[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1216444A4 - Internet based hearing assessment methods - Google Patents

Internet based hearing assessment methods

Info

Publication number
EP1216444A4
EP1216444A4 EP00982609A EP00982609A EP1216444A4 EP 1216444 A4 EP1216444 A4 EP 1216444A4 EP 00982609 A EP00982609 A EP 00982609A EP 00982609 A EP00982609 A EP 00982609A EP 1216444 A4 EP1216444 A4 EP 1216444A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
test
end station
computer program
input
sound
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00982609A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1216444A2 (en
Inventor
Christoph Menzel
Sunil Puria
Scott R Rader
Vincent Pluvinage
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sound ID Inc
Original Assignee
Sound ID Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US09/407,751 external-priority patent/US7181297B1/en
Application filed by Sound ID Inc filed Critical Sound ID Inc
Publication of EP1216444A2 publication Critical patent/EP1216444A2/en
Publication of EP1216444A4 publication Critical patent/EP1216444A4/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12Audiometering
    • A61B5/121Audiometering evaluating hearing capacity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/60Network streaming of media packets
    • H04L65/75Media network packet handling
    • H04L65/765Media network packet handling intermediate
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/2866Architectures; Arrangements
    • H04L67/30Profiles
    • H04L67/306User profiles
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
    • H04L69/30Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
    • H04L69/32Architecture of open systems interconnection [OSI] 7-layer type protocol stacks, e.g. the interfaces between the data link level and the physical level
    • H04L69/322Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
    • H04L69/329Intralayer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer [OSI layer 7]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/42391Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers where the subscribers are hearing-impaired persons, e.g. telephone devices for the deaf
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R5/00Stereophonic arrangements
    • H04R5/04Circuit arrangements, e.g. for selective connection of amplifier inputs/outputs to loudspeakers, for loudspeaker detection, or for adaptation of settings to personal preferences or hearing impairments
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B2560/00Constructional details of operational features of apparatus; Accessories for medical measuring apparatus
    • A61B2560/02Operational features
    • A61B2560/0242Operational features adapted to measure environmental factors, e.g. temperature, pollution
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2205/00Details of stereophonic arrangements covered by H04R5/00 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2205/041Adaptation of stereophonic signal reproduction for the hearing impaired
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2225/00Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2225/55Communication between hearing aids and external devices via a network for data exchange
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting

Definitions

  • the present invention relates the field of audiology, and more particularly to techniques for producing data indicating an assessment of an individual's hearing profile facilitated by the use of the Internet or other communication network technology.
  • Assessing an individual's hearing profile is important in a variety of contexts. For example, individuals with hearing profiles that are outside of a normal range, must have their profile recorded for the purposes of prescribing hearing aids which fit the individual profile. Typically hearing profile assessments are made by professional audiologists using calibrated and specialized equipment. Therefore, hearing profile assessments are relatively difficult to obtain and expensive. Because of the difficulty in obtaining a hearing assessment test, and for a variety of other reasons, many persons who could benefit from devices that would assist their hearing do not follow through with obtaining a prescription for such devices. Thus, it is desirable to simplify the procedures involved in obtaining a reliable hearing assessment.
  • United States Patent No. 5,928,160 describes a home hearing test system and method based on the use of calibrated headphones specially manufactured to support the hearing test using home audio equipment.
  • home hearing assessment tests have not achieved commercial acceptance.
  • Professional audiologists are typically required because of the large number of factors involved in making an assessment necessary for generating a reliable hearing profile.
  • An audiologist is able to set up a controlled environment, and conduct the test according to a testing protocol involving a number of stimuli and response steps that is adapted based on the responses gathered during the test.
  • hearing profiles other than for the purposes of prescribing hearing aids and assistive listening devices, is being developed.
  • hearing profiles of individuals can be utilized for producing customized audio products, such as pre-recorded music that has been modified according to the hearing profile of the listener.
  • One medium for delivering customized audio products is the Internet. See, commonly owned and copending U.S.
  • the Internet gains popularity, and more individuals obtain the general-purpose processing power of personal computers coupled to the Internet and having sound cards or other audio processing capability, the Internet is becoming a more important medium for the delivery of audio products. Accordingly, it is desirable to leverage the communication technology the Internet used in the delivery of audio products for the purposes of performing hearing assessments in the home.
  • the present invention provides methods and systems for conducting a hearing assessment test that can be administered via the Internet using consumer quality multimedia components. Many ways to implement such a test are described. Aspects and advantages of the present invention include:
  • test protocol The expertise associated with following a test protocol is delivered to consumer via the internet.
  • the test protocol may be structured like a standard audiometric test or it may make full use of the mutli-media capabilities of the computer, or other processor, and embed the protocol within an audiovisual experience (e.g. game, task set).
  • an audiovisual experience e.g. game, task set
  • a computer sound card or other audio processor as found in home computers coupled to the internet, is used for sound generation and for sound measurements.
  • the test protocol may be used for assessing hearing loss across audible frequency range or any subset of the audible range.
  • test is initiated by a user, and run at the user's internet connected computer, hand held device or cell phone. However, the expert administration of the test needed to ensure valid results are imbedded in the test software delivered via the internet.
  • the present invention provides a method for conducting a hearing test using a computer program that comprises establishing a communication channel between an end station and a server in the communication network, such as the Internet.
  • the method involves executing a first portion of the computer program at the server and a second portion of the computer program at the end station.
  • the allocation of processing logic between the first portion of the computer program executed the server, and a second portion of the computer program executed at the end station is made according to particular implementations of the computer program, such that for example the first portion of the computer program includes logic for managing control of the test, and a second portion of the computer program includes logic for generating stimuli during the test, and accepting input data from the user during the test.
  • the computer program used for executing the test includes a component to deliver the second portion of the computer program to the end station from a resource coupled to the communication network, such from the server itself, or from a database accessible via the communication network.
  • the second component executed at the end station may include any combination of the logic to control the test, to process the data gathered in the test, and to produce the sound signals used in the test.
  • the computer program in various aspects of the invention produces audio stimuli during the test, except input data from a user according to a testing protocol.
  • environmental data is sensed at the user's end station during the test, for use in assessing background noise or other control factors processed in combination with the input data to produce a hearing assessment.
  • the process includes calibrating the sound card or other sound processing resources on the end station.
  • test types there are a number of different test types that can be used within an Internet based hearing loss assessment utilizing first and second portions of a computer program as described above. The different types are dependent on the type of data.
  • suitable test types includes:
  • LGOB Octave Bands
  • the component of the test program which is executed at the end station includes a graphical user interface which supports a multimedia presentation of the test.
  • the constructs used on the graphical user interface for prompting input data from a user during the test depend on the particular test protocol being executed.
  • the character of the graphical user interface in various embodiments approximates a game or other task set organization.
  • the present invention is applied on end stations capable of internet communications, and including audio capability, including home computers, laptop computers, hand held or palm sized computers, internet-enabled mobile phones, and the like.
  • the computer program used for executing the hearing test includes logic that manages a calibration routine for the sound card or other audio resources coupled to the end station of the user, and used for producing the audio stimuli in the test.
  • the computer program used for executing the hearing test includes logic that accounts for background noise, attributes of the audio resources coupled to the end station of the user, or other environmental factors detected during the test.
  • a calibration device is provided that is suitable for use in electronic calibration of sound cards on end stations for supporting the test program of the present invention.
  • the calibration device may also be used for other purposes requiring calibrated audio signal generation from sound cards having variant architectures.
  • the calibration device includes a test signal source and a switch.
  • the switch is operated in one embodiment in response to DTMF or other format control signals produced by the sound card to be tested.
  • the switch is operated so that test signal source is used to determine one of the input and output transfer functions of the sound card under test, and the other of the transfer functions is determined using feed back.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates an Internet based system for conducting a hearing assessment test according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the method of operation for an Internet based test according to present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement inferred from drive voltage for use according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO.
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement completed at the ear using a calibration source box and a calibrated microphone.
  • Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement completed at the ear using a VCO mapping function.
  • Fig. 7 is a block diagram of a test configuration for relative sound pressure level measurement.
  • Fig. 8 is a graph showing average audiometric data by age group, representing typical audiograms which may be produced using the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the Internet based system of the present invention implementing a hearing assessment test.
  • System includes a hearing test server 10 coupled to a communication network 11, such as the Internet.
  • a user end station 12, such as a personal computer, is also coupled to the communication network 1 1.
  • the end station 12 includes a soundcard 13 which provides data processing resources for producing audio output and receiving audio input under control of the logic in computer programs executed by the processor in the end station 12.
  • the sound card 13 is connected to stereo speakers 14 and 15, or more preferably to a headphone, and to a microphone 16.
  • the end station 12 also includes a display 19, a keyboard 17, and a mouse 18.
  • audio stimuli in the form of sound signals produced in the soundcard 13 are generated using the stereo speakers 14 and 15.
  • the sound signals may be sampled or computed sound.
  • Environmental factors such as background noise, and the level of the output of the speakers 14 and 15 is sensed using a microphone 16.
  • the display 19 is used to display a graphical user interface which prompts a user to input data using the keyboard 17 or the mouse 18 in response to the audio stimuli of the test.
  • Headphones used in the preferred embodiment include a microphone inside used for calibration and sensing of the environment during the test. Also, the headphones include seating arrangement to filter noise from the background.
  • the hearing test is executed using a computer program that includes a first component stored on the server test program memory 20 which is connected to the server 10, and a second component which is stored in the PC test program memory 21 which is connected to the end station 12.
  • a hearing profile is produced for the user.
  • this hearing profile is stored in a hearing profile database 22 which is accessible using Internet 11.
  • the hearing profile database 22 is coupled directly to the server 10.
  • the hearing profile might be stored only on users end station and not made available to the communication network.
  • the end station 12 consists of a personal computer with standard soundcard components.
  • additional components may be added, including a microphone preamplifier to increase microphone output signal levels, a soundcard output accumulator for managing the output levels for the audio stimuli, and headphones with or without built-in microphones.
  • the hearing test server 10 maintains a web site.
  • a user at the end station 12 accesses the web site and downloads a component of the hearing test computer program from the server 10 for execution at the end station 12.
  • the user initiates the test without intervention by a third party, and uses the resources available via the Internet and the resources at the end station to conduct a hearing test.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates the basic flowchart for the process of performing an Internet based hearing assessment test.
  • a user establishes a link between the end station and a hearing test server via a communication network such as the Internet.
  • the link comprises a connection according to the transmission control protocol executing over the
  • the link may also involve protocols like the hypertext throughput protocol HTTP, and other Internet protocols.
  • test control resources and data processing resources that will be utilized during the test are allocated.
  • the allocation of these resources can take a variety of configurations, including maintaining all of the resources at the server, and providing an Internet based interface accessible using a browser or email client at the end station, maintaining the test control resources at the Internet server, and data processing resources at the end station, or other combinations as suits the particular implementation of the program to control the test and to process the data generated during the test.
  • test sound signal resources are allocated.
  • the sound signal resources may include sound samples, programs for generating sounds, or other common sound synthesis tools.
  • the sound signal resources are adapted to the particular type of hearing test to be executed.
  • the sound signal resources are downloaded to the end station from the server.
  • the sound signal resources are available in the personal computer soundcard without requiring download from the server, such as by providing recorded audio files with drivers for sound cards that are loaded on a user's end station.
  • sound signal resources are distributed between the end station and a server during execution of the test.
  • calibration programs are executed to evaluate the test environment (the audio environment in which the end station is situated), and the test set up (the audio characteristics of the equipment at the end station (step 53).
  • test control resources and sound signal resources necessary for supporting the test Upon completion of the allocation of data processing resources and calibration, test control resources and sound signal resources necessary for supporting the test, the test is initiated.
  • the first step in the test is to generate a sound using the sound signal resource (block 54).
  • the process accepts and processes input using the test control and test data processing resources (block 55).
  • the routine determines whether the test has been completed (block 56). If the test is not completed, then the algorithm determines a next sound according to a test protocol being executed using the test control resources, in response to the input from the user and the state of the test in one implementation (block 57). Then, the process loops back to step 54 to generate the next sound. If at block 56, it is determined at the test is completed, then the hearing profile is stored (block 58).
  • a second option for accepting input includes causing the user to complete in action prompted by the graphical user interface when test generated sounds meet some criterion.
  • the test sound may be a sound varying in loudness. The test subject enters a mouse click when the sound disappears.
  • the test control resources can be distributed between the server and the end station using an Internet link, or using an executable file downloaded from the server and run locally on the test subjects equipment, or any partitioning of control in between.
  • the program can provide expertise for measuring and evaluating the level of background noise, testing for false positives and false negatives, and in general control the flow and pace of the test process according to a test protocol. Controlling the test flow has specific advantages toward maintaining test subject interest as the user can be prompted to provide appropriate feedback and responses.
  • data collected during the test can be returned to the web site server as raw data, as completely analyzed result data such as a hearing profile, or as any combination of raw and processed data in between.
  • data is not returned web site server in all, but rather completely processed locally on the end station using resources downloaded partially or completely from the test server.
  • the sound signals used in the testing process are implement in several alternative forms.
  • the type of test signals used can have significant influence on the results of the test through a number of psychoacoustic effects. A large number of possible test signals are applicable to any of the implementations. Examples of the types of test tones claimed are: • Pure tones of long duration and constant intensity in each test step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies. Pulses of pure tones and constant intensity in each step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies.
  • Speech sound with and without noise background with or without temporal compression or elongation Speech sound with and without noise background with or without temporal compression or elongation.
  • test sound signal generation is not limited, and can include sampling using standard formats like MIDI, FM synthesis, wavetable synthesis or other sound generation techniques.
  • Example test type include:
  • the hearing threshold level test is related to identifying the sound level when the test subject can just begin to hear the test signal. This test type may be associated with determining that actual sound pressure level SPL of thresholds across the frequency range or the test method be simply to establish the relative level of thresholds as a function of frequency.
  • the masking threshold level identifies the test signal sound level when the test signal can be heard out of a masking signal.
  • the masking threshold test protocol can be completed at a number of different baseline amplitudes to give an indication of recruitment. This method may have some advantages when there is some background noise at frequencies other than the test frequency.
  • the generated sound consists of two different frequencies.
  • One frequency is considered a baseline and is constant throughout a test.
  • the other sound, the test sound has a variable frequency during the test.
  • a measurement consists of determining the loudness of the test sound that matches loudness of the baseline sound as a function of frequency.
  • the resulting measurements are used to generate an equal loudness curve.
  • the difference between the equal loudness curve obtained here and the equal loudness curve for normal hearing populations gives the hearing loss assessment.
  • This test protocol can be completed at a number of different baseline amplitudes to give an indication of recruitment.
  • Loudness Growth in Octave Bands is a subjective loudness evaluation procedure in which the test subject a prescribed set of common adjectives (e.g.very quiet, quiet, comfortable, loud, very loud and uncomfortably loud) to "measure” the loudness of test signals.
  • the difference between the perceived loudness reported by the subject and a population of normally hearing individuals gives a measure of recruitment.
  • Speech Reception Threshold and Speech Discrimination in Noise or Quiet are based on the fact that different speech sounds have different frequency spectra and so the speech reception/discrimination capabilities of a subject are dependent on the subject hearing profile. Furthermore, noise can be used to test the breadth of the auditory filter. Test with background noise are particularly interesting for internet administered test because the controlled noise level can be set to mask the environmental noise.
  • Temporal compression of speech signals or tones can be used to probe auditory capabilities since it is known that temporal masking is affected by sensineural hearing impairment.
  • test methods outlined above could be implemented in either a monaural or a binaural configuration.
  • each ear is tested individually and the other ear is "plugged" or otherwise deprived of test signal input.
  • the supplied headphones may have only one speaker.
  • test methods outlined above can be implemented within a number of different test configurations.
  • the different test configurations may have different peripheral equipment, test protocols and they may have different levels of accuracy.
  • Four general test configurations are based on the four possible independent combinations of the use of one of actual sound pressure level SPLa measurement and relative sound pressure level SPLr measurement, and the use of one of sensing of SPLa or SPLr at the ear and inferring
  • SPLa or SPLr from drive voltages.
  • Actual SPL measurement methods measure the actual sound pressure level SPLa that coincides with the test criterion. As such, these measurements require measurement of a quantity that can be related to sound pressure level.
  • the SPLa can be inferred from drive voltages, rather than from audio sensors like microphones.
  • This general method refers to the approach of using a direct measurement of the sound sources drive voltage and knowledge of the sound source's voltage-to-sound transfer function to estimate the SPL delivered during the test. Since the actual sound pressure level delivered to the ear from a given source depends greatly on the relative geometry of the source and the ear, this test method is probably requires that earphones generate the sound.
  • a calibration source box is used in conjunction with calibrated earphones for measurement of SPLa based on inference from drive voltages.
  • the test configuration shown in Fig. 3 includes the test server implemented as a WebSite 100.
  • a communication link 101 is established between the WebSite 100 and the remote computer 102 acting as an end station for the test.
  • Test control commands and information input and output are provided across the link 101 between the WebSite 100 and remote computer 102.
  • the remote computer 102 includes input control 103 for accepting test subject input and a sound card 104 for producing audio stimuli and accepting audio input from sensors.
  • a calibration source box 105 is coupled to the sound card 104.
  • the source box includes a first switch 106 and a second switch 107.
  • One output of the calibration source box 105 is calibrated headphones 106 for use by the test subject.
  • the calibration source box 105 is used to determine the specific input and output transfer functions of the sound card input A/D and output D/A conversions. Once the input A/D and output D/A calibrations are known, it is possible to accurately know the output drive signal. Combining this calibration knowledge with the known headphone calibration, the absolute sound pressure level can be estimated.
  • the calibration source box 105 is a three port box containing two switches 106, 107 and three switch contacts A, B, C. It may be configured with its own power source through either a battery connection or through a wall plug.
  • the calibration and test process is as follows:
  • a simulated earphone load may need to be attached to connection point B during step 2 of the test to ensure that the output impedance seen by the sound card during calibration is the same as the load seen during the test. If this extra load is needed, then another switch and terminal will be needed.
  • the measured sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies allows the calculation of hearing loss.
  • the measured sound pressure levels are the sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according to the test type.
  • the Signal Source is used to input a known signal into the input port of the soundcard. Measurement of the resulting digital word gives the input voltage-to-digital transfer function. This measurement is completed with the soundcard's microphone input gain set at -1/4 of its full range. Utilizing the pressure-to-voltage transfer function of the calibrated microphone allows the pressure-to-digital transfer function of the microphone/pre-amp/sound card input path to be fully defined.
  • the second step addresses the fact that the voltage in-to-digital conversion of sound cards is not linear over the entire range of microphone gain. Furthermore, it is known that SNR is improved if the microphone gain is maximized. Cal 2 gathers the information needed to determine what input/output gain and digital word to use to optimize signal integrity and test flow speed. To complete this characterization, the sound card input is driven with a number of different soundcard output levels at number of different microphone gain levels. The combined information gathered in Cal 1 and Cal 2 completely calibrates the microphone/microphone input portion of the system.
  • the third calibration step (Cal 3) is used to generate the Sound card output word to ear level sound pressure transfer function. This transfer function is determined by driving the headphones with a soundcard digital word and measuring the pressure with the previously calibrated microphone/microphone input.
  • an active audio channel during the test delivers sound to one ear, while the other audio channel is used to deliver control signals to the calibration box, for controlling the switches for example.
  • One suitable control signal format is the DTMF tone standard used in telephone systems.
  • Fig. 4 shows a configuration suitable for SPLa measurements using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO based method.
  • the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again.
  • the calibration source box 105 of Fig. 3 is replaced by VCO 110 which receives an input voltage on line 111 and produces and output on line 112 based upon the signals being transmitted to calibrated headphones on line 113.
  • This method assumes that the sound card input port's frequency-to-frequency transfer function is one. Using this assumption, the VCO 110 is used to map the calibrated headphone drive voltage amplitude into frequency space. The drive voltage is determined through frequency space analysis of the VCO output combined with known headphone calibration.
  • the test subject signals when the test criteria is met.
  • the corresponding SPL can be determined.
  • the measured sound pressure levels at the various test frequencies give the hearing loss assessment.
  • Actual sound pressure level SPLa may also be sensed at the ear using configurations like those shown in Figs. 5 and 6.
  • This general method uses direct measurement of the sound pressure level at the ear.
  • a calibrated microphone is used to measure the sound pressure level during the test and during the calibration program.
  • a calibration source box 120 is used in conjunction with a calibrated microphone 121.
  • the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again.
  • the calibration source 120 is used to determine the specific transfer functions of the sound card input A/D conversion. Combining this calibration knowledge with the known headphone calibration, the sound pressure level can be determined.
  • the calibration source box 120 is a five port box containing three switches 122, 123, 124 and three switch contacts A, B, C. It may be configured with its own power source through either a battery connection or through a wall plug. The calibration and test process are shown in the following table.
  • the measured sound pressure levels are the sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according the test type.
  • Fig. 6 shows a configuration suitable for SPLa measurements at the ear using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO based method.
  • the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again.
  • the calibration source box 1120 of Fig. 5 is replaced by VCO 150 which receives an input voltage on line 151 and produces an output on line 152 based upon the signals received on line 153 from transducers 155.
  • the transducers 155 comprise headphones or speakers coupled to the sound card 104 by line 156.
  • the headphones embodiment includes an embedded microphone, and the speaker embodiment includes a stand alone microphone.
  • This method assumes that the sound card input port's frequency-to-frequency transfer function is one. Using this assumption, a VCO is used to map the calibrated microphone output voltage into frequency space. The microphone output is determined through frequency space analysis of the VCO output combined with the known microphone calibration.
  • test subject signals when the test criteria is met.
  • the test criteria is met.
  • the known VCO mapping function and the known microphone calibration can be determined. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according the test type.
  • Relative measurement of sound pressure levels may also be used for some embodiments, as mentioned above.
  • the SPL corresponding to a test criteria may not be as important as knowledge of the relative threshold of hearing across the audible frequency range.
  • the following section outlines relative SPL level tests.
  • Each method described could be implemented with either headphones or speakers. These test methods assume that sound card's input A/D and its output D/A converters are linear across frequency and amplitude. Furthermore, the transfer functions of any headphones, microphones or speakers used in the test are also assumed to be substantially linear across frequency and amplitude. These test methods may include input pre-amps and output attenuators. In general, the test set-ups and protocols are simpler in a relative measurement. All the test methods discussed below can use the test set-up shown in Fig. 7.
  • the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again.
  • the sound card output on line 161 is supplied to a transducer/sensor 160 comprising for examples, headphones with an embedded microphone or speakers with a stand alone microphone.
  • the microphone output is supplied on line 162 to the sound card 104.
  • Relative SPL measurement inferred from drive voltage is the simplest test method.
  • the test proceeds by playing the test sounds either through the speakers or through headphones.
  • the test subject signals when the test criterion is met.
  • the measured data is the sound card's digital word is the output.
  • a method based on relative SPL measurement completed at ear requires that a microphone be used to measure the actual sound pressure level at the ear.
  • the test configuration is shown in Fig. 7 as well.
  • the measured data is the sound card's input digital word.
  • the goal of the Home Audio Test is to provide information related to the auditory capability of the subject to evaluate the subject's suitability for personalized audio. The test does not need to return any specific information about the hearing loss of the subject.
  • an audiogram will not provide enough information to ensure a good fit in all cases. Hence, iterations will be needed to find the correct fit.
  • the goal of the test is to provide sufficient information to ensure that the first clip of reprocessed audio shows some benefit to the subject.
  • the first reprocessed audio can not lead to displeasing sound quality.
  • One core of the audio reprocessing algorithm involves developing corrections for recruitment. As a result, the benefits of the algorithm will be most observed by subject with predominately semi-neural hearing loss.
  • the hearing loss between 125hz and 500hz is constant and equal to the value given for 500hz from the equation given above.
  • the assumed shape for audiograms is shown in Fig. 8.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Reverberation, Karaoke And Other Acoustics (AREA)
  • Signal Processing For Digital Recording And Reproducing (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)

Abstract

Methods for conducting a hearing assessment test that can be administered via the Internet using consurmer quality multimedia components are provided. The method for conducting a hearing test uses a computer program that comprises establishing a communication channel between an end station (12) and a server (10) in the communication network (11), such as the Internet. The method involves executing a first portion of the computer program at the server (10) and a second portion at the end station (12). The allocation of processing logic between the first and second portions is made according to particular implementation of the computer program, for example, the first portion includes logic for managing control of the test, and a second portion includes logic for generating stimuli and accepting input from the user during the test. Techniques for calibrating a sound card, such as on ahome computer in support of the hearing test are included.

Description

INTERNET BASED HEARING ASSESSMENT METHODS
Inventors: Christoph Menzel Sunil Puria R. Scott Rader Vincent Pluvinage
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention
The present invention relates the field of audiology, and more particularly to techniques for producing data indicating an assessment of an individual's hearing profile facilitated by the use of the Internet or other communication network technology.
Description of Related Art
Assessing an individual's hearing profile is important in a variety of contexts. For example, individuals with hearing profiles that are outside of a normal range, must have their profile recorded for the purposes of prescribing hearing aids which fit the individual profile. Typically hearing profile assessments are made by professional audiologists using calibrated and specialized equipment. Therefore, hearing profile assessments are relatively difficult to obtain and expensive. Because of the difficulty in obtaining a hearing assessment test, and for a variety of other reasons, many persons who could benefit from devices that would assist their hearing do not follow through with obtaining a prescription for such devices. Thus, it is desirable to simplify the procedures involved in obtaining a reliable hearing assessment.
United States Patent No. 5,928,160 describes a home hearing test system and method based on the use of calibrated headphones specially manufactured to support the hearing test using home audio equipment. In addition, reference is made to this patent for its discussion of background concerning hearing assessment tests in general. However, home hearing assessment tests have not achieved commercial acceptance. Professional audiologists are typically required because of the large number of factors involved in making an assessment necessary for generating a reliable hearing profile. An audiologist is able to set up a controlled environment, and conduct the test according to a testing protocol involving a number of stimuli and response steps that is adapted based on the responses gathered during the test.
A variety of uses for hearing profiles, other than for the purposes of prescribing hearing aids and assistive listening devices, is being developed. For example, hearing profiles of individuals can be utilized for producing customized audio products, such as pre-recorded music that has been modified according to the hearing profile of the listener. One medium for delivering customized audio products is the Internet. See, commonly owned and copending U.S. Patent Application No.: 09/464,036, filed 15 December 1999, by Pluvinage, et al., entitled "System and Method for Producing and Storing Hearing Profiles and Customized Audio Data Based on Such Hearing Profiles." As the Internet gains popularity, and more individuals obtain the general-purpose processing power of personal computers coupled to the Internet and having sound cards or other audio processing capability, the Internet is becoming a more important medium for the delivery of audio products. Accordingly, it is desirable to leverage the communication technology the Internet used in the delivery of audio products for the purposes of performing hearing assessments in the home.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides methods and systems for conducting a hearing assessment test that can be administered via the Internet using consumer quality multimedia components. Many ways to implement such a test are described. Aspects and advantages of the present invention include:
1) The expertise associated with following a test protocol is delivered to consumer via the internet.
2) The control functions used for following a test protocol implemented by internet based program.
3) The test protocol may be structured like a standard audiometric test or it may make full use of the mutli-media capabilities of the computer, or other processor, and embed the protocol within an audiovisual experience (e.g. game, task set).
4) A computer sound card or other audio processor, as found in home computers coupled to the internet, is used for sound generation and for sound measurements. 5) The test protocol may be used for assessing hearing loss across audible frequency range or any subset of the audible range.
6) The test is initiated by a user, and run at the user's internet connected computer, hand held device or cell phone. However, the expert administration of the test needed to ensure valid results are imbedded in the test software delivered via the internet.
The present invention provides a method for conducting a hearing test using a computer program that comprises establishing a communication channel between an end station and a server in the communication network, such as the Internet. The method involves executing a first portion of the computer program at the server and a second portion of the computer program at the end station. The allocation of processing logic between the first portion of the computer program executed the server, and a second portion of the computer program executed at the end station is made according to particular implementations of the computer program, such that for example the first portion of the computer program includes logic for managing control of the test, and a second portion of the computer program includes logic for generating stimuli during the test, and accepting input data from the user during the test. Processing of the input data is executed either locally on the user's computer, at the server, or in both places. In one aspect of the invention, the computer program used for executing the test includes a component to deliver the second portion of the computer program to the end station from a resource coupled to the communication network, such from the server itself, or from a database accessible via the communication network. In this case the second component executed at the end station may include any combination of the logic to control the test, to process the data gathered in the test, and to produce the sound signals used in the test. The computer program in various aspects of the invention produces audio stimuli during the test, except input data from a user according to a testing protocol. In addition, environmental data is sensed at the user's end station during the test, for use in assessing background noise or other control factors processed in combination with the input data to produce a hearing assessment. In one embodiment, the process includes calibrating the sound card or other sound processing resources on the end station.
There are a number of different test types that can be used within an Internet based hearing loss assessment utilizing first and second portions of a computer program as described above. The different types are dependent on the type of data. A variety of suitable test types includes:
Hearing threshold level Masking threshold level
Loudness matching
Loudness Growth in Octave Bands (LGOB)
Speech Reception Threshold and Speech Discrimination in noise or quiet
Temporal Compression/Expansion/Masking According to one aspect of the invention, the component of the test program which is executed at the end station includes a graphical user interface which supports a multimedia presentation of the test. The constructs used on the graphical user interface for prompting input data from a user during the test depend on the particular test protocol being executed. The character of the graphical user interface in various embodiments approximates a game or other task set organization.
The present invention is applied on end stations capable of internet communications, and including audio capability, including home computers, laptop computers, hand held or palm sized computers, internet-enabled mobile phones, and the like.
According to yet another aspect of the invention, the computer program used for executing the hearing test includes logic that manages a calibration routine for the sound card or other audio resources coupled to the end station of the user, and used for producing the audio stimuli in the test. Alternatively, or in addition, the computer program used for executing the hearing test includes logic that accounts for background noise, attributes of the audio resources coupled to the end station of the user, or other environmental factors detected during the test. According to another aspect of the invention a calibration device is provided that is suitable for use in electronic calibration of sound cards on end stations for supporting the test program of the present invention. The calibration device may also be used for other purposes requiring calibrated audio signal generation from sound cards having variant architectures. The calibration device includes a test signal source and a switch. The switch is operated in one embodiment in response to DTMF or other format control signals produced by the sound card to be tested. The switch is operated so that test signal source is used to determine one of the input and output transfer functions of the sound card under test, and the other of the transfer functions is determined using feed back.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention can be seen upon review the figures, the detailed description and claims which follow.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING Fig. 1 illustrates an Internet based system for conducting a hearing assessment test according to the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart illustrating the method of operation for an Internet based test according to present invention.
Fig. 3 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement inferred from drive voltage for use according to the present invention.
Fig. 4 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO. Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement completed at the ear using a calibration source box and a calibrated microphone.
Fig. 6 is a block diagram of a test configuration for actual sound pressure level measurement completed at the ear using a VCO mapping function.
Fig. 7 is a block diagram of a test configuration for relative sound pressure level measurement.
Fig. 8 is a graph showing average audiometric data by age group, representing typical audiograms which may be produced using the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION A detailed description of preferred embodiments of the present invention is provided with respect to Fig. 1 through Fig. 8, in which Figs.l and 2 provide illustrate a system and method for Internet based hearing assessment tests. Figs. 3 through 8 provide description of various testing configurations at user end stations suitable for use with present invention. Fig. 1 illustrates the Internet based system of the present invention implementing a hearing assessment test. System includes a hearing test server 10 coupled to a communication network 11, such as the Internet. A user end station 12, such as a personal computer, is also coupled to the communication network 1 1. The end station 12 includes a soundcard 13 which provides data processing resources for producing audio output and receiving audio input under control of the logic in computer programs executed by the processor in the end station 12. In the figure, the sound card 13 is connected to stereo speakers 14 and 15, or more preferably to a headphone, and to a microphone 16. The end station 12 also includes a display 19, a keyboard 17, and a mouse 18. During the test, audio stimuli in the form of sound signals produced in the soundcard 13 are generated using the stereo speakers 14 and 15. The sound signals may be sampled or computed sound. Environmental factors such as background noise, and the level of the output of the speakers 14 and 15 is sensed using a microphone 16. The display 19 is used to display a graphical user interface which prompts a user to input data using the keyboard 17 or the mouse 18 in response to the audio stimuli of the test.
Headphones used in the preferred embodiment include a microphone inside used for calibration and sensing of the environment during the test. Also, the headphones include seating arrangement to filter noise from the background. The hearing test is executed using a computer program that includes a first component stored on the server test program memory 20 which is connected to the server 10, and a second component which is stored in the PC test program memory 21 which is connected to the end station 12. Upon completion of a test, a hearing profile is produced for the user. In a preferred system, this hearing profile is stored in a hearing profile database 22 which is accessible using Internet 11. In another embodiment, the hearing profile database 22 is coupled directly to the server 10. Alternatively, the hearing profile might be stored only on users end station and not made available to the communication network.
In this example, the end station 12 consists of a personal computer with standard soundcard components. In various embodiments, additional components may be added, including a microphone preamplifier to increase microphone output signal levels, a soundcard output accumulator for managing the output levels for the audio stimuli, and headphones with or without built-in microphones.
In one implementation, the hearing test server 10 maintains a web site. To initiate a hearing test, a user at the end station 12 accesses the web site and downloads a component of the hearing test computer program from the server 10 for execution at the end station 12. The user initiates the test without intervention by a third party, and uses the resources available via the Internet and the resources at the end station to conduct a hearing test.
Fig. 2 illustrates the basic flowchart for the process of performing an Internet based hearing assessment test. In a first step 50, a user establishes a link between the end station and a hearing test server via a communication network such as the Internet. In one example, the link comprises a connection according to the transmission control protocol executing over the
Internet protocol TCP/IP. The link may also involve protocols like the hypertext throughput protocol HTTP, and other Internet protocols.
In a next step 51 , test control resources and data processing resources that will be utilized during the test are allocated. The allocation of these resources can take a variety of configurations, including maintaining all of the resources at the server, and providing an Internet based interface accessible using a browser or email client at the end station, maintaining the test control resources at the Internet server, and data processing resources at the end station, or other combinations as suits the particular implementation of the program to control the test and to process the data generated during the test. In step 52, test sound signal resources are allocated. The sound signal resources may include sound samples, programs for generating sounds, or other common sound synthesis tools.
The sound signal resources are adapted to the particular type of hearing test to be executed. In one embodiment, the sound signal resources are downloaded to the end station from the server.
In another embodiment, the sound signal resources are available in the personal computer soundcard without requiring download from the server, such as by providing recorded audio files with drivers for sound cards that are loaded on a user's end station. In another embodiment, sound signal resources are distributed between the end station and a server during execution of the test.
Next, calibration programs are executed to evaluate the test environment (the audio environment in which the end station is situated), and the test set up (the audio characteristics of the equipment at the end station (step 53).
Upon completion of the allocation of data processing resources and calibration, test control resources and sound signal resources necessary for supporting the test, the test is initiated. The first step in the test is to generate a sound using the sound signal resource (block 54). Next, the process accepts and processes input using the test control and test data processing resources (block 55). Next the routine determines whether the test has been completed (block 56). If the test is not completed, then the algorithm determines a next sound according to a test protocol being executed using the test control resources, in response to the input from the user and the state of the test in one implementation (block 57). Then, the process loops back to step 54 to generate the next sound. If at block 56, it is determined at the test is completed, then the hearing profile is stored (block 58).
There are numerous options for prompting feedback from a test subjects. Options include accepting input in the form of the keystroke, a mouse click, use of a selection button or a timeout interval as volume is adjusted by the test control resources, or by the test subject action of increasing the volume, until some criterion is reached. A second option for accepting input includes causing the user to complete in action prompted by the graphical user interface when test generated sounds meet some criterion. For example, the test sound may be a sound varying in loudness. The test subject enters a mouse click when the sound disappears.
The test control resources can be distributed between the server and the end station using an Internet link, or using an executable file downloaded from the server and run locally on the test subjects equipment, or any partitioning of control in between. By controlling the test flow, the program can provide expertise for measuring and evaluating the level of background noise, testing for false positives and false negatives, and in general control the flow and pace of the test process according to a test protocol. Controlling the test flow has specific advantages toward maintaining test subject interest as the user can be prompted to provide appropriate feedback and responses.
In other embodiments, data collected during the test can be returned to the web site server as raw data, as completely analyzed result data such as a hearing profile, or as any combination of raw and processed data in between. In one embodiment, data is not returned web site server in all, but rather completely processed locally on the end station using resources downloaded partially or completely from the test server.
The sound signals used in the testing process are implement in several alternative forms. The type of test signals used can have significant influence on the results of the test through a number of psychoacoustic effects. A large number of possible test signals are applicable to any of the implementations. Examples of the types of test tones claimed are: Pure tones of long duration and constant intensity in each test step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies. Pulses of pure tones and constant intensity in each step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies.
Combination of tones of long duration and varying intensity in each test step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies. • Pulses of combinations of tones and varying intensity in each step utilizing a number of different test steps at different frequencies.
Constant amplitude, swept frequency sound in each test step utilizing different test steps at different amplitudes.
Constant amplitude pulses of swept frequency sound in each test step utilizing different test steps at different amplitudes.
Bandpass filtered noise combined with test signals.
Speech sound with and without noise background with or without temporal compression or elongation.
Furthermore the method of test sound signal generation is not limited, and can include sampling using standard formats like MIDI, FM synthesis, wavetable synthesis or other sound generation techniques.
As mentioned before, a wide variety of hearing test protocols can be utilized for producing a hearing assessment. The particular test chosen depends on a variety of factors, including the use to which the hearing profile will be put, the type of equipment used at the end station, and any information about the physiology of the test subject which may affect the choice of hearing test. Example test type include:
1) Hearing threshold level.
The hearing threshold level test is related to identifying the sound level when the test subject can just begin to hear the test signal. This test type may be associated with determining that actual sound pressure level SPL of thresholds across the frequency range or the test method be simply to establish the relative level of thresholds as a function of frequency.
2) Masking threshold level.
The masking threshold level identifies the test signal sound level when the test signal can be heard out of a masking signal. The masking threshold test protocol can be completed at a number of different baseline amplitudes to give an indication of recruitment. This method may have some advantages when there is some background noise at frequencies other than the test frequency.
3) Loudness matching.
In a loudness matching method, the generated sound consists of two different frequencies. One frequency is considered a baseline and is constant throughout a test. The other sound, the test sound, has a variable frequency during the test. A measurement consists of determining the loudness of the test sound that matches loudness of the baseline sound as a function of frequency. The resulting measurements are used to generate an equal loudness curve. The difference between the equal loudness curve obtained here and the equal loudness curve for normal hearing populations gives the hearing loss assessment. This test protocol can be completed at a number of different baseline amplitudes to give an indication of recruitment.
4) Loudness Growth in Octave Bands (LGOB).
Loudness Growth in Octave Bands is a subjective loudness evaluation procedure in which the test subject a prescribed set of common adjectives (e.g.very quiet, quiet, comfortable, loud, very loud and uncomfortably loud) to "measure" the loudness of test signals. The difference between the perceived loudness reported by the subject and a population of normally hearing individuals gives a measure of recruitment.
5) Speech Reception Threshold and Speech Discrimination in Noise or Quiet. These test methods are based on the fact that different speech sounds have different frequency spectra and so the speech reception/discrimination capabilities of a subject are dependent on the subject hearing profile. Furthermore, noise can be used to test the breadth of the auditory filter. Test with background noise are particularly interesting for internet administered test because the controlled noise level can be set to mask the environmental noise.
6) Temporal Compression/Expansion/Masking.
Temporal compression of speech signals or tones can be used to probe auditory capabilities since it is known that temporal masking is affected by sensineural hearing impairment.
The test methods outlined above could be implemented in either a monaural or a binaural configuration. In the monaural implementation, each ear is tested individually and the other ear is "plugged" or otherwise deprived of test signal input. In an implementation scheme in which the headphones are supplied, the supplied headphones may have only one speaker. Clearly, there are advantages and disadvantages associated with either test method implementation with respect to accuracy and test complexity.
The basic test methods outlined above can be implemented within a number of different test configurations. The different test configurations may have different peripheral equipment, test protocols and they may have different levels of accuracy. Four general test configurations are based on the four possible independent combinations of the use of one of actual sound pressure level SPLa measurement and relative sound pressure level SPLr measurement, and the use of one of sensing of SPLa or SPLr at the ear and inferring
SPLa or SPLr from drive voltages. One can either measure an absolute pressure or a relative pressure and that the measurement can be either an actual pressure measurement as with a microphone or it can be a measurement that infers pressure (ie measure the voltage and know the voltage to pressure transfer function). So one can make any one, any combination of more than one, or all, of the following 4 unique measurements:
1) relative measurement using actual pressure measurements, 2) relative measurements using an inferred measurement (voltage),
3) absolute measurement using actual pressure measurements,
4) absolute measurement using an inferred measurement (voltage).
Actual SPL measurement methods measure the actual sound pressure level SPLa that coincides with the test criterion. As such, these measurements require measurement of a quantity that can be related to sound pressure level.
The SPLa can be inferred from drive voltages, rather than from audio sensors like microphones. This general method refers to the approach of using a direct measurement of the sound sources drive voltage and knowledge of the sound source's voltage-to-sound transfer function to estimate the SPL delivered during the test. Since the actual sound pressure level delivered to the ear from a given source depends greatly on the relative geometry of the source and the ear, this test method is probably requires that earphones generate the sound.
In the configuration shown in Fig. 3, a calibration source box is used in conjunction with calibrated earphones for measurement of SPLa based on inference from drive voltages. The test configuration shown in Fig. 3 includes the test server implemented as a WebSite 100. A communication link 101 is established between the WebSite 100 and the remote computer 102 acting as an end station for the test. Test control commands and information input and output are provided across the link 101 between the WebSite 100 and remote computer 102. The remote computer 102 includes input control 103 for accepting test subject input and a sound card 104 for producing audio stimuli and accepting audio input from sensors. A calibration source box 105 is coupled to the sound card 104. The source box includes a first switch 106 and a second switch 107. One output of the calibration source box 105 is calibrated headphones 106 for use by the test subject.
The calibration source box 105 is used to determine the specific input and output transfer functions of the sound card input A/D and output D/A conversions. Once the input A/D and output D/A calibrations are known, it is possible to accurately know the output drive signal. Combining this calibration knowledge with the known headphone calibration, the absolute sound pressure level can be estimated. The calibration source box 105 is a three port box containing two switches 106, 107 and three switch contacts A, B, C. It may be configured with its own power source through either a battery connection or through a wall plug.
The calibration and test process is as follows:
A simulated earphone load may need to be attached to connection point B during step 2 of the test to ensure that the output impedance seen by the sound card during calibration is the same as the load seen during the test. If this extra load is needed, then another switch and terminal will be needed. The measured sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies allows the calculation of hearing loss.
The measured sound pressure levels are the sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according to the test type.
Typically a three step calibration process is used. In the first step (Cal 1), the Signal Source is used to input a known signal into the input port of the soundcard. Measurement of the resulting digital word gives the input voltage-to-digital transfer function. This measurement is completed with the soundcard's microphone input gain set at -1/4 of its full range. Utilizing the pressure-to-voltage transfer function of the calibrated microphone allows the pressure-to-digital transfer function of the microphone/pre-amp/sound card input path to be fully defined.
The second step (Cal 2) addresses the fact that the voltage in-to-digital conversion of sound cards is not linear over the entire range of microphone gain. Furthermore, it is known that SNR is improved if the microphone gain is maximized. Cal 2 gathers the information needed to determine what input/output gain and digital word to use to optimize signal integrity and test flow speed. To complete this characterization, the sound card input is driven with a number of different soundcard output levels at number of different microphone gain levels. The combined information gathered in Cal 1 and Cal 2 completely calibrates the microphone/microphone input portion of the system.
The third calibration step (Cal 3) is used to generate the Sound card output word to ear level sound pressure transfer function. This transfer function is determined by driving the headphones with a soundcard digital word and measuring the pressure with the previously calibrated microphone/microphone input.
In one embodiment, an active audio channel during the test delivers sound to one ear, while the other audio channel is used to deliver control signals to the calibration box, for controlling the switches for example. One suitable control signal format is the DTMF tone standard used in telephone systems.
Note that if it is assumed that the sound card's input A/D transfer function is one, then an actual SPL measurement can be made using the calibrated headphones but without the calibration source box. In the this case, calibration is not required and the headphone output can be directly fed into the input of the sound card.
Fig. 4 shows a configuration suitable for SPLa measurements using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO based method. In Fig. 4, the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again. In this case, the calibration source box 105 of Fig. 3 is replaced by VCO 110 which receives an input voltage on line 111 and produces and output on line 112 based upon the signals being transmitted to calibrated headphones on line 113.
This method assumes that the sound card input port's frequency-to-frequency transfer function is one. Using this assumption, the VCO 110 is used to map the calibrated headphone drive voltage amplitude into frequency space. The drive voltage is determined through frequency space analysis of the VCO output combined with known headphone calibration.
In this test method, the test subject signals when the test criteria is met. Using the measured frequency of the VCO output, the known VCO mapping function and the known headphone calibration, the corresponding SPL can be determined. The measured sound pressure levels at the various test frequencies give the hearing loss assessment.
Actual sound pressure level SPLa may also be sensed at the ear using configurations like those shown in Figs. 5 and 6. This general method uses direct measurement of the sound pressure level at the ear. Here a calibrated microphone is used to measure the sound pressure level during the test and during the calibration program.
In the configuration of Fig. 5, a calibration source box 120 is used in conjunction with a calibrated microphone 121. In Fig. 5, the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again.
The calibration source 120 is used to determine the specific transfer functions of the sound card input A/D conversion. Combining this calibration knowledge with the known headphone calibration, the sound pressure level can be determined. The calibration source box 120 is a five port box containing three switches 122, 123, 124 and three switch contacts A, B, C. It may be configured with its own power source through either a battery connection or through a wall plug. The calibration and test process are shown in the following table.
@ all Suite data from step 1, the freq. microphone calibration data values and microphone output, the corresponding SPL can be determined.
The measured sound pressure levels are the sound pressure levels that meet the test criteria at the various test frequencies. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according the test type.
Fig. 6 shows a configuration suitable for SPLa measurements at the ear using a voltage controlled oscillator VCO based method. In Fig. 6, the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again. In this case, the calibration source box 1120 of Fig. 5 is replaced by VCO 150 which receives an input voltage on line 151 and produces an output on line 152 based upon the signals received on line 153 from transducers 155. The transducers 155 comprise headphones or speakers coupled to the sound card 104 by line 156. The headphones embodiment includes an embedded microphone, and the speaker embodiment includes a stand alone microphone. This method assumes that the sound card input port's frequency-to-frequency transfer function is one. Using this assumption, a VCO is used to map the calibrated microphone output voltage into frequency space. The microphone output is determined through frequency space analysis of the VCO output combined with the known microphone calibration.
In this test method, the test subject signals when the test criteria is met. Using the measured frequency of the VCO output, the known VCO mapping function and the known microphone calibration, the corresponding SPL can be determined. These data are then used to calculate hearing loss according the test type.
Relative measurement of sound pressure levels may also be used for some embodiments, as mentioned above. The SPL corresponding to a test criteria may not be as important as knowledge of the relative threshold of hearing across the audible frequency range. The following section outlines relative SPL level tests. Each method described could be implemented with either headphones or speakers. These test methods assume that sound card's input A/D and its output D/A converters are linear across frequency and amplitude. Furthermore, the transfer functions of any headphones, microphones or speakers used in the test are also assumed to be substantially linear across frequency and amplitude. These test methods may include input pre-amps and output attenuators. In general, the test set-ups and protocols are simpler in a relative measurement. All the test methods discussed below can use the test set-up shown in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7, the configuration components that are similar to those of Fig. 3 are given like reference numbers and not described again. In the configuration of Fig. 7, the sound card output on line 161 is supplied to a transducer/sensor 160 comprising for examples, headphones with an embedded microphone or speakers with a stand alone microphone. The microphone output is supplied on line 162 to the sound card 104.
Relative SPL measurement inferred from drive voltage is the simplest test method. The test proceeds by playing the test sounds either through the speakers or through headphones. The test subject signals when the test criterion is met. The measured data is the sound card's digital word is the output.
A method based on relative SPL measurement completed at ear requires that a microphone be used to measure the actual sound pressure level at the ear. The test configuration is shown in Fig. 7 as well. The measured data is the sound card's input digital word.
The goal of the Home Audio Test is to provide information related to the auditory capability of the subject to evaluate the subject's suitability for personalized audio. The test does not need to return any specific information about the hearing loss of the subject.
In some embodiments, it is understood that an audiogram will not provide enough information to ensure a good fit in all cases. Hence, iterations will be needed to find the correct fit. With this in mind, the goal of the test is to provide sufficient information to ensure that the first clip of reprocessed audio shows some benefit to the subject. Clearly, the first reprocessed audio can not lead to displeasing sound quality. These rather vague requirements will be translated into specific statements about accuracy, resolution, dynamic range, and frequency below. One core of the audio reprocessing algorithm involves developing corrections for recruitment. As a result, the benefits of the algorithm will be most observed by subject with predominately semi-neural hearing loss. While the details of any individuals audiogram will show a wide range in structure, for the development of this test, using the test goal stated above and the understanding that some iterations will be needed during the fit, a prototypic hearing loss profile will be assumed. The assumed hearing loss profile will be defined by the following conditions: Hearing Loss profile will follow the following equations: hl=b*exp(m*freq) where m and b are constants(slope and ln(intercept on a ln(HL) vs freq plot).
The hearing loss between 125hz and 500hz is constant and equal to the value given for 500hz from the equation given above. The assumed shape for audiograms is shown in Fig. 8.
While the present invention is disclosed by reference to the preferred embodiments and examples detailed above, it is to be understood that these examples are intended in an illustrative rather than in a limiting sense. It is contemplated that modifications and combinations will readily occur to those skilled in the art, which modifications and combinations will be within the spirit of the invention and the scope of the appended claims.

Claims

CLAIMS What is claimed is:
1. A method for conducting a hearing test using a computer program, comprising: establishing a communication channel between an end station and a server in a communication network; executing a first portion of the computer program at the server; executing a second portion of the computer program at the end station.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the communication network comprises a packet switched network.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the communication network comprises a network executing according a standard internet protocol.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the channel comprises a connection according to a standard transmission control protocol over a standard internet protocol (TCP/IP).
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second portion of the computer program includes logic that presents a set of stimuli to a user at the end station, and accepts input from the user responsive to the stimuli.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second portion of the computer program includes logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense environmental data at the end station during the test.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the second portion of the computer program includes logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense a set up at the end station during the test.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the computer program includes test control, test data processing, and test sound signal components which are distributed between said first and second portions.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer program includes a component to deliver the second portion of the computer program to the end station from a resource coupled to the communication network.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the resource comprises memory at the server.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the test control component executes a protocol responsive to the test data processing component involving interaction according to the input from the user and the environmental data sensed during the test.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the test control component executes a protocol responsive to the test data processing component involving interaction according to the input from the user and the test set up data sensed during the test.
13. The method of claim 5, wherein the second component includes logic driving a graphical user interface to the user in conjunction with the set of stimuli, prompting the user to provide said input.
14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first portion manages presentation of stimuli for the test and the second portion controls production of the stimuli at the end station.
15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hearing test comprises a hearing threshold level test.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the hearing test comprises a masking threshold level test.
17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hearing test comprises a loudness matching test.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the hearing test comprises a loudness growth in octave bands LGOB test.
19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hearing test comprises a speech reception threshold and speech discrimination in noise and quiet test.
20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the hearing test comprises a temporal compression/expansion/masking test.
21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the computer program comprises logic to make measurements to determine actual sound pressure levels of thresholds involved in the test.
22. The method of claim 1, wherein the computer program comprises logic to make measurements to determine relative sound pressure levels of thresholds involved in the test.
23. The method of claim 1 , wherein the end station comprises an internet enabled mobile phone.
24. The method of claim 1 , wherein the end station comprises a home computer.
25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the end station comprises a hand held computing platform
26. A method for conducting a hearing test using a computer program, comprising: linking an user end station to a server using a communication network; allocating test control and data processing resources between the user end station and the server; allocating test sound signal resources to the user end station; generating a sound using the test sound signal resource; accepting and processing input using the test control and data processing resources; determining a status of a test according to a test protocol, and if the test is done, then storing a hearing profile for the user, and if the test is not done, then determining a next stimulus according to the test protocol using the test control resources, and returning to the step of generating a sound.
27. The method of claim 26, wherein the communication network comprises a packet switched network.
28. The method of claim 26, wherein the communication network comprises a network executing according a standard internet protocol.
29. The method of claim 26, wherein the channel comprises a connection according to a standard transmission control protocol over a standard internet protocol (TCP/IP).
30. The method of claim 26, wherein including logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense environmental data at the end station during the test.
31. The method of claim 30, wherein the test control resources execute a test protocol responsive to the test data processing resources involving interaction according to input from the user and the environmental data sensed during the test.
32. The method of claim 30, wherein the set of stimuli includes audio stimuli, and the environmental data comprises background noise.
33. The method of claim 26, wherein including logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense test set up data at the end station during the test.
34. The method of claim 33, wherein the test control resources execute a test protocol responsive to the test data processing resources involving interaction according to input from the user and the test set up data sensed during the test.
35. The method of claim 26, including logic driving a graphical user interface in conjunction with generating the sound, which prompts the user to provide input.
36. The method of claim 26, wherein the end station comprises an internet enabled mobile phone.
37. The method of claim 26, wherein the end station comprises a home computer.
38. The method of claim 26, wherein the end station comprises a hand held computing platform.
39. A method for conducting a hearing test using a computer program, comprising: establishing a communication channel between an end station and a server in a communication network; executing a first portion of the computer program at the server; executing a second portion of the computer program at the end station, wherein the end station includes sound processing resources for producing audio signals during the test; and calibrating the sound processing resources.
40. The method of claim 39, wherein the communication network comprises a packet switched network.
41. The method of claim 39, wherein the communication network comprises a network executing according a standard internet protocol.
42. The method of claim 39, wherein the channel comprises a connection according to a standard transmission control protocol over a standard internet protocol (TCP/IP).
43. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the second portion ofthe computer program includes logic that presents a set of stimuli to a user at the end station, and accepts input from the user responsive to the stimuli.
44. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the second portion ofthe computer program includes logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense environmental data at the end station during the test.
45. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the second portion ofthe computer program includes logic controlling a sensor at the end station to sense a set up at the end station during the test.
46. The method of claim 39, wherein the computer program includes test control, test data processing, and test sound signal components which are distributed between said first and second portions.
47. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the computer program includes a component to deliver the second portion of the computer program to the end station from a resource coupled to the communication network.
48. The method of claim 47, wherein the resource comprises memory at the server.
49. The method ofclaim 46, wherein the test control component executes a protocol responsive to the test data processing component involving interaction according to the input from the user and the environmental data sensed during the test.
50. The method ofclaim 46, wherein the test control component executes a protocol responsive to the test data processing component involving interaction according to the input from the user and the test set up data sensed during the test.
51. The method of claim 43, wherein the second component includes logic driving a graphical user interface to the user in conjunction with the set of stimuli, prompting the user to provide said input.
52. The method of claim 39, wherein the first portion manages presentation of stimuli for the test and the second portion controls production ofthe stimuli at the end station.
53. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a hearing threshold level test.
54. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a masking threshold level test.
55. The method of claim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a loudness matching test.
56. The method of claim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a loudness growth in octave bands LGOB test.
57. Themethod of claim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a speech reception threshold and speech discrimination in noise and quiet test.
58. The method of claim 39, wherein the hearing test comprises a temporal compression/expansion/masking test.
59. The method of claim 39, wherein the computer program comprises logic to make measurements to determine actual sound pressure levels of thresholds involved in the test.
60. The method of claim 39, wherein the computer program comprises logic to make measurements to determine relative sound pressure levels of thresholds involved in the test.
61. The method of claim 39, wherein the end station comprises an internet enabled mobile phone.
62. The method of claim 39, wherein the end station comprises a home computer.
63. The method ofclaim 39, wherein the end station comprises a hand held computing platform
64. The method of claim 39, wherein said calibrating includes: determining an input transfer function and an output transfer function for the sound processing resources.
65. The method ofclaim 39, wherein said calibrating includes: electronically determining an input transfer function and an output transfer function for the sound processing resources.
66. The method ofclaim 39, wherein said sound processing resources have an electronic input adapted to receive analog voltage inputs representative of sound, and first and second electronic outputs adapted to supply analog voltages representative of sound, and wherein said calibrating includes: coupling a calibration device to the electronic input and the first and second electronic outputs ofthe sound processing resources; and using the calibration device to supply a test signal to the electronic input, and feeding back a processed signal output on one ofthe first and second electronic outputs to the electronic input.
67. The method ofclaim 66, including supplying control signals to the calibration device using the other ofthe first and second electronic outputs.
68. The method of claim 67, wherein the control signals comprise dual tone multi-frequency DTMF signals.
69. The method ofclaim 66, wherein the test signal comprises a tone, and including determining an input transfer function in response to the tone, and then generating the processed signal using the sound processing resources and determining an output transfer function in response to the processed signal and the input transfer function.
70. The method ofclaim 66, wherein the test signal comprises an output of a voltage controlled oscillator, and including using a signal from the sound processing resources to control the voltage controlled oscillator, and determining an output transfer function in reponse to the test signal, and determining an input transfer function in response to the processed signal and the output transfer function.
71. An apparatus for calibrating sound processing resources on an end station using a program executed by the an end station, comprising: a test signal source; a first input adapted to receive electronic inputs representative of sounds from a first output ofthe sound processing resources; a second input adapted to receive electronic inputs representative of sounds from a second output ofthe sound processing resources; an output adapted to provide electronic outputs representative of sounds to a first input of the sound processing resources; and a switch to connect the test signal source to the output, and to connect one of the first and second inputs to the output in response to control signals.
72. The apparatus ofclaim 71 , wherein the test signal source comprises a tone generator adapted for connection to the output for use in measuring an input transfer function ofthe sound processing resources.
73. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the test signal source comprises a voltage controlled oscillator, having a control input adapted to be connected to one ofthe first and second inputs, and to supply a signal to the output for use in measuring an output transfer function of the sound processing resources.
74. The apparatus of claim 71, including a circuit supplying signals from one of the first and second inputs as the control signals for the switch.
75. The apparatus of claim 74, wherein the signals from the one ofthe first and second inputs comprise dual tone multi-frequency DTMF signals.
EP00982609A 1999-09-28 2000-09-18 Internet based hearing assessment methods Withdrawn EP1216444A4 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US407751 1999-09-28
US09/407,751 US7181297B1 (en) 1999-09-28 1999-09-28 System and method for delivering customized audio data
US46403699A 1999-12-15 1999-12-15
US464036 1999-12-15
PCT/US2000/040931 WO2001026272A2 (en) 1999-09-28 2000-09-18 Internet based hearing assessment methods

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1216444A2 EP1216444A2 (en) 2002-06-26
EP1216444A4 true EP1216444A4 (en) 2006-04-12

Family

ID=27019996

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00982609A Withdrawn EP1216444A4 (en) 1999-09-28 2000-09-18 Internet based hearing assessment methods
EP00961982.6A Expired - Lifetime EP1216599B1 (en) 1999-09-28 2000-09-25 Producing and storing hearing profiles and customized audio data

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00961982.6A Expired - Lifetime EP1216599B1 (en) 1999-09-28 2000-09-25 Producing and storing hearing profiles and customized audio data

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (2) EP1216444A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2003510667A (en)
CN (2) CN1279463C (en)
AU (2) AU1961801A (en)
CA (1) CA2384251A1 (en)
WO (2) WO2001026272A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (60)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0116071D0 (en) * 2001-06-30 2001-08-22 Hewlett Packard Co Improvements in audio reproduction
US6840908B2 (en) 2001-10-12 2005-01-11 Sound Id System and method for remotely administered, interactive hearing tests
WO2003086007A2 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-16 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Audio distribution
US7698006B2 (en) 2002-10-15 2010-04-13 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for adapting audio signal according to user's preference
FR2849309B1 (en) * 2002-12-23 2005-02-11 France Telecom METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ADJUSTING THE LEVELS OF TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING A SPEECH SIGNAL IN A TELEPHONY TERMINAL CONNECTED TO A PACKET COMMUNICATION NETWORK
US8849185B2 (en) 2003-04-15 2014-09-30 Ipventure, Inc. Hybrid audio delivery system and method therefor
US8109629B2 (en) 2003-10-09 2012-02-07 Ipventure, Inc. Eyewear supporting electrical components and apparatus therefor
US11630331B2 (en) 2003-10-09 2023-04-18 Ingeniospec, Llc Eyewear with touch-sensitive input surface
EP1767056A4 (en) * 2004-06-14 2009-07-22 Johnson & Johnson Consumer System for and method of offering an optimized sound service to individuals within a place of business
US11829518B1 (en) 2004-07-28 2023-11-28 Ingeniospec, Llc Head-worn device with connection region
US11644693B2 (en) 2004-07-28 2023-05-09 Ingeniospec, Llc Wearable audio system supporting enhanced hearing support
WO2006032101A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-03-30 The Lions Ear And Hearing Institute Hearing testing
US11852901B2 (en) 2004-10-12 2023-12-26 Ingeniospec, Llc Wireless headset supporting messages and hearing enhancement
EP2030420A4 (en) 2005-03-28 2009-06-03 Sound Id Personal sound system
DE102005045899A1 (en) * 2005-09-26 2007-04-19 Siemens Audiologische Technik Gmbh Individually customizable hearing aid
US11733549B2 (en) 2005-10-11 2023-08-22 Ingeniospec, Llc Eyewear having removable temples that support electrical components
US12044901B2 (en) 2005-10-11 2024-07-23 Ingeniospec, Llc System for charging embedded battery in wireless head-worn personal electronic apparatus
US20080031475A1 (en) * 2006-07-08 2008-02-07 Personics Holdings Inc. Personal audio assistant device and method
US8208645B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2012-06-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for harmonizing calibration of audio between networked conference rooms
WO2008086112A1 (en) 2007-01-04 2008-07-17 Sound Id Personalized sound system hearing profile selection process
DE212009000019U1 (en) 2008-01-10 2010-09-02 Sound Id, Mountain View Personal sound system for displaying a sound pressure level or other environmental condition
AU2009308102B9 (en) * 2008-10-24 2014-02-20 East Carolina University Internet based multi-user diagnostic hearing assessment systems having client-server architecture with user-based access levels for secure data exchange
US8798693B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2014-08-05 Sound Id Earpiece with voice menu
US8442435B2 (en) 2010-03-02 2013-05-14 Sound Id Method of remotely controlling an Ear-level device functional element
US8379871B2 (en) 2010-05-12 2013-02-19 Sound Id Personalized hearing profile generation with real-time feedback
US8532715B2 (en) 2010-05-25 2013-09-10 Sound Id Method for generating audible location alarm from ear level device
US9138178B2 (en) 2010-08-05 2015-09-22 Ace Communications Limited Method and system for self-managed sound enhancement
US10687155B1 (en) * 2019-08-14 2020-06-16 Mimi Hearing Technologies GmbH Systems and methods for providing personalized audio replay on a plurality of consumer devices
CN103155599B (en) * 2010-10-13 2015-09-09 唯听助听器公司 The method of hearing aid device system and adapting hearing aid system
US8657759B2 (en) * 2010-11-08 2014-02-25 Cochlear Limited Compartmentalized implant fitting software
CN103262578B (en) * 2010-12-20 2017-03-29 索诺瓦公司 The method and hearing device of operation hearing device
FR2986897A1 (en) * 2012-02-10 2013-08-16 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa Method for adapting sound signals to be broadcast by sound diffusion system of e.g. smartphone, in passenger compartment of car, involves adapting sound signals into sound diffusion system as function of sound correction filter
US9748914B2 (en) 2012-08-15 2017-08-29 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. Transforming audio content for subjective fidelity
US9392967B2 (en) 2012-11-20 2016-07-19 Bitwave Pte Ltd. User interface and method to discover hearing sensitivity of user on smart phone
WO2014085510A1 (en) 2012-11-30 2014-06-05 Dts, Inc. Method and apparatus for personalized audio virtualization
CN104937954B (en) * 2013-01-09 2019-06-28 听优企业 Method and system for the enhancing of Self management sound
CN103989481B (en) * 2013-02-16 2015-12-23 上海航空电器有限公司 A kind of HRTF data base's measuring device and using method thereof
WO2014164361A1 (en) 2013-03-13 2014-10-09 Dts Llc System and methods for processing stereo audio content
CN103239236B (en) * 2013-04-27 2016-08-17 江苏贝泰福医疗科技有限公司 Hearing test and auditory sense assessment device
US11430024B2 (en) * 2013-09-04 2022-08-30 Amos M. Cohen System and method of providing a virtual guestbook
FR3016105B1 (en) * 2013-12-30 2017-03-10 Arkamys SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING MUSICAL LISTENING
US10324593B2 (en) 2014-01-28 2019-06-18 International Business Machines Corporation Impairment-adaptive electronic data interaction system
DE102015203288B3 (en) * 2015-02-24 2016-06-02 Sivantos Pte. Ltd. Method for determining wearer-specific usage data of a hearing aid, method for adjusting hearing aid settings of a hearing aid, hearing aid system and adjustment unit for a hearing aid system
CN104867512B (en) * 2015-03-26 2017-10-24 加一联创电子科技有限公司 Music data acquisition methods, earphone, audio amplifier and music player
DK201570433A1 (en) 2015-07-02 2017-01-30 Gn Hearing As Hearing device with model control and associated methods
US11224981B2 (en) * 2015-08-24 2022-01-18 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Staged advice for optimal use of a shaving device
US10708680B2 (en) 2015-08-31 2020-07-07 Nura Holdings Pty Ltd Personalization of auditory stimulus
US9497530B1 (en) * 2015-08-31 2016-11-15 Nura Holdings Pty Ltd Personalization of auditory stimulus
DK3369258T3 (en) * 2015-10-29 2021-01-18 Widex As SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HANDLING A CUSTOMIZED CONFIGURATION IN A HEARING AID
CN106725514B (en) * 2015-11-24 2019-11-12 中国移动通信集团公司 A kind of data processing method and its device
EP3414923A1 (en) 2016-02-11 2018-12-19 Widex A/S Method of fitting a hearing aid system capable of detecting auditory neuro-synaptopathy, a hearing aid fitting system and a computerized device
CN106037755A (en) * 2016-05-20 2016-10-26 深圳市易特科信息技术有限公司 Hearing health management system and method based on O2O mode
GB2554634B (en) * 2016-07-07 2020-08-05 Goshawk Communications Ltd Enhancement of audio signals
CN106344037A (en) * 2016-09-13 2017-01-25 南方科技大学 Hearing test method and device
US10483933B2 (en) 2017-03-30 2019-11-19 Sorenson Ip Holdings, Llc Amplification adjustment in communication devices
US10777048B2 (en) 2018-04-12 2020-09-15 Ipventure, Inc. Methods and apparatus regarding electronic eyewear applicable for seniors
CN108769799B (en) * 2018-05-31 2021-06-15 联想(北京)有限公司 Information processing method and electronic equipment
EP3897386A4 (en) * 2018-12-21 2022-09-07 Nura Holdings PTY Ltd Audio equalization metadata
TWI693926B (en) * 2019-03-27 2020-05-21 美律實業股份有限公司 Hearing test system and setting method thereof
US20230181062A1 (en) * 2021-12-13 2023-06-15 Gn Hearing A/S Method for hearing test and hearing test device

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3808354A (en) * 1972-12-13 1974-04-30 Audiometric Teleprocessing Inc Computer controlled method and system for audiometric screening
EP0705016A2 (en) * 1994-09-23 1996-04-03 AT&T Corp. Method for customer selection of telephone sound enhancement
WO1999018532A1 (en) * 1997-10-07 1999-04-15 Health Hero Network, Inc. Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals
WO1999027842A1 (en) * 1997-12-04 1999-06-10 Virtual-Eye.Com Visual field testing via telemedicine

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4284847A (en) * 1978-06-30 1981-08-18 Richard Besserman Audiometric testing, analyzing, and recording apparatus and method
US4489610A (en) * 1984-04-11 1984-12-25 Intech Systems Corp. Computerized audiometer
US4731850A (en) 1986-06-26 1988-03-15 Audimax, Inc. Programmable digital hearing aid system
US5495534A (en) * 1990-01-19 1996-02-27 Sony Corporation Audio signal reproducing apparatus
EP0465662B1 (en) * 1990-01-19 1998-03-18 Sony Corporation Apparatus for reproducing acoustic signals
US5371799A (en) * 1993-06-01 1994-12-06 Qsound Labs, Inc. Stereo headphone sound source localization system
US6022315A (en) * 1993-12-29 2000-02-08 First Opinion Corporation Computerized medical diagnostic and treatment advice system including network access
US5500902A (en) 1994-07-08 1996-03-19 Stockham, Jr.; Thomas G. Hearing aid device incorporating signal processing techniques
DE69534796T2 (en) * 1994-12-01 2006-10-12 Sharp K.K. communicator
US5841979A (en) * 1995-05-25 1998-11-24 Information Highway Media Corp. Enhanced delivery of audio data
US5854843A (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-12-29 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Virtual navigator, and inertial angular measurement system
US5928160A (en) * 1996-10-30 1999-07-27 Clark; Richard L. Home hearing test system and method
EP0912029A2 (en) * 1997-10-24 1999-04-28 Deutsche Telekom AG Method for customizing telecommunication terminals
US5868683A (en) * 1997-10-24 1999-02-09 Scientific Learning Corporation Techniques for predicting reading deficit based on acoustical measurements
EP2290972A2 (en) 1998-02-23 2011-03-02 Personal Audio LLC System for distributing personalized audio programming
US6061431A (en) * 1998-10-09 2000-05-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method for hearing loss compensation in telephony systems based on telephone number resolution

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3808354A (en) * 1972-12-13 1974-04-30 Audiometric Teleprocessing Inc Computer controlled method and system for audiometric screening
EP0705016A2 (en) * 1994-09-23 1996-04-03 AT&T Corp. Method for customer selection of telephone sound enhancement
WO1999018532A1 (en) * 1997-10-07 1999-04-15 Health Hero Network, Inc. Networked system for interactive communication and remote monitoring of individuals
WO1999027842A1 (en) * 1997-12-04 1999-06-10 Virtual-Eye.Com Visual field testing via telemedicine

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1399740A (en) 2003-02-26
EP1216444A2 (en) 2002-06-26
EP1216599B1 (en) 2018-05-30
CN1377567A (en) 2002-10-30
WO2001026272A3 (en) 2001-12-13
JP2003510667A (en) 2003-03-18
EP1216599A1 (en) 2002-06-26
CA2384251A1 (en) 2001-04-05
EP1216599A4 (en) 2006-06-07
WO2001026272A2 (en) 2001-04-12
AU7385600A (en) 2001-04-30
WO2001024576A1 (en) 2001-04-05
AU1961801A (en) 2001-05-10
CN1279463C (en) 2006-10-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1216444A2 (en) Internet based hearing assessment methods
US6840908B2 (en) System and method for remotely administered, interactive hearing tests
US9894450B2 (en) Self-fitting of a hearing device
US11665488B2 (en) Auditory device assembly
EP2109934B1 (en) Personalized sound system hearing profile selection
CN103239236B (en) Hearing test and auditory sense assessment device
US9253583B2 (en) Automated fitting of hearing devices
US6895345B2 (en) Portable hearing-related analysis system
US8447042B2 (en) System and method for audiometric assessment and user-specific audio enhancement
US10341790B2 (en) Self-fitting of a hearing device
US8213627B2 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring a hearing aid
JPH0824399B2 (en) Hearing aid, signal supply device, device and method for compensating for hearing impairment
EP1250089A1 (en) Method and system for on-line hearing examination and correction
US11558697B2 (en) Method to acquire preferred dynamic range function for speech enhancement
US20150257683A1 (en) Apparatus for testing hearing
US20220225039A1 (en) Self-fitting hearing aid having built-in pure tone signal generator
EP2124479A1 (en) Correction device for an audio reproducing device
WO2006032101A1 (en) Hearing testing
GB2494540A (en) Audiometering over the internet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020328

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20060228

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: H04L 29/06 20060101ALI20060222BHEP

Ipc: H04L 29/08 20060101ALI20060222BHEP

Ipc: G06F 19/00 20060101AFI20060222BHEP

Ipc: H04R 5/00 20060101ALI20060222BHEP

Ipc: G06F 15/16 20060101ALI20060222BHEP

Ipc: A61B 5/12 20060101ALI20060222BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20061205