[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

CN107104420B - I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access - Google Patents

I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN107104420B
CN107104420B CN201710381594.9A CN201710381594A CN107104420B CN 107104420 B CN107104420 B CN 107104420B CN 201710381594 A CN201710381594 A CN 201710381594A CN 107104420 B CN107104420 B CN 107104420B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fault
distance
protection
line
upfc
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201710381594.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN107104420A (en
Inventor
郑涛
王可坛
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
North China Electric Power University
Original Assignee
North China Electric Power University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by North China Electric Power University filed Critical North China Electric Power University
Priority to CN201710381594.9A priority Critical patent/CN107104420B/en
Publication of CN107104420A publication Critical patent/CN107104420A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN107104420B publication Critical patent/CN107104420B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H02GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02HEMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
    • H02H7/00Emergency protective circuit arrangements specially adapted for specific types of electric machines or apparatus or for sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, and effecting automatic switching in the event of an undesired change from normal working conditions
    • H02H7/26Sectionalised protection of cable or line systems, e.g. for disconnecting a section on which a short-circuit, earth fault, or arc discharge has occured
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/081Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors
    • G01R31/085Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks according to type of conductors in power transmission or distribution lines, e.g. overhead
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
    • G01R31/08Locating faults in cables, transmission lines, or networks
    • G01R31/088Aspects of digital computing

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)

Abstract

本发明属于电力系统线路继电保护领域,尤其涉及一种适用于统一潮流控制器接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法。本发明利用故障后系统电压电流相量几何特性构建虚拟相似三角形,并据此构造新型故障距离求解方程精确求解故障距离,再结合故障测距波动性辅助判据正确区分区内外故障。该方法不受过渡电阻的影响,仅利用单端电气量信息即可对故障位置精确定位,并可结合辅助判据可靠区分区内外故障。此外,该方法适用于各种故障类型和各种动作特性的距离元件,具有良好的普适性且不受UPFC运行方式的影响,为含有UPFC线路的继电保护设计和研发提供了坚实的理论计算基础。

The invention belongs to the field of relay protection of power system lines, in particular to a line distance section I protection method suitable for unified power flow controller access. The invention utilizes the geometric characteristics of the voltage and current phasors of the system after a fault to construct a virtual similar triangle, and constructs a new fault distance solution equation based on this to accurately solve the fault distance, and then combines the fault distance measurement volatility auxiliary criterion to correctly distinguish internal and external faults. This method is not affected by the transition resistance, and the fault location can be accurately located only by using the single-end electrical quantity information, and the fault inside and outside the zone can be reliably distinguished in combination with auxiliary criteria. In addition, this method is suitable for distance elements of various fault types and various operating characteristics, has good universality and is not affected by the operation mode of UPFC, and provides a solid theory for the design and development of relay protection with UPFC lines Calculation basis.

Description

适用于统一潮流控制器接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法Protection method for section Ⅰ of line distance suitable for unified power flow controller access

技术领域technical field

本发明属于电力系统线路继电保护领域,尤其涉及一种适用于统一潮流控制器接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法。The invention belongs to the field of relay protection of power system lines, in particular to a line distance section I protection method suitable for unified power flow controller access.

背景技术Background technique

随着我国经济的飞速发展,现代电力系统已逐步成为现代工业中规模最大、层次最复杂、一体化程度最高的巨维数非线性实体系统。与此同时,现代电力系统也正面临着系统规划与资源优化配置、安全稳定运行等问题。为解决这些难题,灵活交流输电系统(FACTS)应运而生,其综合了现代电力电子技术、自动控制技术和计算机技术,可实现对电力系统更安全、更稳定、更高效、更灵活的控制。UPFC(统一潮流控制器)作为第三代FACTS原件,可同时实现串联补偿和并联补偿,具有传统FACTS装置不可比拟的优势。理论分析和工程实例表明,UPFC可对电压、相角、阻抗进而对系统潮流实现快速频繁的调节控制,显著提高线路输送能力和系统稳定水平阻尼系统振荡,因此国内外专家学者对其进行了大量研究,主要包括:物理模型,电磁暂态仿真,系统震荡及控制策略等。然而UPFC在提高系统性能的同时也改变了阻抗、电压、相角等作为继电保护判据的电气量,进而威胁到继电保护装置的可靠动作,尤其对距离保护的影响最为严重:有文献对基于UPFC的传输线路阻抗进行了详细的分析,指出不同安装位置对保护动作边界有很大的影响,并认为UPFC会使系统暂态过程复杂化,从理论上详细分析了UPFC对距离保护的影响,提出了基于数字仿真确定类似于人工神经网络(ANN)的整定边界;此外有学者详细分析了双回线中UPFC造成的距离保护误动案例,并提出了针对该问题的自适应距离保护方法。由于UPFC可运行于多种工况且不同工况下运行参数差异较大,因此基于ANN的自适应距离保护需要进行大量的测试和学习,而其他距离保护方法需要系统两端严格的对时处理,对通信系统有较高的要求,因此不便于实施。所以,亟需一种新的距离保护算法以解决含UPFC线路经过渡电阻故障时的故障距离精确计算的问题。With the rapid development of our country's economy, the modern power system has gradually become the largest, most complex and highly integrated giant-dimensional nonlinear entity system in modern industry. At the same time, modern power systems are also facing issues such as system planning, resource optimization allocation, and safe and stable operation. In order to solve these problems, the Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) came into being, which integrates modern power electronics technology, automatic control technology and computer technology to achieve safer, more stable, more efficient and more flexible control of the power system. UPFC (Unified Power Flow Controller), as the third-generation FACTS original, can realize series compensation and parallel compensation at the same time, and has incomparable advantages over traditional FACTS devices. Theoretical analysis and engineering examples show that UPFC can realize rapid and frequent adjustment and control of voltage, phase angle, impedance and system power flow, significantly improve line transmission capacity and system stability level, and damp system oscillation. Therefore, domestic and foreign experts and scholars have conducted a lot of research on it. Research mainly includes: physical model, electromagnetic transient simulation, system oscillation and control strategy, etc. However, while UPFC improves the system performance, it also changes the electrical quantities such as impedance, voltage, and phase angle as relay protection criteria, which threatens the reliable operation of relay protection devices, especially the most serious impact on distance protection: there are literatures The impedance of the transmission line based on UPFC is analyzed in detail, pointing out that different installation positions have a great influence on the protection action boundary, and it is believed that UPFC will complicate the transient process of the system, and the effect of UPFC on distance protection is theoretically analyzed in detail Influenced by the influence, it is proposed to determine the setting boundary similar to artificial neural network (ANN) based on digital simulation; in addition, some scholars have analyzed in detail the case of distance protection misoperation caused by UPFC in double circuit lines, and proposed an adaptive distance protection for this problem method. Since UPFC can operate in a variety of working conditions and the operating parameters vary greatly under different working conditions, ANN-based adaptive distance protection requires a lot of testing and learning, while other distance protection methods require strict time synchronization at both ends of the system. There are high requirements on the communication system, so it is not easy to implement. Therefore, a new distance protection algorithm is urgently needed to solve the problem of accurate calculation of the fault distance when the UPFC line passes through the transition resistance fault.

发明内容Contents of the invention

本发明的目的在于克服现有技术的不足,针对过渡电阻和UPFC的接入对线路距离保护的影响,提出了一种适用于统一潮流控制器接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法,利用故障后系统电压电流几何特性构建相似三角形并据此构造故障距离求解方程,精确求解故障距离的同时结合故障测距波动性辅助判据正确区分区内外故障。The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the deficiencies of the prior art, aiming at the impact of transition resistance and UPFC access on line distance protection, a line distance section I protection method suitable for unified power flow controller access is proposed. The geometric characteristics of the voltage and current of the system construct similar triangles and construct the fault distance solution equation based on this, and accurately solve the fault distance while combining the fault distance measurement volatility auxiliary criterion to correctly distinguish internal and external faults.

本发明的技术方法如下所述:Technical method of the present invention is as follows:

一种适用于统一潮流控制器接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法,包括以下步骤:A line distance section I protection method suitable for unified power flow controller access, comprising the following steps:

步骤1:构建故障测距方程;根据简化系统分析图,以故障后电压电流相量图为基础构造相似三角形;根据相似三角形的对应边比值相等原则构造故障距离百分比求解公式,通过逐步搜索法对故障距离百分比P进行求解;Step 1: Construct the fault distance measurement equation; according to the simplified system analysis diagram, construct a similar triangle based on the post-fault voltage and current phasor diagram; construct the fault distance percentage solution formula according to the principle that the corresponding side ratios of similar triangles are equal, and use the step-by-step search method to Calculate the fault distance percentage P;

步骤2:故障判据求解;根据步骤一构建的故障距离求解公式求解故障测距均值pm及故障测距方差D(p);Step 2: Solve the fault criterion; solve the fault distance mean p m and fault distance variance D(p) according to the fault distance solution formula constructed in step 1;

步骤3:判断动作条件;判断步骤二所述故障测距均值pm其故障测距方差D(p)的计算结果是否满足距离保护动作条件。Step 3: Judging the action condition; judging whether the calculation result of the fault ranging mean p m and the fault ranging variance D(p) in step 2 satisfies the distance protection operating condition.

所述故障距离百分比求解公式如下:The formula for solving the fault distance percentage is as follows:

式中:为线路末端保护安装处测量电压,为线路末端保护安装处测量电流,为故障线路正序阻抗角,ZL为线路全长正序阻抗,p为故障距离百分比,即保护安装处至故障点间线路长度与线路全长的比值;In the formula: Voltage measurement for end-of-line protection installations, For current measurement at end-of-line protection installations, is the positive-sequence impedance angle of the fault line, Z L is the positive-sequence impedance of the full length of the line, and p is the percentage of the fault distance, that is, the ratio of the length of the line between the protection installation point and the fault point to the total length of the line;

当系统为单相接地短路故障时:When the system is a single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault:

式中,为线路末端保护安装处测量电压,为线路末端保护安装处测量电流,为单相接地短路故障线路的相电压,为单相接地短路故障线路的相电流, 为系统零序电流,中间变量Z1为线路正序阻抗,Z0为线路零序阻抗;In the formula, Voltage measurement for end-of-line protection installations, For current measurement at end-of-line protection installations, is the phase voltage of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the phase current of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the zero-sequence current of the system, the intermediate variable Z 1 is the line positive sequence impedance, Z 0 is the line zero sequence impedance;

当系统为相间短路故障时:When the system is a phase-to-phase short circuit fault:

式中,为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、为线路末端保护安装处测量电流,为相间短路故障线路的线电压,为相间短路故障线路的线电流, In the formula, Measure voltage at installations for end-of-line protection, For current measurement at end-of-line protection installations, is the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line voltage, is the line current of the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line,

所述故障测距均值pm及故障测距方差D(p)的求解方法如下:确定采样频率,以全周傅氏算法求解第二周波内采样信号的基波分量,根据故障距离求解公式计算各点对应的故障测距均值pm及故障测距方差D(p),构成辅助判据。The solution method of described fault ranging mean value p m and fault ranging variance D(p) is as follows: determine the sampling frequency, solve the fundamental wave component of the sampling signal in the second cycle with the full-cycle Fourier algorithm, and calculate according to the fault distance solution formula The mean value p m of fault distance measurement and the variance D(p) of fault distance measurement corresponding to each point constitute the auxiliary criterion.

所述步骤3具体如下:The step 3 is specifically as follows:

步骤301:将pm及D(p)带入,判断是否满足距离保护动作条件:Step 301: Enter p m and D(p) to determine whether the distance protection action condition is satisfied:

式中pm≤pset为距离保护动作方程;D(p)<0.1为区分故障范围是否包含UPFC的辅助判据;pm为故障测距均值;pset为传统距离保护Ⅰ段整定值,其中ZL为线路全长正序阻抗;D(p)为故障测距方差;In the formula, p m ≤ p set is the distance protection action equation; D(p) < 0.1 is the auxiliary criterion for distinguishing whether the fault range includes UPFC; p m is the average value of fault distance measurement; p set is the setting value of the traditional distance protection section I, in Z L is the full length positive sequence impedance of the line; D(p) is the fault distance measurement variance;

步骤302:当pm、D(p)均满足距离保护动作条件时,判定为保护范围内故障,UPFC的对侧距离Ⅰ段保护跳闸。Step 302: When both p m and D(p) meet the operating conditions of the distance protection, it is determined that there is a fault within the protection range, and the protection of the distance section I on the opposite side of the UPFC trips.

本发明的有益效果在于:The beneficial effects of the present invention are:

本发明的距离保护Ⅰ段不受过渡电阻和UPFC的影响,仅利用单端电气量信息即可对故障位置精确定位,并可根据故障距离计算结果的波动性可靠区分区内外故障。此外,本发明适用于各种故障类型和各种动作特性的距离元件,且不受UPFC运行方式的影响,具有良好的普适性,计算简单可靠,有一定的实际工程意义。The distance protection section I of the present invention is not affected by the transition resistance and UPFC, can accurately locate the fault location only by using single-end electrical quantity information, and can reliably distinguish internal and external faults according to the fluctuation of the fault distance calculation result. In addition, the invention is applicable to distance elements of various fault types and various action characteristics, and is not affected by the operation mode of UPFC, has good universality, simple and reliable calculation, and has certain practical engineering significance.

附图说明Description of drawings

附图1为UPFC接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法流程图;Accompanying drawing 1 is the flow chart of the line distance section I protection method of UPFC access;

附图2为含UPFC系统示意图;Accompanying drawing 2 is the schematic diagram that contains UPFC system;

附图3为UPFC简化模型及故障位置示意图;Accompanying drawing 3 is the schematic diagram of UPFC simplified model and fault location;

附图4含UPFC线路故障后系统正序网络图;Accompanying drawing 4 contains the positive sequence network diagram of the system after the UPFC line failure;

附图5含UPFC线路故障后系统负序网络图;Accompanying drawing 5 contains the negative sequence network diagram of the system after the UPFC line fault;

附图6含UPFC线路故障后系统零序网络图;Accompanying drawing 6 contains the zero-sequence network diagram of the system after the UPFC line fault;

附图7 F1处故障时系统电压电流相量图;Figure 7 is the system voltage and current phasor diagram when fault occurs at F1;

附图8 F2处故障时系统电压电流相量图;Figure 8 is the system voltage and current phasor diagram when fault occurs at F2;

附图9Rg=30Ω时故障距离计算结果图;Attached figure 9 is the calculation result diagram of fault distance when Rg=30Ω;

附图10Rg=60Ω时故障距离计算结果图;Accompanying drawing 10 is the fault distance calculation result diagram when Rg=60Ω;

附图11Rg=100Ω时故障距离计算结果图;Attached Figure 11 is the fault distance calculation result diagram when Rg=100Ω;

附图12 F2点故障时故障距离计算结果图;Accompanying drawing 12 is the calculation result diagram of the fault distance when the F2 point is faulted;

具体实施方式Detailed ways

该方法的主要思想是利用故障后系统电压电流相量几何特性构建虚拟相似三角形,并据此构造新型故障距离求解方程精确求解故障距离,再结合故障测距波动性辅助判据正确区分区内外故障。下面结合附图和实施例对本发明进行详细说明。附图1为UPFC接入的线路距离Ⅰ段保护方法流程图,如图1所示,首先构建故障测距方程,根据简化系统分析图,以故障后电压电流相量图为基础构造相似三角形;根据相似三角形的对应边比值相等原则构造故障距离百分比求解公式,通过逐步搜索法对故障距离百分比进行求解;其次求解故障判据,根据步骤一构建的故障距离求解公式求解故障距离百分比的均值pm及故障距离百分比的方差D(p);最后判断动作条件,判断故障距离百分比均值pm其方差D(p)的计算结果是否满足距离保护动作条件:若pm与D(p)均满足距离保护动作条件,则判定为在保护范围内故障,UPFC的对侧距离Ⅰ段保护跳闸,否则直接退出,判断结束。The main idea of this method is to construct a virtual similar triangle using the geometric characteristics of the voltage and current phasors of the system after a fault, and construct a new fault distance solution equation to accurately solve the fault distance, and then combine the fault distance measurement volatility auxiliary criterion to correctly distinguish internal and external faults . The present invention will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments. Accompanying drawing 1 is the flow chart of the protection method of line distance I section connected by UPFC. As shown in Fig. 1, the fault distance measurement equation is constructed first, and similar triangles are constructed based on the post-fault voltage and current phasor diagram according to the simplified system analysis diagram; According to the principle that the ratios of corresponding sides of similar triangles are equal, the fault distance percentage solution formula is constructed, and the fault distance percentage is solved by a step-by-step search method; secondly, the fault criterion is solved, and the fault distance percentage mean value p m is calculated according to the fault distance solution formula constructed in step 1 And the variance D(p) of the fault distance percentage; finally judge the action condition, and judge whether the calculation result of the fault distance percentage mean p m and its variance D(p) satisfies the distance protection action condition: If both p m and D(p) meet the distance protection action conditions, it is judged to be a fault within the protection range, and the UPFC’s opposite distance section I protection trips, otherwise it exits directly and the judgment ends.

进一步的,在构建故障测距方程过程中,具体方法如下所述:首先将如图2所示的含UPFC系统示意图进行简化,简化后的模型及故障位置如图3所示,在图3中F1点发生短路故障,M侧为线路末端,UPFC由线路始端N侧接入。由于UPFC串并联换流变压器分别采用Y-Y和Y-Δ接线方式,且两种接线方式均网侧不接地,因此故障后系统零序电流不流经UPFC本体装置,即不会改变故障后系统的零序网络结构。据此根据图3所示的含UPFC线路简化示意图,绘制故障后系统正负零三序网络图,如图4-图6所示,附图4-附图6分别为UPFC线路故障后系统正序网络图、负序网络图和零序网络图,由图4-图6可知,UPFC的接入在零序网络中仅引入了串联换流变压器零序漏抗,而无零序电势接入,进而维持网络结构不变;然而在正负序网络中分别由串联换流变压器引入正序电势和负序电势改变了序网结构,通常在三级控制系统调节作用下,稳态运行时UPFC可依据系统需求多模式运行,以达到调度级控制目标。由UPFC控制理论可知,UPFC出力及控制系统参数为系统相角差、频率、电压、电流等电气量,系统故障势必会改变上述电气量,并破坏正常运行时的功率、电压平衡,UPFC控制系统能否实现原控制目标并恢复原平衡状态难以预知,即使恢复原平衡或建立新的平衡也需要一个动态的调节过程,期间UPFC串联分支出力会在控制系统调节作用下时刻变化,因此会对距离保护方法造成很大的影响。为此本发明根据图3对含UPFC线路故障分析模型进行故障分析:Further, in the process of constructing the fault location equation, the specific method is as follows: firstly, the schematic diagram of the system containing UPFC as shown in Figure 2 is simplified, and the simplified model and fault location are shown in Figure 3, and in Figure 3 A short-circuit fault occurs at point F1, the M side is the end of the line, and the UPFC is connected to the N side at the beginning of the line. Since the UPFC series-parallel converter transformer adopts the YY and Y-Δ wiring modes respectively, and the grid side of the two wiring modes is not grounded, the system zero-sequence current does not flow through the UPFC body device after the fault, that is, it will not change the system after the fault. Zero sequence network structure. Based on this, according to the simplified schematic diagram containing UPFC lines shown in Figure 3, the positive, negative, and zero three-sequence network diagrams of the system after the fault are drawn, as shown in Figures 4-6, and Figures 4-6 respectively show the positive and negative phases of the system after the UPFC line fault. Sequence network diagram, negative sequence network diagram and zero-sequence network diagram, it can be seen from Figure 4-6 that the connection of UPFC only introduces the zero-sequence leakage reactance of the series converter transformer in the zero-sequence network, but no zero-sequence potential connection , and then keep the network structure unchanged; however, in the positive and negative sequence networks, the positive sequence potential is introduced by the series converter transformer respectively and negative sequence potential The sequence network structure is changed, usually under the regulation of the three-level control system, the UPFC can operate in multiple modes according to the system requirements during steady-state operation, so as to achieve the control goal of the dispatching level. It can be known from UPFC control theory that UPFC output and control system parameters are electrical quantities such as system phase angle difference, frequency, voltage, and current. System failure will inevitably change the above electrical quantities and destroy the balance of power and voltage during normal operation. UPFC control system It is difficult to predict whether the original control target can be achieved and the original balance state can be restored. Even if the original balance is restored or a new balance is established, a dynamic adjustment process is required. Conservation methods make a big difference. For this reason the present invention carries out fault analysis to containing UPFC line fault analysis model according to Fig. 3:

从线路M侧观察,当故障位于图3中F1等不包含UPFC的位置时,则线路末端M侧保护安装处测量电压表达式如下:Viewed from the M side of the line, when the fault is located at a position that does not include UPFC, such as F1 in Figure 3, the expression of the measured voltage at the protection installation on the M side of the line end is as follows:

式中,Z为保护安装处至故障点间的线路正序阻抗;分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为故障点电压;In the formula, Z is the positive sequence impedance of the line between the protection installation point and the fault point; Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively; is the fault point voltage;

当系统为单相接地短路故障时:When the system is a single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault:

式中Z1、Z0分别为线路正序、零序阻抗;分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为单相接地短路故障线路的相电压,为单相接地短路故障线路的相电流, 为系统零序电流;In the formula Z 1 and Z 0 are positive sequence and zero sequence impedance of the line respectively; Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively; is the phase voltage of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the phase current of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the zero-sequence current of the system;

当系统为相间短路故障时:When the system is a phase-to-phase short circuit fault:

式中,分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为相间短路故障线路的线电压,为相间短路故障线路的线电流, In the formula, Measure the voltage and measure the current at the protective installation at the end of the line respectively; is the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line voltage, is the line current of the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line,

根据上述所示故障后电压电流关系,以故障后故障支路电流为参考相量绘制故障后系统保护安装处测量电流测量电压故障点电压故障支路电流保护安装处至故障点间线路电圧相量图;附图7为F1处故障时系统电压电流相量图,如图7所示,延长交于点B,该图中为已知量,而图中诸如故障点电压保护安装处至故障点间线路电压等未知量均由故障距离百分比表示,所述故障距离百分比即保护安装处至故障点间线路正序阻抗与线路全长正序阻抗的比值,因此建立故障距离百分比方程,进而求解未知量。根据图7所示的相量图,在图中根据电压电流几何特性再添加辅助线构成相似三角形ΔOCD与ΔMAD,并求解相似三角形的各边角,由于ΔOCD~ΔMAD,利用相似三角形对应边比值相等可知将式中各量表达式带入即可构造故障距离百分比求解公式:According to the relationship between the voltage and current after the fault shown above, the fault branch current after the fault is Measured currents at post-fault system protection installations for reference phasor plotting Measuring voltage fault point voltage fault branch current Line voltage between protection installation place and fault point Phasor diagram; Accompanying drawing 7 is the system voltage and current phasor diagram when fault occurs at F1, as shown in Fig. 7, extending and Intersect at point B, in the figure is a known quantity, and in the figure such as the fault point voltage Protect the line voltage between the installation place and the fault point The unknown quantities are represented by the percentage of fault distance, which is the ratio of the positive sequence impedance of the line between the protection installation point and the fault point to the positive sequence impedance of the full length of the line. Therefore, the fault distance percentage equation is established to solve the unknown quantity. According to the phasor diagram shown in Figure 7, add auxiliary lines in the figure according to the geometric characteristics of voltage and current to form similar triangles ΔOCD and ΔMAD, and solve the angles of the similar triangles. Since ΔOCD~ΔMAD, use the ratio of the corresponding sides of the similar triangle It can be seen The formula for solving the percentage of fault distance can be constructed by bringing in the expressions of various quantities in the formula:

式中,分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为故障线路正序阻抗角,ZL为线路全长正序阻抗,p为故障距离百分比即保护安装处至故障点间线路长度与线路全长的比值。In the formula, Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively; is the positive-sequence impedance angle of the fault line, Z L is the positive-sequence impedance of the full length of the line, and p is the percentage of fault distance, which is the ratio of the length of the line between the protection installation point and the fault point to the total length of the line.

当系统为单相接地短路故障时:式中Z1、Z0分别为线路正序、零序阻抗,分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为单相接地短路故障线路的相电压,为单相接地短路故障线路的相电流, 为系统零序电流;当系统为相间短路故障时,式中分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流;为相间短路故障线路的线电压,为相间短路故障线路的线电流,f(p)中仅一个未知量即故障距离百分比p,令f(p)=0求解即可。由于f(p)=0为非线性方程,因此可通过逐步搜索法进行求解。When the system is a single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault: In the formula Z 1 and Z 0 are the positive sequence and zero sequence impedances of the line respectively, Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively; is the phase voltage of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the phase current of the single-phase-to-ground short-circuit fault line, is the zero-sequence current of the system; when the system is short-circuited between phases, In the formula Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively; is the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line voltage, is the line current of the phase-to-phase short-circuit fault line, There is only one unknown quantity in f(p), that is, the fault distance percentage p, and it is sufficient to set f(p)=0 to solve it. Since f(p)=0 is a nonlinear equation, it can be solved by stepwise search method.

进一步的,在求解故障判据过程中,具体方法如下所述:如图3所示的UPFC简化模型及故障位置示意图,当故障位于图3中F2等包含UPFC的位置时,UPFC串联分支在线路中接入一个时变的电势此时线路末端保护安装处测量电压表达式如下:Further, in the process of solving the fault criterion, the specific method is as follows: the simplified model of UPFC and the schematic diagram of the fault location shown in Figure 3, when the fault is located in the position including UPFC such as F2 in Figure 3, the UPFC series branch is on the line A time-varying potential is inserted into the At this time, the measured voltage expression at the line end protection installation is as follows:

式中ZT为串联变压器漏抗,ZL为,为UPFC串联分支补偿电压,分别为线路末端保护安装处测量电压、测量电流,为故障点电压;Where Z T is the leakage reactance of the series transformer, Z L is, is the compensation voltage for the UPFC series branch, Measure the voltage and current at the line end protection installation respectively, is the fault point voltage;

F2处故障时系统电压电流相量关系如图8所示,由图8可以看出,UPFC的接入破坏了ΔOC′D~ΔM′A′D′的几何关系,因此该方法所得的故障测距不能正确反映故障距离,并且会有较大的波动。然而故障发生在不包含UPFC的位置时,测距稳定,波动较小,据此可利用测距波动性大小构成辅助判据以区分区内外故障。综上所述即可得到含UPFC线路故障后UPFC的对侧距离保护判据:首先确定采样频率,以全周傅氏算法求解第二周波内采样信号的基波分量,根据故障距离求解公式计算各点对应的故障距离百分比均值pm及方差D(p),以构成辅助判据。Figure 8 shows the phasor relationship of system voltage and current when F2 is faulty. It can be seen from Figure 8 that the connection of UPFC destroys the geometric relationship between ΔOC′D~ΔM′A′D′, so the fault measurement obtained by this method The distance cannot reflect the fault distance correctly, and there will be large fluctuations. However, when the fault occurs in a location that does not contain UPFC, the ranging is stable and the fluctuation is small. Therefore, the magnitude of the ranging fluctuation can be used to form an auxiliary criterion to distinguish internal and external faults. In summary, the opposite side distance protection criterion of UPFC after the UPFC line fault can be obtained: firstly, the sampling frequency is determined, and the fundamental wave component of the sampling signal in the second cycle is solved by the full-cycle Fourier algorithm, and calculated according to the fault distance solution formula The fault distance percentage mean p m and variance D(p) corresponding to each point constitute the auxiliary criterion.

进一步的,在判断动作条件过程中,具体方法如下所述:将pm及D(p)带入距离保护动作方程判断是否满足距离保护动作条件:Further, in the process of judging the action conditions, the specific method is as follows: put p m and D(p) into the distance protection action equation to judge whether the distance protection action conditions are satisfied:

式中pm≤pset为传统距离保护动作方程;D(p)<0.1为区分故障范围是否包含UPFC的辅助判据;其中为传统距离保护Ⅰ段整定值;ZL为线路全长正序阻抗,pm为故障测距均值,D(p)为故障测距的方差;In the formula, p m ≤ p set is the traditional distance protection action equation; D(p)<0.1 is the auxiliary criterion for distinguishing whether the fault range includes UPFC; where is the setting value of section I of the traditional distance protection; Z L is the full-length positive sequence impedance of the line, p m is the average value of fault distance measurement, and D(p) is the variance of fault distance measurement;

D(p)反映了故障测距的波动性,构成了判断故障范围是否包含UPFC的辅助判据,考虑了测量误差、分布电容等可能使故障测距结果产生波动性的因素的影响,因此将判据界限定为0.1。当pm与D(p)均满足距离保护动作条件时才判定为保护范围内故障,相应的UPFC的对侧距离Ⅰ段保护跳闸。D(p) reflects the volatility of fault location, and constitutes an auxiliary criterion for judging whether the fault range includes UPFC, considering the influence of measurement errors, distributed capacitance and other factors that may cause fluctuations in fault location results, so the The criterion boundary was set at 0.1. When both p m and D(p) meet the operating conditions of the distance protection, it is judged as a fault within the protection range, and the corresponding UPFC opposite side distance protection section I trips.

实施例1Example 1

下面以具体实施例对本发明做进一步说明。如图2所示的含UPFC的220KV双电源供电系统中,线路长度为100km,距离保护整定为线路全长的80%,UPFC额定容量为100MVA。由本技术领域公知常识可知,220KV系统故障后系统最大可能过渡电阻为100Ω,因此分别取系统经30Ω、60Ω、100Ω三个过渡电阻值,在保护范围末端附近发生单相接地短路故障为例进行分析,假设故障发生在系统运行7s后。实验数据和仿真结果都以故障初始时刻即7s为计时零点,并利用MATLAB取第二个周波内采样数据经全周傅氏算法滤波后计算所得。其仿真结果如图9-图11所示。图3中所示F2处故障时的仿真结果如图12所示,图中Rg为过渡电阻,pF为实际故障距离百分比。The present invention will be further described below with specific examples. In the 220KV dual power supply system including UPFC shown in Figure 2, The length of the line is 100km, the distance protection is set to 80% of the total length of the line, and the rated capacity of UPFC is 100MVA. According to the common knowledge in this technical field, the maximum possible transition resistance of the system after a 220KV system fault is 100Ω, so the three transition resistance values of the system are respectively 30Ω, 60Ω, and 100Ω, and a single-phase grounding short circuit fault near the end of the protection range is taken as an example for analysis. , assuming that the fault occurs after the system runs for 7s. Both the experimental data and the simulation results take 7s as the timing zero point at the initial time of the fault, and use MATLAB to take the sampling data in the second cycle and filter it with the full-cycle Fourier algorithm to calculate it. The simulation results are shown in Figure 9-Figure 11. The simulation results of the fault at F2 shown in Figure 3 are shown in Figure 12, where Rg is the transition resistance, and pF is the actual fault distance percentage.

由仿真结果图9-图11分析可知,本发明的保护方法受故障暂态影响较小,可快速求得正确测距结果,误差小于3%,满足高压系统对保护装置速动性的要求;同时测距波动性较小,测距标准差为10-4左右。因此可正确求解故障距离,进而保证距离Ⅰ段不会拒动或误动。由图12可知,在保护区外F2点故障时,故障测距较大,均大于整定值0.1。由此可见,本发明所属方法的主辅判据相辅相成,可准确区分区内外故障,同时能够克服过渡电阻和UPFC对距离保护的影响。From the analysis of the simulation results shown in Figures 9 to 11, it can be known that the protection method of the present invention is less affected by fault transients, and can quickly obtain the correct ranging result with an error of less than 3%, which meets the requirements of the high-voltage system for the quickness of the protection device; At the same time, the ranging fluctuation is small, and the ranging standard deviation is about 10 -4 . Therefore, the fault distance can be calculated correctly, thereby ensuring that the distance I section will not refuse to operate or malfunction. It can be seen from Figure 12 that when the F2 point is faulty outside the protection zone, the fault distance measurement is relatively large, all of which are greater than the set value of 0.1. It can be seen that the main and auxiliary criteria of the method of the present invention complement each other, can accurately distinguish internal and external faults, and can overcome the influence of transition resistance and UPFC on distance protection.

此实施例仅为本发明较佳的具体实施方式,但本发明的保护范围并不局限于此,任何熟悉本技术领域的技术人员在本发明揭露的技术范围内,可轻易想到的变化或替换,都应涵盖在本发明的保护范围之内。因此,本发明的保护范围应该以权利要求的保护范围为准。This embodiment is only a preferred specific implementation of the present invention, but the scope of protection of the present invention is not limited thereto, any changes or substitutions that can be easily conceived by those skilled in the art within the technical scope disclosed in the present invention , should be covered within the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention should be determined by the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (3)

1. a kind of I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access, which is characterized in that including following step It is rapid:
Step 1: building fault localization equation;It is basic structure with voltage and current phasor diagram after failure according to network analysis figure is simplified Make similar triangles;Fault distance percentage solution formula is constructed according to the corresponding sides ratio equal principle of similar triangles, is led to Search one by one method is crossed to solve fault distance percentage P;
Voltage and current phasor diagram is with fault branch electric current after failure after the failureFor the post-fault system drawn with reference to phasor Installation place is protected to measure electric currentMeasure voltageFault point voltageFault branch electric currentProtect installation place to event Line electricity between barrier pointPhasor diagram;
Step 2: failure criterion solves;Fault localization mean value p is solved according to the fault distance percentage P that step 1 is calculatedmAnd Fault localization variance D (p);
The fault localization mean value pmAnd the method for solving of fault localization variance D (p) is as described below:
It determines sample frequency, the fundametal compoment of sampled signal in the second cycle is solved with full-wave fourier algorithm, is obtained according to solution Fault distance percentage P, calculate the corresponding mean value of each point and variance to get fault localization mean value p is arrivedmAnd fault localization variance D (p), wherein D (p) constitutes assistant criteria;
Step 3: judging operation condition;Fault localization mean value p described in judgment step twomThe calculating knot of its fault localization variance D (p) Whether fruit meets distance protection operation condition.
2. a kind of I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access according to claim 1, It is characterized in that, the fault distance percentage solution formula is as follows:
In formula:Installation place is protected to measure voltage for line end,Installation place is protected to measure electric current for line end,For Faulty line positive sequence impedance angle, ZLFor total track length positive sequence impedance, p is fault distance percentage, i.e. protection installation place to failure The ratio of line length and total track length between point;
When system is single-phase grounding fault,
In formula,Installation place is protected to measure voltage for line end,Installation place is protected to measure electric current for line end,For The phase voltage of single-phase grounding fault route,For the phase current of single-phase grounding fault route, To be System zero-sequence current, intermediate variableZ1For route positive sequence impedance, Z0For route zero sequence impedance;
When system is phase fault,
In formula,For line end protect installation place measure voltage,Installation place is protected to measure electric current for line end,For The line voltage of phase fault route,For the line current of phase fault route,
3. a kind of I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access according to claim 1, It is characterized in that, the step 3 is specific as follows:
Step 301: by pmAnd D (p) is brought into, judges whether to meet distance protection operation condition:
In formula: pm≤psetFor distance protection operation equation;D (p) < 0.1 is to distinguish whether fault coverage includes that the auxiliary of UPFC is sentenced According to;pmFor fault localization mean value;psetFor I section of setting valve of traditional distance protection, whereinZLFor the resistance of total track length positive sequence It is anti-;D (p) is fault localization variance;
Step 302: working as pm, D (p) is when being all satisfied distance protection operation condition, be determined as protection scope internal fault, the opposite side of UPFC I section of trip protection of distance.
CN201710381594.9A 2017-05-22 2017-05-22 I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access Expired - Fee Related CN107104420B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710381594.9A CN107104420B (en) 2017-05-22 2017-05-22 I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201710381594.9A CN107104420B (en) 2017-05-22 2017-05-22 I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN107104420A CN107104420A (en) 2017-08-29
CN107104420B true CN107104420B (en) 2018-12-18

Family

ID=59670361

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201710381594.9A Expired - Fee Related CN107104420B (en) 2017-05-22 2017-05-22 I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN107104420B (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110265980B (en) * 2019-05-23 2021-11-02 昆明理工大学 A Correlation Analysis Based Hybrid Compensation Line Protection Method with UPFC and Fixed Series Compensation C
CN110470950B (en) * 2019-08-16 2021-07-16 深圳供电局有限公司 Transmission line fault location method
CN110470949A (en) * 2019-08-16 2019-11-19 深圳供电局有限公司 Fault positioning method for transmission line
CN112485601B (en) * 2020-12-11 2023-08-25 国网四川省电力公司电力科学研究院 Fault analysis method and system based on electrical quantity information of double-ended lines
CN113109661A (en) * 2021-03-02 2021-07-13 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 Method and system for calculating protection action time of power transmission line
CN113567808B (en) * 2021-07-26 2022-06-28 华北电力大学 A method and system for locating faults on access lines of a unified power flow controller
CN114696304B (en) * 2022-04-24 2023-04-07 天津大学 Single-end quantity protection method of alternating current transmission line based on UPFC boundary

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104134968B (en) * 2014-08-05 2017-04-12 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 Protection method and system for unified power flow controller
CN105207186B (en) * 2015-11-02 2017-11-21 江苏省电力公司电力科学研究院 A kind of distance protecting method for the transmission line of electricity containing THE UPFC
CN109245058B (en) * 2016-05-11 2021-01-01 许继集团有限公司 UPFC-containing power transmission line rapid distance protection method and device
CN106340862B (en) * 2016-10-26 2018-11-13 南京南瑞继保电气有限公司 A kind of distance protecting method for the transmission line of electricity containing series devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107104420A (en) 2017-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107104420B (en) I segment protection method of route distance suitable for THE UPFC access
CN106786424B (en) Send out method for pilot protection of circuit in new energy station based on current waveform similarity
CN106872852B (en) Diagnosis method of single-phase disconnection and grounding complex fault type in distribution network based on zero-sequence voltage
CN105811383B (en) A kind of new micro-capacitance sensor positive sequence impedance differential protecting method
CN108872791B (en) Single-phase high-resistance ground fault identification and protection method for small-resistance grounded distribution network
CN106353642A (en) Small current grounded line gating and tuning method based on arc suppression coil access control short time heteromorphic signal
CN106684834B (en) A kind of power distribution network adaptive Current Protection system and method
CN103293446A (en) Small-current grounding fault line selection method based on arc suppression coil
CN103149502A (en) Fault distance measuring and calculating method for power transmission line based on synchronous sampling device
CN104362600B (en) A kind of transmission line of alternation current cell protection integrated configuration method based on new energy
CN207705796U (en) A kind of multifunctional ligand power grid flexible ground device
CN103149492B (en) Micro-grid short circuit fault diagnose method based on intelligent electric meter
CN107271851B (en) A Wide Area Backup Protection Method Based on Differential Active Power
CN107086549B (en) I segment protection method of distance of UPFC line attachment single-phase grounding fault
CN106786419B (en) Wind power plant based on station domain protection philosophy collects system relay protection method
CN113295970B (en) A Resistive Phase Detection Method for In-situ Isolation of Single Phase-to-Earth Fault
CN105866619B (en) A high-resistance grounding fault detection method for lines based on distributed parameter zero-sequence impedance amplitude characteristics
CN109586254B (en) Voltage time type feeder line reverse closing locking method for half-cycle voltage transient quantity
CN109193595B (en) Fault isolation method for active distribution network based on current phase comparison
Chen et al. A pilot directional protection based on low frequency voltage variable quantity for LCC-HVDC transmission lines
Niu et al. A novel fault location and recognition method for low voltage active distribution network
Sun et al. A novel method for pilot protection based on current fault component
CN116632795A (en) A method and system for longitudinal protection of active distribution network based on sequence components
CN115728591A (en) Fault phase selection method suitable for high-voltage transmission lines in high-proportion new energy systems
CN105067952A (en) Addressing system for single-phase ground fault of low-current grounding system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20181218

Termination date: 20190522

CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee