CA2432423A1 - Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses - Google Patents
Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2432423A1 CA2432423A1 CA002432423A CA2432423A CA2432423A1 CA 2432423 A1 CA2432423 A1 CA 2432423A1 CA 002432423 A CA002432423 A CA 002432423A CA 2432423 A CA2432423 A CA 2432423A CA 2432423 A1 CA2432423 A1 CA 2432423A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- protein
- respiratory syncytial
- syncytial virus
- immunogen
- paramyxovirus
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 title description 8
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 title description 7
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 44
- 230000002163 immunogen Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- LPUQAYUQRXPFSQ-DFWYDOINSA-M monosodium L-glutamate Chemical compound [Na+].[O-]C(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(O)=O LPUQAYUQRXPFSQ-DFWYDOINSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 235000013923 monosodium glutamate Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 239000004223 monosodium glutamate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 241000725643 Respiratory syncytial virus Species 0.000 claims description 36
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 claims description 21
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 229930006000 Sucrose Natural products 0.000 claims description 5
- CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N Sucrose Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@]1(CO)O[C@@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O1 CZMRCDWAGMRECN-UGDNZRGBSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000005720 sucrose Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000003053 immunization Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 238000002649 immunization Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 abstract description 43
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 abstract description 19
- 230000000241 respiratory effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 235000018102 proteins Nutrition 0.000 description 34
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 18
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 15
- 101710085938 Matrix protein Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 101710127721 Membrane protein Proteins 0.000 description 15
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 description 14
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 description 14
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 108010068327 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase Proteins 0.000 description 13
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 13
- 108091006027 G proteins Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 108091000058 GTP-Binding Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 9
- 102000003886 Glycoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 8
- 108090000288 Glycoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 238000002415 sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 208000015181 infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 7
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 206010061603 Respiratory syncytial virus infection Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 238000001262 western blot Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229940037003 alum Drugs 0.000 description 4
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000008188 pellet Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000546 pharmaceutical excipient Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCO LYCAIKOWRPUZTN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glycerine Chemical compound OCC(O)CO PEDCQBHIVMGVHV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(O)=O WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000004480 active ingredient Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940024606 amino acid Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 235000001014 amino acid Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002158 endotoxin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 3
- -1 fibrils Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920006008 lipopolysaccharide Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000030925 respiratory syncytial virus infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000829 suppository Substances 0.000 description 3
- 241000557626 Corvus corax Species 0.000 description 2
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Formaldehyde Chemical compound O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phenol Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1 ISWSIDIOOBJBQZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102000002067 Protein Subunits Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010001267 Protein Subunits Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241001514767 Respiratory syncytial virus type A Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000165108 Respiratory syncytial virus type B Species 0.000 description 2
- KEAYESYHFKHZAL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium Chemical class [Na] KEAYESYHFKHZAL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005875 antibody response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 206010006451 bronchitis Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 150000001720 carbohydrates Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000014633 carbohydrates Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000000969 carrier Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012504 chromatography matrix Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100000517 death Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229940049906 glutamate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 229930195712 glutamate Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 230000005745 host immune response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000987 immune system Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000005847 immunogenicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 2
- NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N insulin Chemical compound N1C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)CN)C(C)CC)CSSCC(C(NC(CO)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CCC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(C)C)C(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(=O)NC(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)C(=O)NC(CSSCC(NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2C=CC(O)=CC=2)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(C)NC(=O)C(CCC(O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(CC=2NC=NC=2)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)CNC2=O)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CCC(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CCCNC(N)=N)C(=O)NCC(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC=CC=3)C(=O)NC(CC=3C=CC(O)=CC=3)C(=O)NC(C(C)O)C(=O)N3C(CCC3)C(=O)NC(CCCCN)C(=O)NC(C)C(O)=O)C(=O)NC(CC(N)=O)C(O)=O)=O)NC(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C(CO)NC(=O)C(C(C)O)NC(=O)C1CSSCC2NC(=O)C(CC(C)C)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(CCC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(CC(N)=O)NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C(N)CC=1C=CC=CC=1)C(C)C)CC1=CN=CN1 NOESYZHRGYRDHS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004255 ion exchange chromatography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000021633 leukocyte mediated immunity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002480 mineral oil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000010446 mineral oil Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- BSOQXXWZTUDTEL-ZUYCGGNHSA-N muramyl dipeptide Chemical compound OC(=O)CC[C@H](C(N)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](CO)O[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1NC(C)=O BSOQXXWZTUDTEL-ZUYCGGNHSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000001717 pathogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001184 polypeptide Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229930182490 saponin Natural products 0.000 description 2
- 150000007949 saponins Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 235000017709 saponins Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229940073490 sodium glutamate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013268 sustained release Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012730 sustained-release form Substances 0.000 description 2
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009385 viral infection Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002845 virion Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000040650 (ribonucleotides)n+m Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010042708 Acetylmuramyl-Alanyl-Isoglutamine Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000002109 Argyria Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010057248 Cell death Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000006545 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- BWGNESOTFCXPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen disulfide Chemical compound SS BWGNESOTFCXPMA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 208000000655 Distemper Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000012286 ELISA Assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000030782 GTP binding Human genes 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Glutamic acid Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(O)=O WHUUTDBJXJRKMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108060003393 Granulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010018691 Granuloma Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000711920 Human orthopneumovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000004877 Insulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001061 Insulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010022941 Iridocyclitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004895 Lipoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090001030 Lipoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 206010024971 Lower respiratory tract infections Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000005505 Measles Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010052285 Membrane Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000018697 Membrane Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000005647 Mumps Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000711408 Murine respirovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 206010028735 Nasal congestion Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000010359 Newcastle Disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000011931 Nucleoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010061100 Nucleoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000711504 Paramyxoviridae Species 0.000 description 1
- 208000002606 Paramyxoviridae Infections Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010035664 Pneumonia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229920000604 Polyethylene Glycol 200 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 206010037660 Pyrexia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229940124679 RSV vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 208000035415 Reinfection Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000018569 Respiratory Tract disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000006382 Ribonucleases Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010083644 Ribonucleases Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000004389 Ribonucleoproteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010081734 Ribonucleoproteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000006257 Rinderpest Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 101710200413 Small hydrophobic protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000024932 T cell mediated immunity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010043376 Tetanus Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102000004142 Trypsin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108090000631 Trypsin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108700005077 Viral Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020000999 Viral RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000001154 acute effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007815 allergy Effects 0.000 description 1
- WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3] WNROFYMDJYEPJX-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- VGCXJFJOOIQMHR-UHFFFAOYSA-K aluminum;phosphate Chemical compound [Al].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O VGCXJFJOOIQMHR-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 208000022531 anorexia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 201000004612 anterior uveitis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000008346 aqueous phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010003246 arthritis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N beta-D-glucose Chemical compound OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-VFUOTHLCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010504 bond cleavage reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006664 bond formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012888 bovine serum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009933 burial Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001506 calcium phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000389 calcium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011010 calcium phosphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 208000014058 canine distemper Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 239000002775 capsule Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000034303 cell budding Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000002144 chemical decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000005829 chemical entities Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004587 chromatography analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009089 cytolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001151 cytotoxic T lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006240 deamidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010061428 decreased appetite Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000004925 denaturation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036425 denaturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008121 dextrose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000539 dimer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 206010013023 diphtheria Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001840 diploid cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002552 dosage form Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241001493065 dsRNA viruses Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003995 emulsifying agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005713 exacerbation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011536 extraction buffer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001605 fetal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011049 filling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000011194 food seasoning agent Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 235000013922 glutamic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004220 glutamic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002334 glycols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000005842 heteroatom Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000008348 humoral response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036571 hydration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006703 hydration reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000001257 hydrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052739 hydrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 125000001165 hydrophobic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 229910052588 hydroxylapatite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000003308 immunostimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940031551 inactivated vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000002779 inactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002458 infectious effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 206010022000 influenza Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229940125396 insulin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000543 intermediate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- GZQKNULLWNGMCW-PWQABINMSA-N lipid A (E. coli) Chemical compound O1[C@H](CO)[C@@H](OP(O)(O)=O)[C@H](OC(=O)C[C@@H](CCCCCCCCCCC)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCCCC)[C@@H](NC(=O)C[C@@H](CCCCCCCCCCC)OC(=O)CCCCCCCCCCC)[C@@H]1OC[C@@H]1[C@@H](O)[C@H](OC(=O)C[C@H](O)CCCCCCCCCCC)[C@@H](NC(=O)C[C@H](O)CCCCCCCCCCC)[C@@H](OP(O)(O)=O)O1 GZQKNULLWNGMCW-PWQABINMSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002502 liposome Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006193 liquid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006194 liquid suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZLNQQNXFFQJAID-UHFFFAOYSA-L magnesium carbonate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-]C([O-])=O ZLNQQNXFFQJAID-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000001095 magnesium carbonate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910000021 magnesium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013379 molasses Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940031346 monovalent vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 208000010805 mumps infectious disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- HEGSGKPQLMEBJL-RKQHYHRCSA-N octyl beta-D-glucopyranoside Chemical compound CCCCCCCCO[C@@H]1O[C@H](CO)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O HEGSGKPQLMEBJL-RKQHYHRCSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009965 odorless effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012803 optimization experiment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006179 pH buffering agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- XYJRXVWERLGGKC-UHFFFAOYSA-D pentacalcium;hydroxide;triphosphate Chemical compound [OH-].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O XYJRXVWERLGGKC-UHFFFAOYSA-D 0.000 description 1
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006187 pill Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920002401 polyacrylamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011164 primary particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006916 protein interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017854 proteolysis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002510 pyrogen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006340 racemization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002345 respiratory system Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- CVHZOJJKTDOEJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N saccharin Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(=O)NS(=O)(=O)C2=C1 CVHZOJJKTDOEJC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007920 subcutaneous administration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940031626 subunit vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003826 tablet Substances 0.000 description 1
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003626 triacylglycerols Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H tricalcium bis(phosphate) Chemical compound [Ca+2].[Ca+2].[Ca+2].[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O.[O-]P([O-])([O-])=O QORWJWZARLRLPR-UHFFFAOYSA-H 0.000 description 1
- 239000012588 trypsin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000108 ultra-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007501 viral attachment Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009736 wetting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000080 wetting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
Abstract
Subunit non-adjuvanted immunogenic compositions of respiratory syncytial vir us were stabilized by the formulation with various stabilizing agents including monosodium glutamate. The formulations retained protein conformation for at least 8 weeks at elevated temperatures.
Description
sTA~u.rzATZON o~ mToGEhrs nElu~u h~olva rA~xov>a~us~s FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to the field of immunology and :is particularly concerned with the stabilization of antigens derived from pararnyxoviruses.
13ACKGI2~UNB TO THE INVENTION
The family Paramyxoviridae describe an extremely broad array of viruses which cause numerous serious infections. These infections include mumps, Newcastle disease, measles, canine distemper, rinderpest, various parainfluenza viruses like Sendai virus and simian virus, and Respiratory Syneytial Virus. Human respiratory syncytial virus, (RSV) for example, is the main pause of lower respiratory tract infections am~ng infants and young children (refs. 1-3 - a list of references appears at the end of the disclosure and each of the references in the list is incorporated herein by reference thereto).
Pararnyxoviruses, like all negative-strand RNA viruses, comprise two structural modules: an internal ribonucleoprotein core called "the nucleocapsid" and an outer, roughly spherical lipoprotein envelope. The nucleocapsid contains a single-stranded viral RNA genome.
Paramyxoviruses are generally 150 to 250 nm in diameter, but even larger virus pay-tides are quite common. Some paramyxoviruses are shaped Like filaments and are larger as a result. These vaz-iations, or pleomorgh~sms, reflect a relative lack of stringency in the budding stage of the virus assembly process yielding virus particles that possess two or more genome equivalents.
The surfaces of paramyxoviruses have a fuzzy appearance by negative staining because of stalk-like glycoprotein complexes that mediate virus attachment and penetration.
Virus envelopes axe tough enough to provide effective protection in the transport of nucleocapsids from cell to cell, but they often do not withstand the stresses of drying on electron microscope g~:ids. Hence, they often rupture spontaneously, either releasing the nucleocapsids or permitting the negative stain to enter and outline the morphology of the nucleocapsid.
The helical symmetry of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids is made especially obvious by the large size of the protein structure units, giving the edges of the rods a serrated appearance. The "spiral-WO 02/12289 ~'CT/~AOt/01108
This invention relates to the field of immunology and :is particularly concerned with the stabilization of antigens derived from pararnyxoviruses.
13ACKGI2~UNB TO THE INVENTION
The family Paramyxoviridae describe an extremely broad array of viruses which cause numerous serious infections. These infections include mumps, Newcastle disease, measles, canine distemper, rinderpest, various parainfluenza viruses like Sendai virus and simian virus, and Respiratory Syneytial Virus. Human respiratory syncytial virus, (RSV) for example, is the main pause of lower respiratory tract infections am~ng infants and young children (refs. 1-3 - a list of references appears at the end of the disclosure and each of the references in the list is incorporated herein by reference thereto).
Pararnyxoviruses, like all negative-strand RNA viruses, comprise two structural modules: an internal ribonucleoprotein core called "the nucleocapsid" and an outer, roughly spherical lipoprotein envelope. The nucleocapsid contains a single-stranded viral RNA genome.
Paramyxoviruses are generally 150 to 250 nm in diameter, but even larger virus pay-tides are quite common. Some paramyxoviruses are shaped Like filaments and are larger as a result. These vaz-iations, or pleomorgh~sms, reflect a relative lack of stringency in the budding stage of the virus assembly process yielding virus particles that possess two or more genome equivalents.
The surfaces of paramyxoviruses have a fuzzy appearance by negative staining because of stalk-like glycoprotein complexes that mediate virus attachment and penetration.
Virus envelopes axe tough enough to provide effective protection in the transport of nucleocapsids from cell to cell, but they often do not withstand the stresses of drying on electron microscope g~:ids. Hence, they often rupture spontaneously, either releasing the nucleocapsids or permitting the negative stain to enter and outline the morphology of the nucleocapsid.
The helical symmetry of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids is made especially obvious by the large size of the protein structure units, giving the edges of the rods a serrated appearance. The "spiral-WO 02/12289 ~'CT/~AOt/01108
2 staircase" nature of the nucleocapsid helix produces an empty central con; in the rod, which can be penetrated by a negative stain.
Environmental conditions, such as ionic composition and pH, affect the flexibiliiy of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids. Such flexibility undoubtedly enables a nucleocapsid to meet two biological requirements: (1) coiling into a f~rm that is compact enough to fit into a unit-.size virion envelope and (2) exposing the RNA within to the attention of enzymes that use the RNA as a template.
When environmental conditions cause the nucleocapsid to lose flexibility, its full length relative to the diameter of a unit virion is easily appreciated. Each genome of a paramyxovirus occupies a single nucleocapsid, and each paramyxovirus genome contains a complete set of six or more viral genes covalently linked in tandem. The protein structure units of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids protect the associated RNA completely from added ribonuclease.
Those skilled in the art also will recognise Respiratory Syncytial Virus as a representative example of the morphology of paramyxoviruses. The structure and composition of ftZespiratory Syncytial Virus have been elucidated and described in detail in the textbook "Fields Virol~gy", Fields, B.N. et al.
Raven Press, N.Y. (1996), in particular, Chapter 54, pp 1285 - 1304 "Respiratory Syneytial 'liras" by P., Mclntosh, K., and Chanock, R:~I. (ref. 4).
Respiratory Syncytial Virus is one of the most important causes of lower respiratory tract illness in infants two to six months of age and children (ref. 5). In the USA
alone, 100,000 children may require hospitalization for pneumonia and bronchitis caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a single year (refs. 6, '7); and providing impatient and ambulatory care for children with Respiratory Syncytial Virus infections costs in excess of $340 million annually (ref $). More importantly, approximately 4,000 infants in the USA die each year from complications arising from severe respiratory tract disease caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Paxainfluenza type 3 virus infection. Further, 65 million infections occur globally every year resulting in 160,000 deaths (ref. 9).
The World Health Organization and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious i7isease vaccine
Environmental conditions, such as ionic composition and pH, affect the flexibiliiy of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids. Such flexibility undoubtedly enables a nucleocapsid to meet two biological requirements: (1) coiling into a f~rm that is compact enough to fit into a unit-.size virion envelope and (2) exposing the RNA within to the attention of enzymes that use the RNA as a template.
When environmental conditions cause the nucleocapsid to lose flexibility, its full length relative to the diameter of a unit virion is easily appreciated. Each genome of a paramyxovirus occupies a single nucleocapsid, and each paramyxovirus genome contains a complete set of six or more viral genes covalently linked in tandem. The protein structure units of paramyxovirus nucleocapsids protect the associated RNA completely from added ribonuclease.
Those skilled in the art also will recognise Respiratory Syncytial Virus as a representative example of the morphology of paramyxoviruses. The structure and composition of ftZespiratory Syncytial Virus have been elucidated and described in detail in the textbook "Fields Virol~gy", Fields, B.N. et al.
Raven Press, N.Y. (1996), in particular, Chapter 54, pp 1285 - 1304 "Respiratory Syneytial 'liras" by P., Mclntosh, K., and Chanock, R:~I. (ref. 4).
Respiratory Syncytial Virus is one of the most important causes of lower respiratory tract illness in infants two to six months of age and children (ref. 5). In the USA
alone, 100,000 children may require hospitalization for pneumonia and bronchitis caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a single year (refs. 6, '7); and providing impatient and ambulatory care for children with Respiratory Syncytial Virus infections costs in excess of $340 million annually (ref $). More importantly, approximately 4,000 infants in the USA die each year from complications arising from severe respiratory tract disease caused by Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Paxainfluenza type 3 virus infection. Further, 65 million infections occur globally every year resulting in 160,000 deaths (ref. 9).
The World Health Organization and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious i7isease vaccine
3 advisory committees have ranked Respiratory Syncytial Virus second only to HIV
for vaccine development.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection in adults was initially considered a significant prablern only in certain high-risk populations, such as the institutionalized elderly, plowever, evidence has been accumulating that the infection occurs frequently irs previously healthy adults (ref. 10). Respiratory Syncytial Virus infections in the elderly usually represent reinfection s in those who have had many prior episodes. These infections have been reported to cause altered aia~vay resistance and exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease. In adults over 60 years old, Respiratory Syneytial Virus usually causes mild nasal congestion and may also result in fever, anorexia, pneumor~a, bronchitis and death (rei: 1 t).
A vaccine is not yet available even though the importance o:f RSV as a respiratory pathogen has been recognized for over 30 years. Several strategies have been used in RSV
vaccine development including inactivation of the virus with formalin (ref. I9), isolation of cold adapted and/or temperature sensitive mutant viruses (re~ 20) and purified F or G glycoproteins (refs. 21, 22, 23). Clinical trial results have shown that bath Live attenuated and forrnalin-inactivated vaccines failed to adequately protect against RS virus infection (ref. 24). Thus a subunit vaccine producing the proper immune response is desirable.
The two major protective antigens from RSV that induce virus neutralizing antibodies are the envelope fusion (F) glycoprotein and the attachment (G) glycoprotein (ref.
12). 'The F protein is synthesized as a precursor molecule (Fs) about 68 kBa which is protealytically cleaved into two disulfide-linked polypeptide fragments, Fl about 48 kDa and F2 about 20 ki5a (ref. 13). The G protein about 33 kDa is heavily O-glycosylated giving rise to a glycoprotein having a molecular weight of about 90 kDa (ref. 14). Two broad subtypes of Respiratory Syncytial Virus> have been defined as A and B (ref.
15). The major antigenic differences between these subtypes are found in the G
glycoprotein while the F
glycoprotein is more conserved (refs. 8, 16). In addition to the antibody response generated by the F and G glycoproteins, human cytotoxic T cells produced by Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection have been shown to recognize matrix protein (M), nucleoprotein (i~, and small hydrophobic protein SH (ref. 17).
WO 02/12289 PCTlCAO'l/01108
for vaccine development.
Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection in adults was initially considered a significant prablern only in certain high-risk populations, such as the institutionalized elderly, plowever, evidence has been accumulating that the infection occurs frequently irs previously healthy adults (ref. 10). Respiratory Syncytial Virus infections in the elderly usually represent reinfection s in those who have had many prior episodes. These infections have been reported to cause altered aia~vay resistance and exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease. In adults over 60 years old, Respiratory Syneytial Virus usually causes mild nasal congestion and may also result in fever, anorexia, pneumor~a, bronchitis and death (rei: 1 t).
A vaccine is not yet available even though the importance o:f RSV as a respiratory pathogen has been recognized for over 30 years. Several strategies have been used in RSV
vaccine development including inactivation of the virus with formalin (ref. I9), isolation of cold adapted and/or temperature sensitive mutant viruses (re~ 20) and purified F or G glycoproteins (refs. 21, 22, 23). Clinical trial results have shown that bath Live attenuated and forrnalin-inactivated vaccines failed to adequately protect against RS virus infection (ref. 24). Thus a subunit vaccine producing the proper immune response is desirable.
The two major protective antigens from RSV that induce virus neutralizing antibodies are the envelope fusion (F) glycoprotein and the attachment (G) glycoprotein (ref.
12). 'The F protein is synthesized as a precursor molecule (Fs) about 68 kBa which is protealytically cleaved into two disulfide-linked polypeptide fragments, Fl about 48 kDa and F2 about 20 ki5a (ref. 13). The G protein about 33 kDa is heavily O-glycosylated giving rise to a glycoprotein having a molecular weight of about 90 kDa (ref. 14). Two broad subtypes of Respiratory Syncytial Virus> have been defined as A and B (ref.
15). The major antigenic differences between these subtypes are found in the G
glycoprotein while the F
glycoprotein is more conserved (refs. 8, 16). In addition to the antibody response generated by the F and G glycoproteins, human cytotoxic T cells produced by Respiratory Syncytial Virus infection have been shown to recognize matrix protein (M), nucleoprotein (i~, and small hydrophobic protein SH (ref. 17).
WO 02/12289 PCTlCAO'l/01108
4 US Patent No. 6,020,182, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, issued February 1, 2000, teaches the combination of a mixture of Respiratory Syncytial Virus proteins in a vaccine formulation to provide an immune response which is substantially the same as that obtained by administration of the components individually. Accordingly, there is no observed detrimental effect on the irnmunogenicity of the individual components by combining them in a single formulation.
Consequently, immunogenic compositions for conferring protection in a host against disease caused by Respiratory Syneytial Virus may comprise an immunoeffeetive amount of a rnixturc of purred fusion (F) PO protein, attachment (G) protein and matrix (M) protein of Respiratory Syncytial Virus. The imrnunngenic composition preferably is formulated as a vaccine for in vivo administration to the host.
The Respiratory Syncytial Virus protein mixture employed by those skilled in the art, when analyzed by reduced SDS-PAGE analysis, may comprise fusion (F) protein with an FI subunit of approximately 48 kDa and an F2 subunit of approximately 23 kDa; attachment (G) protein with a Gl subunit of approximately 95 kDa and a G2 subunit of approximately 55 kDa; and matrix EM) protein with an M subunit of approximately 31 kDa. When analyzed by SDS-PAGE under reducing canditions and densitometric scanning following silver staining, the ratio of FI subunit of molecular weight approximately 48 kDa to F2 subunit of molecular weight approximately 23 kDa in this mixture may be approximately between 1:1 and 2:1. The Respiratory Syneytial Virus proteins provided in the mixture generally are substantially non-denatured by the mild conditions of preparation and may comprise Respiratory Syncytial Virus proteins from one or both of subtypes Respiratory Syncytial Virus A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, ibid.
Stabilizing these kinds of protein compositions is difficult but necessary if they are to be useful.
Generally, protein instability can be divided into two forms, chenucal instability and physical instability, Chemical instability relates to processes that involve the formation or destruction of covalent bonds which lead to new chemical entities. These processes include reactions such as proteolysis, deamidation, racemization, oxidation, and elimination. Physical instability refers to any change of state that does not include bond cleavage or formation and is most relevant to the stabilisation of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses.
W~ 02/12289 PCTICA01/01108 S
Physical instability relates to a number of processes the most conunon of which is denaturation, or loss of the higher-order, globular structure that proteins adopt upon folding. Physical instability also includes aggregation, precipitation, and adsorption to surfaces. Aggregation is defined as a nucroscopic pmcess whereby protein mol~ules associate. These aggregates may be as small as dimexs (as with insulin) or large primary particles, which occur as intermediates in the precipitation process. In either case, the aggregates remain in solution and are not visible to the naked eye.
The activity and immunogenicity of the aggregates may be different from the nahive protein.
Precipitation, on the other hand, is a macroscopic process, producing a visible material. This may take the form of an amorphous solid, fibrils, crystals, or simply clouding of the solution. Adsorption is the association of proteins with surfaces rather than each other, although both may occur. The surface may be a solid, such as a container or column, or it may be a gaseous interface, such as at the air-water interface. All of the above types of physical processes have dramatic consequences for pharmaceutical scientists attempting to handle biotechnology products. {ref. 18).
Pharmaceutical scientists are faced with greater and more complex formulation challenges as the tremendous expansion in molecular biology and immunology produces an ever larger number of new and novel immunogens and as advances in biochenustry continue to increase the purity of immunogens.
Furthermore, in addition to formulations for the more traditional injectalile products, there is now a demand for alternate dosage forms. What makes this particularly challenging is that increased purification of these products removes them ever further from their most stable natural environments.
Solvent protein interaction strongly influences conformation. Polypeptide chains of more than 50 linear amino acids have secondary, tertiary, and sometimes quaternary structural conforniations. The structure of these chains greatly effects their overall function, including imrnunogenicity. Fuxther, each of the 20 amino acids has its own functional group side chain, and both secondary and tertiary structure result from the sequence and interaction of these side chains. Water, the noranal solvent of proteins, forms a hydration layer around the protein and contnbutes to hydrogen bonding.
The hydrophobic interaction of the amino acid hydrocarbon side chains buried within the molecule provides additional stabilization energy. Generally, because proteins exist in an aqueous environment, the folding of the WO 02112289 fCT/CA01/01108 molecule results in the internal burial of hydrophobic groups and the surface exposure of hydrophilic groups. This results in an energetically favorable state.
The purification process strips away contaminates, such as carbohydrates;
salts; lipids; and other proteins, that keep immunogenic protein subunits neatly folded into therxrmdynamically favorable shapes.
When such contaminates are removed, new hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas are exposed changing the overall thermodynamics of the immunvgen and causing it to change shape.
Disruption of the structure occurs when the solvent partitions hydrocarbon side chains between the hydrocarbon phase and the aqueous phase. A highly purified protein suburrit is rendered more sensitive to processes such as shear, agitation, enzymatic and chemical degradation, and aggregation because the removal of contaminates changes the thermodynamics of the subunit, It is the tertiary structure of protein subunit immunogens v~. particular that must be stabilized against various disruptive forces that occur during processing and handling.
Potential denaturing forces include both chemical and physical stress. Chemical stress results from factors used in purification such as pH, ionic strength, and detergents. Physical stress results from filtration and filling where surface adsorption and shear contribute to the unwinding of tertiary structure into a random coil.
As described above, paramyxoviruses are prevalent and cause terrible infections. It would be desirable to confer protection against such iztfections with the administration of a vaccine. Such a vaccine might be composed from at least one affective immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus, It would facilitate the use of these immunogens if they could be stabilized and stored at temperatures above freezing so as not to loss their conformational structures. lHfowever, many issues and concerns combine to make the prediction and discovery of suitable formulation excipients and processes very difficult, and a method to stabilize immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses is unknown.
2~ SUMMAR.Y QF THE IhTVEN".fIOhT
The inventors have surprisingly discovered that immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses are stabilized when formulated with monosodium glutamate (MSfi). Monosodium glutamate is known to those skilled in the art as a monosodium salt of the naturally occurring L.form of glutamic acid is manufactured by fermentation of carbohydrate sources such as sugar best molasses. The Chinese have ...,.. ... ,...., .. ..,_. .._ ...... _ . . ,:;, ,. . . _,__. ~" ..;. _.. , , ..,",.; .., x.,.,_,.~, , . , ::.... "v. ~., -.:;:. "T.,. ,... , .,...,,,"._~ _ .. . ..:.... . . .. ....., ,_...,...:,., WO 02/12289 PC'f/CA01/01108 used monosodium glutamate as a seasoning in foods for centuries. This white, practically odorless material takes the form of crystals or a free-flowing czystalline powder and is very soluble in water. The present invention is directed toward the stabilization of paramyxovirus antigenic preparations, such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus vaccine, with monosodium glutamate.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided an antigenic preparation comprised of at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. The immunogen may be derived from the paramyxovirus Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Predetearnined concentrations of monosodium glutamate include about between 0.12 and 20% wt/v.
In one embodiment of the present invention, where the at least one immunogen is derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus, the at least one irnrnunogen may be selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (M) protein. Further, the subunit proteins in the aforementioned group may be puribed. In another aspect of this invention, the at least one irnmunogen may be derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus type A or B, and the newly stabilized antigenic preparations may include sucrose.
The present invention also includes a vaccine formulated from an antigenic preparation comprising at least one irnmunogen derived from a panamyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. In addition, the invention includes a method for producing a stable vaccine comprising the steps of combining at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of rr~onosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. The immunogen may be derived frown the paramyxovirus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
Predetermined concentrations of monosodium glutamate include shout between 0.12 and 20°10 (wtv).
In a further aspect of the invention, when the at least one immvnogen is derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus, the at least one immunogen may be selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (IvI) protein. Further, the subunit proteins in the aforementioned group may be purified. In addition, the at least one immunogera may be deritved from wo ozn22s9 PCTicAOVolios Respiratory Syncytial Virus type A or B, and the newly stabilized vaccines may be combined with a suitable adjuvant.
The invention also extends to a method of generating an innnune response in a host, including human, comprising administering thereto an immuno-effective amount of the immunogenic compositions provided here in.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TIDE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a graph demonstrating R8V A M ELISA activity over time at
Consequently, immunogenic compositions for conferring protection in a host against disease caused by Respiratory Syneytial Virus may comprise an immunoeffeetive amount of a rnixturc of purred fusion (F) PO protein, attachment (G) protein and matrix (M) protein of Respiratory Syncytial Virus. The imrnunngenic composition preferably is formulated as a vaccine for in vivo administration to the host.
The Respiratory Syncytial Virus protein mixture employed by those skilled in the art, when analyzed by reduced SDS-PAGE analysis, may comprise fusion (F) protein with an FI subunit of approximately 48 kDa and an F2 subunit of approximately 23 kDa; attachment (G) protein with a Gl subunit of approximately 95 kDa and a G2 subunit of approximately 55 kDa; and matrix EM) protein with an M subunit of approximately 31 kDa. When analyzed by SDS-PAGE under reducing canditions and densitometric scanning following silver staining, the ratio of FI subunit of molecular weight approximately 48 kDa to F2 subunit of molecular weight approximately 23 kDa in this mixture may be approximately between 1:1 and 2:1. The Respiratory Syneytial Virus proteins provided in the mixture generally are substantially non-denatured by the mild conditions of preparation and may comprise Respiratory Syncytial Virus proteins from one or both of subtypes Respiratory Syncytial Virus A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, ibid.
Stabilizing these kinds of protein compositions is difficult but necessary if they are to be useful.
Generally, protein instability can be divided into two forms, chenucal instability and physical instability, Chemical instability relates to processes that involve the formation or destruction of covalent bonds which lead to new chemical entities. These processes include reactions such as proteolysis, deamidation, racemization, oxidation, and elimination. Physical instability refers to any change of state that does not include bond cleavage or formation and is most relevant to the stabilisation of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses.
W~ 02/12289 PCTICA01/01108 S
Physical instability relates to a number of processes the most conunon of which is denaturation, or loss of the higher-order, globular structure that proteins adopt upon folding. Physical instability also includes aggregation, precipitation, and adsorption to surfaces. Aggregation is defined as a nucroscopic pmcess whereby protein mol~ules associate. These aggregates may be as small as dimexs (as with insulin) or large primary particles, which occur as intermediates in the precipitation process. In either case, the aggregates remain in solution and are not visible to the naked eye.
The activity and immunogenicity of the aggregates may be different from the nahive protein.
Precipitation, on the other hand, is a macroscopic process, producing a visible material. This may take the form of an amorphous solid, fibrils, crystals, or simply clouding of the solution. Adsorption is the association of proteins with surfaces rather than each other, although both may occur. The surface may be a solid, such as a container or column, or it may be a gaseous interface, such as at the air-water interface. All of the above types of physical processes have dramatic consequences for pharmaceutical scientists attempting to handle biotechnology products. {ref. 18).
Pharmaceutical scientists are faced with greater and more complex formulation challenges as the tremendous expansion in molecular biology and immunology produces an ever larger number of new and novel immunogens and as advances in biochenustry continue to increase the purity of immunogens.
Furthermore, in addition to formulations for the more traditional injectalile products, there is now a demand for alternate dosage forms. What makes this particularly challenging is that increased purification of these products removes them ever further from their most stable natural environments.
Solvent protein interaction strongly influences conformation. Polypeptide chains of more than 50 linear amino acids have secondary, tertiary, and sometimes quaternary structural conforniations. The structure of these chains greatly effects their overall function, including imrnunogenicity. Fuxther, each of the 20 amino acids has its own functional group side chain, and both secondary and tertiary structure result from the sequence and interaction of these side chains. Water, the noranal solvent of proteins, forms a hydration layer around the protein and contnbutes to hydrogen bonding.
The hydrophobic interaction of the amino acid hydrocarbon side chains buried within the molecule provides additional stabilization energy. Generally, because proteins exist in an aqueous environment, the folding of the WO 02112289 fCT/CA01/01108 molecule results in the internal burial of hydrophobic groups and the surface exposure of hydrophilic groups. This results in an energetically favorable state.
The purification process strips away contaminates, such as carbohydrates;
salts; lipids; and other proteins, that keep immunogenic protein subunits neatly folded into therxrmdynamically favorable shapes.
When such contaminates are removed, new hydrophobic and hydrophilic areas are exposed changing the overall thermodynamics of the immunvgen and causing it to change shape.
Disruption of the structure occurs when the solvent partitions hydrocarbon side chains between the hydrocarbon phase and the aqueous phase. A highly purified protein suburrit is rendered more sensitive to processes such as shear, agitation, enzymatic and chemical degradation, and aggregation because the removal of contaminates changes the thermodynamics of the subunit, It is the tertiary structure of protein subunit immunogens v~. particular that must be stabilized against various disruptive forces that occur during processing and handling.
Potential denaturing forces include both chemical and physical stress. Chemical stress results from factors used in purification such as pH, ionic strength, and detergents. Physical stress results from filtration and filling where surface adsorption and shear contribute to the unwinding of tertiary structure into a random coil.
As described above, paramyxoviruses are prevalent and cause terrible infections. It would be desirable to confer protection against such iztfections with the administration of a vaccine. Such a vaccine might be composed from at least one affective immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus, It would facilitate the use of these immunogens if they could be stabilized and stored at temperatures above freezing so as not to loss their conformational structures. lHfowever, many issues and concerns combine to make the prediction and discovery of suitable formulation excipients and processes very difficult, and a method to stabilize immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses is unknown.
2~ SUMMAR.Y QF THE IhTVEN".fIOhT
The inventors have surprisingly discovered that immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses are stabilized when formulated with monosodium glutamate (MSfi). Monosodium glutamate is known to those skilled in the art as a monosodium salt of the naturally occurring L.form of glutamic acid is manufactured by fermentation of carbohydrate sources such as sugar best molasses. The Chinese have ...,.. ... ,...., .. ..,_. .._ ...... _ . . ,:;, ,. . . _,__. ~" ..;. _.. , , ..,",.; .., x.,.,_,.~, , . , ::.... "v. ~., -.:;:. "T.,. ,... , .,...,,,"._~ _ .. . ..:.... . . .. ....., ,_...,...:,., WO 02/12289 PC'f/CA01/01108 used monosodium glutamate as a seasoning in foods for centuries. This white, practically odorless material takes the form of crystals or a free-flowing czystalline powder and is very soluble in water. The present invention is directed toward the stabilization of paramyxovirus antigenic preparations, such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus vaccine, with monosodium glutamate.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided an antigenic preparation comprised of at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. The immunogen may be derived from the paramyxovirus Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Predetearnined concentrations of monosodium glutamate include about between 0.12 and 20% wt/v.
In one embodiment of the present invention, where the at least one immunogen is derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus, the at least one irnrnunogen may be selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (M) protein. Further, the subunit proteins in the aforementioned group may be puribed. In another aspect of this invention, the at least one irnmunogen may be derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus type A or B, and the newly stabilized antigenic preparations may include sucrose.
The present invention also includes a vaccine formulated from an antigenic preparation comprising at least one irnmunogen derived from a panamyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. In addition, the invention includes a method for producing a stable vaccine comprising the steps of combining at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of rr~onosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor. The immunogen may be derived frown the paramyxovirus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
Predetermined concentrations of monosodium glutamate include shout between 0.12 and 20°10 (wtv).
In a further aspect of the invention, when the at least one immvnogen is derived from Respiratory Syncytial Virus, the at least one immunogen may be selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (IvI) protein. Further, the subunit proteins in the aforementioned group may be purified. In addition, the at least one immunogera may be deritved from wo ozn22s9 PCTicAOVolios Respiratory Syncytial Virus type A or B, and the newly stabilized vaccines may be combined with a suitable adjuvant.
The invention also extends to a method of generating an innnune response in a host, including human, comprising administering thereto an immuno-effective amount of the immunogenic compositions provided here in.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF TIDE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 shows a graph demonstrating R8V A M ELISA activity over time at
5°C, 25°C and 37°C in the unformulated RSV preparation described in example 1.
Figure 2 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of 1M monosodium glutamate on the M ELhSA activity of the RSV preparation described in example 1 for at least eight weeks at 25°C.
Figure 3 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of monosodium glutamate compared to other stabilizers at maintaining RSV M ELISA activity for at least eight weeks at 25°C.
Figure 4 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of 1 M sodium glutamate on RSV F
protein ELISA activity at 25 and 37° C
Figure 5 shows a graph demonstrating the M ELISA stability eff~t of 5% sucrose and 1D% MSG
at 25°C and 37°C.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TNVENTION
Itnmunogens derived from paramyxoviruses are stabilized when combined with monosodium glutamate. The immunogens may be isolated and purified from paramyxoviruses like Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
Studies were initiated on RSV A non-adjuvanted vaccine because of an observation of a rapid loss of M protein antigen ELISA reactivity in stability studies at elevated temperature, and a gradual loss over time (6 months to 1 year) at 2-8°C. This loss of reactivity was not directly correlated with a loss of M protein (as judged by SDS PAGE and Western blot), and thus likely involved a change in protein conformation. The experiments show that the addition of monosodium. glutamate increases the stabilization of the M ELISA, F ELISA, and the F and M proteins as judged by SDS-PAGE.
WO 021122A9 PCTlCA01/Q1108 1. Vaccine Preparation and tTse Immunogenic compositions, suitable to be used as vaccines; may be prepared from mixtures comprising immunogenic F,G and M proteins of RSV. The immunogenic composition elicits an immune response which produces antibodies, including anti-I~.SV antibodies which are anti-F, anti-G and anti-M
antibodies.
Immunogenic compositions including vaccines may be prepared as injeetables, as liquid solutions, suspensions or emulsions. The active immunogenic ingredients may be mixed with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, which are compatible therewith.
Such excipients may include water, saline, dextrose, glycerol, ethanol and combinations thereof.
The immunogenic compositions and vaccines may further contain a~zxiliary substances, such as, wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering agents, or adjuvants to enhance the effectiveness thereof Immunogenic compositions and vaccines may be administered parentally, by injection subcutaneous, intradermal or intramuscularly injection. Alternatively, the immunogenic compositions formulated according to the present invention, may be formulated and delivered in a manner to evoke an immune response at mucosal surfaces. 'Thus, the immunogenic composition may be administered to mucosal surfaces by, for example, the nasal or oral (intagastric) routes.
Alternatively, other modes of administration including suppositories and oral formulations may be desirable.
For suppositories, binders and carriers may include, for example, polyalkalene glycols or triglycerides.
Such suppositories may be formed from mixtures containing the active immunogenic ingredients) in the range of about 10%, preferably about 1 to 2%. Oral formulations may include nornially employed carriers, such as, pharmaceutical grades of saccharine, cellulose and magnesium carbonate. These compositions can take the form of solutions, suspensions, tablets, pills, capsules, sustained release formulations or powders and contain about 1 to 95% of the active ingredients, preferably about 20 to 75%.
The immunogenic preparations and vaccines are administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation, and in such amount as will be therapeutically effective, immunogenic and protective.
The quantity to be administered depends on the subject to be treated, including, for example, the capacity of the individual's immune system to synthesize antibodies, and, if needed, to produce a cell-mediated immune response. Precise amount of active ingredients required to be administered depend on the lU
judgment of the practitioner. However, suitable dosage ranges axe readily deternvnable by one stalled in the art and may be of the order of micrograms to n~alligrams of the active ir~gredient(s) per vaccination.
Suitable regimes for initial administration and booster doses are also variable, but may include an initial administration followed by subsequent booster administrations. The dosage may also depend on the route of administration and will vary according to the size of the host.
The concentration of the active ingredients in an imrnunogenic composition according to the invention is in general about 1 to 95%. A vaccine which contains antigenic material of only one pathogen is a monovalent vaccine.
Irnminogenicity can be significantly improved if the antigens are co-administered with adjuvants.
Adjuvants enhance the immunogenicity of an antigen but are not necessarily immunogenic themselves.
Adjuvants may act by retaining the antigen locally near the site of administration to produce a depot effect facilitating a slow, sustained release of antigen to cells of the immune system. Adjuvants can also attract cells of the inunune system to an antigen depot and stimulate such cells to elicit immune responses.
Immunostimulatory agents or adjuvants have been used for may years to improve the host immune responses to, for example, vaccines. Intrinsic adjuvants, such as, lipopolysaccharides, normally are the components of the killed or attenuated bacteria used as vaccines.
Intrinsic adjuvants are imznunomodulators which are formulated to enhance the host immune responses.
Thus, adjuvants have been identified that enhance the immune responses to antigens delivered parentally. Some of these adjuvants are toxic, however, and can cause side effects, making them unsuitable for use in humans and many animals. Indeed, only aluminum hydroxide and aluminum ;phosphate (collectively commonly referred to as alum) are routinely used as adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines. The efficacy of alum in increasing antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids is well established. While the usefulness of alum is well established for some applications, it has limitations. For example, alum is ineffective for influenza vaccination and usually does not elicit a cell mediated immune response. The antibodies elicited by alum-adjuvanted antigens are mainly of the IgG~I
isotype ixa the mouse, which may not be optimal for protection by some vaccinal agents.
WO 02112289 PCT/CAt)1103108 A wide range of extrinsic adjuvants can provoke potent immune responses to antigens. These include saponins complexed to membrane protein antigens (immune stimulating complexes), plurorric polymers with mineral oil, killed mycobacteria in mineral oil, Freund's incomplete adjuvant, bacterial products, such as, muramyl dipeptide (MOP) and lipopolysacchar~:de {LPS), as well as lipid A, and liposomes.
To efficiently induce humoral responses (II1R) and cell-mediated immunity (CMIj, innnunogens are often emulsified in adjuvant~. Many adjuvants are toxic, including granulomas, acute and chrnnic inflanunations (Freuud's complete adjuvant, FCA), cytolysis (saponins and 1'luonic polymers) and pyrogenicity, arthritis and anterior uveitis (LPS and MOP). Although FCA is an excellent adjuvant and widely used in research, it is not licensed for use in human or veterinary vaccines because of its toxicity.
EXAMPLES
The above disclosure generally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific Examples. T'.hese Examples are described solely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Changes in form and substitution of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances rnay suggest or render expedient. Although specific terms have been employed herein, such terms are intended in a descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
Example 1:
This Example illustrates how the irnmunogens used herein may be isolated and purified from paramyxoviruses like Respiratory Syncytial Virus. In the case of Respiratory Syncytial Virus, as described in patents USA No. 08/679,060 and CVO 98/02457, the virus is groom on a vaccine quality cell line such as VERO eclls and on human diploid cells such as MRCS and W138 and then harvested Fetal 2S bovine serum (FBS) and trypsin may effect fermentation.
The viral harvest is filtered and then concentrated, typically using tangential flow ultrafiltration with a membrane of desired molecular weight cut-off, and diafiltered. The virus harvest concentrate may be centrifuged and the supernatant discarded. The pellet following centrifugation rnay be washed with a buffer containing urea to remove salubie eontaminartts while leaving the F, G
and M proteins WO 02/12289 pCT/CA01/O1a08 substantially unaffected, and the resulting material then may be recentrifuged. The pellet from the centrifugation then is detergent extracted to solubili~e the F, G and M
proteins from the pellet. Such detergent extraction may be effected by resuspending the pellet to the original harvest concentrate volume in an extraction buffer. Such a buffer would be a detergent, like TRTTOhITM X-100, a non-ionic detergent which is octadienyl phenol (ethylene glycol) 10. Other detergents include octylglucoside and Mega detergents.
Following centrifugation to remove non-soluble proteins, ~tha F, G and M
protein extract is purified by chromatographic procedures. The extract may first be applied to an ion exchange chromatography matrix to permit binding of the F, G and M -proteins to the matrix while impurities are permitted to flow through the column. Although the ion-exchange chromatography matrix may be any desired chromatography material, materials with a calcium phosphate matrix., specifically hydroxyapatite, were found to work well. DfiAE and TMAE were commonly used in these protocols.
The bound F, G
and M proteins then are coeluted from the column by a suitable eluant. The resulting copurified F, G and M proteins may be further processed to increase the purity thereof. The purified F, G and M proteins employed herein may be in the form of homo and hetero oligomers including F:G
heterodimers and including dimers, tetrarners and higher species. The Respiratory Syncytial Virus protein preparations prepared following this procedure demonstrated no evidence of any adventitious agent, hemadsorbing agent or live virus.
Example 2:
This Example illustrates the formulation of ixnxnunogens.
Initial screening experiments were performed on non-adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, with promising formulations applied to subsequent studies using Respiratory Syncytial Virus A, also non adjuvanted. Similar activity profiles were observed for all formulations tested on both Respiratory Syncytial Virus A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus B. Samples were diluted to approximately 240 p,glmi Respiratory Syncytial Virus A protein mixture, divided into formulation lots and then combined with an equal volume of formulation stock solution containing the excipient at twice the final concentration.
WO 02/12289 1'C'T/C'A01101108 Examine 3:
This Example illustrate measurement of stability for the various formulations.
Each formulation let was divided into aliquots of approximately 0.5 ml, and these samples were incubated at various temperatures (-70°C, 5°C, 25°C, 37°C, 45°C). ~iarnples were tested by SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and ELISA assay for the G, F, and M protein antigens at various time points, depending on the incubation temperature and duration of the study. Samples incubated at -70°C wore used as non-degraded reference standards in the above-mentioned assays.
SDS-PAGE was performed using pre-cast 12°l° polyacrylamide gels (I~Tovex). Protein bands were visualized either by direct Coomassie staining of the gels, or by electroblot transfer from the gel to a potyvinyldifluoride membrane (Millipore) and subsequent detection by Western blot. For the Western blot, the membrane was probed with a mixture of anti-F, -G, and 11~T primary ant!'bodies (lot #5353C75, #131-2G, and 197-F or their equivalents, respectively). Antigen ELISA analyses were performed using equivalent antibodies against F, G, and M proteins.
Screening was done using SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and ELISA to identify PEG-200 (1% and 5%, wiv} and sodium glutamate {MSG; 1 M and 0.1 M) as promising stabilizers for the M ELISA.
Subsequent experiments showed that 1 M MSG (17°I°, w/v) showed the best stabilization of the RSV M
protein, partially stabilizing M ELISA for 1 week at 37°C, and stabilizing at better than 80°/~ of controls for 8 weeks at 25°C (Fig. 2). Unformulated samples had zero M ELISA
activity under these conditions (Fig 1). Optimization experiments showed that a lower concentration (0.59 M;
10%, w/v) of MSG
achieved similar results (Fig3) , and that the effect was potentiated by the addition of S% (w/v) sucrose (Fig. 5). 1n addition to the observed stabilization of the M protein as assayed by ELISA, the stability of F
ELISA (Fig. 4), and of the F and M proteins (as judged by SDS-PAGE} was also improved by these formulations. The percentage of ELISA activity was measuxed in relation to samples stored at -70 C as control standards.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
In sumznaty of the disclosure, the present invention provides an antigenic preparation comprising at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate. The preparation may also contain other stabilizing agents.
W~ 02/122A9 PC;T~CAQ91~01I08 REFERENCES
1. Glezen, W.P., Paredes, A. Allison, .J.E,, Taber, L.H. and Frank, A.L.
(1981) . J. Pediatr. 98, 708-5 715.
2. Chanock, R.M., Parrot, R.H., Connors, M., Collies, P.L. and Murphy, B.R.
(I992). Pediatrics 90, I37-142.
3. Martha, A.J. Gardiner, P.S. and McQuillin, J. (1978). Lancel ii, 1035-1038.
4. Collies, P., McIntosh, K., and Chanock, R.M. in "Fields Virology" ed. by Fields, B.N., Knipe, 10 D.M., and Howley, P.M., Lippincott-Raven Press, New York, (1996 ) pp. 1313 -1351.
5. Melntosh, K. and Chanock, R.M. (1990) in Fields Virology (Fields, B.M., and Knipe, D.M. eds.) pp. 1045-1075, Raven Press, Ltd., New York.
Figure 2 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of 1M monosodium glutamate on the M ELhSA activity of the RSV preparation described in example 1 for at least eight weeks at 25°C.
Figure 3 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of monosodium glutamate compared to other stabilizers at maintaining RSV M ELISA activity for at least eight weeks at 25°C.
Figure 4 shows a graph demonstrating the stabilizing effect of 1 M sodium glutamate on RSV F
protein ELISA activity at 25 and 37° C
Figure 5 shows a graph demonstrating the M ELISA stability eff~t of 5% sucrose and 1D% MSG
at 25°C and 37°C.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF TNVENTION
Itnmunogens derived from paramyxoviruses are stabilized when combined with monosodium glutamate. The immunogens may be isolated and purified from paramyxoviruses like Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
Studies were initiated on RSV A non-adjuvanted vaccine because of an observation of a rapid loss of M protein antigen ELISA reactivity in stability studies at elevated temperature, and a gradual loss over time (6 months to 1 year) at 2-8°C. This loss of reactivity was not directly correlated with a loss of M protein (as judged by SDS PAGE and Western blot), and thus likely involved a change in protein conformation. The experiments show that the addition of monosodium. glutamate increases the stabilization of the M ELISA, F ELISA, and the F and M proteins as judged by SDS-PAGE.
WO 021122A9 PCTlCA01/Q1108 1. Vaccine Preparation and tTse Immunogenic compositions, suitable to be used as vaccines; may be prepared from mixtures comprising immunogenic F,G and M proteins of RSV. The immunogenic composition elicits an immune response which produces antibodies, including anti-I~.SV antibodies which are anti-F, anti-G and anti-M
antibodies.
Immunogenic compositions including vaccines may be prepared as injeetables, as liquid solutions, suspensions or emulsions. The active immunogenic ingredients may be mixed with pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, which are compatible therewith.
Such excipients may include water, saline, dextrose, glycerol, ethanol and combinations thereof.
The immunogenic compositions and vaccines may further contain a~zxiliary substances, such as, wetting or emulsifying agents, pH buffering agents, or adjuvants to enhance the effectiveness thereof Immunogenic compositions and vaccines may be administered parentally, by injection subcutaneous, intradermal or intramuscularly injection. Alternatively, the immunogenic compositions formulated according to the present invention, may be formulated and delivered in a manner to evoke an immune response at mucosal surfaces. 'Thus, the immunogenic composition may be administered to mucosal surfaces by, for example, the nasal or oral (intagastric) routes.
Alternatively, other modes of administration including suppositories and oral formulations may be desirable.
For suppositories, binders and carriers may include, for example, polyalkalene glycols or triglycerides.
Such suppositories may be formed from mixtures containing the active immunogenic ingredients) in the range of about 10%, preferably about 1 to 2%. Oral formulations may include nornially employed carriers, such as, pharmaceutical grades of saccharine, cellulose and magnesium carbonate. These compositions can take the form of solutions, suspensions, tablets, pills, capsules, sustained release formulations or powders and contain about 1 to 95% of the active ingredients, preferably about 20 to 75%.
The immunogenic preparations and vaccines are administered in a manner compatible with the dosage formulation, and in such amount as will be therapeutically effective, immunogenic and protective.
The quantity to be administered depends on the subject to be treated, including, for example, the capacity of the individual's immune system to synthesize antibodies, and, if needed, to produce a cell-mediated immune response. Precise amount of active ingredients required to be administered depend on the lU
judgment of the practitioner. However, suitable dosage ranges axe readily deternvnable by one stalled in the art and may be of the order of micrograms to n~alligrams of the active ir~gredient(s) per vaccination.
Suitable regimes for initial administration and booster doses are also variable, but may include an initial administration followed by subsequent booster administrations. The dosage may also depend on the route of administration and will vary according to the size of the host.
The concentration of the active ingredients in an imrnunogenic composition according to the invention is in general about 1 to 95%. A vaccine which contains antigenic material of only one pathogen is a monovalent vaccine.
Irnminogenicity can be significantly improved if the antigens are co-administered with adjuvants.
Adjuvants enhance the immunogenicity of an antigen but are not necessarily immunogenic themselves.
Adjuvants may act by retaining the antigen locally near the site of administration to produce a depot effect facilitating a slow, sustained release of antigen to cells of the immune system. Adjuvants can also attract cells of the inunune system to an antigen depot and stimulate such cells to elicit immune responses.
Immunostimulatory agents or adjuvants have been used for may years to improve the host immune responses to, for example, vaccines. Intrinsic adjuvants, such as, lipopolysaccharides, normally are the components of the killed or attenuated bacteria used as vaccines.
Intrinsic adjuvants are imznunomodulators which are formulated to enhance the host immune responses.
Thus, adjuvants have been identified that enhance the immune responses to antigens delivered parentally. Some of these adjuvants are toxic, however, and can cause side effects, making them unsuitable for use in humans and many animals. Indeed, only aluminum hydroxide and aluminum ;phosphate (collectively commonly referred to as alum) are routinely used as adjuvants in human and veterinary vaccines. The efficacy of alum in increasing antibody responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids is well established. While the usefulness of alum is well established for some applications, it has limitations. For example, alum is ineffective for influenza vaccination and usually does not elicit a cell mediated immune response. The antibodies elicited by alum-adjuvanted antigens are mainly of the IgG~I
isotype ixa the mouse, which may not be optimal for protection by some vaccinal agents.
WO 02112289 PCT/CAt)1103108 A wide range of extrinsic adjuvants can provoke potent immune responses to antigens. These include saponins complexed to membrane protein antigens (immune stimulating complexes), plurorric polymers with mineral oil, killed mycobacteria in mineral oil, Freund's incomplete adjuvant, bacterial products, such as, muramyl dipeptide (MOP) and lipopolysacchar~:de {LPS), as well as lipid A, and liposomes.
To efficiently induce humoral responses (II1R) and cell-mediated immunity (CMIj, innnunogens are often emulsified in adjuvant~. Many adjuvants are toxic, including granulomas, acute and chrnnic inflanunations (Freuud's complete adjuvant, FCA), cytolysis (saponins and 1'luonic polymers) and pyrogenicity, arthritis and anterior uveitis (LPS and MOP). Although FCA is an excellent adjuvant and widely used in research, it is not licensed for use in human or veterinary vaccines because of its toxicity.
EXAMPLES
The above disclosure generally describes the present invention. A more complete understanding can be obtained by reference to the following specific Examples. T'.hese Examples are described solely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Changes in form and substitution of equivalents are contemplated as circumstances rnay suggest or render expedient. Although specific terms have been employed herein, such terms are intended in a descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.
Example 1:
This Example illustrates how the irnmunogens used herein may be isolated and purified from paramyxoviruses like Respiratory Syncytial Virus. In the case of Respiratory Syncytial Virus, as described in patents USA No. 08/679,060 and CVO 98/02457, the virus is groom on a vaccine quality cell line such as VERO eclls and on human diploid cells such as MRCS and W138 and then harvested Fetal 2S bovine serum (FBS) and trypsin may effect fermentation.
The viral harvest is filtered and then concentrated, typically using tangential flow ultrafiltration with a membrane of desired molecular weight cut-off, and diafiltered. The virus harvest concentrate may be centrifuged and the supernatant discarded. The pellet following centrifugation rnay be washed with a buffer containing urea to remove salubie eontaminartts while leaving the F, G
and M proteins WO 02/12289 pCT/CA01/O1a08 substantially unaffected, and the resulting material then may be recentrifuged. The pellet from the centrifugation then is detergent extracted to solubili~e the F, G and M
proteins from the pellet. Such detergent extraction may be effected by resuspending the pellet to the original harvest concentrate volume in an extraction buffer. Such a buffer would be a detergent, like TRTTOhITM X-100, a non-ionic detergent which is octadienyl phenol (ethylene glycol) 10. Other detergents include octylglucoside and Mega detergents.
Following centrifugation to remove non-soluble proteins, ~tha F, G and M
protein extract is purified by chromatographic procedures. The extract may first be applied to an ion exchange chromatography matrix to permit binding of the F, G and M -proteins to the matrix while impurities are permitted to flow through the column. Although the ion-exchange chromatography matrix may be any desired chromatography material, materials with a calcium phosphate matrix., specifically hydroxyapatite, were found to work well. DfiAE and TMAE were commonly used in these protocols.
The bound F, G
and M proteins then are coeluted from the column by a suitable eluant. The resulting copurified F, G and M proteins may be further processed to increase the purity thereof. The purified F, G and M proteins employed herein may be in the form of homo and hetero oligomers including F:G
heterodimers and including dimers, tetrarners and higher species. The Respiratory Syncytial Virus protein preparations prepared following this procedure demonstrated no evidence of any adventitious agent, hemadsorbing agent or live virus.
Example 2:
This Example illustrates the formulation of ixnxnunogens.
Initial screening experiments were performed on non-adjuvanted Respiratory Syncytial Virus B, with promising formulations applied to subsequent studies using Respiratory Syncytial Virus A, also non adjuvanted. Similar activity profiles were observed for all formulations tested on both Respiratory Syncytial Virus A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus B. Samples were diluted to approximately 240 p,glmi Respiratory Syncytial Virus A protein mixture, divided into formulation lots and then combined with an equal volume of formulation stock solution containing the excipient at twice the final concentration.
WO 02/12289 1'C'T/C'A01101108 Examine 3:
This Example illustrate measurement of stability for the various formulations.
Each formulation let was divided into aliquots of approximately 0.5 ml, and these samples were incubated at various temperatures (-70°C, 5°C, 25°C, 37°C, 45°C). ~iarnples were tested by SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and ELISA assay for the G, F, and M protein antigens at various time points, depending on the incubation temperature and duration of the study. Samples incubated at -70°C wore used as non-degraded reference standards in the above-mentioned assays.
SDS-PAGE was performed using pre-cast 12°l° polyacrylamide gels (I~Tovex). Protein bands were visualized either by direct Coomassie staining of the gels, or by electroblot transfer from the gel to a potyvinyldifluoride membrane (Millipore) and subsequent detection by Western blot. For the Western blot, the membrane was probed with a mixture of anti-F, -G, and 11~T primary ant!'bodies (lot #5353C75, #131-2G, and 197-F or their equivalents, respectively). Antigen ELISA analyses were performed using equivalent antibodies against F, G, and M proteins.
Screening was done using SDS-PAGE, Western blot, and ELISA to identify PEG-200 (1% and 5%, wiv} and sodium glutamate {MSG; 1 M and 0.1 M) as promising stabilizers for the M ELISA.
Subsequent experiments showed that 1 M MSG (17°I°, w/v) showed the best stabilization of the RSV M
protein, partially stabilizing M ELISA for 1 week at 37°C, and stabilizing at better than 80°/~ of controls for 8 weeks at 25°C (Fig. 2). Unformulated samples had zero M ELISA
activity under these conditions (Fig 1). Optimization experiments showed that a lower concentration (0.59 M;
10%, w/v) of MSG
achieved similar results (Fig3) , and that the effect was potentiated by the addition of S% (w/v) sucrose (Fig. 5). 1n addition to the observed stabilization of the M protein as assayed by ELISA, the stability of F
ELISA (Fig. 4), and of the F and M proteins (as judged by SDS-PAGE} was also improved by these formulations. The percentage of ELISA activity was measuxed in relation to samples stored at -70 C as control standards.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
In sumznaty of the disclosure, the present invention provides an antigenic preparation comprising at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate. The preparation may also contain other stabilizing agents.
W~ 02/122A9 PC;T~CAQ91~01I08 REFERENCES
1. Glezen, W.P., Paredes, A. Allison, .J.E,, Taber, L.H. and Frank, A.L.
(1981) . J. Pediatr. 98, 708-5 715.
2. Chanock, R.M., Parrot, R.H., Connors, M., Collies, P.L. and Murphy, B.R.
(I992). Pediatrics 90, I37-142.
3. Martha, A.J. Gardiner, P.S. and McQuillin, J. (1978). Lancel ii, 1035-1038.
4. Collies, P., McIntosh, K., and Chanock, R.M. in "Fields Virology" ed. by Fields, B.N., Knipe, 10 D.M., and Howley, P.M., Lippincott-Raven Press, New York, (1996 ) pp. 1313 -1351.
5. Melntosh, K. and Chanock, R.M. (1990) in Fields Virology (Fields, B.M., and Knipe, D.M. eds.) pp. 1045-1075, Raven Press, Ltd., New York.
6. Glezen, W.P., Taber, L.H., Frank, A.L. and Kasel, 3.A. (1986) Am. J. Dis.
Child. I4.0, 143-I46.
Child. I4.0, 143-I46.
7. Katz, S.L. New vaccine development establishing priorities. Vol. 1.
Washington: National I5 Academic Press. (1985) pp. 397-409.
Washington: National I5 Academic Press. (1985) pp. 397-409.
8. Wertz, G.W., Sullender, yi~.M. (1992) Biotech. 20, 151-I76.
9. Bobbins, A,, and Freeman, P. (1988) Sci. Am. 259, I26-133.
10. Murry AR, Dowell SF, 1997. Respiratory syncytial virus: not,)ust far kids.
Hosp. Pxact. (Off Ed) 1997 Jul. 15; 32(7): 87-8, 9I-4.
l I. Mlinarie-Galinovic G, Falsey AR, Welsh EE, 1996. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in the elderly. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis I 996.
12. Welsh, E.E., HaII, C.B., Briselli, M., Brandies, M.W, and SchIesinger, J.J. (1987) J. Infect. Dis.
P55, 1198-1204.
13. Welsh, E.E., Hruska, J. (1983) J. Virol. 47, 171-177.
14. Levine, S., Kleiber-France, R., and Paradiso, P.R. (1987) J. Gee. Viroh 69, 2521-2524.
15. Anderson, L.J. Hierholzer, J.C., Tsou, C., Hendry, R.M., Femie, B.F., Stone, Y. and Malntosh, K.
(1985), J. Infect. Dis. 151, 626-633.
16. Johnson, P.R., Olmsted, R.A., Prince, G.A., Murphy, B.R., Alling, D.W., Welsh, E.E. and Collies, P.L. (1987) J. Virol. 61 (10), 3163-3166.
17. Cherrie, A.H., Anderson, K., Wertz, G.W., and Openshaw, P.J.M. (1992) J.
Virology 66, 2102-2110.
18. Ahem, Tim J. and Manning, Mark C. (I992) Stability of Protein Pharmaceuticals, x.
19. Kim, H.W., Canchola, J.G., Brandt, C.D., Pyles, G., Chanock, R.M. Jensen, K., and Parrott, R.H.
(1969) Amen J. Epidemiology 89, 422-434.
20. Firedewald, W.T., Forsyth, B.R., Smith, C.B., Gharpure, M.S., and Chanock, R.M. (I968) JAMA
204, 690-694.
21. Welsh, E.E., Brandriss, M.W., Schlesinger, J.J. (1985) J, Gen. V'irol. 66, 409-415.
22. Walsh, E.E., Schlesinger, J.J, and Brandriss, M.W. (I984) J. Gen. Tirol.
65, 761-766.
23. Routledge, E.G., Willcocks, M.M., Samson, A.C.R., Morgan, L., Scott, R., Anderson, J.J., and Torns, G.L. (1988) J. Gen. ~Jirology 69, 293-303.
24. Fulginiti, V.A., Eller, J.J., Sieber, O.E., Joyner,1.W., Minamitani, M.
and Meiklejohn, G. (1969) Am J. Epidemiol. 89 (4), 435-448.
Hosp. Pxact. (Off Ed) 1997 Jul. 15; 32(7): 87-8, 9I-4.
l I. Mlinarie-Galinovic G, Falsey AR, Welsh EE, 1996. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in the elderly. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis I 996.
12. Welsh, E.E., HaII, C.B., Briselli, M., Brandies, M.W, and SchIesinger, J.J. (1987) J. Infect. Dis.
P55, 1198-1204.
13. Welsh, E.E., Hruska, J. (1983) J. Virol. 47, 171-177.
14. Levine, S., Kleiber-France, R., and Paradiso, P.R. (1987) J. Gee. Viroh 69, 2521-2524.
15. Anderson, L.J. Hierholzer, J.C., Tsou, C., Hendry, R.M., Femie, B.F., Stone, Y. and Malntosh, K.
(1985), J. Infect. Dis. 151, 626-633.
16. Johnson, P.R., Olmsted, R.A., Prince, G.A., Murphy, B.R., Alling, D.W., Welsh, E.E. and Collies, P.L. (1987) J. Virol. 61 (10), 3163-3166.
17. Cherrie, A.H., Anderson, K., Wertz, G.W., and Openshaw, P.J.M. (1992) J.
Virology 66, 2102-2110.
18. Ahem, Tim J. and Manning, Mark C. (I992) Stability of Protein Pharmaceuticals, x.
19. Kim, H.W., Canchola, J.G., Brandt, C.D., Pyles, G., Chanock, R.M. Jensen, K., and Parrott, R.H.
(1969) Amen J. Epidemiology 89, 422-434.
20. Firedewald, W.T., Forsyth, B.R., Smith, C.B., Gharpure, M.S., and Chanock, R.M. (I968) JAMA
204, 690-694.
21. Welsh, E.E., Brandriss, M.W., Schlesinger, J.J. (1985) J, Gen. V'irol. 66, 409-415.
22. Walsh, E.E., Schlesinger, J.J, and Brandriss, M.W. (I984) J. Gen. Tirol.
65, 761-766.
23. Routledge, E.G., Willcocks, M.M., Samson, A.C.R., Morgan, L., Scott, R., Anderson, J.J., and Torns, G.L. (1988) J. Gen. ~Jirology 69, 293-303.
24. Fulginiti, V.A., Eller, J.J., Sieber, O.E., Joyner,1.W., Minamitani, M.
and Meiklejohn, G. (1969) Am J. Epidemiol. 89 (4), 435-448.
Claims (19)
1. An antigenic preparation comprising at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor.
2. The antigenic preparation of claim 1 wherein the paramyxovirus is Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
3. The antigenic preparation of claim 1 wherein the concentration of monosodium glutamate is about between 0.12 and 20% wt/v.
4. The antigenic preparation of claim 2 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (M) protein.
5. The antigenic preparation of claim 1 wherein the at least one immunogen is purified.
6. The antigenic preparation of claim 1 further comprising sucrose.
7. The antigenic preparation of claim 2 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is of type A or B.
8. The antigenic preparation of claim 1 formulated as a vaccine for protection against disease caused by paramyxoviruses.
9. A method for preparation of a vaccine comprising the steps of combining at least one immunogen derived from a paramyxovirus and a predetermined concentration of monosodium glutamate as a stabilizer therefor.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the paramyxovirus is Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
11. The method of claim 9 wherein the concentration of monosodium glutamate is about between 0.12 and 20% wt/v.
12. The method of claim 10 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is selected from the group consisting of fusion (F) protein, attachment (G) protein, and matrix (M) protein.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is purified.
14. The method of claim 9 further comprising sucrose.
15. The method of claim 10 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is of type A or B.
16. A method for immunization comprising administering the vaccine of claim 8 to a host.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the paramyxovirus is Respiratory Syncytial Virus.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein the host is human.
19. The method of claim 17 wherein the at least one Respiratory Syncytial Virus immunogen is type A or B.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US23342300P | 2000-08-07 | 2000-08-07 | |
US60/233,423 | 2000-08-07 | ||
CA002418939A CA2418939A1 (en) | 2000-08-07 | 2001-08-02 | Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002418939A Division CA2418939A1 (en) | 2000-08-07 | 2001-08-02 | Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2432423A1 true CA2432423A1 (en) | 2002-02-14 |
Family
ID=28455386
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002432423A Abandoned CA2432423A1 (en) | 2000-08-07 | 2001-08-02 | Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2432423A1 (en) |
-
2001
- 2001-08-02 CA CA002432423A patent/CA2432423A1/en not_active Abandoned
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2433502A1 (en) | Acellular pertussis vaccines and methods of preparation thereof | |
EP0942928B2 (en) | Subunit respiratory syncytial virus vaccine preparation | |
EP1651264B1 (en) | Subunit vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus infection | |
AU712213B2 (en) | Parainfluenza virus glycoproteins and vaccines | |
KR101026053B1 (en) | Virosome-like-particles | |
US7169395B1 (en) | Multivalent immunogenic composition containing RSV subunit composition and influenza virus preparation | |
AU2009270399A1 (en) | Chimeric respiratory syncytial virus polypeptide antigens | |
EP2058002A1 (en) | Reconstituted respiratory syncytial virus membranes and use as respiratory syncytial virus vaccine | |
US20040022800A1 (en) | Respiratory syncytial virus vaccine | |
US20040052800A1 (en) | Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses | |
US7083795B1 (en) | Inactivated respiratory syncytial viral vaccines | |
CA2432423A1 (en) | Stabilization of immunogens derived from paramyxoviruses | |
US20050089525A1 (en) | Subunit respiratory syncytial virus vaccine preparation | |
AU732951B2 (en) | Parainfluenza virus glycoproteins and vaccines | |
AU718025B2 (en) | Parainfluenza virus glycoproteins and vaccines | |
DE60219021T2 (en) | Immunogenic compositions containing an antigen and an M protein of the respiratory syncytial virus | |
AU2002325713A1 (en) | Subunit respiratory syncytial virus vaccine preparation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Dead |