EP1739235A2 - Restraint system - Google Patents
Restraint system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1739235A2 EP1739235A2 EP06114995A EP06114995A EP1739235A2 EP 1739235 A2 EP1739235 A2 EP 1739235A2 EP 06114995 A EP06114995 A EP 06114995A EP 06114995 A EP06114995 A EP 06114995A EP 1739235 A2 EP1739235 A2 EP 1739235A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- restraint system
- concrete
- layer
- wall
- gravel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/04—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of longitudinal beams or rigid strips supported above ground at spaced points
- E01F15/0476—Foundations
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/081—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material
- E01F15/083—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material using concrete
Definitions
- the invention relates to a restraint system for motor vehicles, which is provided at a roadway boundary.
- Graded concrete protection walls are subject to DIN EN 1317-2 of April 1998. DIN defines different requirements, in particular with regard to the retention of lorries. For example, in the case of a requirement for H2 according to the above standard, trucks up to a total weight of 15 tons must be withheld.
- a concrete protection wall meeting the requirement H2 is in " Road Traffic Engineering "3/99, pp. 120-123 described.
- the profile of this concrete protective wall has a lower step with a height of approx. 250 mm and a deviation from the vertical of approx. 9 °, a middle step with a height of approx. 50 mm and a deviation from the vertical of approx. 50 ° and an upper step with a height of 600 mm and a deviation from the vertical of about 9 °.
- the width of the top of this concrete protection wall is about 200 mm.
- the total height of this concrete protection wall is thus approx. 900 mm.
- the object of the invention is to provide a restraint system for motor vehicles, which has good retention properties, in particular a containment level of at least H2 and is easy and inexpensive to produce.
- the restraint system for motor vehicles has a stepped concrete protective wall.
- the concrete protection wall has at least two, preferably three stages.
- the upper stage here has a smaller average width than the lower stage. If the concrete protection wall has more than two stages, the average width of the steps decreases from bottom to top.
- the Outer walls inclined relative to a vertical, the inclination of the road facing side facing away from the bottom facing away from the roadway.
- the restraint system according to the invention thus has a roadway-independent, compacted, formed as an unbound support layer uprising element on which the concrete protective wall is placed.
- Restraint systems according to the invention have the particular advantage that they can be produced considerably less expensively, since unbound support layers, for example, can only be produced by solidifying suitable materials such as gravel, gravel and / or recycling materials.
- suitable materials such as gravel, gravel and / or recycling materials.
- the particular prefabricated concrete protection walls can thus be placed on the uprising element in a simple manner. Clamping in the road or anchoring in the ground is not required. The installation of such concrete protection walls is therefore considerably cheaper.
- the restraint system for motor vehicles according to the invention which is provided on road boundaries, has in a particularly preferred embodiment a stepped concrete protection wall, the first stage has a height of 150 - 250 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of 8 - 10 °.
- a middle step has a height of 40-60 mm, preferably of about 50 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of about 50 °.
- An upper step has a height of 600-700 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of 8-10 °.
- at least three preferably five reinforcing bars or probing ropes are provided in the concrete protective wall, preferably in the upper stage.
- the restraint system further comprises an intermediate layer or an intermediate strip which is arranged between the footing foundation and the roadway or the side strip of the roadway.
- This may be an uncompressed intermediate strip, which in particular is not sealed. In this respect, rainwater can seep into this area.
- the invention thus has the further advantage that no costly and expensive drainage measures are required.
- a base layer without binder does not act as a water barrier, so that, regardless of whether an intermediate strip is provided or not, the drainage of the water is ensured.
- the support layer according to the invention is preferably a compacted gravel and / or gravel layer.
- a recycling layer is preferably a layer that meets the technical delivery conditions for rocks in road construction. Corresponding definitions are given in particular in " Technishce Delivery conditions for aggregates in road construction, TL Gestein-FtB 04, the Road and Transportation Research Association for Road Construction, published by FGSV-Verlag, 2004 edition defined in particular in chapter 1.3.2. Furthermore, corresponding definitions for recycling layers of DIN EM 13242 "aggregates for unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures for engineering and road construction" can be taken. Such layers are in particular compacted with at least 95% Proctor, in particular at least 97% Proctor.
- the width of the individual steps is continuously reduced from bottom to top, so that in particular smooth outer surfaces are formed. It is particularly preferred that the concrete protective wall has the same contour on both sides and thus is in particular symmetrical to a median plane.
- the preferably three, in particular five rebars preferably have a distance of about 100 mm to each other. It is particularly preferable to arrange all reinforcing bars in a vertical plane, ie one above the other. Preferably, the reinforcing bars are arranged along a vertical center line, or in a vertical center plane. In this case, the upper reinforcing rod preferably has a distance to the top of the concrete protective wall of about 150 mm.
- the reinforcing bars or reinforcing cables are in a preferred embodiment above the arranged upper level and extend in the longitudinal direction of the concrete protective wall.
- the lower stage only has a height of about 150 mm. Possibly.
- the step may also have less than 150 mm, in particular less than 120 mm.
- This invention is independent of whether it is a clamped or unclamped concrete protective wall. It is particularly preferred to combine this invention with the invention described above.
- This invention is based on the problem that concrete protection walls, in particular concrete protection walls with high containment levels cause a very abrupt, little damped deceleration of the vehicle.
- the concrete protection walls should not be displaceable depending on the retention level up to clearly defined forces, in order to be able to provide them, for example, between motorway lanes, dangerous embankments, etc. It is therefore the object to improve the damping of the motor vehicle, in particular to prevent injury to the occupants or to reduce the severity of injuries.
- this can be achieved by a lower lower step of the stepped concrete protective wall.
- the lower level of the concrete protection wall has a height which is lower than the height of a car axle.
- the above dimensions may vary by ⁇ 20 mm, preferably only ⁇ 10 mm.
- the inclination may preferably vary by ⁇ 1 gon.
- the diameter of the reinforcing bars or the reinforcing ropes is preferably 10 - 16 mm.
- a steel bar Bst 500 S is used.
- a concrete protective wall has a lower step 10, a middle step 12 and an upper step 14.
- the upper stage 14 three reinforcing bars 16 are provided, which are aligned horizontally.
- the reinforcing bars 16 are arranged parallel to each other in a vertical center plane 18.
- An upper side 20 of the concrete protection wall has a width of 180 mm. Due to the selected angle and the remaining dimensions of the concrete protective wall results in a width of a support side 22 of 542 mm.
- the above-described concrete protective wall on an uprising element 24, for example made of concrete, Gravel and / or gravel is set up.
- Fig. 2 preferred embodiment of the invention is a restraint system that meets the requirements of the H2 Stability according to the Euronorm 1317-2. Corresponding experiments have already been carried out.
- the essential difference of this embodiment with respect to the embodiment described with reference to FIG. 1 is that in the upper stage 14 not three but five reinforcing bars 16 are provided in the longitudinal direction of the concrete protective wall.
- the reinforcing bars have a diameter of 16 mm and consist of steel BSt 500S.
- the base layer 24 is frost-resistant and consists of gravel and / or gravel and / or suitable recycled material.
- the base course was compacted with at least 97% Proctor.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Input Circuits Of Receivers And Coupling Of Receivers And Audio Equipment (AREA)
- Exchange Systems With Centralized Control (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
- Tents Or Canopies (AREA)
- Jellies, Jams, And Syrups (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Rückhaltesystem für Kraftfahrzeuge, das an einer Fahrbahnbegrenzung vorgesehen ist.The invention relates to a restraint system for motor vehicles, which is provided at a roadway boundary.
Neben Rückhaltesystemen aus Metall sind Betonschutzwände zur Fahrbahnbegrenzung bekannt. Abgestufte Betonschutzwände unterliegen der DIN EN 1317-2 vom April 1998. In der DIN sind unterschiedliche Anforderungen, insbesondere hinsichtlich des Zurückhaltens von LKWs, definiert. Beispielsweise bei einer Anforderung nach H2 gemäß der vorstehenden Norm müssen LKWs bis zu einem Gesamtgewicht von 15 t zurückgehalten werden.In addition to restraint systems made of metal concrete protection walls are known for road boundary. Graded concrete protection walls are subject to DIN EN 1317-2 of April 1998. DIN defines different requirements, in particular with regard to the retention of lorries. For example, in the case of a requirement for H2 according to the above standard, trucks up to a total weight of 15 tons must be withheld.
Eine die Anforderung H2 erfüllende Betonschutzwand ist in "
Um die Aufhaltestufe H2 nach der Euronorm 1317-2 zu erreichen und ein Verschieben von Betonschutzwänden zu vermeiden, werden diese in die Fahrbahn eingespannt. Die untere Stufe der Betonschutzwand ragt somit in den Fahrbahnbelag hinein, bzw. ist in diesen eingebunden. Das Einspannen von Betonschutzwänden hat jedoch den Nachteil, dass auf beiden Seiten der Betonschutzwand die Fahrbahn ausgebildet sein muss. Dies ist an Fahrbahnrändern sehr aufwändig und erhöht die Kosten.In order to reach the containment stage H2 according to the Euronorm 1317-2 and to avoid a shifting of concrete protection walls, these are in the Roadway clamped. The lower level of the concrete protection wall thus protrudes into the road surface, or is integrated in this. However, the clamping of concrete protective walls has the disadvantage that on both sides of the concrete protective wall, the roadway must be formed. This is very complicated at the edges of the road and increases the costs.
Ferner ist es aus
Aufgabe der Erfindung ist es, ein Rückhaltesystem für Kraftfahrzeuge zu schaffen, das gute Aufhalteeigenschaften, insbesondere eine Aufhaltestufe von mindestens H2 aufweist und einfach und kostengünstig herstellbar ist.The object of the invention is to provide a restraint system for motor vehicles, which has good retention properties, in particular a containment level of at least H2 and is easy and inexpensive to produce.
Die Lösung der Aufgabe erfolgt erfindungsgemäß durch die Merkmale des Anspruchs 1.The object is achieved according to the invention by the features of claim 1.
Das erfindungsgemäße Rückhaltesystem für Kraftfahrzeuge weist eine abgestufte Betonschutzwand auf. Die Betonschutzwand weist mindestens zwei, vorzugsweise drei Stufen auf. Die obere Stufe weist hierbei eine geringere mittlere Breite als die untere Stufe auf. Sofern die Betonschutzwand mehr als zwei Stufen aufweist, nimmt die mittlere Breite der Stufen von unten nach oben ab. Vorzugsweise sind zumindest bei einem Teil der Stufen, die Außenwände gegenüber einer Vertikalen geneigt, wobei die Neigung der der Fahrbahn zugewandten Seite von unten nach oben gesehen, von der Fahrbahn wegweist.The restraint system for motor vehicles according to the invention has a stepped concrete protective wall. The concrete protection wall has at least two, preferably three stages. The upper stage here has a smaller average width than the lower stage. If the concrete protection wall has more than two stages, the average width of the steps decreases from bottom to top. Preferably, at least for a part of the stages, the Outer walls inclined relative to a vertical, the inclination of the road facing side facing away from the bottom facing away from the roadway.
Bisher wurde davon ausgegangen, dass es zur Erzielung einer Aufhaltestufe von H2 erzwingend erforderlich ist, die Betonschutzwand in die Fahrbahn einzuspannen. Untersuchungen haben jedoch ergeben, dass überraschenderweise die erfindungsgemäße Betonschutzwand nicht in die Fahrbahn eingespannt werden muss, wobei ein wesentlicher Aspekt um dies zu erzielen das Vorsehen von mehreren Bewehrungselementen, insbesondere Bewehrungsstäben ist. Das erfindungsgemäße Rückhaltesystem weist somit ein fahrbahnunabhängiges, verdichtetes, als ungebundene Tragschicht ausgebildetes Aufstandelement auf, auf das die Betonschutzwand aufgestellt ist.So far, it was assumed that to achieve a containment level of H2 is urgently necessary to clamp the concrete protection wall in the roadway. Investigations have shown, however, that, surprisingly, the concrete protective wall according to the invention does not have to be clamped in the roadway, an essential aspect in order to achieve this is the provision of a plurality of reinforcing elements, in particular reinforcing bars. The restraint system according to the invention thus has a roadway-independent, compacted, formed as an unbound support layer uprising element on which the concrete protective wall is placed.
Überraschenderweise können mit dem erfindungsgemäßen Rückhaltesystem gute Aufhalteeigenschaften erzielt werden. Dies ist insbesondere überraschend, da beim Vorsehen einer ungebundenen Tragschicht die Betonschutzwand bei einem Aufprall wegkippt und somit davon auszugehen wäre, dass nur schlechte Aufhalteeigenschaften erzielbar sind. Dies ist jedoch nicht der Fall. Überraschenderweise ist es insbesondere bei einer Betonschutzwand mit mindestens fünf Bewehrungsstäben oder Bewehrungsseilen möglich, die Aufhaltestufe H2 zu erzielen.Surprisingly, good retention properties can be achieved with the retention system according to the invention. This is particularly surprising, since when providing an unbound support layer, the concrete protection wall tilts away in the event of an impact and it would therefore be assumed that only poor retention properties can be achieved. This is not the case. Surprisingly, it is possible, in particular in the case of a concrete protective wall with at least five reinforcing bars or reinforcing ropes, to achieve the containment stage H2.
Erfindungsgemäße Rückhaltesysteme haben insbesondere den Vorteil, dass sie erheblich kostengünstiger herstellbar sind, da ungebundene Tragschichten, beispielsweise lediglich durch Verfestigung geeigneter Materialien wie Schotter, Kies und/oder Recyclingstoffen, hergestellt werden können. Das Gießen eines Betonfundaments oder das Verbreitern der Fahrbahn, um eine feste gebundene Aufstandsfläche herzustellen, ist erfindungsgemäß nicht erforderlich.Restraint systems according to the invention have the particular advantage that they can be produced considerably less expensively, since unbound support layers, for example, can only be produced by solidifying suitable materials such as gravel, gravel and / or recycling materials. The casting of a concrete foundation or the widening of the road to produce a fixed bonded footprint is not required according to the invention.
Die insbesondere vorgefertigten Betonschutzwände können somit auf einfache Weise auf das Aufstandelement aufgestellt werden. Ein Einspannen in die Fahrbahn oder ein Verankern im Boden ist nicht erforderlich. Die Montage derartiger Betonschutzwände ist daher erheblich kostengünstiger.The particular prefabricated concrete protection walls can thus be placed on the uprising element in a simple manner. Clamping in the road or anchoring in the ground is not required. The installation of such concrete protection walls is therefore considerably cheaper.
Das erfindungsgemäße Rückhaltesystem für Kraftfahrzeuge, das an Fahrbahnbegrenzungen vorgesehen ist, weist in besonders bevorzugter Ausführungsform eine abgestufte Betonschutzwand auf, deren erste Stufe eine Höhe von 150 - 250 mm und vorzugsweise eine Abweichung von der Senkrechten von 8 - 10° aufweist. Eine mittlere Stufe weist eine Höhe 40 - 60 mm, vorzugsweise von ca. 50 mm und vorzugsweise eine Abweichung von der Senkrechten von ca. 50° auf. Eine obere Stufe weist eine Höhe von 600 - 700 mm und vorzugsweise eine Abweichung von der Senkrechten von 8 - 10° auf. Ferner sind in der Betonschutzwand, vorzugsweise in der oberen Stufe mindestens drei vorzugsweise fünf Bewehrungsstäbe oder Bewährungsseile vorgesehen.The restraint system for motor vehicles according to the invention, which is provided on road boundaries, has in a particularly preferred embodiment a stepped concrete protection wall, the first stage has a height of 150 - 250 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of 8 - 10 °. A middle step has a height of 40-60 mm, preferably of about 50 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of about 50 °. An upper step has a height of 600-700 mm and preferably a deviation from the vertical of 8-10 °. Furthermore, at least three preferably five reinforcing bars or probing ropes are provided in the concrete protective wall, preferably in the upper stage.
Besonders bevorzugt ist es, dass das Rückhaltesystem ferner eine Zwischenschicht bzw. ein Zwischenstreifen aufweist, die bzw. der zwischen dem Aufstandfundament und der Fahrbahn bzw. dem Seitenstreifen der Fahrbahn angeordnet ist. Es kann sich hierbei um einen unverdichteten Zwischenstreifen handeln, der insbesondere nicht versiegelt ist. Insofern kann Regenwasser in diesem Bereich versickern. Die Erfindung hat somit ferner den Vorteil, dass keine aufwändigen und teuren Entwässerungsmaßnahmen erforderlich sind. Insbesondere ist es erfindungsgemäß möglich, die ungebundene Tragschicht als Frostschutzschicht auszugestalten, so dass eine einwandfreie Entwässerung möglich ist. Eine Tragschicht ohne Bindemittel wirkt nicht als Wasserbarriere, so dass, unabhängig davon ob ein Zwischenstreifen vorgesehen ist oder nicht, das Abfliessen des Wassers gewährleistet ist.It is particularly preferred that the restraint system further comprises an intermediate layer or an intermediate strip which is arranged between the footing foundation and the roadway or the side strip of the roadway. This may be an uncompressed intermediate strip, which in particular is not sealed. In this respect, rainwater can seep into this area. The invention thus has the further advantage that no costly and expensive drainage measures are required. In particular, it is possible according to the invention to design the unbound base layer as antifreeze layer, so that proper drainage is possible. A base layer without binder does not act as a water barrier, so that, regardless of whether an intermediate strip is provided or not, the drainage of the water is ensured.
Bei der erfindungsgemäßen Tragschicht handelt es sich vorzugsweise um eine verdichtete Kies- und/ oder Schotterschicht. Anstelle oder in Kombination derartiger Schichten kann eine Recycling-Schicht. Bei einer Recycling-Schicht handelt es sich vorzugsweise um eine Schicht, die den technischen Lieferbedingungen für Gestein im Straßenbau entspricht. Entsprechende Definitionen sind insbesondere in "
Bei einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Betonschutzwand verringert sich die Breite der einzelnen Stufen von unten nach oben kontinuierlich, so dass insbesondere glatte Außenflächen entstehen. Besonders bevorzugt ist es, dass die Betonschutzwand auf beiden Seiten die selbe Kontur aufweist und somit insbesondere symmetrisch zu einer Mittelebene ist.In a preferred embodiment of the concrete protective wall according to the invention, the width of the individual steps is continuously reduced from bottom to top, so that in particular smooth outer surfaces are formed. It is particularly preferred that the concrete protective wall has the same contour on both sides and thus is in particular symmetrical to a median plane.
Die vorzugsweise drei, insbesondere fünf Bewehrungsstäbe haben vorzugsweise zueinander einen Abstand von ca. 100 mm. Besonders bevorzugt ist es, alle Bewehrungsstäbe in einer vertikalen Ebene, d. h. übereinander anzuordnen. Vorzugsweise sind die Bewehrungsstäbe entlang einer vertikalen Mittellinie, bzw. in einer vertikalen Mittelebene angeordnet. Hierbei weist der obere Bewehrungsstab vorzugsweise einen Abstand zur Oberseite der Betonschutzwand von ca. 150 mm auf. Die Bewehrungsstäbe oder Bewehrungsseile sind in bevorzugter Ausführungsform oberhalb der oberen Stufe angeordnet und verlaufen in Längsrichtung der Betonschutzwand.The preferably three, in particular five rebars preferably have a distance of about 100 mm to each other. It is particularly preferable to arrange all reinforcing bars in a vertical plane, ie one above the other. Preferably, the reinforcing bars are arranged along a vertical center line, or in a vertical center plane. In this case, the upper reinforcing rod preferably has a distance to the top of the concrete protective wall of about 150 mm. The reinforcing bars or reinforcing cables are in a preferred embodiment above the arranged upper level and extend in the longitudinal direction of the concrete protective wall.
Bei einer besonders bevorzugten Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Betonschutzwand, die eine selbständige Erfindung darstellt, weist die untere Stufe nur eine Höhe von ca. 150 mm auf. Ggf. kann die Stufe auch weniger als 150 mm, insbesondere weniger als 120 mm, aufweisen. Diese Erfindung ist unabhängig davon, ob es sich um eine eingespannte oder nicht eingespannte Betonschutzwand handelt. Besonders bevorzugt ist es diese Erfindung mit vorstehend beschriebener Erfindung zu kombinieren.In a particularly preferred embodiment of the concrete protective wall according to the invention, which represents an independent invention, the lower stage only has a height of about 150 mm. Possibly. The step may also have less than 150 mm, in particular less than 120 mm. This invention is independent of whether it is a clamped or unclamped concrete protective wall. It is particularly preferred to combine this invention with the invention described above.
Dieser Erfindung liegt das Problem zu Grunde, dass Betonschutzwände, insbesondere Betonschutzwände mit hohen Aufhaltestufen ein sehr abruptes, wenig gedämpftes Abbremsen des Fahrzeugs bewirken. Andererseits sollen die Betonschutzwände je nach Aufhaltestufe bis zu klar definierten Kräften nicht verschiebbar sein, um sie beispielsweise zwischen Autobahnfahrbahnen, gefährlichen Böschungen etc. vorsehen zu können. Es besteht somit die Aufgabe, die Dämpfung des Kraftfahrzeugs zu verbessern, um insbesondere Verletzungen der Insassen zu vermeiden oder die Schwere der Verletzungen zu verringern. Erfindungsgemäß kann dies durch eine niedrigere untere Stufe der abgestuften Betonschutzwand erzielt werden. Hierbei weist die untere Stufe der Betonschutzwand eine Höhe auf, die niedriger ist als die Höhe einer Pkw-Achse. Dies hat zur Folge, dass eine Verformung der Pkw-Räder erfolgen kann und der Aufprall nicht unmittelbar und in voller Wucht über die Achse in das Kraftfahrzeug geleitet wird. Die Verformung der Räder bewirkt eine Dämpfung, so dass der Aufprall entsprechend abgemildert ist. Dies ist insbesondere bei nicht eingespannten und insbesondere bei auf ungebundenen Tragschichten aufgestellten Betonschutzwänden vorteilhaft, da ein Teil der Aufprallenergie in Verformungsenergie umgewandelt wird.This invention is based on the problem that concrete protection walls, in particular concrete protection walls with high containment levels cause a very abrupt, little damped deceleration of the vehicle. On the other hand, the concrete protection walls should not be displaceable depending on the retention level up to clearly defined forces, in order to be able to provide them, for example, between motorway lanes, dangerous embankments, etc. It is therefore the object to improve the damping of the motor vehicle, in particular to prevent injury to the occupants or to reduce the severity of injuries. According to the invention this can be achieved by a lower lower step of the stepped concrete protective wall. Here, the lower level of the concrete protection wall has a height which is lower than the height of a car axle. This has the consequence that a deformation of the car wheels can take place and the impact is not passed directly and in full force over the axis in the motor vehicle. The deformation of the wheels causes a damping, so that the impact is mitigated accordingly. This is particularly advantageous in non-clamped and especially erected on unbound support layers concrete protective walls, as part of the impact energy is converted into deformation energy.
Die vorstehend genannten Abmessungen können um ± 20 mm, vorzugsweise lediglich ± 10 mm variieren. Die Neigung kann vorzugsweise um ± 1 gon variieren.The above dimensions may vary by ± 20 mm, preferably only ± 10 mm. The inclination may preferably vary by ± 1 gon.
Der Durchmesser der Bewehrungsstäbe bzw. der Bewehrungsseile beträgt vorzugsweise 10 - 16 mm. Vorzugsweise wird ein Stabstahl Bst 500 S eingesetzt.The diameter of the reinforcing bars or the reinforcing ropes is preferably 10 - 16 mm. Preferably, a steel bar Bst 500 S is used.
Nachfolgend wird die Erfindung an Hand bevorzugter Ausführungsformen unter Bezugnahme auf die anliegenden Zeichnungen näher erläutert.The invention will be explained in more detail with reference to preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Es zeigen:
- Figur 1:
- einen Querschnitt einer ersten bevorzugten Ausführungsform des erfindungsgemäßen Rückhaltesystems und
- Figur 2:
- einen Querschnitt einer zweiten bevorzugten Ausführungsform des erfindungsgemäßen Rückhaltesystems.
- FIG. 1:
- a cross section of a first preferred embodiment of the restraint system according to the invention and
- FIG. 2:
- a cross section of a second preferred embodiment of the restraint system according to the invention.
Eine Betonschutzwand weist eine untere Stufe 10, eine mittlere Stufe 12 und eine obere Stufe 14 auf. In der oberen Stufe 14 sind drei Bewehrungsstäbe 16 vorgesehen, die horizontal ausgerichtet sind. Die Bewehrungsstäbe 16 sind zueinander parallel in einer vertikalen Mittelebene 18 angeordnet. Eine Oberseite 20 der Betonschutzwand weist eine Breite von 180 mm auf. Auf Grund der gewählten Winkel und der übrigen Abmessungen der Betonschutzwand ergibt sich eine Breite einer Auflageseite 22 von 542 mm.A concrete protective wall has a
Bevorzugte Abmessungen können Fig. 1 entnommen werden.Preferred dimensions can be taken from Fig. 1.
Bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Rückhaltesystem für Kraftfahrzeuge ist im dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiel die vorstehend beschriebene Betonschutzwand auf ein Aufstandelement 24, das beispielsweise aus Beton, Kies und/ oder Schotter besteht, aufgestellt. Eine feste Verbindung zwischen der Betonschutzwand und dem Aufstandelement 24, bei dem es sich um eine fahrbahnunabhängige ungebundene Tragschicht handelt, ist nicht erforderlich. Dies hat insbesondere den Vorteil, dass zwischen einer Fahrbahn 26 und dem Aufstandelement 24 eine Zwischenschicht 28 aus unverfestigtem Material oder nur geringfügig verfestigtem Material vorgesehen sein kann. In der Zwischenschicht 28 kann insbesondere Regenwasser versickern. Da die Betonschutzwand nicht eingespannt ist, muss nur eine erheblich schmalere Fahrbahndecke vorgesehen werden, wodurch die Kosten erheblich reduziert werden können.In the restraint system for motor vehicles according to the invention in the illustrated embodiment, the above-described concrete protective wall on an
Bei einer zweiten bevorzugten Ausführungsform (Fig. 2) des erfindungsgemäßen Rückhaltesystems für Kraftfahrzeuge sind die selben und ähnlichen Bestandteile mit den selben Bezugszeichen gekennzeichnet.In a second preferred embodiment (Figure 2) of the automotive restraint system according to the invention, the same and similar components are identified by the same reference numerals.
Bei der in Fig. 2 dargestellten bevorzugten Ausführungsform der Erfindung handelt es sich um ein Rückhaltesystem, das die Anforderungen der Aufhaltsstufe nach H2 nach der Euronorm 1317 - 2 erfüllt. Entsprechende Versuche wurden bereits durchgeführt.In the illustrated in Fig. 2 preferred embodiment of the invention is a restraint system that meets the requirements of the H2 Stability according to the Euronorm 1317-2. Corresponding experiments have already been carried out.
Der wesentliche Unterschied dieser Ausführungsform zu der anhand Fig. 1 beschriebenen Ausführungsform besteht darin, dass in der oberen Stufe 14 nicht drei sondern fünf Bewehrungsstäbe 16 in Längsrichtung der Betonschutzwand vorgesehen sind. Die Bewehrungsstäbe weisen einen Durchmesser von 16 mm auf und bestehen aus dem Stahl BSt 500S.The essential difference of this embodiment with respect to the embodiment described with reference to FIG. 1 is that in the
Die Tragschicht 24 ist frostsicher gegründet und besteht aus Kies und/oder Schotter und/oder geeignetem Recyclingmaterial. Die Tragschicht wurde mit mindestens 97% Proctor verdichtet.The
Claims (11)
einer abgestuften Betonschutzwand, mit mindestens zwei Stufen (10, 12, 14), wobei eine obere Stufe (14) eine geringere mittlere Breite als eine untere Stufe (10) aufweist,
in der Betonschutzwand angeordneten Bewehrungselementen (16) und
einem Aufstandelement (24) zum Aufstellen der Betonschutzwand
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
das Aufstandelement fahrbahnunabhängig ist und als ungebundene Tragschicht (24) ausgebildet ist.Restraint system for motor vehicles, with
a stepped concrete protection wall having at least two steps (10, 12, 14), an upper step (14) having a smaller average width than a lower step (10),
in the concrete protection wall arranged reinforcing elements (16) and
an uprising element (24) for erecting the concrete protective wall
characterized in that
the uprising element is roadway independent and is designed as an unbound support layer (24).
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL06114995T PL1739235T3 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2006-06-06 | Restraint system |
SI200630300T SI1739235T1 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2006-06-06 | Restraint system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102005030412A DE102005030412A1 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2005-06-30 | Restraint system |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1739235A2 true EP1739235A2 (en) | 2007-01-03 |
EP1739235A3 EP1739235A3 (en) | 2007-02-28 |
EP1739235B1 EP1739235B1 (en) | 2009-03-04 |
Family
ID=37102161
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06114995A Active EP1739235B1 (en) | 2005-06-30 | 2006-06-06 | Restraint system |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1739235B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE424483T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102005030412A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1739235T3 (en) |
PL (1) | PL1739235T3 (en) |
SI (1) | SI1739235T1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016110293A2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2016-07-14 | Technische Universität Dresden | Monolithic concrete profile and production method by means of slip forming |
CN107142877A (en) * | 2017-07-07 | 2017-09-08 | 北京华路安交通科技有限公司 | Vertical opening arrangement of reinforcement cage concrete guardrail and construction method |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202009001131U1 (en) | 2009-01-29 | 2009-04-02 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Transitional construction between concrete baffles |
DE202009016995U1 (en) | 2009-12-16 | 2010-04-08 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Connecting element and connection system for connecting concrete sliding walls |
DE202009017487U1 (en) | 2009-12-22 | 2010-03-11 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Bridging element and road boundary element |
EP2339071B1 (en) | 2009-12-22 | 2015-04-15 | Strabag Ag | Bridging element and roadway barrier element |
DE202010002141U1 (en) | 2010-02-09 | 2010-05-06 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Bridging element and road boundary element |
DE202010013884U1 (en) | 2010-10-02 | 2010-12-02 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Road boundary element |
DE202011005689U1 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2011-09-12 | Eurovia Beton Gmbh | Vehicle restraint system |
DE202012006219U1 (en) | 2012-06-27 | 2012-07-24 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Road boundary element |
DE202012006632U1 (en) | 2012-07-07 | 2012-08-06 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | Road boundary element |
EP2905382A1 (en) | 2014-02-11 | 2015-08-12 | TSS Technische Sicherheits-Systeme GmbH | Concrete safety barrier and method for producing a concrete safety barrier |
DE202014001281U1 (en) | 2014-02-11 | 2015-05-20 | Tss Technische Sicherheits-Systeme Gmbh | concrete barrier |
DE202014011344U1 (en) | 2014-03-07 | 2019-07-29 | Strabag Ag | concrete barrier |
DE202014005167U1 (en) | 2014-06-27 | 2015-10-01 | Strabag Ag | concrete barrier |
DE102014212507A1 (en) | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-31 | Ed. Züblin Ag | Repaired Concrete Conductor Section |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1996021774A1 (en) * | 1995-01-13 | 1996-07-18 | Bertels Augustinus Wilhelmus M | Wall structure |
EP1102898A1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2001-05-30 | Autostrade Concessioni E Costruzioni Autostrade S.P.A. | Traffic divider for calibrating the deceleration of vehicles upon impact |
DE10145647C1 (en) * | 2001-09-15 | 2003-01-16 | Tss Tech Sicherheits Systeme G | Safety bollard, for concrete road, has stepped profile with base section embedded directly in concrete road surface |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH641860A5 (en) * | 1981-05-27 | 1984-03-15 | Igeco Sa | Concrete parapet for a road or bridge |
DE20303254U1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-07-08 | Wirtgen Gmbh | Concrete crash barrier |
-
2005
- 2005-06-30 DE DE102005030412A patent/DE102005030412A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2006
- 2006-06-06 DK DK06114995T patent/DK1739235T3/en active
- 2006-06-06 AT AT06114995T patent/ATE424483T1/en active
- 2006-06-06 SI SI200630300T patent/SI1739235T1/en unknown
- 2006-06-06 PL PL06114995T patent/PL1739235T3/en unknown
- 2006-06-06 EP EP06114995A patent/EP1739235B1/en active Active
- 2006-06-06 DE DE502006002989T patent/DE502006002989D1/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO1996021774A1 (en) * | 1995-01-13 | 1996-07-18 | Bertels Augustinus Wilhelmus M | Wall structure |
EP1102898A1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2001-05-30 | Autostrade Concessioni E Costruzioni Autostrade S.P.A. | Traffic divider for calibrating the deceleration of vehicles upon impact |
DE10145647C1 (en) * | 2001-09-15 | 2003-01-16 | Tss Tech Sicherheits Systeme G | Safety bollard, for concrete road, has stepped profile with base section embedded directly in concrete road surface |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016110293A2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2016-07-14 | Technische Universität Dresden | Monolithic concrete profile and production method by means of slip forming |
DE102015100277A1 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2016-07-14 | Technische Universität Dresden | Concrete wall and manufacturing process by slipforming |
CN107142877A (en) * | 2017-07-07 | 2017-09-08 | 北京华路安交通科技有限公司 | Vertical opening arrangement of reinforcement cage concrete guardrail and construction method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
SI1739235T1 (en) | 2009-08-31 |
EP1739235B1 (en) | 2009-03-04 |
DE102005030412A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
EP1739235A3 (en) | 2007-02-28 |
PL1739235T3 (en) | 2009-08-31 |
ATE424483T1 (en) | 2009-03-15 |
DE502006002989D1 (en) | 2009-04-16 |
DK1739235T3 (en) | 2009-06-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1739235B1 (en) | Restraint system | |
DE69528666T2 (en) | GUIDANCE POST WITH TARGET BREAKING POINT AND CABLE RELEASE | |
EP1719840A2 (en) | Guardrail arrangement | |
EP2278072A2 (en) | Protection device | |
DE202009015885U1 (en) | Solar carport | |
DE69307403T2 (en) | Guardrail device made of steel | |
DE202016105226U1 (en) | carport | |
EP2218826A2 (en) | Guide rail | |
DE102007024993B4 (en) | Vehicle restraint system on traffic routes | |
EP2158363B1 (en) | Filled or fillable vehicle restraint system for limiting roadways | |
EP1645691B1 (en) | Transition structure | |
EP1452666B1 (en) | Concrete protection wall | |
DE202005010248U1 (en) | Concrete crash barrier system for motor transport has a graduated concrete guard wall with lower, middle and upper steps and at least two reinforcement bars in the upper step, and is supported without anchoring to the road | |
DE202008003111U1 (en) | Vehicle restraint system with increased support surface for limiting roadways | |
DE202010000658U1 (en) | Guard rail arrangement | |
DE3331670A1 (en) | Guide wall with additional sound insulation for motor vehicle roads | |
DE2413095C3 (en) | Control system for cars and trucks | |
DE202005010249U1 (en) | Retaining system for motor vehicles comprises a stepped concrete protective wall with a lower step, a middle step, and an upper step, and a roadway-independent compressed base for positioning the concrete protective wall | |
EP2567030B1 (en) | Traffic barrier | |
DE202005020527U1 (en) | Roadside crash barrier has a steel-reinforced truncated concrete cone on a wider base | |
DE102016117648A1 (en) | carport | |
DE102010036334B4 (en) | Roadway for vehicles and process for their production | |
AT268359B (en) | Track pad | |
WO2022161839A1 (en) | Barrier wall element | |
EP2952630B1 (en) | Vehicle retention system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070818 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080306 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502006002989 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090416 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20090602 Year of fee payment: 4 Ref country code: SI Payment date: 20090526 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20090527 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090818 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090615 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090618 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090704 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20090602 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E006388 Country of ref document: HU |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090630 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090604 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20090619 Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20091207 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20100625 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20100602 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090605 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20100625 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20100624 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20100628 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20100622 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20100606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SI Ref legal event code: KO00 Effective date: 20110124 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SK Ref legal event code: MM4A Ref document number: E 5831 Country of ref document: SK Effective date: 20100606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100607 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100630 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100606 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100607 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090304 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: TSS TECHNISCHE SICHERHEITS-SYSTEME G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20110630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: LAPE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110607 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110606 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20140618 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20140618 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20140623 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20150630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 424483 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20150701 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150701 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230620 Year of fee payment: 18 |