EP0951605B1 - Single-row traffic divider - Google Patents
Single-row traffic divider Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0951605B1 EP0951605B1 EP97935760A EP97935760A EP0951605B1 EP 0951605 B1 EP0951605 B1 EP 0951605B1 EP 97935760 A EP97935760 A EP 97935760A EP 97935760 A EP97935760 A EP 97935760A EP 0951605 B1 EP0951605 B1 EP 0951605B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- barrier
- concrete
- row
- anchor
- vertical
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/04—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of longitudinal beams or rigid strips supported above ground at spaced points
- E01F15/0476—Foundations
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/081—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material
- E01F15/083—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material using concrete
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/088—Details of element connection
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a New Jersey barrier forming a traffic divider made of concrete, and more particularly it relates to such a barrier having improved safety properties compared to barriers used nowadays.
- EP-A-0 459 932 discloses a barrier consisting of light weight modules. These modules are made of a compound of polyester resin fibre, and are not solid, but hollow, in order to allow their filling with different materials, for instance concrete, water, sand, etc., depending on their use. For example the modules are filled with water or any other material easy to pour, when it is required to protect workers carrying out road work. On the contrary, if a rigid and fixed barrier type is required, the modules are assembled by means of roughturned rods and are fixed to the ground by vertical rods.
- the system employed to anchor the barrier to the ground, using vertical rods is different from the present invention, because, even if the vertical rods are incorporated in concrete mortar at their lower end, at their upper end they are rigidly connected to the barrier and do not allow a controlled backward motion of the barrier. Therefore, the impact energy is immediately transmitted to the anchor means (vertical rods).
- this document does not give specific information with regard to the barrier performance in the event of an accident such as the maximum energy absorption, etc.
- This class corresponds to a more restrictive regulation as compared to the prerequisites satisfied by barriers used before and belonging to the same category.
- Another object of the present invention is to improve the connection between the various concrete modules which form the barrier, so as to increase the absorbed collision energy (homologation in the class B3) and reduce at the same time the lateral displacements.
- the modules forming the barrier are provided with means for increasing the resistance of the barrier.
- these means are formed by plates including a bottom and two vertical portions, and joining two adjacent modules to each other, thereby providing increased stiffness.
- the means for increasing the impact resistance of the barrier are realized by modules which do not include a trapezoidal cavity, but are solid, so as to increase the weight of the barrier.
- the means to achieve this consist of vertical bars, which breack under a shearing stress only after the barrier has moved backwards for a predetermined distance. Thus, the upper end of the vertical bar is broken by being "hit" by the withdrawing barrier.
- each module of the barrier has a trapezoidal cavity, then the vertical rods pass through the bottom of said plates and the upper ends of the vertical rods extend inside the trapezoidal cavity.
- each module of the barrier is solid (no trapezoidal cavity)
- the vertical rods pass through housings or boxes arranged at the foot of the barrier, as defined in claim 7.
- the upper end of the vertical rod is located centrally inside said box in order to allow a partially free motion of the barrier under the impact energy, along a predetermined distance.
- the module it is also possible - in the first embodiment - to anchor the module to the ground, at an intermediate position between the module ends.
- recesses are formed on the lower surface of the modules, so that the bottom of the steel plates can be located therein and the friction coefficient between the barrier and the support is increased.
- the barrier 1 is a traffic divider, that is it is interposed between two parallel carriageways.
- the barrier 1 is supported by the curb or support 2 or directly by the pavement.
- a plate of the first kind 3 is arranged below the barrier 1, in a recess provided according to this prefered embodiment on the lower surface of the modules 1',1'', in such a way that the lower surface of the plate 3 is flush (at the same level) with the remaining lower surface of the modules 1', 1", not covered by the plate 3.
- the barrier will not be “lifted” by the plates 3, and the friction coefficient between the barrier and the support 2, is that existing between concrete and the support 2.
- the recess will be oversized compared to the plate 3, allowing an easy assembling of the plate of the first kind 3.
- the lateral walls 4,4' of the plate 3 are received into the opposite lateral cavities or recesses 5, 5' provided on the modules 1', 1" of the barrier 1 at the junction 6.
- the lateral vertical walls 4,4' of the plate 3 of the first kind have two holes 7a,7b, wherein the two opposite holes 7a are used to insert a cross bolt 8a, whereas the two opposite holes 7b of the plate 3, are used to insert a second cross bolt 8b.
- the bolt 8a passes through the end of the module 1", whereas the other bolt 8b passes through the other module 1'.
- the bolts 8a, 8b are introduced into through holes which already exist in the conventional barriers, but in the latter barriers the connection is effected by means of two separate lateral plates, whose role is now played, according to the present invention, by the lateral walls 4,4' integral with the bottom 9 of the plate of the first kind 3. In this way the connection is more rigid and the play between the parts is reduced.
- the plate 3 has two lateral extensions 10,10' which in this embodiment are rectangular and which are provided with slots 11, 11'.
- the barrier 1 moves backwards, until the vertical rod 12 abuts on the edge of the slot 11 or 11', that is the plate 3; at this moment, the vertical rod 12 breaks under the shearing stress, after having absorbed a certain amount of energy, and the barrier may move further backwards.
- the present invention therefore proposes to use a plate 3 which has several functions:
- the conventional concrete barrier has a central trapezoidal cavity 20 extending almost to the junction (see Fig. 2). This cavity 20 receives the nuts 14 of the vertical rods 12.
- the vertical rod 12 which may be longer in this case, must be inserted in a rigid device allowing however its impact failure under a shearing stress.
- FIGs 7, 8, 9 show a steel plate of the second kind 21.
- the steel plate of the second kind 21 has a central slot 22 on its bottom 23 and two lateral walls 24,24', each of them having a pair of holes 25a, 25b. It is also received in a recess on the lower surface of the barrier, as in the case of the plate of the first kind 3. The depth of the recess exceeds the thickness of the bottom 23.
- This plate 21 is preferably assembled at the middle of a module of the barrier 1 and is used as an additional anchor means of the barrier (Fig.3).
- the length l 2 of the plates of the second kind 21 is slightly greater than the distance l 1 between the lateral walls 4,4' of the plates of the first kind 3.
- a vertical anchor bar 40 is introduced into the central slot 22 of the plate of the second kind 21, and is embedded in the concrete of the curb 2.
- the nut 50 is screwed on the upper end of the vertical rod 40, but it is not screwed tight against the washer 51 which lays on the bottom 23 of the plate 21 of the second kind.
- the bar 40 has a predetermined resistance against breaking caused by impacts.
- two different plates of the second kind 21 may be mounted on the same module, each one at a distance of (6,20/3) metres from the corresponding junction.
- the shape and thickness of the plates, the length of the vertical rods and their arrangement, shape of the slots and their arrangement, a.s.o., are parameters which vary according to the application.
- the barrier consists of different modules 1''', like the one shown in figs. 10 and 11, comprising a male head 60' and a female head 60.
- this barrier is not formed with an inner trapezoidal cavity, but it is solid (see Figs. 12a to 12d) and has a specific weight > 2,7 kg/dm(3). Moreover, its height is ⁇ 1 m, and preferably it varies between 1 m and 1,05 m.
- the increased weight of the barrier produces shorter lateral displacements during the collision, due to friction between the concrete and, for instance, the bituminous conglomerate.
- Fig. 12b which is a cross section along line H-H of Fig. 10
- recesses 62 at the foot (toe) of the barrier, which are alternately formed on one or the other side of the module 1'''.
- an anchor system like the one shown in Fig.15, formed by a steel box-like element 63, comprising an upper plate portion 64 and a lower plate portion 65.
- the lines 66,66' are the steel reinforcements of the concrete material forming the module 1''', at the recess region 62.
- Vertical rods with a helical end are introduced into the ground or in a previously realized bore obtained in the bituminous conglomerate of the support 2, in case the latter is made of a bituminous conglomerate.
- the helical end allows a stable connection to the ground or the bituminous mix, in general to the support 2, moreover, these vertical rods (not shown) are provided at their upper end with a nut which will be received in the box-like element 63, which is arranged in the recess 62.
- the nut will be located at the center of the box 63, and the barrier will be allowed to move almost freely (some centimetres) backwards, during the impact, before the nut abuts the walls of the box 63, thereby permitting energy absorption by the vertical rod (whose function is the same as that of the bars 12) and its subsequent possible breaking caused by the shearing stress.
- the way the vertical bar is anchored to the support 2 may be of any kind known to a skilled person. For instance, it is possible to employ a resin contained inside a cartridge, so that when the latter breaks the resin can harden; etc.
- Fig. 14 shows how the connection is performed using a screw coupling 74.
- bars 71 having a diameter of about 28 mm are employed, which is greater than that of conventional bars of this kind.
- a handrail fixed by means of montesi bars or the like 85 employs a handrail fixed by means of montesi bars or the like 85.
- the barrier has no central trapezoidal cavity, that is it is solid.
- the specific weight is > 2.7 kg/dm(3).
- the barrier height is in this case approximately equal to 1m, and that of the handrail can be 35 cm, for example.
- the handrail 80 is provided for the purpose of preventing a vehicle with a center of gravity located at a height of 1,60 m, from "getting over" the barrier.
- Figs. 19-21 show an alternative way of fixing the handrail.
- a montesi bar is introduced in the hole 90 shown in Fig. 18.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Devices Affording Protection Of Roads Or Walls For Sound Insulation (AREA)
- Manufacturing Of Tubular Articles Or Embedded Moulded Articles (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a New Jersey barrier forming a traffic divider made of concrete, and more particularly it relates to such a barrier having improved safety properties compared to barriers used nowadays.
- Known barriers having all features contained in the preamble of
claim 1, and which are considered the prior art, do not satisfy the requirements of safety barriers specified below. - EP-A-0 459 932 discloses a barrier consisting of light weight modules. These modules are made of a compound of polyester resin fibre, and are not solid, but hollow, in order to allow their filling with different materials, for instance concrete, water, sand, etc., depending on their use. For example the modules are filled with water or any other material easy to pour, when it is required to protect workers carrying out road work. On the contrary, if a rigid and fixed barrier type is required, the modules are assembled by means of roughturned rods and are fixed to the ground by vertical rods. However, the system employed to anchor the barrier to the ground, using vertical rods, is different from the present invention, because, even if the vertical rods are incorporated in concrete mortar at their lower end, at their upper end they are rigidly connected to the barrier and do not allow a controlled backward motion of the barrier. Therefore, the impact energy is immediately transmitted to the anchor means (vertical rods).
- Moreover, this document does not give specific information with regard to the barrier performance in the event of an accident such as the maximum energy absorption, etc.
- It is known that the three fundamental prerequisites to which road barriers must conform, are the following :
- a) they must absorb a predetermined impact energy;
- b) they must prevent vehicles whose center of gravity is located at a height lower than a given value, from "jumping over" the barrier;
- c) for cars, ASI ≤ 1, that is the decelerations must not be dangerous for the passengers.
-
- An object of the present invention is to realize New Jersey barriers made of concrete, constituting traffic dividers, included in the so-called class B3, according to which the energy thereshold is ≥ 600 kJ, the center of gravity of the vehicle may reach a height of H = 1.60 m without risk of "jumping over", and ASI ≤ 1, for cars up to 900 kg.
- This class corresponds to a more restrictive regulation as compared to the prerequisites satisfied by barriers used before and belonging to the same category.
- Another object of the present invention is to improve the connection between the various concrete modules which form the barrier, so as to increase the absorbed collision energy (homologation in the class B3) and reduce at the same time the lateral displacements.
- In order to provide a barrier which can be included in the B3 class, according to the present invention, the modules forming the barrier are provided with means for increasing the resistance of the barrier.
- According to a first alternative, these means are formed by plates including a bottom and two vertical portions, and joining two adjacent modules to each other, thereby providing increased stiffness.
- According to a second alternative, the means for increasing the impact resistance of the barrier, are realized by modules which do not include a trapezoidal cavity, but are solid, so as to increase the weight of the barrier.
- Notwithstanding the increased stiffness and impact resistance of the barrier, the latter should be able to effect a partially free backward movement, along a certain distance, in order to absorb energy in a controlled manner (ASI less than 1). The means to achieve this, consist of vertical bars, which breack under a shearing stress only after the barrier has moved backwards for a predetermined distance. Thus, the upper end of the vertical bar is broken by being "hit" by the withdrawing barrier.
- If each module of the barrier has a trapezoidal cavity, then the vertical rods pass through the bottom of said plates and the upper ends of the vertical rods extend inside the trapezoidal cavity.
- Instead, if each module of the barrier is solid (no trapezoidal cavity), then the vertical rods pass through housings or boxes arranged at the foot of the barrier, as defined in claim 7. The upper end of the vertical rod is located centrally inside said box in order to allow a partially free motion of the barrier under the impact energy, along a predetermined distance.
- It is also possible - in the first embodiment - to anchor the module to the ground, at an intermediate position between the module ends. Preferably, recesses are formed on the lower surface of the modules, so that the bottom of the steel plates can be located therein and the friction coefficient between the barrier and the support is increased.
- The present invention will now be described for illustrative and non limitative purposes, with reference to the annexed schematic drawings, wherein:
- Fig.1 is a cross secional view of the barrier along the line A-A of Fig.2, according to a first embodiment of the invention;
- Fig.2 is a longitudinal cross sectional view, along line B-B of Fig.1;
- Fig.3 is a cross sectional view of the barrier corresponding to Fig.1, wherein the cross section is taken however at the center of the module;
- Fig.4 is a plan view of a first type of steel plate forming part of the connection device, for the junction heads between two adjacent barriers;
- Fig.5 is a view of the plate of Fig.4 in the direction of the arrow C;
- Fig.6 is a cross sectional view along line D-D of Fig.4;
- Fig.7 is a plan view of a second type of steel plate to be mounted on the center of the module or in another position on the latter;
- Fig.8 is a side view along the arrow E of Fig.7;
- Fig.9 is a sectional view along the line F-F of Fig.7;
- Fig.10 is a side view of a second embodiment of the barrier;
- Fig.11 is a plan view of Fig.10;
- Figs. 12a-12d are sectional views respectively taken along the lines G-G, H-H, and L-L of Fig. 10;
- Fig.13 shows the horizontal section of the junction between two concrete modules, taken along the foot (toe) of the barrier;
- Fig.14 is a plan view of the junction between two modules;
- Fig.15 is a perspective view of a detail of the anchor system for connecting the barrier to the ground, pavement or curb;
- Fig.16 is a cross sectional view of a barrier corresponding to a third possible embodiment, taken at a point distant from the upright of the handrail and from the anchor means, which are also part of the invention;
- Fig.17 is a cross section similar to Fig. 16, taken along the upright of the handrail;
- Fig.18 is a cross section similar to Fig.17, before assembling of the handrail;
- Figs. 19, 20 are views analogous to Figs. 16, 17, however with a different assembling system for the handrail;
- Fig. 21 is a view along line N-N of Fig. 21.
Referring to Figs. 1 and 2 and to Figs. 4, 5, 6,
number 1 denotes a concrete New Jersey barrier. -
- The
barrier 1 is a traffic divider, that is it is interposed between two parallel carriageways. - The
barrier 1 is supported by the curb or support 2 or directly by the pavement. - A plate of the
first kind 3 is arranged below thebarrier 1, in a recess provided according to this prefered embodiment on the lower surface of the modules 1',1'', in such a way that the lower surface of theplate 3 is flush (at the same level) with the remaining lower surface of themodules 1', 1", not covered by theplate 3. There follows that the barrier will not be "lifted" by theplates 3, and the friction coefficient between the barrier and thesupport 2, is that existing between concrete and thesupport 2. - The recess will be oversized compared to the
plate 3, allowing an easy assembling of the plate of thefirst kind 3. - The
lateral walls 4,4' of theplate 3 are received into the opposite lateral cavities orrecesses 5, 5' provided on themodules 1', 1" of thebarrier 1 at thejunction 6. As shown in Fig. 5, the lateralvertical walls 4,4' of theplate 3 of the first kind, have twoholes 7a,7b, wherein the twoopposite holes 7a are used to insert across bolt 8a, whereas the two opposite holes 7b of theplate 3, are used to insert asecond cross bolt 8b. - The
bolt 8a passes through the end of themodule 1", whereas theother bolt 8b passes through the other module 1'. Thebolts lateral walls 4,4' integral with thebottom 9 of the plate of thefirst kind 3. In this way the connection is more rigid and the play between the parts is reduced. Moreover, theplate 3 has twolateral extensions 10,10' which in this embodiment are rectangular and which are provided withslots 11, 11'. - As shown in the Figs. 1 and 2, through the
slots 11, 11'vertical rods 12 are introduced which are embedded in the concrete of thecurb 2 according to known methods (making use of a resin which can harden or of mortar). Awasher 13 is put on theplate 3, on theslots 11, 11', and anut 14 is screwed at the upper end of eachvertical rod 12. However, thesenuts 14 are left slack, that is they are not screwed tight against thewasher 14 and theplate 3; this is done in order to ensure the correct operation of the barrier forming the traffic divider, as explained hereinafter. - When the vehicle collides with the
barrier 1, the latter moves backwards, until thevertical rod 12 abuts on the edge of theslot 11 or 11', that is theplate 3; at this moment, thevertical rod 12 breaks under the shearing stress, after having absorbed a certain amount of energy, and the barrier may move further backwards. - The present invention therefore proposes to use a
plate 3 which has several functions: - anchoring to the curb or pavement by means of rods 12 (not provided for by conventional barriers);
- stiffening of the junction and elimination of the
play, obtained by means of the
bottom 9 of theplate 3 connecting thelateral walls 4,4'of theplate 3; - "controlled" backward movement of the barrier at the
junction region obtained by means of the
vertical rods 12 with a predetermined impact failure. - As can be seen in Fig.3, the conventional concrete barrier has a central
trapezoidal cavity 20 extending almost to the junction (see Fig. 2). Thiscavity 20 receives thenuts 14 of thevertical rods 12. - If the barriers are not laid on a concrete curb, but directly on the pavement or on the ground, the
vertical rod 12, which may be longer in this case, must be inserted in a rigid device allowing however its impact failure under a shearing stress. - Figures 7, 8, 9 show a steel plate of the
second kind 21. The steel plate of thesecond kind 21 has acentral slot 22 on its bottom 23 and twolateral walls 24,24', each of them having a pair ofholes 25a, 25b. It is also received in a recess on the lower surface of the barrier, as in the case of the plate of thefirst kind 3. The depth of the recess exceeds the thickness of the bottom 23. - This
plate 21 is preferably assembled at the middle of a module of thebarrier 1 and is used as an additional anchor means of the barrier (Fig.3). - Since
concrete barriers 1 used nowadays as traffic dividers do not have anyrecesses 5,5' on the middle portion of a module, the length l2 of the plates of thesecond kind 21 is slightly greater than the distance l1 between thelateral walls 4,4' of the plates of thefirst kind 3. - Four double expansion screw anchors 30 are introduced into the four
holes 25a, 25b of the twovertical walls 24, 24' and in fourhorizontal holes 31 drilled in the module of thebarrier 1. In a manner similar to the above procedure described for the case of the assembling of the plates of thefirst kind 3, avertical anchor bar 40 is introduced into thecentral slot 22 of the plate of thesecond kind 21, and is embedded in the concrete of thecurb 2. Thenut 50 is screwed on the upper end of thevertical rod 40, but it is not screwed tight against thewasher 51 which lays on the bottom 23 of theplate 21 of the second kind. - The operation is analogous to the previously described one. However in the present case the plate acts only as anchor means and therefore it is narrower, since it must not connect two separate modules to each other.
- Also the
bar 40 has a predetermined resistance against breaking caused by impacts. - If desired, two different plates of the
second kind 21 may be mounted on the same module, each one at a distance of (6,20/3) metres from the corresponding junction. - It is obvious that the present embodiment of the invention can be realized with few changes in the existing barriers, and notwithstanding this fact, it allows an adaptation to the new body of rules, which specify high containment energies, but reduced displacement during the collision (crash) test. Obviously, concrete barriers could be made in the future in such a way to include
recesses 5 also in the middle portion of a modular element or in other regions away from its ends, in order to receive the lateral walls of a plate of the second kind, having however a length l1 <l2 , wherein (l2 -l1 )/2 is substantially equal to the recess depth. - In particular, the shape and thickness of the plates, the length of the vertical rods and their arrangement, shape of the slots and their arrangement, a.s.o., are parameters which vary according to the application.
- With reference to Figs. 10-15, a second embodiment of the invention is described.
- The barrier consists of different modules 1''', like the one shown in figs. 10 and 11, comprising a male head 60' and a
female head 60. According to the invention , this barrier is not formed with an inner trapezoidal cavity, but it is solid (see Figs. 12a to 12d) and has a specific weight > 2,7 kg/dm(3). Moreover, its height is ≥ 1 m, and preferably it varies between 1 m and 1,05 m. The increased weight of the barrier produces shorter lateral displacements during the collision, due to friction between the concrete and, for instance, the bituminous conglomerate. - As shown in Fig. 12b, which is a cross section along line H-H of Fig. 10, there are provided
recesses 62 at the foot (toe) of the barrier, which are alternately formed on one or the other side of the module 1'''. In eachrecess 62 is mounted an anchor system like the one shown in Fig.15, formed by a steel box-like element 63, comprising anupper plate portion 64 and alower plate portion 65. - The
lines 66,66'are the steel reinforcements of the concrete material forming the module 1''', at therecess region 62. Vertical rods with a helical end are introduced into the ground or in a previously realized bore obtained in the bituminous conglomerate of thesupport 2, in case the latter is made of a bituminous conglomerate. - The helical end allows a stable connection to the ground or the bituminous mix, in general to the
support 2, moreover, these vertical rods (not shown) are provided at their upper end with a nut which will be received in the box-like element 63, which is arranged in therecess 62. The nut will be located at the center of thebox 63, and the barrier will be allowed to move almost freely (some centimetres) backwards, during the impact, before the nut abuts the walls of thebox 63, thereby permitting energy absorption by the vertical rod (whose function is the same as that of the bars 12) and its subsequent possible breaking caused by the shearing stress. The way the vertical bar is anchored to thesupport 2 may be of any kind known to a skilled person. For instance, it is possible to employ a resin contained inside a cartridge, so that when the latter breaks the resin can harden; etc. - As shown in Fig. 12a, at the junction between the two heads, separate
vertical plates 70,70' are employed, as for the case of conventional barriers, that is, nosingle plate 3 connecting them is provided, as in the first embodiment. However, also in this second embodiment, it could be possible to use theplates 3. Referring to Figs. 10,11,12c, 12d, it can be noted that thehorizontal bar 71, diwidag, montesi or the like, projecting with both threaded ends 72 from the concrete module 1''', may be bent more easily compared to conventional bars, at said ends 72, since near the latter ends the bar can laterally move inside the coaxial holes orseats 73 which have an oversize diameter compared to that of the bar 71 (see also Fig. 12c). - Therefore, when both threaded ends 72 of the male-female heads of the modules 1''' must be connected by means of a screw coupling, the connection can be realized also when the two modules 1''' are not perfectly aligned. This feature ensures that the assembling is realized accurately.
- Fig. 14 shows how the connection is performed using a
screw coupling 74. - In the present embodiment, bars 71 having a diameter of about 28 mm are employed, which is greater than that of conventional bars of this kind.
- Referring to Figs. 16-18, an embodiment is shown, which employs a handrail fixed by means of montesi bars or the like 85. In this case too, the barrier has no central trapezoidal cavity, that is it is solid. The specific weight is > 2.7 kg/dm(3). The barrier height is in this case approximately equal to 1m, and that of the handrail can be 35 cm, for example. The
handrail 80 is provided for the purpose of preventing a vehicle with a center of gravity located at a height of 1,60 m, from "getting over" the barrier. - Figs. 19-21 show an alternative way of fixing the handrail.
- In Fig. 17, a montesi bar is introduced in the
hole 90 shown in Fig. 18.
Claims (11)
- Single-row concrete New Jersey barrier used as a traffic divider, comprising a plurality of single concrete modules (1',1",1''') connected by vertical steel plates (4,4' and 70,70') and cross bolts (8a,8b) passing through male and female junction heads of the concrete modules (1',1",1'''), characterized in that anchor means are provided in order to rigidly connect the barrier to a support (2), in the form of vertical bars (12,40) allowing a partially free backward motion of the barrier and an impact energy absorption, and breaking under a shearing stress when impact energy exceeds a certain predetermined value, the barrier further comprising means to increase the resistance thereof, which are either formed by said vertical steel plates (4,4') being integral with the bottom portion (9) of a plate (3) of the first kind extending below both male-female heads of two contiguous concrete modules (1,1'), or by concrete modules (1',1'',1''') which are solid, that is have no trapezoidal cavity, to increase barrier weight.
- Single-row barrier according to claim 1, characterized in that said bottom portion (9) of a plate (3) of the first kind is received in a recess provided on a lower surface of the barrier, in the region of the junction between the two heads, so as to be flush with the remaining lower surface of the concrete made barrier.
- Single-row barrier according to claim 1 and 2, characterized in that in extensions (10,10') of the bottom portion (9) slots (11,11') are provided wherein the vertical anchor bars (12) are introduced, said bars breaking under a predetermined impact energy and the head (50) of said vertical bars (12) protruding inside a longitudinal trapezoidal cavity (20) of the barrier.
- Single-row barrier according to claim 1, characterized in that between the junction heads of each modular element (1',1"), C-shaped plates (21) are mounted whose bottom (23) has a slot (22) to allow the passage of the vertical anchor bar (40) for fixing to the barrier support, said anchor bar (40) breaking under a predetermined impact energy, whereas the vertical walls (24,24') of the C-shaped plates (21) are connected to the concrete material of the barrier (1) by means of double expansion screw anchors or other fixing means.
- Single-row barrier according to claim 4, characterized in that the bottom (23) of said C-shaped plate (21) is received in a recess provided on a lower surface of the barrier, in a region between both junction heads, in such a way that the lower surface of the C-shaped steel plate (21) is flush or located at a slightly higher level compared to the remaining lower surface of the barrier, which is made of concrete.
- Single-row barrier used as a traffic divider according to claims 3,4,5, characterized in that the anchor bars (12,40) are embedded in the concrete of the support (2) or inserted in a rigid device introduced in the support (2) in order to allow, in any case, the breaking under a shearing stress of the bars (12;40).
- Single-row barrier used as a traffic divider according to claim 1, characterized in that it is formed by a body which is solid, that is without cavities having a trapezoidal section, and in that it has a specific weight >2.7kg/dm(3), a height up to 1.05 m, and housings (63) to receive the anchor means, arranged at the foot or toe of the barrier, preferably at both sides of the same.
- Single-row barrier according to claim 7, characterized in that said housings (63) receiving the anchor means, are boxes mounted inside recesses or cavities (62) at the foot or toe of the barrier, and in that the head of the anchor means which form vertical bars, is located centrally inside a box(63), in order to allow an almost free movement of the barrier, until the wall of the box (23), after the impact, causes breaking of the anchor bar head under the shearing stress.
- Single-row barrier according to claims 7 and 8, characterized in that it comprises a handrail (80) which is connected to the upper end of the barrier.
- Single-row barrier according to claims 7,8,9, characterized in that the height of the handrail (80) preferably does not exceed 35 cm.
- Single-row barrier according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that a longitudinal bar (71) which is incorporated in the upper region of the concrete module (1'''), can be freely bent at its ends (72) in order to facilitate the connection to other modular elements (1'''), this being allowed by providing holes (73) coaxial with the bar (71) at the ends of the modular element, so as to permit small transverse displacements of the bar (71) inside said holes (73).
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IT96RM000744 IT1286368B1 (en) | 1996-10-31 | 1996-10-31 | NEW JERSEY CLASS B3 SINGLE-LINE TRAFFIC BARRIER IN CONCRETE RESISTANT TO GREATER IMPACT ENERGIES AND SUCH AS TO PREVENT |
ITRM960744 | 1996-10-31 | ||
PCT/IT1997/000196 WO1998019015A1 (en) | 1996-10-31 | 1997-07-30 | Single-row traffic divider |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0951605A1 EP0951605A1 (en) | 1999-10-27 |
EP0951605B1 true EP0951605B1 (en) | 2002-04-03 |
Family
ID=11404502
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP97935760A Expired - Lifetime EP0951605B1 (en) | 1996-10-31 | 1997-07-30 | Single-row traffic divider |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0951605B1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU3863697A (en) |
DE (1) | DE69711701T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2175447T3 (en) |
IT (1) | IT1286368B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1998019015A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT1302420B1 (en) * | 1998-08-05 | 2000-09-05 | Autostrade Concess Const | DEVICES FOR THE CALIBRATION DECELERATION OF URTANT VEHICLES FOR NEW JERSEY PROFILE SAFETY BARRIERS WITH ANCHORING |
IT1302427B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2000-09-05 | Autostrade Concess Const | ROAD SAFETY BARRIER FROM NEW JERSEY PROFILE SCORING WITH DEVICES FOR THE CALIBRATED DECELERATION OF HURRYING VEHICLES. |
WO2000065156A1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2000-11-02 | Maba Fertigteilindustrie Gmbh | Guide wall for traffic routes |
DE19933401B4 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2005-06-09 | Spig Schutzplanken-Produktions-Gesellschaft Mbh & Co Kg | Anchoring for a post |
DE10008596A1 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2001-08-16 | Sps Schutzplanken Gmbh | Steel safety barrier for roadways, especially on bridges, has foot elements with fastening arrangement releasable damage-free in event of impact with predetermined shock force, and allows movement of safety barrier |
GB2377949B (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2005-07-20 | Poundfield Products Ltd | Apparatus and method for constructing a freestanding wall |
AT413711B (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2006-05-15 | Maba Fertigteilind Gmbh | CONCRETE WALL ELEMENT |
NL1020420C2 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-10-21 | Laura Metaal Eygelshoven B V | Barrier element. |
GB0418695D0 (en) * | 2004-08-21 | 2004-09-22 | Milbury Systems Ltd | Prestressed concrete wall units |
AT502935B1 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2008-03-15 | Maba Fertigteilind Gmbh | guide wall |
ITAN20090010U1 (en) * | 2009-04-27 | 2010-10-28 | Arnaldo Sorci | PROTECTIVE LOCKING BRACKET |
AT509359B1 (en) * | 2010-01-21 | 2012-02-15 | Rebloc Gmbh | DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SURFACES |
EP2472007B8 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2015-03-11 | Strabag Ag | Bridge-roadway separation system and method for producing same |
CZ2010773A3 (en) * | 2010-10-22 | 2012-05-02 | Cs-Beton, S. R. O. | Device for mutual coupling two parts of crash barrier and method of coupling such parts with each other |
DE202011005689U1 (en) | 2011-04-28 | 2011-09-12 | Eurovia Beton Gmbh | Vehicle restraint system |
ES2400880B1 (en) * | 2011-08-01 | 2014-05-13 | Rebeca CHANCOSA DEL CASAR | EMPOTRATION DEVICE FOR POSTS OR BACCLES IN THE PUBLIC ROAD |
ITRA20130027A1 (en) * | 2013-12-17 | 2014-03-18 | Intergeos Srl | DWG DUMPER |
US10837150B2 (en) * | 2015-12-07 | 2020-11-17 | Spirit Of America Corporation | Stackable compact high threat barrier |
CN106192817B (en) * | 2016-08-29 | 2018-11-06 | 童杨益 | One kind can disconnect safety traffic guardrail automatically |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4502812A (en) * | 1982-09-27 | 1985-03-05 | Stanley Zucker | Roadway barrier and restraining cap combination |
US4844652A (en) * | 1988-06-06 | 1989-07-04 | Schrougham Benton | Self-aligning curbing modules |
ES2024280A6 (en) * | 1990-05-29 | 1992-02-16 | Garcia Ballesteros Angel | Improvements in safety barriers for roads. |
DE29606934U1 (en) * | 1995-04-21 | 1996-08-14 | Spacek, Zdenek, Brno | Interchangeable lane boundaries |
-
1996
- 1996-10-31 IT IT96RM000744 patent/IT1286368B1/en active IP Right Grant
-
1997
- 1997-07-30 DE DE69711701T patent/DE69711701T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-07-30 ES ES97935760T patent/ES2175447T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-07-30 EP EP97935760A patent/EP0951605B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-07-30 AU AU38636/97A patent/AU3863697A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-07-30 WO PCT/IT1997/000196 patent/WO1998019015A1/en active IP Right Grant
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU3863697A (en) | 1998-05-22 |
ITRM960744A1 (en) | 1998-05-01 |
EP0951605A1 (en) | 1999-10-27 |
IT1286368B1 (en) | 1998-07-08 |
WO1998019015A1 (en) | 1998-05-07 |
DE69711701T2 (en) | 2002-11-28 |
ES2175447T3 (en) | 2002-11-16 |
DE69711701D1 (en) | 2002-05-08 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0951605B1 (en) | Single-row traffic divider | |
US6203242B1 (en) | Crash barrier and barrier elements | |
US5156485A (en) | Low profile concrete road barrier | |
CA2007867C (en) | Advanced dynamic impact extension module | |
US7198426B2 (en) | Prefabricated road median wall | |
CA2278232C (en) | Barrier device | |
US6840706B1 (en) | Multipurpose road barrier, having a double dampening-resistant effect | |
US7600942B2 (en) | Barrier device with adjustable external reinforcement structure | |
KR101633431B1 (en) | Expandable bridge sidewalk and it's construction method | |
WO2000008259A1 (en) | Devices for calibrating the deceleration of colliding vehicles | |
WO2000008258A1 (en) | Traffic divider for calibrating the deceleration of vehicles upon impact | |
JPH02157308A (en) | Concrete protecting wall | |
KR100595380B1 (en) | Prefabricated temporary protective wall | |
JPS6012484B2 (en) | road protection barrier | |
KR100384521B1 (en) | Guard rail and central separator capable of being used as bridge railing | |
EP1861548B1 (en) | Impact resisting post | |
CN110258326A (en) | Prefabricated PC urban viaduct anticollision barrier | |
CN215857204U (en) | Assembled guardrail | |
AU2011213821A1 (en) | A barrier element and a barrier assembly | |
KR200317919Y1 (en) | A reinforcing construction for the bridge's guide | |
KR200160931Y1 (en) | Structure of an assembly median strip | |
WO2001046525A1 (en) | Apparatus for covering vehicle traffic dividers | |
CN221895655U (en) | Anti-collision guardrail | |
JP3306587B2 (en) | Buffer type fence | |
EP3924551B1 (en) | Anchorless crash cushion apparatus with midnose stabilizing structure |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19990419 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR GR |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20010518 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE ES FR GR |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 69711701 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20020508 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20020402120 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2175447 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20030106 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: TP Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CD Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: CA |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20150618 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20150529 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150721 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150630 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 69711701 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: ML Ref document number: 20020402120 Country of ref document: GR Effective date: 20170207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160801 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170207 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20180507 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160731 |