[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

CN111740880A - Server operation method, operation system and related device - Google Patents

Server operation method, operation system and related device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111740880A
CN111740880A CN202010537375.7A CN202010537375A CN111740880A CN 111740880 A CN111740880 A CN 111740880A CN 202010537375 A CN202010537375 A CN 202010537375A CN 111740880 A CN111740880 A CN 111740880A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
server
concurrency
preset
script
limit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202010537375.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
贾猛
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co Ltd filed Critical Inspur Electronic Information Industry Co Ltd
Priority to CN202010537375.7A priority Critical patent/CN111740880A/en
Publication of CN111740880A publication Critical patent/CN111740880A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0876Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
    • H04L43/0888Throughput
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/04Processing captured monitoring data, e.g. for logfile generation
    • H04L43/045Processing captured monitoring data, e.g. for logfile generation for graphical visualisation of monitoring data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
    • H04L43/0876Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
    • H04L43/12Network monitoring probes

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)

Abstract

The application provides an operation method of a server, which comprises the following steps: acquiring a preset pressure measurement script; under the condition that a preset test condition is met, carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server; controlling the server to operate at the limit concurrency value or less. The method and the device can avoid the problems of damaged service life, low processing efficiency, low performance conversion rate and the like caused by operation of the server under ultrahigh concurrency number when the limit concurrency value of the server is not clear, so that the service persistence device is ensured to be in operation with high efficiency and high stability, and the service life of the server is prolonged. The application also provides an operating system of the server, a computer readable storage medium and the server, and the beneficial effects are also achieved.

Description

Server operation method, operation system and related device
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of servers, and in particular, to an operating method, an operating system, and a related apparatus for a server.
Background
The current popular method for finding the optimal concurrency value is to follow the principle of 2-5-8. Briefly described as follows: when the user can get a response within 2 seconds, the system will feel the response fast; when the user gets a response in 2-5 seconds, the response speed of the system can be felt; when the user gets a response within 5-8 seconds, the response speed of the system is perceived to be slow, but is acceptable; and when the user still fails to respond after more than 8 seconds, the system is perceived to be bad, or the system is considered to have lost response, and chooses to leave the Web site, or initiate a second request.
The method for finding the limit concurrency value of the server by using the principle of 2-5-8 is to perform performance pressure measurement from the minimum concurrency until the response time is close to 2-5-8 seconds, and find the concurrency value at the moment, namely the limit concurrency value.
However, with the development of server hardware facilities, the concurrency value determined according to the principle of 2-5-8 is not accurate, and cannot meet the current server requirements, so how to determine the optimal concurrency value of the server is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently by those skilled in the art.
Disclosure of Invention
The application aims to provide an operation method, an operation system, a computer readable storage medium and a server of the server, which can enable the server to operate with better concurrency and improve the data processing efficiency of the server.
In order to solve the technical problem, the application provides an operation method of a server, and the specific technical scheme is as follows:
acquiring a preset pressure measurement script;
under the condition that a preset test condition is met, carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
controlling the server to operate at the limit concurrency value or less.
Optionally, the preset test condition includes that there is no exception in the pressure test process, that the throughput rate of the server and the concurrency number of the preset pressure test script are in a linear relationship, and that the hardware device of the server does not reach a performance bottleneck.
Optionally, the step of performing a pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server includes:
continuously increasing the concurrency number of the preset pressure measurement script by a preset increasing unit, and obtaining a two-dimensional table graph of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server along with the change of the concurrency number;
and confirming the limit concurrency value according to the two-dimensional table graph.
Optionally, the method includes:
and recording the preset pressure measurement script by using a meter or loadrunner.
The application also provides an operation system of the server, and the specific technical scheme is as follows:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring a preset pressure measurement script;
the concurrency number determining module is used for carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script under the condition that a preset test condition is met, and obtaining a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
and the operation module is used for controlling the server to operate under the condition that the concurrency value is not higher than the limit.
Optionally, the concurrency number determining module includes:
the testing unit is used for continuously increasing the concurrency number of the preset pressure testing script by a preset increasing unit and obtaining a two-dimensional table graph of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server along with the change of the concurrency number;
and the concurrency number determining unit is used for determining the limit concurrency value according to the two-dimensional table diagram.
Optionally, the method includes:
and the script recording module is used for recording the preset pressure measurement script by using a meter or loadrunner.
The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method as set forth above.
The present application further provides a server comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory stores a computer program, and the processor implements the steps of the method described above when calling the computer program in the memory.
The application provides an operation method of a server, which comprises the following steps: acquiring a preset pressure measurement script; under the condition that a preset test condition is met, carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server; controlling the server to operate at the limit concurrency value or less.
The server is subjected to pressure testing by the aid of the preset pressure testing script, so that a limit concurrency value of the server under a current resource environment is obtained, the server can run at high efficiency under the condition that the limit concurrency value is not higher than the limit concurrency value, and the problems that the service life of the server is damaged due to running under ultrahigh concurrency value when the limit concurrency value of the server is not determined, the processing efficiency is low, the performance conversion rate is low and the like are solved, so that the service persistence device is ensured to run at high efficiency and high stability, and the service life of the server is prolonged. The application also provides an operating system of the server, a computer readable storage medium and the server, which also have the above beneficial effects and are not described herein again.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only embodiments of the present application, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the provided drawings without creative efforts.
Fig. 1 is a flowchart of an operating method of a server according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a graph of throughput rate versus concurrency provided by an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating resource utilization and concurrency according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an operating system of a server according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of an operation method of a server according to an embodiment of the present application, where the method includes:
s101: acquiring a preset pressure measurement script;
the step aims to obtain a preset pressure measurement script, and the preset pressure measurement script carries out concurrent pressure test on the server. The preset pressure measurement script is not specifically limited, and the preset pressure measurement script may be recorded in advance by using a meter or loadrunner. It should be noted that both the meter and loadrunner are pressure testing tools. Either the jmeter or the loadrunner monitors and collects the instructions discovered by the concurrent client through the intermediate agent, generates scripts according to the instructions, sends the scripts to the application server, and monitors the result fed back by the server. The specific parameters of the preset pressure test script are not limited, that is, the thread group, the resource occupation amount and the like of the preset pressure test script can be set correspondingly by a person skilled in the art according to the actual test requirement and the performance of the server to be tested.
S102: under the condition that a preset test condition is met, carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
it should be noted that, when the server is tested by using the preset pressure test script, the preset test condition needs to be satisfied. It is easy to understand that, in order to obtain the limit concurrency value corresponding to the server, it is at least required to ensure that when the server continuously increases the concurrency number of the preset pressure measurement script, the hardware of the server is not abnormal or damaged, that is, the server is still in a normal working state. Of course, other preset test conditions can be set by those skilled in the art, and are not limited herein.
As a preferred embodiment, the preset test conditions may include three conditions, that is, no exception occurs in the pressure test process, the throughput rate of the server and the concurrency number of the preset pressure test script are in a linear relationship, and the hardware device of the server does not reach the performance bottleneck. When the stress test is carried out, the change situation of the throughput rate and the hardware resource state of the server along with the increase of the concurrency number can be detected. It is easy to understand that if the throughput rate of the server is in a state of increasing first and then saturating along with the increase of the concurrency number, that is, in the initial stage, when the hardware resource of the server meets the continuously increasing concurrency number, the throughput rate of the server is linearly increased along with the increase of the concurrency number of the preset voltage measurement script, that is, every time one more preset voltage measurement script runs, the throughput rate of the server is correspondingly increased by one preset voltage measurement script. However, with the gradual increase of the concurrency number, the hardware resources of the server will gradually fail to meet the high concurrency number, and at this time, the throughput of the server will still increase, but the throughput of the server does not increase linearly with the concurrency number until the server is in a saturated state, and the throughput of the server does not increase any more and reaches a critical value, and at the same time, the server is in a high-load carrying state, and at this time, the service life of the hardware resources of the server is easily affected. Therefore, the throughput of the server and the concurrency number of the preset pressure measurement script are required to be in a linear relationship, in other words, an extreme concurrency value exists at an inflection point where the throughput of the server is no longer in a linear relationship with the concurrency number.
In addition, the hardware device of the server may not reach the performance bottleneck as a preset test condition, that is, the server is required to be in a pressure test process, and the use state of each hardware resource is not fully occupied, or reaches a critical value corresponding to the hardware device, and the like. The type of the hardware device is not particularly limited, and may generally include, but is not limited to, a CPU, a network, a memory, a hard disk, and the like, and corresponds to a CPU occupancy rate, a network occupancy rate, a memory occupancy rate, and a hard disk occupancy rate, respectively. Of course, it is easily understood that there is a difference in performance bottlenecks of different hardware resources, and there is no corresponding performance bottleneck setting for each hardware device. The skilled person can set a corresponding performance bottleneck for each hardware device before performing the stress test, for example, when the CPU occupancy reaches 85%, it can be considered that the CPU is already at the performance bottleneck at this time.
Of course, in the above embodiment, the throughput rate and the hardware resource state of the server are used as the test standard for the server pressure test, and those skilled in the art may also use other parameters of the server as the test standard for the pressure test, such as the temperature of the server motherboard, the rotational speed of the fan, the response time of the server, and the like, which are not limited herein by way of example.
Specifically, as a preferred embodiment of this step, when executing this step, the concurrency number of the preset pressure measurement script may be continuously increased by a preset increment unit, and a two-dimensional table diagram of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server changing with the concurrency number is obtained, and then the limit concurrency value is determined according to the two-dimensional table diagram.
The preset increment unit is not limited, and may be set according to hardware resources of the server. Due to the difference of the limit concurrency values of different hardware resources, the preset increment unit of the server with better hardware resources can be set to be larger, for example, 100 or 200 increments each time. Further, the preset increment unit does not necessarily have to be a fixed value, and it may be a variable value.
How to confirm the limit concurrency value is not particularly limited, and a two-dimensional table diagram as described above may be used, the limit concurrency value may be confirmed according to a functional relationship between the test amount and the concurrency number, and the like. It should be noted that if multiple test criteria are used, the ultimate concurrency value obtained should be obtained by considering the multiple test criteria in combination, and should not be an ultimate concurrency value that merely meets the individual test criteria.
The following describes the present step by taking the throughput rate and the hardware resource state of the server as the test standards for the server stress test, and taking three conditions, namely, the throughput rate of the server and the concurrency number of the preset stress test script are in a linear relationship, and the hardware device of the server does not reach the performance bottleneck, as preset test conditions to perform the stress test on the langue server NF2180M3, as an example, see fig. 2 and 3, fig. 2 is a graph of the throughput rate and the concurrency number provided by the embodiment of the present application, fig. 3 is a graph of the resource usage rate and the concurrency number provided by the embodiment of the present application, as can be seen from fig. 2 and 3, the throughput rate has a higher linear slope when the concurrency number is (0,4000), i.e., the increase amplitude is faster, and as the concurrency number exceeds 4000, the linear slope with the concurrency number is obviously decreased, and the average response time is single digit when the concurrency number is (0,4000), when the concurrency number is (4000,8000), the concurrency number is increased from 6ms to 111ms, the increase of the concurrency number in the two intervals is the same, but the increase rate of the average response time is obviously different, and obviously, the lower the average response time is, the better the operation state of the server is. A similar conclusion can be obtained from the analysis of fig. 3 in the same way, and therefore, it can be concluded that the limit concurrency value of the wave-tide trust server NF2180M3 is 4000.
The above process is only a process of obtaining a limit concurrency value for an actual test process and a corresponding result and result analysis provided by the present application. Other preset test conditions, or other test standards, or other methods for determining the limit concurrency value may be set by one skilled in the art and are within the scope of the present application.
S103: controlling the server to operate at the limit concurrency value or less.
After obtaining the limit concurrency value, it is necessary to control the server to operate below the limit concurrency value, that is, the total number of applications or scripts or programs executed by the server during operation should be less than the limit concurrency value, otherwise, the service life and the working performance of the server will be affected. Of course, to ensure the maximum processing power of the server, the server may be made to run continuously at the limit concurrency value, i.e., to maintain the highest application processing level at all times.
The server is subjected to pressure testing by the aid of the preset pressure testing script, so that a limit concurrency value of the server under a current resource environment is obtained, the server can operate at high efficiency under the condition that the limit concurrency value is not higher than the limit concurrency value, and the problems that the service life of the server is damaged due to operation under ultrahigh concurrency value when the limit concurrency value of the server is not determined, the processing efficiency is low, the performance conversion rate is low and the like are solved, so that the service persistence device is ensured to operate at high efficiency and high stability, and the service life of the server is prolonged.
On the basis of the above embodiments, as a preferred embodiment, the limit concurrency value may also be used for payload calculation. For example, an internet company needs to meet the requirement that 50 thousands of applications are online at the same time, and needs to purchase a hardware server for support. Then, based on the threshold concurrency value, the number of purchased units is approximately equal to the number of concurrent units divided by the threshold concurrency value. Taking the wave-tide english server NF2180M3 as an example, 125 servers can be purchased at this time, so that each server operates at the limit concurrency value of 4000, and the service life of the server is not affected additionally, thereby being beneficial to improving the production efficiency and reducing the operation and maintenance cost of the server.
In the following, an operation system of a server provided by an embodiment of the present application is introduced, and the operation system described below and the operation method of the server described above may be referred to correspondingly.
Fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of an operating system of a server according to an embodiment of the present application, where the system includes:
an obtaining module 100, configured to obtain a preset pressure measurement script;
the concurrency number determining module 200 is configured to perform a pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script under a preset test condition, so as to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
an operation module 300, configured to control the server to operate at the concurrency value not higher than the limit.
Based on the above embodiment, as a preferred embodiment, the concurrency number determining module 200 includes:
the testing unit is used for continuously increasing the concurrency number of the preset pressure testing script by a preset increasing unit and obtaining a two-dimensional table graph of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server along with the change of the concurrency number;
and the concurrency number determining unit is used for determining the limit concurrency value according to the two-dimensional table diagram.
Based on the above embodiment, as a preferred embodiment, the method may further include:
and the script recording module is used for recording the preset pressure measurement script by using a meter or loadrunner.
The present application also provides a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which, when executed, may implement the steps provided by the above-described embodiments. The storage medium may include: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.
The application also provides a server, which may include a memory and a processor, where the memory stores a computer program, and the processor may implement the steps provided by the foregoing embodiments when calling the computer program in the memory. Of course, the server may also include various network interfaces, power supplies, and the like.
The embodiments are described in a progressive manner in the specification, each embodiment focuses on differences from other embodiments, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other. For the system provided by the embodiment, the description is relatively simple because the system corresponds to the method provided by the embodiment, and the relevant points can be referred to the method part for description.
The principles and embodiments of the present application are explained herein using specific examples, which are provided only to help understand the method and the core idea of the present application. It should be noted that, for those skilled in the art, it is possible to make several improvements and modifications to the present application without departing from the principle of the present application, and such improvements and modifications also fall within the scope of the claims of the present application.
It is further noted that, in the present specification, relational terms such as first and second, and the like are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Also, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other identical elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

Claims (9)

1. A method of operating a server, comprising:
acquiring a preset pressure measurement script;
under the condition that a preset test condition is met, carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
controlling the server to operate at the limit concurrency value or less.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the preset test conditions include no exception in a pressure test process, a linear relationship between a throughput rate of the server and a concurrency number of the preset pressure test script, and a condition that a hardware device of the server does not reach a performance bottleneck.
3. The operating method according to claim 1, wherein the step of performing a pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script to obtain a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server comprises:
continuously increasing the concurrency number of the preset pressure measurement script by a preset increasing unit, and obtaining a two-dimensional table graph of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server along with the change of the concurrency number;
and confirming the limit concurrency value according to the two-dimensional table graph.
4. The method of operation of claim 1, further comprising:
and recording the preset pressure measurement script by using a meter or loadrunner.
5. An operating system of a server, comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring a preset pressure measurement script;
the concurrency number determining module is used for carrying out pressure test on the server by using the preset pressure test script under the condition that a preset test condition is met, and obtaining a limit concurrency value corresponding to the server;
and the operation module is used for controlling the server to operate under the condition that the concurrency value is not higher than the limit.
6. The operating system of claim 5, wherein the concurrency number determination module comprises:
the testing unit is used for continuously increasing the concurrency number of the preset pressure testing script by a preset increasing unit and obtaining a two-dimensional table graph of the throughput rate and/or the resource utilization rate of the server along with the change of the concurrency number;
and the concurrency number determining unit is used for determining the limit concurrency value according to the two-dimensional table diagram.
7. The operating system of claim 5, further comprising:
and the script recording module is used for recording the preset pressure measurement script by using a meter or loadrunner.
8. A computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, which, when being executed by a processor, carries out the steps of the method of operation according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
9. A server, characterized in that it comprises a memory in which a computer program is stored and a processor which, when it calls the computer program in the memory, implements the steps of the operating method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
CN202010537375.7A 2020-06-12 2020-06-12 Server operation method, operation system and related device Pending CN111740880A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010537375.7A CN111740880A (en) 2020-06-12 2020-06-12 Server operation method, operation system and related device

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202010537375.7A CN111740880A (en) 2020-06-12 2020-06-12 Server operation method, operation system and related device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111740880A true CN111740880A (en) 2020-10-02

Family

ID=72649123

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202010537375.7A Pending CN111740880A (en) 2020-06-12 2020-06-12 Server operation method, operation system and related device

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111740880A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112506751A (en) * 2020-11-27 2021-03-16 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Method, device, equipment and medium for contrast test of overall performance of server

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050125188A1 (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-06-09 Dell Products L.P. Method and system for information handling system automated and distributed test
CN106610896A (en) * 2015-10-27 2017-05-03 滴滴(中国)科技有限公司 Adaptive pressure testing method and device
CN108551465A (en) * 2018-03-09 2018-09-18 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 The concurrent digital control method of server, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN110347559A (en) * 2019-07-18 2019-10-18 浪潮商用机器有限公司 A kind of test method of server energy consumption, device, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing
CN110780990A (en) * 2019-09-12 2020-02-11 中移(杭州)信息技术有限公司 Performance detection method, performance detection device, server and storage medium

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050125188A1 (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-06-09 Dell Products L.P. Method and system for information handling system automated and distributed test
CN106610896A (en) * 2015-10-27 2017-05-03 滴滴(中国)科技有限公司 Adaptive pressure testing method and device
CN108551465A (en) * 2018-03-09 2018-09-18 平安科技(深圳)有限公司 The concurrent digital control method of server, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN110347559A (en) * 2019-07-18 2019-10-18 浪潮商用机器有限公司 A kind of test method of server energy consumption, device, equipment and readable storage medium storing program for executing
CN110780990A (en) * 2019-09-12 2020-02-11 中移(杭州)信息技术有限公司 Performance detection method, performance detection device, server and storage medium

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112506751A (en) * 2020-11-27 2021-03-16 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Method, device, equipment and medium for contrast test of overall performance of server
CN112506751B (en) * 2020-11-27 2022-11-18 浪潮电子信息产业股份有限公司 Method, device, equipment and medium for contrast test of overall performance of server

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6434513B1 (en) Method of load testing web applications based on performance goal
EP3192215B1 (en) Nonintrusive dynamically-scalable network load generation
CN111580954B (en) Extensible distributed data acquisition method and system
Bovenzi et al. Workload characterization for software aging analysis
CN102693177B (en) Fault diagnosing and processing methods of virtual machine as well as device and system thereof
US7035919B1 (en) Method for calculating user weights for thin client sizing tool
US8024737B2 (en) Method and a system that enables the calculation of resource requirements for a composite application
US7090749B2 (en) Method and apparatus for simulating application workloads on an e-business application server
JP5617914B2 (en) Throughput maintenance support system, apparatus, method, and program
CN108763089B (en) Test method, device and system
US9235492B2 (en) Control policy adjusting apparatus, method of adjusting control policy, and program
Roy et al. A capacity planning process for performance assurance of component-based distributed systems
CN111026553A (en) Resource scheduling method for offline mixed part operation and server system
JP2023089891A (en) Cluster capacity expansion method and device
CN111431741A (en) Service online method, system, computer device and storage medium
US9317269B2 (en) Systems and methods for installing, managing, and provisioning applications
US20050096877A1 (en) System and method for determination of load monitoring condition and load monitoring program
CN115509875A (en) Server health degree evaluation method and device
CN111740880A (en) Server operation method, operation system and related device
CN112506751A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for contrast test of overall performance of server
CN114297042A (en) Interface pressure performance testing method, device, equipment and storage medium
Chen et al. Towards resource-efficient cloud systems: Avoiding over-provisioning in demand-prediction based resource provisioning
Mi et al. Sizing multi-tier systems with temporal dependence: benchmarks and analytic models
Patil et al. Identification of performance improving factors for web application by performance testing
CN113220552B (en) Method and electronic equipment for limiting application operation number in vehicle-mounted information entertainment system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20201002