[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP1042370B1 - Polymerisation method - Google Patents

Polymerisation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1042370B1
EP1042370B1 EP98962559A EP98962559A EP1042370B1 EP 1042370 B1 EP1042370 B1 EP 1042370B1 EP 98962559 A EP98962559 A EP 98962559A EP 98962559 A EP98962559 A EP 98962559A EP 1042370 B1 EP1042370 B1 EP 1042370B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
group
surfactant
monomer
unsaturated
polymerisation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98962559A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1042370A1 (en
Inventor
Trevor Graham Blease
Johny Denis Grade
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Croda International PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10823917&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1042370(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Croda International PLC filed Critical Croda International PLC
Publication of EP1042370A1 publication Critical patent/EP1042370A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1042370B1 publication Critical patent/EP1042370B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08FMACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F2/00Processes of polymerisation
    • C08F2/12Polymerisation in non-solvents
    • C08F2/16Aqueous medium
    • C08F2/22Emulsion polymerisation
    • C08F2/24Emulsion polymerisation with the aid of emulsifying agents
    • C08F2/26Emulsion polymerisation with the aid of emulsifying agents anionic
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S526/00Synthetic resins or natural rubbers -- part of the class 520 series
    • Y10S526/911Emulsifying agents

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the free radical initiated addition polymerisation of unsaturated monomers in the presence of surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
  • surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
  • BE-A 630 043 discloses an aqueous dispersion containing a dispersible and an aqueous phase in which an anionic emulsifier is dissolved.
  • US-A-2 606 178 discloses a process of emulsion polymerising styrene using novel emulsifiers which are prepared by condensation of alkylene oxides with hydrocarbon acid or alcohols with subsequent sulfonation.
  • EP-A-O 755 946 discloses surfactant compounds which are based on monesters of dibasic acids with complex unsaturated groups which appear principally to be based on acrylate esters or similar materials.
  • EP-A-O 026 932 discloses an aqueous emulsion produced from the reaction product of vinyl acid monomer and another copolymerizable monomer or monomers. High solids content aqueous vinyl acetate emulsions having long term stability are provided by polymerizing vinyl acetate in the presence of this aqueous emulsion.
  • WO99 07673 A1 which was filed before this application but published afterwards, discloses anionic alkoxylate surfactants of formula R-(C(O)) m -Y-(CH(R')-CH(R')-O-) n -X where R is a di or tri unsaturated C4-22 straight or branched hydrocarbon chain, at least two double bonds of said unsaturated chain being conjugated and exhibiting oppositie geometric isomerism, m is 0 or 1, Y is O or NR, each R 1 is independently selected from hydrogen, C1-6 alkyl and phenyl, n is 1 to 50 and OX is an anionic group selected from the group consisting of acids or salts of sulphate, phosphate, sulphosuccinate, carboxymethyl, maleate, carboxyethyl, alkenylsuccinate, phthalate, sulphoethyl, 3-sulpho-2-hydroxypropyl, sulphopropyl, oxalate and
  • the present invention adopts a different approach to WO/13849 A to enabling polymerisation at desirable higher temperatures by using anionically modifying conjugated unsaturated fatty alcohol ethoxylate surfactants.
  • anionically modified surfactants can be used at temperatures significantly higher than is possible using the unsaturated fatty alcohol moderate ethoxylates of the prior art without the molecular weight penalty and other disadvantages of very high ethoxylates. They are also very efficient during particle nucleation, including at elevated temperatures e.g. 60 to 100°C, thus enabling the manufacture of product polymers with particles having a controlled smaller particle size without requiring the use of other surfactants especially at the particle nucleation stage.
  • the anionically modified surfactants are to a large extent covalently grafted into the product polymer and latices made with these polymers have improved water resistance against blushing and absorb less water than conventional products.
  • the present invention provides a method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including (i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I): R 1 -(OA) n -X (I) where
  • the method of this invention is particularly applicable to emulsion polymerisation, especially the oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of ethylenically unsaturated monomers.
  • the method is applicable to the polymerisation of systems using or including acrylic monomers and/or vinyl monomers, particularly in oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation.
  • The, desirably conjugated, double bond system is preferably not terminal in the overall hydrocarbyl group.
  • the group R 2 desirably contributes chains of at least 2 carbon atoms, more usually at least 3 and preferably at least 4 carbon atoms to the overall hydrocarbyl chain; correspondingly I is desirably at least 2 and preferably at least 3.
  • the group R 1 is the residue of an alcohol, R 1 OH, which is desirably a conjugated isomer of linoleyl alcohol.
  • the residues can be derived from the corresponding alcohol which can be made by rearrangement e.g.
  • the alcohol used in the synthesis of the surfactant or the residues can be made in situ by allowing the rearrangement to take place during surfactant synthesis e.g. under alkali catalysts during alkoxylation of linoleyl alcohol, When derived from linoleyl alcohol In this way the product will be a mixture of compounds with the two conjugated unsaturation patterns, typically containing approximately equal amounts of each compound.
  • Other doubly unsaturated residues can be made from corresponding natural source materials by similar methods.
  • alkoxylates of abietyl alcohol the alcohol derived from reduction of the carboxyl group in abletic acid; systematically named as 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10,10a-decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1-hydroxymethyl-phenanthrene).
  • the doubly unsaturated material will be available in mixture with other similar compounds having different levels of unsaturation. Mixtures of doubly unsaturated alcohol residues with singly unsaturated residues and even proportions of saturated residues can be used. Generally it is desirable that the proportion of multiple, especially double, unsaturated R 1 residues is at least 15 mole%, desirably at least 40 mole%, and preferably at least 50 mole%. Typical commercially available double unsaturated materials contain from 40 to 65 mole% commonly about 50%, double unsaturated residues. Such materials can be used satisfactorily in this invention. Materials having higher levels of double unsaturated residues may provide additional benefits but are significantly more expensive.
  • Suitable phosphorus acid groups for group X include phosphate: -O-P-(O)(OH) 2 and monoester phosphate -O-P-(O)(OR 4 )(OH), where R 4 is an ester forming group, typically a group of the formula R 1 -O-(OA) n -, where R 1 , OA, and n are as defined above for formula (I) and is usually the same as the other group R 1 -O-(OA) n - defined in formula (I).
  • the surfactant contains a high proportion, in particular at least 50%, more usually at least 60% and especially at least 65%, of the surfactant is of the formula R 1 - (OA) n -O-P-(O)(OH) 2 where R 1 , A and n are as defined in formula (I) i.e. a phosphate ester having one unsaturated alcohol residue.
  • the anionic group can be introduced into the molecule by methods generally known in the art. Usually these are by reaction of a compound R 1 -O-(OA) n -OH with suitable reactive anionic compounds.
  • suitable reactive anionic compounds for example, compounds where X is phosphate or ester phosphate can be made by reaction of a compound R 1 -O-(OA) n -OH with polyphosphoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, oxychloride or trichloride. The reaction produces a statistical mixture of mono-, di- and tri-ester products and the proportions can be controlled to increase the proportion of the desired compound by varying the proportions of the starting materials.
  • the salt forming moiety when present, can be alkali metal, particularly Li, Na or K. ammonium, including amine or hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, onium, or amine, particularly alkylamine, especially tertiary alkylamine and hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, especially tertiary alkanolamine such as triethanolamine.
  • Salts can generally be made from free acid precursors by direct reaction with an appropriate base.
  • the oxyalkylene group OA is usually a group of the formula: -(OC m H 2m )- where m is typically 2, 3 or 4, desirably 2 or 3, i.e. an oxyethylene or oxypropylene group.
  • the polyoxyalkylene chain may be wholly of oxyethylene residues or, less generally desirably, wholly of oxypropylene residues, or it may include both oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues to give a random or block copolymer chain. Generally, it is desirable that the chain is a homopolymeric polyoxyethylene chain.
  • n will generally be chosen to provide the desired properties in the intended product.
  • the polyoxyalkylene chain is a polyoxyethylene chain it will have 2 to 60, usually 5 to 30 oxyethylene residues and where it is a polyoxypropylene chain it will usually have 2 to 30 oxypropylene residues.
  • the chain is a block or random copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues the chain length chosen will typically correspond to the above ranges but numerically according to the proportion of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues in the chain.
  • oxyethylene residues will provide at least 60 mole% of the total oxyalkylene residues.
  • Oxybutylene residues can be included in the chain, but when present these will usually be present as a minor component of the chain e.g. up to about 20 mole% of the total polyoxyalkylene chain.
  • the ethylenically unsaturated monomers that can be polymerised include unsaturated carboxylic acids and their alkyl esters, amides, N-substituted amides and nitriles, aromatic vinyl compounds, diene compounds which may be included as monomers or specifically as crosslinking agents, vinylethers, vinylesters, olefines and hydrophobic allyl compounds.
  • Unsaturated carboxylic acids and their derivatives include acrylic species including alpha alkyl, especially methyl species, such as (meth)acrylic acid and (meth)acrylate esters including alkyl and hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylates, such as methyl methacrylate and vinyl (meth)acrylate; acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile; and water insoluble (meth)acrylamides such as acrylamide, N-iso propylacrylamide and N -methylol(meth)acrylamide; including cationic and quaternary species: alkanediol (meth)acrylates such as (poly)ethyleneglycol di(meth)acrylates and methoxypolyethyleneglycol (meth)acrylates, urethane acrylates and epoxy acrylates; fumaric acid, maleic acid and anhydride and itaconic acid and their esters, particularly dialkyl maleates, dialkyl fumarates, dialkyl itaconates, amides and im
  • Vinylic species include halides such as vinyl halides, especially vinyl chloride, and vinylidene halides, especially vinylidene chloride, vinyl esters such as vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher linear and branched acid esters, vinyl ethers.
  • Aromatic vinyl compounds include styrene, ⁇ -methylstyrene and p-tert -butylstyrene and vinyl pyridines.
  • Other ethylenically unsaturated monomers include olefins particulary ⁇ -olefines such as ethylene, propylene and butene and diene compounds include butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene chloroprene and divinylbenzene.
  • the polymerisation can be carried out to make homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubbers and chlorinated polymers such as polychloroprene.
  • homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-
  • the invention is particularly applicable to the manufacture of acrylic copolymers, for example those where at least 50%, more usually at least 60%, desirably at least 60% e.g. 90% or more up to 100%, by weight of the monomers are acrylic monomers.
  • the method carried out using acrylic monomers forms a specific aspect of the invention.
  • the acrylic polymers may be those based on mixed alkyl acrylates, especially where the predominant monomer is methyl methacrylate, which copolymers may include anionic units such as (meth)acrylic acid units or cationic units such as amino substituted ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as allyl amine and diallyldimethylammonium chloride.
  • the amount of surfactant used will depend on the particular monomers used and the polymerisation system used, the degree of colloidal stability needed and the desired particle size of the polymer in the product latex. However, for an otherwise conventional water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation, to give a latex having a particle size of from 80 to 500 nm the amount of surfactant used will typically be from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer (phm). More usually the amount will be from 0.5 to 2.5 phm, particularly from 1 to 2 phm.
  • the concentration of monomer is typically substantially lower than in conventional emulsion or other dispersion polymerisation systems e.g. from 3 to 10% by weight.
  • the proportion of surfactant relative to the amount of monomer is also relatively high because the microemulsion has higher interface area per unit mass of monomer corresponding to the smaller emulsion particle size.
  • Typical surfactant levels can be from 10 to 150 phm.
  • Overall the solids content of microemulsion systems are usually in the range is to 30% by weight of the total emulsion.
  • the polymerisation catalyst in the process in general may be any conventional free radical polymerisation initiator for ethylenically unsaturated systems and In particular for emulsion polymerisation systems.
  • examples include peroxidic compounds such as inorganic per-compounds e.g. potassium persulphate, and organic per-compounds e.g. tertiary butyl hydroperoxide and other free radical generators such as 2,2'-azobis iso butyronitrile.
  • the proportion of catalyst used will typically be from 0.001 to 10% by weight, end more usually from 0.01 to 7%, based on the total monomer.
  • the proportion of reducing agent is typically from 0.05 to 100 mole%, more usually 0.1 to 80%, based on the molar amount of polymerisation initiator.
  • additives in the reaction system can include chain transfer agents, such as alkyl mercaptans and similar acting compounds typically included at from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; crosslinking agents, such as divinylbenzene or ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, typically used to modify the product polymer molecular weight, at typical concentrations of from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; water soluble polymers e.g.
  • the polymerisation reaction can be carried out using generally conventional procedures typically at temperatures in the range from ambient temperature to 100°C, usually 60 to 100°C. desirably from 70 to 95°C e.g. commonly about 85°C. It is an advantage of the surfactants of the formula (I) used in this invention that they are effective at such elevated temperatures.
  • the polymerisation process of this invention can be carried out over a wide pH range for example 3 to 11, particularly 4 to 10, but more usually at moderately acid pH e.g. 3 to 6, especially 4 to 5.
  • the resultant polymer latices may be neutralised, typically to a pH of 7 to 10 using organic bases e.g. amines or alkanolamines, or inorganic bases e.g. alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates.
  • Polymerisation reactions can be carried out in a dosed kettle equipped with heating and cooling devices, agitation, thermometer, condenser and inlets for inert gas, monomers and initiator streams. All formulation ingredients can be charged to the reactor from the start in what is known in the art as a batch process. The preferred production process used when working with compounds of the present invention is a semi continuous mode. Part of the ingredients are charged to the reactor, the rest is gradually fed into the reactor in single of multiple feed streams. Monomers are fed as a neat monomer stream, or are mixed into a part of the water with a part of the surfactants and optionally other additives to form a pre-emulsion. Monomer composition can change during the feed stage to control particle morphology.
  • the latices synthesised by the method of this invention have lower levels of free surfactant species than products made using conventional surfactants that are not non-migratory. This yields end-products that can have improved resistance to water, higher colloidal stability, show better adhesion to substrates and other advantages related to reduced levels of free surfactant.
  • the product polymers obtained by the method of this invention can be used as binders or film formers in interior and exterior architectural coatings, floor coatings, paper and paperboard coatings, coatings for metal protection, waterborne adhesives, inks, binders for non-woven fabrics, concrete and cement additives.
  • Latices can be formulated as such in formulations where water is the carrier, or the polymer can be separated from the aqueous phase by flocculation, spray drying or other know techniques.
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 12-ethoxylate CS1 (400 g; MW 719.2 - calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate; 0.56 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 1 litre 4-necked round bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, nitrogen blanket adaptor, thermometer, heating mantle and a 500 ml stoppered Kontes powder addition funnel containing powdered P 2 O 5 (39.5 g; 0.28 mole).
  • the Kontes funnel included a grooved PTFE auger shaft in the outlet tube to control addition of the powder and a small bore tube and with tap to equalise pressure around the main addition tap.
  • the CS1 was heated to 75°C under stirring at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz).
  • the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 1.5 hours and then cooled to 100°C.
  • Water (21.6 g) was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature.
  • the results of NMR analysis are set out in the Table below.
  • the calculated molecular weight of the product using the mono/di-ester ratio from the NMR analysis was 1065.
  • the phosphoric acid ester was neutralised using ammonia (25%; ca 13% by weight based on the product) and the mixture further diluted with demineralised water to give a 10% by weight active surfactant solution with a pH of 6.8, after equilibrating overnight.
  • This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S1.
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate CS1 (143.8 g; MW 719.2; 0.2 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a flask set up as described above for making the mono-phosphate.
  • the alcohol was dewatered under vacuum (7 mm Hg: ca 130 Pa) for 1 hour under stirring (400 rpm; ca 6.7 Hz), the vacuum was released and the mixture cooled to 70°C.
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 20-ethoxylate (341 g; 0.326 mole - based on a MW of 1049 calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 500 ml round bottom flask equipped with a pressure equalised dropping funnel, agitator, nitrogen blanket adaptor (0.2 ml nitrogen per minute through the flask during the reaction), thermometer, thermostatically controlled heating mantle and a horizontal condenser to a receiver.
  • the ethoxylate was heated to 80°C to melt it and then polyphosphoric acid (technical grade - 84.53 % P 2 O 5 .
  • Batch polymersations were carried out at low solids (10%) to simulate the conditions during the seed stage of a semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation to provide an evaluation of surfactant efficiency during particle nucleation.
  • Batch recipe Material (parts by wt) Monomers: (%by wt) 100 8A 48.8 MMA 49.9 MAA 1.3 Potassium Peroxidisulphate 0.3 Sodium bicarbonate 0.1 Water 15 S1 variable* Water to 1000 * the differing concentrations of S1 were expressed as phm (parts per 100 parts monomer)
  • the Z-average particle size of the polymer particles was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer 4 (photon correlation spectroscopy) with the detector at 90°.
  • Z-averaga article size Run No S1 amount size (phm) (nm) 1.1 0.5 86.4 12 0.9 76.8 1.3 1.6 61.2 1.4 2 61.2
  • BA/MMA/MAA 48.8/49.9/1.3 by wt latices at 45% solids were made by semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation. Two were made using surfactant S (Runs 1 and 2) and one, for comparison, using surfactant CS1 (Run 3).
  • the surfactant concentration in the starting emulsion was chosen to give a desired number of particles in the initial polymerisation stage (when using surfactant S1) so as to yield a final latex particle size of 150 nm.
  • the level was calculated from the amount of surfactant used and final particle size distribution in Example 1.
  • the total surfactant concentration was varied from 1.05 to 1.81 phm.
  • the reactor was a jacketed 2 litre 4 necked round bottom glass flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermometer, condenser and supplementary inlets for nitrogen and feed streams.
  • Example 1 The batch poly described in Example 1 was re-run using various amount of surfactant S4 instead of the surfactant S1 used in Example 1.
  • the Z-average particle size (in nm) of the latices was measured and the results are set out in the table below: amount of surfactant (phm) 0.5 0.9 1.6 2 5 10 neutralised S4 86.4 76.8 61,2 61.2 non-neutralised S4 73.9 65.1 47.7
  • Example 2 Four co-polymer acrylic latices were made by the general semi-continuous method described In Example 2 using anionic surfactant S4.
  • the target latex polymer particle size was 150 nm, the latex polymer solid yield 450 g, the target number of polymer particles 2.3.10 17 , and the monomers used were butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid at base ratios of BA/MMA/MAA of 48.8/49.9/1.3.
  • the overall percentage of MAA was reduced to 0.5%, with the amounts of BA and MMA adjusted to compensate keeping the ratio of BA to MMA constant.
  • the proportions used are included In Table 1, Latex Particle Size.
  • Example 4 Runs similar to Example 4 were carried out using anionic surfactant S4 at 0.33 phm in the starting emulsion (1) and S5 (Example 5) and S6 (Example 6) In the main monomer feed (3).
  • the proportions used are Included In Table 1. Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given In Table 3.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymerisation Methods In General (AREA)
  • Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
  • Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Adhesives Or Adhesive Processes (AREA)

Description

  • This invention relates to the free radical initiated addition polymerisation of unsaturated monomers in the presence of surfactants including anionic non-migratory surfactants, in particular emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants and specifically to the manufacture of acrylic polymers by oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods using such surfactants.
  • PCT published Application No WO 91 13849 A describes fatty alcohol ethoxylates of certain unsaturated alcohols and their use as surfactants in oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation methods. The unsaturated alcohols described are conjugated doubly unsaturated fatty alcohols derived from linoleyl alcohol. Conjugated double bonds are said to aid incorporation of the surfactant in the polymer making the surfactant non-migratory. Whilst these compounds can be effective, their use is limited because they are not effective surfactants at the temperatures usually used in emulsion polymerisations. In the polymerisation Example of WO 91/13849 A a "conjugated linoleyl" 10-ethoxylate is used in an emulsion polymerisation run at 30°C, whereas commercial thermally initiated emulsion polymerisations are typically run at from 50 to 100°C, usually 60 to 90°C. The use of lower temperatures results in significantly lower polymerisation rates thus drastically reducing the productivity of the reaction. Operation at higher temperatures might be possible by using much higher levels of ethoxylation, but this reduces the weight efficiency of the surfactants and may have deleterious effects on the polymerisation or on the polymer emulsions in use. These surfactants are also relatively inefficient during the particle nucleation stage of polymerisation.
  • BE-A 630 043 discloses an aqueous dispersion containing a dispersible and an aqueous phase in which an anionic emulsifier is dissolved.
  • US-A-2 606 178 discloses a process of emulsion polymerising styrene using novel emulsifiers which are prepared by condensation of alkylene oxides with hydrocarbon acid or alcohols with subsequent sulfonation.
  • EP-A-O 755 946 discloses surfactant compounds which are based on monesters of dibasic acids with complex unsaturated groups which appear principally to be based on acrylate esters or similar materials.
  • EP-A-O 026 932 discloses an aqueous emulsion produced from the reaction product of vinyl acid monomer and another copolymerizable monomer or monomers. High solids content aqueous vinyl acetate emulsions having long term stability are provided by polymerizing vinyl acetate in the presence of this aqueous emulsion.
  • WO99 07673 A1 , which was filed before this application but published afterwards, discloses anionic alkoxylate surfactants of formula R-(C(O))m-Y-(CH(R')-CH(R')-O-)n-X where R is a di or tri unsaturated C4-22 straight or branched hydrocarbon chain, at least two double bonds of said unsaturated chain being conjugated and exhibiting oppositie geometric isomerism, m is 0 or 1, Y is O or NR, each R1 is independently selected from hydrogen, C1-6 alkyl and phenyl, n is 1 to 50 and OX is an anionic group selected from the group consisting of acids or salts of sulphate, phosphate, sulphosuccinate, carboxymethyl, maleate, carboxyethyl, alkenylsuccinate, phthalate, sulphoethyl, 3-sulpho-2-hydroxypropyl, sulphopropyl, oxalate and citrate. It discloses use of these surfactants as stabilisers in the preparation of aqueous dispersions of polymeric particles.
  • The present invention adopts a different approach to WO/13849 A to enabling polymerisation at desirable higher temperatures by using anionically modifying conjugated unsaturated fatty alcohol ethoxylate surfactants. Such anionically modified surfactants can be used at temperatures significantly higher than is possible using the unsaturated fatty alcohol moderate ethoxylates of the prior art without the molecular weight penalty and other disadvantages of very high ethoxylates. They are also very efficient during particle nucleation, including at elevated temperatures e.g. 60 to 100°C, thus enabling the manufacture of product polymers with particles having a controlled smaller particle size without requiring the use of other surfactants especially at the particle nucleation stage. We believe that the anionically modified surfactants are to a large extent covalently grafted into the product polymer and latices made with these polymers have improved water resistance against blushing and absorb less water than conventional products.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including (i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I):

            R1-(OA)n-X     (I)

    where
  • R1
    is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bonds;
    OA
    is an oxyalkylene group:
    n
    is from 2 to 60; and
    X
    is a phosphorus acid group or a salt thereof; and (ii) a nonionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor of the surfactant of formula (I).
  • The method of this invention is particularly applicable to emulsion polymerisation, especially the oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation of ethylenically unsaturated monomers. In particular, the method is applicable to the polymerisation of systems using or including acrylic monomers and/or vinyl monomers, particularly in oil-in-water emulsion polymerisation. These form particular aspects of the invention.
  • The group R1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bonds. In particular it is a C18 or C20 unsaturated hydrocarbyl group such as an unsaturated alkyl group. Desirably, at least two of the double bonds are conjugated, and in particular the group R1 includes two double bonds and these double bonds are conjugated. Particularly desirable groups R1 are of the formula:

            R2-(-CH=CH-CH=CH-)-R3-     (II)

    where
  • R2
    is a C1 to C8 alkyl group, particularly a group CH3-(CH2)l where l is from 0 to 7; and
    R3
    is a C4 to C12 alkylene group particularly a group (CH2)m where m is from 4 to 12.
  • In this case the compound of the formula (I) is of the formula (Ia):

            R2-(-CH=CH-CH=CH-)-R3-(OA)n-X     (Ia)

    where R2, R3, OA, n and X are as defined above.
  • The, desirably conjugated, double bond system is preferably not terminal in the overall hydrocarbyl group. In particular, referring to the formula (II), the group R2 desirably contributes chains of at least 2 carbon atoms, more usually at least 3 and preferably at least 4 carbon atoms to the overall hydrocarbyl chain; correspondingly I is desirably at least 2 and preferably at least 3. We have obtained good results when the group R1 is the residue of an alcohol, R1OH, which is desirably a conjugated isomer of linoleyl alcohol. These residues are residues of the formula (II) in which R2 is n-pentyl or n-hexyl (I = 4 or 5) and R3 is correspondingly n-nonyl or n-octyl (m = 9 or 8), derived from whichever of the two double bonds in linoleyl alcohol:
    CH3(CH2)4.CH=CH.CH2.CH=CH.(CH2)7CH2OH moves to form a conjugated system. The residues can be derived from the corresponding alcohol which can be made by rearrangement e.g. under strong base catalysis, and the alcohol used in the synthesis of the surfactant or the residues can be made in situ by allowing the rearrangement to take place during surfactant synthesis e.g. under alkali catalysts during alkoxylation of linoleyl alcohol, When derived from linoleyl alcohol In this way the product will be a mixture of compounds with the two conjugated unsaturation patterns, typically containing approximately equal amounts of each compound. Other doubly unsaturated residues can be made from corresponding natural source materials by similar methods. Other potential double unsaturated derivatives include alkoxylates of abietyl alcohol (the alcohol derived from reduction of the carboxyl group in abletic acid; systematically named as 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,10,10a-decahydro-1,4a-dimethyl-7-(1-methylethyl)-1-hydroxymethyl-phenanthrene).
  • Typically, when alcohols derived from natural sources are used, the doubly unsaturated material will be available in mixture with other similar compounds having different levels of unsaturation. Mixtures of doubly unsaturated alcohol residues with singly unsaturated residues and even proportions of saturated residues can be used. Generally It is desirable that the proportion of multiple, especially double, unsaturated R1 residues is at least 15 mole%, desirably at least 40 mole%, and preferably at least 50 mole%. Typical commercially available double unsaturated materials contain from 40 to 65 mole% commonly about 50%, double unsaturated residues. Such materials can be used satisfactorily in this invention. Materials having higher levels of double unsaturated residues may provide additional benefits but are significantly more expensive.
  • Suitable phosphorus acid groups for group X include phosphate: -O-P-(O)(OH)2 and monoester phosphate -O-P-(O)(OR4)(OH), where R4 is an ester forming group, typically a group of the formula R1-O-(OA)n-, where R1, OA, and n are as defined above for formula (I) and is usually the same as the other group R1-O-(OA)n- defined in formula (I).
  • When the anionic functionality is provided by a phosphorus acid group, it is generally desirable that the surfactant contains a high proportion, in particular at least 50%, more usually at least 60% and especially at least 65%, of the surfactant is of the formula R1 - (OA)n -O-P-(O)(OH)2 where R1, A and n are as defined in formula (I) i.e. a phosphate ester having one unsaturated alcohol residue.
  • The anionic group can be introduced into the molecule by methods generally known in the art. Mostly these are by reaction of a compound R1-O-(OA)n-OH with suitable reactive anionic compounds. For example, compounds where X is phosphate or ester phosphate can be made by reaction of a compound R1-O-(OA)n-OH with polyphosphoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, oxychloride or trichloride. The reaction produces a statistical mixture of mono-, di- and tri-ester products and the proportions can be controlled to increase the proportion of the desired compound by varying the proportions of the starting materials.
  • The salt forming moiety, when present, can be alkali metal, particularly Li, Na or K. ammonium, including amine or hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, onium, or amine, particularly alkylamine, especially tertiary alkylamine and hydroxy-substituted amine e.g. alkanolamine, especially tertiary alkanolamine such as triethanolamine. Salts can generally be made from free acid precursors by direct reaction with an appropriate base.
  • The oxyalkylene group OA is usually a group of the formula: -(OCmH2m)- where m is typically 2, 3 or 4, desirably 2 or 3, i.e. an oxyethylene or oxypropylene group. The polyoxyalkylene chain may be wholly of oxyethylene residues or, less generally desirably, wholly of oxypropylene residues, or it may include both oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues to give a random or block copolymer chain. Generally, it is desirable that the chain is a homopolymeric polyoxyethylene chain.
  • The value of n will generally be chosen to provide the desired properties in the intended product. Where the polyoxyalkylene chain is a polyoxyethylene chain it will have 2 to 60, usually 5 to 30 oxyethylene residues and where it is a polyoxypropylene chain it will usually have 2 to 30 oxypropylene residues. Where the chain is a block or random copolymer of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues the chain length chosen will typically correspond to the above ranges but numerically according to the proportion of oxyethylene and oxypropylene residues in the chain. In copolymer chains usually oxyethylene residues will provide at least 60 mole% of the total oxyalkylene residues. Oxybutylene residues can be included in the chain, but when present these will usually be present as a minor component of the chain e.g. up to about 20 mole% of the total polyoxyalkylene chain.
  • Of course, numerical values of numbers of repeat units in the polyoxyalkylene chain are average values. As is common to surfactants containing a polyoxyalkylene chain, the higher the proportion of oxyethylene residues, and the longer the polyoxyethylene chain, and the more hydrophilic the product.
  • The ethylenically unsaturated monomers that can be polymerised include unsaturated carboxylic acids and their alkyl esters, amides, N-substituted amides and nitriles, aromatic vinyl compounds, diene compounds which may be included as monomers or specifically as crosslinking agents, vinylethers, vinylesters, olefines and hydrophobic allyl compounds.
  • Unsaturated carboxylic acids and their derivatives include acrylic species including alpha alkyl, especially methyl species, such as (meth)acrylic acid and (meth)acrylate esters including alkyl and hydroxyalkyl (meth)acrylates, such as methyl methacrylate and vinyl (meth)acrylate; acrylonitrile and methacrylonitrile; and water insoluble (meth)acrylamides such as acrylamide, N-isopropylacrylamide and N-methylol(meth)acrylamide; including cationic and quaternary species: alkanediol (meth)acrylates such as (poly)ethyleneglycol di(meth)acrylates and methoxypolyethyleneglycol (meth)acrylates, urethane acrylates and epoxy acrylates; fumaric acid, maleic acid and anhydride and itaconic acid and their esters, particularly dialkyl maleates, dialkyl fumarates, dialkyl itaconates, amides and imides.
  • Vinylic species include halides such as vinyl halides, especially vinyl chloride, and vinylidene halides, especially vinylidene chloride, vinyl esters such as vinyl acetate, vinyl propionate and higher linear and branched acid esters, vinyl ethers. Aromatic vinyl compounds include styrene, α-methylstyrene and p-tert-butylstyrene and vinyl pyridines. Other ethylenically unsaturated monomers include olefins particulary α-olefines such as ethylene, propylene and butene and diene compounds include butadiene, isoprene, isobutadiene chloroprene and divinylbenzene.
  • The polymerisation can be carried out to make homopolymers such as poly(vlnyl acetate), polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) or copolymers such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, acrylic copolymers and styrene/acrylic copolymers, styrene-butadlene rubbers and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubbers, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubbers and chlorinated polymers such as polychloroprene.
  • The invention is particularly applicable to the manufacture of acrylic copolymers, for example those where at least 50%, more usually at least 60%, desirably at least 60% e.g. 90% or more up to 100%, by weight of the monomers are acrylic monomers. The method carried out using acrylic monomers forms a specific aspect of the invention. The acrylic polymers may be those based on mixed alkyl acrylates, especially where the predominant monomer is methyl methacrylate, which copolymers may include anionic units such as (meth)acrylic acid units or cationic units such as amino substituted ethylenically unsaturated monomers such as allyl amine and diallyldimethylammonium chloride.
  • The amount of surfactant used will depend on the particular monomers used and the polymerisation system used, the degree of colloidal stability needed and the desired particle size of the polymer in the product latex. However, for an otherwise conventional water-in-oil emulsion polymerisation, to give a latex having a particle size of from 80 to 500 nm the amount of surfactant used will typically be from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer (phm). More usually the amount will be from 0.5 to 2.5 phm, particularly from 1 to 2 phm.
  • In microemulsion polymerisation systems, the concentration of monomer is typically substantially lower than in conventional emulsion or other dispersion polymerisation systems e.g. from 3 to 10% by weight. The proportion of surfactant relative to the amount of monomer is also relatively high because the microemulsion has higher interface area per unit mass of monomer corresponding to the smaller emulsion particle size. Typical surfactant levels can be from 10 to 150 phm. Overall the solids content of microemulsion systems are usually in the range is to 30% by weight of the total emulsion.
  • Mixtures of the compounds of the formula (I) with the non-ionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor are used as the surfactant emulsifiers in the polymerisation process of this invention, particularly to tallor the properties of the end product polymer. If desired minor amounts of conventional anionic, cationic or non-ionic surfactants may be used. In this context, the presence of 'conventional' materials derived from components of R1 [in formula (I)] in the synthetic raw materials which do not have multiple unsaturation is not considered as adding conventional surfactants.
  • The polymerisation catalyst in the process in general may be any conventional free radical polymerisation initiator for ethylenically unsaturated systems and In particular for emulsion polymerisation systems. Examples include peroxidic compounds such as inorganic per-compounds e.g. potassium persulphate, and organic per-compounds e.g. tertiary butyl hydroperoxide and other free radical generators such as 2,2'-azobisisobutyronitrile. The proportion of catalyst used will typically be from 0.001 to 10% by weight, end more usually from 0.01 to 7%, based on the total monomer. When a redox couple is used as the initiator, the proportion of reducing agent is typically from 0.05 to 100 mole%, more usually 0.1 to 80%, based on the molar amount of polymerisation initiator.
  • Other additives in the reaction system can include chain transfer agents, such as alkyl mercaptans and similar acting compounds typically included at from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; crosslinking agents, such as divinylbenzene or ethylene glycol dimethacrylate, typically used to modify the product polymer molecular weight, at typical concentrations of from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 1 phm; water soluble polymers e.g. hydroxyethylcellulose, carboxymethylcellulose, polyethyleneglycol and partially hydrolysed polyvinylacetate, typically used to modify the viscosity of the system, included at concentrations from 0 to 10 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 2 phm; buffers for pH control, sequestering agents, electrolytes and organic solvents in minor amounts totalling typically from 0 to 5 phm, more usually from 0.1 to 3 phm.
  • The polymerisation reaction can be carried out using generally conventional procedures typically at temperatures in the range from ambient temperature to 100°C, usually 60 to 100°C. desirably from 70 to 95°C e.g. commonly about 85°C. It is an advantage of the surfactants of the formula (I) used in this invention that they are effective at such elevated temperatures.
  • The polymerisation process of this invention, particularly as an emulsion, especially an oil-in-water emulsion, polymerisation, can be carried out over a wide pH range for example 3 to 11, particularly 4 to 10, but more usually at moderately acid pH e.g. 3 to 6, especially 4 to 5. After completion of polymerisation, the resultant polymer latices may be neutralised, typically to a pH of 7 to 10 using organic bases e.g. amines or alkanolamines, or inorganic bases e.g. alkali metal hydroxides or carbonates.
  • Polymerisation reactions can be carried out in a dosed kettle equipped with heating and cooling devices, agitation, thermometer, condenser and inlets for inert gas, monomers and initiator streams. All formulation ingredients can be charged to the reactor from the start in what is known in the art as a batch process. The preferred production process used when working with compounds of the present invention is a semi continuous mode. Part of the ingredients are charged to the reactor, the rest is gradually fed into the reactor in single of multiple feed streams. Monomers are fed as a neat monomer stream, or are mixed into a part of the water with a part of the surfactants and optionally other additives to form a pre-emulsion. Monomer composition can change during the feed stage to control particle morphology.
  • The latices synthesised by the method of this invention have lower levels of free surfactant species than products made using conventional surfactants that are not non-migratory. This yields end-products that can have improved resistance to water, higher colloidal stability, show better adhesion to substrates and other advantages related to reduced levels of free surfactant.
  • The product polymers obtained by the method of this invention can be used as binders or film formers in interior and exterior architectural coatings, floor coatings, paper and paperboard coatings, coatings for metal protection, waterborne adhesives, inks, binders for non-woven fabrics, concrete and cement additives. Latices can be formulated as such in formulations where water is the carrier, or the polymer can be separated from the aqueous phase by flocculation, spray drying or other know techniques.
  • The following Examples illustrate the invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise stated.
  • Materials
  • CS1
    'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate made as described in WO91/13849 A (based on Ocenol 110/130 linoleyl alcohol with an iodine value from 110 to 130) The following products were made from CS1 as described below:
    S1
    neutralised mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 10-ethoxylate.
    S2
    neutralised di-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 10-ethoxylate.
    S3
    mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 6-ethoxylete.
    S4
    mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate.
    S5
    mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 20-ethoxylate.
    S6
    mono-phosphated 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 30-ethoxylate.
    Water - Demineralised water purged with nitrogen for 15 minutes before use
    KPS
    potassium persulphate free radical polymerisation initiator
    Test Methods
    • Viscosity - was measured with a Brookfield RV viscometer using spindle 4 at a speed of 100 rpm (ca 1.7 Hz). Results are given as "Visc" in mPa.s
    • Surface Tension - was measured by the Wilhelmy Plate method with results as "ST" in mN/m.
    • Particle size - was measured with a Malvern Zetasizer. The Z-average particle size is given as "Z-Ave" in nm and volume average particle size as V-ave in nm.
    • wet grit - was measured by filtration of latex through a sieve with the result given as the weight % of wet grit based on total latex solids - sieves of 240µm and 80µm were used.
    • Foaming - was measured using the Ross Miles foam test on 0.5% by weight aqueous surfactant solutions or on the latex diluted to 5% solids end results are given as RM Foam Height after 0, 5 and 10 minutes.
    • Shear Stability - was assessed by subjecting the latex to high shear stirring using a slotted circular paddle stirrer with vertical peripheral extensions at ca 3000 rpm (50 Hz).
    • Freeze Thaw Stability (FT Stab) - was assessed as the number of 24 hour cycles between -20°C and 23°C (12 hours at each temperature that the neutralised test latex withstands without breaking.
    • Water Spotting (Spot) - was assessed by placing a spat of water on a film made using the latex and ranking the extent to which the film is whitened; 0 = template film whitening and 10 = film unaffected. For comparison a film made from a latex polymerised using (saturated) stearyl alcohol 10-ethoxylate mono-phosphate as the surfactant scores 1 on this test.
    • Contact angle (degrees) - was measured at 1, 5 and 11 minutes after placing a drop of water on a latex film of 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40" for 7 days.
    • Bloom - was measured by immersing a latex film, 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40°, in water and measuring the % haze initially (OH), after 2 hours (2H), 1 day (1D) and 1 week (1W) immersion.
    • Water uptake (%) was measured by immersing a latex film, 150 nm wet thickness dried at 40°, in water and measuring the % water uptake after 1 day (1D). 5 days (5D) and 2 weeks (2W) immersion.
    Synthesis of phosphated surfactants S1 - 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate mono-phosphate
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 12-ethoxylate CS1 (400 g; MW 719.2 - calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate; 0.56 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 1 litre 4-necked round bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, nitrogen blanket adaptor, thermometer, heating mantle and a 500 ml stoppered Kontes powder addition funnel containing powdered P2O5 (39.5 g; 0.28 mole). The Kontes funnel included a grooved PTFE auger shaft in the outlet tube to control addition of the powder and a small bore tube and with tap to equalise pressure around the main addition tap. The funnel outlet led towards the flask centre to minimise accumulation on the flask walls. The CS1 was heated to 75°C under stirring at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz). Water (3.6 g) was added to increase the total amount of water in the reaction medium to 1 mole and P2O5 was added stepwise through the Kontes funnel so that the reaction exotherm raised the temperature to a maximum of 100°C. After completion of the P2O5 addition, the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 1.5 hours and then cooled to 100°C. Water (21.6 g) was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature. The results of NMR analysis are set out in the Table below. The calculated molecular weight of the product using the mono/di-ester ratio from the NMR analysis was 1065. The phosphoric acid ester was neutralised using ammonia (25%; ca 13% by weight based on the product) and the mixture further diluted with demineralised water to give a 10% by weight active surfactant solution with a pH of 6.8, after equilibrating overnight. This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S1.
  • S2 - conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate di-phosphate
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 12-ethoxylate CS1 (143.8 g; MW 719.2; 0.2 mole) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a flask set up as described above for making the mono-phosphate. The alcohol was dewatered under vacuum (7 mm Hg: ca 130 Pa) for 1 hour under stirring (400 rpm; ca 6.7 Hz), the vacuum was released and the mixture cooled to 70°C.
  • P2O5 (8.5 g; 0.06 mole) was added stepwise through the Kontes funnel over a period of 25 minutes. The reaction mixture was then heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 3 hours and then cooled to 100°C. Water (9.0 g) was then to bring the total water content to 5% by weight the temperature held at 100°C for 0.5 hours and the mixture was then cooled to ambient temperature. The product was neutralised with ammonia (ca 7% by weight) and diluted generally as described for S1 and the resulting solution designated S2.
  • The method described for making S1 was also used to make S3 and S4 containing 6 and 12 EO residues respectively but S5 and S6 containing 20 and 30 EO residues respectively the following method using polyphosphoric acid rather than phosphorus pentoxide was used:
  • S6 - 'conjugated linoleyl alcohol' 20-ethoxylate mono-phosphate
  • Conjugated linoleyl alcohol 20-ethoxylate (341 g; 0.326 mole - based on a MW of 1049 calculated from the hydroxyl value of the ethoxylate) was charged under a nitrogen blanket at ambient temperature to a 500 ml round bottom flask equipped with a pressure equalised dropping funnel, agitator, nitrogen blanket adaptor (0.2 ml nitrogen per minute through the flask during the reaction), thermometer, thermostatically controlled heating mantle and a horizontal condenser to a receiver. The ethoxylate was heated to 80°C to melt it and then polyphosphoric acid (technical grade - 84.53 % P2O5. 42.0 g; equivalent to 0.25 mole P2O5) was gradually added keeping the temperature in the range 80 to 100°C. After completion of the polyphosphoric acid addition, the reaction mixture was heated to 140°C, held at this temperature for 3 hours and then cooled to 90 to 100°C. Water was added to bring the total water content to 5% by weight, the mixture hold at 100°C for 0.5 hours and then cooled to ambient temperature. This surfactant solution was used in the Examples as the source of surfactant S6. Surfactant S7 was made by a similar process but substituting conjugated linoleyl alcohol 30-ethoxylate for the 20-ethoxylate material.
  • Analysis data on anionic surfactants made by the methods described above and their properties are summarised in the table below:
    Analysis (% by wt)
    Code EO No H3PO4 Mono Di Tri Poly Pyro Free Alcohol
    S1 10 2.2 62 32 1.6 0.1 2.5
    S2 10 0.4 36 60 ND 0.2 4.3
    S3 6 3 67 27 ND <0.1 3
    S4 12 2.7 69 24 ND 0.1 4.2
    S5 20 5.6 75 14 ND 0.1 5.5
    S6 30 4.6 79 15 ND 0.4 1.9
  • Surface Tension (given against Log[surfactant concentration in wt%]) and RM Foam Height at 0.5% surfactant in water for anionic surfactant S4:
    Surface Tension RM Foam Height
    Surfactant 0 -1 -2 -3.3 0 5 10
    S3 3 2.5 2
    S4 34.3 36.5 38.2 49.2 12 11.8 10.3
    S5 40.0 40.8 44.0 47.0 10.8 7 6
  • Example 1 (Reference) Batch emulsion polymerisation
  • Batch polymersations were carried out at low solids (10%) to simulate the conditions during the seed stage of a semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation to provide an evaluation of surfactant efficiency during particle nucleation. Batch recipe
    Material (parts by wt)
    Monomers: (%by wt) 100
    8A 48.8
    MMA 49.9
    MAA 1.3
    Potassium Peroxidisulphate 0.3
    Sodium bicarbonate 0.1
    Water 15
    S1 variable*
    Water to 1000
    * the differing concentrations of S1 were expressed as phm (parts per 100 parts monomer)
  • The Z-average particle size of the polymer particles was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer 4 (photon correlation spectroscopy) with the detector at 90°. Z-averaga article size
    Run No S1 amount size
    (phm) (nm)
    1.1 0.5 86.4
    12 0.9 76.8
    1.3 1.6 61.2
    1.4 2 61.2
  • Example 2 (Reference)
  • Three BA/MMA/MAA (48.8/49.9/1.3 by wt) latices at 45% solids were made by semi-continuous emulsion polymerisation. Two were made using surfactant S (Runs 1 and 2) and one, for comparison, using surfactant CS1 (Run 3). The surfactant concentration in the starting emulsion was chosen to give a desired number of particles in the initial polymerisation stage (when using surfactant S1) so as to yield a final latex particle size of 150 nm. The level was calculated from the amount of surfactant used and final particle size distribution in Example 1. The total surfactant concentration was varied from 1.05 to 1.81 phm.
  • Materials
  • For each run four feed mixtures were made up: Run 1 Run 2 Run 3
    1 Starting emulsion
    Water 510.9 510.8 510.9
    Monomers 61.1 81.1 61.1
    Surfactant solution (10%) 9.8 9.8 9.8
    2 Start initiator
    KPS 0.2 0.2 0.2
    Na bicarbonate 0.06 0.06 0.06
    Water 20 20 20
    3 Main monomer feed
    Monomers 838.9 838.9 838.9
    Surfactant solution (10%) 153.1 85 153.1
    Water 343.7 411.8 343.7
    4 Feed initiator
    KPS 1.7 1.7 1.7
    Na bicarbonate 0.6 0.6 0.6
    Water 60 60 60
    Total 2000 2000 2000
  • Production method
  • The reactor was a jacketed 2 litre 4 necked round bottom glass flask equipped with an overhead stirrer, thermometer, condenser and supplementary inlets for nitrogen and feed streams.
    • 1 the monomer pre-emulsion was made up by emulsifying the monomer phase in a mixture of the surfactant solution and Water under stirring with a paddle stirrer at 400 rpm (ca 6.7 Hz)
    • 2 the starting emulsion was made in the reactor by charging the water, surfactant and part of the monomer, at a surfactant level to give about 2.3 x 1017 polymer particles.
    • 3 the reactor was heated to 85°C under stirring and the first part of the initiator was added and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 minutes under a nitrogen blanket
    • 4 the remainder of the monomer emulsion and initiator feed were fed to the reactor simultaneously in two separate streams over a period of three hours
    • 5 the reactor was kept at polymerisation temperature for a further 90 minutes, then cooled to 30°C
    • 6 the product emulsion was filtered sequentially through filters with pore sizes of 240µm and 80µm and then stored in a bottle.
    Example 2 Semi-continuous polymerisation Results
    Run1 Run2 Run3
    Grit >240µm (g; wet weighed) 0 0.13 18.5
    Grit 80 - 240µm (g; wet weighed) 1.7 1.6 n.d.
    Coagulum (g; wet weighed) 0 0 4
    Volume average particle size (µm) 146.6 144.6 421.9/706.6*
    * multimodal distribution
  • These data show that the non-lonic ethoxylated 'conjugated Ilnoleyl alcohol' surfactant CS1 was not efficient during the particle nucleation stage of polymerisation using normal amounts of surfactant. The product latices made using the phosphate ester surfactant S1, as well as providing efficient action during particle nucleation, showed better stability during polymerisation resulting in lower levels of macrogrit and coagulum. The latex stabilised with CS1 sedimented after storage over a week end, probably because of its large particle size. No attempt was made to redisperse the sedimented layer prior to sampling for particle size analysis and for this reason, the microgrit level was not determined.
  • Example 3 (Reference)
  • The batch poly described in Example 1 was re-run using various amount of surfactant S4 instead of the surfactant S1 used in Example 1. The Z-average particle size (in nm) of the latices was measured and the results are set out in the table below:
    amount of surfactant (phm)
    0.5 0.9 1.6 2 5 10
    neutralised S4 86.4 76.8 61,2 61.2
    non-neutralised S4 73.9 65.1 47.7
    NPE6* 101.1
    * NPE6 is a conventional nonylphenol 6-ethoxylate phosphate surfactant.
  • These data indicate that even when not neutralised, surfactant S4 is more efficient than the conventional anionic surfactant in emulsifiying the monomer. Further data are given in Tables 1, 2 and 3 below.
  • Example 4 (Reference)
  • Four co-polymer acrylic latices were made by the general semi-continuous method described In Example 2 using anionic surfactant S4. The target latex polymer particle size was 150 nm, the latex polymer solid yield 450 g, the target number of polymer particles 2.3.1017, and the monomers used were butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid at base ratios of BA/MMA/MAA of 48.8/49.9/1.3. For some runs, the overall percentage of MAA was reduced to 0.5%, with the amounts of BA and MMA adjusted to compensate keeping the ratio of BA to MMA constant. The proportions used are included In Table 1, Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given in Table 3. For each run four feed mixtures were made up:
    4a 4b 4c 4d
    1 Starting emulsion
    Water 236.3 236.3 236.3 236.3
    Monomers 29.8 29.8 29.8 29.8
    Surfactant solution (20%) 7.45 7.45 7.45 7.45
    2 Start initiator
    KPS 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
    Na bicarbonate 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
    Water 10 10 10 10
    3 Main monomer feed
    Monomers 420.2 420.2 420.2 420.2
    Surfactant solution (10%) 28.4 49.4 71.5 49.4
    Water 225.6 201.7 180.45 202.5
    4 Feed initiator
    KPS 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84
    Na bicarbonate 1.25 1.25 1.25 0.4
    Water 30 30 30 30
    t-butyl hydroperoxide (70%) in 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
    water 5 5 5 5
    Na formaldehyde sulfoxylate in 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18
    Water 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
    Total 1000 1000 1000 1000
  • Examples 5 and 6 (Reference)
  • Runs similar to Example 4 were carried out using anionic surfactant S4 at 0.33 phm in the starting emulsion (1) and S5 (Example 5) and S6 (Example 6) In the main monomer feed (3). The proportions used are Included In Table 1. Latex Particle Size. Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability data are included in Table 2 and water uptake testing data is given In Table 3. Table 1 - Process Variables and Latex Properties
    Ex No MAA Surf. Z-ave pH S T wet grit Vise RM Foam Height
    (%) (phm) (nm) (mN/m) (%) (mPa.s) 0 5 10
    3a 1.3 1.5 141.3 110 4.5 2 0.5
    3b 1.3 2.5 143.7 2.8 130 7.5 8.5 6
    3c 0.5 2.5 144.2 2.8 110 9 9 5
    4a 1.3 1.5 142.4 6.02 0.01 60 3 0.5
    4b 1.3 2.5 143.1 3.15 46.8 0.02 90 9.9 9.5 9
    4c 1.3 3.5 145.8 2.75 48.2 0.02 130 10.8 9 5.5
    4d 0.5 2.5 145.3 3.66 44.4 0.04 90 10 5.6 4
    5a 1.3 1.5 140.1 2.8 0.04 6 2 1.5
    5b 1.3 2.5 142.5 2.7 0.01 80 7.5 5 3.5
    5c 0.5 2.5 143.2 2.9 0.4 100
    6a 1.3 1.5 142.9 3.6 0.23 65 3.5 0.5 0.5
    6b 1.3 2.5 143.7 3.4 130 4 3.5 3.5
    6c 0.5 2.5 141 3.7 0.02 120 5.5 3.5 1.5
    Table 2 - Latex Testing
    Particle Size, Shear Stability and Freeze Thaw Stability (FT Stab)
    Ex No non-neutr latex Shear Stab FT Stab neutr
    Z-ave Vol-ave Z-ave Vol-ave
    (nm) (nm) (nm) (nm)
    3a 141.3 137.6 146.7 139.5
    3b 143.7 138.4 143.4 132 5
    3c 144.2 133.3 144.5 132.3 -
    4a 142.4 127.1 - - 5
    4b 143.1 135.2 142.7 135.9 5
    4c 145.8 141.1 144.4 136.4 5
    4d 145.3 136.5 - - -
    5a 140.1 131.2 - - 5
    5b 142.5 130.5 170 155 5
    5c 143.2 136.6 - - -
    6a 142.9 135.6 - - 1
    6b 143.7 139.2 145.5 129 5
    6c 141 131.5 - - -
    Table 3
    Latex film water resistance Testing
    Ex spot No Contact angle Bloom (% Haze) Water Uptake (wt%)
    1 min 5 min 11 min 0H 2H 1D 1W 1D 5D 2W
    3a 0.9 2.6 13.3 17 8 13 18
    3b 66 63 55 1.9 2.8 6.8 15.5 8 24 25
    3c 66 63 55 0.7 2.3 12 20.7 15 20 33
    4a 6 63 62 0.5 2.1 9.2 24.9 10 15 15
    4b 6 62 62 0.6 1.8 6.8 20.4 10 17 22
    4c 65 58 0.6 3.1 18 66.5 10 70
    4d 6 65 59 1.3 3.2 8 22.7 11 13 19
    5a 71 65 58 0.3 2.6 13.2 34.9 6 13
    5b 62 57 50 0.3 3.8 22.5 64 14 24
    5c 64 56 49 0.9 6.1 35.2 77.2 12 20
    6a 73 72 68 0.5 25 54.4 11 16 24
    6b 77 71 64 0.7 4.3 22.4 47.2 13 23 32
    6c 69 64 57 0.4 8.6 48,5 82 12 21 36

Claims (14)

  1. A method of free radical initiated addition polymerisation of at least one ethylenically unsaturated monomer in which the dispersed phase is stabilised by a surfactant including
    (i) at least one anionic surfactant compound of the formula (I):

            R1-(OA)n-X

    where
    R1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including an unsaturated alkyl group having at least two double bonds
    OA is an oxyalkylene group
    n is from 2 to 60; and
    X is a phosphorus acid group or a salt thereof; and
    (ii) a non-ionic alkoxylated unsaturated alcohol precursor of the surfactant of formula (1)
  2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the group R1 is a C16 to C22 hydrocarbyl group including two double bonds which are conjugated.
  3. A method as claimed in either claim 1 or claim 2 in which the compound of formula (I) is present in a mixture with similar compounds but where the residue corresponding to R1 contains fewer than two double bonds and in which the proportion of multiple unsaturated R1 residues is at least 15 mole %.
  4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the proportion of multiple unsaturated R1 residues is at least 40 mole%.
  5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the group X is a phosphate, O-P-(O)(OH)2 group or a salt thereof.
  6. A method as claimed in claim 5 wherein at least 60% of the surfactant has the group X as a phosphate, O-P-(O)(OH)2 group or a salt thereof.
  7. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the group OA is an oxymethylene group and n is from 5 to 30.
  8. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s) is or includes at least one acrylic monomer.
  9. A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the acrylic monomer(s) represent at least 50% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s).
  10. A method as claimed in claim 8 wherein the acrylic monomer(s) represent at least 75% by weight of the ethylenically unsaturated monomer(s).
  11. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein the amount of anionic surfactant used is from 0.25 to 5 parts by weight surfactant per 100 parts by weight total monomer.
  12. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 1 wherein the temperature of the polymerisation reaction is from 60 to 100°C.
  13. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the non-ionic unsaturated alcohol alkoxylated precursor of the surfactant of formula (I) is added to tailor the properties of the end product polymer.
  14. A method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 13 wherein the end product polymer is a homopolymer such as poly(vinyl acetate), polystyrene and poly (methyl methacrylate), or a copolymer such as ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, acrylic copolymer and styrene/acrylic copolymer, styrene-butadiene rubber and carboxylated styrene-butadiene rubber, butadiene-acrylonitrile rubber and chlorinated polymer such as polychloroprene.
EP98962559A 1997-12-20 1998-12-18 Polymerisation method Expired - Lifetime EP1042370B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9726890 1997-12-20
GBGB9726890.8A GB9726890D0 (en) 1997-12-20 1997-12-20 Polymerisation method
PCT/GB1998/003829 WO1999032522A1 (en) 1997-12-20 1998-12-18 Polymerisation method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1042370A1 EP1042370A1 (en) 2000-10-11
EP1042370B1 true EP1042370B1 (en) 2008-02-13

Family

ID=10823917

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98962559A Expired - Lifetime EP1042370B1 (en) 1997-12-20 1998-12-18 Polymerisation method

Country Status (24)

Country Link
US (2) US6878763B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1042370B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4271849B2 (en)
KR (1) KR100512224B1 (en)
CN (3) CN1285849A (en)
AR (1) AR017441A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE386058T1 (en)
AU (1) AU1769499A (en)
BR (1) BR9813734A (en)
CA (1) CA2313102C (en)
CO (1) CO5050311A1 (en)
DE (1) DE69839129T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1042370T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2299222T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9726890D0 (en)
HK (1) HK1045848A1 (en)
HU (1) HUP0100291A3 (en)
MX (1) MXPA00006031A (en)
MY (1) MY148147A (en)
NO (1) NO20003168L (en)
NZ (1) NZ504985A (en)
PL (1) PL194315B1 (en)
TW (1) TW400336B (en)
WO (1) WO1999032522A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0101771D0 (en) * 2001-01-24 2001-03-07 Ici Plc Anionic surfactants
CA2559129A1 (en) * 2004-03-08 2005-09-15 Kaneka Corporation Method for manufacturing coagulated particles from latex prepared by emulsion polymerization
US20060199877A1 (en) * 2005-03-01 2006-09-07 Sivapackia Ganapathiappan Shear stable latex particles
US7468412B2 (en) * 2005-10-05 2008-12-23 Geo Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Method and composition for the suppression of bloom in peroxide crosslinked polymeric articles
US8252425B2 (en) * 2007-12-12 2012-08-28 Ashland Licensing And Intellectual Property Llc Acrylic emulsion pressure sensitive adhesive composition
GB2462105A (en) 2008-07-24 2010-01-27 Nuplex Resins Bv Thixotropic aqueous coating composition
CN102268115B (en) * 2010-06-02 2015-04-22 武汉强力荷新材料有限公司 Heating-free technology for producing polymer emulsion
KR101698054B1 (en) 2014-12-30 2017-01-19 한국기술교육대학교 산학협력단 Polymer film containing reactive latex molecule
CN109310709A (en) * 2015-12-30 2019-02-05 细胞基因公司 T lymphocyte production method and resulting T lymphocyte
US11795244B2 (en) 2016-08-12 2023-10-24 Dow Global Technologies Llc Surfactant composition
CN112410063B (en) * 2019-08-22 2022-05-24 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Crude oil demulsifier and preparation method and application thereof

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2606178A (en) * 1949-06-18 1952-08-05 Monsanto Chemicals Alkali sulfate salts of ethylene oxide condensation products as emulsifies for styrene polymerization
BE630043A (en) * 1962-08-28
CA1157598A (en) * 1979-10-03 1983-11-22 Paritosh M. Chakrabarti Polyethyleneoxy sulfonate surfactants
US4283321A (en) * 1979-10-03 1981-08-11 Gaf Corporation Alkyl aryl ethyleneoxy sulfonate surfactants for vinyl acetate polymerization
JP3592408B2 (en) * 1995-07-25 2004-11-24 旭電化工業株式会社 Surfactant, emulsifier for emulsion polymerization, dispersant for suspension polymerization and resin modifier
AUPO846297A0 (en) 1997-08-08 1997-09-04 Ici Australia Operations Proprietary Limited Anionic alkoxylate surfactant

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
HUP0100291A1 (en) 2001-05-28
ES2299222T3 (en) 2008-05-16
CA2313102C (en) 2008-12-16
AR017441A1 (en) 2001-09-05
BR9813734A (en) 2000-10-10
MY148147A (en) 2013-03-15
ATE386058T1 (en) 2008-03-15
DK1042370T3 (en) 2008-06-09
NO20003168L (en) 2000-08-10
US6878763B2 (en) 2005-04-12
JP4271849B2 (en) 2009-06-03
MXPA00006031A (en) 2002-09-18
KR100512224B1 (en) 2005-09-05
DE69839129T2 (en) 2009-02-05
WO1999032522A1 (en) 1999-07-01
DE69839129D1 (en) 2008-03-27
US20040225042A1 (en) 2004-11-11
AU1769499A (en) 1999-07-12
CN1346834A (en) 2002-05-01
TW400336B (en) 2000-08-01
HK1045848A1 (en) 2002-12-13
KR20010033326A (en) 2001-04-25
NZ504985A (en) 2003-02-28
CN1667002A (en) 2005-09-14
CN1285849A (en) 2001-02-28
PL341282A1 (en) 2001-04-09
NO20003168D0 (en) 2000-06-19
PL194315B1 (en) 2007-05-31
CA2313102A1 (en) 1999-07-01
HUP0100291A3 (en) 2004-09-28
GB9726890D0 (en) 1998-02-18
US20030092806A1 (en) 2003-05-15
EP1042370A1 (en) 2000-10-11
CO5050311A1 (en) 2001-06-27
JP2001526314A (en) 2001-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6104923B2 (en) Freeze-thaw stability emulsion polymer and novel reactive surfactant for its coating
EP1069139A2 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion, its preparation and use
EP1042370B1 (en) Polymerisation method
EP2144941B1 (en) Polymer and use thereof
JPS58213002A (en) Manufacture of sterically stabilized aqueous polymer dispersion
EP0102707B1 (en) Process for production of sterically stabilised wholly non-charged aqueous polymer dispersions
JP6356121B2 (en) Emulsion polymerization method
AU2006252219B2 (en) Polymerisation method
JP2003212989A (en) Olefinically unsaturated ether carboxylic acid and method for using the same in emulsion polymerization
KR100785987B1 (en) Anionic surfactants
JPH10298210A (en) Activator for emulsion polymerization and production of aqueous polymer by using it
DE19939266B4 (en) Aqueous polymer dispersion, its preparation and use
JP2004331765A (en) Phosphoric ester reactive surfactant
MXPA99007015A (en) Improved emulsion polymerization process utilizing ethylenically unsaturated amine salts of sulfonic, phosphoric and carboxylic acids

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000609

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

TPAD Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS TIPA

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES PLC

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030530

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20030530

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CRODA INTERNATIONAL PLC

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69839129

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080327

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2299222

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080213

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080714

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081114

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: CRODA INTERNATIONAL P.L.C.

Effective date: 20081231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081231

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081231

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081218

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081218

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080514

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20081218

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20141219

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20141219

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20141211

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20141219

Year of fee payment: 17

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20151231

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151219

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20160101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20171221

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20171211

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20171221

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20180123

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69839129

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20181217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20200803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181219