[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

EP0199552B1 - Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric - Google Patents

Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0199552B1
EP0199552B1 EP86302889A EP86302889A EP0199552B1 EP 0199552 B1 EP0199552 B1 EP 0199552B1 EP 86302889 A EP86302889 A EP 86302889A EP 86302889 A EP86302889 A EP 86302889A EP 0199552 B1 EP0199552 B1 EP 0199552B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fabric
wale
yarn
property
average
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP86302889A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0199552A2 (en
EP0199552A3 (en
Inventor
Harvey Louis Kliman
Royden Harold Pike
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EIDP Inc
Original Assignee
EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co filed Critical EI Du Pont de Nemours and Co
Publication of EP0199552A2 publication Critical patent/EP0199552A2/en
Publication of EP0199552A3 publication Critical patent/EP0199552A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0199552B1 publication Critical patent/EP0199552B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B37/00Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines
    • D04B37/06Auxiliary apparatus or devices for use with knitting machines with warp knitting machines
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04BKNITTING
    • D04B21/00Warp knitting processes for the production of fabrics or articles not dependent on the use of particular machines; Fabrics or articles defined by such processes
    • D04B21/02Pile fabrics or articles having similar surface features
    • D04B21/04Pile fabrics or articles having similar surface features characterised by thread material

Definitions

  • This invention relates to simulating the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric based on properties of the yarn in the fabric.
  • the simulation is comparable to the actual fabric knit from yarn of those properties.
  • the present invention provides a method for simulating actual fabric appearance by just knowing the constituent yarn properties without having to make the actual fabric.
  • the method comprises the steps of obtaining a data set of yarn physical properties for each yarn in the warp knit fabric then programming a digital computer to average the yarn physical properties for each yarn in the fabric according to the stitch pattern of the fabric to produce a wale average property for each wale in the fabric.
  • the pixel density for the graphics display equipment associated with the computer is then calculated from the average wale properties and displayed to represent each wale in the fabric.
  • a warp-knit textile fabric as intended herein is best defined in terms of a stitch pattern as shown in Fig. 1. While many other patterns constituting warp-knitting are possible the one shown represents a jersey tricot warp knit construction. Knitting needle positions for each of five successive wales and courses for the front and back bars are represented in Fig. 1. The horizontal rows of dots represent courses 1-5 while the wales of the fabric are represented by vertical rows of dots A-G. More particularly, referring to Fig. 1 the stitch construction of the fabric is notationally set out and shows that the threads of the front bar indicated as 21-25 have back and forth movement to non-adjacent needles in successive courses and the threads of the back bar, indicated as 31-35 have similar movements.
  • the technology uses a Hewlett Packard HP9845 model 270 to print patterns which model the appearance of jersey warp knit fabrics.
  • the present invention provides a computer-aided method of predicting fabric appearance from physical or chemical properties of yarns used to knit a warp knit fabric and displaying such appearance, such fabric having a stitch pattern with courses and wales and each of said yarn properties having a contrast factor, said method comprising the steps of:
  • AD is the arbitrarily selected average print density desired for the simulation
  • Direct printing of simulations requires high resolution graphics and printing capability.
  • the Hewlett Packard HP9845 desktop computer meets both requirements with individual pixel control of graphics on the CRT and printer.
  • Resolution of the HP9845 printer is 77 pixels/inch in both X and Y directions.
  • Initial experiments with various patterns showed that printing alternate rows provided sufficient resolution (38.5 rows/inch vs. 50 wales/inch in the fabric) to represent each wale in a jersey warp knit fabric. Printing alternate rows gives the printouts a subtle linearity resembling the directionality of wales in a warp knit fabric.
  • the first step in the method is obtaining a data set consisting of a yarn property such as denier, modification ratio, yarn shrinkage, or dyeability for each yarn in the fabric.
  • the properties are then averaged according to the stitch pattern in the fabric to produce a wale average property for each wale in the fabric.
  • the simulation program then produces a printout in which the print density (fraction of pixels printed) in each row is given by the equation: Wherein
  • K the contrast factor
  • each yarn end for example, 21-25 in Fig. 1, in the fabric is essential for calculating wale average property (v).
  • v wale average property
  • front bar yarns are of more importance than back bar yarns in fabric uniformity because the back bar yarns in warp knit constructions are "sandwiched" in the fabric interior.
  • denier is the property being simulated, it has been found that front bar yarns make a 75% contribution to uniformity and back bar yarns a 25% contribution.
  • front bar yarns make essentially a 100% contribution to uniformity.
  • the weighted wale average property (in this case, denier) for wale C becomes:
  • wale average deniers are calculated according to equation 2 for each wale in the fabric and the pixel density is calculated according to equation 1.
  • the pixel density is displayed in a series of rows to represent each wale in the fabric as shown in Fig. 2 wherein the simulation of the fabric displaying streaks at locations 40 and 41 closely resembles a fabric knit of the actual yarns whose properties were used for the simulation.
  • the simulation was prepared on a Hewlett Packard HP9845 having a thermal printer programmed according to the flow charts shown in Fig. 4.
  • FIG. 3 An enlarged portion of Fig. 2 is shown in Fig. 3 wherein alternate rows are printed to give subtle linearity and one pixel is represented by a square as designated at 50.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Coloring (AREA)
  • Knitting Of Fabric (AREA)
  • Knitting Machines (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)

Description

    Background of the invention
  • This invention relates to simulating the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric based on properties of the yarn in the fabric. The simulation is comparable to the actual fabric knit from yarn of those properties.
  • Both yarn manufacturers and fabric producers are faced with the problem of variations in yarn properties (e.g. denier, shrinkage, cross section, dyeability) and the effect of these variations on fabrics. In the past the effects of these variations in the actual fabric could only be determined by actually making test fabrics from the yarns which is expensive and time consuming.
  • Summary of the invention
  • The present invention provides a method for simulating actual fabric appearance by just knowing the constituent yarn properties without having to make the actual fabric. The method comprises the steps of obtaining a data set of yarn physical properties for each yarn in the warp knit fabric then programming a digital computer to average the yarn physical properties for each yarn in the fabric according to the stitch pattern of the fabric to produce a wale average property for each wale in the fabric. The pixel density for the graphics display equipment associated with the computer is then calculated from the average wale properties and displayed to represent each wale in the fabric.
  • Brief description of the drawings
    • Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of the front and back bar of a warp knit fabric of the type simulated by this invention.
    • Fig. 2 is a drawing of a graphics display of a warp knit fabric simulated according to the invention.
    • Fig. 3 is an enlarged representation of a portion of a warp knit fabric simulated according to the invention.
    • Figs. 4-6 represent flow charts of a program to operate a computer for simulating a warp knit fabric according to the invention.
    Detailed description of the preferred embodiment
  • A warp-knit textile fabric as intended herein is best defined in terms of a stitch pattern as shown in Fig. 1. While many other patterns constituting warp-knitting are possible the one shown represents a jersey tricot warp knit construction. Knitting needle positions for each of five successive wales and courses for the front and back bars are represented in Fig. 1. The horizontal rows of dots represent courses 1-5 while the wales of the fabric are represented by vertical rows of dots A-G. More particularly, referring to Fig. 1 the stitch construction of the fabric is notationally set out and shows that the threads of the front bar indicated as 21-25 have back and forth movement to non-adjacent needles in successive courses and the threads of the back bar, indicated as 31-35 have similar movements.
  • As indicated above this technology is a tool to investigate the effects of yarn properties on the visual appearance of fabrics. The technology uses a Hewlett Packard HP9845 model 270 to print patterns which model the appearance of jersey warp knit fabrics.
  • More particularly, the present invention provides a computer-aided method of predicting fabric appearance from physical or chemical properties of yarns used to knit a warp knit fabric and displaying such appearance, such fabric having a stitch pattern with courses and wales and each of said yarn properties having a contrast factor, said method comprising the steps of:
    • obtaining a data set of at least one yarn physical or chemical property and its associated contrast factor for each yarn in the fabric;
    • providing the computer with a data base which includes said selected yarn property and its contrast factor;
    • averaging said yarn property according to said stitch pattern to produce a wale average property for each wale in said fabric;
      calculating print density by means of said computer from said wale average properties and said contrast factor using equation
      Figure imgb0001
      wherein
  • AD is the arbitrarily selected average print density desired for the simulation
    • K is the contrast factor and
    • Z=v-V/V where v is the computed wale average property value for the wale being printed and V is the arithmetic mean of all the values and is calculated as follows:
      Figure imgb0002
      wherein
    • v is the data expressed as individual values and
    • N is the total number of values; and
    • displaying print density as a random dot row element to represent each wale in said warp knit fabric, wherein the number of pixels in each random dot row is proportional to said wale average property for each in said fabric, whereby a predicted simulation of the fabric appearance made from said yarns is obtained by knowing the constituent properties of the yarns.
  • Direct printing of simulations requires high resolution graphics and printing capability. The Hewlett Packard HP9845 desktop computer meets both requirements with individual pixel control of graphics on the CRT and printer. Resolution of the HP9845 printer is 77 pixels/inch in both X and Y directions. Initial experiments with various patterns showed that printing alternate rows provided sufficient resolution (38.5 rows/inch vs. 50 wales/inch in the fabric) to represent each wale in a jersey warp knit fabric. Printing alternate rows gives the printouts a subtle linearity resembling the directionality of wales in a warp knit fabric.
  • The first step in the method is obtaining a data set consisting of a yarn property such as denier, modification ratio, yarn shrinkage, or dyeability for each yarn in the fabric. The properties are then averaged according to the stitch pattern in the fabric to produce a wale average property for each wale in the fabric. The simulation program then produces a printout in which the print density (fraction of pixels printed) in each row is given by the equation:
    Figure imgb0003
    Wherein
    • AD is the arbitrarily selected average print density desired for the simulation (usually .5)
    • K is the contrast factor and
    • Z=v-VN where v is the computed wale average property value for the wale being printed and V is the arithmetic mean of all the values and is calculated as follows:
      Figure imgb0004
      wherein
    • v is the data expressed as individual values and
    • N is the total number of values.
  • Determining K (the contrast factor) for a given property requires comparison of a banded implant fabric with simulations printed at a series of K's. The K that results in the best visual match is the correct one to use.
  • Computer wale average property (v)
  • The precise location of each yarn end; for example, 21-25 in Fig. 1, in the fabric is essential for calculating wale average property (v). Experience has shown that front bar yarns are of more importance than back bar yarns in fabric uniformity because the back bar yarns in warp knit constructions are "sandwiched" in the fabric interior. When denier is the property being simulated, it has been found that front bar yarns make a 75% contribution to uniformity and back bar yarns a 25% contribution. For other properties being simulated it has been foud that front bar yarns make essentially a 100% contribution to uniformity.
  • Referring to Fig. 1 and considering wale C in both the front and back bar it can be seen that yarn 23 appears in three odd numbered courses, e.g. 1, 3 and 5, and yarn No. 21 appears in the even numbered courses in the front bar and for the same wale in the back bar yarn 32 appears in the odd courses while yarn 33 appears in the even courses.
  • The weighted wale average property (in this case, denier) for wale C becomes:
    Figure imgb0005
    where
    • v is the individual property value of the yarn.
    Description of flow charts
  • The numbers preceding each paragraph refer to the flow charts shown in Fig. 4―6.
    • Step 100-Running the startup program initializes the computer memory for the following steps.
    • Step 200-Provision is made for entering yarn property data from the keyboard or loading data previously stored on flexible disc data files. More than 1 column of data may be entered.
    • Step 300-A retrieval program is run to load the previously stored pixel rows into the computer memory. Pixel densities from 5% to 95% of the pixels in a graphics display row are included in the data set in steps of 1 %. There are 5 rows of pseudorandomly arranged pixels at each density.
    • Step 400-Yarn property data are averaged according to the description on page 4 to provide wale average property data. The transform program allows keeping both the original yarn data and the wale average data in separate columns in a data matrix.
    • Step 500-The simulation program is loaded into memory and run.
    • Step 501-The operator selects the desired data to simulate (more than 1 set of data can be held in memory).
    • Step 502-The computer calculates the average property in the selected data for further calculations (equation on page 3, and Fig. 5).
    • Step 503-The operator selects the average print density desired for the simulation. Usually 0.5 is the starting level, and subsequent simulations may be run at higher or lower levels to produce darker or lighter simulations. This step does not affect the printout, unless extreme values are chosen (i.e., near the ends of the allowable scale of 0.05 to 0.95 print density). Refer to "AD" in equation (1), page 3.
    • Step 504-The computer calculates the print density for the first wale using equation (1), page 3.
    • Step 505-The pixel row data are selected corresponding to the calculated print density.
    • Step 506―The pixel row is re-randomized. This step is done to extraneous pattern formation in the case that the same pixel density is selected more than 5 times (the number of previously generated pixel rows at each density held in memory) in succession.
    • Step 507-The pixel row is displayed on the graphics screen of the computer.
    • Step 508-The pixel row displayed on the screen is transferred to the hard copy printer along with a blank pixel row.
    • Step 509-The computer checks for additional yarn data, and if available, continues the process from step 504. The program terminates when all the selected data have been printed and the operator signifies that no more simulations are to be run.
    Example
  • In an example using nominal 40 denier yarn in the jersey tricot warp knit construction represented in Fig. 1 wale average deniers are calculated according to equation 2 for each wale in the fabric and the pixel density is calculated according to equation 1. The pixel density is displayed in a series of rows to represent each wale in the fabric as shown in Fig. 2 wherein the simulation of the fabric displaying streaks at locations 40 and 41 closely resembles a fabric knit of the actual yarns whose properties were used for the simulation. The simulation was prepared on a Hewlett Packard HP9845 having a thermal printer programmed according to the flow charts shown in Fig. 4.
  • An enlarged portion of Fig. 2 is shown in Fig. 3 wherein alternate rows are printed to give subtle linearity and one pixel is represented by a square as designated at 50.

Claims (1)

  1. A computer-aided method of predicting fabric appearance from physical or chemical properties of yarns used to knit a warp knit fabric and displaying such appearance, such fabric having a stitch pattern with courses and wales and each of said yarn properties having a contrast factor, said method comprising the steps of:
    obtaining a data set of at least one yarn physical or chemical property and its associated contrast factor for each yarn in the fabric;
    providing the computer with a data base which includes said selected yarn property and its contrast factor;
    averaging said yarn property according to said stitch pattern to produce a wale average property for each wale in said fabric;
    calculating print density by means of said computer from said wale average properties and said contrast factor using equation
    Figure imgb0006
    wnerein
    AD is the arbitrarily selected average print density desired for the simulation
    K is the contrast factor and
    Z =v=V/V where v is the computed wale average property value for the wale being printed and V is the arithmetic mean of all the values and is calculated as follows:
    Figure imgb0007
    wherein
    v is the data expressed as individual values and
    N is the total number of values; and
    displaying print density as a random dot row element to represent each wale in said warp knit fabric, wherein the number of pixels in each random dot row is proportional to said wale average property for each in said fabric, whereby a predicted simulation of the fabric appearance made from said yarns is obtained by knowing the constituent properties of the yarns.
EP86302889A 1985-04-18 1986-04-17 Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric Expired - Lifetime EP0199552B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US72459985A 1985-04-18 1985-04-18
US724599 1985-04-18

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0199552A2 EP0199552A2 (en) 1986-10-29
EP0199552A3 EP0199552A3 (en) 1987-11-04
EP0199552B1 true EP0199552B1 (en) 1990-07-18

Family

ID=24911069

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86302889A Expired - Lifetime EP0199552B1 (en) 1985-04-18 1986-04-17 Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0199552B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS626969A (en)
KR (1) KR860008319A (en)
BR (1) BR8601696A (en)
CA (1) CA1258530A (en)
DE (1) DE3672660D1 (en)
DK (1) DK176186A (en)

Families Citing this family (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5299133A (en) * 1990-05-22 1994-03-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method for determining and controlling fiber luster properties
CH684129A5 (en) * 1992-06-18 1994-07-15 Zellweger Uster Ag Method and device for assessing the effect of yarn defects on woven or knitted fabric.
US5671061A (en) * 1992-06-18 1997-09-23 Zellweger Luwa Ag Method and apparatus for assessing the effect of yarn faults on woven or knitted fabrics
US5557527A (en) * 1993-08-31 1996-09-17 Shima Seiki Manufacturing Ltd. Knit design system and a method for designing knit fabrics
US6130746A (en) * 1994-03-10 2000-10-10 Lawson-Hemphill, Inc. System and method for electronically evaluating predicted fabric qualities
JP4113982B2 (en) * 1996-06-12 2008-07-09 ウステル・テヒノロジーズ・アクチエンゲゼルシフト Method for evaluating the effect of yarn defects in the fiber texture.
CN1211319A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-03-17 Cis图像处理有限责任公司 Yarn and fabric simulation system
DE19718562A1 (en) * 1997-05-02 1998-11-05 Zweigle Dieter Device for optimizing fabrics based on measured yarn data and optimization methods
DE19822321A1 (en) * 1998-05-19 1999-11-25 Stoll & Co H Process for producing a knitted piece on a knitting machine
JP4366321B2 (en) * 2005-02-18 2009-11-18 株式会社島精機製作所 Knitting product design apparatus and design method, and program thereof
WO2008107440A1 (en) * 2007-03-08 2008-09-12 Oerlikon Textile Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for simulating an image of a fiber product made of a multi-color thread and device for performing the method and method for producing a bcf thread

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1421911A (en) * 1972-06-02 1976-01-21 Wildt Mellor Bromley Ltd Preparation of patterns for knitting machines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPS626969A (en) 1987-01-13
DK176186A (en) 1986-10-19
BR8601696A (en) 1986-12-16
EP0199552A2 (en) 1986-10-29
EP0199552A3 (en) 1987-11-04
DE3672660D1 (en) 1990-08-23
CA1258530A (en) 1989-08-15
KR860008319A (en) 1986-11-14
DK176186D0 (en) 1986-04-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0199552B1 (en) Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a warp knit fabric
CN1867723B (en) Embroidery data creation device, embroidery data creation method
EP1020554B2 (en) Device for designing knitwear made on a knitting machine
US4984181A (en) Method of simulating by computer the appearance properties of a fabric
US6880367B2 (en) Knit design method and device
EP1900862B1 (en) Knit simulation device, knit simulation method, and program therefor
JPH0321661B2 (en)
DE69633849T2 (en) SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING IMAGES
DE2724075A1 (en) SYSTEM FOR THE OPTICAL REPRODUCTION OF SYMBOLS, CHARACTERS AND REPRESENTATIONS, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE LAYOUT OF ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS ETC.
US6895787B2 (en) Knit design method and apparatus
DE163863T1 (en) VIDEO DISPLAY CONTROL UNIT TO DISPLAY MOVABLE PATTERNS.
EP1652983A1 (en) Method and device for knit design and program
DE2724199A1 (en) SYSTEM FOR THE OPTICAL REPRODUCTION OF SYMBOLS, CHARACTERS AND REPRESENTATIONS, IN PARTICULAR FOR THE LAYOUT OF ADVERTISEMENTS IN NEWSPAPERS ETC.
WO2004079073A1 (en) A process for producing a knitted fabric
CN110799685B (en) Method for knitting a fabric using a knitting machine and knitting machine
EP0768415A1 (en) Method of displaying knit fabric and stitched structure
EP0161298B1 (en) Method of producing a pattern-bearing article
EP1614787B1 (en) Method and device for knit design
JPH021680B2 (en)
US5729555A (en) Method and apparatus for testing output device
JP2004326483A (en) Simulation image generation method of textile product
Pascual et al. An interactive package for the computer-aided design of woven fabrics
JP3034381B2 (en) Filling table making device
JP2511518B2 (en) Image display device
DE3448474C2 (en) Flat-bed knitter patterning device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880411

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19880914

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT NL

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3672660

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19900823

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19910212

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19910408

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19910424

Year of fee payment: 6

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19910430

Year of fee payment: 6

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19920417

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19921101

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19921230

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19930101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050417