[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

CN111181154A - Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method - Google Patents

Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN111181154A
CN111181154A CN201911335704.3A CN201911335704A CN111181154A CN 111181154 A CN111181154 A CN 111181154A CN 201911335704 A CN201911335704 A CN 201911335704A CN 111181154 A CN111181154 A CN 111181154A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
microgrid
power
scene
energy storage
under
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN201911335704.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
谢桦
许寅
滕晓斐
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Jiaotong University
Original Assignee
Beijing Jiaotong University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Jiaotong University filed Critical Beijing Jiaotong University
Priority to CN201911335704.3A priority Critical patent/CN111181154A/en
Publication of CN111181154A publication Critical patent/CN111181154A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/067Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/008Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks involving trading of energy or energy transmission rights
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/28Arrangements for balancing of the load in a network by storage of energy
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/28Arrangements for balancing of the load in a network by storage of energy
    • H02J3/32Arrangements for balancing of the load in a network by storage of energy using batteries with converting means
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02JCIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/38Arrangements for parallely feeding a single network by two or more generators, converters or transformers
    • H02J3/381Dispersed generators
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E10/00Energy generation through renewable energy sources
    • Y02E10/50Photovoltaic [PV] energy
    • Y02E10/56Power conversion systems, e.g. maximum power point trackers
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E70/00Other energy conversion or management systems reducing GHG emissions
    • Y02E70/30Systems combining energy storage with energy generation of non-fossil origin

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a double-layer optimization method for energy storage capacity configuration of interconnected micro-grids, which is used for researching energy storage optimization configuration in each micro-grid and operation strategy optimization problems in each operation scene of the interconnected micro-grids. The upper layer model takes the optimum annual net income after the energy storage is additionally arranged in the interconnected micro-grid as a target, the rated capacity E and the rated power P of the energy storage configured in each micro-grid are optimized respectively, and the lower layer model takes the optimum net income of operation under each scene as a target to formulate the optimum operation strategy of the interconnected micro-grid. Under different operation scenes, the multi-microgrid interconnection operation mode has certain advantages compared with an independent operation mode: under a normal operation scene, the photovoltaic consumption rate can be improved, the electricity purchasing cost of a higher-level power grid is reduced, and the operation economy is improved; when general faults occur, the load recovery amount and recovery time can be improved, and the power supply reliability is improved; when extreme faults occur, the recovery amount and recovery time of the key load can be improved, and the toughness is improved.

Description

Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method
Technical Field
The present invention relates to the field of energy storage systems. And more particularly, to an energy storage capacity configuration method for comprehensively improving the planning economy and the power supply capacity of interconnected micro-grids.
Background
In recent years, with the fact that more and more distributed generator sets such as wind turbine generators and photovoltaic units are connected to a power distribution network, due to the fact that power consumption requirements of partial regions are relieved, a market mechanism for promoting new energy consumption is lacked, the problems of wind abandonment and light abandonment are caused, and the development of new energy power generation industry in China is hindered. The energy storage system is used as an important component in the microgrid, and by means of the characteristic that the energy can flow in two directions and can meet the requirements of power and capacity at the same time, the power generation utilization rate of renewable energy sources can be improved, the output power fluctuation of a distributed power supply is stabilized, the schedulability of the microgrid system is improved, and important guarantee is provided for the stable and economic operation of a power system after large-scale renewable energy source power generation grid connection, the energy storage configuration capacity is an important factor influencing the functional performance of the microgrid system, and the operation stability and the economy of the microgrid system are influenced by the reasonable configuration scheme or not.
With the continuous development of the economic society and the continuous improvement of the power consumption demand, the reliability problem of the microgrid system becomes the focus of the increasing attention of the power system, and the key load can cause significant economic and political influences even if the power is cut off in a short time, so that the improvement of the power supply reliability is one of the important research problems of microgrid planning and operation decision making. Large-scale power failure accidents caused by extreme events such as important equipment faults, manual operation, extreme natural disasters and the like can cause large-scale political and economic loss, casualties and major social influences, so that the scenes with the most serious influence when the extreme faults occur need to be researched aiming at vulnerable weak links in the topology of the micro-grid system. In the micro-grid energy storage planning stage, toughness indexes of the system when extreme disasters occur are taken into consideration, and the energy storage unit is used as an emergency power supply when extreme faults occur and is used for recovering key loads directly connected to the micro-grid and a power distribution network feeder line, so that the power failure time of the key loads can be shortened, and the rapidity of fault recovery is improved.
When an extreme disaster occurs, the micro-grid autonomous system interconnects a plurality of micro-grids with similar geographic positions to form an interconnected micro-grid, and the interconnected micro-grid autonomous system can be also used for improving the toughness of a power distribution network system. Each microgrid is regarded as an independent individual, and through coordinated operation in the interconnected microgrid system, each microgrid supplies power to other microgrids and key loads accessed by feeder lines of the power distribution network on the premise of ensuring normal power supply of the key loads of the microgrid, so that the overall operation economy and toughness level of the interconnected microgrid system can be improved, and the self-healing capability of the power distribution network system in extreme events is improved.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide an energy storage capacity optimal configuration method for interconnected micro-grids, which can realize energy mutual aid among the micro-grids and comprehensively improve the power supply reliability and toughness.
Based on the idea of hierarchical optimization, a double-layer optimization model for energy storage capacity configuration of the interconnected micro-grids is provided, and the problems of energy storage optimization configuration in each micro-grid and operation strategy optimization in each operation scene of the interconnected micro-grids are researched. The upper layer model respectively optimizes the rated capacity E and the rated power P of the energy storage configured in each microgrid by taking the annual net income optimization after the energy storage is additionally arranged in the interconnected microgrid as a target, and the energy storage optimization configuration result in the upper layer model is not only related to an objective function F (X, P, E), an equality constraint G (X, P, E) and an inequality constraint H (X, P, E) of the upper layer optimization problem, but also related to a lower layer optimization result X, wherein X refers to the value of each variable in the function when the objective function of the lower layer model reaches the optimum, and is expressed by the variable X as a function expression formula; based on analysis of interconnection operation modes in different types of operation scenes, the lower layer model takes the operation net income optimization in each scene as a target to make an optimal operation strategy of the interconnection microgrid, the lower layer optimization problem is composed of an objective function f (X, P, E), an equality constraint g (X, P, E) and an inequality constraint h (X, P, E), and the optimization result is simultaneously influenced by the energy storage configuration P, E in the upper layer optimization model problem.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:
an interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method comprises the following steps:
step 1: assuming the configuration capacities of a non-schedulable distributed generation (NDDG) unit and a schedulable distributed generation (DDG) unit in each microgrid, the required power of each level of load is a known quantity; wherein the variable subscripts I, II, III represent the load class, s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000031
represents an operational scenario and
Figure BDA0002330870920000032
respectively representing a normal operation scene, a general fault scene and an extreme fault scene, wherein the duration of each scene is 24h, i,
Figure BDA0002330870920000033
the responses of the representative piconets, t,
Figure BDA0002330870920000034
representing the study period in hours.
Step 2: and establishing an upper layer model objective function of the interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model, wherein the upper layer model objective function optimizes the rated capacity E and the rated power P of the energy storage configured in each micro-grid by taking the annual net income f optimal after the energy storage is additionally arranged in the interconnected micro-grid as a target.
And step 3: establishing a lower-layer model objective function of an interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model, wherein the lower-layer model objective function is calculated according to the running net income I under each scenesOptimizing X to obtain optimal operation strategy of interconnected microgrid, wherein X refers to the value of each variable in the function when the objective function of the underlying model is optimal and comprises binary variable Bin, integer variable Int, continuous variable Con, semi-continuous variable Scon and semi-integer variable Sint。
And 4, step 4: and (3) calling a cplexmill function to solve X by adopting MATLAB to the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model established in the step (2) and the step (3).
On the basis of the above scheme, the upper layer model objective function in step 2 is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000041
Figure BDA0002330870920000042
Figure BDA0002330870920000043
Figure BDA0002330870920000044
Figure BDA0002330870920000045
wherein, each micro-grid i is used in the upper layer model objective function,
Figure BDA0002330870920000046
rated capacity of internal energy storage
Figure BDA0002330870920000047
And rated power
Figure BDA0002330870920000048
As a decision variable, the annual net income f after the energy storage is additionally arranged in each microgrid is optimized, wherein the f comprises the annual equivalent investment cost of the energy storage in each microgrid
Figure BDA0002330870920000049
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure BDA00023308709200000410
Annual installation costs
Figure BDA00023308709200000411
Optimizing under each operation scene s to obtain the optimal operation net income expectation NE of the years(Is);
Initial investment cost of energy storage and investment cost c of unit power thereofP(yuan/kW), investment cost per unit volume cERelated to (yuan/kWh), and converting the conversion rate r and the planning age L of the interconnected micro-grid into equivalent investment cost of energy storage year
Figure BDA00023308709200000412
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure BDA00023308709200000413
And unit operation maintenance cost co(yuan/kW) is in direct proportion; annual installation costs
Figure BDA00023308709200000414
And unit installation cost cs(yuan/kWh) is proportional; net operating revenue expectation, N · Es(Is) The optimal operation net income I of the interconnected micro-grid in the operation days N (days) and each operation scene s of the lower model objective function contained in the yearsAnd the occurrence probability Pr(s) thereof.
The constraints of the upper layer model include:
the upper limit of investment in the initial stage of energy storage is restricted; energy storage rated power and rated capacity lower limit constraint; reliability index constraint; constraint of toughness indexes;
on the basis of the scheme, the upper limit of the initial investment of the energy storage in the step 2 is restricted as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000051
wherein, STIF is the upper limit value of the energy storage investment of the microgrid in a short period;
the lower limit constraints of the energy storage rated power and the rated capacity are as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000052
Figure BDA0002330870920000053
wherein, when the formula (7) shows that the fault occurs, the DDG unit and the stored energy in the microgrid i can respectively output rated output thereof
Figure BDA0002330870920000054
Supporting the peak loads of class I and II
Figure BDA0002330870920000055
Normal operation is carried out;
the formula (8) shows that when a fault occurs, the DDG unit and the energy storage unit in the microgrid I can at least support the peak loads of the I level and the II level in the microgrid to operate for T hours,
Figure BDA0002330870920000056
SoCthe upper and lower limits of the State of Charge (SoC) of the energy storage unit are respectively.
The reliability index constraints are:
Figure BDA0002330870920000057
the reliability index is defined as a general fault scenario
Figure BDA0002330870920000058
Load power failure time expectation, T, of interconnected micro-gridsi.sFor the load power failure time of the microgrid i in the scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000059
is the upper limit of the reliability index;
the toughness index constraint is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000061
setting the toughness index as an extreme fault scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000062
In the interior, the weight coefficient gamma for quantifying the load criticality of level I, II is consideredI、γIIAnd then, the obtained expected power failure time T of the key load of the interconnected microgridI.i.s、TII.i.sThe power failure time of the I, II-grade load of the microgrid i in the scene s is respectively, and RS is the upper limit of the toughness index.
On the basis of the above scheme, the lower layer model objective function in step 3 is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000063
Figure BDA0002330870920000064
Figure BDA0002330870920000065
Figure BDA0002330870920000066
Figure BDA0002330870920000067
Figure BDA0002330870920000068
Figure BDA0002330870920000069
Figure BDA00023308709200000610
running net profit I by lower layer model objective function under each running scene ssOptimal target, operation strategy for each scene
Figure BDA00023308709200000611
Is optimized, IsSelling electricity revenue from interconnected micro-grids
Figure BDA00023308709200000612
Extreme fault scenario
Figure BDA00023308709200000613
Revenue from recovering critical loads on feeder lines of distribution network
Figure BDA00023308709200000614
DDG Unit Fuel cost
Figure BDA00023308709200000615
Start-stop costHigher-level power grid electricity purchasing cost
Figure BDA00023308709200000617
General fault scenarios and extreme fault scenarios
Figure BDA00023308709200000618
Lower shedding load penalty cost
Figure BDA00023308709200000619
Energy storage decay cost
Figure BDA0002330870920000071
Composition is carried out;
g in the lower model object function formulat(yuan/kWh) is the price of the unit micro-grid load electricity selling,
Figure BDA0002330870920000072
load power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA0002330870920000073
load power is inscribed for the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA0002330870920000074
power of an NDDG unit of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s is cut off; in the formula, ct(yuan/kWh) is the unit profit for restoring the power supply of the key load of the distribution network,
Figure BDA0002330870920000075
recovering the key load power of the power distribution network within a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula, cf(yuan/kW) is the unit fuel cost of the DDG unit,
Figure BDA0002330870920000076
outputting power for the DDG unit in a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula, cU、cD(Yuan/time) is unit startup and shutdown cost, delta P of the uniti.s.tIs the output unbalanced power of the microgrid i in the period t under the scene s, delta P'i.s.tto account for the actual outlet imbalance power after the line loss rate ηi.s.t、bξi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that binary variables describing the on and off states of a DDG unit in a time period t of a micro-grid i under a scene s are respectively described; in the formula mt(yuan/kWh) is the electricity purchasing cost of a unit power grid,
Figure BDA0002330870920000077
purchasing power for a superior power grid of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s; in the formula cl(yuan/kWh) is the penalty cost for load blackout,
Figure BDA0002330870920000078
for load shedding power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000079
respectively representing the discharge power of the stored energy and the charging power of the stored energy,
Figure BDA00023308709200000710
respectively representing the time period t of stored energy in the microgrid i under the scene sThe stored electric quantity, the binary variable of the DDG unit operation state and the binary variable of the energy storage operation state, Ti.sFor the load power off time of the microgrid i under the scene s, cPThe unit price of the degradation cost of the energy storage battery is shown, h is the slope of a linear approximate function of the degradation of the energy storage life and the number of charge and discharge cycles, and delta t is shown as a time interval.
The constraints of the underlying model include: distributed power supply operation constraints; energy storage charging and discharging operation constraint; inter-microgrid power exchange constraints; load shedding power constraint; recovering power constraints from critical loads on the feeder of the distribution network; a controllable distributed power supply total fuel amount constraint;
on the basis of the scheme, the operation constraint of the distributed power supply is as follows (1):
Figure BDA0002330870920000081
Figure BDA0002330870920000082
Figure BDA0002330870920000083
Figure BDA0002330870920000084
Figure BDA0002330870920000085
Figure BDA0002330870920000086
wherein, equation (19) is the NDDG unit to remove the power constraint,
Figure BDA0002330870920000087
outputting power for an NDDG unit of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA0002330870920000088
power of an NDDG unit of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s is cut off; equations (21) to (24) are the operating constraints of the DDG unit;
Figure BDA0002330870920000089
the rated output of the DDG unit in the microgrid i is obtained.
Equation (20) is the DDG unit output upper and lower limit constraints,
Figure BDA00023308709200000810
for the DDG unit output power of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s,
Figure BDA00023308709200000811
and
Figure BDA00023308709200000812
the running states of the DDG units in the time period t and the time period t-1 in the scene s of the microgrid i are respectively binary variables; equations (21) and (22) are the DDG unit shortest on-off time constraint, UTi、DTiThe shortest startup and shutdown time; equations (23), (24) are constraints describing the relationship between three binary variables.
(2) Energy storage charge and discharge operation constraint
Figure BDA00023308709200000813
Figure BDA00023308709200000814
Figure BDA00023308709200000815
Figure BDA0002330870920000091
Figure BDA0002330870920000092
Figure BDA0002330870920000093
Figure BDA0002330870920000094
Wherein,
Figure BDA0002330870920000095
in order to store the binary variables of the running state in the microgrid i in the scene s within the time period t,
Figure BDA0002330870920000096
when the energy storage state is 1, the energy storage is in a discharging state, otherwise, the energy storage is in a charging or idle state; the formula (27) is charge-discharge cycle number constraint, the charge-discharge conversion number of the stored energy in the microgrid i in the scene s should not exceed K, namely the charge-discharge cycle number of the stored energy in the scene should not exceed K/2, and the highest charge-discharge cycle number in one day is 2 times specified in the application; ei.s.tAnd Ei.s.t-1respectively storing the stored electric quantity in a time period t and a time period t-1 of the microgrid i in a scene s, wherein eta is the energy storage and discharge efficiency, and the formula (30) represents that the microgrid i is in a normal operation scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000097
Next, the influence of energy storage charge-discharge cycles on the operation life of the energy storage device needs to be considered, so that the state of charge of the energy storage device at the starting time and the ending time of a scene is the same; due to the fault scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000098
Since the return of the power supply to the load is preferably ensured, the initial state of charge of the stored energy is defined in equation (31) as the setpoint Ei.s.0
And the power exchange constraint between the micro-grids is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000099
Figure BDA00023308709200000910
Figure BDA00023308709200000911
this is an inter-piconet power exchange constraint under three types of operating scenarios.
Wherein, Δ Pi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that unbalanced power is output by a microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s, when the unbalanced power is a positive value, it is indicated that surplus power can be transmitted to other microgrids for power supply in the microgrid, and when the unbalanced power is a negative value, it is indicated that power shortage exists in the microgrid, and electric energy needs to be transmitted to the microgrid by a superior microgrid or other microgrids for load recovery; due to the existence of the distributed power source energy storage units in the micro-grids, power transmission among the micro-grids has bidirectionality, and the line loss in the power transmission process among the micro-grids is considered to be delta P 'in order to avoid the power loss caused by unnecessary power transmission among the micro-grids'i.s.tin order to account for the actual outlet unbalanced power after the line loss rate η', the power transmission between the microgrid and the upper power grid is specified to have unidirectionality in the formula (34).
The three types of operation scenes comprise: under normal operation scene, general fault scene and extreme fault scene;
the micro-grid power exchange constraint in the normal operation scene is
Figure BDA0002330870920000101
Figure BDA0002330870920000102
The formulas (35) and (36) show that in a normal operation scene s, when the microgrid with power shortage and the microgrid with excess power form the interconnected microgrid within a time period t
Figure BDA0002330870920000103
Then, first, at
Figure BDA0002330870920000104
Internally satisfying power balance, secondly
Figure BDA0002330870920000105
When the whole power is still in shortage, the power is supplied by the superior power grid; micro-grid not affected by faults and still in independent grid-connected operation state
Figure BDA0002330870920000106
The power balance is formed between the independent power grid and the superior power grid,
Figure BDA0002330870920000107
the method is a microgrid set in an interconnected microgrid formed in a time period t under a scene s.
The microgrid power exchange constraint under the general fault scene is
Figure BDA0002330870920000108
Figure BDA0002330870920000109
Figure BDA0002330870920000111
Figure BDA0002330870920000112
This is the period of no failure under the general failure scenario s
Figure BDA0002330870920000113
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the failure time period
Figure BDA0002330870920000114
Inside, receive each microgrid of fault influence conversion to island operation
Figure BDA0002330870920000115
After interconnection, the microgrid gc is close to the geographic position, is not influenced by faults and normally operates in a grid-connected modesInterconnection, namely integrally converting the interconnected micro-grid into grid-connected operation by forming the interconnected micro-grid to finish load recovery in a failure period; in the fault period, other micro-grids which are not influenced by the fault and are not interconnected with the fault micro-grid are subjected to fault treatment
Figure BDA0002330870920000116
Still operating in an independent grid-connected state.
The microgrid power exchange constraint under the extreme fault scene is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000117
Figure BDA0002330870920000118
Figure BDA0002330870920000119
this is the period of no failure under the extreme failure scenario s
Figure BDA00023308709200001110
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the period of extreme fault occurrence
Figure BDA00023308709200001111
Because the fault of the upper-level power grid is caused, all the micro-grids are converted into isolated island operation after being interconnected, and the load on the feeder line of the power distribution network can be recovered when the surplus power is still available on the premise of ensuring the power supply of the key load in the interconnected micro-grids,
Figure BDA00023308709200001112
and (4) the power of the key load of the feeder line of the power distribution network recovered by the microgrid i within a time period t under the scene s.
The load shedding power constraint is as follows:
Figure BDA00023308709200001113
the upper and lower limits of each level of load shedding power are constrained under a fault scene s;
the key load recovery power constraint on the feeder line of the power distribution network is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000121
this is a critical load recovery power constraint on the distribution feeder under extreme fault scenario s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000122
power to be recovered for the key load of the power distribution network within the time period t;
the total fuel quantity constraint of the controllable distributed power supply is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000123
when extreme disasters occur, fuel storage shortage and difficult replenishment in the micro-grid can be caused due to damage of gas transportation pipelines and ground traffic paralysis, so that the power generation amount of the DDG unit is limited, which is the restriction of the total fuel amount upper limit of the DDG unit in an extreme fault scene,
Figure BDA0002330870920000124
the power generation amount of the DDG unit in the microgrid i under the extreme fault scene s is the upper limit value.
On the basis of the scheme, the solving of the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model in the step 4 comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: arranging the energy storage capacity configured double-layer optimization model into a single-layer model, which is shown in the following formula;
Figure BDA0002330870920000125
step 4-2: converting nonlinear constraint conditions appearing in the converted single-layer model into linear constraint conditions by a large M method, wherein the linear constraint conditions are shown as the following formula;
Figure BDA0002330870920000126
Figure BDA0002330870920000127
Figure BDA0002330870920000131
Figure BDA0002330870920000132
wherein: m is an arbitrarily large penalty factor, and M > 0.
Step 4-3: and (3) after r, Aineq, bineq, Aeq, beq, lb and ub which are required by model solution are constructed, adopting MATLAB to call a cplexmill function to solve X.
The variable x to be optimized may include a binary variable (Bin), an integer variable (Int), a continuous variable (Con), a semi-continuous variable (Scon), and a semi-integer variable (Sint);
aineq and Aeq refer to coefficient matrixes before variables to be optimized in constraint conditions of objective functions of upper and lower layers of models, bineq and beq refer to constant column vectors on the right side of inequality constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models and constant column vectors on the right side of equal signs of the equality constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively, and lb and ub refer to constant column vectors on the left and right sides of the inequality signs of the variables to be optimized in the constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively.
The invention has the beneficial effects that:
the invention establishes an energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model for comprehensively improving the reliability and toughness of power supply in a short period. Compared with an independent operation mode, the energy storage capacity configuration in the internet micro-network is lower; under different operation scenes, the multi-microgrid has certain advantages compared with an independent operation mode under an interconnected operation mode: under a normal operation scene, the photovoltaic consumption rate can be improved, the electricity purchasing cost of a superior power grid is reduced, and the operation economy is improved through mutual electric energy coordination among micro grids; when a general fault occurs, load recovery amount and recovery time can be improved and power supply reliability is improved through interconnection and grid-connected operation among the micro grids; when extreme faults occur, the stored energy can be used as an emergency power supply, and the key load recovery amount and recovery time can be improved through mutual assistance of electric energy among micro-grids, so that the toughness is improved.
Drawings
The invention has the following drawings:
fig. 1 is a block diagram of a two-layer optimization model for energy storage capacity configuration.
Fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of an interconnected microgrid including three microgrids as an interconnected microgrid.
Detailed Description
In order to more clearly illustrate the present invention, the present invention will be further described with reference to the following examples and the accompanying drawings 1-2.
Assuming the configuration capacity of a non-schedulable distributed generation (NDDG) unit and a schedulable distributed generation (DDG) unit in each microgrid, the required power of each stage of load is a known quantity. The variable indices I, II, III represent the load classes,
Figure BDA0002330870920000141
represents an operational scenario and
Figure BDA0002330870920000142
respectively representing a normal operation scene, a general fault scene and an extreme fault scene, wherein the duration of each scene is 24h,
Figure BDA0002330870920000143
the micro-grid is represented by,
Figure BDA0002330870920000144
representing the study period in hours.
1. An upper layer model objective function of the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model is established as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000145
Figure BDA0002330870920000146
Figure BDA0002330870920000147
Figure BDA0002330870920000148
Figure BDA0002330870920000151
wherein, each microgrid is arranged in the upper layer model
Figure BDA0002330870920000152
Rated capacity of internal energy storage
Figure BDA0002330870920000153
And rated power
Figure BDA0002330870920000154
As a decision variable, the annual net income f after the energy storage is additionally arranged in each microgrid is optimized, wherein the f comprises the annual equivalent investment cost of the energy storage in each microgrid
Figure BDA0002330870920000155
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure BDA0002330870920000156
Annual installation costs
Figure BDA0002330870920000157
Optimizing under each operation scene s to obtain the optimal operation net income expectation NE of the years(Is);
Initial energy storage throwingCapital cost and investment cost per unit power cP(yuan/kW), investment cost per unit volume cERelated to (yuan/kWh), and converting the conversion rate r and the planning age L of the interconnected micro-grid into equivalent investment cost of energy storage year
Figure BDA0002330870920000158
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure BDA0002330870920000159
And unit operation maintenance cost co(yuan/kW) is in direct proportion; annual installation costs
Figure BDA00023308709200001510
And unit installation cost cs(yuan/kWh) is proportional; net operating revenue expectation, N · Es(Is) The optimal operation net income I under each operation scene s of the lower layer is determined by the operation days N (days) of the interconnected micro-grids contained in one yearsAnd the occurrence probability Pr(s) thereof.
The constraints of the upper layer model include:
the upper limit of investment in the initial stage of energy storage is restricted; energy storage rated power and rated capacity lower limit constraint; reliability index constraint; constraint of toughness indexes;
(1) the upper limit of the investment in the initial energy storage stage is restricted as follows:
Figure BDA00023308709200001511
and the STIF is an upper limit value of the micro-grid energy storage investment in a short period.
(2) The lower limit constraints of the energy storage rated power and the rated capacity are as follows:
Figure BDA00023308709200001512
Figure BDA00023308709200001513
wherein, the formula (7) represents the DDG unit in the microgrid i when the fault occursAnd the stored energy can be rated at its output
Figure BDA0002330870920000161
Supporting the peak loads of class I and II
Figure BDA0002330870920000162
Normal operation is carried out;
the formula (8) shows that when a fault occurs, the DDG unit and the energy storage unit in the microgrid I can at least support the peak loads of the I level and the II level in the microgrid to operate for T hours,
Figure BDA0002330870920000163
SoCthe upper and lower limits of the State of Charge (SoC) of the energy storage unit are respectively.
(3) The reliability index constraints are:
Figure BDA0002330870920000164
the reliability index is defined as a general fault scenario
Figure BDA0002330870920000165
Load power failure time expectation, T, of interconnected micro-gridsi.sFor the load power failure time of the microgrid i in the scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000166
is the upper limit of the reliability index;
(4) the toughness index constraint is as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000167
setting the toughness index as an extreme fault scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000168
In the interior, the weight coefficient gamma for quantifying the load criticality of level I, II is consideredI、γIILater, the obtained expectation of the power failure time of the key load of the interconnected microgrid,TI.i.s、TII.i.sRespectively representing the power failure time of I, II-grade load of the microgrid i in the scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000169
the upper limit of the toughness index.
2. The lower layer model objective function of the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model is established as follows:
Figure BDA00023308709200001610
Figure BDA0002330870920000171
Figure BDA0002330870920000172
Figure BDA0002330870920000173
Figure BDA0002330870920000174
Figure BDA0002330870920000175
Figure BDA0002330870920000176
Figure BDA0002330870920000177
running the lower layer model under each running scene s to obtain net profit IsOptimal target, operation strategy for each scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000178
Is optimized, IsInterconnected micro-grid electricity selling methodGain of
Figure BDA0002330870920000179
Extreme fault scenario
Figure BDA00023308709200001710
Revenue from recovering critical loads on feeder lines of distribution network
Figure BDA00023308709200001711
DDG Unit Fuel cost
Figure BDA00023308709200001712
Start-stop cost
Figure BDA00023308709200001713
Higher-level power grid electricity purchasing cost
Figure BDA00023308709200001714
General fault scenarios and extreme fault scenarios
Figure BDA00023308709200001715
Lower shedding load penalty cost
Figure BDA00023308709200001716
Energy storage decay cost
Figure BDA00023308709200001717
And (4) forming.
Lower layer objective function formula gt(yuan/kWh) is the price of the unit micro-grid load electricity selling,
Figure BDA00023308709200001718
load power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA00023308709200001719
load power is inscribed for the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA00023308709200001720
time period under scene s for microgrid ithe NDDG unit within t cuts off power; in the formula, ct(yuan/kWh) is the unit profit for restoring the power supply of the key load of the distribution network,
Figure BDA00023308709200001721
recovering the key load power of the power distribution network within a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula, cf(yuan/kW) is the unit fuel cost of the DDG unit,
Figure BDA00023308709200001722
outputting power for the DDG unit in a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula cU、cD(Yuan/time) is unit startup and shutdown cost, delta P of the uniti.s.tIs the output unbalanced power of the microgrid i in the period t under the scene s, delta P'i.s.tto account for the actual outlet imbalance power after the line loss rate ηi.s.t、bξi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that binary variables describing the on and off states of a DDG unit in a time period t of a micro-grid i under a scene s are respectively described; in the formula mt(yuan/kWh) is the electricity purchasing cost of a unit power grid,
Figure BDA0002330870920000181
purchasing power for a superior power grid of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s; in the formula cl(yuan/kWh) is the penalty cost for load blackout,
Figure BDA0002330870920000182
for load shedding power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000183
respectively representing the discharge power of the stored energy and the charging power of the stored energy,
Figure BDA0002330870920000184
respectively representing the stored electric quantity of the stored energy in a period T of the micro-grid i in a scene s, the binary variable of the operation state of the DDG unit and the binary variable of the energy storage operation state, Ti.sFor the load power off time of the microgrid i under the scene s, cPThe unit price of the declining cost of the energy storage battery is shown, and h is the energy storage lifeThe slope of a linear approximation function of the life decay and the number of charge-discharge cycles, Δ t, is expressed as a time interval.
The constraints of the underlying model include: distributed power supply operation constraints; energy storage charging and discharging operation constraint; inter-microgrid power exchange constraints; load shedding power constraint; recovering power constraints from critical loads on the feeder of the distribution network; recovering power constraints from critical loads on the feeder of the distribution network;
(1) the distributed power supply operation constraints are as follows:
Figure BDA0002330870920000185
Figure BDA0002330870920000186
Figure BDA0002330870920000187
Figure BDA0002330870920000188
Figure BDA0002330870920000189
Figure BDA00023308709200001810
wherein, equation (19) is the NDDG unit to remove the power constraint,
Figure BDA00023308709200001811
outputting power for an NDDG unit of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s;
Figure BDA00023308709200001812
power of an NDDG unit of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s is cut off; equations (21) to (24) are the operating constraints of the DDG unit;
Figure BDA00023308709200001813
the rated output of the DDG unit in the microgrid i is obtained.
Equation (20) is the DDG unit output upper and lower limit constraints,
Figure BDA0002330870920000191
for the DDG unit output power of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000192
and
Figure BDA0002330870920000193
the running states of the DDG units in the time period t and the time period t-1 in the scene s of the microgrid i are respectively binary variables; equations (21) and (22) are the DDG unit shortest on-off time constraint, UTi、DTiThe shortest startup and shutdown time; equations (23), (24) are constraints describing the relationship between three binary variables.
(2) Energy storage charge and discharge operation constraint
Figure BDA0002330870920000194
Figure BDA0002330870920000195
Figure BDA0002330870920000196
Figure BDA0002330870920000197
Figure BDA0002330870920000198
Figure BDA0002330870920000199
Figure BDA00023308709200001910
Wherein,
Figure BDA00023308709200001911
in order to describe the binary variables of the energy storage operation state in the micro grid i in the scene s within the time period t,
Figure BDA00023308709200001912
when the energy storage state is 1, the energy storage is in a discharging state, otherwise, the energy storage is in a charging or idle state; the formula (27) is charge-discharge cycle number constraint, the charge-discharge conversion number of the stored energy in the microgrid i in the scene s should not exceed K, namely the charge-discharge cycle number of the stored energy in the scene should not exceed K/2, and the highest charge-discharge cycle number in one day is 2 times specified in the application; ei.s.tAnd Ei.s.t-1respectively storing the stored electric quantity in a time period t and a time period t-1 of the microgrid i in a scene s, wherein eta is the energy storage and discharge efficiency, and the formula (30) represents that the microgrid i is in a normal operation scene
Figure BDA00023308709200001913
Next, the influence of energy storage charge-discharge cycles on the operation life of the energy storage device needs to be considered, so that the state of charge of the energy storage device at the starting time and the ending time of a scene is the same; due to the fault scene
Figure BDA0002330870920000201
Since the return of the power supply to the load is preferably ensured, the initial state of charge of the stored energy is defined in equation (31) as the setpoint Ei.s.0
(3) Inter-piconet power exchange constraints
Figure BDA0002330870920000202
Figure BDA0002330870920000203
Figure BDA0002330870920000204
This is an inter-piconet power exchange constraint under three types of operating scenarios.
Wherein, Δ Pi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that unbalanced power is output by a microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s, when the unbalanced power is a positive value, it is indicated that surplus power can be transmitted to other microgrids for power supply in the microgrid, and when the unbalanced power is a negative value, it is indicated that power shortage exists in the microgrid, and electric energy needs to be transmitted to the microgrid by a superior microgrid or other microgrids for load recovery; due to the existence of the distributed power source energy storage units in the micro-grids, power transmission among the micro-grids has bidirectionality, and the line loss in the power transmission process among the micro-grids is considered to be delta P 'in order to avoid the power loss caused by unnecessary power transmission among the micro-grids'i.s.tin order to account for the actual outlet unbalanced power after the line loss rate η', the power transmission between the microgrid and the upper power grid is specified to have unidirectionality in the formula (34).
The three types of operation scenes comprise: under normal operation scene, general fault scene and extreme fault scene;
the micro-grid power exchange constraint in the normal operation scene is
Figure BDA0002330870920000211
Figure BDA0002330870920000212
The formulas (35) and (36) show that in a normal operation scene s, when the microgrid with power shortage and the microgrid with excess power form the interconnected microgrid within a time period t
Figure BDA0002330870920000213
Then, first, at
Figure BDA0002330870920000214
Internally satisfying power balance, secondly
Figure BDA0002330870920000215
When the whole power is still in shortage, the power is supplied by the superior power grid; micro-grid not affected by faults and still in independent grid-connected operation state
Figure BDA0002330870920000216
The power balance is formed between the independent power grid and the superior power grid,
Figure BDA0002330870920000217
the method is a microgrid set in an interconnected microgrid formed in a time period t under a scene s.
The microgrid power exchange constraint under the general fault scene is
Figure BDA0002330870920000218
Figure BDA0002330870920000219
Figure BDA00023308709200002110
Figure BDA00023308709200002111
This is the period of no failure under the general failure scenario s
Figure BDA00023308709200002112
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the failure time period
Figure BDA00023308709200002113
Inside, receive each microgrid of fault influence conversion to island operation
Figure BDA00023308709200002114
After interconnection, the microgrid gc is close to the geographic position, is not influenced by faults and normally operates in a grid-connected modesInterconnection by forming interconnectionThe whole microgrid is converted into grid-connected operation, and load recovery in a failure period is completed; in the fault period, other micro-grids which are not influenced by the fault and are not interconnected with the fault micro-grid are subjected to fault treatment
Figure BDA00023308709200002115
Still operating in an independent grid-connected state.
The microgrid power exchange constraint under the extreme fault scene is
Figure BDA00023308709200002116
Figure BDA0002330870920000221
Figure BDA0002330870920000222
This is the period of no failure under the extreme failure scenario s
Figure BDA0002330870920000223
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the period of extreme fault occurrence
Figure BDA0002330870920000224
Because the fault of the upper-level power grid is caused, all the micro-grids are converted into isolated island operation after being interconnected, and the load on the feeder line of the power distribution network can be recovered when the surplus power is still available on the premise of ensuring the power supply of the key load in the interconnected micro-grids,
Figure BDA0002330870920000225
and (4) the power of the key load of the feeder line of the power distribution network recovered by the microgrid i within a time period t under the scene s.
(4) Load shedding power constraint
Figure BDA0002330870920000226
This is the upper and lower limit constraints of each level of switching load power under the fault scene s.
(5) Critical load recovery power constraints on power distribution network feeders
Figure BDA0002330870920000227
This is a critical load recovery power constraint on the distribution feeder under extreme fault scenario s,
Figure BDA0002330870920000228
and (4) power to be recovered for the key load of the power distribution network in the time period t.
(6) Controllable distributed power total fuel amount constraint
Figure BDA0002330870920000229
When extreme disasters occur, fuel storage shortage and difficult replenishment in the micro-grid can be caused due to damage of gas transportation pipelines and ground traffic paralysis, so that the power generation amount of the DDG unit is limited, which is the restriction of the total fuel amount upper limit of the DDG unit in an extreme fault scene,
Figure BDA00023308709200002210
the power generation amount of the DDG unit in the microgrid i under the extreme fault scene s is the upper limit value.
The model established by the invention is a double-layer mixed integer linear programming problem, the upper layer is a linear programming problem only containing continuous variables, and the lower layer decision variables comprise continuous variables of various units such as output, energy storage charging and discharging power, load shedding power, power failure time and the like, and binary variables describing energy storage charging and discharging states, DDG unit starting and stopping and running states and whether load loss occurs or not, so that the problem is a complex mixed integer linear programming problem.
A typical mixed integer linear programming problem can be expressed as:
minr·x (47)
s.t. Aineq·x≤bineq (48)
Aeq·x=beq (49)
lb≤x≤ub (50)
x∈{Bin,Int,Con,Scon,Sint} (51)
where r, bineq, beq, lb, and ub are column vectors, Aineq and Aeq are matrices, and the variable x to be optimized may include a binary variable (Bin), an integer variable (Int), a continuous variable (Con), a semi-continuous variable (Scon), and a semi-integer variable (Sint). Wherein Aineq and Aeq refer to coefficient matrixes before variables to be optimized in constraint conditions of target functions of upper and lower layers of models, bineq and beq refer to constant column vectors on the right side of inequality constraint conditions of the target functions of the upper and lower layers of models and constant column vectors on the right side of equal signs of the equality constraint conditions of the target functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively, and lb and ub refer to constant column vectors on the left and right sides of the inequality signs of the variables to be optimized in the constraint conditions of the target functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively.
And 4, solving the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model, which comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: arranging the energy storage capacity configured double-layer optimization model into a single-layer model, which is shown in the following formula;
Figure BDA0002330870920000241
step 4-2: converting nonlinear constraint conditions appearing in the converted single-layer model into linear constraint conditions by a large M method, wherein the linear constraint conditions are shown as the following formula;
Figure BDA0002330870920000242
Figure BDA0002330870920000243
Figure BDA0002330870920000244
Figure BDA0002330870920000245
wherein: m is an arbitrarily large penalty factor, and M > 0.
Step 4-3: and (3) after r, Aineq, bineq, Aeq, beq, lb and ub which are required by model solution are constructed, adopting MATLAB to call a cplexmill function to solve X.
The above examples are given for the purpose of illustrating the invention clearly and not for the purpose of limiting the same, and it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, in light of the foregoing description, numerous modifications and variations can be made in the form and details of the embodiments of the invention described herein, and it is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed.

Claims (6)

1. An interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1: assuming the configuration capacity of the non-schedulable distributed power supply unit and the schedulable distributed power supply unit in each microgrid, the required power of each level of load is a known quantity; wherein the variable subscripts I, II, III represent the load class, s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000011
represents an operational scenario and
Figure FDA0002330870910000012
Figure FDA0002330870910000013
respectively representing a normal operation scene, a general fault scene and an extreme fault scene, wherein the duration of each scene is 24h, i,
Figure FDA0002330870910000014
the responses of the representative piconets, t,
Figure FDA0002330870910000015
represents the study period in hours;
step 2: establishing an upper layer model objective function of an interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model, wherein the upper layer model objective function takes the annual net income f after the energy storage is additionally arranged in the interconnected microgrid as a target, and optimizes the rated capacity E and the rated power P of the energy storage configured in each microgrid respectively;
and step 3: establishing a lower-layer model objective function of an interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model, wherein the lower-layer model objective function is calculated according to the running net income I under each scenesOptimizing X to obtain an optimal operation strategy of the interconnected microgrid, wherein X refers to the value of each variable in the function when the objective function of the lower-layer model is optimal and comprises a binary variable Bin, an integer variable Int, a continuous variable Con, a semi-continuous variable Scon and a semi-integer variable Sint;
and 4, step 4: and (3) calling a cplexmill function to solve X by adopting MATLAB to the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model established in the step (2) and the step (3).
2. The interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimization configuration method of claim 1, characterized in that the upper layer model objective function in step 2 is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000021
Figure FDA0002330870910000022
Figure FDA0002330870910000023
Figure FDA0002330870910000024
Figure FDA0002330870910000025
wherein, each micro-grid i is used in the upper layer model objective function,
Figure FDA0002330870910000026
rated capacity of internal energy storage
Figure FDA0002330870910000027
And rated power Pi EAs a decision variable, the annual net income f after the energy storage is additionally arranged in each microgrid is optimized, wherein the f comprises the annual equivalent investment cost of the energy storage in each microgrid
Figure FDA0002330870910000028
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure FDA0002330870910000029
Annual installation costs
Figure FDA00023308709100000210
Optimizing under each operation scene s to obtain the optimal operation net income expectation NE of the years(Is);
Initial investment cost of energy storage and investment cost c of unit power thereofPInvestment cost per unit volume cEIn connection with, cPUnit of (A) is Yuan/kW, cEThe unit of (a) is yuan/kWh, and the conversion rate r and the planning age limit L of the interconnected micro-grid are converted into the equivalent investment cost of the energy storage year
Figure FDA00023308709100000211
Annual operating maintenance costs
Figure FDA00023308709100000212
And unit operation maintenance cost coIs in direct proportion; annual installation costs
Figure FDA00023308709100000213
And unit installation cost csIs in direct proportion; c is mentionedoIn units of yuan/kW, csUnit of (d) is yuan/kWh; net operating revenue expectation, N · Es(Is) The optimal operation net income I of each operation scene s of the lower model objective function is determined by the number of operation days N of the interconnected micro-grids contained in one yearsAnd the occurrence probability Pr(s) of the same;
the constraints of the upper layer model include:
the upper limit of investment in the initial stage of energy storage is restricted; energy storage rated power and rated capacity lower limit constraint; reliability index constraint; and (5) restricting toughness indexes.
3. The interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method of claim 2, characterized in that the energy storage initial investment upper limit constraint of step 2 is:
Figure FDA0002330870910000031
wherein, STIF is the upper limit value of the energy storage investment of the microgrid in a short period;
the lower limit constraints of the energy storage rated power and the rated capacity are as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000032
Figure FDA0002330870910000033
wherein, when the fault occurs, the distributable power supply unit and the energy storage unit in the microgrid i which can be dispatched are respectively rated to output P according to the formula (7)i G.R、Pi ESupporting the peak loads of class I and II
Figure FDA0002330870910000034
Normal operation is carried out;
equation (8) shows that in the microgrid i when a fault occursThe schedulable distributed power supply unit and the energy storage unit at least support I-level and II-level peak loads in the microgrid for operation for T hours,
Figure FDA0002330870910000035
SoCrespectively the upper limit and the lower limit of the charge state of the energy storage unit;
the reliability index constraints are:
Figure FDA0002330870910000036
the reliability index is defined under a general fault scene s
Figure FDA0002330870910000037
Interconnected microgrid load power failure time expectation, Ti.sFor the load power failure time of the microgrid i in the scene s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000038
is the upper limit of the reliability index;
the toughness index constraint is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000039
the toughness index is set within an extreme fault scene s
Figure FDA00023308709100000310
Weight coefficient gamma for quantifying load criticality of level I, III、γIIAnd then, the obtained expected power failure time T of the key load of the interconnected microgridI.i.s、TII.i.sRespectively representing the power failure time of I, II-grade load of the microgrid i in the scene s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000041
the upper limit of the toughness index.
4. The interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimization configuration method of claim 3, characterized in that the lower layer model objective function in step 3 is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000042
Figure FDA0002330870910000043
Figure FDA0002330870910000044
Figure FDA0002330870910000045
Figure FDA0002330870910000046
Figure FDA0002330870910000047
Figure FDA0002330870910000048
Figure FDA0002330870910000049
running net profit I by lower layer model objective function under each running scene ssOptimal target, operation strategy for each scene
Figure FDA00023308709100000410
Is optimized, IsSelling electricity revenue from interconnected micro-grids
Figure FDA00023308709100000411
Extreme fault scenario s
Figure FDA00023308709100000412
Revenue from restoration of critical loads on distribution feeder
Figure FDA00023308709100000413
Schedulable distributed power unit fuel cost
Figure FDA00023308709100000414
Start-stop cost
Figure FDA00023308709100000415
Higher-level power grid electricity purchasing cost
Figure FDA00023308709100000416
General fault scenario and extreme fault scenario s
Figure FDA00023308709100000417
Penalty cost of load shedding
Figure FDA00023308709100000418
Energy storage decay cost
Figure FDA00023308709100000419
Composition is carried out;
g in the lower model object function formulatThe unit micro-grid load electricity selling price is unit of yuan/kWh,
Figure FDA00023308709100000420
load power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure FDA00023308709100000421
load power is inscribed for the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s;
Figure FDA0002330870910000051
cutting off power for the non-dispatchable distributed power supply unit of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s; in the formula, ctThe unit income for recovering the key load power supply of the power distribution network is unit/kWh,
Figure FDA0002330870910000052
recovering the key load power of the power distribution network within a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula, cfIs the unit fuel cost of the schedulable distributed power generating set, the unit is yuan/kW,
Figure FDA0002330870910000053
outputting power for a distributed power supply unit which can be dispatched in a time period t under a scene s for the microgrid i; in the formula, cU、cDRespectively unit startup and shutdown cost of the unit, the unit is Yuan/time, delta Pi.s.tIs the output unbalanced power of the microgrid i in the period t under the scene s, delta P'i.s.tto account for the actual outlet imbalance power after the line loss rate ηi.s.t、bξi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that binary variables describing the on and off states of a schedulable distributed power supply unit of a microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s are respectively described; in the formula mtThe unit of the unit power grid electricity purchasing cost is yuan/kWh,
Figure FDA0002330870910000054
purchasing power for a superior power grid of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s; in the formula clPenalty cost for load blackout, in units of dollars/kWh,
Figure FDA0002330870910000055
for load shedding power of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000056
representing the discharge power of the stored energy and the charge power of the stored energy, respectively, Ei.s.t,
Figure FDA0002330870910000057
Respectively representing the stored electric quantity of the stored energy in a time period T of the microgrid i in a scene s, the binary variable of the operating state of the schedulable distributed power supply unit and the binary variable of the energy storage operating state, Ti.sFor the load power off time of the microgrid i under the scene s, cPThe cost unit price of the energy storage battery decline is represented, h is the slope of a linear approximate function of the energy storage life decline and the number of charge-discharge cycles, and delta t is represented as a time interval;
the constraints of the underlying model include: distributed power supply operation constraints; energy storage charging and discharging operation constraint; inter-microgrid power exchange constraints; load shedding power constraint; recovering power constraints from critical loads on the feeder of the distribution network; a controllable distributed power total fuel constraint.
5. The interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimization configuration method of claim 4, wherein the distributed power supply operation constraints are:
Figure FDA0002330870910000061
Figure FDA0002330870910000062
Figure FDA0002330870910000063
Figure FDA0002330870910000064
Figure FDA0002330870910000065
Figure FDA0002330870910000066
wherein, formula(19) To remove the power constraint for the non-dispatchable distributed power supply unit,
Figure FDA0002330870910000067
outputting power for the non-schedulable distributed power supply unit of the microgrid i in the time period t under the scene s;
Figure FDA0002330870910000068
cutting off power for the non-dispatchable distributed power supply unit of the microgrid i in a time period t under a scene s; equations (21) to (24) are operation constraints of the schedulable distributed power supply unit; pi G.RRated output of a schedulable distributed power supply unit in the microgrid i;
equation (20) is the upper and lower limit constraints on the output of the schedulable distributed power supply unit,
Figure FDA0002330870910000069
for the schedulable distributed power supply unit output power of the microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s,
Figure FDA00023308709100000610
and
Figure FDA00023308709100000611
the binary variables are respectively the operating states of the schedulable distributed power supply units in the time period t and the time period t-1 in the scene s of the microgrid i; equations (21), (22) are the shortest on-off time constraints for schedulable distributed Power units, UTi、DTiThe shortest startup and shutdown time; equations (23), (24) are constraints describing the relationship between three binary variables;
the energy storage charging and discharging operation constraints are as follows:
Figure FDA00023308709100000612
Figure FDA00023308709100000613
Figure FDA0002330870910000071
Figure FDA0002330870910000072
Figure FDA0002330870910000073
Figure FDA0002330870910000074
Figure FDA0002330870910000075
wherein,
Figure FDA0002330870910000076
in order to store the binary variables of the running state in the microgrid i in the scene s within the time period t,
Figure FDA0002330870910000077
when the energy storage state is 1, the energy storage is in a discharging state, otherwise, the energy storage is in a charging or idle state; the formula (27) is charge-discharge cycle number constraint, the charge-discharge conversion number of the stored energy in the microgrid i in the scene s should not exceed K, namely the charge-discharge cycle number of the stored energy in the scene should not exceed K/2, and the highest charge-discharge cycle number in one day is 2 times specified in the application; ei.s.tAnd Ei.s.t-1respectively storing the stored electric quantity in a time period t and a time period t-1 of the microgrid i under a scene s, wherein eta is the energy storage and discharge efficiency, and the formula (30) shows that under a normal operation scene s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000078
the charge states at the initial and end of energy storage are the same; due to the failure scenario s,
Figure FDA0002330870910000079
The return of the power supply to the load should preferably be ensured, so that the initial state of charge of the stored energy is defined in equation (31) as the setpoint value Ei.s.0
And the power exchange constraint between the micro-grids is as follows:
Figure FDA00023308709100000710
Figure FDA00023308709100000711
Figure FDA00023308709100000712
this is the power exchange constraint between the micro-networks under three types of operation scenarios;
wherein, Δ Pi.s.tThe method comprises the steps that unbalanced power is output by a microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s, when the unbalanced power is a positive value, it is indicated that surplus power can be transmitted to other microgrids for power supply in the microgrid, and when the unbalanced power is a negative value, it is indicated that power shortage exists in the microgrid, and electric energy needs to be transmitted to the microgrid by a superior microgrid or other microgrids for load recovery; delta P'i.s.tthe power transmission between the microgrid and the upper-level power grid is specified to have unidirectionality in the formula (34);
the three types of operation scenes comprise: under normal operation scene, general fault scene and extreme fault scene;
the microgrid power exchange constraint in the normal operation scene is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000081
Figure FDA0002330870910000082
the formulas (35) and (36) show that in a normal operation scene s, when the microgrid with power shortage and the microgrid with excess power form the interconnected microgrid within a time period t
Figure FDA0002330870910000083
Then, first, at
Figure FDA0002330870910000084
Internally satisfying power balance, secondly
Figure FDA0002330870910000085
When the whole power is still in shortage, the power is supplied by the superior power grid; but not affected by faults and still in an independent grid-connected operation state,
Figure FDA0002330870910000086
the power balance is formed between the independent power grid and the superior power grid,
Figure FDA0002330870910000087
the method comprises the steps of (1) forming a microgrid set in an interconnected microgrid formed in a time period t under a scene s;
the microgrid power exchange constraint under the general fault scene is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000088
Figure FDA0002330870910000089
Figure FDA00023308709100000810
Figure FDA00023308709100000811
this is the period of no failure under the general failure scenario s
Figure FDA00023308709100000812
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the failure time period
Figure FDA0002330870910000091
In the interior, each microgrid i which is changed into island operation under the influence of faults,
Figure FDA0002330870910000092
after interconnection, the microgrid gc is close to the geographic position, is not influenced by faults and normally operates in a grid-connected modesInterconnection, namely integrally converting the interconnected micro-grid into grid-connected operation by forming the interconnected micro-grid to finish load recovery in a failure period; in the failure period, for other microgrids i which are not affected by the failure and are not interconnected with the failed microgrid at the same time,
Figure FDA0002330870910000093
the system still operates in an independent grid-connected state;
the microgrid power exchange constraint under the extreme fault scene is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000094
Figure FDA0002330870910000095
Figure FDA0002330870910000096
this is the period of no failure under the extreme failure scenario s
Figure FDA0002330870910000097
The microgrid power exchange constraint is the same as the operation mode in the normal operation scene, and represents the period of extreme fault occurrence
Figure FDA0002330870910000098
Because of the fault of the upper-level power grid, all the micro-grids are converted into isolated island operation after being interconnected, and the load on the feeder line of the power distribution network is recovered when the surplus power still exists on the premise of ensuring the power supply of the key load in the interconnected micro-grids,
Figure FDA0002330870910000099
the method comprises the steps of obtaining power distribution network feeder key load power recovered by a microgrid i within a time period t under a scene s;
the load shedding power constraint is as follows:
Figure FDA00023308709100000910
the upper and lower limits of each level of load shedding power are constrained under a fault scene s;
the key load recovery power constraint on the feeder line of the power distribution network is as follows:
Figure FDA00023308709100000911
this is a critical load recovery power constraint on the distribution network feeder, P, under extreme fault scenario st LDPower to be recovered for the key load of the power distribution network within the time period t;
the total fuel quantity constraint of the controllable distributed power supply is as follows:
Figure FDA0002330870910000101
this is a total fuel upper limit constraint for a dispatchable distributed power unit in an extreme fault scenario,
Figure FDA0002330870910000102
the method is the upper limit value of the generated energy of the schedulable distributed power supply unit in the microgrid i under the extreme fault scene s.
6. The interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity optimization configuration method of claim 5, wherein the solving of the interconnected microgrid energy storage capacity configuration double-layer optimization model in the step 4 comprises the following steps:
step 4-1: arranging the energy storage capacity configured double-layer optimization model into a single-layer model, which is shown in the following formula;
Figure FDA0002330870910000103
step 4-2: converting nonlinear constraint conditions appearing in the converted single-layer model into linear constraint conditions by a large M method, wherein the linear constraint conditions are shown as the following formula;
Figure FDA0002330870910000104
Figure FDA0002330870910000105
Figure FDA0002330870910000106
Figure FDA0002330870910000107
wherein: m is an arbitrarily large penalty factor, and M > 0;
step 4-3: constructing r, Aineq, bineq, Aeq, beq, lb and ub required by model solving, and calling cplexmill function by using MATLAB to solve X;
wherein Aineq and Aeq refer to coefficient matrixes before variables to be optimized in constraint conditions of objective functions of upper and lower layers of models, bineq and beq refer to constant column vectors on the right side of inequality constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models and constant column vectors on the right side of equal signs of the equality constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively, and lb and ub refer to constant column vectors on the left and right sides of the inequality signs of the variables to be optimized in the constraint conditions of the objective functions of the upper and lower layers of models respectively.
CN201911335704.3A 2019-12-23 2019-12-23 Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method Pending CN111181154A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911335704.3A CN111181154A (en) 2019-12-23 2019-12-23 Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201911335704.3A CN111181154A (en) 2019-12-23 2019-12-23 Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN111181154A true CN111181154A (en) 2020-05-19

Family

ID=70652120

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201911335704.3A Pending CN111181154A (en) 2019-12-23 2019-12-23 Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN111181154A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113708418A (en) * 2021-09-24 2021-11-26 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Micro-grid optimization scheduling method
CN114066048A (en) * 2021-11-15 2022-02-18 国网上海市电力公司 Park comprehensive energy system planning method for improving toughness of power distribution network

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103475013A (en) * 2013-09-27 2013-12-25 清华大学 Method and system for comprehensively optimizing energy storing power station planning and operating
CN104362677A (en) * 2014-11-19 2015-02-18 云南电网公司电力科学研究院 Active distribution network optimal configuration structure and configuration method thereof
CN107203855A (en) * 2017-08-03 2017-09-26 国网江苏省电力公司宿迁供电公司 The robust bi-level optimization model and conversion equivalent method of the Real-Time Scheduling containing wind power system
CN109740827A (en) * 2019-02-14 2019-05-10 华北电力大学 A kind of regional complex energy system planning optimization method based on dual-layer optimization

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103475013A (en) * 2013-09-27 2013-12-25 清华大学 Method and system for comprehensively optimizing energy storing power station planning and operating
CN104362677A (en) * 2014-11-19 2015-02-18 云南电网公司电力科学研究院 Active distribution network optimal configuration structure and configuration method thereof
CN107203855A (en) * 2017-08-03 2017-09-26 国网江苏省电力公司宿迁供电公司 The robust bi-level optimization model and conversion equivalent method of the Real-Time Scheduling containing wind power system
CN109740827A (en) * 2019-02-14 2019-05-10 华北电力大学 A kind of regional complex energy system planning optimization method based on dual-layer optimization

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HUA XIE,XIAOFEI TENG,YIN XU,YING WANG: "optimal energy storage sizing for networked microgrids considering reliability and resilience", 《IEEE》 *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113708418A (en) * 2021-09-24 2021-11-26 国网湖南省电力有限公司 Micro-grid optimization scheduling method
CN114066048A (en) * 2021-11-15 2022-02-18 国网上海市电力公司 Park comprehensive energy system planning method for improving toughness of power distribution network

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Singh et al. Feasibility study of an islanded microgrid in rural area consisting of PV, wind, biomass and battery energy storage system
Maleki et al. Comparative study of artificial intelligence techniques for sizing of a hydrogen-based stand-alone photovoltaic/wind hybrid system
CN109325608A (en) Consider the distributed generation resource Optimal Configuration Method of energy storage and meter and photovoltaic randomness
CN105207259B (en) Micro-grid system dispatching method under based on energy management and net state
CN105139147A (en) Economic scheduling method for micro-grid system
Masrur et al. An optimized and outage-resilient energy management framework for multicarrier energy microgrids integrating demand response
CN110165715B (en) Method for connecting electric vehicle energy storage type charging station into virtual power plant
CN103577891A (en) Multi-island micro-grid optimization cooperation running method containing distributed power source
CN110661301B (en) Capacity allocation optimization method for water-light-storage multi-energy complementary power generation system
CN105207207A (en) Energy-management-based micro-grid system dispatching method in isolated grid state
CN115759361A (en) Traffic energy scheduling method, system, device and medium based on double-layer planning
CN116826736A (en) Flexible resource allocation method and system for high-proportion new energy system inertia constraint
CN111181154A (en) Interconnected micro-grid energy storage capacity optimal configuration method
Tremont-Brito et al. Microgrid Design Toolkit Evaluation and Trade-offs Analysis for Rural Community in Cayey Puerto Rico
Pruckner et al. A study on the impact of packet loss and latency on real-time demand response in smart grid
CN114465226A (en) Method for establishing multi-level standby acquisition joint optimization model of power system
Shayeghi et al. Potentiometric of the renewable hybrid system for electrification of gorgor station
Ochoa-Malhaber et al. Technical-economic comparison of microgrids for rural communities in the island region of Galapagos, Ecuador: Isabela Island case
Rouhani et al. A teaching learning based optimization for optimal design of a hybrid energy system
Mosa et al. Energy management system of autonomous low voltage DC microgrid consists of energy storage system
Anusha et al. Energy Management of an Off-Grid and Grid Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy Source Micro-Grid System for Commercial Load
CN115936336A (en) Virtual power plant capacity configuration and regulation operation optimization method
CN111030191B (en) Cell power grid planning method based on multi-target cooperation and self-optimization operation
Narasimalu et al. Integration of Energy Storage System with Renewable Energy Source
Chen et al. Mathematical programming model for energy system design

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication

Application publication date: 20200519