[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP0868267A2 - Oval frame razor - Google Patents

Oval frame razor

Info

Publication number
EP0868267A2
EP0868267A2 EP96940415A EP96940415A EP0868267A2 EP 0868267 A2 EP0868267 A2 EP 0868267A2 EP 96940415 A EP96940415 A EP 96940415A EP 96940415 A EP96940415 A EP 96940415A EP 0868267 A2 EP0868267 A2 EP 0868267A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
blade unit
blade
unit according
skin contacting
contacting surface
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP96940415A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0868267B1 (en
Inventor
Frank Edward Brown
Brian Oldroyd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Gillette Co LLC
Original Assignee
Gillette Co LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=10783688&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0868267(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Gillette Co LLC filed Critical Gillette Co LLC
Publication of EP0868267A2 publication Critical patent/EP0868267A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0868267B1 publication Critical patent/EP0868267B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B26HAND CUTTING TOOLS; CUTTING; SEVERING
    • B26BHAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B26B21/00Razors of the open or knife type; Safety razors or other shaving implements of the planing type; Hair-trimming devices involving a razor-blade; Equipment therefor

Definitions

  • This invention relates to safety razors of the kind having a blade unit carried by a handle, the blade unit including an elongate blade with a rectilinear sharpened edge, or a plurality of such blades with parallel edges.
  • the blade unit may be fixedly mounted on the handle with the intention that the entire razor be discarded when the blade edge or edges have become dulled.
  • the blade unit can be detachably connected to the handle to enable replacement of a used blade unit with a fresh blade unit.
  • Replaceable blade units are commonly referred to as cartridges.
  • the present invention is aimed specifically at a blade unit for body shaving, primarily in the axillary area.
  • a blade unit for body shaving primarily in the axillary area.
  • Razors intended for use by ladies who do commonly shave their axillae, and like other razors there has been a strong trend towards making the blade units of these female razors with a narrow rectangular configuration as mentioned above. It has become the accepted thinking within the art that such blade units of narrow dimensions are especially beneficial for shaving the axillae since they will more readily fit into the rather deep concave socket of the axilla.
  • the present invention makes a significant departure from this current thinking in the shaving field and goes directly against all recent developments in this technical area as regards blade unit dimensions.
  • shaving tests have shown that not only can a blade unit of relatively large dimensions at least equal the shaving effectiveness of the smaller prior art blade units when shaving the axillae, but large blade units can be shaped to conform to the axilla region of the body so that shaving performance is not diminished, and that in terms of overall comfort large blade units have a superior performance to the prior art blade units and are preferred by users.
  • a razor blade unit according to the invention has a length not greater than 60mm, preferably not greater than 50mm, and a length in the range of 40 to 45mm is preferred.
  • the width of the blade unit is preferably such that the aspect ratio, namely the ratio of the overall length to the overall width measured perpendicular to the blade, is in the range of 1 to 4, and in most of the preferred embodiments of the invention the aspect ratio is from 1.5 to 2.8, and more precisely in the range of 2.0 to 2.5. In the preferred embodiments the width of the blade unit is in the range of 12 to 23mm, in particular 15 to 20mm.
  • Guard and cap surfaces are defined in front of and behind the blade or blades for contact with the skin in front of and behind the blade or blades during shaving, and preferably each of the guard and cap surfaces has a width of not less than 4.0mm, at least where the width of the blade unit is at a maximum.
  • the guard and cap each has a skin contact area which is preferably not less than 140mm , and the combined skin contact areas of the cap and guard are preferably at least 400mm , and most preferably in the
  • the skin contacting surface is made convex. It is important to understand that the word "convex" as used in the present specification does not necessarily mean that the skin contacting surface is smoothly curved and it implies only that the guard and cap surfaces extend upwardly in the direction from their edges remote from the blade or blades so that the blade edge or edges are at a level above the remote edges of the cap and guard surfaces.
  • a straight line joining the outer and inner limits of each of the guard and cap surfaces is inclined at an angle of at least 5°, and possibly up to 25°, to a plane which is tangential to the skin contacting surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blades.
  • the angle of inclination is in the range of 10 to 20 degrees, and more specifically substantially equal to 15°.
  • the blade unit is preferably shaped to make at least three point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle having a diameter of from 30 to 100mm, and preferably of about 50mm whereby it will be ensured that the blade unit convexity will at least approximately conform to that of the axilla.
  • blade unit defines a large area over which contact can be made with the skin during shaving, and a circumscribing perimeter extending about the skin contacting surface confines an area, referred to hereinafter as the "footprint area",
  • the most preferred footprint area is in the range of 600-750mm , and more specifically between 650 and 720mm 2 .
  • a sharp angled corner may be considered to be an angle less than about 120° with a radius of curvature less than around 3mm.
  • the curvature at any corner is at least 5mm.
  • the "circularity" of a two dimensional shape is a convenient way of relating the area enclosed by its perimeter to the length of the perimeter, and expressing it in terms of a percentage compared with a circle which always provides the maximum area for any given perimeter length.
  • the circularity for any shape is defined by the equation:
  • Circulatory A x 4 ⁇ x 100 P 2
  • Razor blade units according to the present invention have a circularity not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the skin contacting area and having corner radii of 30% of said width.
  • the circularity is greater than that of a rectangle with the same overall length and width and rounded corners with radii equal to 10% of the length.
  • the lower limit (a) will apply, although even in the case of these blade units it is preferable that the circularity also exceeds limit (b) .
  • Acceptable oval blade units with an aspect ratio above 3.25 may have a circularity of less than 65%.
  • Preferred embodiments with aspect ratios below about 2.75 have a circularity greater than 70%, and more particularly in the order of 80%.
  • Typical prior art blade units have a circularity of less than 65%.
  • the comparatively large circularity of a blade unit according to the invention can be achieved with rounded corners at the ends of the blade unit with relatively large radii of curvature of at least 6mm, or with oval, elliptical or polygonal shapes which need not necessarily be symmetrical.
  • a razor blade unit comprising at least one elongate blade having a rectilinear sharpened edge and mounted in a substantially inflexible carrier, a skin contacting surface surrounding the blade edge(s) and including guard and cap surfaces on opposite sides of the blade edge(s), the aspect ratio of the length to width of the skin contacting surface being in the range of from 1 to 4, as seen in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edge(s) the skin contacting surface being convex, the overall length of the blade unit at the skin contacting surface being not greater than 60mm, the skin contacting surface having a circumscribing perimeter confining a footprint area of at least 450mm , and the circumscribing perimeter being so shaped that the footprint area confined by said perimeter has a circularity (as herein above defined) not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the footprint area of the skin
  • a razor equipped with a blade unit as described above has been found in shave tests to achieve a significantly improved overall performance in shaving the axilla and has also been found to be very effective in shaving other body areas, such as the legs. It should be understood that unless otherwise stated, all dimensions and areas quoted herein are measured in a projected plane and as seen in plan view so the effect of the convex curvature of the skin contacting surface of the blade unit has not been taken into account in determining the relevant dimensional data.
  • FIGS. 1 to 9 are schematic plan views of razor blade units embodying the invention. - 7 -
  • Figure 10 is a graph showing circularity plotted against aspect ratio (maximum length/maximum width) and showing the results for the blade units of Figures 1 to 9 and for some prior art blade units;
  • Figure 11 is a schematic cross-section through the blade unit of Figure 1;
  • Figure 12 illustrates a modified shape of guard and cap surfaces for the blade unit of Figure 1
  • Figure 13 illustrates in perspective a blade housing of a blade unit as shown in Figure 1;
  • Figure 14 illustrates in partial perspective view a blade unit as shown in Figure 1 and having guard and cap surfaces similar to those of the Figure 13 embodiment;
  • Figures 15 and 16 are views corresponding to Fig. 14 showing blade units with two and three forwardly facing blades, respectively.
  • Each of the blade units shown in Figures 1 to 9 will comprise a blade housing which incorporates a substantially inflexible blade carrier frame conveniently moulded from plastics material.
  • the housing defines a skin contact area surrounding an elongate rectangular aperture 2 in which a blade (not shown in Figs. 1-9) with a sharp rectilinear edge is mounted.
  • a single blade may be provided, but preferably two or more blades with parallel sharpened edges are mounted in the aperture 2.
  • Figure 15 shows an embodiment with two blades in tandem
  • Figure 16 shows another embodiment with three blades with parallel edges all facing in the forward direction.
  • Each of the blade units of Figures 1 to 9 may be regarded as being adapted to receive ' two blades, or three blades mounted similarly to the blades in
  • the blade housing in each of the embodiments shown in Figures 1 to 9 has a guard area 3, which is located forwardly (below as viewed in the drawings) of the blade aperture, and a cap area 4 behind (above in the drawings) of the blade aperture 2.
  • the particular blade unit of Figure 1 is oval and has the shape of a rectangle with semicircular ends.
  • the dimensions as measured in the projected plan view as illustrated are as follows:
  • the blade unit of Figure 2 is approximately rectangular with corners of large radii of curvature.
  • Figure 3 illustrates a blade unit of asymmetric configuration. At the ends of the front edge of the blade unit housing are rounded corners of large radius (as in -Fig. 2) , and the corners at the ends of the rear edge are rounded with a substantially greater radius of curvature.
  • Front end corner radius .0mm
  • Rear end radius 10.0mm
  • Guard area 185mm
  • FIGs 4-6 show blade units with housings of the same overall shape and size of that shown in Figure 1, but the position of the blade aperture is different.
  • the aperture is located so that the guard and cap areas are equal, whereas in Figure 5 it is positioned so that the cap area is substantially smaller than the guard area (but still at least 140mm ) and in Figure 6 it is positioned so that the guard area is substantially smaller than the cap area (but still at least 140mm 2 ) .
  • Figure 7 illustrates a polygononal blade unit shaped essentially as a rectangle with chamfered corners 7 with faces at 135° to the longitudinal front and rear sides and to the ends. In the case of a blade unit of overall length 42mm and overall width 18mm, the chamfers may lie along the diagonals of squares measuring 5mm x 5mm.
  • Figures 1-7 have rectilinear front and rear edge portions which, at least over a major part of the blade length are parallel to the blade edge(s). This can be desirable to ease orientation of the blade unit and assist the user in knowing in which direction the blade unit should be moved over the skin. It is not essential, however, and the dimensional criteria of a blade unit embodying the invention can be obtained with other configurations.
  • Figure 8 for example shows a blade unit of elliptical outline, and even a circular shape as shown in Figure 9 is possible although it is not the most desirable embodiment.
  • Figure 10 shows a graph showing circularity plotted against aspect ratio, i.e. the maximum length/maximum width of the blade unit.
  • the points representative of the blade units of Figures 1-9 are indicated (1) .... (9) , the points representative of three prior art female razor blade units currently marketed are indicated A, B and C, and the point representative of a square is indicated S for comparison purposes.
  • the line R w which extends generally diagonally across the graph is representative of rectangles with corner radii of 30% of the rectangle width.
  • the dotted line R L is representative of rectangles with corner radii of 10% of the rectangle length.
  • the horizontal line is drawn at a circularity of 65%. It can be seen that all the preferred embodiments of the invention denoted on the graph have aspect ratios between 1.5 and 2.8, and for the majority the aspect ratio is in the range of 2.0 to 2.5.
  • the embodiments of the invention have circularity greater than the circularity of a corresponding rectangle with the same aspect ratio and having corners rounded at a radius of 10% of the rectangle length (R L ) or of 30% of the rectangle width (R w ) .
  • the embodiments of the invention have greater circularity than the prior art blade units and those included on the graph all have values above 60%, and more especially above 70%. (It may be noted that there are two points (8) shown in Figure 10 to depict two alterative elliptical shapes) .
  • the skin contacting surfaces are not flat and the views of Figures 1 to 9 are merely the projected plan areas.
  • the surfaces are preferably shaped to make at least three point, and ideally at least four point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle with a radius of 25mm.
  • Figure 11 shows this preferred relationship for a blade which could, for example, be the blade unit of Figure 1.
  • the imaginary circle is drawn in dotted line, and it can be seen that the cap and guard surfaces are in substantial conformity with this circle.
  • the guard and cap surfaces are essentially flat, but they could be convexly curved to provide even closer conformity, e.g. as depicted in the schematic illustration of Figure 12.
  • the cap and guard surfaces are inclined to a plane P, which is the "shaving surface" tangential to the skin contact surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blade(s) , at an angle which is 15° in the exemplary embodiment illustrated.
  • the most appropriate inclination angle will depend on the blade unit width and will be chosen accordingly, but for most embodiments of the invention at least, an angle in the range of 10° to 20° will be required to ensure close conformity with the imaginary circle.
  • a convex guard and/or cap surface as in Figure 12, it will be appropriate to consider the inclination of a chord line intersecting the edges of the surface in question nearest and most remote from the adjacent blade.
  • Figure 13 there is illustrated a preferred form of blade unit housing.
  • FIG. 14 It has a frame 10 defining an aperture 2 to accommodate the blades and the components which fix them in the frame.
  • guard and cap components each having an elastomeric surface element 12 defining a skin contact area formed with an array of cylindrical pockets 13 evenly distributed over essentially the entire surface area.
  • the elastomeric element is moulded onto a support 14 which is firmly fastened in the frame 10.
  • Figures 14, 15 and 16 show a modified construction wherein the elastomeric elements 12 are carried directly by the frame of the blade unit. These figures also shows the blades 15 fitted within the frames, and one of the securing clips 16 which are provided at each end of the blade unit to retain the blades in place.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Forests & Forestry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Dry Shavers And Clippers (AREA)
  • Knives (AREA)
  • Cleaning In Electrography (AREA)
  • Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
  • Surgical Instruments (AREA)

Abstract

A razor blade unit for a safety razor has optimised shape and dimensions for body shaving, especially the regions of the axillae. The blade unit has an elongate blade with a rectilinear sharpened edge, and a skin contacting surface at which the length is 1 to 4 times the width and not greater than 60 mm, preferably 40 to 45 mm. The skin contacting surface has a footprint area of at least 450 mm2, preferably 600 to 750 mm2, and a circularity which is not less than the lower of (i) 65 %, and (ii) the circularity of a rectangle with the same length and width as the skin contacting surface and with corner radii of 30 % of the width. In a plane perpendicular to the blade edge the skin contacting surface is convex and shaped to make at least three point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle with a radius of 15 to 70 mm, preferably 25 mm. Guard and cap surfaces in front of and behind the blade edge each have a skin contact area of at least 140 mm2, and their combined areas is preferably at least 400 mm2, e.g. 450 to 500 mm2. A preferred shape is rectangular with semi-circular ends.

Description

OVAL FRAME RAZOR This invention relates to safety razors of the kind having a blade unit carried by a handle, the blade unit including an elongate blade with a rectilinear sharpened edge, or a plurality of such blades with parallel edges. The blade unit may be fixedly mounted on the handle with the intention that the entire razor be discarded when the blade edge or edges have become dulled. Alternatively, the blade unit can be detachably connected to the handle to enable replacement of a used blade unit with a fresh blade unit. Replaceable blade units are commonly referred to as cartridges.
There has been a general tendency over recent years for razor blade units to have been reduced in size, especially regarding the area of the surfaces which contact the skin around the blades during shaving, and the majority of blade units currently available in the marketplace are long and narrow with substantially rectangular configurations as viewed in a direction substantially perpendicular to the skin contacting surfaces. On the whole razor blade units of such shape and size have been found to provide an enhanced shaving performance in comparison with earlier blade units of larger dimensions.
The present invention is aimed specifically at a blade unit for body shaving, primarily in the axillary area. There are already on the market razors intended for use by ladies who do commonly shave their axillae, and like other razors there has been a strong trend towards making the blade units of these female razors with a narrow rectangular configuration as mentioned above. It has become the accepted thinking within the art that such blade units of narrow dimensions are especially beneficial for shaving the axillae since they will more readily fit into the rather deep concave socket of the axilla.
The present invention makes a significant departure from this current thinking in the shaving field and goes directly against all recent developments in this technical area as regards blade unit dimensions. Surprisingly, and contrary to all expectations, shaving tests have shown that not only can a blade unit of relatively large dimensions at least equal the shaving effectiveness of the smaller prior art blade units when shaving the axillae, but large blade units can be shaped to conform to the axilla region of the body so that shaving performance is not diminished, and that in terms of overall comfort large blade units have a superior performance to the prior art blade units and are preferred by users. It appears the added stability given by a large contact area with the skin gives the user greater confidence when shaving the axilla which cannot be viewed very easily during the shaving process, and as a consequence an improved comfort is perceived by the user and this more than counteracts any loss of performance due to the large contact area. For most adult females, the underarm cavity has a minimum radius of curvature of about 25 to 30mm. Therefore, a razor blade unit according to the invention has a length not greater than 60mm, preferably not greater than 50mm, and a length in the range of 40 to 45mm is preferred. The width of the blade unit is preferably such that the aspect ratio, namely the ratio of the overall length to the overall width measured perpendicular to the blade, is in the range of 1 to 4, and in most of the preferred embodiments of the invention the aspect ratio is from 1.5 to 2.8, and more precisely in the range of 2.0 to 2.5. In the preferred embodiments the width of the blade unit is in the range of 12 to 23mm, in particular 15 to 20mm. Guard and cap surfaces are defined in front of and behind the blade or blades for contact with the skin in front of and behind the blade or blades during shaving, and preferably each of the guard and cap surfaces has a width of not less than 4.0mm, at least where the width of the blade unit is at a maximum. The guard and cap each has a skin contact area which is preferably not less than 140mm , and the combined skin contact areas of the cap and guard are preferably at least 400mm , and most preferably in the
2 range of 450 to 500mm . As the blade un t of the present invention is rather wide, in order to facilitate contact with the skin in the axilla over at least most of the guard and cap areas, as viewed in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edges, the skin contacting surface is made convex. It is important to understand that the word "convex" as used in the present specification does not necessarily mean that the skin contacting surface is smoothly curved and it implies only that the guard and cap surfaces extend upwardly in the direction from their edges remote from the blade or blades so that the blade edge or edges are at a level above the remote edges of the cap and guard surfaces. More particularly, a straight line joining the outer and inner limits of each of the guard and cap surfaces is inclined at an angle of at least 5°, and possibly up to 25°, to a plane which is tangential to the skin contacting surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blades. In the preferred embodiments the angle of inclination is in the range of 10 to 20 degrees, and more specifically substantially equal to 15°. By virtue of the convexity of the skin contacting surface, the blade unit is preferably shaped to make at least three point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle having a diameter of from 30 to 100mm, and preferably of about 50mm whereby it will be ensured that the blade unit convexity will at least approximately conform to that of the axilla.
An important aspect of the blade unit according to the invention is that it defines a large area over which contact can be made with the skin during shaving, and a circumscribing perimeter extending about the skin contacting surface confines an area, referred to hereinafter as the "footprint area",
2 of at least 450mm . The most preferred footprint area is in the range of 600-750mm , and more specifically between 650 and 720mm2.
Since the invention proposes a blade unit with a long and wide shape, a substantially rectangular configuration with sharp angled corners, at least at the edge adjacent the guard surface, is inappropriate. For the purposes of the present specification a sharp angled corner may be considered to be an angle less than about 120° with a radius of curvature less than around 3mm. Preferably the curvature at any corner is at least 5mm. The unacceptability of a substantially rectangular configuration and the objective of providing a large skin contact area means that the blade unit needs to be profiled, as seen in plan generally perpendicular to the skin contacting area, to obtain a relatively large area within the confines of the overall length and width dimensions. The "circularity" of a two dimensional shape is a convenient way of relating the area enclosed by its perimeter to the length of the perimeter, and expressing it in terms of a percentage compared with a circle which always provides the maximum area for any given perimeter length. Thus, the circularity for any shape is defined by the equation:
Circulatory = A x 4ττ x 100 P2
where A = the area
P = the perimeter
Razor blade units according to the present invention have a circularity not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the skin contacting area and having corner radii of 30% of said width. Preferably the circularity is greater than that of a rectangle with the same overall length and width and rounded corners with radii equal to 10% of the length. For blade units with a low aspect ratio, i.e. less than about 3, the lower limit (a) will apply, although even in the case of these blade units it is preferable that the circularity also exceeds limit (b) . Acceptable oval blade units with an aspect ratio above 3.25 may have a circularity of less than 65%. Preferred embodiments with aspect ratios below about 2.75 have a circularity greater than 70%, and more particularly in the order of 80%. Typical prior art blade units have a circularity of less than 65%. The comparatively large circularity of a blade unit according to the invention can be achieved with rounded corners at the ends of the blade unit with relatively large radii of curvature of at least 6mm, or with oval, elliptical or polygonal shapes which need not necessarily be symmetrical.
Having regard to the foregoing, the present invention resides in a razor blade unit comprising at least one elongate blade having a rectilinear sharpened edge and mounted in a substantially inflexible carrier, a skin contacting surface surrounding the blade edge(s) and including guard and cap surfaces on opposite sides of the blade edge(s), the aspect ratio of the length to width of the skin contacting surface being in the range of from 1 to 4, as seen in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edge(s) the skin contacting surface being convex, the overall length of the blade unit at the skin contacting surface being not greater than 60mm, the skin contacting surface having a circumscribing perimeter confining a footprint area of at least 450mm , and the circumscribing perimeter being so shaped that the footprint area confined by said perimeter has a circularity (as herein above defined) not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the footprint area of the skin contacting surface and having corner radii of 30% of said width, and the edge of the blade unit adjacent the guard surface being free of sharp angled corners. A razor equipped with a blade unit as described above has been found in shave tests to achieve a significantly improved overall performance in shaving the axilla and has also been found to be very effective in shaving other body areas, such as the legs. It should be understood that unless otherwise stated, all dimensions and areas quoted herein are measured in a projected plane and as seen in plan view so the effect of the convex curvature of the skin contacting surface of the blade unit has not been taken into account in determining the relevant dimensional data.
To further illustrate the invention some forms of razor blade unit shaped and dimensioned in accordance with the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
Figures 1 to 9 are schematic plan views of razor blade units embodying the invention; - 7 -
Figure 10 is a graph showing circularity plotted against aspect ratio (maximum length/maximum width) and showing the results for the blade units of Figures 1 to 9 and for some prior art blade units; Figure 11 is a schematic cross-section through the blade unit of Figure 1;
Figure 12 illustrates a modified shape of guard and cap surfaces for the blade unit of Figure 1; Figure 13 illustrates in perspective a blade housing of a blade unit as shown in Figure 1;
Figure 14 illustrates in partial perspective view a blade unit as shown in Figure 1 and having guard and cap surfaces similar to those of the Figure 13 embodiment; and
Figures 15 and 16 are views corresponding to Fig. 14 showing blade units with two and three forwardly facing blades, respectively.
Each of the blade units shown in Figures 1 to 9 will comprise a blade housing which incorporates a substantially inflexible blade carrier frame conveniently moulded from plastics material. The housing defines a skin contact area surrounding an elongate rectangular aperture 2 in which a blade (not shown in Figs. 1-9) with a sharp rectilinear edge is mounted. A single blade may be provided, but preferably two or more blades with parallel sharpened edges are mounted in the aperture 2. In the particular embodiment shown in Fig. 14, there are three blades, two facing forwardly and one facing rearwardly so that the razor blade unit will shave in both directions although forward movement across the skin will generally provide a slightly better result. Figure 15 shows an embodiment with two blades in tandem, and Figure 16 shows another embodiment with three blades with parallel edges all facing in the forward direction. Each of the blade units of Figures 1 to 9 may be regarded as being adapted to receive 'two blades, or three blades mounted similarly to the blades in
Figure 14 or all in tandem. The blade housing in each of the embodiments shown in Figures 1 to 9 has a guard area 3, which is located forwardly (below as viewed in the drawings) of the blade aperture, and a cap area 4 behind (above in the drawings) of the blade aperture 2.
The particular blade unit of Figure 1 is oval and has the shape of a rectangle with semicircular ends. The dimensions as measured in the projected plan view as illustrated are as follows:
Overall length = 42.0mm
Overall width = 18.0mm
End radius = 9.0mm Guard area = 206mm
Cap area = 277mm
2 Total skin contact area = 504mm
Total footprint area
2 within perimeter = 686mm The blade unit of Figure 2 is approximately rectangular with corners of large radii of curvature.
The particular dimensions for this embodiment are:
Overall length = 41.0mm
Overall width = 18.0mm Corner radius = 6.0mm
2
Guard area = 213mm
Cap area = 286mm
2
Total skin contact area = 520mm
Total footprint area
2 within perimeter = 703mm
Figure 3 illustrates a blade unit of asymmetric configuration. At the ends of the front edge of the blade unit housing are rounded corners of large radius (as in -Fig. 2) , and the corners at the ends of the rear edge are rounded with a substantially greater radius of curvature. The specific dimensions are: Overall length = 40.0mm
Overall width = 18.0mm
Front end corner radius = .0mm Rear end radius = 10.0mm Guard area = 185mm
Cap area = 283mm2
Total skin contact area = 488mm Total footprint area within perimeter = 668mm Figures 4-6 show blade units with housings of the same overall shape and size of that shown in Figure 1, but the position of the blade aperture is different. In Figure 4 the aperture is located so that the guard and cap areas are equal, whereas in Figure 5 it is positioned so that the cap area is substantially smaller than the guard area (but still at least 140mm ) and in Figure 6 it is positioned so that the guard area is substantially smaller than the cap area (but still at least 140mm2) . Figure 7 illustrates a polygononal blade unit shaped essentially as a rectangle with chamfered corners 7 with faces at 135° to the longitudinal front and rear sides and to the ends. In the case of a blade unit of overall length 42mm and overall width 18mm, the chamfers may lie along the diagonals of squares measuring 5mm x 5mm.
All the embodiments of Figures 1-7 have rectilinear front and rear edge portions which, at least over a major part of the blade length are parallel to the blade edge(s). This can be desirable to ease orientation of the blade unit and assist the user in knowing in which direction the blade unit should be moved over the skin. It is not essential, however, and the dimensional criteria of a blade unit embodying the invention can be obtained with other configurations. Figure 8, for example shows a blade unit of elliptical outline, and even a circular shape as shown in Figure 9 is possible although it is not the most desirable embodiment.
Figure 10 shows a graph showing circularity plotted against aspect ratio, i.e. the maximum length/maximum width of the blade unit. The points representative of the blade units of Figures 1-9 are indicated (1) .... (9) , the points representative of three prior art female razor blade units currently marketed are indicated A, B and C, and the point representative of a square is indicated S for comparison purposes. The line Rw which extends generally diagonally across the graph is representative of rectangles with corner radii of 30% of the rectangle width. The dotted line RL is representative of rectangles with corner radii of 10% of the rectangle length. The horizontal line is drawn at a circularity of 65%. It can be seen that all the preferred embodiments of the invention denoted on the graph have aspect ratios between 1.5 and 2.8, and for the majority the aspect ratio is in the range of 2.0 to 2.5.
Furthermore, the embodiments of the invention have circularity greater than the circularity of a corresponding rectangle with the same aspect ratio and having corners rounded at a radius of 10% of the rectangle length (RL) or of 30% of the rectangle width (Rw) . In addition, the embodiments of the invention have greater circularity than the prior art blade units and those included on the graph all have values above 60%, and more especially above 70%. (It may be noted that there are two points (8) shown in Figure 10 to depict two alterative elliptical shapes) .
In all of the embodiments of the invention the skin contacting surfaces are not flat and the views of Figures 1 to 9 are merely the projected plan areas. The surfaces are preferably shaped to make at least three point, and ideally at least four point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle with a radius of 25mm. Figure 11 shows this preferred relationship for a blade which could, for example, be the blade unit of Figure 1. The imaginary circle is drawn in dotted line, and it can be seen that the cap and guard surfaces are in substantial conformity with this circle. In Figure 11 the guard and cap surfaces are essentially flat, but they could be convexly curved to provide even closer conformity, e.g. as depicted in the schematic illustration of Figure 12. The cap and guard surfaces are inclined to a plane P, which is the "shaving surface" tangential to the skin contact surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blade(s) , at an angle which is 15° in the exemplary embodiment illustrated. In any particular embodiment the most appropriate inclination angle will depend on the blade unit width and will be chosen accordingly, but for most embodiments of the invention at least, an angle in the range of 10° to 20° will be required to ensure close conformity with the imaginary circle. In the case of a convex guard and/or cap surface, as in Figure 12, it will be appropriate to consider the inclination of a chord line intersecting the edges of the surface in question nearest and most remote from the adjacent blade. In Figure 13 there is illustrated a preferred form of blade unit housing. It has a frame 10 defining an aperture 2 to accommodate the blades and the components which fix them in the frame. Mounted on the frame are guard and cap components each having an elastomeric surface element 12 defining a skin contact area formed with an array of cylindrical pockets 13 evenly distributed over essentially the entire surface area. For ease of manufacture and assembly the elastomeric element is moulded onto a support 14 which is firmly fastened in the frame 10. Figures 14, 15 and 16 show a modified construction wherein the elastomeric elements 12 are carried directly by the frame of the blade unit. These figures also shows the blades 15 fitted within the frames, and one of the securing clips 16 which are provided at each end of the blade unit to retain the blades in place. It is important to note that, as previously mentioned, all the dimensions quoted in the description and claims of this specification regarding length, width and area are based on the profile of the blade unit skin contacting surface projected onto a plane which is parallel to the plane of the shaving surface i.e. the plane denoted P in Figure 11. In addition, when calculating the circularity, any minor irregularities in the perimeter, e.g. due to small indentations, such as narrow notches or projections which can significantly change the perimeter without substantially changing the area, should be disregarded.

Claims

C L A I M S
1. A razor blade unit comprising at least one elongate blade having a rectilinear sharpened edge and mounted in a substantially inflexible carrier, a skin contacting surface surrounding the blade edge(s) and including guard and cap surfaces on opposite sides of the blade edge(s), the aspect ratio of the length to width of the skin contacting surface being in the range of from 1 to 4, as seen in cross section in a plane perpendicular to the blade edge(s) the skin contacting surface being convex, the overall length of the blade unit at the skin contacting surface being not greater than 60mm, the skin contacting surface having a circumscribing perimeter confining a footprint area of at least 450mm , and the circumscribing perimeter being so shaped that the footprint area confined by said perimeter has a circularity (as herein above defined) not less than the lower of (a) 65%, and (b) the circularity of a substantially rectangular area having the same length and width as the footprint area of the skin contacting surface and having corner radii of 30% of said width and the edge of the blade unit adjacent the guard surface being free of sharp angled corners.
2. A blade unit according to claim 1, wherein
2 the footprint area is in the range of 600 to 750mm .
3. A blade unit according to claim 2, wherein
2 the footprint area is between 650 and 720mm .
4. A blade unit according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the overall length of the blade unit at the skin contacting surface is not greater than 50mm preferably within the range of 40 to 45mm.
5. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein said aspect ratio of length to width is in the range of from 1.5 to 2.8.
6. A blade unit according to claim 5, wherein the aspect ratio is in the range of 2.0 to 2.5.
7. A blade unit according to any one of the pre- ceding claims, wherein each of the guard and" cap sur¬ faces has an area of at least 140mm2, and at a position where the width of the blade unit is greatest, each of the guard and cap surfaces has a width of at least 4.0mm.
8. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the maximum width of the blade unit is in the range of 12 to 23mm.
9. A blade unit according to claim 8, wherein the maximum width is in the range of 15 to 20mm.
10. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the aggregate area of the guard and cap surfaces is at least 400mm .
11. A blade unit according to claim 10, wherein the aggregate area of the guard and cap surfaces is in the range of 450 to 500mm2.
12. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 11, wherein each of the guard and cap surfaces is arranged so that a straight line passing through the edges thereof nearest and most remote from the blade(s) is inclined to a plane tangential to the skin contacting surfaces immediately in front of and behind the blade edge(β) at an angle of at least 5°.
13. A blade unit according to claim 12, wherein said angle of inclination for each of the guard and cap surfaces is in the range of 10° to 20°.
14. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein the skin contacting surface is shaped in cross-section to make at least three point contact with an imaginary circumscribing circle of radius 15 to 70mm, preferably 25mm.
15. A blade unit according to claim 14, wherein the skin contacting surface is shaped for close conformity with said imaginary circle over the guard and cap surfaces.
16. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 15, wherein the area confined by the circumscribing perimeter of the skin contacting surface has a circularity in the range of 70% to 85%.
17. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 16, wherein the area confined by the circumscribing perimeter of the skin contacting surface has a circular- ity greater than that of a substantially rectangular area with the same overall length and width as the skin contac¬ ting surface and with corner radii of 10% of the length.
18. A blade unit according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the aspect ratio is less than 3, and the circularity of the area confined by the circumscribing perimeter of skin contacting surface is greater than the circularity of a rectangle having the same overall length and width of the skin contacting surface and corner radii of 30% of the width.
19. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein at least one of the front and rear edges of the blade unit includes a rectilinear portion extending along a major part of the blade edge length and parallel thereto, and smoothly curved corner portions at either end of said rectilinear portion.
20. A blade unit according to claim 19, wherein said corner portions have a radius of curvature at least 6mm.
21. A blade unit according to claim 19 or 20, wherein the blade unit has semi-circular ends.
22. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 18, wherein the skin contacting surface has an elliptical profile.
23. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 22, wherein the guard and cap surfaces are formed by elastomeric elements.
24. A blade unit according to claim 23, wherein the elastomeric elements define surfaces with pockets distributed over said surfaces.
25. A blade unit according to any one of claims 1 to 24, wherein at least two blades with forwardly directed edges are mounted in the blade carrier.
EP96940415A 1995-11-10 1996-11-08 Oval frame razor Expired - Lifetime EP0868267B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9523040 1995-11-10
GBGB9523040.5A GB9523040D0 (en) 1995-11-10 1995-11-10 Safety razors
PCT/US1996/018192 WO1997017174A2 (en) 1995-11-10 1996-11-08 Oval frame razor

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0868267A2 true EP0868267A2 (en) 1998-10-07
EP0868267B1 EP0868267B1 (en) 1999-10-13

Family

ID=10783688

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP96940415A Expired - Lifetime EP0868267B1 (en) 1995-11-10 1996-11-08 Oval frame razor

Country Status (29)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0868267B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2000500044A (en)
KR (1) KR100433159B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1098755C (en)
AR (1) AR004308A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE185509T1 (en)
BR (1) BR9611360A (en)
CA (1) CA2236418C (en)
CO (1) CO4560422A1 (en)
CZ (1) CZ296574B6 (en)
DE (1) DE69604695T2 (en)
EG (1) EG21428A (en)
ES (1) ES2137024T3 (en)
GB (1) GB9523040D0 (en)
HU (1) HU222526B1 (en)
IL (1) IL124327A (en)
MX (1) MX9803632A (en)
NO (1) NO313659B1 (en)
NZ (1) NZ323219A (en)
PL (1) PL181865B1 (en)
RO (1) RO121100B1 (en)
RU (1) RU2164861C2 (en)
SK (1) SK284975B6 (en)
TR (1) TR199800836T2 (en)
TW (1) TW344698B (en)
UA (1) UA57718C2 (en)
WO (1) WO1997017174A2 (en)
YU (1) YU48941B (en)
ZA (1) ZA969329B (en)

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6161287A (en) 1998-04-24 2000-12-19 The Gillette Company Razor blade system
US6131287A (en) 1998-06-08 2000-10-17 American Safety Razor Company Razor cartridge with dimpled blade guard
US6754958B2 (en) 1998-08-19 2004-06-29 The Gillette Company Applying fluid preparations to the skin, e.g. in connection with shaving
GB9818115D0 (en) 1998-08-19 1998-10-14 Gillette Co Applying fluid preparation to the skin e g in connection with shaving
MXPA02000916A (en) * 1999-07-27 2003-07-14 Edward A Andrews Manual shaving razors with glides.
US6675479B1 (en) 2000-02-29 2004-01-13 The Gillette Company Shaving razor and blade unit with improved guard
US6651342B1 (en) 2000-02-29 2003-11-25 The Gillette Company Shaving razor and blade unit with improved guard
GB0515990D0 (en) * 2005-08-03 2005-09-07 Gillette Co Razors
US20110203113A1 (en) * 2010-02-25 2011-08-25 Xiandong Wang Razor Cartridge With Improved Cap Structure
PL2537649T3 (en) * 2011-06-21 2013-11-29 Gillette Co Razor cartridge with skin contact element
US20140000114A1 (en) * 2012-06-28 2014-01-02 The Gillette Company Shaving razor cartridge
AU2014226268A1 (en) * 2013-03-04 2015-09-17 The Gillette Company Llc Article for carrying a glide member for use with a razor
KR102067749B1 (en) * 2013-06-19 2020-01-17 빅-비올렉스 에스아 Shaving blade assembly
DE202013012669U1 (en) 2013-09-25 2018-05-24 Bic-Violex S.A. razor head
PL2853362T3 (en) 2013-09-25 2017-01-31 Bic Violex S.A. A shaving blade cartridge
EP3113918B1 (en) 2013-10-02 2020-01-08 Dorco Co., Ltd. Razor cartridges
BR112016012363B1 (en) 2013-12-05 2021-03-30 Bic-Violex Sa SHAVING BLADE CARTRIDGE, SHAVING BLADE ANGLE AND SHAVER
CA2932764C (en) 2013-12-18 2020-01-14 Bic-Violex Sa A shaving blade cartridge
EP3230021B1 (en) * 2014-12-10 2020-08-12 BIC-Violex S.A. Shaving blade assembly comprising a blade unit and a skin contact member and a razor comprising a razor handle and such a shaving blade assembly
PL3254814T3 (en) * 2015-02-04 2020-08-24 Xiangrong Ren Cutting head for shaver and assembly method therefor
USD877983S1 (en) 2016-09-09 2020-03-10 The Gillette Company Llc Shaving razor cartridge
EP3292965B1 (en) 2016-09-09 2021-05-26 The Gillette Company LLC Shaving razor cartridge and method of assembling
EP3292963B1 (en) * 2016-09-09 2020-04-01 The Gillette Company LLC Shaving razor cartridge
US11117278B2 (en) 2017-06-06 2021-09-14 The Gillette Company Llc Shaving razor cartridge
EP3453498A1 (en) * 2017-09-11 2019-03-13 The Gillette Company LLC Hair removal device for pubic hair
EP3453497A1 (en) * 2017-09-11 2019-03-13 The Gillette Company LLC Hair removal device for pubic hair
CN109262663A (en) * 2018-11-29 2019-01-25 中山佐客护理用品有限公司 Razor head and shaver
WO2024020817A1 (en) * 2022-07-27 2024-02-01 温州美葆科技技术有限公司 Shaver head

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE509715A (en) *
FR482302A (en) * 1915-08-02 1917-03-13 Peter Olof Ugarph Safety razor
DE319832C (en) * 1919-02-19 1920-04-28 Alfred August Hulanicki Safety razor with spatially curved cutting edges
FR806899A (en) * 1936-05-27 1936-12-28 Movable blade safety razor
US2183554A (en) * 1938-03-04 1939-12-19 James C Evans Safety razor
GB1157640A (en) * 1966-08-23 1969-07-09 Calmic Ltd Improvements in or relating to Safety Shaving Razors
FR1503887A (en) * 1966-10-18 1967-12-01 Safety razor and razor blade
US4314404A (en) * 1980-02-20 1982-02-09 Ruiz Rene A Razor with pre-wetting or capillarizer system
GB2200587B (en) * 1987-02-04 1990-08-08 James Denmark Improvements relating to shaving devices
DE8717729U1 (en) * 1987-10-03 1989-10-19 Blume, Wilhelm, 5000 Köln Razor cutting head
DE9004761U1 (en) * 1990-04-27 1991-08-29 Wilkinson Sword GmbH, 5650 Solingen Shaver head, in particular razor blade unit, of a wet shaver

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9717174A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AR004308A1 (en) 1998-11-04
NO982007L (en) 1998-07-08
KR100433159B1 (en) 2004-09-08
RU2164861C2 (en) 2001-04-10
CO4560422A1 (en) 1998-02-10
TW344698B (en) 1998-11-11
DE69604695T2 (en) 2000-04-06
ZA969329B (en) 1997-05-21
IL124327A0 (en) 1998-12-06
SK60898A3 (en) 1998-12-02
UA57718C2 (en) 2003-07-15
AU701644B2 (en) 1999-02-04
PL326677A1 (en) 1998-10-12
IL124327A (en) 2001-09-13
KR19990067406A (en) 1999-08-16
HUP9902663A3 (en) 2000-07-28
CZ296574B6 (en) 2006-04-12
EP0868267B1 (en) 1999-10-13
JP2000500044A (en) 2000-01-11
ATE185509T1 (en) 1999-10-15
NZ323219A (en) 1999-09-29
CA2236418C (en) 2001-07-03
CZ141798A3 (en) 1999-02-17
TR199800836T2 (en) 1998-07-21
NO313659B1 (en) 2002-11-11
YU48941B (en) 2002-12-10
RO121100B1 (en) 2006-12-29
AU7730196A (en) 1997-05-29
NO982007D0 (en) 1998-05-04
CN1098755C (en) 2003-01-15
PL181865B1 (en) 2001-09-28
WO1997017174A3 (en) 1997-06-26
EG21428A (en) 2001-10-31
MX9803632A (en) 1998-09-30
GB9523040D0 (en) 1996-01-10
YU59696A (en) 1999-09-27
ES2137024T3 (en) 1999-12-01
HUP9902663A2 (en) 1999-12-28
HU222526B1 (en) 2003-08-28
BR9611360A (en) 1999-07-13
SK284975B6 (en) 2006-03-02
WO1997017174A2 (en) 1997-05-15
CA2236418A1 (en) 1997-05-15
CN1202127A (en) 1998-12-16
DE69604695D1 (en) 1999-11-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0868267B1 (en) Oval frame razor
US7178243B2 (en) Oval frame razor
WO1997017174A9 (en) Oval frame razor
EP0638014B1 (en) Safety razor
JP3814145B2 (en) Razor with convex blade assembly
US6298557B1 (en) Safety razors
JP5244590B2 (en) Shaving aid body for safety razor
US20080022529A1 (en) Shaving razor with trimming blade
PL168632B1 (en) Shaving system
PL182475B1 (en) Shaving blade assembly
CA2247821C (en) Safety razors
AU701644C (en) Oval frame razor
AU6485280A (en) Shaving assembly
JPH05123460A (en) Linear type safety razor
JP2001113066A (en) Spare blade with round rugged single edge

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19980608

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI LU NL PT SE

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990114

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB IT LI LU NL PT SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 185509

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19991015

Kind code of ref document: T

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: A. BRAUN, BRAUN, HERITIER, ESCHMANN AG PATENTANWAE

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69604695

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19991118

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2137024

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19991213

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20000110

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: THE GILLETTE COMPANY

Free format text: THE GILLETTE COMPANY#PRUDENTIAL TOWER BUILDING#BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02199 (US) -TRANSFER TO- THE GILLETTE COMPANY#PRUDENTIAL TOWER BUILDING#BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02199 (US)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20081021

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20091008

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20091026

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20091007

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20091007

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20101122

Year of fee payment: 15

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20091108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20110509

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101130

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110509

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101130

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20111107

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20111110

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20111103

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20111116

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20111207

Year of fee payment: 16

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: THE *GILLETTE CY

Effective date: 20121130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20130601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121109

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130601

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20140305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121109

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151130

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20151027

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69604695

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20161107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20161107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20170622 AND 20170628