[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1727679B1 - Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires - Google Patents

Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1727679B1
EP1727679B1 EP05717040A EP05717040A EP1727679B1 EP 1727679 B1 EP1727679 B1 EP 1727679B1 EP 05717040 A EP05717040 A EP 05717040A EP 05717040 A EP05717040 A EP 05717040A EP 1727679 B1 EP1727679 B1 EP 1727679B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
image
printing substrate
quality
panel
taken
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP05717040A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1727679A2 (fr
Inventor
Jens LOCHMÜLLER
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koenig and Bauer AG
Original Assignee
Koenig and Bauer AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=34961308&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1727679(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from DE200410014549 external-priority patent/DE102004014549B3/de
Priority claimed from DE200410029140 external-priority patent/DE102004029140A1/de
Application filed by Koenig and Bauer AG filed Critical Koenig and Bauer AG
Publication of EP1727679A2 publication Critical patent/EP1727679A2/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1727679B1 publication Critical patent/EP1727679B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control

Definitions

  • the invention relates to methods for identifying a single benefit with a print image of faulty quality on a substrate with multiple benefits according to the preamble of claim 1 or 11.
  • the DE 200 10 920 U1 and the EP 11 67 036 A1 are a printing machine, in particular a sheetfed offset press, known in which for detecting the quality of a printing material arranged on an image capture device detects the substrate and an evaluation device connected to the image acquisition device compares the recorded by the image capture device image of the substrate with a reference image, wherein the substrate with a A plurality of identical printed images is printed and the evaluation evaluates only a subset of the printed images from the image of the printing material, wherein the evaluation outputs a signal to a counter for registration of the subset in accordance with the evaluated subset with the reference image.
  • a method of identifying a single benefit with a print image of defective quality on a multi-use substrate wherein an inspection system with a camera captures an image of the substrate and processes data of the captured image in an image processing system, the image processing system capturing the data of the image processing system recorded image with a single benefit on the substrate compares data record.
  • an image inspection system for a printing press in which the printing material printed in the user recorded by an image pickup device and the image signals obtained are processed in a downstream image processing, wherein the image pickup device is arranged according to the image signals controllable printing device, through which at designated locations of the printing material markings can be generated for the identification of identified as defective areas, as a result of which incorrectly printed benefits are ausschleusbar in a suitably trained device further processing.
  • the invention has for its object to provide methods for identifying a single benefit with a print image of faulty quality on a substrate with multiple benefits, where the identification of the print image of defective quality benefits without the aid of a printed Referenzbedruckstoffes takes place and in which for the identification of individual erroneous benefits and for obtaining a record for performing this identification a rational production process results.
  • a printing material printed by a printing press in particular a sheet
  • the benefit with the print image of faulty quality is separable in a subsequent process of the printing process, so that all other benefits can be fed with a print image of good quality of the intended use.
  • a single benefit with a printed image of defective quality is uniquely identifiable. It is very advantageous that each of the proposed methods is capable of identifying individual benefits of any shape and orientation on the substrate.
  • a set-up phase of the printing press remains unaffected by the process for identifying a single benefit with a print image of faulty quality, so that in the setup phase of the printing press, an additional step is not required, the z. B. could consist in an evaluation of a specially prepared Einrichtebogens.
  • a suitable in particular for a print image inspection inspection system has according to its schematic representation in the Fig. 1 a camera 01, z. B. one or more coupled color line cameras 01 or a color area camera 01, which receives an illuminated by a lighting device 02 image of a preferably formed as a sheet 03 substrate 03 after the z. B. made of paper substrate 03 from a printing press, z.
  • a rotary printing machine in particular a sheet offset rotary printing machine, has been printed with at least one printed image.
  • the printing material 03 is printed in its passage through the printing press in multi-color printing, so involved in the production of the printed product several superimposed to be printed, differing in hue of the respective printing ink color separations.
  • the image taken by the camera 01 forms at least part of the printing material 03.
  • the output of the result is z. B. on a connected to the data processing image processing system 04 monitor 06.
  • inputs, z. B. the image processing system 04 for its calculations necessarily be notified parameters are entered via a connected to the image processing system 04 keyboard 07.
  • the substrate 03 here z. B. the sheet 03 is printed in its passage through the printing press in the whotik and has according to the Fig. 2 several individual benefits 09 in a composite.
  • the individual benefits 09 may be repetitive, z. B. also identical print motifs, preferably structured, z. B. grid-like, ie arranged in rows and columns, on the sheet 03, wherein arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 in the preferred embodiment does not have to cover the entire printable area of the sheet 03.
  • the benefits 09 arranged on the sheet 03 are identical in their contours, or for the respective contours to be substantially rectangular, or for those arranged on the sheet 03 Benefits 09 are adjacent to each other seamlessly or that the benefits 09 are arranged on the sheet 03 in a regular structure, ie a grid with a fixed orientation.
  • the sheet 03 resulting on the sheet 03 at least one area 11, z.
  • the printed sheet 03 further processing process step is removed. Therefore, the image photographically taken by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 from the sheet 03 in the image processing system 04 is preferably evaluated only with respect to the utility 09 arranged on the sheet 03, so that the area 11 or edge 11 located on the sheet 03 outside the utility 09 one of the quality of the printed image mitigating error is not evaluated.
  • the selective evaluation of the sheet 03 with respect to at least one of the quality of the printed image mitigating error eg. As a color error, contamination or any other before or especially during the printing process the bow 03 added error is designed such that it is determined which arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 of the color line camera 01 or the color surface camera 01 detected error is to be assigned.
  • information about the location of the detected error with respect to the surface predetermined by the sheet 03, in particular its printable surface is preferably initially determined in the image processing system 04 by a corresponding evaluation of the data correlated with the recorded image, so that the quality of the printed image is reduced Error z. B. is localized in its coordinates, and then of the printed on the sheet 03 benefits 09 of the benefits 09 is identified within the contour of the location of the detected error is located.
  • a single benefit 09 is identified by the fact that the image processing system 04, so to speak, hangs up a template in its data processing process steps on the image taken by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 from the sheet 03, the template consisting of an electronically generated data record, this data record is not taken from a photographically recorded image and in particular is not obtained within the printing press, but z. B. stored in a pre-press data is taken.
  • the template forming the record is z. B. generated with a CAD system (computer-aided design) and a memory z. B. fed in the prepress, this record information about position, shape or shape or size, z. B. diameter, the individual arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 contains or wherein this information is at least removed from this record.
  • the information can also refer to the arrangement of individual benefits 09 in the totality of all benefits 09 and thus provide information about the location of a single benefit 09 relative to one or more other benefits 09.
  • the shape of a benefit 09 characterizes its type or type, e.g. As circle, rectangle or any other geometric shape.
  • the data set is generated in conjunction with a production of a die for separating the benefits 09 from the sheet 03 and fed to the image processing system 04. This measure is advantageous because it makes use of an already existing data record, so that additional expenditure for generating this data record does not arise.
  • the template forming the record is a fixed reference between a detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 error to a single use 09 on the sheet 03 produced by the information z. B.
  • the arrangement, shape or size of the individual arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 is superimposed on the data from the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 image or at least the information on the location of the detected error for the purpose of comparison. Because with the help of the template forming the record can now z. B. by the image processing system 04 by comparing the information to the determined location of the error with the information on the arrangement, shape or size of the individual arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 are clearly identified, which arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 a on the Sheet 03 is associated with detected and localized error.
  • a benefit 09 identified in such a way with regard to a fault detected by the color line camera 01 or the color area camera 01 can be detected by a user.
  • the identified on the sheet 03 benefits 09 within the contour of which is detected by the color line camera 01 or the color surface camera 01 error is separable from the other benefits 09 in a process subsequent to the actual printing process processing by arranged on the sheet 03 benefits 09 z , B. are punched out with a punch and the detected error having, preferably marked benefits 09 z. B. is extracted by discharge.
  • all the benefits arranged on the sheet 03 are 09 except for the marked ones Benefit 09 of the intended use fed, which is particularly advantageous for high-quality printed products.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
  • Accessory Devices And Overall Control Thereof (AREA)
  • Image Analysis (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)

Claims (17)

  1. Procédé d'identification d'un exemplaire (09) individuel à image imprimée de qualité défectueuse, sur une matière imprimée (03) comportant plusieurs exemplaires (09), où une image est enregistrée de façon photographique, au moins par une partie de la matière imprimée (03), et est vérifiée avec des données en corrélation avec l'image enregistrée, afin de savoir s'il y a sur la matière imprimée (03) un défaut qui diminue la qualité de l'image imprimée, où, en référence à la matière imprimée (03), une information, concernant l'emplacement de l'exemplaire (09) présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée, est déterminée, caractérisé en ce que l'emplacement de l'exemplaire (09) présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée est déterminé par une comparaison des données en corrélation avec l'image enregistrée, avec un jeu de données, généré de façon électronique, avec une information concernant l'agencement, la forme ou la taille des différents exemplaires (09) disposés sur la matière imprimée (03).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le jeu de données, généré de façon électronique, avec l'information concernant l'agencement, la forme ou la taille des différents exemplaires disposés sur la matière imprimée (03), est prélevée dans des données, mémorisées à l'occasion d'une étape préliminaire à l'impression.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le jeu de données, généré de façon électronique, avec l'information concernant l'agencement, la forme ou la taille des différents exemplaires disposés sur la matière imprimée (03), est établi lors d'une étape de procédé traitant la matière imprimée (03).
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le jeu de données, généré de façon électronique, prélevé des données mémorisées, avec l'information concernant l'agencement, la forme ou la taille des différents exemplaires disposés sur la matière imprimée (03), est obtenu en liaison avec une fabrication d'une forme de découpage, pour séparer les exemplaires (09) de la matière imprimée (03).
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le jeu de données, généré de façon électronique, prélevé des données mémorisées, avec l'information concernant l'agencement, la forme ou la taille des différents exemplaires disposés sur la matière imprimée (03), est produit avec un système de conception assistée par ordinateur (CAD).
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'exemplaire (09) déterminé, présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée, est marqué.
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'une numérotation, ou une autre caractérisation, est appliquée sur l'exemplaire (09) déterminé, présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée.
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'exemplaire (09) déterminé, présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée, est affiché sur un moniteur (06).
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'exemplaire (09) déterminé, présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée, est séparé des autres exemplaires (9), en une étape de traitement subséquente au processus d'impression.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'exemplaire (09) déterminé, présentant le défaut diminuant la qualité de l'image imprimée, est séparé de la matière imprimée (03) par estampage.
  11. Procédé d'identification d'un exemplaire (09) individuel à image imprimée de qualité défectueuse, sur une matière imprimée (03) comportant plusieurs exemplaires (09), où une étape d'inspection enregistre, avec une caméra (01), une image de la matière imprimée (03), et traite des données de l'image enregistrée, dans un système de traitement d'images (04), le système de traitement d'images (04) comparant les données de l'image enregistrée à un jeu de données, concernant des exemplaires (09) individuels sur la matière imprimée (03), caractérisé en ce que le système de traitement d'images (04) effectue la comparaison à un jeu de données, prélevé des données mémorisées, concernant la forme des exemplaires (09) individuels sur la matière imprimée (03), le jeu de données provenant d'une fabrication d'une forme de découpage, pour séparer les exemplaires (09) de la matière imprimée (03).
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que, dans le système de traitement d'images (04), l'image, enregistrée à partir de la matière imprimée (03), est superposée à une image obtenue du jeu de données.
  13. Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que le système de traitement d'images (04) effectue la comparaison des données de l'image enregistrée à un jeu de données concernant la position des exemplaires (09) individuels sur la matière imprimée (03).
  14. Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce qu'un exemplaire (09), ne coïncidant pas avec la forme prédéterminée par le jeu de données, est marqué par un dispositif de marquage (08).
  15. Procédé selon la revendication 14, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de marquage (08) est commandé par le système de traitement d'images (04).
  16. Procédé selon la revendication 14, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de marquage applique une numérotation ou une autre caractérisation sur l'exemplaire (09) ayant une image imprimée de qualité défectueuse.
  17. Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce qu'un exemplaire (09), ne coïncidant pas avec la forme prédéterminée par le jeu de données, est affiché sur un moniteur (06).
EP05717040A 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires Active EP1727679B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE200410014549 DE102004014549B3 (de) 2004-03-23 2004-03-23 Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE200410029140 DE102004029140A1 (de) 2004-06-17 2004-06-17 Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
PCT/EP2005/051163 WO2005092620A2 (fr) 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1727679A2 EP1727679A2 (fr) 2006-12-06
EP1727679B1 true EP1727679B1 (fr) 2008-10-01

Family

ID=34961308

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05717040A Active EP1727679B1 (fr) 2004-03-23 2005-03-15 Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7710595B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1727679B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE409584T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE502005005538D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2310814T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005092620A2 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019110854A1 (de) * 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens und Vorrichtungen zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens
WO2020216521A1 (fr) 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Machine de traitement de feuille et procédé pour inspecter une feuille
DE102021114252A1 (de) 2021-06-02 2022-12-08 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Ausschleusung und/oder Entnahme fehlerhafter Nutzen

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102006015828A1 (de) * 2006-04-03 2007-10-04 Man Roland Druckmaschinen Ag Gewichtete Bogeninspektion
US20130087059A1 (en) * 2011-10-06 2013-04-11 Applied Vision Corporation System and method for detecting decorator wheel blanket defects
DE102015203358B4 (de) 2015-02-25 2016-09-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0540833B1 (fr) * 1991-08-12 1997-04-23 KOENIG & BAUER-ALBERT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT ContrÔle de qualité d'une image, par exemple un modèle imprimé
DE4432371B4 (de) * 1994-09-12 2004-12-09 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Verfahren zum Drucken und Weiterverarbeiten von Nutzen
DE19613083A1 (de) * 1996-04-02 1997-10-09 Koenig & Bauer Albert Ag Verfahren zur qualitativen Beurteilung von bearbeitetem Material
EP2008819B1 (fr) * 2000-05-08 2010-08-25 Kba-Giori S.A. Installation de traitement de feuilles de papier imprimé
DE20010920U1 (de) 2000-06-20 2000-09-14 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 63075 Offenbach Druckmaschine, insbesondere Bogenoffsetdruckmaschine
DE20213431U1 (de) 2002-08-31 2002-11-07 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 63075 Offenbach Einrichtung zur Qualitätskontrolle an Drucksachen
DE10244437B4 (de) 2002-09-24 2009-09-17 Maschinenfabrik Wifag Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Position und Form von Marken auf einer bedruckten Papierbahn
DE20303574U1 (de) 2003-03-06 2003-04-30 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 63075 Offenbach Bildinspektionssystem für eine Druckmaschine
US7017492B2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2006-03-28 Quad/Tech, Inc. Coordinating the functioning of a color control system and a defect detection system for a printing press

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019110854A1 (de) * 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens und Vorrichtungen zur Inspektion zumindest eines Bogens
WO2020216521A1 (fr) 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Machine de traitement de feuille et procédé pour inspecter une feuille
DE102019110853A1 (de) * 2019-04-26 2020-10-29 Koenig & Bauer Ag Bogenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines verbliebenen und von einer Formgebungseinrichtung bearbeiteten Teils zumindest eines Bogens
DE102019110853B4 (de) 2019-04-26 2022-05-12 Koenig & Bauer Ag Bogenbearbeitungsmaschine und Verfahren zur Inspektion zumindest eines verbliebenen und von einer Formgebungseinrichtung bearbeiteten Teils zumindest eines Bogens
US11597200B2 (en) 2019-04-26 2023-03-07 Koenig & Bauer Ag Sheet processing machine, method for inspecting at least one remaining portion of at least one sheet processed by a shaping device, and method for inspecting a sheet
DE102021114252A1 (de) 2021-06-02 2022-12-08 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zur Ausschleusung und/oder Entnahme fehlerhafter Nutzen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2310814T3 (es) 2009-01-16
US7710595B2 (en) 2010-05-04
DE502005005538D1 (de) 2008-11-13
WO2005092620A2 (fr) 2005-10-06
US20070181026A1 (en) 2007-08-09
EP1727679A2 (fr) 2006-12-06
ATE409584T1 (de) 2008-10-15
WO2005092620A3 (fr) 2006-03-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2011651B1 (fr) Système d'inspection d'un image imprimé
DE102015207566B3 (de) Verfahren zur Detektion ausgefallener Druckdüsen in Inkjet-Drucksystemen
EP1728380B1 (fr) Procede d'identification precoce d'un ecart dans des images imprimees produites en continu par une presse d'impression
EP2902203B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
EP2960058B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la commande générique et au réglage d'un processus d'impression numérique
DE102004031129B4 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung von Farbbalken auf doppelseitigen Farbdrucken und System zur Qualitätskontrolle eines Farbdrucks
EP1300243B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour déterminer la position d'une bande imprimée
EP1727679B1 (fr) Procede d'identification d'un exemplaire individuel a image imprimee de qualite defectueuse sur une matiere imprimee comportant plusieurs exemplaires
DE102008000031B4 (de) Verfahren zur Kontrolle einer Anordnung von an Formzylindern einer Druckmaschine angeordneten Druckformen
DE102009007864B4 (de) Druckbildabhängige Positionierung von Farbmess-Streifen
EP0763427B1 (fr) Procédé pour contrôler la fabrication d'images sur un support d'une plaque d'impression pour une machine d'impression
DE102010049945A1 (de) Ermittlungsverfahren und -vorrichtung für Geometriefehler eines Bedruckstoffes
EP3871892B1 (fr) Détection pour minimiser les déchets
AT501210B1 (de) Verfahren zur qualitätskontrolle an oberflächenvariablen drucksachen
DE102008056170B4 (de) Farbmessgerät mit automatischer Seitenerkennung
EP3426492B1 (fr) Procédé de vérification du maintien du registre d'images d'impression à imprimer sur deux faces opposées d'un substrat d'impression
DE102019208257A1 (de) Druckqualitätsanalyse mit neuronalen Netzen
EP3628489B1 (fr) Mesure de registre sans marque
DE102018220524A1 (de) Verfahren zur Detektion ausgefallener Druckdüsen in einer Inkjet-Druckmaschine
DE102006012513A1 (de) Bildverarbeitungssystem für eine Druckmaschine
EP1673226B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour controler des resultats d'impression
DE102004029140A1 (de) Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
DE102004014549B3 (de) Verfahren zur Identifikation eines einzelnen Nutzens mit einem Druckbild von fehlerhafter Qualität auf einem Bedruckstoff mit mehreren Nutzen
EP3104299B1 (fr) Production de marques a un stade preliminaire d'un processus d'impression
DE102015203358B4 (de) Verfahren zur Beurteilung von mehreren jeweils mindestens ein Druckbild aufweisenden Druckerzeugnissen hinsichtlich ihrer jeweiligen Weiterverarbeitungsfähigkeit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060331

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071106

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20081113

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2310814

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090201

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090302

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

Effective date: 20090701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090101

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090331

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081001

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20111219

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120322

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20120425

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120403

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20120402

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20111219

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120330

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120321

Year of fee payment: 8

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER A.G.

Effective date: 20130331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20131001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 409584

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130315

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130315

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130315

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20140613

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130316

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502005005538

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240301

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240321

Year of fee payment: 20