[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1220972B1 - Underbalanced perforation - Google Patents

Underbalanced perforation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1220972B1
EP1220972B1 EP00964443A EP00964443A EP1220972B1 EP 1220972 B1 EP1220972 B1 EP 1220972B1 EP 00964443 A EP00964443 A EP 00964443A EP 00964443 A EP00964443 A EP 00964443A EP 1220972 B1 EP1220972 B1 EP 1220972B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
well
chamber
casing
fluid
liquid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00964443A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1220972A1 (en
Inventor
James Anderson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Andertech Ltd
Original Assignee
Andertech Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Andertech Ltd filed Critical Andertech Ltd
Publication of EP1220972A1 publication Critical patent/EP1220972A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1220972B1 publication Critical patent/EP1220972B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/08Controlling or monitoring pressure or flow of drilling fluid, e.g. automatic filling of boreholes, automatic control of bottom pressure
    • E21B21/085Underbalanced techniques, i.e. where borehole fluid pressure is below formation pressure
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B21/00Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
    • E21B21/16Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor using gaseous fluids

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the extraction of fluids, especially hydrocarbons.
  • a method of removing these hydrocarbons, and apparatus suitable for performing the method, is described hereinafter.
  • the invention finds particular use in the oil and gas industry during the extraction of natural gas or oil from a low pressure reservoir.
  • Extracting hydrocarbons from deep wells or at these previously worked sites requires an artificial lifting system to bring the hydrocarbons to the surface.
  • the system includes pumping means associated with a well head assembly or "tree" and a riser tubing within a well casing. Poor natural pressure reservoirs may be worked using fluid displacement systems e.g. pumping brine into a reservoir to displace hydrocarbons to surface.
  • Reservoir pressure is detectable as a fluid pressure in a borehole or well whenever an oil or gas reservoir has been intercepted by that borehole or well.
  • hydrostatic pressure or head of drilling fluid (commonly "mud")
  • the hydrostatic head is the pressure exerted by a column of liquid, having a given density, above a point a given distance below. If the hydrostatic column of mud is greater than the reservoir pressure then an overbalance exists. This overbalance keeps the well stable and prevents the hydrocarbon being produced into the well bore.
  • US-A-5,636,636 discloses a method of determining the inflow rate of solely gas or solely liquid into a well being completed in an underbalanced state and monitoring the pressure in this well after perforation.
  • This document describes a tubing string extending downwardly inside the bore of a well casing string which in turn extends into a formation containing fluid.
  • the well is then conditioned to create an underbalanced state which leaves a gas f illed space above any residual liquid in the well bore.
  • the levels of the liquid in both the bore of the tubing and the annulus formed between the casing and the tubing can be determined by testing.
  • the casing is then perforated to permit fluid from the formation to flow into the wellbore.
  • An object of the present invention is to obviate or mitigate at least some or all of the disadvantages of the known underbalance methods and to further improve hydrocarbon production techniques.
  • a further object of the invention is to offer the industry an environmentally acceptable method of underbalancing a well.
  • a still further object of the invention is to provide a tool for use in underbalancing a well which tool is of a relatively simple design, offering advantages in ease of installation and safety.
  • the present invention provides a method of initiating production as specified in claim 1.
  • a key feature recognisable in the method is that the steps required to achieve the pressure underbalance adjustments are undertaken "topside" of the well, rather than down at the reservoir depths. Furthermore, the pressure adjustments are achievable using environmentally safe methods utilising gas and fluids which are recoverable within the proposed protocols. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method is recognisable in that the invention selectively substitutes a part of the volume of the fluid standing over the hydrocarbon with a corresponding volume of gas to effect the necessary pressure adjustments.
  • the displaceable liquid to be used in the underbalance method of the invention may be a typical completion fluid or brine, containing sodium chloride or calcium chloride, for example.
  • the sealing step may further include cementing the casing in place by filling the annular space between the casing and the bore hole. This prevents any unwanted fluids entering the annular space.
  • the gaseous material used may consist of, or include nitrogen.
  • a method of underbalancing a well which does not have sufficient pressure to provide flow from a reservoir to be tapped, by introduction of a gas to displace fluid from tubing forming part of the well characterised by installing in an upper part of the well tubing remote from the reservoir an underbalance tool having means for pumping fluids separately therethrough and an associated tool tubing of narrower bore than the well tubing and of a pre-selected length capable of penetrating into the well tubing to a predetermined depth to permit exchange of fluid in the well for gas, locating the tool tubing within the well tubing, operatively connecting the tool and its tubing to permit fluid flow therein, providing a controllable gas supply to said tool, operating the tool to deliver gas and displacing fluid from the well tubing by means of said gas to achieve underbalance.
  • Such a method is useful at the stage of completion, ideally on new wells with cemented casings or liners, but is applicable whenever the well is in a dead, killed or overbalance status.
  • the method is also applicable for minimising the risks of hydrate formation when a well has been suspended and re-entered.
  • the well has been pre-perforated or uses slotted liners, it is possible to apply the method by utilising the tool in conjunction with a downhole plug system.
  • the proposed method is particularly suited to low pressure reservoirs which cannot be underbalanced using a fluid medium.
  • the invention further provides an apparatus for use in the start up of production of hydrocarbon from a well as specified in claim 12.
  • said tubing attachable to said body is provided with a foraminated bull nose distal end.
  • the present proposal offers a quick, technically simple and cheap opportunity for underbalancing a well with a minimum risk of environmental discharge into the sea.
  • the invention offers a simple cost effective way of ensuring full hydra testing is carried out on wells requiring re-entry thereby minimising the risks of hydrate formation and reducing re-entry costs.
  • the present invention is also ideally suited to low pressure reservoirs which cannot be underbalanced using a fluid medium.
  • a well borehole 10 being drilled with a conventional drill bit 20 and a drill pipe 40 to the depth of the reservoir section 20.
  • Casing 30 is placed inside the borehole 10 as a lining to secure the hole and prevent the walls from collapsing.
  • the casing 30 is run soon after drilling the first hundred metres or so of the hole 10.
  • Sections of the casing are coupled together as with drill pipe, but they may be welded together, threaded or interlocked, and when the string reaches the required depth it is cemented in position, as shown in Fig.2. With the drill pipe in place an annulus is formed, up which drilling fluid and cuttings may travel to the surface. A deep hole will need several concentric runs of reducing diameter to make up a casing programme.
  • Primary cementing is the first job in a casing cementing programme, which takes place soon after the casing has been run. After the drill string has been removed cement is pumped down the inside of the casing to clear the hole of mud. A cementing plug is then inserted, followed by drilling fluid, which forces the cement to the bottom of the hole and up into the space between casing and hole, or between casings, until it reaches the surface along with any remaining mud. This is known as cementing up. When set, the cement 60 keeps the casing 50 in place and secures the hole against the ingress of unwanted fluids by filling the annular space between the casing and the bore wall. This provides an added barrier to the well over and above the mud column used in the drilling phase.
  • the unperforated cemented casing 50 also retains the reservoir pressure at the reservoir depth.
  • the well bore fluid is exchanged from a relatively high density drilling mud to a lower density completion fluid 110 such as a brine containing for example sodium chloride or calcium chloride which has a weight of 10ppg (997.763kg/m 3 ).
  • a relatively high density drilling mud such as a brine containing for example sodium chloride or calcium chloride which has a weight of 10ppg (997.763kg/m 3 ).
  • a lower density completion fluid 110 such as a brine containing for example sodium chloride or calcium chloride which has a weight of 10ppg (997.763kg/m 3 ).
  • the blade type or wire brush scrapers are used as a mechanical means to scrape the internal wall of the casing down to the bottom of the well. This process removes any mud cake, which has built up on the casing well by pumping sea water into the wellbore until the fluid returns have reached the required level of cleanliness.
  • the prefiltered completion brine is circulated into the wellbore.
  • the fluid column is still overbalanced by 80psi (551.58kN/m 2 ) at this stage.
  • the well 10 is completed by installing a down hole safety valve 70, a packer 80, connection tubulars 90, and a wellhead 100. After completion, the well is still overbalanced by 80psi (551.58kN/m 2 ).
  • the well After completion of the well has been successfully carried out, the well is in a condition which enables it to be underbalanced with a view to facilitating production.
  • the underbalance is achieved by running 600 feet (182.88m) of slip pipe 120 into the completion zone 130. Nitrogen 150 is then pumped under pressure into the well to remove the upper part-volume of the fluid column down to a level 160 at the end of the slim pipe 120.
  • the pump pressure required through the system is a function of how deep the slim pipe 120 is run into the well and the density of the completion fluid 110.
  • the pressure range is a function of the differential pressure at the drilling tool 20 and the rate at which the nitrogen is being pumped
  • the return line 140 for the completion fluid/nitrogen to the surge tank on deck (not shown) is choked back. This ensures that a back pressure is maintained during the nitrogen pumping operation.
  • the system can be operated from a minimum pressure of 50psi (344.74kN/m 2 ) to a maximum operating pressure of 5000psi (34473.8kN/m 2 ).
  • each productive horizon is completed by making permanent contact between it and the well bore, and installing tubing and the appropriate equipment for controlling fluid flow. Contact with each horizon may be achieved directly or by perforating the casing, as shown in Fig.5, using wireline guns 180. Completions may be single or multiple completions and separate tubings are run according to the number of productive zones. This causes the fluid level 160 to rise, offloading the well in the process.
  • Fig. 6 shows the well in the production phase after a production tree 190 has been fitted.
  • the method described eliminates the complex mechanisms and procedures utilised by existing methods. Benefit is gained from the fact that the present invention can be used to underbalance a well extremely quickly and at a far lower cost than can be achieved using existing methods.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Perforating, Stamping-Out Or Severing By Means Other Than Cutting (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)
  • Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)
  • Drilling And Boring (AREA)
  • Processing And Handling Of Plastics And Other Materials For Molding In General (AREA)
  • Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

There is disclosed a method of initiating production of hydrocarbons from a well having a column of liquid to provide a hydrostatic head. The method comprises inserting a tubular member inside a casing to a required depth in the liquid to define a chamber, then sealing the chamber from the outside environment. A gaseous material is then supplied under pressure to the chamber to create a pressure differential between the chamber and the outside environment, and cause the liquid to be displaced and flow along a flow conduit. The displaced liquid is collected and the casing perforated to enable hydrocarbons to flow. An apparatus is provided and includes a tubular member for insertion into the well casing, means for sealing the chamber, gas supply means to supply gas under pressure to the chamber, fluid flow means to allow collection of displaced liquid, and means to perforate the casing.

Description

  • The present invention relates to the extraction of fluids, especially hydrocarbons. A method of removing these hydrocarbons, and apparatus suitable for performing the method, is described hereinafter. The invention finds particular use in the oil and gas industry during the extraction of natural gas or oil from a low pressure reservoir.
  • Natural reservoirs of hydrocarbons in the form of oil and gas have been exploited commercially with varying degrees of success since the mid- to late nineteenth century. However, the need for a petrochemical industry has steadily and rapidly developed since around 1900 and during this time readily accessible reservoirs at land based sites have been depleted so that currently exploitation is mainly concerned with off-shore, often deep water sites. The need often arises to re-work older sites previously considered as depleted by the technology available at the time the sites were first exploited. The natural drive of these sites may have become exhausted or so weak that though deposits of desirable hydrocarbons remain, the recovery thereof awaits a cost-effective technology.
  • Extracting hydrocarbons from deep wells or at these previously worked sites requires an artificial lifting system to bring the hydrocarbons to the surface. The system includes pumping means associated with a well head assembly or "tree" and a riser tubing within a well casing. Poor natural pressure reservoirs may be worked using fluid displacement systems e.g. pumping brine into a reservoir to displace hydrocarbons to surface.
  • Care has to be taken for environmental reasons in extracting hydrocarbons. Thus it is essential that any oil production facility can reliably control the output of each well associated therewith. Therefore, it is necessary to have complete control over pressure in the wells. Established techniques exist for countering the natural pressure of a reservoir by applying over-pressure relative to the natural reservoir pressure by means of a column of mud or completion fluid in the well.
  • Reservoir pressure is detectable as a fluid pressure in a borehole or well whenever an oil or gas reservoir has been intercepted by that borehole or well. As a generalisation it is lower than the hydrostatic pressure, or head of drilling fluid (commonly "mud"), and varies with depth, but reservoir pressure is affected by many factors, and may be considerably higher or lower than normal. The hydrostatic head is the pressure exerted by a column of liquid, having a given density, above a point a given distance below. If the hydrostatic column of mud is greater than the reservoir pressure then an overbalance exists. This overbalance keeps the well stable and prevents the hydrocarbon being produced into the well bore.
  • Consequently, for a well to operate productively, it is necessary to achieve a controllable underbalance of these pressures, i.e. selectively arrange for the reservoir pressure to be greater than the hydrostatic pressure of fluid over the reservoir. It is imperative that this underbalance is achieved in a controlled and safe manner to avoid the potential for hazardous losses of hydrocarbons with attendant risks of endangering personnel and equipment due to fire and explosions, and environmental pollution.
  • Generally the initial pressure encountered when a borehole first intercepts a reservoir only partly affects the ability of oil or gas to subsequently flow up the completed well: the most important factor being the drive mechanism.
  • This is well understood by those in the art and much has been written concerning drive mechanisms and techniques for enhancing the natural drive or applying an induced force which is needed to drive oil or gas out of a reservoir and up the well bore. The literature describes many drive mechanisms used in modern well technology including dissolved gas drive, water drive, gas cap drive, gas drive, miscible flooding and gravity drainage. Gas or water pressure is carefully controlled in a pressure maintenance program, so that pressure is just sufficient to drive the hydrocarbons to the surface. A pressure maintenance program might make use of a combination of techniques employed to sustain the natural pressure in a producing well to ensure continuous production at the required rate. Water drive and gas drive are two practical methods which are frequently used in combination with re-injection mechanisms. Water or gas is then injected through service wells.
  • However, known methods currently applied in the oil and gas industry for enhancing the natural drive of a reservoir or underbalancing wells include using oil base products or a full coiled tubing lift. The use of oil base fluids for this type of operation has the inherent high risks of pollution causing major problems for companies working in environmentally sensitive areas offshore. This inevitably results in production shut downs which have a severe financial impact on the earning potential of the company involved.
  • Conventional methods involving coiled tubing also suffer from inherent problems given the very time-consuming nature of the method. By having to feed lengths of coiled tubing the fully into the well until the reservoir depth has been reached, in some cases 4000 feet (1219.2 metres) or more, many hours of valuable production time have been lost. Added to this is the major cost of maintaining personnel and equipment on standby whilst the coiled tubing is being fed into the well which is still not in production mode as yet. In some instances, times of 36 hours constant feeding of coiled tubing to reach the reservoir depth are not unknown. Such a method is an expensive and time consuming procedure to carry out.
  • US-A-5,636,636 discloses a method of determining the inflow rate of solely gas or solely liquid into a well being completed in an underbalanced state and monitoring the pressure in this well after perforation. This document describes a tubing string extending downwardly inside the bore of a well casing string which in turn extends into a formation containing fluid. The well is then conditioned to create an underbalanced state which leaves a gas f illed space above any residual liquid in the well bore. The levels of the liquid in both the bore of the tubing and the annulus formed between the casing and the tubing can be determined by testing. The casing is then perforated to permit fluid from the formation to flow into the wellbore.
  • Scott et al, in an article in SPE Drilling and Completion, December 1995, pp219-225 entitled "Air Foam improves efficiency of completion and workover operations in low-pressure gas wells", describe the use of portable air form units in circulating operations and the use of these units as an alternative to foamed nitrogen for both conventional and coiled tubing. The paper also states that blowing liquids out of the wellbore to create an underbalanced condition before perforating are newer uses of these units. It goes on to describe how the surfactants, inhibitors and other needed chemicals are mixed prior to injection. The document then describes how a good quality foam is produced by impinging the air and liquid streams in a high turbulence foam generator.
  • An object of the present invention is to obviate or mitigate at least some or all of the disadvantages of the known underbalance methods and to further improve hydrocarbon production techniques. A further object of the invention is to offer the industry an environmentally acceptable method of underbalancing a well. A still further object of the invention is to provide a tool for use in underbalancing a well which tool is of a relatively simple design, offering advantages in ease of installation and safety.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of initiating production as specified in claim 1.
  • This enables the well to be underbalanced much quicker than is possible using conventional methods and at a greatly reduced cost. A key feature recognisable in the method is that the steps required to achieve the pressure underbalance adjustments are undertaken "topside" of the well, rather than down at the reservoir depths. Furthermore, the pressure adjustments are achievable using environmentally safe methods utilising gas and fluids which are recoverable within the proposed protocols. Furthermore, the simplicity of the method is recognisable in that the invention selectively substitutes a part of the volume of the fluid standing over the hydrocarbon with a corresponding volume of gas to effect the necessary pressure adjustments. The safety inherent in the method is recognisable in that both the supplied gas, preferably an inert gas like nitrogen, and the displaced fluid, preferably an aqueous completion fluid, are recoverable without loss to ambient, and the thus underbalanced well is thereafter controllable in a manner known in the art.
  • The displaceable liquid to be used in the underbalance method of the invention may be a typical completion fluid or brine, containing sodium chloride or calcium chloride, for example.
  • The sealing step may further include cementing the casing in place by filling the annular space between the casing and the bore hole. This prevents any unwanted fluids entering the annular space.
  • The gaseous material used may consist of, or include nitrogen.
  • Thus according to the invention, there is provided a method of underbalancing a well which does not have sufficient pressure to provide flow from a reservoir to be tapped, by introduction of a gas to displace fluid from tubing forming part of the well characterised by installing in an upper part of the well tubing remote from the reservoir an underbalance tool having means for pumping fluids separately therethrough and an associated tool tubing of narrower bore than the well tubing and of a pre-selected length capable of penetrating into the well tubing to a predetermined depth to permit exchange of fluid in the well for gas, locating the tool tubing within the well tubing, operatively connecting the tool and its tubing to permit fluid flow therein, providing a controllable gas supply to said tool, operating the tool to deliver gas and displacing fluid from the well tubing by means of said gas to achieve underbalance.
  • Such a method is useful at the stage of completion, ideally on new wells with cemented casings or liners, but is applicable whenever the well is in a dead, killed or overbalance status. Thus the method is also applicable for minimising the risks of hydrate formation when a well has been suspended and re-entered. Where the well has been pre-perforated or uses slotted liners, it is possible to apply the method by utilising the tool in conjunction with a downhole plug system. The proposed method is particularly suited to low pressure reservoirs which cannot be underbalanced using a fluid medium.
  • The invention further provides an apparatus for use in the start up of production of hydrocarbon from a well as specified in claim 12.
  • Preferably, said tubing attachable to said body is provided with a foraminated bull nose distal end.
  • The present proposal offers a quick, technically simple and cheap opportunity for underbalancing a well with a minimum risk of environmental discharge into the sea. In addition to offering financial benefits for new installations, the invention offers a simple cost effective way of ensuring full hydra testing is carried out on wells requiring re-entry thereby minimising the risks of hydrate formation and reducing re-entry costs. The present invention is also ideally suited to low pressure reservoirs which cannot be underbalanced using a fluid medium.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • Embodiments of the present invention will now be described by way of example only with reference to the following drawings, in which:
  • Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a reservoir section being drilled;
  • Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic representation of a casing and a cemented liner after insertion into the hydrocarbon well;
  • Fig. 3 is a diagrammatic representation of the well after completion;
  • Fig. 4 is a diagrammatic representation of the underbalanced well in accordance with the present invention;
  • Fig. 5 is a diagrammatic representation of a perforated underbalanced well in accordance with the present invention; and
  • Fig. 6 is a diagrammatic representation of the underbalanced well during the production phase of the well.
  • Detailed Description of Exemplary Embodiment
  • Referring to Fig 1, there is shown schematically a well borehole 10 being drilled with a conventional drill bit 20 and a drill pipe 40 to the depth of the reservoir section 20. Casing 30 is placed inside the borehole 10 as a lining to secure the hole and prevent the walls from collapsing. The casing 30 is run soon after drilling the first hundred metres or so of the hole 10. At this drilling stage, the well 10 is full of kill weight mud. This means that the hydrostatic column of mud is greater than the reservoir pressure. This is illustrated by calculating the pressures using the following formula: p = 0.052 gh,
  • Where
  • p is in psi;
  • g is in pounds per gallon; and
  • h is in feet.
  • Where the reservoir depth is 4000 feet (1219.2 metres), as indicated by point P, and the mud weight is 11 ppg (pounds per gallon) (1097.54kg/m3) then the hydrostatic head equals: 0.052 x 11 x 4000 = 2288psi (15775.2KN/m2)hydrostatic As the reservoir pressure at 4000 feet (1219.2 metres) is equal to 2000 psi (13789.52KN/m2), this equates to an overbalance of 288 psi (1985.7KN/m2). This overbalance keeps the well 10 stable and prevents the hydrocarbon being produced into the well 10.
  • Sections of the casing are coupled together as with drill pipe, but they may be welded together, threaded or interlocked, and when the string reaches the required depth it is cemented in position, as shown in Fig.2. With the drill pipe in place an annulus is formed, up which drilling fluid and cuttings may travel to the surface. A deep hole will need several concentric runs of reducing diameter to make up a casing programme.
  • Primary cementing is the first job in a casing cementing programme, which takes place soon after the casing has been run. After the drill string has been removed cement is pumped down the inside of the casing to clear the hole of mud. A cementing plug is then inserted, followed by drilling fluid, which forces the cement to the bottom of the hole and up into the space between casing and hole, or between casings, until it reaches the surface along with any remaining mud. This is known as cementing up. When set, the cement 60 keeps the casing 50 in place and secures the hole against the ingress of unwanted fluids by filling the annular space between the casing and the bore wall. This provides an added barrier to the well over and above the mud column used in the drilling phase. The unperforated cemented casing 50 also retains the reservoir pressure at the reservoir depth. As a prelude to the production phase of operation of the well, the well bore fluid is exchanged from a relatively high density drilling mud to a lower density completion fluid 110 such as a brine containing for example sodium chloride or calcium chloride which has a weight of 10ppg (997.763kg/m3). This is achieved using conventional clean-up techniques employing drill pipe and casing scrapers. The blade type or wire brush scrapers are used as a mechanical means to scrape the internal wall of the casing down to the bottom of the well. This process removes any mud cake, which has built up on the casing well by pumping sea water into the wellbore until the fluid returns have reached the required level of cleanliness. Once the well has been cleaned, the prefiltered completion brine is circulated into the wellbore. By reducing the weight of the fluid in this manner, the hydrostatic head is reduced further as the following calculation illustrates; 0.052 x 10 x 4000 = 2080psi (14341.1kN/m2) hydrostatic The fluid column is still overbalanced by 80psi (551.58kN/m2) at this stage.
  • As shown in Fig. 3, the well 10 is completed by installing a down hole safety valve 70, a packer 80, connection tubulars 90, and a wellhead 100. After completion, the well is still overbalanced by 80psi (551.58kN/m2).
  • After completion of the well has been successfully carried out, the well is in a condition which enables it to be underbalanced with a view to facilitating production. Referring to Fig. 4, it can be seen that the underbalance is achieved by running 600 feet (182.88m) of slip pipe 120 into the completion zone 130. Nitrogen 150 is then pumped under pressure into the well to remove the upper part-volume of the fluid column down to a level 160 at the end of the slim pipe 120. The pump pressure required through the system is a function of how deep the slim pipe 120 is run into the well and the density of the completion fluid 110. The pressure range is a function of the differential pressure at the drilling tool 20 and the rate at which the nitrogen is being pumped The return line 140 for the completion fluid/nitrogen to the surge tank on deck (not shown) is choked back. This ensures that a back pressure is maintained during the nitrogen pumping operation. The system can be operated from a minimum pressure of 50psi (344.74kN/m2) to a maximum operating pressure of 5000psi (34473.8kN/m2). The following calculation shows how the well is underbalanced; 4000 x 10 x 0.052 = 2080psi (14341.1kN/m2) hydrostatic 600 x 10 x 0.052 = 312psi (2151.2kN/m2)    this produces a hydrostatic head of 1776psi (12245.1kN/m2).
    As the reservoir pressure is equal to 2000psi (13789.5kN/m2), this produces an underbalance of 223psi (1537.5kN/m2). The fluid returns 140 removed by the nitrogen 150 can be monitored to ensure the correct underbalance has been achieved. The underbalance can also be verified by the pressure reading.
  • After the well has been cased, cemented and serviced, each productive horizon is completed by making permanent contact between it and the well bore, and installing tubing and the appropriate equipment for controlling fluid flow. Contact with each horizon may be achieved directly or by perforating the casing, as shown in Fig.5, using wireline guns 180. Completions may be single or multiple completions and separate tubings are run according to the number of productive zones. This causes the fluid level 160 to rise, offloading the well in the process.
  • Fig. 6 shows the well in the production phase after a production tree 190 has been fitted.
    The method described eliminates the complex mechanisms and procedures utilised by existing methods. Benefit is gained from the fact that the present invention can be used to underbalance a well extremely quickly and at a far lower cost than can be achieved using existing methods.
  • The example described is given by way of example only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention which is defined by the following claims.

Claims (14)

  1. A method of initiating production of hydrocarbons from a dead or killed well including a shaft with a casing or lining (30) therein; and a flow conduit (40) located within the casing or lining (30); which well has a column of liquid to provide a hydrostatic head, which method is characterised by the steps of:
    inserting a tubular member (130) inside the casing or lining to a required depth in the liquid to provide a chamber (110);
    sealing the chamber (110) from the outside environment;
    causing a gaseous material to flow into the chamber (110) to create a pressure differential between the chamber (110) and the outside environment, and so cause the liquid in the well to be displaced and flow along the flow conduit (40);
    collecting the liquid displaced from the well; and
    perforating the casing (30) to enable the hydrocarbon to flow.
  2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said gaseous material is an inert gas.
  3. The method according to claim 2 wherein said inert gas is nitrogen.
  4. The method according to any of the preceding claims wherein said displaced fluid is an aqueous completion fluid.
  5. The method according to claim 4 wherein said completion fluid is sodium chloride, calcium chloride or brine.
  6. The method according to any of the preceding claims wherein sealing the chamber includes cementing said casing or lining in place filling the annular space between the casing or lining and the bore hole.
  7. The method according to any preceding claim wherein sealing the chamber includes providing a static seal at the top of the well to complete the well.
  8. The use of the method in accordance with any of the preceding claims to initiate production of hydrocarbons from a new well, or a suspended well, or a re-entered well.
  9. The use of the method according to claim 8 with a downhole plug system.
  10. The use of the method according to claim 9 wherein the well has been pre-perforated.
  11. The use of the method according to claim 9 wherein the well uses slotted liners.
  12. Apparatus for use in the initiation of production of hydrocarbon from a dead or killed well having a casing (30) and which well has a hydrostatic head of liquid in the well during drilling which apparatus includes:
    a tubular member (130) for insertion into the well casing (30) to provide a chamber (110) and a flow conduit (40);
    gas supply means (150) to supply gas under pressure to the chamber;
    fluid flow means to allow liquid displaced from the well to flow through the flow conduit (40) and be collected; and characterised in that means for sealing the chamber (110) from the environment are provided and include a static seal for sealing the chamber (110) at the top of the well and further characterised by having means to perforate the casing (30).
  13. Apparatus for use in the initiation of production of hydrocarbon from a well as claimed in claim 12 wherein the means for sealing the chamber at the top of the well is provided by ;
       a tool which includes a body adapted to be removably inserted in a well and having at least two discrete fluid channel therein;
       one of said fluid channels is provided at one end with a fluid tight coupling for attachment to a controllable gas supply;
       one of the other, channels having a fluid tight coupling for venting fluid to a collector; wherein
       said body further includes means for attaching a length of tubing for insertion into the well tubing to provide means of exchanging fluids within the well and to adjust the pressure in the well tubing.
  14. Apparatus as claimed in claim 13 wherein said tubing attachable to said body is provided with a foraminated bull nose distal end.
EP00964443A 1999-10-01 2000-09-29 Underbalanced perforation Expired - Lifetime EP1220972B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GBGB9923200.1A GB9923200D0 (en) 1999-10-01 1999-10-01 Fluid extraction
GB9923200 1999-10-01
PCT/GB2000/003741 WO2001025595A1 (en) 1999-10-01 2000-09-29 Underbalanced perforation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1220972A1 EP1220972A1 (en) 2002-07-10
EP1220972B1 true EP1220972B1 (en) 2003-12-10

Family

ID=10861918

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00964443A Expired - Lifetime EP1220972B1 (en) 1999-10-01 2000-09-29 Underbalanced perforation

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1220972B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE256247T1 (en)
AU (1) AU7537900A (en)
DE (1) DE60007162D1 (en)
DK (1) DK1220972T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9923200D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2001025595A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6598682B2 (en) 2000-03-02 2003-07-29 Schlumberger Technology Corp. Reservoir communication with a wellbore
US6732798B2 (en) 2000-03-02 2004-05-11 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Controlling transient underbalance in a wellbore
US7036594B2 (en) 2000-03-02 2006-05-02 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Controlling a pressure transient in a well
US7284612B2 (en) 2000-03-02 2007-10-23 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Controlling transient pressure conditions in a wellbore
US7290617B2 (en) 2004-01-13 2007-11-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Running a completion assembly without killing a well
US7243725B2 (en) 2004-05-08 2007-07-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Surge chamber assembly and method for perforating in dynamic underbalanced conditions
BRPI0919556B8 (en) 2008-10-03 2019-07-30 Halliburton Energy Services Inc method, system for drilling a well, and, computer readable medium
US9759048B2 (en) 2015-06-29 2017-09-12 Owen Oil Tools Lp Perforating gun for underbalanced perforating
CN106930715B (en) * 2017-05-15 2018-12-14 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Oil-water well self-propelled nitrogen negative pressure returns row's casting and dragging free device and its application method
US11346184B2 (en) 2018-07-31 2022-05-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Delayed drop assembly

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4175042A (en) * 1976-10-26 1979-11-20 Texas Brine Corporation Well completion and work over fluid and method of use
US4650010A (en) * 1984-11-27 1987-03-17 Halliburton Company Borehole devices actuated by fluid pressure
US6065550A (en) * 1996-02-01 2000-05-23 Gardes; Robert Method and system for drilling and completing underbalanced multilateral wells utilizing a dual string technique in a live well
US5635636A (en) * 1996-05-29 1997-06-03 Alexander; Lloyd G. Method of determining inflow rates from underbalanced wells

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1220972A1 (en) 2002-07-10
GB9923200D0 (en) 1999-12-01
WO2001025595A1 (en) 2001-04-12
DK1220972T3 (en) 2004-04-13
ATE256247T1 (en) 2003-12-15
DE60007162D1 (en) 2004-01-22
AU7537900A (en) 2001-05-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7066283B2 (en) Reverse circulation directional and horizontal drilling using concentric coil tubing
US6371207B1 (en) Method and apparatus for displacing drilling fluids with completion and workover fluids, and for cleaning tubular members
US7044230B2 (en) Method for removing a tool from a well
EP2013446B1 (en) Wellbore system
US6412574B1 (en) Method of forming a subsea borehole from a drilling vessel in a body of water of known depth
CA2511249C (en) Method for drilling a lateral wellbore with secondary fluid injection
US9428988B2 (en) Hydrocarbon well and technique for perforating casing toe
EP1220972B1 (en) Underbalanced perforation
US7240733B2 (en) Pressure-actuated perforation with automatic fluid circulation for immediate production and removal of debris
US11767732B2 (en) Systems and methods for plugging a well
US7213648B2 (en) Pressure-actuated perforation with continuous removal of debris
WO2017099764A1 (en) Method of well completion
RU2159317C1 (en) Process of sinking and running of horizontal well
EP0464340A2 (en) Apparatus and method for inserting a pump within a conduit
Norton et al. Auger Well Completions-Sand Control Installation and Mechanical Design
Chappell Waterflooding in deepwater environments
CA2487878C (en) Pressure-actuated perforation with automatic fluid circulation for immediate production and removal of debris
CA2462412C (en) Pressure-actuated perforation with continuous removal of debris

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020501

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20021112

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60007162

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040122

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040310

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040310

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040311

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040321

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20031210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040930

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040913

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040510

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100929

PGRI Patent reinstated in contracting state [announced from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Effective date: 20110616

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20140918

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20140925

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20140916

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20140919

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20140924

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20150930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150929

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20150929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20151001

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150929

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150930