EP1042370B1 - Polymerisation method - Google Patents
Polymerisation method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1042370B1 EP1042370B1 EP98962559A EP98962559A EP1042370B1 EP 1042370 B1 EP1042370 B1 EP 1042370B1 EP 98962559 A EP98962559 A EP 98962559A EP 98962559 A EP98962559 A EP 98962559A EP 1042370 B1 EP1042370 B1 EP 1042370B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- group
- surfactant
- monomer
- unsaturated
- polymerisation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
- C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
- C08F2/00—Processes of polymerisation
- C08F2/12—Polymerisation in non-solvents
- C08F2/16—Aqueous medium
- C08F2/22—Emulsion polymerisation
- C08F2/24—Emulsion polymerisation with the aid of emulsifying agents
- C08F2/26—Emulsion polymerisation with the aid of emulsifying agents anionic
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S526/00—Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 series
- Y10S526/911—Emulsifying agents
Definitions
- This invention relates to the free radical initiated addition polymerisation of unsaturated monomers in the presence of surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
- surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
- BE-A 630 043 discloses an aqueous dispersion containing a dispersible and an aqueous phase in which an anionic emulsifier is dissolved.
- US-A-2 606 178 discloses a process of emulsion polymerising styrene using novel emulsifiers which are prepared by condensation of alkylene oxides with hydrocarbon acid or alcohols with subsequent sulfonation.
- EP-A-O 755 946 discloses surfactant compounds which are based on monesters of dibasic acids with complex unsaturated groups which appear principally to be based on acrylate esters or similar materials.
- EP-A-O 026 932 discloses an aqueous emulsion produced from the reaction product of vinyl acid monomer and another copolymerizable monomer or monomers. High solids content aqueous vinyl acetate emulsions having long term stability are provided by polymerizing vinyl acetate in the presence of this aqueous emulsion.
- WO99 07673 A1 which was filed before this application but published afterwards, discloses anionic alkoxylate surfactants of formula R-(C(O)) m -Y-(CH(R')-CH(R')-O-) n -X where R is a di or tri unsaturated C4-22 straight or branched hydrocarbon chain, at least two double bonds of said unsaturated chain being conjugated and exhibiting oppositie geometric isomerism, m is 0 or 1, Y is O or NR, each R 1 is independently selected from hydrogen, C1-6 alkyl and phenyl, n is 1 to 50 and OX is an anionic group selected from the group consisting of acids or salts of sulphate, phosphate, sulphosuccinate, carboxymethyl, maleate, carboxyethyl, alkenylsuccinate, phthalate, sulphoethyl, 3-sulpho-2-hydroxypropyl, sulphopropyl, oxalate and
- the present invention adopts a different approach to WO/13849 A to enabling polymerisation at desirable higher temperatures by using anionically modifying conjugated unsaturated fatty alcohol ethoxylate surfactants.
- anionically modified surfactants can be used at temperatures significantly higher than is possible using the unsaturated fatty alcohol moderate ethoxylates of the prior art without the molecular weight penalty and other disadvantages of very high ethoxylates. They are also very efficient during particle nucleation, including at elevated temperatures e.g. 60 to 100°C, thus enabling the manufacture of product polymers with particles having a controlled smaller particle size without requiring the use of other surfactants especially at the particle nucleation stage.
- the anionically modified surfactants are to a large extent covalently grafted into the product polymer and latices made with these polymers have improved water resistance against blushing and absorb less water than conventional products.
- the present invention provides a method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including (i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I): R 1 -(OA) n -X (I) where
- the method of this invention is particularly applicable to emulsion polymerisation, especially the oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of ethylenically unsaturated monomers.
- the method is applicable to the polymerisation of systems using or including acrylic monomers and/or vinyl monomers, particularly in oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation.
- The, desirably conjugated, double bond system is preferably not terminal in the overall hydrocarbyl group.
- the group R 2 desirably contributes chains of at least 2 carbon atoms, more usually at least 3 and preferably at least 4 carbon atoms to the overall hydrocarbyl chain; correspondingly I is desirably at least 2 and preferably at least 3.
- the group R 1 is the residue of an alcohol, R 1 OH, which is desirably a conjugated isomer of linoleyl alcohol.
- the residues can be derived from the corresponding alcohol which can be made by rearrangement e.g.
- the alcohol used in the synthesis of the surfactant or the residues can be made in situ by allowing the rearrangement to take place during surfactant synthesis e.g. under alkali catalysts during alkoxylation of linoleyl alcohol, When derived from linoleyl alcohol In this way the product will be a mixture of compounds with the two conjugated unsaturation patterns, typically containing approximately equal amounts of each compound.
- Other doubly unsaturated residues can be made from corresponding natural source materials by similar methods.
- alkoxylates of abietyl alcohol the alcohol derived from reduction of the carboxyl group in abletic acid; systematically named as 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10,10a-decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1-hydroxymethyl-phenanthrene).
- the doubly unsaturated material will be available in mixture with other similar compounds having different levels of unsaturation. Mixtures of doubly unsaturated alcohol residues with singly unsaturated residues and even proportions of saturated residues can be used. Generally it is desirable that the proportion of multiple, especially double, unsaturated R 1 residues is at least 15 mole%, desirably at least 40 mole%, and preferably at least 50 mole%. Typical commercially available double unsaturated materials contain from 40 to 65 mole% commonly about 50%, double unsaturated residues. Such materials can be used satisfactorily in this invention. Materials having higher levels of double unsaturated residues may provide additional benefits but are significantly more expensive.
- Suitable phosphorus acid groups for group X include phosphate: -O-P-(O)(OH) 2 and monoester phosphate -O-P-(O)(OR 4 )(OH), where R 4 is an ester forming group, typically a group of the formula R 1 -O-(OA) n -, where R 1 , OA, and n are as defined above for formula (I) and is usually the same as the other group R 1 -O-(OA) n - defined in formula (I).
- the surfactant contains a high proportion, in particular at least 50%, more usually at least 60% and especially at least 65%, of the surfactant is of the formula R 1 - (OA) n -O-P-(O)(OH) 2 where R 1 , A and n are as defined in formula (I) i.e. a phosphate ester having one unsaturated alcohol residue.
- the anionic group can be introduced into the molecule by methods generally known in the art. Usually these are by reaction of a compound R 1 -O-(OA) n -OH with suitable reactive anionic compounds.
- suitable reactive anionic compounds for example, compounds where X is phosphate or ester phosphate can be made by reaction of a compound R 1 -O-(OA) n -OH with polyphosphoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, oxychloride or trichloride. The reaction produces a statistical mixture of mono-, di- and tri-ester products and the proportions can be controlled to increase the proportion of the desired compound by varying the proportions of the starting materials.
- the salt forming moiety when present, can be alkali metal, particularly Li, Na or K. ammonium, including amine or hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, onium, or amine, particularly alkylamine, especially tertiary alkylamine and hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, especially tertiary alkanolamine such as triethanolamine.
- Salts can generally be made from free acid precursors by direct reaction with an appropriate base.
- the oxyalkylene group OA is usually a group of the formula: -(OC m H 2m )- where m is typically 2, 3 or 4, desirably 2 or 3, i.e. an oxyethylene or oxypropylene group.
- the polyoxyalkylene chain may be wholly of oxyethylene residues or, less generally desirably, wholly of oxypropylene residues, or it may include both oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues to give a random or block copolymer chain. Generally, it is desirable that the chain is a homopolymeric polyoxyethylene chain.
- n will generally be chosen to provide the desired properties in the intended product.
- the polyoxyalkylene chain is a polyoxyethylene chain it will have 2 to 60, usually 5 to 30 oxyethylene residues and where it is a polyoxypropylene chain it will usually have 2 to 30 oxypropylene residues.
- the chain is a block or random copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues the chain length chosen will typically correspond to the above ranges but numerically according to the proportion of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues in the chain.
- oxyethylene residues will provide at least 60 mole% of the total oxyalkylene residues.
- Oxybutylene residues can be included in the chain, but when present these will usually be present as a minor component of the chain e.g. up to about 20 mole% of the total polyoxyalkylene chain.
- the ethylenically unsaturated monomers that can be polymerised include unsaturated carboxylic acids and their alkyl esters, amides, N-substituted amides and nitriles, aromatic vinyl compounds, diene compounds which may be included as monomers or specifically as crosslinking agents, vinylethers, vinylesters, olefines and hydrophobic allyl compounds.
- Unsaturated carboxylic acids and their derivatives include acrylic species including alpha alkyl, especially methyl species, such as (meth)acrylic acid and (meth)acrylate esters including alkyl and hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylates, such as methyl methacrylate and vinyl (meth)acrylate; acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile; and water insoluble (meth)acrylamides such as acrylamide, N-iso propylacrylamide and N -methylol(meth)acrylamide; including cationic and quaternary species: alkanediol (meth)acrylates such as (poly)ethyleneglycol di(meth)acrylates and methoxypolyethyleneglycol (meth)acrylates, urethane acrylates and epoxy acrylates; fumaric acid, maleic acid and anhydride and itaconic acid and their esters, particularly dialkyl maleates, dialkyl fumarates, dialkyl itaconates, amides and im
- Vinylic species include halides such as vinyl halides, especially vinyl chloride, and vinylidene halides, especially vinylidene chloride, vinyl esters such as vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher linear and branched acid esters, vinyl ethers.
- Aromatic vinyl compounds include styrene, ⁇ -methylstyrene and p-tert -butylstyrene and vinyl pyridines.
- Other ethylenically unsaturated monomers include olefins particulary ⁇ -olefines such as ethylene, propylene and butene and diene compounds include butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene chloroprene and divinylbenzene.
- the polymerisation can be carried out to make homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubbers and chlorinated polymers such as polychloroprene.
- homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-
- the invention is particularly applicable to the manufacture of acrylic copolymers, for example those where at least 50%, more usually at least 60%, desirably at least 60% e.g. 90% or more up to 100%, by weight of the monomers are acrylic monomers.
- the method carried out using acrylic monomers forms a specific aspect of the invention.
- the acrylic polymers may be those based on mixed alkyl acrylates, especially where the predominant monomer is methyl methacrylate, which copolymers may include anionic units such as (meth)acrylic acid units or cationic units such as amino substituted ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as allyl amine and diallyldimethylammonium chloride.
- the amount of surfactant used will depend on the particular monomers used and the polymerisation system used, the degree of colloidal stability needed and the desired particle size of the polymer in the product latex. However, for an otherwise conventional water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation, to give a latex having a particle size of from 80 to 500 nm the amount of surfactant used will typically be from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer (phm). More usually the amount will be from 0.5 to 2.5 phm, particularly from 1 to 2 phm.
- the concentration of monomer is typically substantially lower than in conventional emulsion or other dispersion polymerisation systems e.g. from 3 to 10% by weight.
- the proportion of surfactant relative to the amount of monomer is also relatively high because the microemulsion has higher interface area per unit mass of monomer corresponding to the smaller emulsion particle size.
- Typical surfactant levels can be from 10 to 150 phm.
- Overall the solids content of microemulsion systems are usually in the range is to 30% by weight of the total emulsion.
- the polymerisation catalyst in the process in general may be any conventional free radical polymerisation initiator for ethylenically unsaturated systems and In particular for emulsion polymerisation systems.
- examples include peroxidic compounds such as inorganic per-compounds e.g. potassium persulphate, and organic per-compounds e.g. tertiary butyl hydroperoxide and other free radical generators such as 2,2'-azobis iso butyronitrile.
- the proportion of catalyst used will typically be from 0.001 to 10% by weight, end more usually from 0.01 to 7%, based on the total monomer.
- the proportion of reducing agent is typically from 0.05 to 100 mole%, more usually 0.1 to 80%, based on the molar amount of polymerisation initiator.
- additives in the reaction system can include chain transfer agents, such as alkyl mercaptans and similar acting compounds typically included at from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; crosslinking agents, such as divinylbenzene or ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, typically used to modify the product polymer molecular weight, at typical concentrations of from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; water soluble polymers e.g.
- the polymerisation reaction can be carried out using generally conventional procedures typically at temperatures in the range from ambient temperature to 100°C, usually 60 to 100°C. desirably from 70 to 95°C e.g. commonly about 85°C. It is an advantage of the surfactants of the formula (I) used in this invention that they are effective at such elevated temperatures.
- the polymerisation process of this invention can be carried out over a wide pH range for example 3 to 11, particularly 4 to 10, but more usually at moderately acid pH e.g. 3 to 6, especially 4 to 5.
- the resultant polymer latices may be neutralised, typically to a pH of 7 to 10 using organic bases e.g. amines or alkanolamines, or inorganic bases e.g. alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates.
- Polymerisation reactions can be carried out in a dosed kettle equipped with heating and cooling devices, agitation, thermometer, condenser and inlets for inert gas, monomers and initiator streams. All formulation ingredients can be charged to the reactor from the start in what is known in the art as a batch process. The preferred production process used when working with compounds of the present invention is a semi continuous mode. Part of the ingredients are charged to the reactor, the rest is gradually fed into the reactor in single of multiple feed streams. Monomers are fed as a neat monomer stream, or are mixed into a part of the water with a part of the surfactants and optionally other additives to form a pre-emulsion. Monomer composition can change during the feed stage to control particle morphology.
- the latices synthesised by the method of this invention have lower levels of free surfactant species than products made using conventional surfactants that are not non-migratory. This yields end-products that can have improved resistance to water, higher colloidal stability, show better adhesion to substrates and other advantages related to reduced levels of free surfactant.
- the product polymers obtained by the method of this invention can be used as binders or film formers in interior and exterior architectural coatings, floor coatings, paper and paperboard coatings, coatings for metal protection, waterborne adhesives, inks, binders for non-woven fabrics, concrete and cement additives.
- Latices can be formulated as such in formulations where water is the carrier, or the polymer can be separated from the aqueous phase by flocculation, spray drying or other know techniques.
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 12-ethoxylate CS1 (400 g; MW 719.2 - calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate; 0.56 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 1 litre 4-necked round bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, nitrogen blanket adaptor, thermometer, heating mantle and a 500 ml stoppered Kontes powder addition funnel containing powdered P 2 O 5 (39.5 g; 0.28 mole).
- the Kontes funnel included a grooved PTFE auger shaft in the outlet tube to control addition of the powder and a small bore tube and with tap to equalise pressure around the main addition tap.
- the CS1 was heated to 75°C under stirring at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz).
- the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 1.5 hours and then cooled to 100°C.
- Water (21.6 g) was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature.
- the results of NMR analysis are set out in the Table below.
- the calculated molecular weight of the product using the mono/di-ester ratio from the NMR analysis was 1065.
- the phosphoric acid ester was neutralised using ammonia (25%; ca 13% by weight based on the product) and the mixture further diluted with demineralised water to give a 10% by weight active surfactant solution with a pH of 6.8, after equilibrating overnight.
- This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S1.
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate CS1 (143.8 g; MW 719.2; 0.2 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a flask set up as described above for making the mono-phosphate.
- the alcohol was dewatered under vacuum (7 mm Hg: ca 130 Pa) for 1 hour under stirring (400 rpm; ca 6.7 Hz), the vacuum was released and the mixture cooled to 70°C.
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 20-ethoxylate (341 g; 0.326 mole - based on a MW of 1049 calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 500 ml round bottom flask equipped with a pressure equalised dropping funnel, agitator, nitrogen blanket adaptor (0.2 ml nitrogen per minute through the flask during the reaction), thermometer, thermostatically controlled heating mantle and a horizontal condenser to a receiver.
- the ethoxylate was heated to 80°C to melt it and then polyphosphoric acid (technical grade - 84.53 % P 2 O 5 .
- Batch polymersations were carried out at low solids (10%) to simulate the conditions during the seed stage of a semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation to provide an evaluation of surfactant efficiency during particle nucleation.
- Batch recipe Material (parts by wt) Monomers: (%by wt) 100 8A 48.8 MMA 49.9 MAA 1.3 Potassium Peroxidisulphate 0.3 Sodium bicarbonate 0.1 Water 15 S1 variable* Water to 1000 * the differing concentrations of S1 were expressed as phm (parts per 100 parts monomer)
- the Z-average particle size of the polymer particles was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer 4 (photon correlation spectroscopy) with the detector at 90°.
- Z-averaga article size Run No S1 amount size (phm) (nm) 1.1 0.5 86.4 12 0.9 76.8 1.3 1.6 61.2 1.4 2 61.2
- BA/MMA/MAA 48.8/49.9/1.3 by wt latices at 45% solids were made by semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation. Two were made using surfactant S (Runs 1 and 2) and one, for comparison, using surfactant CS1 (Run 3).
- the surfactant concentration in the starting emulsion was chosen to give a desired number of particles in the initial polymerisation stage (when using surfactant S1) so as to yield a final latex particle size of 150 nm.
- the level was calculated from the amount of surfactant used and final particle size distribution in Example 1.
- the total surfactant concentration was varied from 1.05 to 1.81 phm.
- the reactor was a jacketed 2 litre 4 necked round bottom glass flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermometer, condenser and supplementary inlets for nitrogen and feed streams.
- Example 1 The batch poly described in Example 1 was re-run using various amount of surfactant S4 instead of the surfactant S1 used in Example 1.
- the Z-average particle size (in nm) of the latices was measured and the results are set out in the table below: amount of surfactant (phm) 0.5 0.9 1.6 2 5 10 neutralised S4 86.4 76.8 61,2 61.2 non-neutralised S4 73.9 65.1 47.7
- Example 2 Four co-polymer acrylic latices were made by the general semi-continuous method described In Example 2 using anionic surfactant S4.
- the target latex polymer particle size was 150 nm, the latex polymer solid yield 450 g, the target number of polymer particles 2.3.10 17 , and the monomers used were butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid at base ratios of BA/MMA/MAA of 48.8/49.9/1.3.
- the overall percentage of MAA was reduced to 0.5%, with the amounts of BA and MMA adjusted to compensate keeping the ratio of BA to MMA constant.
- the proportions used are included In Table 1, Latex Particle Size.
- Example 4 Runs similar to Example 4 were carried out using anionic surfactant S4 at 0.33 phm in the starting emulsion (1) and S5 (Example 5) and S6 (Example 6) In the main monomer feed (3).
- the proportions used are Included In Table 1. Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given In Table 3.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
- Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
- Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
- Paints Or Removers (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Adhesives Or Adhesive Processes (AREA)
Description
- This invention relates to the free radical initiated addition polymerisation of unsaturated monomers in the presence of surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
-
PCT published Application No WO 91 13849 A -
BE-A 630 043 -
US-A-2 606 178 discloses a process of emulsion polymerising styrene using novel emulsifiers which are prepared by condensation of alkylene oxides with hydrocarbon acid or alcohols with subsequent sulfonation. -
EP-A-O 755 946 -
EP-A-O 026 932 -
WO99 07673 A1 - The present invention adopts a different approach to
WO/13849 A - Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including (i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I):
R1-(OA)n-X (I)
where - R1
- is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bonds;
- OA
- is an oxyalkylene group:
- n
- is from 2 to 60; and
- X
- is a phosphorus acid group or a salt thereof; and (ii) a nonionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor of the surfactant of formula (I).
- The method of this invention is particularly applicable to emulsion polymerisation, especially the oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of ethylenically unsaturated monomers. In particular, the method is applicable to the polymerisation of systems using or including acrylic monomers and/or vinyl monomers, particularly in oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation. These form particular aspects of the invention.
- The group R1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bonds. In particular it is a C18 or C20 unsaturated hydrocarbyl group such as an unsaturated alkyl group. Desirably, at least two of the double bonds are conjugated, and in particular the group R1 includes two double bonds and these double bonds are conjugated. Particularly desirable groups R1 are of the formula:
R2-(-CH=CH-CH=CH-)-R3- (II)
where - R2
- is a C1 to C8 alkyl group, particularly a group CH3-(CH2)l where l is from 0 to 7; and
- R3
- is a C4 to C12 alkylene group particularly a group (CH2)m where m is from 4 to 12.
- In this case the compound of the formula (I) is of the formula (Ia):
R2-(-CH=CH-CH=CH-)-R3-(OA)n-X (Ia)
where R2, R3, OA, n and X are as defined above. - The, desirably conjugated, double bond system is preferably not terminal in the overall hydrocarbyl group. In particular, referring to the formula (II), the group R2 desirably contributes chains of at least 2 carbon atoms, more usually at least 3 and preferably at least 4 carbon atoms to the overall hydrocarbyl chain; correspondingly I is desirably at least 2 and preferably at least 3. We have obtained good results when the group R1 is the residue of an alcohol, R1OH, which is desirably a conjugated isomer of linoleyl alcohol. These residues are residues of the formula (II) in which R2 is n-pentyl or n-hexyl (I = 4 or 5) and R3 is correspondingly n-nonyl or n-octyl (m = 9 or 8), derived from whichever of the two double bonds in linoleyl alcohol:
CH3(CH2)4.CH=CH.CH2.CH=CH.(CH2)7CH2OH moves to form a conjugated system. The residues can be derived from the corresponding alcohol which can be made by rearrangement e.g. under strong base catalysis, and the alcohol used in the synthesis of the surfactant or the residues can be made in situ by allowing the rearrangement to take place during surfactant synthesis e.g. under alkali catalysts during alkoxylation of linoleyl alcohol, When derived from linoleyl alcohol In this way the product will be a mixture of compounds with the two conjugated unsaturation patterns, typically containing approximately equal amounts of each compound. Other doubly unsaturated residues can be made from corresponding natural source materials by similar methods. Other potential double unsaturated derivatives include alkoxylates of abietyl alcohol (the alcohol derived from reduction of the carboxyl group in abletic acid; systematically named as 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10,10a-decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1-hydroxymethyl-phenanthrene). - Typically, when alcohols derived from natural sources are used, the doubly unsaturated material will be available in mixture with other similar compounds having different levels of unsaturation. Mixtures of doubly unsaturated alcohol residues with singly unsaturated residues and even proportions of saturated residues can be used. Generally It is desirable that the proportion of multiple, especially double, unsaturated R1 residues is at least 15 mole%, desirably at least 40 mole%, and preferably at least 50 mole%. Typical commercially available double unsaturated materials contain from 40 to 65 mole% commonly about 50%, double unsaturated residues. Such materials can be used satisfactorily in this invention. Materials having higher levels of double unsaturated residues may provide additional benefits but are significantly more expensive.
- Suitable phosphorus acid groups for group X include phosphate: -O-P-(O)(OH)2 and monoester phosphate -O-P-(O)(OR4)(OH), where R4 is an ester forming group, typically a group of the formula R1-O-(OA)n-, where R1, OA, and n are as defined above for formula (I) and is usually the same as the other group R1-O-(OA)n- defined in formula (I).
- When the anionic functionality is provided by a phosphorus acid group, it is generally desirable that the surfactant contains a high proportion, in particular at least 50%, more usually at least 60% and especially at least 65%, of the surfactant is of the formula R1 - (OA)n -O-P-(O)(OH)2 where R1, A and n are as defined in formula (I) i.e. a phosphate ester having one unsaturated alcohol residue.
- The anionic group can be introduced into the molecule by methods generally known in the art. Mostly these are by reaction of a compound R1-O-(OA)n-OH with suitable reactive anionic compounds. For example, compounds where X is phosphate or ester phosphate can be made by reaction of a compound R1-O-(OA)n-OH with polyphosphoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, oxychloride or trichloride. The reaction produces a statistical mixture of mono-, di- and tri-ester products and the proportions can be controlled to increase the proportion of the desired compound by varying the proportions of the starting materials.
- The salt forming moiety, when present, can be alkali metal, particularly Li, Na or K. ammonium, including amine or hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, onium, or amine, particularly alkylamine, especially tertiary alkylamine and hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, especially tertiary alkanolamine such as triethanolamine. Salts can generally be made from free acid precursors by direct reaction with an appropriate base.
- The oxyalkylene group OA is usually a group of the formula: -(OCmH2m)- where m is typically 2, 3 or 4, desirably 2 or 3, i.e. an oxyethylene or oxypropylene group. The polyoxyalkylene chain may be wholly of oxyethylene residues or, less generally desirably, wholly of oxypropylene residues, or it may include both oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues to give a random or block copolymer chain. Generally, it is desirable that the chain is a homopolymeric polyoxyethylene chain.
- The value of n will generally be chosen to provide the desired properties in the intended product. Where the polyoxyalkylene chain is a polyoxyethylene chain it will have 2 to 60, usually 5 to 30 oxyethylene residues and where it is a polyoxypropylene chain it will usually have 2 to 30 oxypropylene residues. Where the chain is a block or random copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues the chain length chosen will typically correspond to the above ranges but numerically according to the proportion of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues in the chain. In copolymer chains usually oxyethylene residues will provide at least 60 mole% of the total oxyalkylene residues. Oxybutylene residues can be included in the chain, but when present these will usually be present as a minor component of the chain e.g. up to about 20 mole% of the total polyoxyalkylene chain.
- Of course, numerical values of numbers of repeat units in the polyoxyalkylene chain are average values. As is common to surfactants containing a polyoxyalkylene chain, the higher the proportion of oxyethylene residues, and the longer the polyoxyethylene chain, and the more hydrophilic the product.
- The ethylenically unsaturated monomers that can be polymerised include unsaturated carboxylic acids and their alkyl esters, amides, N-substituted amides and nitriles, aromatic vinyl compounds, diene compounds which may be included as monomers or specifically as crosslinking agents, vinylethers, vinylesters, olefines and hydrophobic allyl compounds.
- Unsaturated carboxylic acids and their derivatives include acrylic species including alpha alkyl, especially methyl species, such as (meth)acrylic acid and (meth)acrylate esters including alkyl and hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylates, such as methyl methacrylate and vinyl (meth)acrylate; acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile; and water insoluble (meth)acrylamides such as acrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide and N-methylol(meth)acrylamide; including cationic and quaternary species: alkanediol (meth)acrylates such as (poly)ethyleneglycol di(meth)acrylates and methoxypolyethyleneglycol (meth)acrylates, urethane acrylates and epoxy acrylates; fumaric acid, maleic acid and anhydride and itaconic acid and their esters, particularly dialkyl maleates, dialkyl fumarates, dialkyl itaconates, amides and imides.
- Vinylic species include halides such as vinyl halides, especially vinyl chloride, and vinylidene halides, especially vinylidene chloride, vinyl esters such as vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher linear and branched acid esters, vinyl ethers. Aromatic vinyl compounds include styrene, α-methylstyrene and p-tert-butylstyrene and vinyl pyridines. Other ethylenically unsaturated monomers include olefins particulary α-olefines such as ethylene, propylene and butene and diene compounds include butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene chloroprene and divinylbenzene.
- The polymerisation can be carried out to make homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubbers and chlorinated polymers such as polychloroprene.
- The invention is particularly applicable to the manufacture of acrylic copolymers, for example those where at least 50%, more usually at least 60%, desirably at least 60% e.g. 90% or more up to 100%, by weight of the monomers are acrylic monomers. The method carried out using acrylic monomers forms a specific aspect of the invention. The acrylic polymers may be those based on mixed alkyl acrylates, especially where the predominant monomer is methyl methacrylate, which copolymers may include anionic units such as (meth)acrylic acid units or cationic units such as amino substituted ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as allyl amine and diallyldimethylammonium chloride.
- The amount of surfactant used will depend on the particular monomers used and the polymerisation system used, the degree of colloidal stability needed and the desired particle size of the polymer in the product latex. However, for an otherwise conventional water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation, to give a latex having a particle size of from 80 to 500 nm the amount of surfactant used will typically be from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer (phm). More usually the amount will be from 0.5 to 2.5 phm, particularly from 1 to 2 phm.
- In microemulsion polymerisation systems, the concentration of monomer is typically substantially lower than in conventional emulsion or other dispersion polymerisation systems e.g. from 3 to 10% by weight. The proportion of surfactant relative to the amount of monomer is also relatively high because the microemulsion has higher interface area per unit mass of monomer corresponding to the smaller emulsion particle size. Typical surfactant levels can be from 10 to 150 phm. Overall the solids content of microemulsion systems are usually in the range is to 30% by weight of the total emulsion.
- Mixtures of the compounds of the formula (I) with the non-ionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor are used as the surfactant emulsifiers in the polymerisation process of this invention, particularly to tallor the properties of the end product polymer. If desired minor amounts of conventional anionic, cationic or non-ionic surfactants may be used. In this context, the presence of 'conventional' materials derived from components of R1 [in formula (I)] in the synthetic raw materials which do not have multiple unsaturation is not considered as adding conventional surfactants.
- The polymerisation catalyst in the process in general may be any conventional free radical polymerisation initiator for ethylenically unsaturated systems and In particular for emulsion polymerisation systems. Examples include peroxidic compounds such as inorganic per-compounds e.g. potassium persulphate, and organic per-compounds e.g. tertiary butyl hydroperoxide and other free radical generators such as 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile. The proportion of catalyst used will typically be from 0.001 to 10% by weight, end more usually from 0.01 to 7%, based on the total monomer. When a redox couple is used as the initiator, the proportion of reducing agent is typically from 0.05 to 100 mole%, more usually 0.1 to 80%, based on the molar amount of polymerisation initiator.
- Other additives in the reaction system can include chain transfer agents, such as alkyl mercaptans and similar acting compounds typically included at from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; crosslinking agents, such as divinylbenzene or ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, typically used to modify the product polymer molecular weight, at typical concentrations of from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; water soluble polymers e.g. hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethyleneglycol and partially hydrolysed polyvinylacetate, typically used to modify the viscosity of the system, included at concentrations from 0 to 10 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 2 phm; buffers for pH control, sequestering agents, electrolytes and organic solvents in minor amounts totalling typically from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 3 phm.
- The polymerisation reaction can be carried out using generally conventional procedures typically at temperatures in the range from ambient temperature to 100°C, usually 60 to 100°C. desirably from 70 to 95°C e.g. commonly about 85°C. It is an advantage of the surfactants of the formula (I) used in this invention that they are effective at such elevated temperatures.
- The polymerisation process of this invention, particularly as an emulsion, especially an oil-in-water emulsion, polymerisation, can be carried out over a wide pH range for example 3 to 11, particularly 4 to 10, but more usually at moderately acid pH e.g. 3 to 6, especially 4 to 5. After completion of polymerisation, the resultant polymer latices may be neutralised, typically to a pH of 7 to 10 using organic bases e.g. amines or alkanolamines, or inorganic bases e.g. alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates.
- Polymerisation reactions can be carried out in a dosed kettle equipped with heating and cooling devices, agitation, thermometer, condenser and inlets for inert gas, monomers and initiator streams. All formulation ingredients can be charged to the reactor from the start in what is known in the art as a batch process. The preferred production process used when working with compounds of the present invention is a semi continuous mode. Part of the ingredients are charged to the reactor, the rest is gradually fed into the reactor in single of multiple feed streams. Monomers are fed as a neat monomer stream, or are mixed into a part of the water with a part of the surfactants and optionally other additives to form a pre-emulsion. Monomer composition can change during the feed stage to control particle morphology.
- The latices synthesised by the method of this invention have lower levels of free surfactant species than products made using conventional surfactants that are not non-migratory. This yields end-products that can have improved resistance to water, higher colloidal stability, show better adhesion to substrates and other advantages related to reduced levels of free surfactant.
- The product polymers obtained by the method of this invention can be used as binders or film formers in interior and exterior architectural coatings, floor coatings, paper and paperboard coatings, coatings for metal protection, waterborne adhesives, inks, binders for non-woven fabrics, concrete and cement additives. Latices can be formulated as such in formulations where water is the carrier, or the polymer can be separated from the aqueous phase by flocculation, spray drying or other know techniques.
- The following Examples illustrate the invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
-
- CS1
- 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate made as described in WO91/13849 A (based on Ocenol 110/130 linoleyl alcohol with an iodine value from 110 to 130) The following products were made from CS1 as described below:
- S1
- neutralised mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 10-ethoxylate.
- S2
- neutralised di-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 10-ethoxylate.
- S3
- mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 6-ethoxylete.
- S4
- mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate.
- S5
- mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 20-ethoxylate.
- S6
- mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 30-ethoxylate.
- KPS
- potassium persulphate free radical polymerisation initiator
-
- Viscosity - was measured with a Brookfield RV viscometer using spindle 4 at a speed of 100 rpm (ca 1.7 Hz). Results are given as "Visc" in mPa.s
- Surface Tension - was measured by the Wilhelmy Plate method with results as "ST" in mN/m.
- Particle size - was measured with a Malvern Zetasizer. The Z-average particle size is given as "Z-Ave" in nm and volume average particle size as V-ave in nm.
- wet grit - was measured by filtration of latex through a sieve with the result given as the weight % of wet grit based on total latex solids - sieves of 240µm and 80µm were used.
- Foaming - was measured using the Ross Miles foam test on 0.5% by weight aqueous surfactant solutions or on the latex diluted to 5% solids end results are given as RM Foam Height after 0, 5 and 10 minutes.
- Shear Stability - was assessed by subjecting the latex to high shear stirring using a slotted circular paddle stirrer with vertical peripheral extensions at ca 3000 rpm (50 Hz).
- Freeze Thaw Stability (FT Stab) - was assessed as the number of 24 hour cycles between -20°C and 23°C (12 hours at each temperature that the neutralised test latex withstands without breaking.
- Water Spotting (Spot) - was assessed by placing a spat of water on a film made using the latex and ranking the extent to which the film is whitened; 0 = template film whitening and 10 = film unaffected. For comparison a film made from a latex polymerised using (saturated) stearyl alcohol 10-ethoxylate mono-phosphate as the surfactant scores 1 on this test.
- Contact angle (degrees) - was measured at 1, 5 and 11 minutes after placing a drop of water on a latex film of 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40" for 7 days.
- Bloom - was measured by immersing a latex film, 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40°, in water and measuring the % haze initially (OH), after 2 hours (2H), 1 day (1D) and 1 week (1W) immersion.
- Water uptake (%) was measured by immersing a latex film, 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40°, in water and measuring the % water uptake after 1 day (1D). 5 days (5D) and 2 weeks (2W) immersion.
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 12-ethoxylate CS1 (400 g; MW 719.2 - calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate; 0.56 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 1 litre 4-necked round bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, nitrogen blanket adaptor, thermometer, heating mantle and a 500 ml stoppered Kontes powder addition funnel containing powdered P2O5 (39.5 g; 0.28 mole). The Kontes funnel included a grooved PTFE auger shaft in the outlet tube to control addition of the powder and a small bore tube and with tap to equalise pressure around the main addition tap. The funnel outlet led towards the flask centre to minimise accumulation on the flask walls. The CS1 was heated to 75°C under stirring at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz). Water (3.6 g) was added to increase the total amount of water in the reaction medium to 1 mole and P2O5 was added stepwise through the Kontes funnel so that the reaction exotherm raised the temperature to a maximum of 100°C. After completion of the P2O5 addition, the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 1.5 hours and then cooled to 100°C. Water (21.6 g) was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature. The results of NMR analysis are set out in the Table below. The calculated molecular weight of the product using the mono/di-ester ratio from the NMR analysis was 1065. The phosphoric acid ester was neutralised using ammonia (25%; ca 13% by weight based on the product) and the mixture further diluted with demineralised water to give a 10% by weight active surfactant solution with a pH of 6.8, after equilibrating overnight. This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S1.
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate CS1 (143.8 g; MW 719.2; 0.2 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a flask set up as described above for making the mono-phosphate. The alcohol was dewatered under vacuum (7 mm Hg: ca 130 Pa) for 1 hour under stirring (400 rpm; ca 6.7 Hz), the vacuum was released and the mixture cooled to 70°C.
- P2O5 (8.5 g; 0.06 mole) was added stepwise through the Kontes funnel over a period of 25 minutes. The reaction mixture was then heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 3 hours and then cooled to 100°C. Water (9.0 g) was then to bring the total water content to 5% by weight the temperature held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and the mixture was then cooled to ambient temperature. The product was neutralised with ammonia (ca 7% by weight) and diluted generally as described for S1 and the resulting solution designated S2.
- The method described for making S1 was also used to make S3 and S4 containing 6 and 12 EO residues respectively but S5 and S6 containing 20 and 30 EO residues respectively the following method using polyphosphoric acid rather than phosphorus pentoxide was used:
- Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 20-ethoxylate (341 g; 0.326 mole - based on a MW of 1049 calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 500 ml round bottom flask equipped with a pressure equalised dropping funnel, agitator, nitrogen blanket adaptor (0.2 ml nitrogen per minute through the flask during the reaction), thermometer, thermostatically controlled heating mantle and a horizontal condenser to a receiver. The ethoxylate was heated to 80°C to melt it and then polyphosphoric acid (technical grade - 84.53 % P2O5. 42.0 g; equivalent to 0.25 mole P2O5) was gradually added keeping the temperature in the range 80 to 100°C. After completion of the polyphosphoric acid addition, the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 3 hours and then cooled to 90 to 100°C. Water was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture hold at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature. This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S6. Surfactant S7 was made by a similar process but substituting conjugated linoleyl alcohol 30-ethoxylate for the 20-ethoxylate material.
- Analysis data on anionic surfactants made by the methods described above and their properties are summarised in the table below:
Analysis (% by wt) Code EO No H3PO4 Mono Di Tri Poly Pyro Free Alcohol S1 10 2.2 62 32 1.6 0.1 2.5 S2 10 0.4 36 60 ND 0.2 4.3 S3 6 3 67 27 ND <0.1 3 S4 12 2.7 69 24 ND 0.1 4.2 S5 20 5.6 75 14 ND 0.1 5.5 S6 30 4.6 79 15 ND 0.4 1.9 - Surface Tension (given against Log[surfactant concentration in wt%]) and RM Foam Height at 0.5% surfactant in water for anionic surfactant S4:
Surface Tension RM Foam Height Surfactant 0 -1 -2 -3.3 0 5 10 S3 3 2.5 2 S4 34.3 36.5 38.2 49.2 12 11.8 10.3 S5 40.0 40.8 44.0 47.0 10.8 7 6 - Batch polymersations were carried out at low solids (10%) to simulate the conditions during the seed stage of a semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation to provide an evaluation of surfactant efficiency during particle nucleation.
Batch recipe Material (parts by wt) Monomers: (%by wt) 100 8A 48.8 MMA 49.9 MAA 1.3 Potassium Peroxidisulphate 0.3 Sodium bicarbonate 0.1 Water 15 S1 variable* Water to 1000 * the differing concentrations of S1 were expressed as phm (parts per 100 parts monomer) - The Z-average particle size of the polymer particles was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer 4 (photon correlation spectroscopy) with the detector at 90°.
Z-averaga article size Run No S1 amount size (phm) (nm) 1.1 0.5 86.4 12 0.9 76.8 1.3 1.6 61.2 1.4 2 61.2 - Three BA/MMA/MAA (48.8/49.9/1.3 by wt) latices at 45% solids were made by semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation. Two were made using surfactant S (Runs 1 and 2) and one, for comparison, using surfactant CS1 (Run 3). The surfactant concentration in the starting emulsion was chosen to give a desired number of particles in the initial polymerisation stage (when using surfactant S1) so as to yield a final latex particle size of 150 nm. The level was calculated from the amount of surfactant used and final particle size distribution in Example 1. The total surfactant concentration was varied from 1.05 to 1.81 phm.
-
For each run four feed mixtures were made up: Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 1 Starting emulsion Water 510.9 510.8 510.9 Monomers 61.1 81.1 61.1 Surfactant solution (10%) 9.8 9.8 9.8 2 Start initiator KPS 0.2 0.2 0.2 Na bicarbonate 0.06 0.06 0.06 Water 20 20 20 3 Main monomer feed Monomers 838.9 838.9 838.9 Surfactant solution (10%) 153.1 85 153.1 Water 343.7 411.8 343.7 4 Feed initiator KPS 1.7 1.7 1.7 Na bicarbonate 0.6 0.6 0.6 Water 60 60 60 Total 2000 2000 2000 - The reactor was a jacketed 2 litre 4 necked round bottom glass flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermometer, condenser and supplementary inlets for nitrogen and feed streams.
- 1 the monomer pre-emulsion was made up by emulsifying the monomer phase in a mixture of the surfactant solution and Water under stirring with a paddle stirrer at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz)
- 2 the starting emulsion was made in the reactor by charging the water, surfactant and part of the monomer, at a surfactant level to give about 2.3 x 1017 polymer particles.
- 3 the reactor was heated to 85°C under stirring and the first part of the initiator was added and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 minutes under a nitrogen blanket
- 4 the remainder of the monomer emulsion and initiator feed were fed to the reactor simultaneously in two separate streams over a period of three hours
- 5 the reactor was kept at polymerisation temperature for a further 90 minutes, then cooled to 30°C
- 6 the product emulsion was filtered sequentially through filters with pore sizes of 240µm and 80µm and then stored in a bottle.
- These data show that the non-lonic ethoxylated 'conjugated Ilnoleyl alcohol' surfactant CS1 was not efficient during the particle nucleation stage of polymerisation using normal amounts of surfactant. The product latices made using the phosphate ester surfactant S1, as well as providing efficient action during particle nucleation, showed better stability during polymerisation resulting in lower levels of macrogrit and coagulum. The latex stabilised with CS1 sedimented after storage over a week end, probably because of its large particle size. No attempt was made to redisperse the sedimented layer prior to sampling for particle size analysis and for this reason, the microgrit level was not determined.
- The batch poly described in Example 1 was re-run using various amount of surfactant S4 instead of the surfactant S1 used in Example 1. The Z-average particle size (in nm) of the latices was measured and the results are set out in the table below:
amount of surfactant (phm) 0.5 0.9 1.6 2 5 10 neutralised S4 86.4 76.8 61,2 61.2 non-neutralised S4 73.9 65.1 47.7 NPE6* 101.1 * NPE6 is a conventional nonylphenol 6-ethoxylate phosphate surfactant. - These data indicate that even when not neutralised, surfactant S4 is more efficient than the conventional anionic surfactant in emulsifiying the monomer. Further data are given in Tables 1, 2 and 3 below.
- Four co-polymer acrylic latices were made by the general semi-continuous method described In Example 2 using anionic surfactant S4. The target latex polymer particle size was 150 nm, the latex polymer solid yield 450 g, the target number of polymer particles 2.3.1017, and the monomers used were butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid at base ratios of BA/MMA/MAA of 48.8/49.9/1.3. For some runs, the overall percentage of MAA was reduced to 0.5%, with the amounts of BA and MMA adjusted to compensate keeping the ratio of BA to MMA constant. The proportions used are included In Table 1, Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given in Table 3. For each run four feed mixtures were made up:
4a 4b 4c 4d 1 Starting emulsion Water 236.3 236.3 236.3 236.3 Monomers 29.8 29.8 29.8 29.8 Surfactant solution (20%) 7.45 7.45 7.45 7.45 2 Start initiator KPS 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 Na bicarbonate 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 Water 10 10 10 10 3 Main monomer feed Monomers 420.2 420.2 420.2 420.2 Surfactant solution (10%) 28.4 49.4 71.5 49.4 Water 225.6 201.7 180.45 202.5 4 Feed initiator KPS 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Na bicarbonate 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.4 Water 30 30 30 30 t-butyl hydroperoxide (70%) in 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 water 5 5 5 5 Na formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Water 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Total 1000 1000 1000 1000 - Runs similar to Example 4 were carried out using anionic surfactant S4 at 0.33 phm in the starting emulsion (1) and S5 (Example 5) and S6 (Example 6) In the main monomer feed (3). The proportions used are Included In Table 1. Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given In Table 3.
Table 1 - Process Variables and Latex Properties Ex No MAA Surf. Z-ave pH S T wet grit Vise RM Foam Height (%) (phm) (nm) (mN/m) (%) (mPa.s) 0 5 10 3a 1.3 1.5 141.3 110 4.5 2 0.5 3b 1.3 2.5 143.7 2.8 130 7.5 8.5 6 3c 0.5 2.5 144.2 2.8 110 9 9 5 4a 1.3 1.5 142.4 6.02 0.01 60 3 0.5 4b 1.3 2.5 143.1 3.15 46.8 0.02 90 9.9 9.5 9 4c 1.3 3.5 145.8 2.75 48.2 0.02 130 10.8 9 5.5 4d 0.5 2.5 145.3 3.66 44.4 0.04 90 10 5.6 4 5a 1.3 1.5 140.1 2.8 0.04 6 2 1.5 5b 1.3 2.5 142.5 2.7 0.01 80 7.5 5 3.5 5c 0.5 2.5 143.2 2.9 0.4 100 6a 1.3 1.5 142.9 3.6 0.23 65 3.5 0.5 0.5 6b 1.3 2.5 143.7 3.4 130 4 3.5 3.5 6c 0.5 2.5 141 3.7 0.02 120 5.5 3.5 1.5 Table 2 - Latex Testing Particle Size, Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability (FT Stab) Ex No non-neutr latex Shear Stab FT Stab neutr Z-ave Vol-ave Z-ave Vol-ave (nm) (nm) (nm) (nm) 3a 141.3 137.6 146.7 139.5 3b 143.7 138.4 143.4 132 5 3c 144.2 133.3 144.5 132.3 - 4a 142.4 127.1 - - 5 4b 143.1 135.2 142.7 135.9 5 4c 145.8 141.1 144.4 136.4 5 4d 145.3 136.5 - - - 5a 140.1 131.2 - - 5 5b 142.5 130.5 170 155 5 5c 143.2 136.6 - - - 6a 142.9 135.6 - - 1 6b 143.7 139.2 145.5 129 5 6c 141 131.5 - - - Table 3 Latex film water resistance Testing Ex spot No Contact angle Bloom (% Haze) Water Uptake (wt%) 1 min 5 min 11 min 0H 2H 1D 1W 1D 5D 2W 3a 0.9 2.6 13.3 17 8 13 18 3b 66 63 55 1.9 2.8 6.8 15.5 8 24 25 3c 66 63 55 0.7 2.3 12 20.7 15 20 33 4a 6 63 62 0.5 2.1 9.2 24.9 10 15 15 4b 6 62 62 0.6 1.8 6.8 20.4 10 17 22 4c 65 58 0.6 3.1 18 66.5 10 70 4d 6 65 59 1.3 3.2 8 22.7 11 13 19 5a 71 65 58 0.3 2.6 13.2 34.9 6 13 5b 62 57 50 0.3 3.8 22.5 64 14 24 5c 64 56 49 0.9 6.1 35.2 77.2 12 20 6a 73 72 68 0.5 25 54.4 11 16 24 6b 77 71 64 0.7 4.3 22.4 47.2 13 23 32 6c 69 64 57 0.4 8.6 48,5 82 12 21 36
Example 2 Semi-continuous polymerisation | Results | ||
Run1 | Run2 | Run3 | |
Grit >240µm (g; wet weighed) | 0 | 0.13 | 18.5 |
Grit 80 - 240µm (g; wet weighed) | 1.7 | 1.6 | n.d. |
Coagulum (g; wet weighed) | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Volume average particle size (µm) | 146.6 | 144.6 | 421.9/706.6* |
* multimodal distribution |
Claims (14)
- A method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including(i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I):
R1-(OA)n-X
whereR1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bondsOA is an oxyalkylene groupn is from 2 to 60; andX is a phosphorus acid group or a salt thereof; and(ii) a non-ionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor of the surfactant of formula (1) - A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the group R1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including two double bonds which are conjugated.
- A method as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2 in which the compound of formula (I) is present in a mixture with similar compounds but where the residue corresponding to R1 contains fewer than two double bonds and in which the proportion of multiple unsaturated R1 residues is at least 15 mole %.
- A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the proportion of multiple unsaturated R1 residues is at least 40 mole%.
- A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the group X is a phosphate, O-P-(O)(OH)2 group or a salt thereof.
- A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein at least 60% of the surfactant has the group X as a phosphate, O-P-(O)(OH)2 group or a salt thereof.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the group OA is an oxymethylene group and n is from 5 to 30.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s) is or includes at least one acrylic monomer.
- A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the acrylic monomer(s) represent at least 50% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s).
- A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the acrylic monomer(s) represent at least 75% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s).
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein the amount of anionic surfactant used is from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 1 wherein the temperature of the polymerisation reaction is from 60 to 100°C.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the non-ionic unsaturated alcohol alkoxylated precursor of the surfactant of formula (I) is added to tailor the properties of the end product polymer.
- A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein the end product polymer is a homopolymer such as poly(vinyl acetate), polystyrene and poly (methyl methacrylate), or a copolymer such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, acrylic copolymer and styrene/acrylic copolymer, styrene-butadiene rubber and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubber and chlorinated polymer such as polychloroprene.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB9726890 | 1997-12-20 | ||
GBGB9726890.8A GB9726890D0 (en) | 1997-12-20 | 1997-12-20 | Polymerisation method |
PCT/GB1998/003829 WO1999032522A1 (en) | 1997-12-20 | 1998-12-18 | Polymerisation method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1042370A1 EP1042370A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 |
EP1042370B1 true EP1042370B1 (en) | 2008-02-13 |
Family
ID=10823917
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP98962559A Expired - Lifetime EP1042370B1 (en) | 1997-12-20 | 1998-12-18 | Polymerisation method |
Country Status (24)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6878763B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1042370B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4271849B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR100512224B1 (en) |
CN (3) | CN1285849A (en) |
AR (1) | AR017441A1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE386058T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU1769499A (en) |
BR (1) | BR9813734A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2313102C (en) |
CO (1) | CO5050311A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69839129T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1042370T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2299222T3 (en) |
GB (1) | GB9726890D0 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1045848A1 (en) |
HU (1) | HUP0100291A3 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA00006031A (en) |
MY (1) | MY148147A (en) |
NO (1) | NO20003168L (en) |
NZ (1) | NZ504985A (en) |
PL (1) | PL194315B1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW400336B (en) |
WO (1) | WO1999032522A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB0101771D0 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2001-03-07 | Ici Plc | Anionic surfactants |
CA2559129A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-15 | Kaneka Corporation | Method for manufacturing coagulated particles from latex prepared by emulsion polymerization |
US20060199877A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-07 | Sivapackia Ganapathiappan | Shear stable latex particles |
US7468412B2 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2008-12-23 | Geo Specialty Chemicals, Inc. | Method and composition for the suppression of bloom in peroxide crosslinked polymeric articles |
US8252425B2 (en) * | 2007-12-12 | 2012-08-28 | Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc | Acrylic emulsion pressure sensitive adhesive composition |
GB2462105A (en) | 2008-07-24 | 2010-01-27 | Nuplex Resins Bv | Thixotropic aqueous coating composition |
CN102268115B (en) * | 2010-06-02 | 2015-04-22 | 武汉强力荷新材料有限公司 | Heating-free technology for producing polymer emulsion |
KR101698054B1 (en) | 2014-12-30 | 2017-01-19 | 한국기술교육대학교 산학협력단 | Polymer film containing reactive latex molecule |
CN109310709A (en) * | 2015-12-30 | 2019-02-05 | 细胞基因公司 | T lymphocyte production method and resulting T lymphocyte |
US11795244B2 (en) | 2016-08-12 | 2023-10-24 | Dow Global Technologies Llc | Surfactant composition |
CN112410063B (en) * | 2019-08-22 | 2022-05-24 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Crude oil demulsifier and preparation method and application thereof |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2606178A (en) * | 1949-06-18 | 1952-08-05 | Monsanto Chemicals | Alkali sulfate salts of ethylene oxide condensation products as emulsifies for styrene polymerization |
BE630043A (en) * | 1962-08-28 | |||
CA1157598A (en) * | 1979-10-03 | 1983-11-22 | Paritosh M. Chakrabarti | Polyethyleneoxy sulfonate surfactants |
US4283321A (en) * | 1979-10-03 | 1981-08-11 | Gaf Corporation | Alkyl aryl ethyleneoxy sulfonate surfactants for vinyl acetate polymerization |
JP3592408B2 (en) * | 1995-07-25 | 2004-11-24 | 旭電化工業株式会社 | Surfactant, emulsifier for emulsion polymerization, dispersant for suspension polymerization and resin modifier |
AUPO846297A0 (en) | 1997-08-08 | 1997-09-04 | Ici Australia Operations Proprietary Limited | Anionic alkoxylate surfactant |
-
1997
- 1997-12-20 GB GBGB9726890.8A patent/GB9726890D0/en not_active Ceased
-
1998
- 1998-12-18 CN CN98813040A patent/CN1285849A/en active Pending
- 1998-12-18 KR KR10-2000-7006776A patent/KR100512224B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-18 PL PL98341282A patent/PL194315B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-18 MY MYPI98005729A patent/MY148147A/en unknown
- 1998-12-18 AT AT98962559T patent/ATE386058T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-18 BR BR9813734-4A patent/BR9813734A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-18 AU AU17694/99A patent/AU1769499A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-12-18 DK DK98962559T patent/DK1042370T3/en active
- 1998-12-18 HU HU0100291A patent/HUP0100291A3/en unknown
- 1998-12-18 CA CA002313102A patent/CA2313102C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-12-18 EP EP98962559A patent/EP1042370B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-12-18 JP JP2000525457A patent/JP4271849B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-12-18 CO CO98075437A patent/CO5050311A1/en unknown
- 1998-12-18 MX MXPA00006031A patent/MXPA00006031A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-18 DE DE69839129T patent/DE69839129T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-12-18 WO PCT/GB1998/003829 patent/WO1999032522A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-12-18 CN CNA2005100651840A patent/CN1667002A/en active Pending
- 1998-12-18 ES ES98962559T patent/ES2299222T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-12-18 NZ NZ504985A patent/NZ504985A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-12-21 AR ARP980106574A patent/AR017441A1/en active IP Right Grant
-
1999
- 1999-01-06 TW TW088100132A patent/TW400336B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2000
- 2000-06-19 NO NO20003168A patent/NO20003168L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2001
- 2001-09-10 CN CN01132937A patent/CN1346834A/en active Pending
-
2002
- 2002-04-17 US US10/123,527 patent/US6878763B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-09-26 HK HK02107073.3A patent/HK1045848A1/en unknown
-
2004
- 2004-04-15 US US10/824,644 patent/US20040225042A1/en not_active Abandoned
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
JP6104923B2 (en) | Freeze-thaw stability emulsion polymer and novel reactive surfactant for its coating | |
EP1069139A2 (en) | Aqueous polymer dispersion, its preparation and use | |
EP1042370B1 (en) | Polymerisation method | |
EP2144941B1 (en) | Polymer and use thereof | |
JPS58213002A (en) | Manufacture of sterically stabilized aqueous polymer dispersion | |
EP0102707B1 (en) | Process for production of sterically stabilised wholly non-charged aqueous polymer dispersions | |
JP6356121B2 (en) | Emulsion polymerization method | |
AU2006252219B2 (en) | Polymerisation method | |
JP2003212989A (en) | Olefinically unsaturated ether carboxylic acid and method for using the same in emulsion polymerization | |
KR100785987B1 (en) | Anionic surfactants | |
JPH10298210A (en) | Activator for emulsion polymerization and production of aqueous polymer by using it | |
DE19939266B4 (en) | Aqueous polymer dispersion, its preparation and use | |
JP2004331765A (en) | Phosphoric ester reactive surfactant | |
MXPA99007015A (en) | Improved emulsion polymerization process utilizing ethylenically unsaturated amine salts of sulfonic, phosphoric and carboxylic acids |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20000609 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
TPAD | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030530 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030530 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: CRODA INTERNATIONAL PLC |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69839129 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080327 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2299222 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080213 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080714 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20081114 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: CRODA INTERNATIONAL P.L.C. Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081218 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081218 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080514 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20081218 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20141219 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20141219 Year of fee payment: 17 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20141211 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20141219 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20151231 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151219 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20160101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160101 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20151218 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20171221 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20171211 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20171221 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20180123 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 69839129 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: PE20 Expiry date: 20181217 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20181217 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20200803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20181219 |