[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1178728A1 - Plant growth regulant - Google Patents

Plant growth regulant

Info

Publication number
EP1178728A1
EP1178728A1 EP00926613A EP00926613A EP1178728A1 EP 1178728 A1 EP1178728 A1 EP 1178728A1 EP 00926613 A EP00926613 A EP 00926613A EP 00926613 A EP00926613 A EP 00926613A EP 1178728 A1 EP1178728 A1 EP 1178728A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
composition
surfactant
plant growth
citric acid
growth regulant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00926613A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
John S. Lojek
Margaret Anne Lojek
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ecoval Corp
Original Assignee
Ecoval Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ecoval Corp filed Critical Ecoval Corp
Publication of EP1178728A1 publication Critical patent/EP1178728A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01NPRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N37/00Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids
    • A01N37/36Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids containing at least one carboxylic group or a thio analogue, or a derivative thereof, and a singly bound oxygen or sulfur atom attached to the same carbon skeleton, this oxygen or sulfur atom not being a member of a carboxylic group or of a thio analogue, or of a derivative thereof, e.g. hydroxy-carboxylic acids

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to aqueous compositions of acetic acid and citric acid in combination with a surfactant and to aqueous compositions of citric acid in combination with a surfactant, that may be used as a plant growth regulant.
  • growth regulants In order to be suitable for use on ornamental plants or with grains, growth regulants must be effective without causing visible damage to foliage. Damage to foliage would not be acceptable to either greenhouse growers or buyers. For instance, if a plant growth regulant caused damage such as leaf or stem burning, or twisting of leaves, it would be deemed to be unacceptable.
  • dark green colour is associated with an indication of health and vigour of the plant.
  • the green colour may be produced by feeding the plant with certain nutrients, such as nitrogen.
  • U.S. Patent No.5 705 455 which is directed to herbicidal compositions, discloses test results in which a combination of acetic acid and citric acid produced higher fresh weight in corn plants that were not damaged or killed by the herbicidal application. Higher fresh weight in corn usually means bigger plants, which is the reverse to what is needed to produce compact plants as would be obtained with a plant growth regulant.
  • a plant growth regulant in the form of an aqueous composition of acetic acid and citric acid in combination with a surfactant has now been found. Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous composition comprising acetic acid and citric acid, in combination with surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous plant growth regulant composition of acetic and citric acids, in combination with surfactant, said composition being more effective as a plant growth regulant than any combination of one or two of acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant at the same concentration.
  • the concentration of acetic and citric acids and surfactant is such that the composition does not exhibit herbicidal properties on tomatoes.
  • the ratio of acetic acid to citric acid is in the range of 10:1 to 1 :1 on a weight basis, the concentration of acetic acid being less than 8 g/l.
  • a further aspect of the present invention provides use of aqueous compositions of acetic and citric acids in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
  • Another aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous plant growth regulant composition comprising acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant.
  • a further aspect provides an aqueous composition comprising citric acid and surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
  • Yet another aspect provides use of aqueous compositions of citric acid in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
  • the present invention relates to aqueous plant growth regulant compositions of acetic and citric acid in combination with surfactant.
  • the combination of acetic and citric acids with surfactant exhibits synergistic effects as a plant growth regulant.
  • the resulting composition is more effective as a plant growth regulant than a corresponding composition of acetic acid, citric acid or surfactant alone at the same concentration or a combination of acetic acid and surfactant.
  • the present invention provides compositions of citric acid and surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
  • the combination of citric acid with surfactant exhibits synergistic effects as a plant growth regulant.
  • the resulting composition is more effective as a plant growth regulant than a corresponding composition of citric acid or surfactant alone at the same concentration.
  • the plant growth regulant compositions may be formulated so that the concentration of the acid(s) is such that the compositions do not exhibit herbicidal properties with respect to a particular plant.
  • the compositions may be formulated to not exhibit herbicidal properties with respect to cucumbers, tomatoes, cabbage, roses and peppers, broad leaf plants and/or other vegetation.
  • compositions of acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant which is a preferred embodiment.
  • a composition of the invention comprises a synergistic combination of acetic acid and citric acid, with surfactant, in aqueous solution.
  • the acetic acid component is conveniently provided by domestic white vinegar while the citric acid is conveniently provided by lemon juice or juices of other citrus fruits. It is understood, however, that industrial sources of either or both of these components may be used.
  • the composition may be formulated using glacial acetic acid.
  • the weight ratio of acetic acid to citric acid in the plant growth regulant composition may vary over a wide range, for instance, in the range of from about 10:1 to about 1 :1 , preferably in the range of 4:1 to 1 :1 , on a weight basis. In embodiments, the weight ratio of acetic acid to citric acid is in the range of 4:1 to about 2:1.
  • the plant growth regulant composition in use may contain up to
  • composition should contain at least 1 g/l of acetic acid and 0.5 g/l of citric acid. Preferred compositions contain about 4 g/l of acetic acid and 2 g/l of citric acid.
  • the plant growth regulant activity requires the combination of acetic acid and citric acid with at least one surfactant. The amount of surfactant should be at least equal to the amount of citric acid.
  • surfactants may be used. However, it is known that some surfactants exhibit herbicidal activity when used alone and such surfactants should not be used in the compositions of the invention.
  • a particularly preferred composition contains acetic acid, citric acid and a surfactant available as SpontoTM 300T.
  • Sponto 300T is understood to be an anionic/non-ionic surfactant blend, and is available from Witco. Other surfactants may be used.
  • the amount of surfactant should be in the range of 0.1-40 g/l, preferably 1-5 g/l.
  • a further composition of the present invention comprises a combination of citric acid with surfactant, in aqueous solution.
  • sources of citric acid have been discussed above.
  • a preferred surfactant is SpontoTM 300T.
  • the concentration of citric acid is in the range of 1-30 g/litre, and especially 3-10 g/litre.
  • the concentration of citric acid and surfactant should be such that the composition does not cause plant damage for the particular plant that is to be treated.
  • the plant growth regulant composition may be formulated so as to be effective on one or more of a variety of plants, and different compositions and concentrations may be preferred with some plants.
  • the present invention may be used on a wide variety of plants, especially flowering and fruit-bearing plants.
  • the present invention may be used to increase flower-set in the plants, which would lead to increased fruit-set in plants that bear fruit.
  • Examples include peppers, tomatoes, and other fruit bearing vegetables; impatients, begonias, zinnias, dianthus, marigolds and other flowering plants; corn and other fruit or seed producing plants of the grass family; and other plants that produce flowers or fruit.
  • the present invention may be used on tropical fruit-bearing plants or trees e.g. citrus trees, pineapples or the like.
  • the compositions are used as plant growth regulants on a variety of vegetation.
  • Non-Stop Tuberous Root Begonia All plant material was purchased as young seedlings in plug trays typical of the bedding plant industry. The seedlings were transplanted into individual plastic cell packs containing four cells per pack. The exceptions were the tuberous begonias, which were planted into four inch plastic pots. The growing media consisted of typical peat moss-based soil commonly used in the greenhouse industry. All experiments with flowering plants were conducted in a greenhouse maintained at 70°F night temperature. Untreated plants i.e. control plants, in all experiments were sprayed with water only.
  • Transplanted plants were placed on a greenhouse bench and were watered with water containing a water-soluble fertilizer that is commonly used in a greenhouse. After one week, the plants were sprayed with a composition of 2 g acetic acid plus 1 g citric acid plus 5 g Sponto 300T surfactant in 1000 ml of water. All plants were sprayed to runoff. After a further week, the plants were sprayed again with the same composition. The plants were then allowed to grow for three weeks before evaluation. Each experiment was replicated four times. The results obtained are given in Table 1.
  • Seedlings were planted in cell packs. Twelve-cell packs were placed on a plastic tray standard in the bedding plant industry. The plants were sprayed in similar fashion to tuberous root begonias.
  • Zinnia Plants were placed in four-inch plastic pots and allowed to grow for two weeks. Each plant was sprayed once with the composition noted above.
  • the treated and untreated plants were measured three weeks after spraying.
  • Seedlings were transplanted into cell packs and allowed to grow for two days. The seedlings were then sprayed once. After a further two weeks, the height of treated and untreated plants was measured. The colour of the plants was noted at the same time.
  • Witconol SN-90 surfactant is an ethoxylated acohol.
  • citric acid on plant branching was determined, by spraying three plants of Fuchsia (6.0 cm tall) with 5 g citric acid per litre of water. Control plants were sprayed with water only. The plants were planted in 10 inch plastic pots. The plants were allowed to grow for three months, and then were evaluated for the number of side branches. The results obtained are shown in Table 9. Each experiment was replicated three times.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
  • Pest Control & Pesticides (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)

Abstract

An aqueous composition of citric acid or acetic acid and citric acid, in combination with a surfactant, for use as a plant growth regulant. In aspects, the regulant may be used to modify plant growth by giving more compact plants, as well as improvements in flowers, yield and general appearance.

Description

TITLE:
PLANT GROWTH REGULANT
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to aqueous compositions of acetic acid and citric acid in combination with a surfactant and to aqueous compositions of citric acid in combination with a surfactant, that may be used as a plant growth regulant.
Background of the Invention
It is well known that certain chemicals can act as plant growth regulants. Such chemicals may modify plant growth, flowering, yield and/or general appearance. Some of these chemicals are natural plant hormones, whereas others have been synthesized. Examples of the latter chemicals are known in the trade, under a number of different trade names e.g. A-rest (Ancymidol), B-nine SP (Daminozide) and Cycocel (Chlormequant-Chloride). These chemicals are used on different plants to modify their height, since sturdy compact plants are easier to grow in the greenhouse and are preferred by most people. Cycocel is also used on cereals to produce shorter plants that are more resistant to lodging.
In order to be suitable for use on ornamental plants or with grains, growth regulants must be effective without causing visible damage to foliage. Damage to foliage would not be acceptable to either greenhouse growers or buyers. For instance, if a plant growth regulant caused damage such as leaf or stem burning, or twisting of leaves, it would be deemed to be unacceptable.
It is well known that dark green colour is associated with an indication of health and vigour of the plant. The green colour may be produced by feeding the plant with certain nutrients, such as nitrogen.
However, this leads to rapid growth of the plant. Consequently, elongated plants are obtained, rather than compact sturdy plants, which is contrary to grower's objective with a plant growth regulant.
U.S. Patent No.5 705 455, which is directed to herbicidal compositions, discloses test results in which a combination of acetic acid and citric acid produced higher fresh weight in corn plants that were not damaged or killed by the herbicidal application. Higher fresh weight in corn usually means bigger plants, which is the reverse to what is needed to produce compact plants as would be obtained with a plant growth regulant.
Summary of the Invention
A plant growth regulant in the form of an aqueous composition of acetic acid and citric acid in combination with a surfactant has now been found. Accordingly, one aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous composition comprising acetic acid and citric acid, in combination with surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
Another aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous plant growth regulant composition of acetic and citric acids, in combination with surfactant, said composition being more effective as a plant growth regulant than any combination of one or two of acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant at the same concentration.
In preferred embodiments of the present invention, the concentration of acetic and citric acids and surfactant is such that the composition does not exhibit herbicidal properties on tomatoes.
In another embodiment, the ratio of acetic acid to citric acid is in the range of 10:1 to 1 :1 on a weight basis, the concentration of acetic acid being less than 8 g/l.
A further aspect of the present invention provides use of aqueous compositions of acetic and citric acids in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant. Another aspect of the present invention provides an aqueous plant growth regulant composition comprising acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant. A further aspect provides an aqueous composition comprising citric acid and surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
Yet another aspect provides use of aqueous compositions of citric acid in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
Detailed Description of the Invention
In embodiments, the present invention relates to aqueous plant growth regulant compositions of acetic and citric acid in combination with surfactant. The combination of acetic and citric acids with surfactant exhibits synergistic effects as a plant growth regulant. In particular, the resulting composition is more effective as a plant growth regulant than a corresponding composition of acetic acid, citric acid or surfactant alone at the same concentration or a combination of acetic acid and surfactant.
In other embodiments, the present invention provides compositions of citric acid and surfactant as a plant growth regulant. The combination of citric acid with surfactant exhibits synergistic effects as a plant growth regulant. In particular, the resulting composition is more effective as a plant growth regulant than a corresponding composition of citric acid or surfactant alone at the same concentration.
In addition, the plant growth regulant compositions may be formulated so that the concentration of the acid(s) is such that the compositions do not exhibit herbicidal properties with respect to a particular plant. In particular, the compositions may be formulated to not exhibit herbicidal properties with respect to cucumbers, tomatoes, cabbage, roses and peppers, broad leaf plants and/or other vegetation.
The present invention will be particularly described herein with respect to compositions of acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant, which is a preferred embodiment.
A composition of the invention comprises a synergistic combination of acetic acid and citric acid, with surfactant, in aqueous solution. The acetic acid component is conveniently provided by domestic white vinegar while the citric acid is conveniently provided by lemon juice or juices of other citrus fruits. It is understood, however, that industrial sources of either or both of these components may be used. For instance, the composition may be formulated using glacial acetic acid. The weight ratio of acetic acid to citric acid in the plant growth regulant composition may vary over a wide range, for instance, in the range of from about 10:1 to about 1 :1 , preferably in the range of 4:1 to 1 :1 , on a weight basis. In embodiments, the weight ratio of acetic acid to citric acid is in the range of 4:1 to about 2:1. The plant growth regulant composition in use may contain up to
100 g/l of acetic acid and 50 g/l of citric acid, with the preferred amount of acetic acid being up to 10g/l and especially up to 4 g/l. The composition should contain at least 1 g/l of acetic acid and 0.5 g/l of citric acid. Preferred compositions contain about 4 g/l of acetic acid and 2 g/l of citric acid. The plant growth regulant activity requires the combination of acetic acid and citric acid with at least one surfactant. The amount of surfactant should be at least equal to the amount of citric acid.
It is believed that a wide variety of surfactants may be used. However, it is known that some surfactants exhibit herbicidal activity when used alone and such surfactants should not be used in the compositions of the invention.
A particularly preferred composition contains acetic acid, citric acid and a surfactant available as Sponto™ 300T. Sponto 300T is understood to be an anionic/non-ionic surfactant blend, and is available from Witco. Other surfactants may be used. The amount of surfactant should be in the range of 0.1-40 g/l, preferably 1-5 g/l.
A further composition of the present invention comprises a combination of citric acid with surfactant, in aqueous solution. Sources of citric acid have been discussed above. A preferred surfactant is Sponto™ 300T. In preferred embodiments, the concentration of citric acid is in the range of 1-30 g/litre, and especially 3-10 g/litre. However, as noted above, the concentration of citric acid and surfactant should be such that the composition does not cause plant damage for the particular plant that is to be treated.
The plant growth regulant composition may be formulated so as to be effective on one or more of a variety of plants, and different compositions and concentrations may be preferred with some plants.
The present invention may be used on a wide variety of plants, especially flowering and fruit-bearing plants. In particular, the present invention may be used to increase flower-set in the plants, which would lead to increased fruit-set in plants that bear fruit. Examples include peppers, tomatoes, and other fruit bearing vegetables; impatients, begonias, zinnias, dianthus, marigolds and other flowering plants; corn and other fruit or seed producing plants of the grass family; and other plants that produce flowers or fruit. In addition, the present invention may be used on tropical fruit-bearing plants or trees e.g. citrus trees, pineapples or the like. In other embodiments, the compositions are used as plant growth regulants on a variety of vegetation.
The present invention is illustrated by the following examples:
EXAMPLE I
Materials and Methods:
All plant material was purchased as young seedlings in plug trays typical of the bedding plant industry. The seedlings were transplanted into individual plastic cell packs containing four cells per pack. The exceptions were the tuberous begonias, which were planted into four inch plastic pots. The growing media consisted of typical peat moss-based soil commonly used in the greenhouse industry. All experiments with flowering plants were conducted in a greenhouse maintained at 70°F night temperature. Untreated plants i.e. control plants, in all experiments were sprayed with water only. Non-Stop Tuberous Root Begonia:
Transplanted plants were placed on a greenhouse bench and were watered with water containing a water-soluble fertilizer that is commonly used in a greenhouse. After one week, the plants were sprayed with a composition of 2 g acetic acid plus 1 g citric acid plus 5 g Sponto 300T surfactant in 1000 ml of water. All plants were sprayed to runoff. After a further week, the plants were sprayed again with the same composition. The plants were then allowed to grow for three weeks before evaluation. Each experiment was replicated four times. The results obtained are given in Table 1.
Impatiens "Accent Red":
Seedlings were planted in cell packs. Twelve-cell packs were placed on a plastic tray standard in the bedding plant industry. The plants were sprayed in similar fashion to tuberous root begonias.
The colour of the foliage and the appearance of the leaves were evaluated by several people. The results obtained are given in Table 2.
Zinnia: Plants were placed in four-inch plastic pots and allowed to grow for two weeks. Each plant was sprayed once with the composition noted above.
The treated and untreated plants were measured three weeks after spraying.
Dianthus Telstar F1 Hybrid:
Seedlings were transplanted into cell packs and allowed to grow for two days. The seedlings were then sprayed once. After a further two weeks, the height of treated and untreated plants was measured. The colour of the plants was noted at the same time.
The results obtained are given in Table 4. Pepper var. Enterprise:
Individual plants were planted in six-inch plastic pots and allowed to grow for two weeks. Plants were sprayed twice, at an interval of one week, and the height of the plants was recorded four weeks later. Blooms were counted after a further three weeks.
The results obtained are given in Table 5.
Results:
Table 1 : Non-Stop Tuberous Root Begonia
Treatment Number of Branches Unsprayed 7 Sprayed once 13 Sprayed twice 13
Table 2: Impatiens Accent Red
Treatment Height Number of Branches Colour Control 10.4 cm 11 Light green
Sprayed twice 9.3 cm 18 Dark green
Table 3: Zinnia
Treatment Height Unsprayed 12.0 cm Sprayed once 10.0 cm Table 4: Dianthus Telstar F1 Hybrid
Treatment Height Colour
Unsprayed 3.8 cm Light green
Sprayed once 2.8 cm Dark green
Table 5: Pepper var. Enterprise
Treatment Heiαht Number of Blooms Colour
Unsprayed 30.0 cm 20 Light green
Sprayed once 20.0 cm 35 Dark green
The results clearly demonstrate that the application of the combination of acetic and citric acid to young plants results in shorter, more branched and greener plants. This produces several benefits to growers, without any foliar damage. The increase in number of blooms will result in the setting of more fruit, which will result to yield improvements, which would be especially beneficial in agriculturally-important crops.
EXAMPLE II
To determine whether citric acid alone could produce a reduction in height and be a plant growth regulant, several flowering plants were sprayed with different concentrations of citric acid plus surfactant. Details of the compositions are given in Table 6.
The height and condition of the plants was measured four weeks after application of the composition. The results are summarized in Table 6 below. Table 6
ca = citric acid Sponto = Sponto 300T surfactant
The same experimental procedure was repeated using tomato plants var. Emanuelle. The results are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7
ca = citric acid
Sponto = Sponto 300T surfactant
The results on flowers and vegetables showed that citric acid reduced plant height and caused an increase in lateral branching. The best results were obtained with compositions having 5 g/l of citric acid. At this rate of application, no plant injury occurred.
Stunting of plants increased with increasing concentration of citric acid. At an application rate of 20 g per litre or higher, plant injury or total kill of the plant became evident, especially with tomatoes, thereby showing variations in concentration that are effective.
EXAMPLE III
Experiments were conducted to show that the nature of the surfactant had an impact on the plant.
Using a concentration of 20 g/l citric acid, use of 3 g Witconol SN-90 surfactant resulted in severe damage on petunia stems. However, this damage was not evident when the same concentration of Sponto 300T was used as the surfactant.
Witconol SN-90 surfactant is an ethoxylated acohol.
Table 8
ca = citric acid
EXAMPLE IV
The effect of citric acid on plant branching was determined, by spraying three plants of Fuchsia (6.0 cm tall) with 5 g citric acid per litre of water. Control plants were sprayed with water only. The plants were planted in 10 inch plastic pots. The plants were allowed to grow for three months, and then were evaluated for the number of side branches. The results obtained are shown in Table 9. Each experiment was replicated three times.
Table 9
ca = citric acid
The results show that the citric acid/surfactant solution induced more branching in plants, thus producing more bushy and valuable plants.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. An aqueous composition comprising acetic acid and citric acid, in combination with surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
2. The composition of Claim 1 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in flower-set in a flowering plant.
3. The composition of Claim 1 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in fruit-set in a fruit-bearing plant.
4. The composition of Claim 1 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in fruit-set of a tropical plant or tree.
5. An aqueous plant growth regulant composition of acetic and citric acids, in combination with surfactant, said composition being more effective as a plant growth regulant than any combination of one or two of acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant at the same concentration.
6. The composition of Claim 5 in which the concentration of acetic and citric acids and surfactant is such that the composition does not exhibit herbicidal properties on tomatoes.
7. An aqueous plant growth regulant composition of acetic acid and citric acid, in combination with the ratio of acetic acid to citric acid being in the range of 10:1 to 1 :1 on a weight basis, the concentration of acetic acid being less than 8 g/l.
8. The composition of Claim 7 in which the ratio is in the range of
4:1 to 1 :1 on a weight basis.
9. Use of aqueous compositions of acetic and citric acids in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
10. The use of Claim 9 in which there is absence of herbicidal activity.
11. An aqueous plant growth regulant composition comprising acetic acid, citric acid and surfactant.
12. The aqueous composition of Claim 11 in which the surfactant is
Sponto™ 300T surfactant.
13. An aqueous composition comprising citric acid and surfactant, said composition being effective as a plant growth regulant.
14. The aqueous composition of Claim 13 in which the surfactant is Sponto™ 300T surfactant.
15. The aqueous composition of Claim 13 in which the concentration of citric acid is in the range of 1 - 30 g/litre.
16. The aqueous composition of Claim 15 in which the concentration of citric acid is 3 - 10 g/litre.
17. The aqueous composition of Claim 13 in which the surfactant is
Sponto 300T, the concentrations of citric acid and surfactant being such that the composition does not cause plant damage.
18. The composition of Claim 13 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in flower-set in a flowering plant.
19. The composition of Claim 13 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in fruit-set in a fruit-bearing plant.
20. The composition of Claim 13 in which the plant growth regulant effects an increase in fruit-set of a tropical plant or tree.
21. Use of aqueous compositions of citric acid in combination with surfactant as a plant growth regulant.
22. The use of Claim 21 in which there is absence of herbicidal activity.
EP00926613A 1999-05-14 2000-05-08 Plant growth regulant Withdrawn EP1178728A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13416299P 1999-05-14 1999-05-14
US134162P 1999-05-14
PCT/CA2000/000531 WO2000069263A1 (en) 1999-05-14 2000-05-08 Plant growth regulant

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1178728A1 true EP1178728A1 (en) 2002-02-13

Family

ID=22462038

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00926613A Withdrawn EP1178728A1 (en) 1999-05-14 2000-05-08 Plant growth regulant

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1178728A1 (en)
AU (1) AU4531100A (en)
CA (1) CA2373597A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000069263A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113973821B (en) * 2021-11-19 2023-03-31 广东省科学院南繁种业研究所 Drought-resistant agent and method for improving drought resistance of plants

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5634565B2 (en) * 1974-06-07 1981-08-11
JPH02178203A (en) * 1988-12-28 1990-07-11 Hokko Chem Ind Co Ltd Yield increase agent for crops and yield increase
JPH0446104A (en) * 1990-06-12 1992-02-17 Kankyo Riyokuka Shigen Kaihatsu Center:Kk Plant growth promoter
JP2533010B2 (en) * 1991-05-10 1996-09-11 磐田化学工業株式会社 Agricultural auxiliary materials and their usage
GB9117114D0 (en) * 1991-08-08 1991-09-25 Terra Care International Corp Herbicidal composition
US5888938A (en) * 1994-07-18 1999-03-30 Ecoval Inc. Herbicidal composition and use
WO2000015035A1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2000-03-23 Ecoval Inc. Insecticidal composition

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO0069263A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU4531100A (en) 2000-12-05
WO2000069263A1 (en) 2000-11-23
CA2373597A1 (en) 2000-11-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chaudhary et al. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) at Rampur, Chitwan
AP655A (en) Use of betaine and adjuvant to improve the yield of plants.
JP2613136B2 (en) Plant growth promoter
Pomper et al. The North American pawpaw: botany and horticulture
US4309205A (en) Enhancement of reproductive plant development by means of choline salts
KR100395834B1 (en) Aqueous alkaline and aqueous formulations for promoting the growth of plant roots, and methods for promoting the growth of plant roots in soil or hydroponic water
Rana et al. Biostimulatory effect of seaweed extract on the fruiting and runner production of Strawberry
JPH08225408A (en) Plant chlorophyll content improving method
Zheng et al. Greenhouse pepper growth and yield response to copper application
CA2199368A1 (en) Improving the yield of plants
WO2000069263A1 (en) Plant growth regulant
AU695155B2 (en) Improving the yield of plants
Antonio et al. Growth and leaf colour responses of oleander (Nerium oleander L.) to pinching and chlormequat chloride treatment
JPS6072802A (en) Platen growth regulating agent
Kahu Effect of preharvest foliar applied calcium on postharvest quality and storability of apples in Estonia
EP1139747B1 (en) Method for controlling fungi
Lieten Effect of metosulam and glyphosate on flower abnormalities of strawberry
Ray Effect of GA3 on Leaf Nutrients and Chemical Composition of Mango
JP2000053517A (en) Physiologically active substance for plant and its usage
JP2006121975A (en) Method for cultivating plant body
US3694183A (en) Process for correcting iron chlorosis in plants
Gonzalez et al. Effect of gibberellic acid on yield and quality of fall-harvested and overwintered spinach
Mitra et al. Advances in the Production and Research of Lychee in India
Newton Seed Germination and Seedling Growth as Influenced by Different Kinds of Sawdusts
Hussein INFLUENCE OF COLD STORAGE OF UNROOTED CUTTINGS ON SOME VEGETATIVE, ROOTING AND FLOWERING CHARACTERS OF Dianthus caryophyllus L. cvs.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20011113

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020122

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: REGULATING PLANT GROWTH

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20030404