[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

CN108460619A - A kind of fusion shows the Collaborative Recommendation model of implicit feedback - Google Patents

A kind of fusion shows the Collaborative Recommendation model of implicit feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN108460619A
CN108460619A CN201810038717.3A CN201810038717A CN108460619A CN 108460619 A CN108460619 A CN 108460619A CN 201810038717 A CN201810038717 A CN 201810038717A CN 108460619 A CN108460619 A CN 108460619A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
user
item
recommendation
model
score
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN201810038717.3A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN108460619B (en
Inventor
汤景凡
龚泽鑫
张旻
姜明
杜炼
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wenzhou Kaichen Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Hangzhou Dianzi University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hangzhou Dianzi University filed Critical Hangzhou Dianzi University
Priority to CN201810038717.3A priority Critical patent/CN108460619B/en
Publication of CN108460619A publication Critical patent/CN108460619A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN108460619B publication Critical patent/CN108460619B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • G06Q30/0255Targeted advertisements based on user history
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9535Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisements based on user profile or attribute
    • G06Q30/0271Personalized advertisement

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses the Collaborative Recommendation models that a kind of fusion shows implicit feedback, from the angle of the true shopping process of analog subscriber, our recommendation task is completed by two steps, after being modeled first by the user concealed feedback data of the recommended models of sequencing-oriented analysis, the article selected user and most possibly browsed is concentrated from article to be sorted, then pass through user's explicit feedback data using the recommended models towards scoring, learn user characteristics matrix and article characteristics matrix for predicting scoring, it is then based on scoring and sequencing is rearranged to the article collection selected before, target user is returned to as last recommendation list, to greatly improve the accuracy of recommendation, it is worth with extensive commercial application.

Description

Collaborative recommendation model integrating explicit and implicit feedback
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of computer software, and particularly relates to a collaborative recommendation model integrating explicit-implicit feedback.
Background
In most current online shopping platforms, the historical behavior data (such as rating, praise, browsing history) of the user implicitly contains the preference information of the user, and many recommendation systems use the preference information as one of important sources of input data. According to the feedback mechanism of the user, the online behavior data of the user can be divided into explicit feedback data and implicit feedback data, and the two data are concurrent with the current e-commerce field, and the explicit feedback data or the implicit feedback data rarely independently exist. However, most of the prior personalized recommendation technologies focus on the single explicit feedback or implicit feedback, which is difficult to meet the urgent needs of the current e-commerce for recommendation technologies, and how to fuse the explicit and implicit feedback for recommendation tasks is one of the difficulties of research. In addition, the sequence in the finally generated recommended item set influences the purchasing intention of people, and it is generally considered that the former item is the most desirable item to purchase by the user, so the sequence between different items in the recommendation result should be considered by the recommendation task.
In the present invention, we consider the purchase flow of the user in the real scene as follows: the user browses the commodities for a long time and selects the commodities which the user wants to buy. The user leaves much implicit feedback data (such as clicks, browsing, purchasing records and the like) in the browsing process, and the evaluation information after purchasing is explicit feedback data (such as scores, ratings and the like) of the user, so the final recommendation result should not depend on the explicit feedback data or the implicit feedback data alone, and the recommendation task can be divided into two steps: the method comprises the steps of firstly generating an item set which is most likely to be browsed by a user, and then reordering the obtained item set to generate an item set which is most likely to be purchased by the user.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit-implicit feedback. The model has good recommendation effect and can realize personalized recommendation.
The technical scheme adopted by the invention for solving the technical problem comprises the following steps:
step 1, training a required ranking-oriented recommendation model by using implicit feedback data, and selecting an article set I which is most likely to be browsed by a user;
step 2, adding explicit feedback data and implicit feedback data into the scoring-oriented model to train the model, and learning a user characteristic matrix and an article characteristic matrix for predicting scoring; reordering the item set I obtained in the step 1 to obtain an item set II which is most likely to be purchased by the user, and returning the item set II to the target user as a final recommendation result;
through the steps, the implicit feedback data and the explicit feedback data of the user are used for personalized recommendation, and the purpose of improving the personalized recommendation effect is achieved.
The step 1 is specifically realized as follows:
the recommendation algorithm used by the ranking-oriented recommendation model in step 1 may adopt a more excellent algorithm bpr (bayesian qualified ranking) applied to implicit feedback data in the current ranking learning algorithm, and the algorithm is implemented as follows:
firstly, carrying out data pair preprocessing on historical scoring data of a user: the BPR algorithm processes the user's score data for an item (the item with which the user has interacted is denoted as "1", and the item without interaction is denoted as "0") into a set of pair < i, j >, where i is the item with a score of 1 and j is the item with a score of 0. Expressed in a triplet < u, i, j >: user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j".
Preconditions of the recommendation model:
① the preference behavior between users is independent.
② the order bias relationship of the same user to different items is independent.
Thus, a target is defined that needs maximization:
Πp(Θ|i>uj)∝Πp(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ)(1)
wherein Θ is the recommended model parameter that is sought, including: a user's feature matrix U and an item's feature matrix V. p (Θ | i >)uj) Representing the posterior probability, p (i >)uj | Θ) represents the likelihood part, p (Θ) represents the prior probability, i >uj indicates that user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j".
Wherein with respect to the likelihood part: p (i >)uj|Θ)=δ(xu,i-xu,j),xu,i=pu·piLet the prior probability obey the following distribution: theta to N (0, lambda)ΘI) Then the density function of the prior probability is:
based on the above assumptions, the optimization objective is further expanded to obtain:
Πp(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ)∝ln(p(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ))=∑(lnδ(xu,i-xu,j)+lnp(Θ))
=∑(lnδ(xu,i-xu,j)-λΘ||Θ||2)
=∑(lnδ(xu,i-xu,j)-λΘ||pu||2Θ||qi||2Θ||qj||2)
=∑(lnδ(pu·qi-pu·qj)-λΘ||pu||2Θ||qi||2Θ||qj||2)(3)
wherein xu,i<pu,qi>The preference degree of the user u for the item i is expressed in the form of an inner product of two vectors, and theta is a parameter of the recommendation model. In order to maximize the function value of the above expression (3), it is solved by a random gradient descent algorithm (SGD). The invention can obtain the item set I which is most likely to be browsed by the user through the method.
The step 2 is realized as follows:
for the recommendation model facing the score in step 2, the SVD + + model may be used to complete the screening of the item set ii most likely to be purchased by the user. The SVD + + model is improved by integrating implicit feedback data on the basis of a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) model. The core of SVD is a matrix decomposition technology, and the basic idea is to extract some features according to a user's historical behavior data set (such as user's score data) as the basis of a recommendation task. For movie recommendations, these features can be understood as the degree of fun, the degree of horror, the degree of adventure, etc. of the movie.
In the SVD model, each user has an item that is not scored for which the user may actually have a potential interest, but the SVD incorrectly believes that the user is not interested in the item. The SVD + + model incorporates the fact that the user is potentially interested.
Where N (u) represents the user u scoring item set, and W is called the potential item feature matrix. The objective function is defined as follows:
wherein,vector biRepresenting the deviation of the score of movie i from the mean score, vector buRepresenting the deviation of the score made by user u from the average score, the average score is scored as μ.
The invention has the following beneficial effects:
the invention discloses a collaborative recommendation model integrating explicit-implicit feedback. In the traditional recommendation technology, the rating-oriented recommendation model only utilizes the explicit feedback data of the users, so that the capability of capturing the like similarity between the users is lost, and the ranking-oriented recommendation model only considers whether the preferences of the users to the product pairs are consistent and ignores the important information of the preference degree between the users. The invention analyzes and researches two traditional recommendation models and finds respective defects. Therefore, from the perspective of simulating the real shopping process of the user, the invention combines the advantages of the two recommendation models together by two steps to complete the recommendation task, firstly, the recommendation model facing the sequencing analyzes the implicit feedback data of the user to model, then, the most likely browsed items of the user are selected from the item set to be sequenced, then, the recommendation model facing the grading learns the user characteristic matrix and the item characteristic matrix for predicting the grading through the explicit feedback data of the user, and then, the selected item set is rearranged in the sequence based on the grading and is returned to the target user as the final recommendation list.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The invention is further illustrated by the following figures and examples.
A collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback is shown in the overall framework of fig. 1. The method comprises the following steps:
step 1, training a required ranking-oriented recommendation model (such as BPR) by using implicit feedback data, and selecting an item set I which is most likely to be browsed by a user.
And 2, adding explicit feedback data and implicit feedback data into the rating-oriented model (such as SVD + +) to train the model, reordering the item set I obtained in the step 1 to obtain an item set II which is most likely to be purchased by the user, and taking the item set II as a final recommendation result.
Through the steps, the implicit feedback data and the explicit feedback data of the user are used for personalized recommendation, and the purpose of improving the personalized recommendation effect is achieved.
The step 1 is specifically realized as follows:
the recommendation algorithm used by the ranking-oriented recommendation model in step 1 may adopt a more excellent algorithm bpr (bayesian qualified ranking) applied to implicit feedback data in the current ranking learning algorithm, and the algorithm is implemented as follows:
firstly, carrying out data pair preprocessing on historical scoring data of a user: the BPR algorithm processes the user's score data for an item (the item with which the user has interacted is denoted as "1", and the item without interaction is denoted as "0") into a set of pair < i, j >, where i is the item with a score of 1 and j is the item with a score of 0. Expressed in a triplet < u, i, j >: user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j".
Preconditions of the recommendation model:
① the preference behavior between users is independent.
② the order bias relationship of the same user to different items is independent.
Thus, a target is defined that needs maximization:
Πp(Θ|i>uj)∝Πp(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ)(1)
wherein Θ is the recommended model parameter that is sought, including: a user's feature matrix U and an item's feature matrix V. p (Θ | i >)uj) Representing the posterior probability, p (i >)uj | Θ) represents the likelihood part, p (Θ) represents the prior probability, i >uj indicates that user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j".
Wherein with respect to the likelihood part: p (i >)uj|Θ)=δ(xu,i-xu,j),xu,i=pu·piLet the prior probability obey the following distribution: theta to N (O, lambda)θI) Then the density function of the prior probability is:
based on the above assumptions, the optimization objective is further expanded to obtain:
Πp(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ)∝ln(p(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ))=∑(lnδ(xu,i,xu,j)+ln p(Θ))
=∑(lnδ(xu,i-xu,j)-λΘ||Θ||2)
=∑(lnδ(xu,i-xu,j)-λΘ||pu||2Θ||qi||2Θ||qj||2)
=∑(lnδ(pu·qi-pu·qj)-λΘ||pu||2Θ||qi||2Θ||qj||2)(3)
wherein xu,i<pu,qi>The preference degree of the user u for the item i is expressed in the form of an inner product of two vectors, and theta is a parameter of the recommendation model. In order to maximize the function value of the above expression (3), it is solved by a random gradient descent algorithm (SGD). The invention can obtain the item set I which is most likely to be browsed by the user through the method.
The step 2 is realized as follows:
for the recommendation model facing the score in step 2, the SVD + + model may be used to complete the screening of the item set ii most likely to be purchased by the user. The SVD + + model is improved by integrating implicit feedback data on the basis of a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) model. The core of SVD is a matrix decomposition technology, and the basic idea is to extract some features according to a user's historical behavior data set (such as user's score data) as the basis of a recommendation task. For movie recommendations, these features can be understood as the degree of fun, the degree of horror, the degree of adventure, etc. of the movie.
In the SVD model, each user has an item that is not scored for which the user may actually have a potential interest, but the SVD incorrectly believes that the user is not interested in the item. The SVD + + model incorporates the fact that the user is potentially interested.
Where N (u) represents the user u scoring item set, and W is called the potential item feature matrix. The objective function is defined as follows:
wherein,vector biRepresenting the deviation of the score of movie i from the mean score, vector buRepresenting the deviation of the score made by user u from the average score, the average score is scored as μ.

Claims (2)

1. A collaborative recommendation model integrating explicit-implicit feedback is characterized in that from the perspective of simulating the real shopping process of a user, the collaborative recommendation model comprises the following specific steps:
step 1, training a required ranking-oriented recommendation model by using implicit feedback data, and selecting an article set I which is most likely to be browsed by a user;
step 2, adding explicit feedback data and implicit feedback data into the scoring-oriented model to train the model, and learning a user characteristic matrix and an article characteristic matrix for predicting scoring; reordering the item set I obtained in the step 1 to obtain an item set II which is most likely to be purchased by the user, and returning the item set II to the target user as a final recommendation result;
the recommendation algorithm used by the ranking-oriented recommendation model in the step 1 adopts a BPR algorithm applied to implicit feedback data in the current ranking learning algorithm, and is specifically realized as follows:
firstly, carrying out data pair preprocessing on historical scoring data of a user: the BPR algorithm processes the scoring data of the user to the articles into a set of pair < i, j >, wherein i is the article with the score of 1, and j is the article with the score of 0; expressed in triads < u, i, j >: user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j"; the item with interaction by the user is marked as '1', and the item without interaction is marked as '0';
the preconditions of the ranking-oriented recommendation model are:
① the preference behavior among users is independent;
② the partial order relations of different articles of the same user are independent;
thus, a target is defined that needs maximization:
Πp(Θ|i>uj)∝Πp(i>uj|Θ)p(Θ) (1)
wherein Θ is the recommended model parameter that is sought, including: a characteristic matrix U of the user and a characteristic matrix V of the article; p (Θ | i >)uj) Representing the posterior probability, p (i >)uj | Θ) represents the likelihood part, p (Θ) represents the prior probability, i >uj indicates that user "u" likes item "i" more than item "j";
wherein with respect to the likelihood part: p (i >)uj|Θ)=δ(xu,i-xu,j),xu,i=pu·piLet the prior probability obey the following distribution: theta to N (0, lambda)ΘI) Then the density function of the prior probability is:
based on the above assumptions, the optimization objective is further expanded to obtain:
wherein xu,i<pu,qiThe preference degree of the user u to the item i is expressed in an inner product form of two vectors, and theta is a recommendation model parameter; in order to maximize the function value of the above expression (3), solving by a random gradient descent algorithm, the item set I most likely to be browsed by the user is obtained.
2. The collaborative recommendation model with explicit and implicit feedback fusion as claimed in claim 1, wherein for the recommendation model facing the score in step 2, the SVD + + model is used to complete the screening of the item set II most likely to be purchased by the user, and the SVD + + model incorporates the fact that the user has potential interest;
wherein N (u) represents a user u scoring item set, and W is called a potential item feature matrix; the objective function is defined as follows:
wherein,vector biRepresenting the deviation of the score of movie i from the mean score, vector buRepresenting the deviation of the score made by user u from the average score, the average score is scored as μ.
CN201810038717.3A 2018-01-16 2018-01-16 Method for providing collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback Active CN108460619B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810038717.3A CN108460619B (en) 2018-01-16 2018-01-16 Method for providing collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201810038717.3A CN108460619B (en) 2018-01-16 2018-01-16 Method for providing collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN108460619A true CN108460619A (en) 2018-08-28
CN108460619B CN108460619B (en) 2020-04-21

Family

ID=63220184

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201810038717.3A Active CN108460619B (en) 2018-01-16 2018-01-16 Method for providing collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN108460619B (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109299370A (en) * 2018-10-09 2019-02-01 中国科学技术大学 Multipair grade personalized recommendation method
CN109446430A (en) * 2018-11-29 2019-03-08 西安电子科技大学 Method, apparatus, computer equipment and the readable storage medium storing program for executing of Products Show
CN109885644A (en) * 2019-04-08 2019-06-14 浙江大学城市学院 A kind of importance appraisal procedure for Internet of Things Item Information searching order
CN110020207A (en) * 2019-04-16 2019-07-16 中森云链(成都)科技有限责任公司 A kind of interpretable Top-K recommended method of examination question of fusion aspect implicit feedback
CN110059251A (en) * 2019-04-22 2019-07-26 郑州大学 Collaborative filtering recommending method based on more relationship implicit feedback confidence levels
CN110110139A (en) * 2019-04-19 2019-08-09 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 The method, apparatus and electronic equipment that a kind of pair of recommendation results explain
CN111104601A (en) * 2019-12-26 2020-05-05 河南理工大学 Antagonistic multi-feedback-level paired personalized ranking method
CN111160859A (en) * 2019-12-26 2020-05-15 淮阴工学院 Human resource post recommendation method based on SVD + + and collaborative filtering
CN111241415A (en) * 2019-12-28 2020-06-05 四川文理学院 Recommendation method fusing multi-factor social activity
CN111310029A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-06-19 哈尔滨理工大学 Mixed recommendation method based on user commodity portrait and potential factor feature extraction
CN113010802A (en) * 2021-03-25 2021-06-22 华南理工大学 Recommendation method facing implicit feedback based on multi-attribute interaction of user and article
CN113111251A (en) * 2020-01-10 2021-07-13 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Project recommendation method, device and system
US20210241347A1 (en) * 2020-01-31 2021-08-05 Walmart Apollo, Llc Single-select predictive platform model
CN113538093A (en) * 2021-07-16 2021-10-22 四川大学 High-quality power package recommendation method based on improved collaborative filtering algorithm
CN114662010A (en) * 2022-03-16 2022-06-24 重庆邮电大学 Explicit-implicit collaborative filtering recommendation method based on multitask learning
US11861676B2 (en) 2020-01-31 2024-01-02 Walmart Apollo, Llc Automatic item grouping and personalized department layout for reorder recommendations

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104281956A (en) * 2014-10-27 2015-01-14 南京信息工程大学 Dynamic recommendation method capable of adapting to user interest changes based on time information
US20150187024A1 (en) * 2013-12-27 2015-07-02 Telefonica Digital España, S.L.U. System and Method for Socially Aware Recommendations Based on Implicit User Feedback
CN107423335A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-12-01 电子科技大学 A kind of negative sample system of selection for single class collaborative filtering problem

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150187024A1 (en) * 2013-12-27 2015-07-02 Telefonica Digital España, S.L.U. System and Method for Socially Aware Recommendations Based on Implicit User Feedback
CN104281956A (en) * 2014-10-27 2015-01-14 南京信息工程大学 Dynamic recommendation method capable of adapting to user interest changes based on time information
CN107423335A (en) * 2017-04-27 2017-12-01 电子科技大学 A kind of negative sample system of selection for single class collaborative filtering problem

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109299370B (en) * 2018-10-09 2022-03-01 中国科学技术大学 Multi-pair level personalized recommendation method
CN109299370A (en) * 2018-10-09 2019-02-01 中国科学技术大学 Multipair grade personalized recommendation method
CN109446430A (en) * 2018-11-29 2019-03-08 西安电子科技大学 Method, apparatus, computer equipment and the readable storage medium storing program for executing of Products Show
CN109885644B (en) * 2019-04-08 2021-04-06 浙江大学城市学院 Importance evaluation method for searching and sorting of Internet of things item information
CN109885644A (en) * 2019-04-08 2019-06-14 浙江大学城市学院 A kind of importance appraisal procedure for Internet of Things Item Information searching order
CN110020207A (en) * 2019-04-16 2019-07-16 中森云链(成都)科技有限责任公司 A kind of interpretable Top-K recommended method of examination question of fusion aspect implicit feedback
CN110110139A (en) * 2019-04-19 2019-08-09 北京奇艺世纪科技有限公司 The method, apparatus and electronic equipment that a kind of pair of recommendation results explain
CN110059251A (en) * 2019-04-22 2019-07-26 郑州大学 Collaborative filtering recommending method based on more relationship implicit feedback confidence levels
CN110059251B (en) * 2019-04-22 2022-10-28 郑州大学 Collaborative filtering recommendation method based on multi-relation implicit feedback confidence
CN111104601A (en) * 2019-12-26 2020-05-05 河南理工大学 Antagonistic multi-feedback-level paired personalized ranking method
CN111160859A (en) * 2019-12-26 2020-05-15 淮阴工学院 Human resource post recommendation method based on SVD + + and collaborative filtering
CN111104601B (en) * 2019-12-26 2022-09-13 河南理工大学 Antagonistic multi-feedback-level paired personalized ranking method
CN111241415B (en) * 2019-12-28 2023-07-21 四川文理学院 Recommendation method integrating multi-factor social activities
CN111241415A (en) * 2019-12-28 2020-06-05 四川文理学院 Recommendation method fusing multi-factor social activity
CN113111251A (en) * 2020-01-10 2021-07-13 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Project recommendation method, device and system
CN111310029B (en) * 2020-01-20 2022-11-01 哈尔滨理工大学 Mixed recommendation method based on user commodity portrait and potential factor feature extraction
CN111310029A (en) * 2020-01-20 2020-06-19 哈尔滨理工大学 Mixed recommendation method based on user commodity portrait and potential factor feature extraction
US20210241347A1 (en) * 2020-01-31 2021-08-05 Walmart Apollo, Llc Single-select predictive platform model
US11636525B2 (en) * 2020-01-31 2023-04-25 Walmart Apollo, Llc Single-select predictive platform model
US11861676B2 (en) 2020-01-31 2024-01-02 Walmart Apollo, Llc Automatic item grouping and personalized department layout for reorder recommendations
CN113010802B (en) * 2021-03-25 2022-09-20 华南理工大学 Recommendation method facing implicit feedback based on multi-attribute interaction of user and article
CN113010802A (en) * 2021-03-25 2021-06-22 华南理工大学 Recommendation method facing implicit feedback based on multi-attribute interaction of user and article
CN113538093A (en) * 2021-07-16 2021-10-22 四川大学 High-quality power package recommendation method based on improved collaborative filtering algorithm
CN114662010A (en) * 2022-03-16 2022-06-24 重庆邮电大学 Explicit-implicit collaborative filtering recommendation method based on multitask learning

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN108460619B (en) 2020-04-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108460619B (en) Method for providing collaborative recommendation model fusing explicit and implicit feedback
CN106682114B (en) Personalized recommendation method integrating user trust relationship and comment information
CN111428147A (en) Social recommendation method of heterogeneous graph volume network combining social and interest information
CN111222054A (en) Session social contact recommendation method based on context neighbor relation modeling
CN109241366B (en) Hybrid recommendation system and method based on multitask deep learning
CN105787100A (en) User session recommendation method based on deep neural network
CN108984523A (en) A kind of comment on commodity sentiment analysis method based on deep learning model
CN111428127B (en) Personalized event recommendation method and system integrating theme matching and bidirectional preference
CN105809474B (en) Hierarchical commodity information filtering recommendation method
CN111681084B (en) E-commerce platform recommendation method based on social relationship influence factors
CN111881363A (en) Recommendation method based on graph interaction network
CN105761154B (en) A kind of socialization recommended method and device
CN103996143A (en) Movie marking prediction method based on implicit bias and interest of friends
CN107944911A (en) A kind of recommendation method of the commending system based on text analyzing
CN113641811B (en) Session recommendation method, system, equipment and storage medium for promoting purchasing behavior
CN110795640A (en) Adaptive group recommendation method for compensating group member difference
CN112819575B (en) Session recommendation method considering repeated purchasing behavior
CN111967946B (en) Commodity recommendation method and system based on user-oriented multi-relation information network
CN104572915B (en) One kind is based on the enhanced customer incident relatedness computation method of content environment
CN113190751A (en) Recommendation algorithm for generating fused keywords
CN112085158A (en) Book recommendation method based on stack noise reduction self-encoder
CN111949894B (en) Collaborative filtering personalized recommendation method based on multi-space interaction
CN109800424A (en) It is a kind of based on improving matrix decomposition and the recommended method across channel convolutional neural networks
WO2024061073A1 (en) Multimedia information generation method and apparatus, and computer-readable storage medium
CN110570226B (en) Scoring prediction method combining topic model and heterogeneous information network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract
EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract

Application publication date: 20180828

Assignee: Wenzhou Kaichen Technology Co.,Ltd.

Assignor: HANGZHOU DIANZI University

Contract record no.: X2021330000778

Denomination of invention: A method of providing collaborative recommendation model integrating explicit and implicit feedback

Granted publication date: 20200421

License type: Common License

Record date: 20211130

TR01 Transfer of patent right
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20221206

Address after: 325036 Room 301, Floor 3, Building 10, Incubator of Wenzhou National University Science Park, No. 38, Dongfang South Road, Ouhai Economic Development Zone, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang Province

Patentee after: Wenzhou Kaichen Technology Co.,Ltd.

Address before: 310018 No. 2 street, Xiasha Higher Education Zone, Hangzhou, Zhejiang

Patentee before: HANGZHOU DIANZI University