[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1712610A1 - Compositions de lavage - Google Patents

Compositions de lavage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1712610A1
EP1712610A1 EP06110285A EP06110285A EP1712610A1 EP 1712610 A1 EP1712610 A1 EP 1712610A1 EP 06110285 A EP06110285 A EP 06110285A EP 06110285 A EP06110285 A EP 06110285A EP 1712610 A1 EP1712610 A1 EP 1712610A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
surfactant
detergent composition
preferred
detersive surfactant
lipase
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP06110285A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1712610B1 (fr
Inventor
Neil Joseph Lant
Steven George Patterson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Procter and Gamble Co
Original Assignee
Procter and Gamble Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=36968363&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1712610(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Priority claimed from EP05250998A external-priority patent/EP1693440A1/fr
Application filed by Procter and Gamble Co filed Critical Procter and Gamble Co
Priority to PL06110285T priority Critical patent/PL1712610T3/pl
Priority to EP06110285.1A priority patent/EP1712610B1/fr
Publication of EP1712610A1 publication Critical patent/EP1712610A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1712610B1 publication Critical patent/EP1712610B1/fr
Revoked legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/12Water-insoluble compounds
    • C11D3/124Silicon containing, e.g. silica, silex, quartz or glass beads
    • C11D3/1246Silicates, e.g. diatomaceous earth
    • C11D3/128Aluminium silicates, e.g. zeolites
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/06Phosphates, including polyphosphates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/38Products with no well-defined composition, e.g. natural products
    • C11D3/386Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase
    • C11D3/38627Preparations containing enzymes, e.g. protease or amylase containing lipase

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to laundry detergent compositions and in particular to detergents comprising lipolytic or lipase enzymes.
  • lipase enzymes such as Lipolase (trade name, Novozymes) worked particularly effectively at the lower moisture levels of the drying phase of the wash process. These enzymes tended to produce significant cleaning only in the second wash step because the active site of the enzyme was occupied by water during the washing process, so that fat breakdown was significant only on soils remaining on laundered clothes during the drying stage, the broken down fats then being removed in the next washing step.
  • lipases have been developed that also work effectively during the wash phase of the cleaning process, so that as well as cleaning in the second washing step, a significant improvement in cleaning effect due to lipase enzyme can be found in the first wash-cycle.
  • Such enzymes are as described in WO00/60063 and Research Disclsoure IP6553D. Such enzymes are referred to below as first wash lipases.
  • first wash lipases examples include certain variants of lipolase (wild-type Humicola lanuginosa) which should comprise one or more substitutions with positive amino acids near the N-terminal in the three-dimensional structure. The variants should further comprise a peptide addition at the C-terminal and/or should meet certain limitations on electrically charged amino acids at positions 90-101 and 210.
  • the problem facing the present inventors was how to maximise performance from this new generation of enzymes.
  • the present inventors found that whilst a small benefit could be achieved formulating such enzymes according to present day detergent formulations by simply replacing existing lipase enzymes with the new generation of enzymes, a considerable improvement in performance was found by formulating the detergent compositions in a different way and even reducing the levels of some conventional detergent ingredients.
  • a detergent composition comprising a lipase which is a polypeptide having an amino acid sequence which: (a) has at least 90% identity with the wild-type lipase derived from Humicola lanuginosa strain DSM 4109; (b) compared to said wild-type lipase, comprises a substitution of an electrically neutral or negatively charged amino acid at the surface of the three-dimensional structure within 15 ⁇ of E1 or Q249 with a positively charged amino acid; and (c) comprises a peptide addition at the C-terminal; and/or (d) comprises a peptide addition at the N-terminal and/or (e) meets the following limitations: i) comprises a negative amino acid in position E210 of said wild-type lipase; ii) comprises a negatively charged amino acid in the region corresponding to positions 90-101 of said wild-type lipase; and iii) comprises a neutral or negative amino acid at a position corresponding to N94 of said wild-
  • a detergent composition comprising a lipase enzyme producing First Wash lard removal performance better than that produced by WT Lipolase (tradename from Novozymes) using the Lard First Wash Test described below, and the detergent composition comprising less than 10 wt% aluminosilicate builder and less than 10 wt% phosphate builder, the composition having a reserve alkalinity greater than 4.
  • WT Lipolase from Novozymes is described in US 5 869 438, seq#2.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention comprise less than 10 wt% builders selected from aluminosilicate (zeolite) builder and/or phosphate builder. In a further preferred aspect of the invention, the compositions comprise less than 8wt% zeolite, or even less than 4wt% and less than 8 wt% phosphate builder or even less than 4wt%.
  • the present inventors have found that when a first wash lipase is used in conjunction with a low level of phosphate and zeolite builder, dramatically improved grease removal benefits are obtained compared to formulating lipase with conventional builder levels. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that this is driven by the presence of divalent cations enhancing lipase activity by (i) increasing the deposition of enzyme onto the fabric surface and/or (ii) enhancing the precipitation of insoluble fatty acid salts arising from the lipolysis enzymatic process.
  • compositions show unexpectedly good performance. Without wishing to be bound by theory it is believed that this is due to fatty acids released by the lipase during lipolysis of fatty soils acting to (i) destabilize these stains via a hardness sequestration effect and (ii) reduce the wash pH slightly resulting in lightening of pH-sensitive stains.
  • the reference lipase used in this invention is the wild type lipase derived from Humicola lanuginosa strain DSM 4109. It is described in EP258068 and EP305216 and has the amino acid sequence shown in positions 1-269 of SEQ ID NO: 2 of US5869438 (attached hereto). In this specification, the reference lipase is also referred to as Lipolase.
  • the lipase of the invention comprises one or more (e.g. 2-4, particularly two) substitutions of an electrically neutral or negatively charged amino acid near E1 or Q249 with a positively charged amino acid, preferably R.
  • substitution is at the surface of the three-dimensional structure within 15 A of E1 or Q249, e.g. at any of positions 1-11, 90, 95, 169, 171-175, 192-211, 213-226, 228-258, 260-262.
  • substitution may be within 10 ⁇ of E1 or Q249, e.g. at any of positions 1-7, 10, 175, 195, 197-202, 204-206, 209, 215, 219-224, 230-239, 242-254.
  • substitution may be within 15 ⁇ of E1, e.g. at any of positions 1-11, 169, 171, 192-199, 217-225, 228-240, 243-247, 249, 261-262.
  • substitution is most preferably within 10 ⁇ of E1, e.g. at any of positions 1-7, 10, 219-224 and 230-239.
  • substitutions are S3R, S224R, P229R, T231R, N23 3R, D234R and T244R.
  • the lipase may comprise a peptide addition attached to C-terminal L269.
  • the peptide addition improves the first-wash performance in a variety of detergents.
  • the peptide addition preferably consists of 1-5 amino acids, e.g. 2, 3 or 4 amino acids.
  • the amino acids of the peptide addition will be numbered 270, 271, etc.
  • the peptide addition may consist of electrically neutral (e.g. hydrophobic) amino acids, e.g. PGL or PG.
  • the lipase peptide addition consists of neutral (e.g. hydrophobic) amino acids and the amino acid C, and the lipase comprises substitution of an amino acid with C at a suitable location so as to form a disulfide bridge with the C of the peptide addition. Examples are:
  • the lipase used in the invention preferably meets certain limitations on electrically charged amino acids at positions 90-101 and 210.
  • amino acid 210 may be negative.
  • E210 may be unchanged or it may have the substitution E210D/C/Y, particularly E210D.
  • the lipase may comprise a negatively charged amino acid at any of positions 90-101 (particularly 94-101), e.g. at position D96 and/or E99.
  • the lipase may comprise a neutral or negative amino acid at position N94, i.e. N94 (neutral or negative), e.g. N94N/D/E.
  • the lipase may have a negative or neutral net electric charge in the region 90-101 (particularly 94-101), i.e. the number of negative amino acids is equal to or greater than the number of positive amino acids.
  • the region may be unchanged from Lipolase, having two negative amino acids (D96 and E99) and one positive (K98), and having a neutral amino acid at position 94 (N94), or the region may be modified by one or more substitutions.
  • N94, N96 and E99 may have a negative or unchanged electric charge.
  • all three amino acids may be unchanged or may be changed by a conservative or negative substitution, i.e. N94 (neutral or negative), D(negative) and E99(negative).
  • N94D/E and D96E are examples of the three amino acids.
  • one of the three may be substituted so as to increase the electric charge, i.e. N94 (positive), D96 (neutral or positive) or E99 (neutral or positive).
  • Examples are N94K/R, D96I/L/N/S/W or E99N/Q/K/R/H.
  • the substitution of a neutral with a negative amino acid may improve the performance in an anionic detergent.
  • the substitution of a neutral amino acid with a positive amino acid may provide a variant lipase with good performance both in an anionic detergent and in an anionic/non-ionic detergent (a detergent with e.g. 40-70 % anionic out of total surfactant).
  • a substitution Q249R/K/H and/or a substitution of R209 with a neutral or negative amino acid e.g. R209P/S
  • the lipase may optionally comprise the substitution G91A.
  • the lipase may optionally comprise substitutions of one or more additional amino acids.
  • substitutions may, e.g. be made according to principles known in the art, e.g. substitutions described in WO92/05249, WO94/25577, WO95/22615, WO97/04079 and WO97/07202.
  • Specific examples of suitable combinations of substitutions are given in the table bridging pages 4 and 5 of WO00/60063. Nomenclature for amino acid modifications is as described in WO00/60063.
  • the preferred lipase enzymes are described in WO00/60063, the most preferred being Lipex (registered tradename of Novozymes), a variant of the Humicola lanuginosa (Thermomyces lanuginosus) lipase (Lipolase registered tradename of Novozymes) with the mutations T231R and N23 3R.
  • the lipase enzyme incorporated into the detergent compositions of the present invention is generally present in an amount of 10 to 20000 LU/g of the detergent composition, or even 100 to 10000 LU/g.
  • the LU unit for lipase activity is defined in WO99/42566.
  • the lipase dosage in the wash solution is typically from 0.01 to 5 mg/1 active lipase protein, more typically from 0.1 to 2mg/l as enzyme protein. As a percentage by weight of the enzyme protein in the detergent composition, this is generally from 0.00001 to 2wt%, more usually 0.0001 to 1 % or even 0.001 to 0.5wt%.
  • the lipase enzyme may be incorporated into the detergent composition in any convenient form, generally in the form of a non-dusting granulate, a stabilised liquid or a protected, for example, coated enzyme particle.
  • Detergent Composition A A:
  • the percentage of lard removed is determined as:
  • the reflectance (which may also be termed remission) is measured on an Elrepho 2000 apparatus from Datacolor which illuminates the sample with 2 xenon blitz lamps and measures the amount of reflected light so that entirely white corresponds to a 100% reflectance and entirely black a 0% reflectance. Comparing the results for lard removal due to the presence of enzyme, lipase enzymes giving better performance than WT LipolaseTM are suitable for use in the compositions of the present invention.
  • laundry detergents comprise strong inorganic builder, with either phosphate builder typically sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP), or zeolite typically sodium aluminosilicate builder, being used as the predominant strong builder.
  • phosphate builder typically sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP)
  • zeolite typically sodium aluminosilicate builder
  • the amount of strong builder selected from phosphate and/or zeolite builder is no greater than 10 wt% based on the total weight of the detergent composition, preferably below 8 wt%, or even below 5 or 4 or 3 or 2 or 1 wt% .
  • compositions of the invention may comprise from 0 wt% to 10wt% zeolite builder, and 0 wt% to 10 wt% phosphate builder, the total amount of phosphate and/or zeolite not exceeding 10 wt%, and preferably being below 10 wt% as described above.
  • the compositions of the invention comprise from 0 wt% to 8 wt%, or from 0 wt% to 5 or 4 wt%, or from 0 wt% to 3 or even less than 2 wt% zeolite builder. It may even be preferred for the composition to be essentially free from zeolite builder.
  • the composition comprises no deliberately added zeolite builder. This is especially preferred if it is desirable for the composition to be very highly soluble, to minimise the amount of water-insoluble residues (for example, which may deposit on fabric surfaces), and also when it is highly desirable to have transparent wash liquor.
  • Zeolite builders include zeolite A, zeolite X, zeolite P and zeolite MAP.
  • compositions of the invention may comprise from 0 wt% to 10 wt% phosphate builder.
  • the composition preferably comprises from 0 wt% to 8 wt%, or from 0 wt% to 5 or 4 wt%, or from 0 wt% to 3 or even 2 wt% phosphate builder. It may even be preferred for the composition to be essentially free from phosphate builder. By essentially free from phosphate builder it is typically meant that the composition comprises no deliberately added phosphate builder. This is especially preferred if it is desirable for the composition to have a very good environmental profile.
  • Phosphate builders include sodium tripolyphosphate.
  • the total level of weak builders selected from layered silicate (SKS-6), citric acid, citrate salts and nitrilo triacetic acid or salt thereof is below 15 wt%, more preferably below 8 wt%, more preferably below 4 wt% or even below 3 or 2 wt% based on the total weight of the detergent composition.
  • the level of each of layered silicate, citric acid, citrate salts and nitrilo triacetic acid or salt thereof will be below 10 wt% or even below 5 wt% or wt% based on the total weight of the composition.
  • builders bring several benefits to the formulator, their main role is to sequester divalent metal ions (such as calcium and magnesium ions) from the wash solution that would otherwise interact negatively with the surfactant system. Builders are also effective at removing metal ions and inorganic soils from the fabric surface too, leading to improved removal of particulate and beverage stains. It would therefore be expected that reduction of their levels would negatively impact on cleaning performance and therefore, preparation of detergent compositions that are effective with the claimed reduced levels of phosphate and zeolite builders is surprising.
  • divalent metal ions such as calcium and magnesium ions
  • Adequate reserve alkalinity may be provided, for example, by one or more of alkali metal silicates (excluding crystalline layered silicate), typically amorphous silicate salts, generally 1.2 to 2.2 ratio sodium salts, alkali metal typically sodium carbonate, bicarbonate and/or sesquicarbonates.
  • alkali metal silicates excluding crystalline layered silicate
  • typically amorphous silicate salts generally 1.2 to 2.2 ratio sodium salts
  • alkali metal typically sodium carbonate, bicarbonate and/or sesquicarbonates.
  • STPP and persalts such as perborates and percarbonates also contribute to alkalinity. Buffering is necessary to maintain an alkaline pH during the wash process counteracting the acidity of soils, especially fatty acids liberated by the lipase enzyme.
  • the detergent composition preferably comprises from 0 wt% to 50 wt% silicate salt, more usually 5 to 30 wt% silicate salt, or 7 to 20 wt% silicate salt, usually sodium silicate.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may comprise a carbonate salt, typically from 1 wt% to 70 wt%, or from 5 wt% to 50 wt% or from 10 wt% to 30 wt% carbonate salt.
  • Preferred carbonate salts are sodium carbonate and/or sodium bicarbonate and/or sodium sesquicarbonate.
  • the carbonate salt may be incorporated into the detergent composition wholly or partially via a mixed salt such as Burkeite.
  • a highly preferred carbonate salt is sodium carbonate.
  • the composition may comprise from 5 wt% to 50 wt% sodium carbonate, or from 10 to 40 wt% or even 15 to 35 wt% sodium carbonate. It may also be desired for the composition to comprise from 1wt% to 20 wt% sodium bicarbonate, or even 2 to 10 or 8 wt%.
  • the weight ratio of sodium carbonate and/or sodium silicate to zeolite builder may be at least 5:1, preferably at least 10:1, or at least 15:1, or at least 20:1 or even at least 25:1
  • the carbonate salt, or at least part thereof is typically in particulate form, typically having a weight average particle size in the range of from 200 to 500 micrometers. However, it may be preferred for the carbonate salt, or at least part thereof, to be in micronised particulate form, typically having a weight average particle size in the range of from 4 to 40 micrometers; this is especially preferred when the carbonate salt, or at least part thereof, is in the form of a co-particulate admixture with a detersive surfactant, such as an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • a detersive surfactant such as an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the levels of carbonate and/or silicate salts typically sodium carbonate and sodium silicate will be from 10 to 70 wt%, or from 10 or even 15 to 50 wt% based on the total weight of the composition.
  • a highly preferred adjunct component of the compositions of the invention is a surfactant.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more surfactants.
  • the detergent composition comprises (by weight of the composition) from 0% to 50%, preferably from 5% and more preferably from 10 or even 15 wt% to 40%, or to 30%, or to 20% one or more surfactants.
  • Preferred surfactants are anionic surfactants, non-ionic surfactants, cationic surfactants, zwitterionic surfactants, amphoteric surfactants, cationic surfactants and mixtures thereof.
  • Suitable anionic surfactants typically comprise one or more moieties selected from the group consisting of carbonate, phosphate, phosphonate, sulphate, sulphonate, carboxylate and mixtures thereof.
  • the anionic surfactant may be one or mixtures of more than one of C 8-18 alkyl sulphates and C 8-18 alkyl sulphonates.
  • Suitable anionic surfactants incorporated alone or in mixtures in the compositions of the invention are also the C 8-18 alkyl sulphates and/or C 8-18 alkyl sulphonates optionally condensed with from 1 to 9 moles of C 1-4 alkylene oxide per mole of C 8-18 alkyl sulphate and/or C 8-18 alkyl sulphonate.
  • the alkyl chain of the C 8-18 alkyl sulphates and/or C 8-18 alkyl sulphonates may be linear or branched, preferred branched alkyl chains comprise one or more branched moieties that are C 1-6 alkyl groups.
  • suitable anionic surfactants include the C 10 -C 20 primary, branched-chain, linear-chain and random-chain alkyl sulphates (AS), typically having the following formula: CH 3 (CH 2 ).CH 2 -OS0 3 - M + wherein, M is hydrogen or a cation which provides charge neutrality, preferred cations are sodium and ammonium cations, wherein x is an integer of at least 7, preferably at least 9; C 10 -C 18 secondary (2,3) alkyl sulphates, typically having the following formulae: wherein, M is hydrogen or a cation which provides charge neutrality, preferred cations include sodium and ammonium cations, wherein x is an integer of at least 7, preferably at least 9, y is an integer of at least 8, preferably at least 9; C 10 -C 18 alkyl alkoxy carboxylates; mid-chain branched alkyl sulphates as described in more detail in US 6,020,303 and US 6,060,443; modified
  • Preferred anionic surfactants are C 8-18 alkyl benzene sulphates and/or C 8-18 alkyl benzene sulphonates.
  • the alkyl chain of the C 8-18 alkyl benzene sulphates and/or C 8-18 alkyl benzene sulphonates may be linear or branched, preferred branched alkyl chains comprise one or more branched moieties that are C 1-6 alkyl groups.
  • Suitable anionic surfactants are selected from the group consisting of: C 8-18 alkenyl sulphates, C 8-18 alkenyl sulphonates, C 8-18 alkenyl benzene sulphates, C 8-18 alkenyl benzene sulphonates, C 8-18 alkyl di-methyl benzene sulphate, C 8-18 alkyl di-methyl benzene sulphonate, fatty acid ester sulphonates, di-alkyl sulphosuccinates, and combinations thereof.
  • esters of alpha-sulfonated fatty acids typically containing from 6 to 20 carbon atoms in the fatty acid group and from 1 to 10 carbon atoms in the ester group; 2-acyloxy-alkane-1-sulfonic acid and salts thereof, typically containing from about 2 to 9 carbon atoms in the acyl group and from about 9 to 23 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety; alpha-olefin sulfonates (AOS), typically containing from about 12 to 24 carbon atoms; and beta-alkoxy alkane sulfonates, typically containing from about 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from about 8 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety.
  • AOS alpha-olefin sulfonates
  • beta-alkoxy alkane sulfonates typically containing from about 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and from about 8 to 20 carbon atoms in the alkane moiety.
  • fatty acid esters containing an alkyl group typically with from 10 to 20 carbon atoms.
  • C 1-4 most preferably methyl ester sulphonates.
  • Preferred are C 16-18 methyl ester sulphonates (MES).
  • the anionic surfactants may be present in the salt form.
  • the anionic surfactant(s) may be an alkali metal salt of any of the above.
  • Preferred alkali metals are sodium, potassium and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred anionic detersive surfactants are selected from the group consisting of: linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted, C 12-18 alkyl sulphates; linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted, C 10-13 alkylbenzene sulphonates, preferably linear C 10-13 alkylbenzene sulphonates; and mixtures thereof. Highly preferred are linear C 10-13 alkylbenzene sulphonates.
  • linear C 10-13 alkylbenzene sulphonates that are obtainable, preferably obtained, by sulphonating commercially available linear alkyl benzenes (LAB);
  • suitable LAB include low 2-phenyl LAB, such as those supplied by Sasol under the tradename Isochem® or those supplied by Petresa under the tradename Petrelab® , other suitable LAB include high 2-phenyl LAB, such as those supplied by Sasol under the tradename Hyblene® .
  • the anionic detersive surfactant may be structurally modified in such a manner as to cause the anionic detersive surfactant to be more calcium tolerant and less likely to precipitate out of the wash liquor in the presence of free calcium ions.
  • This structural modification could be the introduction of a methyl or ethyl moiety in the vicinity of the head group of the anionic detersive surfactant, as this can lead to a more calcium tolerant anionic detersive surfactant due to steric hindrance of the head group, which may reduce the affinity of the anionic detersive surfactant for complexing with free calcium cations in such a manner as to cause precipitation out of solution.
  • the composition may comprise an alkoxylated anionic surfactant. Where present such a surfactant will generally be present in amounts from 0.1 wt% to 40 wt%, generally 0.1 to 10 wt%based on the detergent composition as a whole. It may be preferred for the composition to comprise from 3wt% to 5wt% alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, or it may be preferred for the composition to comprise from lwt% to 3wt% alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted C 12-18 alkyl alkoxylated sulphate having an average degree of alkoxylation of from 1 to 30, preferably from 1 to 10.
  • the alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted C 12-18 alkyl ethoxylated sulphate having an average degree of ethoxylation of from 1 to 10.
  • the alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant is a linear unsubstituted C 12-18 alkyl ethoxylated sulphate having an average degree of ethoxylation of from 3 to 7.
  • the alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant may also increase the non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant activity by making the non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant less likely to precipitate out of solution in the presence of free calcium cations.
  • the weight ratio of non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant is less than 5:1, or less than 3:1, or less than 1.7:1, or even less than 1.5:1. This ratio gives optimal whiteness maintenance performance combined with a good hardness tolerency profile and a good sudsing profile.
  • the weight ratio of non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant is greater than 5:1, or greater than 6:1, or greater than 7:1, or even greater than 10:1. This ratio gives optimal greasy soil cleaning performance combined with a good hardness tolerency profile, and a good sudsing profile.
  • Suitable alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactants are: Texapan LESTTM by Cognis; Cosmacol AESTM by Sasol; BES151TM by Stephan; Empicol ESC70/UTM; and mixtures thereof.
  • compositions of the invention may comprise non-ionic surfactant. Where present it is generally present in amounts of from 0.5wt% to 20, more typically 0.5 to 10 wt% based on the total weight of the composition.
  • the composition may comprise from 1wt% to 7wt% or from 2wt% to 4wt% non-ionic detersive surfactant.
  • non-ionic detersive surfactant helps to provide a good overall cleaning profile, especially when laundering at high temperatures such as 60°C or higher.
  • the non-ionic detersive surfactant could be an alkyl polyglucoside and/or an alkyl alkoxylated alcohol.
  • the non-ionic detersive surfactant is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted C 8-18 alkyl ethoxylated alcohol having an average degree of ethoxylation of from 1 to 50, more preferably from 3 to 40.
  • Non-ionic surfactants having a degree of ethoxylation from 3 to 9 may be especially useful either.
  • Nonionic surfactants having an HLB value of from 13 to 25, such as C 8-18 alkyl ethoxylated alcohols having an average degree of ethoxylation from 15 to 50, or even from 20 to 50 may also be preferred non-ionic surfactants in the compositions of the invention.
  • these latter non-ionic surfactants are Lutensol AO30 and similar materials disclosed in WO04/041982. These may be beneficial as they have good lime soap dispersant properties.
  • the non-ionic detersive surfactant not only provides additional soil cleaning performance but may also increase the anionic detersive surfactant activity by making the anionic detersive surfactant less likely to precipitate out of solution in the presence of free calcium cations.
  • the weight ratio of non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to non-ionic detersive surfactant is in the range of less than 8:1, or less than 7:1, or less than 6:1 or less than 5:1, preferably from 1:1 to 5:1, or from 2:1 to 5:1, or even from 3:1 to 4:1.
  • the detergent compositions are free of cationic surfactant.
  • the composition optionally may comprise from 0.1wt% to 10 or 5wt% cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the composition comprises from 0.5wt% to 3wt%, or from 1% to 3wt%, or even from 1wt% to 2wt% cationic detersive surfactant. This is the optimal level of cationic detersive surfactant to provide good cleaning.
  • Suitable cationic detersive surfactants are alkyl pyridinium compounds, alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds, alkyl quaternary phosphonium compounds, and alkyl ternary sulphonium compounds.
  • the cationic detersive surfactant can be selected from the group consisting of: alkoxylate quaternary ammonium (AQA) surfactants as described in more detail in US 6,136,769; dimethyl hydroxyethyl quaternary ammonium as described in more detail in US 6,004,922; polyamine cationic surfactants as described in more detail in WO 98/35002, WO 98/35003, WO 98/35004, WO 98/35005, and WO 98/35006; cationic ester surfactants as described in more detail in US 4,228,042, US 4,239,660, US 4,260,529 and US 6,022,844; amino surfactants as described in more detail in US 6,221,825 and WO 00/47708, specifically amido propyldimethyl amine; and mixtures thereof.
  • AQA alkoxylate quaternary ammonium
  • Preferred cationic detersive surfactants are quaternary ammonium compounds having the general formula: (R)(R 1 )(R 2 )(R 3 )N + X - wherein, R is a linear or branched, substituted or unsubstituted C 6-18 alkyl or alkenyl moiety, R 1 and R 2 are independently selected from methyl or ethyl moieties, R 3 is a hydroxyl, hydroxymethyl or a hydroxyethyl moiety, X is an anion which provides charge neutrality, preferred anions include halides (such as chloride), sulphate and sulphonate.
  • Preferred cationic detersive surfactants are mono-C 6-18 alkyl mono-hydroxyethyl di-methyl quaternary ammonium chlorides. Highly preferred cationic detersive surfactants are mono-C 8-10 alkyl mono-hydroxyethyl di-methyl quaternary ammonium chloride, mono-C 10-12 alkyl mono-hydroxyethyl di-methyl quaternary ammonium chloride and mono-C 10 alkyl mono-hydroxyethyl di-methyl quaternary ammonium chloride. Cationic surfactants such as Praepagen HY (tradename Clariant) may be useful and may also be useful as a suds booster.
  • Praepagen HY tradename Clariant
  • the cationic detersive surfactant provides additional greasy soil cleaning performance.
  • the cationic detersive surfactant may increase the tendency of any non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to precipitate out of solution.
  • the cationic detersive surfactant and any non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant are separated in the detergent composition of the invention, for example if cationic surfactant is present, preferably the cationic and any anionic surfactant, particularly non-alkoxylated anionic surfactant will be present in the composition in separate particles.
  • the weight ratio of non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to cationic detersive surfactant is in the range of from 5:1 to 25:1, more preferably from 5:1 to 20:1 or from 6:1 to 15:1, or from 7:1 to 10:1, or even from 8:1 to 9:1.
  • the detergent composition comprises from 1 to 50 wt% anionic surfactant, more typically from 2 to 40 wt%.
  • Alkyl benzene sulphonates are preferred anionic surfactants.
  • compositions of the present invention comprise at least two different surfactants in combination comprising at least one selected from a first group, the first group comprising alkyl benzene sulphonate and MES surfactant; and at least one selected from a second group, the second group comprising alkoxylated anionic surfactant, MES and alkoxylated non-ionic surfactant and alpha olefin sulfonates (AOS).
  • a particularly preferred combination comprises alkyl benzene sulphonate, preferably LAS in combination with MES.
  • a further particularly preferred combination comprises alkyl benzene sulphonate, preferably LAS with an alkoxylated anionic surfactant, preferably C 8-18 alkyl alkoxylated sulphate having an average degree of alkoxylation of from 1 to 10.
  • a third particularly preferred combination comprises alkyl benzene sulphonate, preferably LAS in combination with an alkoxylated non-ionic surfactant, preferably C 8-18 alkyl ethoxylated alcohol having a degree of alkoxylation of from 15 to 50, preferably from 20 to 40.
  • the weight ratio of the surfactant from the first group to the weight ratio of the surfactant from the second group is typically 1:5 to 100:1, preferably 1:2 to 100:1 or 1:1 to 50:1 or even to 20:1 1 or 10:1.
  • the levels of the surfactants are as described above under the specific classes of surfactants. Presence of AE3S and/or MES in the system is preferred on account of their exceptional hardness-tolerance and ability to disperse lime soaps which are formed during the wash by lipase.
  • the surfactant in the detergent compositions of the invention comprises at least three surfactants, at least one from each of the first and second groups defmed above and in addition a third surfactant, preferably also from the first or second groups defined above.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may surprisingly contain relatively low levels of surfactant and yet still perform good cleaning, on account of the soil removal functionality delivered by the lipase, so that the overall level of surfactant may be below 12 wt%, or 10 wt% or 8 wt% based on total weight of the composition
  • compositions of the invention may comprise at least 0.1wt%, or at least 0.5 wt%, or at least 2 or 3 wt%, or even at least 5 wt% polymeric polycarboxylates up to levels of 30 wt% or 20 wt% or 10 wt%.
  • Preferred polymeric polycarboxylates include: polyacrylates, preferably having a weight average molecular weight of from 1,000Da to 20,000Da; co-polymers of maleic acid and acrylic acid, preferably having a molar ratio of maleic acid monomers to acrylic acid monomers of from 1:1 to 1:10 and a weight average molecular weight of from 10,000Da to 200,000Da, or preferably having a molar ratio of maleic acid monomers to acrylic acid monomers of from 0.3:1 to 3:1 and a weight average molecular weight of from 1,000Da to 50,000Da.
  • Suitable polycarboxylates are the Sokalan CP, PA and HP ranges (BASF) such as Sokalan CP5, PA40 and HP22, and the Alcosperse range of polymers (Alco) such as Alcosperse 725, 747, 408, 412 and 420.
  • Sokalan CP Sokalan CP5
  • PA40 and HP22 PA40 and HP22
  • Alcosperse range of polymers Alcosperse 725, 747, 408, 412 and 420.
  • the composition comprises at least 1wt%, or at least 2wt%, or at least 3wt% soil dispersants.
  • the detergent composition also comprises a suds booster, typically in amounts from 0.01 to 10 wt%, preferably in amounts from 0.02 to 5 wt% based on the total weight of the composition.
  • Suitable suds boosters include fatty acid amides, fatty acid alkalonamides, betaines, sulfobetaines and amine oxides. Particularly preferred materials are cocamidopropyl betaine, cocomonoethanolamide and amine oxide.
  • a suitable amine oxide is Admox 12, supplied by Albemarle.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may additionally comprise anti-redeposition polymers such as the polymeric polycarboxylates described above.
  • anti-redeposition polymers such as the polymeric polycarboxylates described above.
  • cellulose ethers such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) will be useful.
  • a suitable CMC is Tylose CR1500 G2, sold by Clariant.
  • Suitable polymers are also sold by Andercol, Colombia under the Textilan brand name.
  • additives with lime soap dispersancy functionality such as the aforementioned MES, AES, highly ethoxylated nonionic surfactant or polymers showing excellent lime soap dispersancy such as Acusol 460N (Rohm & Haas). Lists of suitable lime soap dispersants are given in the following references and documents cited therein.
  • a soil release polymer has been found to be especially beneficial in further strengthening the stain removal and cleaning benefits of the development, especially on synthetic fibres.
  • Modified cellulose ethers such as methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose (MHEC), for example as sold by Clariant as Tylose MH50 G4 and Tylose MH300 G4, are preferred.
  • Polyester-based Soil Release Polymers are especially preferred as they can also be effective as lime soap dispersants. Examples of suitable materials are Repel-o-Tex PF (supplied by Rhodia), Texcare SRA100 (supplied by Clariant) and Sokalan SR100 (BASF)
  • the formulations may contain one or more other enzymes in addition to the first wash lipase, for example protease, amylase, cellulase (especially endoglucanase), pectate lyase and/or mannanase.
  • enzymes for example protease, amylase, cellulase (especially endoglucanase), pectate lyase and/or mannanase.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may be in any convenient form such as solids such as powdered or granular or tablet solids, bars, or liquids which may be aqueous or on-aqueous, gels or liquigels. Any of these forms may be partially or completely encapsulated.
  • the present invention particularly relates to solid detergent compositions, especially granular compositions.
  • surfactants are incorporated into agglomerates, extrudates or spray dried particles along with solid materials, usually builders, and these may be admixed to produce a fully formulated detergent composition according to the invention.
  • the detergent compositions of the present invention are preferably those having an overall bulk density of from 350 to 1200 g/1, more preferably 450 to 1000g/1 or even 500 to 900g/l.
  • the detergent particles of the detergent composition in a granular form have a size average particle size of from 200 ⁇ m to 2000 ⁇ m, preferably from 350 ⁇ m to 600 ⁇ m.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention will comprise a mixture of detergent particles including combinations of agglomerates, spray-dried powders and/or dry added materials such as bleaching agents, enzymes etc.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention comprise an anionic surfactant from the list above which is a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant and this is preferably incorporated into the detergent composition in particulate form, such as via an agglomerate, a spray-dried powder, an extrudate, a bead, a noodle, a needle or a flake. Spray-dried particles are preferred.
  • the agglomerate preferably comprises at least 20%, by weight of the agglomerate, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, more preferably from 25wt% to 65wt%, by weight of the agglomerate, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant. It may be preferred for part of the non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to be in the form of a spray-dried powder (e.g. a blown powder), and for part of the non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant to be in the form of a non-spray-dried powder (e.g.
  • agglomerate, or an extrudate, or a flake such as a linear alkyl benzene sulphonate flake; suitable linear alkyl benzene sulphonate flakes are supplied by Pilot Chemical under the tradename F90® , or by Stepan under the tradename Nacconol 90G® ). This is especially preferred when it is desirable to incorporate high levels of non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant in the composition.
  • Any alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant may be incorporated into the detergent compositons of the invention via a spray-dried particle of a non-spray-dried powder such as an extrudate, agglomerate, preferably an agglomerate.
  • a spray-dried particle of a non-spray-dried powder such as an extrudate, agglomerate, preferably an agglomerate.
  • Non- spray dried particles are preferred when it is desirable to incorporate high levels of alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant in the composition
  • any non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof can be incorporated into the composition in the form of a liquid spray-on, wherein the non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof, in liquid form (e.g. in the form of a hot-melt) is sprayed onto the remainder of the composition.
  • the non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof may be in included into a particulate for incorporation into the detergent composition of the invention and the non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof, may be dry-added to the remainder of the composition.
  • the non-ionic surfactant, or at least part thereof may be in the form of a co-particulate admixture with a solid carrier material such as carbonate salt, sulphate salt, burkeite, silica or any mixture thereof.
  • Any non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof, may be in a co-particulate admixture with either an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant or a cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the non-ionic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof, may be agglomerated or extruded with either an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant or a cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the cationic detersive surfactant if present may be incorporated into the composition by incorporation in a particulate, such as a spray-dried powder, an agglomerate, an extrudate, a flake, a noodle, a needle, or any combination thereof.
  • a particulate such as a spray-dried powder, an agglomerate, an extrudate, a flake, a noodle, a needle, or any combination thereof.
  • the cationic detersive surfactant, or at least part thereof is in the form of a spray-dried powder or an agglomerate.
  • a detergent composition comprising granular components, and comprising at least two separate surfactant components or even at least three separate surfactant components: a first, a second and an optional third surfactant component.
  • These separate surfactant components may be present in separate particulates so that at least two surfactant components are separate from one another in the detergent composition.
  • the composition preferably comprises at least two separate surfactant components, each in particulate form. It may be preferred for the composition to comprise at least three separate surfactant components, each in particulate form.
  • the first surfactant component predominantly comprises an alkoxylated detersive surfactant.
  • predominantly comprises it is meant that the first surfactant component comprises greater than 50%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably greater than 60%, or greater than 70%, or greater than 80%, or greater than 90% or even essentially 100%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the first surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even 0%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the first surfactant component is essentially free from non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • essentially free from non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the first surfactant component comprises no deliberately added non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant. This is especially preferred in order to ensure that the composition has good dispensing and dissolution profiles, and also to ensure that the composition provides a clear wash liquor upon dissolution in water.
  • the first surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even 0%, by weight of the first surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the first surfactant component is essentially free from cationic detersive surfactant.
  • essentially free from cationic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the first surfactant component comprises no deliberately added cationic detersive surfactant. This is especially preferred in order to reduce the degree of surfactant gelling in the wash liquor.
  • the first surfactant component is preferably in the form of a spray-dried powder, an agglomerate, an extrudate or a flake. If the first surfactant component is in the form of an agglomerate particle or an extrudate particle, then preferably the particle comprises from 20% to 65%, by weight of the particle, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant. If the first surfactant component is in spray-dried particle form, then preferably the particle comprises from 10wt% to 30wt%, by weight of the particle, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the first surfactant component may be in the form of a co-particulate admixture with a solid carrier material.
  • the solid carrier material can be a sulphate salt and/or a carbonate salt, preferably sodium sulphate and/or sodium carbonate.
  • the second surfactant component predominantly comprises a non-alkoxylated detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component comprises greater than 50%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably greater than 60%, or greater than 70%, or greater than 80%, or greater than 90% or even essentially 100%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even 0%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even 0%, by weight of the second surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component is essentially free from alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the second surfactant component comprises no deliberately added alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component is essentially free from cationic detersive surfactant.
  • essentially free from cationic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the second surfactant component comprises no deliberately added cationic detersive surfactant. This is especially preferred in order to ensure that the composition has good dispensing and dissolution profiles, and also to ensure that the composition provides a clear wash liquor upon dissolution in water.
  • the second surfactant component may be in the form of a spray-dried powder, a flash-dried powder, an agglomerate or an extrudate. If the second surfactant component is in the form of an agglomerate particle, then preferably the particle from 5% to 50%, by weight of the particle, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, or from 5wt% to 25wt% non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the second surfactant component may be in form of a co-particulate admixture with a solid carrier material.
  • the solid carrier material can be a sulphate salt and/or a carbonate salt, preferably sodium sulphate and/or sodium carbonate.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may be substantially free of cationic surfactant, if present, the cationic surfactant may be present in a third surfactant component or may be incorporated into a spray-dried particle with at least some anionic surfactant. If present in a third component, it may be beneficial to have the third surfactant component predominantly comprising a cationic detersive surfactant. By predominantly comprises, it is meant the third surfactant component comprises greater than 50%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant, preferably greater than 60%, or greater than 70%, or greater than 80%, or greater than 90% or even essentially 100%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of a cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the third surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even essentially 0%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of an alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the third surfactant component comprises less than 10%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant, preferably less than 5%, or less than 2%, or even 0%, by weight of the third surfactant component, of a non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the third surfactant component is essentially free from alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the third surfactant component comprises no deliberately added alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • the third surfactant component is essentially free from non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant.
  • non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant By essentially free from non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant it is typically meant that the third surfactant component comprises no deliberately added non-alkoxylated anionic detersive surfactant. This is especially preferred in order to ensure that the composition has good dispensing and dissolution profiles, and also to ensure that the composition provides a clear wash liquor upon dissolution in water.
  • the third surfactant component is preferably in the form of a spray-dried powder, a flash-dried powder, an agglomerate or an extrudate. If the third surfactant component is in the form of an agglomerate particle, then preferably the particle comprises from 5% to 50%, by weight of the particle, of cationic detersive surfactant, or from 5wt% to 25wt% cationic detersive surfactant.
  • the third surfactant component may be in form of a co-particulate admixture with a solid carrier material.
  • the solid carrier material can be a sulphate salt and/or a carbonate salt, preferably sodium sulphate and/or sodium carbonate.
  • the detergent ingredients can include one or more other detersive adjuncts or other materials for assisting or enhancing cleaning performance, treatment of the substrate to be cleaned, or to modify the aesthetics of the detergent composition.
  • Usual detersive adjuncts of detergent compositions include the ingredients set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 3,936,537, Baskerville et al. and in Great Britain Patent Application No. 9705617.0, Trinh et al., published September 24, 1997.
  • adjuncts are included in detergent compositions at their conventional art-established levels of use, generally from 0 wt% to about 80 wt% of the detergent ingredients, preferably from about 0.5 wt% to about 20wt % and can include color speckles, suds boosters, suds suppressors, anti-tarnish and/or anticorrosion agents, soil-suspending agents, soil release agents, dyes, fillers, optical brighteners, germicides, alkalinity sources, hydrotropes, antioxidants, enzymes, enzyme stabilizing agents, solvents, solubilizing agents, chelating agents, clay soil removal/anti-redeposition agents, polymeric dispersing agents, processing aids, fabric softening components, static control agents, bleaching agents, bleaching activators, bleach stabilizers, dye-transfer inhibitors, flocculants, fabric softeners, suds supressors, fabric integrity agents, perfumes, whitening agents, photobleach, alkali metal sulphate salts, sulphamic acid, sodium
  • Preferred zwitterionic surfactants comprise one or more quaternized nitrogen atoms and one or more moieties selected from the group consisting of: carbonate, phosphate, sulphate, sulphonate, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred zwitterionic surfactants are alkyl betaines.
  • Other preferred zwitterionic surfactants are alkyl amine oxides.
  • Catanionic surfactants which are complexes comprising a cationic surfactant and an anionic surfactant may also be included. Typically, the molar ratio of the cationic surfactant to anionic surfactant in the complex is greater than 1:1, so that the complex has a net positive charge.
  • a preferred adjunct component is a bleaching agent.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more bleaching agents.
  • the composition comprises (by weight of the composition) from 1% to 50% of one or more bleaching agent.
  • Preferred bleaching agents are selected from the group consisting of sources of peroxide, sources of peracid, bleach boosters, bleach catalysts, photo-bleaches, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred sources of peroxide are selected from the group consisting of: perborate monohydrate, perborate tetra-hydrate, percarbonate, salts thereof, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred sources of peracid are selected from the group consisting of: bleach activator typically with a peroxide source such as perborate or percarbonate, preformed peracids, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred bleach activators are selected from the group consisting of: oxy-benzene-sulphonate bleach activators, lactam bleach activators, imide bleach activators, and combinations thereof.
  • a preferred source of peracid is tetra-acetyl ethylene diamine (TAED)and peroxide source such as percarbonate.
  • Preferred oxy-benzene-sulphonate bleach activators are selected from the group consisting of: nonanoyl-oxy-benzene-sulponate, 6-nonamido-caproyl-oxy-benzene-sulphonate, salts thereof, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred lactam bleach activators are acyl-caprolactams and/or acyl-valerolactams.
  • a preferred imide bleach activator is N-nonanoyl-N-methyl-acetamide.
  • Preferred preformed peracids are selected from the group consisting of N,N-pthaloyl-amino-peroxycaproic acid, nonyl-amido-peroxyadipic acid, salts thereof, and combinations thereof.
  • the STW-composition comprises one or more sources of peroxide and one or more sources of peracid.
  • Preferred bleach catalysts comprise one or more transition metal ions.
  • Other preferred bleaching agents are di-acyl peroxides.
  • Preferred bleach boosters are selected from the group consisting of: zwitterionic imines, anionic imine polyions, quaternary oxaziridinium salts, and combinations thereof.
  • Highly preferred bleach boosters are selected from the group consisting of: aryliminium zwitterions, aryliminium polyions, and combinations thereof. Suitable bleach boosters are described in US360568, US5360569 and US5370826.
  • a preferred adjunct component is an anti-redeposition agent.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more anti-redeposition agents.
  • Preferred anti-redeposition agents are cellulosic polymeric components, most preferably carboxymethyl celluloses.
  • a preferred adjunct component is a chelant.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more chelants.
  • the detergent composition comprises (by weight of the composition) from 0.01 % to 10% chelant, or 0.01 to 5 wt% or 4 wt% or 2 wt%.
  • Preferred chelants are selected from the group consisting of: hydroxyethane-dimethylene-phosphonic acid, ethylene diamine tetra(methylene phosphonic) acid, diethylene triamine pentacetate, ethylene diamine tetraacetate, diethylene triamine penta(methyl phosphonic) acid, ethylene diamine disuccinic acid, and combinations thereof.
  • a preferred adjunct component is a dye transfer inhibitor.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more dye transfer inhibitors.
  • dye transfer inhibitors are polymeric components that trap dye molecules and retain the dye molecules by suspending them in the wash liquor.
  • Preferred dye transfer inhibitors are selected from the group consisting of: polyvinylpyrrolidones, polyvinylpyridine N-oxides, polyvinylpyrrolidone-polyvinylimidazole copolymers, and combinations thereof
  • Preferred adjunct components include other enzymes.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more additional enzymes.
  • Preferred enzymes are selected from then group consisting of: amylases, arabinosidases, carbohydrases, cellulases, chondroitinases, cutinases, dextranases, esterases, ⁇ -glucanases, gluco-amylases, hyaluronidases, keratanases, laccases, ligninases, lipoxygenases, malanases, mannanases, oxidases, pectinases, pentosanases, peroxidases, phenoloxidases, phospholipases, proteases, pullulanases, reductases, tannases, transferases, xylanases, xyloglucanases, and combinations thereof.
  • Preferred additional enzymes are selected from the group consisting of: amylases, carbohydrases, cellul
  • a preferred adjunct component is a fabric integrity agent.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more fabric integrity agents.
  • fabric integrity agents are polymeric components that deposit on the fabric surface and prevent fabric damage during the laundering process.
  • Preferred fabric integrity agents are hydrophobically modified celluloses. These hydrophobically modified celluloses reduce fabric abrasion, enhance fibre-fibre interactions and reduce dye loss from the fabric.
  • a preferred hydrophobically modified cellulose is described in WO99/14245.
  • Other preferred fabric integrity agents are polymeric components and/or oligomeric components that are obtainable, preferably obtained, by a process comprising the step of condensing imidazole and epichlorhydrin.
  • a preferred adjunct component is a salt.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more salts.
  • the salts can act as alkalinity agents, buffers, builders, co-builders, encrustation inhibitors, fillers, pH regulators, stability agents, and combinations thereof.
  • the detergent composition comprises (by weight of the composition) from 5% to 60% salt.
  • Preferred salts are alkali metal salts of aluminate, carbonate, chloride, bicarbonate, nitrate, phosphate, silicate, sulphate, and combinations thereof.
  • Other preferred salts are alkaline earth metal salts of aluminate, carbonate, chloride, bicarbonate, nitrate, phosphate, silicate, sulphate, and combinations thereof.
  • Especially preferred salts are sodium sulphate, sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, sodium silicate, sodium sulphate, and combinations thereof.
  • the alkali metal salts and/or alkaline earth metal salts may be anhydrous.
  • a preferred adjunct component is a soil release agent.
  • the detergent composition comprises one or more soil release agents.
  • soil release agents are polymeric compounds that modify the fabric surface and prevent the redeposition of soil on the fabric.
  • Preferred soil release agents are copolymers, preferably block copolymers, comprising one or more terephthalate unit.
  • Preferred soil release agents are copolymers that are synthesised from dimethylterephthalate, 1,2-propyl glycol and methyl capped polyethyleneglycol.
  • Other preferred soil release agents are anionically end capped polyesters.
  • the detergent compositions of the invention may comprise softening agents for softening through the wash such as clay optionally also with flocculant and enzymes.
  • the invention also includes methods of washing textiles comprising contacting textiles with an aqueous solution comprising the detergent composition of the invention.
  • the invention may be particularly beneficial at low water temperatures such as below 30°C or below 25 or 20°C.
  • the aqueous wash liquor will comprise at least 100 ppm, or at least 500ppm of the detergent composition

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
EP06110285.1A 2005-02-22 2006-02-22 Compositions de lavage Revoked EP1712610B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL06110285T PL1712610T3 (pl) 2005-02-22 2006-02-22 Kompozycje deteregentu
EP06110285.1A EP1712610B1 (fr) 2005-02-22 2006-02-22 Compositions de lavage

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP05250998A EP1693440A1 (fr) 2005-02-22 2005-02-22 Compositions de lavage
EP06110285.1A EP1712610B1 (fr) 2005-02-22 2006-02-22 Compositions de lavage

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1712610A1 true EP1712610A1 (fr) 2006-10-18
EP1712610B1 EP1712610B1 (fr) 2013-11-06

Family

ID=36968363

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06110285.1A Revoked EP1712610B1 (fr) 2005-02-22 2006-02-22 Compositions de lavage

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1712610B1 (fr)
PL (1) PL1712610T3 (fr)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2012527230A (ja) * 2009-05-19 2012-11-08 デュポン ニュートリション バイオサイエンシーズ エーピーエス 使用
WO2013113622A1 (fr) * 2012-02-03 2013-08-08 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et polynucléotides codant pour ceux-ci
US9139798B2 (en) 2008-10-15 2015-09-22 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions
US9879204B2 (en) 2010-03-17 2018-01-30 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions with lower freezing point
US9909087B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2018-03-06 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions with improved enzyme compatibility and/or stability
WO2019154955A1 (fr) 2018-02-08 2019-08-15 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions en comprenant
WO2021001400A1 (fr) 2019-07-02 2021-01-07 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions de ceux-ci
WO2021037878A1 (fr) 2019-08-27 2021-03-04 Novozymes A/S Composition comprenant une lipase

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL3101110T3 (pl) 2006-01-23 2023-11-20 The Procter & Gamble Company Kompozycje zawierające enzym i środek barwiący tkaninę

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0258068A2 (fr) * 1986-08-29 1988-03-02 Novo Nordisk A/S Additif enzymatique pour détergent
EP0305216A1 (fr) * 1987-08-28 1989-03-01 Novo Nordisk A/S Lipase recombinante de humicola et procédé de production de lipases recombinantes de humicola
GB2287948A (en) 1994-03-31 1995-10-04 Procter & Gamble Laundry detergent composition
US5869438A (en) * 1990-09-13 1999-02-09 Novo Nordisk A/S Lipase variants
WO1999042566A1 (fr) * 1998-02-17 1999-08-26 Novo Nordisk A/S Variante de lipase
WO2000060063A1 (fr) * 1999-03-31 2000-10-12 Novozymes A/S Variante genetique de lipase
WO2003097780A1 (fr) 2002-05-20 2003-11-27 Unilever N.V. Compositions de detergent enzymatiques

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0258068A2 (fr) * 1986-08-29 1988-03-02 Novo Nordisk A/S Additif enzymatique pour détergent
EP0305216A1 (fr) * 1987-08-28 1989-03-01 Novo Nordisk A/S Lipase recombinante de humicola et procédé de production de lipases recombinantes de humicola
US5869438A (en) * 1990-09-13 1999-02-09 Novo Nordisk A/S Lipase variants
GB2287948A (en) 1994-03-31 1995-10-04 Procter & Gamble Laundry detergent composition
WO1999042566A1 (fr) * 1998-02-17 1999-08-26 Novo Nordisk A/S Variante de lipase
WO2000060063A1 (fr) * 1999-03-31 2000-10-12 Novozymes A/S Variante genetique de lipase
WO2003097780A1 (fr) 2002-05-20 2003-11-27 Unilever N.V. Compositions de detergent enzymatiques

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9139798B2 (en) 2008-10-15 2015-09-22 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions
JP2012527230A (ja) * 2009-05-19 2012-11-08 デュポン ニュートリション バイオサイエンシーズ エーピーエス 使用
US9879204B2 (en) 2010-03-17 2018-01-30 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions with lower freezing point
US9909087B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2018-03-06 Method Products, Pbc Liquid cleaning compositions with improved enzyme compatibility and/or stability
US9394530B2 (en) 2012-02-03 2016-07-19 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
EP3211074A3 (fr) * 2012-02-03 2017-10-04 Novozymes A/S Variantes de la lipase et polynucléotides les codant
WO2013113622A1 (fr) * 2012-02-03 2013-08-08 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et polynucléotides codant pour ceux-ci
US10119128B2 (en) 2012-02-03 2018-11-06 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
EP3696265A3 (fr) * 2012-02-03 2020-10-07 Novozymes A/S Variantes de la lipase et polynucléotides les codant
US10927356B2 (en) 2012-02-03 2021-02-23 Novozymes A/S Lipase variants and polynucleotides encoding same
WO2019154955A1 (fr) 2018-02-08 2019-08-15 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions en comprenant
WO2019154954A1 (fr) 2018-02-08 2019-08-15 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions en comprenant
WO2019154952A1 (fr) 2018-02-08 2019-08-15 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions associées
WO2021001400A1 (fr) 2019-07-02 2021-01-07 Novozymes A/S Variants de lipase et compositions de ceux-ci
WO2021037878A1 (fr) 2019-08-27 2021-03-04 Novozymes A/S Composition comprenant une lipase

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1712610B1 (fr) 2013-11-06
PL1712610T3 (pl) 2014-04-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8859480B2 (en) Detergent compositions
US9062279B2 (en) Laundry detergent compositions comprising lipolytic or lipase enzymes
EP1726636B1 (fr) Compositions de lavage
AU2006218400A1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1712610B1 (fr) Compositions de lavage
EP1867707B1 (fr) Compositions de lavage
US7465701B2 (en) Detergent composition
ES2373051T3 (es) Composiciones detergentes.
US20070197423A1 (en) Detergent compositions
EP1712611B1 (fr) Compositions de lavage

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070323

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20070725

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LANT, NEIL JOSEPH

Inventor name: PATTERSON, STEVEN GEORGE

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130925

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602006039086

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: LANT, NEIL JOSEPH

Inventor name: PATTERSON, STEVEN GEORGE

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: BOHEST AG, CH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 639511

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20131215

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V. / UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006039086

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602006039086

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2442893

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20140214

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20130402585

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20140124

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140306

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140306

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: DALLI-WERKE GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20140722

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA

Effective date: 20140806

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E020811

Country of ref document: HU

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140222

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V. / UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20131106

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V. / UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20131106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

APAH Appeal reference modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO

APAW Appeal reference deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDREFNO

APAY Date of receipt of notice of appeal deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDNOA2O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBM Appeal reference recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO

APBP Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: HENKEL AG & CO. KGAA

Effective date: 20140806

APBQ Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: UNILEVER N.V. / UNILEVER PLC

Effective date: 20131106

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20210112

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20210127

Year of fee payment: 16

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: DALLI-WERKE GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20140722

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20210308

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210209

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R103

Ref document number: 602006039086

Country of ref document: DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R064

Ref document number: 602006039086

Country of ref document: DE

APBU Appeal procedure closed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20211230

Year of fee payment: 17

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: MGE

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20211007

GBPR Gb: patent revoked under art. 102 of the ep convention designating the uk as contracting state

Effective date: 20211007

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20220112

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20220114

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20220125

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20220218

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20220130

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20220118

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20220120

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20220118

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20220118

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MA03

Ref document number: 639511

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20211007