  • This so-called pre-identifier (14) thus consists, for example, of the sheet number together with the row and the column of the individual object within the sheet.
  • Fig. 8 shows the sixth of six embodiments.
  • an identification code (6) and an Errormatrixcode (7) with an inkjet or laser printer (52) is applied to the object association (1).
  • this may be a signature number on the unused margin, along with a code indicating the location of erroneous items (2) describes the object association (1) and, if necessary, the error type.
  • the detailed test result (27) can be assigned to this identifier (28), but does not have to be. In the latter case, only a binary good / bad decision results, the individual objects (2) indexed by the erratrix matrix code (7) are rejected on the basis of their serial number.
  • the electronic tag (29) is stored as a serial number (41, 4) + test result (27) or only as a serial number (41, 4) of defective individual objects and transmitted to the sorting electronics (71).
  • the isolated individual objects (3) enter the sorting system (70).
  • an identification code reader (74) which reads the individual identifiers (4) as an identifier (28).
  • a sorting decision for switch control (72) is made on the basis of the electronic mark (29).
  • the inspection and identification system (20, 20a-f) combines almost the two functions of checking with an inspection system (21) and identifying by attaching or determining an individual item identifier (28).
  • the individual object sorting system (70) consists of a sorting device (80) with points which are controlled (72) by sorting electronics (71).
  • the sorting electronics (71) receives the read individual object identifier (28) from the identification sensor (73), which is either an identification code reader (74) or as a feature sensor (75), in particular likewise image processing units consisting of electronic camera with illumination and image processing computer appropriate evaluation software.
  • the isolated individual objects (3) are correspondingly sorted or rejected on the basis of their identifiers (28) and the associated verification information (27) stored in the electronic tag (29).

Landscapes

  • Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
  • Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
  • Discharge Of Articles From Conveyors (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Procédé destiné à contrôler, marquer et trier individuellement des objets (2,3) qui sont fabriqués en unités d'objets (1) liés entre eux, sont déjà contrôlés automatiquement dans cet état et triés dans un dispositif de tri seulement après la séparation en objets individuels isolés (3) en raison des résultats de contrôle obtenus préalablement, utilisable en particulier dans l'imprimerie pour des feuilles d'impression avec flan imprimé comme les billets de banque, les timbres, les pièces d'identité, les billets de loterie, les formulaires de chèques et les boîtes pliantes, caractérisé par le fait que les objets isolés reliés (2) ne sont pas pourvus de marques de rejet (reject marks) mais que les résultats de contrôle (27) obtenus par le système d'inspection sont associés et sauvegardés avec des différences reconnaissables propres aux objets individuels, appelées identificateurs (28), et que ces enregistrements sont transmis en tant que marques électroniques indirectes (29) à l'électronique de tri (71) du système de tri (70), où les objets individuels isolés (3) transportés sont reconnus au moyen d'un capteur d'identification (73) en raison de leurs identificateurs (28) et sont triés par un pilotage (72) d'au moins un dispositif de séparation correspondant aux résultats de contrôle (27) enregistrés s'y rapportant.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que des codes d'identification individuels (4) sont apposés sur les objets individuels reliés (2) au moyen de têtes d'impression (22), et que ces identificateurs (28, 4) sont reconnus au moyen d'un capteur de lecture (74) sur les objets individuels isolés (3).
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que des codes d'identification individuels déjà présents (4) sont lus au moyen de capteurs de lecture (23) sur les objets individuels reliés (2) et ces identificateurs (28,4) sont reconnus au moyen d'un capteur de lecture (74) sur les objets individuels isolés (3).
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que des signes distinctifs individuels (5) des objets individuels reliés (2) sont obtenus au moyen de capteurs de signes distinctifs (24) et que ces identificateurs (28,5) sont reconnus au moyen de capteurs de signes distinctifs (75) sur les objets individuels isolés (3).
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait qu'une identification individuelle (6) est imprimée sur le bord de l'unité d'objets au moyen d'une imprimante de code d'identification de l'unité d'objets (50), et que le résultat de contrôle est d'abord affecté à un pré-identificateur (14) constitué de cette identification de l'unité d'objets (6) et de la position (26) de l'objet individuel relié (2) à l'intérieur de l'unité d'objets (1), et caractérisé par le fait que le pré-identificateur (14) est remplacé en amont du dispositif de découpage (60) par un code d'identification d'objet individuel (41,4) introduit dans un dispositif de numérotation (40) en tant qu'identificateur (28).
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait qu'un lecteur de code d'identification de l'unité d'objets (51) lit une identification individuelle déjà présente (6) sur le bord de l'unité d'objets, et que le résultat de contrôle (27) est d'abord attribué à un pré-identificateur (14) constitué de cette identification de l'unité d'objets (6) et de la position (26) de l'objet individuel relié (2) à l'intérieur de l'unité d'objets (1), et caractérisé par le fait que le pré-identificateur (14) est remplacé en amont du dispositif de découpage (60) par un code d'identification d'objet individuel (41,4) introduit dans un dispositif de numérotation (40) en tant qu'identificateur (28).
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé par le fait que l'affectation des résultats de contrôle (27) aux objets individuels reliés (2) est d'abord enregistrée du fait que les positions (26) des objets individuels défectueux (2) à l'intérieur de l'unité d'objets (1) sont enregistrées sur le bord non utilisé de l'unité d'objets (1) au moyen d'une tête d'impression (52), et que cette information (7) est lue en amont du dispositif de découpage (60) par un capteur (56), et que des marques électroniques (29) sont produites à l'aide des numéros de série imprimés (41) à partir du dispositif de numérotation des objets individuels (40), ces marques étant constituées du résultat de contrôle (27) et du code d'identification d'objet individuel (41, 4) en tant qu'identificateurs (28).
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, caractérisé par le fait que l'impression sur le bord de la feuille comporte en outre des résultats de contrôle.
  9. Procédé selon les revendications 1 à 8, dans lequel le système d'inspection (20, 21) prévient l'utilisateur par un signal visuel ou sonore en cas de défaut.
  10. Procédé selon les revendications 1 à 9, dans lequel le résultat de contrôle du système d'inspection (20, 21) est couplé rétroactivement sur le dispositif de production situé en amont afin de le régler à nouveau de manière correspondante.
EP06007488A 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets Not-in-force EP1844865B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06007488A EP1844865B1 (fr) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets
AT06007488T ATE439919T1 (de) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Elektronisches markieren zum sortieren von in objektverbänden hergestellten und geprüften einzelobjekten
DE502006004583T DE502006004583D1 (de) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Elektronisches Markieren zum Sortieren von in Objektverbänden hergestellten und geprüften Einzelobjekten

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP06007488A EP1844865B1 (fr) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1844865A1 EP1844865A1 (fr) 2007-10-17
EP1844865B1 true EP1844865B1 (fr) 2009-08-19

Family

ID=36791576

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06007488A Not-in-force EP1844865B1 (fr) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1844865B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE439919T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE502006004583D1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019122578A1 (de) * 2019-08-22 2021-02-25 Plock Metallwerke GmbH & Co. KG Verfahren zum Prüfen, Markieren und Sortieren von Einzelobjekten
DE202019005909U1 (de) 2019-08-22 2023-03-28 Plock Metallwerke GmbH & Co. KG Anordnung zum Prüfen, Markieren und Sortieren von Einzelobjekten

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2107506A1 (fr) 2008-04-02 2009-10-07 BCS machine vision GmbH Procédé d'identification sans caractéristique d'objets uniformes dans des lignes de production
DE102009016289A1 (de) 2009-01-02 2010-07-15 Singulus Technologies Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Identifizierung von Gegenständen sowie zum Verfolgen von Gegenständen in einem Produktionsprozess
EP2414111A1 (fr) * 2009-04-03 2012-02-08 Singulus Technologies AG Procédé et dispositif d'identification d'objets et de suivi d'objets dans un processus de production
AT508159B1 (de) * 2009-06-05 2010-11-15 Starlinger & Co Gmbh Fehlerstellenerkennung
DE102012023391A1 (de) * 2012-11-30 2014-06-05 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Qualitätskontrollsystem für eine Druckmaschine
DE102019110853B4 (de) 2019-04-26 2022-05-12 Koenig & Bauer Ag Bogenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines verbliebenen und von einer Formgebungseinrichtung bearbeiteten Teils zumindest eines Bogens
DE102019110854A1 (de) * 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens und Vorrichtungen zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens
DE102021114252A1 (de) 2021-06-02 2022-12-08 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Ausschleusung und/oder Entnahme fehlerhafter Nutzen

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4992649A (en) * 1988-09-30 1991-02-12 United States Postal Service Remote video scanning automated sorting system
FR2841673B1 (fr) * 2002-06-26 2004-12-03 Solystic Chronomarquage d'objets postaux par signature d'image et machine de tri associee

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019122578A1 (de) * 2019-08-22 2021-02-25 Plock Metallwerke GmbH & Co. KG Verfahren zum Prüfen, Markieren und Sortieren von Einzelobjekten
DE202019005909U1 (de) 2019-08-22 2023-03-28 Plock Metallwerke GmbH & Co. KG Anordnung zum Prüfen, Markieren und Sortieren von Einzelobjekten
DE102019122578B4 (de) 2019-08-22 2023-08-17 Plock Metallwerke GmbH & Co. KG Verfahren zum Prüfen, Markieren und Sortieren von Einzelobjekten

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1844865A1 (fr) 2007-10-17
ATE439919T1 (de) 2009-09-15
DE502006004583D1 (de) 2009-10-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1844865B1 (fr) Marquage électronique pour le tri d'objets individuels, fabriqués et vérifiés en groupement d'objets
DE69319219T2 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Prüfen von Drucksachen
EP1642244B1 (fr) Dispositifs de controle qualite de feuilles
EP2107506A1 (fr) Procédé d'identification sans caractéristique d'objets uniformes dans des lignes de production
DE69325339T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Unterscheidung von Artikeln wie Briefumschläge
EP1810251B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de traitement de billets de banque
DE4000603A1 (de) Verfahren zur zwischenspeicherung von gegenstaenden, wie briefen, belegen o.ae. in einem automatischen lesesystem
DE2749641A1 (de) Einrichtung zur automatischen identifizierung von insbesondere papiergeld
WO2008053024A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour identifier des envois
EP2128793A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à vérifier des produits d'impression, programme informatique et produit de programme informatique
DE3614548C2 (fr)
EP1785276B1 (fr) Système de contrôle de la qualité pour une machine à imprimer
DE2921862A1 (de) Maschine fuer die automatische qualitaetskontrolle an frisch gedruckten banknoten und wertpapieren
WO2001099059A1 (fr) Dispositif de traitement de produits en feuille
DE10049432A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Annahme von Blattgut
DE69811460T2 (de) Druck und Endbearbeitung von Dokumenten
EP1918104A2 (fr) Procédé destiné à la vérification d'une impression et dispositif de vérification d'impression
DE102009060515A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Sortieren von Gegenständen verschiedener Formatklassen
EP2393065A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour vérifier si la surface d'un objet est pourvue d'un document de valeur
DE102005037497A1 (de) Kennzeichnungssystem und Qualitäts- und Kennzeichnungsverfahren für eine Bogendruckmaschine
WO2007107234A1 (fr) Systeme de traitement d'images pour machine d'impression
EP2180959B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de traitement d'objets sur lesquels des informations sont appliquées
DE102017109496B4 (de) Produkt-Detektions-Vorrichtung
DE102006028482A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Markierung von Druckbogen mit fehlerhaften Einzelnutzen beim Nutzendruck
DE102020120962B4 (de) Erkennungsverfahren und Erkennungssystem zum eindeutigen Erkennen eines Objekts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: ELECTRONIC MARKING TO SORT SINGLE OBJECTS WHICH ARE PRODUCED AND INSPECTED IN CONNECTED OBJECT UNITS

AKX Designation fees paid
17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080813

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502006004583

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20091001

Kind code of ref document: P

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20090819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091219

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091130

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091119

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20100520

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091120

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BCS MACHINE VISION G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20100430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: AEN

Free format text: DAS PATENT IST AUFGRUND DES WEITERBEHANDLUNGSANTRAGS VOM 08.12.2010 REAKTIVIERT WORDEN.

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100410

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20101230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20101208

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20101021

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100410

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110430

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100410

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100220

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 439919

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110410

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110410

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502006004583

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121101