EP1226788B1 - Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty system - Google Patents
Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1226788B1 EP1226788B1 EP02250206A EP02250206A EP1226788B1 EP 1226788 B1 EP1226788 B1 EP 1226788B1 EP 02250206 A EP02250206 A EP 02250206A EP 02250206 A EP02250206 A EP 02250206A EP 1226788 B1 EP1226788 B1 EP 1226788B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- patient
- femur
- tibia
- tensor
- knee
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
- A61B2034/102—Modelling of surgical devices, implants or prosthesis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/101—Computer-aided simulation of surgical operations
- A61B2034/105—Modelling of the patient, e.g. for ligaments or bones
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/10—Computer-aided planning, simulation or modelling of surgical operations
- A61B2034/108—Computer aided selection or customisation of medical implants or cutting guides
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2046—Tracking techniques
- A61B2034/2055—Optical tracking systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2068—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis using pointers, e.g. pointers having reference marks for determining coordinates of body points
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/20—Surgical navigation systems; Devices for tracking or guiding surgical instruments, e.g. for frameless stereotaxis
- A61B2034/2072—Reference field transducer attached to an instrument or patient
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/02—Devices for expanding tissue, e.g. skin tissue
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/38—Joints for elbows or knees
Definitions
- This invention relates to a surgical system, more particularly to a surgical system and apparatus for use in the course of a knee replacement operation.
- an image of the bones is displayed on a computer screen to the surgeon who has control of the computer at the operating table.
- a process to register the patient's actual bones from particular landmarks is undertaken which allows sensors fixed to the bones to coordinate the screen image with the patient. Bone cuts can then be made to suit the implant after sizing and judging the positions of the components on the computer screen.
- a basic technique thus provides that each of the components of the implant has controlled orientation relative to the bone onto which it will be implanted.
- This "landmark" technique replicates most existing systems for knee replacement that do not involve such a computer.
- United States Patent Specification No. 5,682,886 describes a method for planning surgery on a body portion, such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.
- the various steps to be used in the method of planning as applied in a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, as well as various sequences of steps to be carried out by the surgeon, are set out in the flow charts of Figs. 5, 8, 10, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 28, and 31 to 34.
- Figure 34 indicates as one of the steps, which is effected after insertion of the prosthetic components into the patient's resected tibia and femur: "Move knee through entire range of motion and test stability and tension in the ligaments".
- United States Patent Specification No. 5,800,438 discloses a surgical tool for use in knee arthroplasty to assist a surgeon to implant a knee prosthesis which will be stable when the knee is in flexion and in extension. Its use after resection of both tibia and femur is described.
- United States Patent Specification No. 5,733,292 describes an adjustable trial prosthesis or prosthetic component which is intended to provide a surgeon with the capability of efficiently and accurately examining a joint's functioning without having to remove a trial prosthesis insert and replace it with another sterilised insert.
- the known navigation process does not allow for correctly positioning the components such that the patient's soft tissues are correctly balanced in the two vitally important aspects required in successful total knee replacement.
- the first is to ensure that, at full extension of the knee, the medial and lateral tissues are correctly tensioned in an anatomically aligned knee.
- the second aspect is to ensure that the implants are chosen for size and positioned on the skeleton to ensure the correct balance of soft tissue tensions in both the extended and flexed knee.
- the invention accordingly seeks to provide a navigation apparatus which will enable a surgeon to ensure that, at full extension of the knee, the medial and lateral tissues are correctly tensioned in an aligned knee.
- the invention seeks to provide a surgical apparatus which will enable a surgeon to select, using a navigation computer, an implant having optimum dimensions and to implant this in optimal fashion in the patient's skeleton so as to ensure that there is the correct balance of soft tissue both in the extended knee and in the flexed knee.
- a system for use by a surgeon during implantation in a patient of a tibial implant and of a femoral implant in the course of a knee replacement operation comprising:
- the registration means comprises first marker means for attachment to the patient's tibia, second marker means for attachment to the patient's femur, and pointer means for touching significant features on the patient's tibia and femur, the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means being all adapted for operative coupling to the detector means.
- the detector means can comprise an infra-red camera, while the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means each carry infra-red reflector means.
- the detector means may comprise an ultrasonic emitter or receiver, whereas the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means each carry ultrasonic reflector or emitter means.
- the tensor means is adapted for effecting distraction of the patient's knee joint in the course of the knee replacement operation, either before or after resection of the patient's tibia.
- its function is to separate the ends of the tibia and femur and to tension the ligaments of the knee.
- the tensor means may comprise an inflatable balloon.
- it can be a hydraulic bag, a mechanical device having two parallel motion paddles, a mechanical device having a swivelling motion top paddle, a mechanical device having separate medial and lateral top paddles, a mechanical device having one central arm on to the femur, or a mechanical device having only a medial separation.
- the display means can be a conventional computer screen if the computer is supplied with a keyboard.
- the display means may comprise a touch operated screen. By placing the touch operated screen in the operating room within the reach of the surgeon the computer can be under the control of the surgeon who can call up at will the images that he wishes to inspect for the purpose of monitoring the status of the knee replacement operation and for planning his next move.
- the invention addresses soft tissue balancing of the knee in both flexion and extension whilst aided by the use of computer navigation and a physical distraction of the knee joint.
- Figure 1 illustrates a navigation computer 1 linked by a suitable lead 2 to a touch operated screen monitor 3.
- a pair of infra-red cameras 4, 5 are connected as indicated at 6, 7 to the screen 3.
- the patient's knee joint is exposed surgically in conventional fashion so as to expose the relevant portions of the patient's tibia T, and femur F.
- the patient's fibula L is also shown.
- the patient's tendons, blood vessels, patella, skin, fat, and muscle are not indicated in Figure 1 or in any of the other Figures.
- Pins 8, 9 fitted with infra-red sensors or reflectors 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are surgically attached to the patient's femur F and tibia T respectively.
- a hand-held pointer 16 which is also provided with a pin 17 fitted with infra-red sensors or reflectors 18, 19, and 20.
- Infra-red cameras 4, 5 map the positions of the sensors 10 to 12, 13 to 15, and 18 to 20 and the computer 1 is programmed so as to be able to display the positions of these sensors and to compute the corresponding positions of femur F and tibia T for display to the surgeon on screen 3.
- the computer's memory also holds images of the patient's leg obtained prior to the operation by computer aided tomography, as well as information about the available ranges of sizes of femoral and tibial components of the model of knee implant that the surgeon has decided to use.
- Figure 2 illustrates a first stage in the knee prosthesis implantation operation.
- a drill 21 is used to drill holes in the patient's tibia T to receive pins 22 to hold in place a tibial cutting block 23 which has holes 24 to receive pins 22 and a slot 25 for a saw for making the tibial cut.
- Computer screen 3 shows on the left side an anterio-posterior view T a of the top of the patient's tibia T and, on the right hand side, a lateral view T l the patient's tibia T.
- screen 3 indicates at of this stage of the operation the plane P T that is required by the design of femoral component of the implant selected for use by the surgeon.
- FIG. 3 there is shown the next stage of the operation.
- An inflatable balloon 26 has been inserted between the patient's femur F and resected tibia T.
- Balloon 26 can be inflated through tube 27 by means of a hand held bulb 28 which is provided with a pressure release valve 29 by means of which the inflated balloon 26 can be deflated to permit its removal from the patient's knee joint.
- Screen 3 shows on the left side an anterio-posterior view of the patient's resected tibia T and femur F, while on the right side of the screen there is shown a corresponding lateral view.
- Figure 4 shows the patient's knee in extension with the inflated balloon 26 in position.
- Screen 3 shows an anterio-posterior view of the patient's knee joint in this condition.
- Figure 5 shows screen 3 displaying the patient's knee in lateral view corresponding to Figure 4.
- Figure 6 there is shown the screen display on an enlarged scale indicating the tibia-femur space d 1 on an anterio-posterior view of the patient's knee in flexion after the surgeon has made the tibial cut P T .
- the amount of permissible rotation of the femur is indicated by ⁇ in Figure 6.
- the plane of the already made tibial cut P T is also shown in Figure 6.
- the spacing at the medial condyle C M and the lateral condyle C L can be adjusted by appropriate rotation of the patient's femur F.
- Figure 7 shows a lateral view corresponding to that of Figure 6.
- the overall implant size I o there are included the tibia thickness assessment T T , the tibia-femur space d 1 , and the femur cut size F C .
- These lines are added to the display by the computer program which uses the data loaded into the navigation computer's memory for this purpose.
- Figure 8 there is shown a further view of the patient's knee in the flexed position, illustrating how the surgeon uses the drill 21 to attach temporarily to the patient's femur F a cutting block 26 which is located in position on the patient's femur by means of pins 27, only one of which is visible in Figure 8.
- Block 26 is provided with slots 28, 29, 30 and 31 by means of which the surgeon can make the planned anterior cut F A and the planned posterior cut F P .
- the surgeon can then fit a further cutting block 32 to the patient's femur F, using drill 21 (as indicated at 21') to drill holes for pins 33 which are received in holes 34 in block 32.
- drill 21 as indicated at 21'
- This part of the operation block 26 is still in place on the patient's femur F and is used as a guide to position the block 32.
- Slot 35 in block 32 permits the surgeon to make the distal cut in the patient's femur F.
- the system of the invention can be used in the following manner:
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Surgical Instruments (AREA)
Description
- This invention relates to a surgical system, more particularly to a surgical system and apparatus for use in the course of a knee replacement operation.
- Navigation and robot systems are becoming an increasingly interesting area of technology in use for knee replacement. Several systems exist for navigation of the knee to aid alignment of the standard total knee bone cuts. In use of such systems the first step is for the patient to be scanned pre-operatively using computer aided tomography (or CT) techniques. In this way the three dimensional "form" of the patient's bones is stored in a computer's memory. In addition three dimensional data for the knee implant to be used by the surgeon, or for a range of possible knee implants which could be used by the surgeon, is also stored in the computer's memory.
- During the knee replacement operation an image of the bones is displayed on a computer screen to the surgeon who has control of the computer at the operating table. A process to register the patient's actual bones from particular landmarks is undertaken which allows sensors fixed to the bones to coordinate the screen image with the patient. Bone cuts can then be made to suit the implant after sizing and judging the positions of the components on the computer screen.
- A basic technique thus provides that each of the components of the implant has controlled orientation relative to the bone onto which it will be implanted. This "landmark" technique replicates most existing systems for knee replacement that do not involve such a computer.
- For example, United States Patent Specification No. 5,682,886 describes a method for planning surgery on a body portion, such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. This involves use of planning subsystem hardware which comprises a computer interfaced with a memory means for storing image data, as well as a visual display means. The various steps to be used in the method of planning as applied in a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, as well as various sequences of steps to be carried out by the surgeon, are set out in the flow charts of Figs. 5, 8, 10, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22, 28, and 31 to 34. Figure 34 indicates as one of the steps, which is effected after insertion of the prosthetic components into the patient's resected tibia and femur: "Move knee through entire range of motion and test stability and tension in the ligaments".
- Without a computer the sizing and positioning are done with relatively simple alignment fixtures. Thus, the navigation computer is adding little other than time and cost to the process.
- Some systems can go on to so called "robot" cutting of the bones from the data available.
- United States Patent Specification No. 5,800,438 discloses a surgical tool for use in knee arthroplasty to assist a surgeon to implant a knee prosthesis which will be stable when the knee is in flexion and in extension. Its use after resection of both tibia and femur is described.
- United States Patent Specification No. 5,733,292 describes an adjustable trial prosthesis or prosthetic component which is intended to provide a surgeon with the capability of efficiently and accurately examining a joint's functioning without having to remove a trial prosthesis insert and replace it with another sterilised insert.
- The known navigation process does not allow for correctly positioning the components such that the patient's soft tissues are correctly balanced in the two vitally important aspects required in successful total knee replacement. The first is to ensure that, at full extension of the knee, the medial and lateral tissues are correctly tensioned in an anatomically aligned knee. The second aspect is to ensure that the implants are chosen for size and positioned on the skeleton to ensure the correct balance of soft tissue tensions in both the extended and flexed knee.
- There is therefore a need for a surgical apparatus for enabling computer navigation during a knee replacement operation which enables the surgeon to ensure that, at full extension of the knee, the medial and lateral tissues are correctly tensioned in an aligned knee. In addition there is a need to provide a surgical apparatus which will enable a surgeon to select, using a navigation computer, an implant having optimum dimensions and to implant this in optimal fashion in the patient's skeleton so as to ensure that there is the correct balance of soft tissue both in the extended knee and in the flexed knee.
- The invention accordingly seeks to provide a navigation apparatus which will enable a surgeon to ensure that, at full extension of the knee, the medial and lateral tissues are correctly tensioned in an aligned knee. In addition the invention seeks to provide a surgical apparatus which will enable a surgeon to select, using a navigation computer, an implant having optimum dimensions and to implant this in optimal fashion in the patient's skeleton so as to ensure that there is the correct balance of soft tissue both in the extended knee and in the flexed knee.
- Thus according to the present invention there is provided a system for use by a surgeon during implantation in a patient of a tibial implant and of a femoral implant in the course of a knee replacement operation, the system comprising:
- a computer having memory for holding data relating to size and shape of at least one tibial implant and at least one femoral implant as well as data obtained during preoperative scanning of the patient relating to the tibia and femur of the patient and also data relating to the three dimensional position and orientation of at least one bone selected from the patient's tibia and the patient's femur obtained during the course of the knee replacement operation;
- display means for displaying images derived from data held in the memory of the computer relating to the patient's tibia, to the patient's femur, to the at least one tibial implant, and to the at least one femoral implant; and
- registration means for registering the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone during the course of the knee replacement operation;
- detector means connected to the computer and operatively coupled to registration means for detecting the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone during the course of the knee replacement operation, the detector means supplying to the computer data relating to the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone;
- an adjustable tensor for applying tension to the ligaments of the patient's knee in flexion or in extension and measuring a space between said tibia and femur
- the computer being programmed to display on the display means, inter alia, one or more of the following images derived from data held in the memory of the computer and depicting the position and orientation of:-
- (i) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in flexion and said space as measured by said tensor;
- (ii) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in extension; and said space as measured by said tensor;
- (iii) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in flexion and potential planes of cut for resection of the patient's femur and said space as measured by said tensor;
- (iv) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in extension and potential planes of cut for resection of the patient's femur and said space as measured by said tensor;
- (v) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in flexion and with at least one component selected from the tibial component and the femoral component as it will appear after implantation thereof and said space as measured by said tensor; and
- (vi) the patient's tibia and the patient's femur with the knee tensed by the tensor means in extension and with at least one component selected from the tibial component and the femoral component as it will appear after implantation thereof and said space as measured by said tensor.
- In a preferred system according to the invention the registration means comprises first marker means for attachment to the patient's tibia, second marker means for attachment to the patient's femur, and pointer means for touching significant features on the patient's tibia and femur, the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means being all adapted for operative coupling to the detector means. In such a system the detector means can comprise an infra-red camera, while the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means each carry infra-red reflector means. Alternatively the detector means may comprise an ultrasonic emitter or receiver, whereas the first marker means, the second marker means, and the pointer means each carry ultrasonic reflector or emitter means.
- The tensor means is adapted for effecting distraction of the patient's knee joint in the course of the knee replacement operation, either before or after resection of the patient's tibia. Thus its function is to separate the ends of the tibia and femur and to tension the ligaments of the knee. Normally it will be preferred for the tensor means to be adapted for use after resection of the patient's tibia. Thus the tensor means may comprise an inflatable balloon. Alternatively it can be a hydraulic bag, a mechanical device having two parallel motion paddles, a mechanical device having a swivelling motion top paddle, a mechanical device having separate medial and lateral top paddles, a mechanical device having one central arm on to the femur, or a mechanical device having only a medial separation.
- The display means can be a conventional computer screen if the computer is supplied with a keyboard. Alternatively the display means may comprise a touch operated screen. By placing the touch operated screen in the operating room within the reach of the surgeon the computer can be under the control of the surgeon who can call up at will the images that he wishes to inspect for the purpose of monitoring the status of the knee replacement operation and for planning his next move.
- The invention addresses soft tissue balancing of the knee in both flexion and extension whilst aided by the use of computer navigation and a physical distraction of the knee joint.
- In order that the invention may be clearing understood and readily carried into effect a preferred embodiment thereof, and its method of use, will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings, wherein:-
- Figure 1 is a perspective diagrammatic view of the femur and tibia of a patient undergoing a knee replacement operation and equipment in accordance with the invention which is utilised by the surgeon for effecting navigation of the knee during the operation;
- Figure 2 is a similar view to that of Figure 1 illustrating the affixing of a cutting block to the patient's tibia;
- Figure 3 is a similar view to those of Figures 1 and 2 illustrating physical distraction of the knee joint in flexion following the making of the tibial cut by the surgeon;
- Figure 4 is a similar view showing the knee in extension undergoing physical distraction with an anterio-posterior view on the computer screen;
- Figure 5 is a view of the computer screen showing a lateral view of the knee corresponding to the view of Figure 4;
- Figure 6 is computer screen view showing an anterio-posterior view of the patient's knee in flexion;
- Figure 7 is a lateral view corresponding to that of Figure 6; and
- Figure 8 illustrates the affixing of cutting blocks to the femur for making the necessary cuts to accommodate the selected femoral component of the knee prosthesis.
- Referring to the drawings, Figure 1 illustrates a navigation computer 1 linked by a suitable lead 2 to a touch operated screen monitor 3. A pair of infra-red cameras 4, 5 are connected as indicated at 6, 7 to the screen 3. The patient's knee joint is exposed surgically in conventional fashion so as to expose the relevant portions of the patient's tibia T, and femur F. The patient's fibula L is also shown. However, the patient's tendons, blood vessels, patella, skin, fat, and muscle are not indicated in Figure 1 or in any of the other Figures. Pins 8, 9 fitted with infra-red sensors or reflectors 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are surgically attached to the patient's femur F and tibia T respectively. Also illustrated in Figure 1 is a hand-held pointer 16 which is also provided with a pin 17 fitted with infra-red sensors or reflectors 18, 19, and 20.
- Infra-red cameras 4, 5 map the positions of the sensors 10 to 12, 13 to 15, and 18 to 20 and the computer 1 is programmed so as to be able to display the positions of these sensors and to compute the corresponding positions of femur F and tibia T for display to the surgeon on screen 3. The computer's memory also holds images of the patient's leg obtained prior to the operation by computer aided tomography, as well as information about the available ranges of sizes of femoral and tibial components of the model of knee implant that the surgeon has decided to use.
- Figure 2 illustrates a first stage in the knee prosthesis implantation operation. A drill 21 is used to drill holes in the patient's tibia T to receive pins 22 to hold in place a tibial cutting block 23 which has holes 24 to receive pins 22 and a slot 25 for a saw for making the tibial cut. Computer screen 3 shows on the left side an anterio-posterior view Ta of the top of the patient's tibia T and, on the right hand side, a lateral view Tl the patient's tibia T. In addition screen 3 indicates at of this stage of the operation the plane PT that is required by the design of femoral component of the implant selected for use by the surgeon.
- In Figure 3 there is shown the next stage of the operation. An inflatable balloon 26 has been inserted between the patient's femur F and resected tibia T. Balloon 26 can be inflated through tube 27 by means of a hand held bulb 28 which is provided with a pressure release valve 29 by means of which the inflated balloon 26 can be deflated to permit its removal from the patient's knee joint. Screen 3 shows on the left side an anterio-posterior view of the patient's resected tibia T and femur F, while on the right side of the screen there is shown a corresponding lateral view.
- Figure 4 shows the patient's knee in extension with the inflated balloon 26 in position. Screen 3 shows an anterio-posterior view of the patient's knee joint in this condition. Figure 5 shows screen 3 displaying the patient's knee in lateral view corresponding to Figure 4.
- In Figure 6 there is shown the screen display on an enlarged scale indicating the tibia-femur space d1 on an anterio-posterior view of the patient's knee in flexion after the surgeon has made the tibial cut PT. The amount of permissible rotation of the femur is indicated by θ in Figure 6. The plane of the already made tibial cut PT is also shown in Figure 6. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, by rotating the femur F, the spacing at the medial condyle CM and the lateral condyle CL can be adjusted by appropriate rotation of the patient's femur F. Also indicated in Figure 6 is a possible plane FA for the anterior femoral cut to be made by the surgeon and a possible position for the posterior cut FP to be made by the surgeon in the patient's femur.
- Figure 7 shows a lateral view corresponding to that of Figure 6. In this view there are included the overall implant size Io, the tibia thickness assessment TT, the tibia-femur space d1, and the femur cut size FC. These lines are added to the display by the computer program which uses the data loaded into the navigation computer's memory for this purpose.
- In Figure 8 there is shown a further view of the patient's knee in the flexed position, illustrating how the surgeon uses the drill 21 to attach temporarily to the patient's femur F a cutting block 26 which is located in position on the patient's femur by means of pins 27, only one of which is visible in Figure 8. Block 26 is provided with slots 28, 29, 30 and 31 by means of which the surgeon can make the planned anterior cut FA and the planned posterior cut FP.
- Having made the anterior cut FA and the posterior cut FP, the surgeon can then fit a further cutting block 32 to the patient's femur F, using drill 21 (as indicated at 21') to drill holes for pins 33 which are received in holes 34 in block 32. During this part of the operation block 26 is still in place on the patient's femur F and is used as a guide to position the block 32. Slot 35 in block 32 permits the surgeon to make the distal cut in the patient's femur F.
- The system of the invention can be used in the following manner:
- 1. The patient's leg is CT scanned and entered into the memory of the navigation computer 1 in the normal way provided by the systems available.
- 2. The knee is exposed in the normal way including removal of osteophytes and obvious soft tissue adhesions. The anterior cruciate is divided, if present, assuming that the intended implant cannot accommodate this ligament. The posterior cruciate ligament may be resected also at the choice of the surgeon.
- 3. The navigation landmarks for the end of the femur, the end of the tibia and the patella are registered as normal practice with the relevant system. For this purpose the surgeon can affix pins 8 and 9 to the patient's femur F and tibia T respectively and register pins 8 and 9 using pointer 16 and the markers 18 to 20 mounted thereon to indicate by means of the infra-red cameras 4 and 5 to the computer 1 the position of pins 8 and 9 in relation to the infra-red cameras 4 and 5. The infra-red cameras 4 and 5 can then track markers 10 to 12, 13 to 15, and 18 to 20, while computer 1 stores the relevant data provided by cameras 4 and 5 to permit the position and orientation of the tibia T and femur F to be displayed on the computer screen 3. This step is illustrated in Figure 1.
- 4. The computer 1 is then used to evaluate the tibia resection by establishing the plane PT that is required by the implant, e.g. a 7° posterior slope, and to cut just below the principal defect. If there is little erosion, the plane PT is set at about 4 mm below the medial condyle CM. Cutting block 23 is positioned and fixed onto the tibia T using the computer 1 and its navigation process and the tibia T resected, as indicated in Figure 2. Hence pointer 16 can be moved over the surface of tibia T and femur F until its position in the image on the computer screen 3 corresponds to the correct position for the tibial cut to be made on the plane PT. Alternatively, a robot driven by the computer 1 may be used to resect the tibia T on the chosen plane PT.
- 5. The knee is explored posteriorly for adhesions on the femur F and tibia T especially if there was any kind of fixed deformity, such as flexion, valgus or varus.
- 6. A physical spacer, such as inflatable balloon 26, is applied to the flexed knee, as illustrated in Figure 3, so that it is tensed gently but sufficiently to open the knee on the medial side to achieve the degree of tension (A-P drawer) that is closest to the normal knee tested this way. Instead of using inflatable balloon 26, other forms of physical spacer or tensor can be used. Thus, for example, a hydraulic bag could be used in place of inflatable balloon 26. Alternatively it could be a mechanical device having two parallel motion paddles, or a swivelling motion top paddle, or separate medial and lateral top paddles, or one central arm on to the femur, or only a medial separation. In use of any of these physical spacers, the physical spacer should be designed so as to be able to be locked in the desired open position. The spacer has a measurement scale to allow a direct reading of the gap obtained; this may optionally be linked into the computer 1 for display and/or for use as part of the further surgical procedure to be described below.
- 7. The navigation computer 1 is then consulted, as indicated in Figures 4 and 5, for the space d1 (see Figure 6) between the bones as recorded by the spacer 26 to verify one against the other. The flexion angle of the knee is adjusted to achieve a parallel line between the anterior femur as viewed from the side and the cut tibia. The computer view with alignment lines as illustrated in Figures 6 and 7 can assist in this.
- 8. A distal view onto the femur, as illustrated in Figure 6, is then chosen on the computer screen 3 and the rotation θ of the femur F assessed. If the implant design requires, or the surgeon chooses, a particular external rotation, the computer 1 can be adjusted to make such allowance. Alternatively the spacer 26 can be adjusted to register the chosen rotation on the computer screen 3 again using lines or angles displayed.
- 9. This flexion position is locked into the computer memory with particular attention to the relative three dimensional orientations and positions of the femur F and tibia T.
- 10. The tensor 26 is released, the knee fully extended and the tensor 26 reinserted into the knee and tensioned again. The tensor 26 in this position is preferably free to allow the leg alignment to be dictated by the patient's ligaments. If a mechanical spacer is used, it should rotate between its two paddles, one on the tibia T and the other on the distal femur F. Alternatively, two paddles could independently sit onto the femoral condyles CM and CL, or one could sit between the condyles CM and CL.
- 11. In this position with the knee "tensed" it should feel stable. The computer 1 can now be consulted to assess full extension which should be adjusted on the patient, if necessary. The valgus/varus alignment is then checked on the computer screen 3. If there is a valgus or varus deformity between the normal alignment of hip, knee and ankle centre it will be seen on the computer alignment. Any such deformity can be checked against the contra-lateral leg if it is regarded as normal. Any unsatisfactory alignment indicates fixed soft tissues that will require a soft tissue release procedure. This may be performed with the spacer 26 removed, then the alignment should be re-assessed with the spacer 26 replaced. The tight tissues may be palpated whilst the spacer 26 is in place. The computer 1 may be programmed to display a help screen to show the most likely and best sequence of tissue releases to be made.
- 12. Once the alignment is satisfactory and full extension is confirmed with the spacer 26 in place and providing a stable leg the computer 1 again is instructed to record the orientations in three dimensions of the femur F and the tibia T.
- 13. The knee can now be relaxed and the navigation computer 1 consulted to choose the optimum implant configuration for this patient. The two positions recorded above relate to the bone orientations, positions, and their relative positions in flexion and extension. The computer 1 also knows the implant geometry, and component thicknesses. With this information the component sizes can be calculated and the three dimensional positions of both the femoral implant and also the tibial implant easily fixed. The surgeon's judgement will be required to help in this process with options, for example on adjusting the femur anterior/posterior (AP) size I° and tibia thickness TT. For this purpose the computer 1 can be programmed to follow the following sequence of steps:-
- (a) The femur F is sized from the anterior cortex to the posterior condyles, via a template or dimensions of the different sizes of femoral implant available; a lateral and distal view can be displayed on one screen and the size and position in both planes chosen.
- (b) The lateral view of the femur and the femoral component in this position will then be used with the tibia in its tensed position to size the tibial component thickness TT.
- (c) This tibial component thickness TT will then be modelled on the tibia T in the extended tensed knee view and the femoral component position adjusted proximally/distally to fit the extended space.
- (d) These steps are stored in the memory of computer 1 and complete the choice and position of the tibial and femoral components with relation to fully balancing the two important elements in replacing the knee.
- 14. The femur cuts can then be made with the aid of computer 1 by navigation and/or using a robot to suit the relevant femoral and tibial components.
- 15. The spacer 26 can be used again after making the cuts to confirm the process of "balancing" and alignment on the computer 1. This may be especially useful if a considerable fixed deformity was present. In this instance, preliminary cuts could be made to help perform releases. The computer 1 could be used to indicate safe preliminary cut levels.
- 16. Tibia and femur implant fixation holes or features can be fixed from the navigation system. By again fitting the spacer 26, or fitting a tibia trial without fixation features and a femur trial, the extension, flexion and deep flexion positions can be assessed on the computer screen 3 and the ideal tibia position fixed.
- 17. The fixation holes or features, for example, the holes for pins 22 and 33, can then be made in the bone by computer navigation positioning of an instrument, or by robot.
- 18. The implants chosen by the computer 1 can be trialed for confirmation and fixed in the usual way.
- 19. The freedom between the components, leg alignment, and three dimensional positions can be further assessed on the computer screen 3 at this stage, recorded in the memory of computer 1, and used for further analysis. This method should ensure that the two trialed positions with the physical spacer 26 in flexion, then extension, and as recorded by the navigation computer 1, are reproduced with the implant.
Claims (6)
- A system for use by a surgeon during implantation in a patient of a tibial implant and of a femoral implant in the course of a knee replacement operation, the system comprising:a computer (1) having memory for holding data relating to size and shape of at least one tibial implant and at least one femoral implant as well as data obtained during preoperative scanning of the patient relating to the tibia (T) and femur (F) of the patient and also data relating to the three dimensional position and orientation of at least one bone selected from the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur(F) obtained during the course of the knee replacement operation;display means (3) for displaying images derived from data held in the memory of the computer (1) relating to the patient's tibia (T), to the patient's femur (F), to the at least one tibial implant, and to the at least one femoral implant; andregistration means (16) for registering the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone during the course of the knee replacement operation;detector means (4, 5) connected to the computer (1) and operatively coupled to registration means (8, 9, 16) for detecting the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone (T or F) during the course of the knee replacement operation, the detector means (4, 5) supplying to the computer (1) data relating to the three dimensional position and orientation of the at least one bone (T or F);an adjustable tensor (26) for applying tension to the ligaments of the patient's knee in flexion or in extension and measuring a space between said tibia (T) and femur (F);the computer (1) being programmed to display on the display means (3), inter alia, one or more of the following images derived from data held in the memory of the computer (1) and depicting the position and orientation of:-(i) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in flexion and said space as measured by said tensor;(ii) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in extension and said space as measured by said tensor;(iii) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in flexion and potential planes of cut for resection of the patient's femur (F); and said space as measured by said tensor;(iv) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in extension and potential planes of cut for resection of the patient's femur and said space as measured by said tensor;(v) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in flexion and with at least one component selected from the tibial component and the femoral component as it will appear after implantation thereof and said space as measured by said tensor; and(vi) the patient's tibia (T) and the patient's femur (F) with the knee tensed by the tensor (26) in extension and with at least one component selected from the tibial component and the femoral component as it will appear after implantation thereof and said space as measured by said tensor.
- A system according to Claim 1, wherein the registration means comprises first marker means (8) for attachment to the patient's tibia (T), second marker means (9) for attachment to the patient's femur (F), and pointer means (16) for touching significant features on the patient's tibia (T) and femur (F), and wherein the first marker means (8), the second marker means (9), and the pointer means (16) are all adapted for operative coupling to the detector means (4, 5).
- A system according to Claim 2, wherein the detector means comprises an infra-red camera (4, 5), and wherein the first marker means (8), the second marker means (9), and the pointer means (16) each carry infra-red reflector means (10, 11, 12 or 13, 14, 15 or 18, 19, 20).
- A system according to Claim 2, wherein the detector means comprises an ultrasonic emitter or receiver, and wherein the first marker means (8), the second marker means (9), and the pointer means (16) each carry ultrasonic reflector or emitter means.
- A system according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein the tensor (26) comprises an inflatable balloon.
- A system according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, wherein the tensor is selected from a hydraulic bag, a mechanical device having two parallel motion paddles, a mechanical device having a swivelling motion top paddle, a mechanical device having separate medial and lateral top paddles, a mechanical device having one central arm on to the femur, and a mechanical device having only a medial separation.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0101990 | 2001-01-25 | ||
GBGB0101990.0A GB0101990D0 (en) | 2001-01-25 | 2001-01-25 | Surgical system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1226788A1 EP1226788A1 (en) | 2002-07-31 |
EP1226788B1 true EP1226788B1 (en) | 2006-10-25 |
Family
ID=9907526
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02250206A Expired - Lifetime EP1226788B1 (en) | 2001-01-25 | 2002-01-11 | Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty system |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6859661B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1226788B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE60215561T2 (en) |
GB (1) | GB0101990D0 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7764985B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical navigation system component fault interfaces and related processes |
US7794467B2 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2010-09-14 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Adjustable surgical cutting systems |
US7862570B2 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2011-01-04 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical positioners |
US7983777B2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2011-07-19 | Mark Melton | System for biomedical implant creation and procurement |
US8109942B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2012-02-07 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer-aided methods, systems, and apparatuses for shoulder arthroplasty |
US8934961B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2015-01-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Trackable diagnostic scope apparatus and methods of use |
US9168153B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2015-10-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical alignment using references |
US11999065B2 (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2024-06-04 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Robotic surgical system with motorized movement to a starting pose for a registration or calibration routine |
USD1044829S1 (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2024-10-01 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
Families Citing this family (166)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7618451B2 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2009-11-17 | Conformis, Inc. | Patient selectable joint arthroplasty devices and surgical tools facilitating increased accuracy, speed and simplicity in performing total and partial joint arthroplasty |
DE19709960A1 (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 1998-09-24 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Method and device for preoperatively determining the position data of endoprosthesis parts |
US7635390B1 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2009-12-22 | Marctec, Llc | Joint replacement component having a modular articulating surface |
US6702821B2 (en) | 2000-01-14 | 2004-03-09 | The Bonutti 2003 Trust A | Instrumentation for minimally invasive joint replacement and methods for using same |
US7104996B2 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-12 | Marctec. Llc | Method of performing surgery |
US7909831B2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2011-03-22 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Systems used in performing femoral and tibial resection in knee surgery |
US7708741B1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2010-05-04 | Marctec, Llc | Method of preparing bones for knee replacement surgery |
US7715602B2 (en) | 2002-01-18 | 2010-05-11 | Orthosoft Inc. | Method and apparatus for reconstructing bone surfaces during surgery |
WO2003068090A1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2003-08-21 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Image-guided fracture reduction |
US8010180B2 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2011-08-30 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Haptic guidance system and method |
TW200304608A (en) | 2002-03-06 | 2003-10-01 | Z Kat Inc | System and method for using a haptic device in combination with a computer-assisted surgery system |
US11202676B2 (en) | 2002-03-06 | 2021-12-21 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Neural monitor-based dynamic haptics |
US8996169B2 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2015-03-31 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Neural monitor-based dynamic haptics |
US9155544B2 (en) * | 2002-03-20 | 2015-10-13 | P Tech, Llc | Robotic systems and methods |
US8180429B2 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2012-05-15 | Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. | Instrumentation and method for mounting a surgical navigation reference device to a patient |
US6980849B2 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2005-12-27 | Ricardo Sasso | Instrumentation and method for performing image-guided spinal surgery using an anterior surgical approach |
US6993374B2 (en) * | 2002-04-17 | 2006-01-31 | Ricardo Sasso | Instrumentation and method for mounting a surgical navigation reference device to a patient |
US8257360B2 (en) | 2002-04-30 | 2012-09-04 | Orthosoft Inc. | Determining femoral cuts in knee surgery |
US20040068263A1 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2004-04-08 | Benoit Chouinard | CAS bone reference with articulated support |
AU2002350671A1 (en) * | 2002-11-05 | 2004-06-07 | Aesculap Ag And Co. Kg | Method and device for determining the position of a knee-joint endoprosthesis |
US7094241B2 (en) | 2002-11-27 | 2006-08-22 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for achieving correct limb alignment in unicondylar knee arthroplasty |
US20040172044A1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2004-09-02 | Grimm James E. | Surgical instrument and method of positioning same |
US20070282347A9 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2007-12-06 | Grimm James E | Navigated orthopaedic guide and method |
WO2004069036A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US6988009B2 (en) | 2003-02-04 | 2006-01-17 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Implant registration device for surgical navigation system |
WO2004070580A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US6925339B2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2005-08-02 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Implant registration device for surgical navigation system |
JP4226367B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2009-02-18 | 財団法人日本自動車研究所 | Leg impactor for pedestrian protection test |
JP4231813B2 (en) | 2003-05-06 | 2009-03-04 | ツィマー ゲーエムベーハー | Traction equipment |
CA2527955A1 (en) | 2003-06-02 | 2005-01-06 | Stephen B. Murphy | Method and apparatus for providing a patient-specific pelvic coordinate system |
DE10348585A1 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2005-04-07 | Mathys Medizinaltechnik Ag | Hydraulic ligament tensioning device |
DE50309180D1 (en) * | 2003-09-13 | 2008-03-27 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE ANGLE BETWEEN FEMUR AND TIBIA |
US7641661B2 (en) | 2003-12-26 | 2010-01-05 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Adjustable resection guide |
CA2553368A1 (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2005-08-11 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer-assisted ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty |
US20050267353A1 (en) * | 2004-02-04 | 2005-12-01 | Joel Marquart | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US7993341B2 (en) | 2004-03-08 | 2011-08-09 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Navigated orthopaedic guide and method |
US8114086B2 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2012-02-14 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Navigated cut guide locator |
US20070073306A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2007-03-29 | Ryan Lakin | Cutting block for surgical navigation |
DE102004025612A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 | 2005-11-10 | Plus Endoprothetik Ag | Device for detecting a force-displacement characteristic of one or more bands, as well as methods for detecting the characteristic |
US8167888B2 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2012-05-01 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Tibial spacer blocks and femoral cutting guide |
US8007448B2 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2011-08-30 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co. Kg. | System and method for performing arthroplasty of a joint and tracking a plumb line plane |
JP2008521573A (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2008-06-26 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | System, method and apparatus for automated software flow using instrument detection during computer assisted surgery |
US8979853B2 (en) * | 2005-02-17 | 2015-03-17 | Lucas Anissian | Method and system for determining resection guidelines for joint replacement surgical procedures |
CA2601976A1 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2006-08-31 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | In-line milling system |
US20060241405A1 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2006-10-26 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Method and apparatus for performing an orthodepic stability test using a surgical navigation system |
US20060235290A1 (en) * | 2005-04-04 | 2006-10-19 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Method and apparatus for positioning a cutting tool for orthopedic surgery using a localization system |
JP2008539885A (en) * | 2005-05-02 | 2008-11-20 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | System and method for determining tibial rotation |
US7840256B2 (en) | 2005-06-27 | 2010-11-23 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Image guided tracking array and method |
EP1906857A1 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2008-04-09 | Cedara Software Corp. | Implant inventory management system and method using digital image planning |
US20070118055A1 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-24 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating surgical procedures involving custom medical implants |
US20070149977A1 (en) * | 2005-11-28 | 2007-06-28 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Surgical component positioner |
US20070179626A1 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2007-08-02 | De La Barrera Jose L M | Functional joint arthroplasty method |
US7744600B2 (en) * | 2006-01-10 | 2010-06-29 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Bone resection guide and method |
US7780671B2 (en) * | 2006-01-23 | 2010-08-24 | Zimmer Technology, Inc. | Bone resection apparatus and method for knee surgery |
US7885705B2 (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2011-02-08 | Murphy Stephen B | System and method for facilitating hip surgery |
US8323290B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2012-12-04 | Biomet Manufacturing Corp. | Tensor for use in surgical navigation |
US8165659B2 (en) | 2006-03-22 | 2012-04-24 | Garrett Sheffer | Modeling method and apparatus for use in surgical navigation |
EP2023844B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2017-06-21 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Apparatus for controlling a haptic device |
US8635082B2 (en) | 2006-05-25 | 2014-01-21 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Method and system for managing inventories of orthopaedic implants |
US8560047B2 (en) | 2006-06-16 | 2013-10-15 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Method and apparatus for computer aided surgery |
US20080319491A1 (en) | 2007-06-19 | 2008-12-25 | Ryan Schoenefeld | Patient-matched surgical component and methods of use |
US8718746B2 (en) * | 2007-06-21 | 2014-05-06 | Mardil, Inc. | Pericardial space imaging for cardiac support device implantation |
US8709054B2 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2014-04-29 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair |
US7867263B2 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2011-01-11 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable bone plate system and related method for spinal repair |
WO2009021144A2 (en) * | 2007-08-07 | 2009-02-12 | Transcorp, Inc. | Device for variably adjusting intervertebral distraction and lordosis |
US8382765B2 (en) | 2007-08-07 | 2013-02-26 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co. Kg. | Method of and system for planning a surgery |
US8273133B2 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2012-09-25 | Samuelson Kent M | Systems and methods for providing deeper knee flexion capabilities for knee prosthesis patients |
US8366783B2 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2013-02-05 | Samuelson Kent M | Systems and methods for providing deeper knee flexion capabilities for knee prosthesis patients |
US8382846B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2013-02-26 | Kent M. Samuelson | Systems and methods for providing deeper knee flexion capabilities for knee prosthesis patients |
US9872774B2 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2018-01-23 | Connor E. Samuelson | Systems and methods for providing a femoral component having a modular stem |
US9107769B2 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2015-08-18 | Kent M. Samuelson | Systems and methods for providing a femoral component |
US20160310279A1 (en) | 2007-08-27 | 2016-10-27 | Connor E. Samuelson | Systems and methods for providing lightweight prosthetic components |
WO2009036360A1 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2009-03-19 | Transcorp, Inc. | Device and method for tissue retraction in spinal surgery |
US8430882B2 (en) | 2007-09-13 | 2013-04-30 | Transcorp, Inc. | Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair systems and related methods |
EP2564793B1 (en) * | 2007-09-13 | 2014-08-20 | Transcorp, Inc. | Transcorporeal spinal decompression and repair system |
US20090088604A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | David Lowry | Vertebrally-mounted tissue retractor and method for use in spinal surgery |
US8858563B2 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2014-10-14 | Hipco, Inc. | Device and method for hip distention and access |
US8163021B2 (en) | 2007-11-27 | 2012-04-24 | Transcorp, Inc. | Methods and systems for repairing an intervertebral disc using a transcorporal approach |
AU2008335328B2 (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2014-11-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining the mechanical axis of a femur |
US8617171B2 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2013-12-31 | Otismed Corporation | Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide |
US8571637B2 (en) | 2008-01-21 | 2013-10-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patella tracking method and apparatus for use in surgical navigation |
US20090270928A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | Stone Ross G | Navigation tracker fixation device and method for use thereof |
JP5216949B2 (en) * | 2008-06-04 | 2013-06-19 | 国立大学法人 東京大学 | Surgery support device |
US8974462B2 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2015-03-10 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Devices and methods for minimally invasive access into a joint |
WO2009152470A1 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2009-12-17 | The Foundry, Llc. | Methods and apparatus for joint distraction |
WO2010107949A1 (en) * | 2009-03-17 | 2010-09-23 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distracting a joint, including the provision and use of a novel joint-spacing balloon catheter and a novel inflatable perineal post |
US9186181B2 (en) | 2009-03-17 | 2015-11-17 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distracting a joint |
US10426453B2 (en) | 2009-03-17 | 2019-10-01 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distracting a joint |
US12035902B2 (en) | 2009-03-17 | 2024-07-16 | Stryker Corporation | Method and apparatus for distracting a joint |
US8794977B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2014-08-05 | Lifemodeler, Inc. | Implant training system |
WO2010125474A2 (en) * | 2009-05-01 | 2010-11-04 | Blue Ortho | Device and method of determination of the knee flexion axis in computer assisted surgery |
US9259179B2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2016-02-16 | Orthosensor Inc. | Prosthetic knee joint measurement system including energy harvesting and method therefor |
EP2475313B1 (en) * | 2009-09-10 | 2016-07-20 | Exactech Inc. | Alignment guides for use in computer assisted orthopedic surgery to prepare a bone element for an implant |
US8721649B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2014-05-13 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Hip joint access using a circumferential wire and balloon |
US9011448B2 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2015-04-21 | Orthosensor Inc. | Orthopedic navigation system with sensorized devices |
US9161717B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2015-10-20 | Orthosensor Inc. | Orthopedic insert measuring system having a sealed cavity |
US8425569B2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2013-04-23 | Transcorp, Inc. | Implantable vertebral frame systems and related methods for spinal repair |
JP2013529968A (en) | 2010-06-11 | 2013-07-25 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | Equipment suitable for the patient |
EP2579807B1 (en) * | 2010-06-11 | 2015-05-13 | Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre | Method of forming patient-specific implant |
AU2011326601A1 (en) | 2010-11-08 | 2013-06-06 | Pivot Medical, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distracting a joint |
US9498231B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2016-11-22 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | On-board tool tracking system and methods of computer assisted surgery |
US11911117B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2024-02-27 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | On-board tool tracking system and methods of computer assisted surgery |
US10219811B2 (en) | 2011-06-27 | 2019-03-05 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | On-board tool tracking system and methods of computer assisted surgery |
US9839374B2 (en) * | 2011-09-23 | 2017-12-12 | Orthosensor Inc. | System and method for vertebral load and location sensing |
US9489869B2 (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2016-11-08 | Arizona Board Of Regents, On Behalf Of The University Of Arizona | Portable low cost computer assisted surgical trainer and assessment system |
US9271675B2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2016-03-01 | Orthosensor Inc. | Muscular-skeletal joint stability detection and method therefor |
US9622701B2 (en) | 2012-02-27 | 2017-04-18 | Orthosensor Inc | Muscular-skeletal joint stability detection and method therefor |
US10105149B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2018-10-23 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | On-board tool tracking system and methods of computer assisted surgery |
US9427336B2 (en) | 2013-08-23 | 2016-08-30 | Stryker Corporation | Intraoperative dynamic trialing |
US12082800B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2024-09-10 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Force measuring joint distraction lever |
US11253246B2 (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2022-02-22 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Electronic force measuring joint distraction lever and method of use thereof |
WO2015184135A1 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2015-12-03 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Force measuring joint distraction lever |
US20160015426A1 (en) | 2014-07-15 | 2016-01-21 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Bone positioning and cutting system and method |
US9687250B2 (en) | 2015-01-07 | 2017-06-27 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Bone cutting guide systems and methods |
WO2016134154A1 (en) | 2015-02-18 | 2016-08-25 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Pivotable bone cutting guide useful for bone realignment and compression techniques |
US9622805B2 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2017-04-18 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Bone positioning and preparing guide systems and methods |
US10849663B2 (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2020-12-01 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Bone cutting guide systems and methods |
EP3322361B1 (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2024-09-18 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Bone positioning guide |
EP4494582A2 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2025-01-22 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Tarsal-metatarsal joint procedure utilizing fulcrum |
EP3334356B1 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2024-10-02 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Fulcrum to be used during a procedure on the tarsal-metatarsal joint |
WO2017049056A1 (en) | 2015-09-18 | 2017-03-23 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Joint spacer systems and methods |
US10058393B2 (en) | 2015-10-21 | 2018-08-28 | P Tech, Llc | Systems and methods for navigation and visualization |
US12220137B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2025-02-11 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Cut guide for arthroplasty procedures |
US12178532B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2024-12-31 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Robotic alignment of a tool or pin with a virtual plane |
CN108348294A (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2018-07-31 | 思想外科有限公司 | Configuration is followed closely for the active robot in total knee arthroplasty |
US12082893B2 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2024-09-10 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Robotic pin placement |
WO2017160889A1 (en) | 2016-03-14 | 2017-09-21 | Mahfouz, Mohamed, R. | Ultra-wideband positioning for wireless ultrasound tracking and communication |
CN205649543U (en) * | 2016-04-05 | 2016-10-19 | 北京天智航医疗科技股份有限公司 | High accuracy optical tracking instrument |
US10512470B1 (en) | 2016-08-26 | 2019-12-24 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Osteotomy procedure for correcting bone misalignment |
US10524808B1 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2020-01-07 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Devices and techniques for performing an osteotomy procedure on a first metatarsal to correct a bone misalignment |
US11266512B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2022-03-08 | Orthosensor Inc. | Surgical apparatus to support installation of a prosthetic component and method therefore |
US11129605B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2021-09-28 | Orthosensor Inc. | Surgical apparatus to support installation of a prosthetic component and method therefore |
US11185425B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2021-11-30 | Orthosensor Inc. | Surgical tensor configured to distribute loading through at least two pivot points |
US11291437B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2022-04-05 | Orthosensor Inc. | Tilting surgical tensor to support at least one bone cut |
US11284873B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2022-03-29 | Orthosensor Inc. | Surgical tensor where each distraction mechanism is supported and aligned by at least two guide shafts |
AU2018332792B2 (en) | 2017-09-14 | 2024-07-25 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Non-symmetrical insert sensing system and method therefor |
US20190240046A1 (en) | 2018-02-02 | 2019-08-08 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Range of motion evaluation in orthopedic surgery |
US20190240045A1 (en) * | 2018-02-02 | 2019-08-08 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Soft tissue balancing in robotic knee surgery |
EP3785228B8 (en) | 2018-04-23 | 2024-01-24 | MAKO Surgical Corp. | System, method and software program for aiding in positioning of a camera relative to objects in a surgical environment |
CN109700529B (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2021-09-03 | 常州锦瑟医疗信息科技有限公司 | Navigation system for bendable rigid tissue |
JP2021531857A (en) | 2018-07-11 | 2021-11-25 | トリース メディカル コンセプツ,インコーポレイティド | Compression stretcher for angled and rearranged bones |
US11583323B2 (en) | 2018-07-12 | 2023-02-21 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Multi-diameter bone pin for installing and aligning bone fixation plate while minimizing bone damage |
US11607250B2 (en) | 2019-02-13 | 2023-03-21 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Tarsal-metatarsal joint procedure utilizing compressor-distractor and instrument providing sliding surface |
US11432811B2 (en) | 2019-05-09 | 2022-09-06 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Joint gap balancing lever and methods of use thereof |
JP7583787B2 (en) | 2019-08-07 | 2024-11-14 | トリース メディカル コンセプツ,インコーポレイティド | Biplanar instruments for bone cutting and joint realignment procedures |
US11666318B2 (en) | 2019-08-30 | 2023-06-06 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Distraction device with disposable force sensor pod |
US11889998B1 (en) | 2019-09-12 | 2024-02-06 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Surgical pin positioning lock |
US11986251B2 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2024-05-21 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Patient-specific osteotomy instrumentation |
WO2021051098A1 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2021-03-18 | Inmotus Medical Llc | Patient-specific surgical methods and instrumentation |
US11890039B1 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2024-02-06 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Multi-diameter K-wire for orthopedic applications |
WO2021061548A2 (en) | 2019-09-24 | 2021-04-01 | Mako Surgical Corp. | System and method for ligament balancing using robotically held device |
US11812978B2 (en) | 2019-10-15 | 2023-11-14 | Orthosensor Inc. | Knee balancing system using patient specific instruments |
US20210186643A1 (en) * | 2019-12-20 | 2021-06-24 | Endotact | Distraction device with reflector |
US20210228377A1 (en) | 2020-01-29 | 2021-07-29 | Howmedica Osteonics Corp. | Load Sensor Balancer Instruments |
AU2021212261A1 (en) | 2020-01-31 | 2022-08-18 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Metatarsophalangeal joint preparation and metatarsal realignment for fusion |
USD995790S1 (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2023-08-15 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Robotic surgical tool |
US12004816B2 (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2024-06-11 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Robotic surgical apparatus with positioning guide |
US12042944B2 (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2024-07-23 | Depuy Ireland Unlimited Company | Robotic surgical system with graphical user interface |
CN111759312A (en) * | 2020-05-07 | 2020-10-13 | 北京天智航医疗科技股份有限公司 | Force and gap measuring device, knee joint soft tissue balance measuring platform and measuring method |
EP4153071A4 (en) | 2020-05-19 | 2024-06-19 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Devices and techniques for treating metatarsus adductus |
EP4277553A4 (en) | 2021-01-18 | 2024-12-11 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | CONTOURED BONE PLATE HAVING A LOCKING SCREW FOR BONE COMPRESSION, PARTICULARLY ACROSS A TARSOMETATARSAL JOINT |
JP2024518797A (en) | 2021-05-20 | 2024-05-02 | トリース メディカル コンセプツ,インコーポレイティド | Cutting guide with integrated joint realignment features - Patents.com |
USD1057155S1 (en) | 2022-02-23 | 2025-01-07 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Lesser metatarsal cut guide with parallel cut faces |
USD1051382S1 (en) | 2022-02-23 | 2024-11-12 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Lesser metatarsal cut guide |
USD1011524S1 (en) | 2022-02-23 | 2024-01-16 | Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. | Compressor-distractor for the foot |
WO2024013642A2 (en) * | 2022-07-11 | 2024-01-18 | Rsip Vision Ltd. | Optimizing camera calibration targets for 2d to 3d reconstruction |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5219362A (en) * | 1991-02-07 | 1993-06-15 | Finsbury (Instruments) Limited | Knee prosthesis |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP3690802B2 (en) * | 1993-06-21 | 2005-08-31 | ハウメディカ・オステオニクス・コーポレイション | A device that detects the functional center of the hip joint during knee arthroplasty |
US5540696A (en) * | 1995-01-06 | 1996-07-30 | Zimmer, Inc. | Instrumentation for use in orthopaedic surgery |
US5733292A (en) * | 1995-09-15 | 1998-03-31 | Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation | Arthroplasty trial prosthesis alignment devices and associated methods |
GB2306653B (en) * | 1995-10-23 | 1999-12-15 | Finsbury | Surgical tool |
US5682886A (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1997-11-04 | Musculographics Inc | Computer-assisted surgical system |
DE19709960A1 (en) * | 1997-03-11 | 1998-09-24 | Aesculap Ag & Co Kg | Method and device for preoperatively determining the position data of endoprosthesis parts |
WO1999060939A1 (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 1999-12-02 | Orthosoft, Inc. | Interactive computer-assisted surgical system and method thereof |
EP1161194B1 (en) * | 1999-03-17 | 2006-04-26 | SYNTHES AG Chur | Imaging and planning device for ligament graft placement |
EP1190676B1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2003-08-13 | BrainLAB AG | Device for determining the position of a cutting guide |
-
2001
- 2001-01-25 GB GBGB0101990.0A patent/GB0101990D0/en not_active Ceased
-
2002
- 2002-01-11 DE DE60215561T patent/DE60215561T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-11 EP EP02250206A patent/EP1226788B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-01-23 US US10/055,415 patent/US6859661B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5219362A (en) * | 1991-02-07 | 1993-06-15 | Finsbury (Instruments) Limited | Knee prosthesis |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7862570B2 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2011-01-04 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical positioners |
US8491597B2 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2013-07-23 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. (partial interest) | Surgical positioners |
US7764985B2 (en) | 2003-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical navigation system component fault interfaces and related processes |
US7794467B2 (en) | 2003-11-14 | 2010-09-14 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Adjustable surgical cutting systems |
US8109942B2 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2012-02-07 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer-aided methods, systems, and apparatuses for shoulder arthroplasty |
US7983777B2 (en) | 2005-08-19 | 2011-07-19 | Mark Melton | System for biomedical implant creation and procurement |
US8934961B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2015-01-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Trackable diagnostic scope apparatus and methods of use |
US9168153B2 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2015-10-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical alignment using references |
US11999065B2 (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2024-06-04 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Robotic surgical system with motorized movement to a starting pose for a registration or calibration routine |
US12214501B2 (en) | 2020-10-30 | 2025-02-04 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Robotic surgical system with recovery alignment |
USD1044829S1 (en) | 2021-07-29 | 2024-10-01 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US6859661B2 (en) | 2005-02-22 |
US20020115934A1 (en) | 2002-08-22 |
EP1226788A1 (en) | 2002-07-31 |
DE60215561T2 (en) | 2007-08-23 |
DE60215561D1 (en) | 2006-12-07 |
GB0101990D0 (en) | 2001-03-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1226788B1 (en) | Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty system | |
JP4754215B2 (en) | Instruments, systems and methods for computer assisted knee arthroplasty | |
AU680267B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for locating functional structures of the lower leg during knee surgery | |
US5871018A (en) | Computer-assisted surgical method | |
EP1870053B1 (en) | Apparatus for obtaining an axis of an intramedullary canal | |
US20060271056A1 (en) | System and method for modular navigated osteotome | |
US20030018338A1 (en) | Methods and tools for femoral resection in primary knee surgery | |
EP3383284B1 (en) | Alignment device | |
US20020198451A1 (en) | Surgical navigation systems and processes for high tibial osteotomy | |
US20070066917A1 (en) | Method for simulating prosthetic implant selection and placement | |
Decking et al. | Robotic total knee arthroplasty the accuracy of CT-based component placement | |
WO1988007840A1 (en) | Preoperative planning of bone cuts/joint replacement | |
EP1501406A2 (en) | Computer-based training methods for surgical procedures | |
WO2017077324A1 (en) | Femoral jig | |
WO2007067150A1 (en) | Computer assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty | |
Stiehl et al. | CT-free-based-navigation systems | |
Stiehl et al. | Navigation and soft-tissue balancing of LCS total knee arthroplasty | |
Cases et al. | Surgical Management | |
Strauss et al. | Navigation and Soft-Tissue Balancing of LCS TKA | |
Stiehl et al. | Fluoroscopy-Based Navigation in Genes II Total Knee Arthroplasty with the Medtronic» Viking « |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030131 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030821 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB LI |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: WILLIAM BLANC & CIE CONSEILS EN PROPRIETE INDUSTRI Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20061207 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20070726 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PFA Owner name: FINSBURY (DEVELOPMENT) LIMITED Free format text: FINSBURY (DEVELOPMENT) LIMITED#13 MOLE BUSINESS PARK, RANDALLS ROAD#LEATHERHEAD, SURREY KT22 0BA (GB) -TRANSFER TO- FINSBURY (DEVELOPMENT) LIMITED#13 MOLE BUSINESS PARK, RANDALLS ROAD#LEATHERHEAD, SURREY KT22 0BA (GB) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PCAR Free format text: NOVAGRAAF SWITZERLAND SA;CHEMIN DE L'ECHO 3;1213 ONEX (CH) |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MUELLER FOTTNER STEINECKE RECHTSANWAELTE PATEN, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20120726 AND 20120801 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: MATORTHO LTD., GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: FINSBURY (DEVELOPMENT) LTD., LEATHERHEAD, GB Effective date: 20120906 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MUELLER FOTTNER STEINECKE RECHTSANWAELTE PATEN, DE Effective date: 20120906 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: MATORTHO LTD., LEATHERHEAD, GB Free format text: FORMER OWNER: FINSBURY (DEVELOPMENT) LTD., LEATHERHEAD, SURREY, GB Effective date: 20120906 Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: MUELLER FOTTNER STEINECKE RECHTSANWAELTE PATEN, DE Effective date: 20120306 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20130220 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20130115 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20130115 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140131 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140801 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20140930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 60215561 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140801 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140131 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20180129 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20190111 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190111 |