CA1174864A - Method of pressurizing and stabilizing rock by periodic and repeated injections of a settable fluid of finite gel strength - Google Patents
Method of pressurizing and stabilizing rock by periodic and repeated injections of a settable fluid of finite gel strengthInfo
- Publication number
- CA1174864A CA1174864A CA000383054A CA383054A CA1174864A CA 1174864 A CA1174864 A CA 1174864A CA 000383054 A CA000383054 A CA 000383054A CA 383054 A CA383054 A CA 383054A CA 1174864 A CA1174864 A CA 1174864A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- gel
- stress
- volume
- injection
- underground
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 27
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 title abstract description 38
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 title abstract description 3
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 title 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 9
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 41
- 239000011440 grout Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004519 grease Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 239000004570 mortar (masonry) Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011505 plaster Substances 0.000 description 2
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000004593 Epoxy Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052925 anhydrite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003197 catalytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002301 combined effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012407 engineering method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000000379 polymerizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005309 stochastic process Methods 0.000 description 1
- CCEKAJIANROZEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulfluramid Chemical group CCNS(=O)(=O)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)C(F)(F)F CCEKAJIANROZEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02D—FOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
- E02D3/00—Improving or preserving soil or rock, e.g. preserving permafrost soil
- E02D3/12—Consolidating by placing solidifying or pore-filling substances in the soil
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/13—Methods or devices for cementing, for plugging holes, crevices or the like
- E21B33/138—Plastering the borehole wall; Injecting into the formation
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21C—MINING OR QUARRYING
- E21C37/00—Other methods or devices for dislodging with or without loading
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21D—SHAFTS; TUNNELS; GALLERIES; LARGE UNDERGROUND CHAMBERS
- E21D9/00—Tunnels or galleries, with or without linings; Methods or apparatus for making thereof; Layout of tunnels or galleries
- E21D9/001—Improving soil or rock, e.g. by freezing; Injections
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Soil Sciences (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Paleontology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Agronomy & Crop Science (AREA)
- Consolidation Of Soil By Introduction Of Solidifying Substances Into Soil (AREA)
- Lining And Supports For Tunnels (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A finite region of overpressure can be created in solid underground formations by the periodic injection of a fluid that has finite gel strength that subsequently, after each injection, partially sets - i.e., equivalently becomes a very much stronger gel. A region of overpressure is a region in which the static, locked in pressure is larger than what was there before. A region of overpressure can be used to prevent a roof of a tunnel from caving by adding compressive stresses in the roof. A sequence of regions of overpressure can be used to lift an arch or dome underground, squeeze off water or gas flows, stabilize dams, foundations, large underground rooms, etc. In general, the stress or pressure distribution in rock can be altered and engineered in a fashion that is more advantageous than what would have been the case without over-stressing.
A finite region of overpressure can be created in solid underground formations by the periodic injection of a fluid that has finite gel strength that subsequently, after each injection, partially sets - i.e., equivalently becomes a very much stronger gel. A region of overpressure is a region in which the static, locked in pressure is larger than what was there before. A region of overpressure can be used to prevent a roof of a tunnel from caving by adding compressive stresses in the roof. A sequence of regions of overpressure can be used to lift an arch or dome underground, squeeze off water or gas flows, stabilize dams, foundations, large underground rooms, etc. In general, the stress or pressure distribution in rock can be altered and engineered in a fashion that is more advantageous than what would have been the case without over-stressing.
Description
~174~364 SPECIFICATION
Stirling A. Colgate U. S. Patent No. 3,616,855 describes a method of creating a region of overpressure in an underground formation by pumpina a settable fluid at high pressure into the formation at the point where the overpressure is desired. The fluid fractures the rock if the pressure is great enough and fills the crack. A period of static hold allows the -luid to set to a stronger solid. The normal st.ess in the fracture is increased because of the added volume. A
subsequent fracture may or may not reopen the original fracture.
If it reopens the original one, tben the new added volume will further increase the normal stress and make the subsequent fracture more difficult until after some cumulative increment of stress, the fluid finds and fractures a new direction until it too has increased in stress to where either a still different 13 direction is fractured, or the original one is fractured again.
In this fashion, the fractures find the weakest point or direction; then the injected fluid increments the stress and ' : ~
, ~4168 thus converts the weak point into a strong one. This stochastic process will find and fill fractures in all directions from the injection point. The weakest direction is turned into the strongest, and a new weakest one is found.
S A volcano mountain is for,med in the same fashion where each lava flow that breaks out the sides tur,ns the last weak point into a stronger point by locking in the stress created by the fracture, flow and solidification of the lava.
.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Theoretical and ex,perimental research relating to the underground stress engineering method of the Colgate patent has led to a more complete understanding of~ method that enables, in accordance with the present invention, a selected overstress to be created in a selected volume.
The improved method is based upon the discovery of the relationships between the gel strength of the settable fluid, the bulk modulus of the rock in the formation to be , stressed and the volume of the fluid pumped into the formation in each injection.
1) The increment of pressure (~P) added by each injection is approximately equal to the square root of the gel strength (Gs) of the fluid times the bulk modulus (B) of the rock;
i.e., Ap ~ (G5B) 1/2
Stirling A. Colgate U. S. Patent No. 3,616,855 describes a method of creating a region of overpressure in an underground formation by pumpina a settable fluid at high pressure into the formation at the point where the overpressure is desired. The fluid fractures the rock if the pressure is great enough and fills the crack. A period of static hold allows the -luid to set to a stronger solid. The normal st.ess in the fracture is increased because of the added volume. A
subsequent fracture may or may not reopen the original fracture.
If it reopens the original one, tben the new added volume will further increase the normal stress and make the subsequent fracture more difficult until after some cumulative increment of stress, the fluid finds and fractures a new direction until it too has increased in stress to where either a still different 13 direction is fractured, or the original one is fractured again.
In this fashion, the fractures find the weakest point or direction; then the injected fluid increments the stress and ' : ~
, ~4168 thus converts the weak point into a strong one. This stochastic process will find and fill fractures in all directions from the injection point. The weakest direction is turned into the strongest, and a new weakest one is found.
S A volcano mountain is for,med in the same fashion where each lava flow that breaks out the sides tur,ns the last weak point into a stronger point by locking in the stress created by the fracture, flow and solidification of the lava.
.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Theoretical and ex,perimental research relating to the underground stress engineering method of the Colgate patent has led to a more complete understanding of~ method that enables, in accordance with the present invention, a selected overstress to be created in a selected volume.
The improved method is based upon the discovery of the relationships between the gel strength of the settable fluid, the bulk modulus of the rock in the formation to be , stressed and the volume of the fluid pumped into the formation in each injection.
1) The increment of pressure (~P) added by each injection is approximately equal to the square root of the gel strength (Gs) of the fluid times the bulk modulus (B) of the rock;
i.e., Ap ~ (G5B) 1/2
2) The total volume (V) of settable fluid to be pumped into the formation is equal to the volume of rock to be overstressed times the overstress desired (~Pt~t) divided 1 174~364 by the bulk modulus (B) of the rock. (The volume of the overstressed rock can be considered as a spherical mass having a radius equal to the extent of excursion of the crack fsom the place of injection of the fluid, which can be termed the half crack length (L), and a length roughly equal to the radius. Therefore, the overstressed volume of rock is equal to 4~ L 3/3-) i e V ~ 3 ~L3~P /B
From the relationships described above, the gel strength and the~volume of the setting fluid to be iniected into the formation to obtain a desired overstress in a desired volume of rock can be determined. In particular, a gel is selected which has a gel strength approximately equal to the square of the desired stress increase diYided by the bulk modulus of the rock. The volume of gel pumped into the rock in each injection is roughly equal to L3(2G /B)~
The number of injec,ions of gel into the rock to produce a selected total overstress ~S) in a volume of about ~13 is roughly equal to 35/(GsB) ~2 .
The improved method, according to the present invention, can be used to alter and engineer the stress or pressure distribution in rock over an underground room or tunnel, to squeeze off water or gas flow in rock, to lift an arch or dome undersround and stabilize a building foundation, just to name a few examples.
In the more detailed description of the invention and some examples of its use, reference is made to the accompanyins drawings.
~7~864 DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Eig. 1 is 2 diagram depicting 2 crack formed by injecting settable fluid into an underground formation;
~ ig. 2 is a pictorial illustration of the use of the method in pressurizing the roof of a tunnel to keep it from caving; and Fig. 3 illustrates a use of the method to overstress ; several regions to producè an arch or dome underground.
MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION O~ T~E MET~OD
Fracturin~ With a Gel The property of a gel that is unique for creating a stress is its finite resistance to flow at zero velocity.
t~eslstance to flow at finite velocity is described by viscosity.) Thus, a stress in a gel can be "locked-in" by allowing the gel to "set~ after a finite time in a static condition. Typical examples are special grouts or catalytic polymerizing plastics. If a gel is forced into a channel of width W and length L, and arbitrarily large depth, then the pressure drop will be inversely proportional to the width, ~ 20 and proportional to both the length znd gel strength G. Thus the pressure drop becomas:
.
~ p = 2 Gs L/W. ~ tl This assumes that the flow is laminar, which is a good assumption because the equivalent viscosity is large and the 2~ A flow velocity is small. G5is a measure o' the shear strength of the gel and typically may be 10 2 to 1 PSI for useful a~plication to stress engineering. ~or example, the familiar food gelatin has a gel strength of roughly 1 PSI.
~1'74~364 If the channel of the above example (equation 1) is a fracture, ,hen the pressure drop due to the injection of the gel will be exerted on the walls of the fracture and tend to push apart the fracture and widen the channel. The relationship between this widening of the channel and the properties of the gel,rock formation, and fracture aIe the key to stress engineering.
A fracture is show~ in Figu e 1 as viewed in the direction of a bore hole 10. The fracture 12 extends symmetrically either side of the bore hole to a half length L
and to an arbltrary depth (into the paper) a distance larger than L. Thus, a semi-infinite cylindrical geometry is described.
Compressive stress is induced in the formation because of the width of the fracture. The formation is compressed in the orthogonal direction to the plane of the fracture. The region effected by the compression created by the fracture will have the same cylindrical geometry (shown by phantom lines 14) and will roughly extend a radial distance corresponding to the crack hal.
length-L. Thus, if we a?proximate the fractuse as a channel of constant width W, outlined by the dashed curve in ~igure 1, then the volume of the fracture, 2 L W per unit dep~h, is distributed as compressive stress in roughly a volume ~L2 per unit depth. ~hus, if this added volume creates only compressive stress, the increment of pressure in the fracture will be ~P - (volume added) (Bulk modulus) _ 2 L W B = W B (2 volume effected ~L2 ~L
11'74~64 where B is the bulk modulus. This is, of course, a gross approximation; real fractures have a more complicated shape determined by the rock strength that is described below. In addition, the pressure in the fracture or channel is an increment of pressure rather than an absolute value. In a real case, the fracture is formed underground where there exists a static in situ pressure, usua~ly the ~overburden"
pressure corresponding to the depth. This overburden pressure adds to the fracture pressure; hence the pressure added by the fracture is an increment of pressure.
If the fracture is made by pumping a gel at high pressure, then the pressure increment of equation 1 will hold open a fracture that has a normal stress described by equation 2.
If equations 1 and 2 are e~uated, one obtains W/~ (~ Gs/B) ~P - 2 Gs B/~ = 1.13 (Gs B) / (3 These relations state that both the length to width ratio of a fracture as well as the increment of pressure created are both a constant independent of the volume of gel pumped into the fracture. This means that provided the gel strength and bulk modulus are constant, then the increment of pressure is a constant no matter how much gel is pumped. It is only when the gel sets to a solid that a new injection of gel will create a new fracture, thus adding an increment to the previous pxessure.
Experimentation In some experimental work, 1/2 gallon to i gallon guantities of a finite gel strength grout (Gs= 2/10 PSI~ were pumped 1~74~364 into formations in a mine. Over many grout injections, the random incremental increase in the fracture pressure climbed roughly 500 to 5,000 psi per injection. If the bulk modulus is the average value 2 x 106 psi for hard rock, then from equation 3, ~P ~ 600 psi. Furthermore, once injection started in a new fracture, the pressure would very seldom increase and more often decrease as the pumping continued. The decrease can be explained by either a new fracture direction or a fracture and flow opening up into regions beyond tlarger L) those originally stressed and hence at a lower ambient stress.
These experiments are strong evidence of the behavior descri~ed by equation 3. Both the increments of pressure occurred as expected, and this increment of pressure was independent of volume pumped, provided the volume was not significantly larger than the previous injection.
Procedure for Creating an Overstressed Region One initially derines the region to be overstressed as extending some dimensibn ~ dependent upon the use. One further defines the overstress desired as some maximum value, ~Ptot~
~where this may be some multiple of the overburden pressure and or the rock strength. In general, the stress needed to hold the roof of a tunnel or dri~t is small, say one to several x 103 psi.
On the other hand, squeezing off a deep mine water flow or geo-pressurized brines may require 10 x this value. Then the total volume of gel or grout to be added becomes ~ Volume = (Volume ove_stressed)QPtot -3 ~L3~Ptot/B. (4 241~8 ~7~864 Ideally, one would like to create this overstress from three mutually perpendicular fractures, but in a real case the rock strength and heterogeneity would cause this to be unlikely. ~ence, the formation should be fractured with roughly at least twice this number of injections - say six -so that there is a reasonable chance of the fractures exploring most directions. The volume pumped with each injection should then be ~~ Vol/6. Since some of these fractures will be in the same direction as the previous one, the average increment of pressure created per injection will be about ~Ptot/3. The required gel strength is then determined using equation 3. If such a gel can be made and pumped, it is what is used. I~ the ~Ptot = 2000 ~SI, and B - 2 x 106 PSI, for example, the required gel strength is z 1/8 PSI, a value similar to a soft grease. Air operated grease lS pumps are available for pumping such a gel, and such pumps were used in the mine tests described above. An increment of pressure of a~ average of about 350 PSI per injection is expected, bu, some fractured at 700 PSI and some near zero. Averaged over six injections, an overpressure of ~Ptot ~ 2000 PSI should result.
The volume to be pumped per injection is then ~Vol~6, from equation 4. If the bulk modulus were smaller, or the desired ~Ptot larger, then a larger volume would have to be pumped in a larger number of injections. Similarly, a weaker gel would require a larger number of injections of smaller volume each.
Practical Volumes In drifting a tunnel to overstress the heading so that following eacn round an overpressure in the roo~ is created .a~7~6~
to prevent ca~ing, then it is worthwhile to evaluate the economics of overstressing versus some other safety features like cribbing or rock bolting. For example, suppose a 20 foot diameter heading is being run, making 15 feet per round. The stressing method involves drilling ahead by the round depth (15 feet) slightly above the roof level and overstressing to roughly 2000 PSI. This ensures a compressi~e stress greater ; than the tensile strength of the rock and so ensures a residual of primarily compressive stresses. This is .he optimum safe stress distribution in a roof. The hole 2D i~ drill~ t~ a dePth somewhat greater (say a foot) than the round depth, and a packer 22 is set to the depth of the round, 15 feet. The spherical region to be overstressed should be roughly the size of the drift, or 20 feet. The volume of rock affected is thus (4/3) ~ r3~ 4000 ft3-lS The increment of volume to be added becomes Vol = Volume x ~Ptot = 4 ft3. This is only four sacks of cement and is a trivialexpense in supplies compared to the labor and materials to advance - such a drift. The elaDsed time required to inject the grout is roughly six times the gel setting time ~six injections with setting times between them). The pumping time for each injection of 2/3 cubic feet (~ 5 gallons) is at most one minute, requiring 5 HP. If the pre-set time for the gel is ten times the pumping time, or 10 minutes per injection, the overstressing operation takes roushly an hour. The round can then be drilled and blasted immediately after stressing, because the grout will be urther set and the transient stress of blasting is short enough in duration so that the set grout will not be squeezed out.
il7~6~
The cost overhead of an hour is small compared to that required for cribbing which is roughly 1/2 to 1 times the labor required for a round and an additional equal cost for materials.
Embodiment of ~verstressing a Tunnel A typical ~hodiment of overstress for a mine or transportation tunnel is shown in Figure 2 and is described above. Consider a typical tunnel of 10 feet (3.3 meters) diameter. The depth underground is not important to the technique assuming only that it is less than typical mines or tunnels of 10,000 feet or 3 kilometers. Down to this depth most rock is stronq in compression compared to overbusden pressure, 1000 PSI, and so overstressing just serves to lock in the roc~s of the tunnel and does not attempt to distribute the compressive loads to a larger area (as would also be possi~le).
To lock in the rock surrounding the tunnel requires a pressure increase of only several thousand ~SI, that is, enough additional compression in the rock such as to ensure that no single rock can be likely supported in tension (since the tensile strength of rock rarely exceeds 2,000 PSI). A rock that is supported in tension can always be prone to collapse - i.e., fall -because of fracture. A rock in compression is held in place regardless of fractures. Tnat is, the mortar between the stones of a Roman arch does not support the arch; compressive stresses support the arch regardless of the mortar or any other presumed tensile strength.
~174864 In the tunnel the hole 20 is drilled and an injection pipe 24 set ahead and slightly above or at the level of the new tunnel roof. The depth of the hole is roughly the tunnel dizmeter - which is 10 feet (3 meters) in this case.
The packer 22 is set around the injection pipe 24 roughly 10 hole diameters from the end of the hole. The packer can be of any standard type; frequently the compression of a stack of rubber washers or the hydraulic inflation of a liner is used, or the pipe can be set in the rock with quick setting resins as is current roof bolting practice. ~he distance of packers from the hole botto~ is determined by the requirement to initially fracture the formation. If the length to diameter of the initial pressure region is large, i.e., 2 10 fold, then the anisotropy of the stresses (inside the uniform stress region depicted ~y 30)ensures that the hole will fracture if the fluid pressure is 2,000 to 4,000 PSI greater than the overburden pressure. The first fsacture is created by pumping water or oil by the same high pressure pump 26 that pumos the gel overstress fluid. The first fracture forms at a pressure (which can be read on the gauge 28) equal roughly to the overburden pressure plus some factor times the rock strength. Thus, if the tunnel is at, say, the 2,000 feet depth, then overburden pressu_e is 2,000 PSI and a fracture will form at 2,000 to 6,000 PSI
depending upon previous fractures. Once z fracture is formed, t~en the acceptance pressure of the 'racture 'luid will be overburden pressure. Then the fluid is changed to the over-pressure fluid of finite gel streng.h that will form the stress distribution outlined by the concentric circles 30.
~ 24168 1~7486~
A suitable settable fluid to use in the stress engi~eering method is a thick grout made up of 85~ neat cement, preferably the fast setting variety known as ~ y-Early which is a finer grind than normal cement. IA additiOn! 15%
5 plaster is used to give it gel properties. Calcium chloride up to 5~ can be added to speed up the setting time if needed.
Where the cement is mixed stochiametrically between the CaS04 plaster and the CaIII of the cement, it is known as ~Regulated Fill ~p ~ n a cement made by Dowell Corporation. The volume of cement or gel fluid to be pumped is determined by equation 4 with equation 5 substituted for ~P. That is, the volume of grout pumped in each injection becomes:
~ Vol ~ 4/3 ~ D3 (G /B)1/2 For typical thick grout, the gel strength Gs~ 1/10 PSI and the bulk modulus, ~ -2 x 106 PSI. The volume to be pumped becomes ~ ol - lo~3D3 ft3. Therefore, if the tunnel diameter is 10 feet and the overstressed region is the tunnel diameter, then each grout injection should be one cubic foot or 7.5 gallons. The period between injections should be 5 to 10 minutes, which is the typical time for such a grout to partially set. The . .
increment of pressure for each injec~ion will be(Gs~)l/2 ~ 450 PSI.
If the original tunnel was at a depth of say 2,000 feet; then the first injection of grout will be at roughly 2,500 PSI and progressively increases with each injection.
Of course, it must be recognized that previous fractures, altered stratigraphy and the like, will cause significant variations in the behavior outlined - like a factor of 2.
-~ 24168 ~17~864 If the ground is highly fractured, i.e., "bad" ground, then roughly double the number of injections will be required, and conversely rock that is geotechtonically prestressed will show an initial fracture pressure well above overburden pressure and the grout injection pressure will increase more rapidly.
Finally, there m2y be circumstances where a more ;rapid set time of the gel fluid is required than can be obtained by various grouts. In this case, the two co~ponent catalytically setting resins, such as epoxy or polystyrene, that are typically used to hold rock bolts in mines would be the preferred finite gel strength rapid setting fluid.
In the case of such a rapid set, it may be advantageous to use two pumps ~nd pipes, one for each component so that each resin component i5 separately injected into the end of the drill hole.
Mixing then takes place in the rock and not inside the reuseable equipment. The decision to use grout or two-component resin is mostly one of the cost of materials versus convenience. Grout is, of course, cheaper, but mixing, cleaning and waiting for a set is inconvenient. Resins are more expensive, but if mixing is achieved down hole, then no mixing equipment, cleaning or extrzneous holding period between injections is required.
Lifting of Underqround Domes A dome or arch-shaped cavern can be created under-~5 ground by the combined effect of multiple overstressed regions.
These, in turn, are created by drilling from the surface and by the periodic pumping of a finite gel strength fast setting ~174~364 fluid in the fashion previously described. The effect of the multiple overlapping regions is to create an arch of stress that partially lifts the overburden rock. If water or air is injected under pressure beneath this arch of stress, it will add to the lifting of the dome. If one were to pump the water or air without the arch of stress, the fluid would leak away to the surface and into the for~ation to no advantage.
~ig. 3 shows 2 cross section of a cavern formed , by multiple overstressed regions. Five overstressed regions, Rl, R2 and R3, etc., are shown in this cross-section view, but in ~hree dimensions a total of 14 is required (a central one, a ring of 4, and a ring of 9) for a dome or just 5 per section for an zrch. The injection holes, Hl, ~2, etc., are drilled to a depth describing the height of the arch. In general, the height of the arch should be equal to the radius and so the outside ring holes Hl and ~5 are drilled to a depth equal to one arch diameter D plus the dome depth d.
The central hole ~3 is then drilled to a depth D/2 + d. The middle ring of holes R2 and R4 should then be drilled to a 20 depth of 2D/3 + d. In general, the depth of the dome, d, should not be greater than its diameter D lest the coning of stresses increase the total force required to lift it.
The overstress in each region required to lift the dome will be that in each outer ring regions Rl and R5 considered as a footing. This force is larger than that corresponding to the overburden pressure times the area of the dome by the coning factor. Coning is the property of solid 117486~
materials to distribute stresses laterally so that the stresses "cone" away from a source. This factor is roughly as if a conical plug of material were lifted above the dome at a 30 angle as shown in the drawing by the lines X. In a typical case where tne depth is the same as the diameter, the coning effect roughly doubles the overburden force. Thereiore, the overburden force becomes 2~ (D/2)2 d, or if d~D, then F = (~/2)D3.
This must be supported by 9 stressed zones, R3 in a ring, of width ~ ~/2 or total area ~/4(D~ 2/2)2 x 9 - 3D2. ~he pressure in each zone then becomes force/area- 1/2 D. Not all of the outer ring of overstressed zones will be effective, and so it is conversative to say that the overpressure required will be the overburden pressure.
Por example, let d=D=1000 feet. Then ~P ~ 1000 PSI
and ~Vol - 14 regions x 4/3 ~(D 2/ ~ )3 (~P/B) ~ 10 2D3 for B =
2 x 1o6 PSI. This is the total volume of grout that would be needed to lift a dome, or 1/14 into each hole. The volume of rock that could be exposed for leaching or in situ mining would be of the order of 1/3 D3, and 50 the ratio of prestressed material to exposed rock becomes 1 to 30. A hole H6 is drilled down below ',he dome to inject water or air to aid in the lift of the dome.
The lifting of the dome requires that each overstressed zone be continually overstressed, i.e., grout should be pumped repeatedly as well as the injection of water or air at the over-burden pressure 1000 PSI in this case. Then the ground will li.t from the original level 0 to a lifted new level N. While this ,,,. 2gl68 74~364 is happening, the cavern C filled with water or air will form .
under the overstress regions as the dome is lifted by the combined stresses of the overstressed regions as well as the confined pressure of the lifting fluid. Thus, a dome or arch can be lifted by pumping predetermined amounts of a finite gel strength fast setting grout or fluid from the surface into a multiple of drill holes.
From the relationships described above, the gel strength and the~volume of the setting fluid to be iniected into the formation to obtain a desired overstress in a desired volume of rock can be determined. In particular, a gel is selected which has a gel strength approximately equal to the square of the desired stress increase diYided by the bulk modulus of the rock. The volume of gel pumped into the rock in each injection is roughly equal to L3(2G /B)~
The number of injec,ions of gel into the rock to produce a selected total overstress ~S) in a volume of about ~13 is roughly equal to 35/(GsB) ~2 .
The improved method, according to the present invention, can be used to alter and engineer the stress or pressure distribution in rock over an underground room or tunnel, to squeeze off water or gas flow in rock, to lift an arch or dome undersround and stabilize a building foundation, just to name a few examples.
In the more detailed description of the invention and some examples of its use, reference is made to the accompanyins drawings.
~7~864 DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Eig. 1 is 2 diagram depicting 2 crack formed by injecting settable fluid into an underground formation;
~ ig. 2 is a pictorial illustration of the use of the method in pressurizing the roof of a tunnel to keep it from caving; and Fig. 3 illustrates a use of the method to overstress ; several regions to producè an arch or dome underground.
MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION O~ T~E MET~OD
Fracturin~ With a Gel The property of a gel that is unique for creating a stress is its finite resistance to flow at zero velocity.
t~eslstance to flow at finite velocity is described by viscosity.) Thus, a stress in a gel can be "locked-in" by allowing the gel to "set~ after a finite time in a static condition. Typical examples are special grouts or catalytic polymerizing plastics. If a gel is forced into a channel of width W and length L, and arbitrarily large depth, then the pressure drop will be inversely proportional to the width, ~ 20 and proportional to both the length znd gel strength G. Thus the pressure drop becomas:
.
~ p = 2 Gs L/W. ~ tl This assumes that the flow is laminar, which is a good assumption because the equivalent viscosity is large and the 2~ A flow velocity is small. G5is a measure o' the shear strength of the gel and typically may be 10 2 to 1 PSI for useful a~plication to stress engineering. ~or example, the familiar food gelatin has a gel strength of roughly 1 PSI.
~1'74~364 If the channel of the above example (equation 1) is a fracture, ,hen the pressure drop due to the injection of the gel will be exerted on the walls of the fracture and tend to push apart the fracture and widen the channel. The relationship between this widening of the channel and the properties of the gel,rock formation, and fracture aIe the key to stress engineering.
A fracture is show~ in Figu e 1 as viewed in the direction of a bore hole 10. The fracture 12 extends symmetrically either side of the bore hole to a half length L
and to an arbltrary depth (into the paper) a distance larger than L. Thus, a semi-infinite cylindrical geometry is described.
Compressive stress is induced in the formation because of the width of the fracture. The formation is compressed in the orthogonal direction to the plane of the fracture. The region effected by the compression created by the fracture will have the same cylindrical geometry (shown by phantom lines 14) and will roughly extend a radial distance corresponding to the crack hal.
length-L. Thus, if we a?proximate the fractuse as a channel of constant width W, outlined by the dashed curve in ~igure 1, then the volume of the fracture, 2 L W per unit dep~h, is distributed as compressive stress in roughly a volume ~L2 per unit depth. ~hus, if this added volume creates only compressive stress, the increment of pressure in the fracture will be ~P - (volume added) (Bulk modulus) _ 2 L W B = W B (2 volume effected ~L2 ~L
11'74~64 where B is the bulk modulus. This is, of course, a gross approximation; real fractures have a more complicated shape determined by the rock strength that is described below. In addition, the pressure in the fracture or channel is an increment of pressure rather than an absolute value. In a real case, the fracture is formed underground where there exists a static in situ pressure, usua~ly the ~overburden"
pressure corresponding to the depth. This overburden pressure adds to the fracture pressure; hence the pressure added by the fracture is an increment of pressure.
If the fracture is made by pumping a gel at high pressure, then the pressure increment of equation 1 will hold open a fracture that has a normal stress described by equation 2.
If equations 1 and 2 are e~uated, one obtains W/~ (~ Gs/B) ~P - 2 Gs B/~ = 1.13 (Gs B) / (3 These relations state that both the length to width ratio of a fracture as well as the increment of pressure created are both a constant independent of the volume of gel pumped into the fracture. This means that provided the gel strength and bulk modulus are constant, then the increment of pressure is a constant no matter how much gel is pumped. It is only when the gel sets to a solid that a new injection of gel will create a new fracture, thus adding an increment to the previous pxessure.
Experimentation In some experimental work, 1/2 gallon to i gallon guantities of a finite gel strength grout (Gs= 2/10 PSI~ were pumped 1~74~364 into formations in a mine. Over many grout injections, the random incremental increase in the fracture pressure climbed roughly 500 to 5,000 psi per injection. If the bulk modulus is the average value 2 x 106 psi for hard rock, then from equation 3, ~P ~ 600 psi. Furthermore, once injection started in a new fracture, the pressure would very seldom increase and more often decrease as the pumping continued. The decrease can be explained by either a new fracture direction or a fracture and flow opening up into regions beyond tlarger L) those originally stressed and hence at a lower ambient stress.
These experiments are strong evidence of the behavior descri~ed by equation 3. Both the increments of pressure occurred as expected, and this increment of pressure was independent of volume pumped, provided the volume was not significantly larger than the previous injection.
Procedure for Creating an Overstressed Region One initially derines the region to be overstressed as extending some dimensibn ~ dependent upon the use. One further defines the overstress desired as some maximum value, ~Ptot~
~where this may be some multiple of the overburden pressure and or the rock strength. In general, the stress needed to hold the roof of a tunnel or dri~t is small, say one to several x 103 psi.
On the other hand, squeezing off a deep mine water flow or geo-pressurized brines may require 10 x this value. Then the total volume of gel or grout to be added becomes ~ Volume = (Volume ove_stressed)QPtot -3 ~L3~Ptot/B. (4 241~8 ~7~864 Ideally, one would like to create this overstress from three mutually perpendicular fractures, but in a real case the rock strength and heterogeneity would cause this to be unlikely. ~ence, the formation should be fractured with roughly at least twice this number of injections - say six -so that there is a reasonable chance of the fractures exploring most directions. The volume pumped with each injection should then be ~~ Vol/6. Since some of these fractures will be in the same direction as the previous one, the average increment of pressure created per injection will be about ~Ptot/3. The required gel strength is then determined using equation 3. If such a gel can be made and pumped, it is what is used. I~ the ~Ptot = 2000 ~SI, and B - 2 x 106 PSI, for example, the required gel strength is z 1/8 PSI, a value similar to a soft grease. Air operated grease lS pumps are available for pumping such a gel, and such pumps were used in the mine tests described above. An increment of pressure of a~ average of about 350 PSI per injection is expected, bu, some fractured at 700 PSI and some near zero. Averaged over six injections, an overpressure of ~Ptot ~ 2000 PSI should result.
The volume to be pumped per injection is then ~Vol~6, from equation 4. If the bulk modulus were smaller, or the desired ~Ptot larger, then a larger volume would have to be pumped in a larger number of injections. Similarly, a weaker gel would require a larger number of injections of smaller volume each.
Practical Volumes In drifting a tunnel to overstress the heading so that following eacn round an overpressure in the roo~ is created .a~7~6~
to prevent ca~ing, then it is worthwhile to evaluate the economics of overstressing versus some other safety features like cribbing or rock bolting. For example, suppose a 20 foot diameter heading is being run, making 15 feet per round. The stressing method involves drilling ahead by the round depth (15 feet) slightly above the roof level and overstressing to roughly 2000 PSI. This ensures a compressi~e stress greater ; than the tensile strength of the rock and so ensures a residual of primarily compressive stresses. This is .he optimum safe stress distribution in a roof. The hole 2D i~ drill~ t~ a dePth somewhat greater (say a foot) than the round depth, and a packer 22 is set to the depth of the round, 15 feet. The spherical region to be overstressed should be roughly the size of the drift, or 20 feet. The volume of rock affected is thus (4/3) ~ r3~ 4000 ft3-lS The increment of volume to be added becomes Vol = Volume x ~Ptot = 4 ft3. This is only four sacks of cement and is a trivialexpense in supplies compared to the labor and materials to advance - such a drift. The elaDsed time required to inject the grout is roughly six times the gel setting time ~six injections with setting times between them). The pumping time for each injection of 2/3 cubic feet (~ 5 gallons) is at most one minute, requiring 5 HP. If the pre-set time for the gel is ten times the pumping time, or 10 minutes per injection, the overstressing operation takes roushly an hour. The round can then be drilled and blasted immediately after stressing, because the grout will be urther set and the transient stress of blasting is short enough in duration so that the set grout will not be squeezed out.
il7~6~
The cost overhead of an hour is small compared to that required for cribbing which is roughly 1/2 to 1 times the labor required for a round and an additional equal cost for materials.
Embodiment of ~verstressing a Tunnel A typical ~hodiment of overstress for a mine or transportation tunnel is shown in Figure 2 and is described above. Consider a typical tunnel of 10 feet (3.3 meters) diameter. The depth underground is not important to the technique assuming only that it is less than typical mines or tunnels of 10,000 feet or 3 kilometers. Down to this depth most rock is stronq in compression compared to overbusden pressure, 1000 PSI, and so overstressing just serves to lock in the roc~s of the tunnel and does not attempt to distribute the compressive loads to a larger area (as would also be possi~le).
To lock in the rock surrounding the tunnel requires a pressure increase of only several thousand ~SI, that is, enough additional compression in the rock such as to ensure that no single rock can be likely supported in tension (since the tensile strength of rock rarely exceeds 2,000 PSI). A rock that is supported in tension can always be prone to collapse - i.e., fall -because of fracture. A rock in compression is held in place regardless of fractures. Tnat is, the mortar between the stones of a Roman arch does not support the arch; compressive stresses support the arch regardless of the mortar or any other presumed tensile strength.
~174864 In the tunnel the hole 20 is drilled and an injection pipe 24 set ahead and slightly above or at the level of the new tunnel roof. The depth of the hole is roughly the tunnel dizmeter - which is 10 feet (3 meters) in this case.
The packer 22 is set around the injection pipe 24 roughly 10 hole diameters from the end of the hole. The packer can be of any standard type; frequently the compression of a stack of rubber washers or the hydraulic inflation of a liner is used, or the pipe can be set in the rock with quick setting resins as is current roof bolting practice. ~he distance of packers from the hole botto~ is determined by the requirement to initially fracture the formation. If the length to diameter of the initial pressure region is large, i.e., 2 10 fold, then the anisotropy of the stresses (inside the uniform stress region depicted ~y 30)ensures that the hole will fracture if the fluid pressure is 2,000 to 4,000 PSI greater than the overburden pressure. The first fsacture is created by pumping water or oil by the same high pressure pump 26 that pumos the gel overstress fluid. The first fracture forms at a pressure (which can be read on the gauge 28) equal roughly to the overburden pressure plus some factor times the rock strength. Thus, if the tunnel is at, say, the 2,000 feet depth, then overburden pressu_e is 2,000 PSI and a fracture will form at 2,000 to 6,000 PSI
depending upon previous fractures. Once z fracture is formed, t~en the acceptance pressure of the 'racture 'luid will be overburden pressure. Then the fluid is changed to the over-pressure fluid of finite gel streng.h that will form the stress distribution outlined by the concentric circles 30.
~ 24168 1~7486~
A suitable settable fluid to use in the stress engi~eering method is a thick grout made up of 85~ neat cement, preferably the fast setting variety known as ~ y-Early which is a finer grind than normal cement. IA additiOn! 15%
5 plaster is used to give it gel properties. Calcium chloride up to 5~ can be added to speed up the setting time if needed.
Where the cement is mixed stochiametrically between the CaS04 plaster and the CaIII of the cement, it is known as ~Regulated Fill ~p ~ n a cement made by Dowell Corporation. The volume of cement or gel fluid to be pumped is determined by equation 4 with equation 5 substituted for ~P. That is, the volume of grout pumped in each injection becomes:
~ Vol ~ 4/3 ~ D3 (G /B)1/2 For typical thick grout, the gel strength Gs~ 1/10 PSI and the bulk modulus, ~ -2 x 106 PSI. The volume to be pumped becomes ~ ol - lo~3D3 ft3. Therefore, if the tunnel diameter is 10 feet and the overstressed region is the tunnel diameter, then each grout injection should be one cubic foot or 7.5 gallons. The period between injections should be 5 to 10 minutes, which is the typical time for such a grout to partially set. The . .
increment of pressure for each injec~ion will be(Gs~)l/2 ~ 450 PSI.
If the original tunnel was at a depth of say 2,000 feet; then the first injection of grout will be at roughly 2,500 PSI and progressively increases with each injection.
Of course, it must be recognized that previous fractures, altered stratigraphy and the like, will cause significant variations in the behavior outlined - like a factor of 2.
-~ 24168 ~17~864 If the ground is highly fractured, i.e., "bad" ground, then roughly double the number of injections will be required, and conversely rock that is geotechtonically prestressed will show an initial fracture pressure well above overburden pressure and the grout injection pressure will increase more rapidly.
Finally, there m2y be circumstances where a more ;rapid set time of the gel fluid is required than can be obtained by various grouts. In this case, the two co~ponent catalytically setting resins, such as epoxy or polystyrene, that are typically used to hold rock bolts in mines would be the preferred finite gel strength rapid setting fluid.
In the case of such a rapid set, it may be advantageous to use two pumps ~nd pipes, one for each component so that each resin component i5 separately injected into the end of the drill hole.
Mixing then takes place in the rock and not inside the reuseable equipment. The decision to use grout or two-component resin is mostly one of the cost of materials versus convenience. Grout is, of course, cheaper, but mixing, cleaning and waiting for a set is inconvenient. Resins are more expensive, but if mixing is achieved down hole, then no mixing equipment, cleaning or extrzneous holding period between injections is required.
Lifting of Underqround Domes A dome or arch-shaped cavern can be created under-~5 ground by the combined effect of multiple overstressed regions.
These, in turn, are created by drilling from the surface and by the periodic pumping of a finite gel strength fast setting ~174~364 fluid in the fashion previously described. The effect of the multiple overlapping regions is to create an arch of stress that partially lifts the overburden rock. If water or air is injected under pressure beneath this arch of stress, it will add to the lifting of the dome. If one were to pump the water or air without the arch of stress, the fluid would leak away to the surface and into the for~ation to no advantage.
~ig. 3 shows 2 cross section of a cavern formed , by multiple overstressed regions. Five overstressed regions, Rl, R2 and R3, etc., are shown in this cross-section view, but in ~hree dimensions a total of 14 is required (a central one, a ring of 4, and a ring of 9) for a dome or just 5 per section for an zrch. The injection holes, Hl, ~2, etc., are drilled to a depth describing the height of the arch. In general, the height of the arch should be equal to the radius and so the outside ring holes Hl and ~5 are drilled to a depth equal to one arch diameter D plus the dome depth d.
The central hole ~3 is then drilled to a depth D/2 + d. The middle ring of holes R2 and R4 should then be drilled to a 20 depth of 2D/3 + d. In general, the depth of the dome, d, should not be greater than its diameter D lest the coning of stresses increase the total force required to lift it.
The overstress in each region required to lift the dome will be that in each outer ring regions Rl and R5 considered as a footing. This force is larger than that corresponding to the overburden pressure times the area of the dome by the coning factor. Coning is the property of solid 117486~
materials to distribute stresses laterally so that the stresses "cone" away from a source. This factor is roughly as if a conical plug of material were lifted above the dome at a 30 angle as shown in the drawing by the lines X. In a typical case where tne depth is the same as the diameter, the coning effect roughly doubles the overburden force. Thereiore, the overburden force becomes 2~ (D/2)2 d, or if d~D, then F = (~/2)D3.
This must be supported by 9 stressed zones, R3 in a ring, of width ~ ~/2 or total area ~/4(D~ 2/2)2 x 9 - 3D2. ~he pressure in each zone then becomes force/area- 1/2 D. Not all of the outer ring of overstressed zones will be effective, and so it is conversative to say that the overpressure required will be the overburden pressure.
Por example, let d=D=1000 feet. Then ~P ~ 1000 PSI
and ~Vol - 14 regions x 4/3 ~(D 2/ ~ )3 (~P/B) ~ 10 2D3 for B =
2 x 1o6 PSI. This is the total volume of grout that would be needed to lift a dome, or 1/14 into each hole. The volume of rock that could be exposed for leaching or in situ mining would be of the order of 1/3 D3, and 50 the ratio of prestressed material to exposed rock becomes 1 to 30. A hole H6 is drilled down below ',he dome to inject water or air to aid in the lift of the dome.
The lifting of the dome requires that each overstressed zone be continually overstressed, i.e., grout should be pumped repeatedly as well as the injection of water or air at the over-burden pressure 1000 PSI in this case. Then the ground will li.t from the original level 0 to a lifted new level N. While this ,,,. 2gl68 74~364 is happening, the cavern C filled with water or air will form .
under the overstress regions as the dome is lifted by the combined stresses of the overstressed regions as well as the confined pressure of the lifting fluid. Thus, a dome or arch can be lifted by pumping predetermined amounts of a finite gel strength fast setting grout or fluid from the surface into a multiple of drill holes.
Claims (10)
OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. In a method of increasing the stress in a body of con-solidated material by repeatedly fracturing the material with a settable gel, the improvement wherein for a selected increase to be created in the stress in the material by each fracture a gel is selected which has a gel strength about equal to the square of the selected stress increase divided by the bulk modulus of the material and wherein the period between fractures is sufficient for the gel strength of the settable gel to increase by about an order of magnitude.
2. The improvement according to claim 1 wherein the volume of gel pumped into the material in each injection is about equal to L3 (2Gs/B)1/2, where:
L3 is a selected volume of the material into which the fractures are intended to extend, L being the linear extension of each fracture into the material from the region of injection of gel into the material;
Gs is the gel strength of the gel; and B is the bulk modulus of the material.
L3 is a selected volume of the material into which the fractures are intended to extend, L being the linear extension of each fracture into the material from the region of injection of gel into the material;
Gs is the gel strength of the gel; and B is the bulk modulus of the material.
3. The improvement according to claim 2 wherein the number of injections of gel in a volume for each injection according to claim 2 into the material to provide a selected total stress increase S in a volume of about (4/3).pi.L3 is about equal to 3S(GsB)1/2.
4. The improvement according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein the material is an underground formation to be stabilized.
5. The improvement according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the body of material is an underground formation that at least partly bounds an underground cavity.
6. The improvement according to any of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the body of material is an underground formation to be stabilized and wherein the volume of gel injected in any given injection is not substantially greater than the volume injected in any prior injection.
7. The improvement according to any of claims 1, 2, or 3, wherein the body of material is an underground formation to be stabilized and wherein the volumes of gel injected in a series of injections are substantially equal.
8. A method according to any of claims 1, 2 and 3, wherein the body of material is a region generally ahead of and above the next round of a cavity that is being excavated underground, and the stress in the material is increased to prevent caving as the cavity is driven into such round.
9. A method according to any of claims 1, 2 and 3, wherein the body of material is an underground zone subject to fluid flow and the stress in the zone is increased to at least partially block the fluid flow.
10. A method according to any of claims 1, 2 and 3, wherein the body of material is the ground site underlying a man-made structure and the stress in the material is increased to stabilize the site.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US06/175,047 US4370077A (en) | 1980-08-04 | 1980-08-04 | Method of pressurizing and stabilizing rock by periodic and repeated injections of a settable fluid of finite gel strength |
US175,047 | 1980-08-04 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1174864A true CA1174864A (en) | 1984-09-25 |
Family
ID=22638625
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000383054A Expired CA1174864A (en) | 1980-08-04 | 1981-07-31 | Method of pressurizing and stabilizing rock by periodic and repeated injections of a settable fluid of finite gel strength |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US4370077A (en) |
AU (1) | AU548279B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA1174864A (en) |
GB (1) | GB2083105B (en) |
SE (1) | SE455327B (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA815345B (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4621950A (en) * | 1983-01-18 | 1986-11-11 | Electric Power Research Institute | Techniques for establishing inground support footings and for strengthening and stabilizing the soil at inground locations |
SE439793B (en) * | 1983-10-21 | 1985-07-01 | Bjorn Magnus Ringesten Med Fir | PROCEDURE THROUGH COMPENSATION BASIS ASTADKOMMA BASIC AND / OR BASIC REINFORCEMENT |
EP0151389B1 (en) * | 1984-01-11 | 1990-07-25 | Stump Bohr GmbH | Method and apparatus for constructing building elements in the soil like piles, injection anchorages, cut-off walls or similar |
DE3644818A1 (en) * | 1986-12-31 | 1988-07-14 | Schlecht Karl | METHOD FOR ELIMINATING SPACE |
DE59200866D1 (en) * | 1991-02-05 | 1995-01-19 | Universale Bau Ag | Process for limiting subsidence in the creation of underground cavities. |
AU5496799A (en) * | 1998-08-27 | 2000-03-21 | Klug Kanal-, Leitungs- Und Umweltsanierungs-Gesel Lschaft Mbh | Method for sealing rocks or building material and corresponding device |
US20040071512A1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2004-04-15 | Muhlbaier David R. | Preferential fracturing of soil and material implantation |
ITMI20032154A1 (en) * | 2003-11-07 | 2005-05-08 | Uretek Srl | PROCEDURE TO INCREASE THE RESISTANCE OF A VOLUME |
ITTO20050586A1 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2007-02-24 | Trevi Spa | PROCEDURE FOR CONSOLIDATING AND WATERPROOFING THE SOIL AROUND A GALLERY TO BE TAKEN UNDER AN ACQUIFERA FALSE |
CN104806252B (en) * | 2015-04-28 | 2017-03-01 | 中铁工程设计咨询集团有限公司 | Underground dome excavation construction arrangement and excavation method |
CN108130901B (en) * | 2017-12-22 | 2019-11-19 | 中交第三航务工程局有限公司宁波分公司 | The construction method of Karst grouting |
CN108343102B (en) * | 2018-04-26 | 2024-02-27 | 北京恒祥宏业基础加固技术有限公司 | Pile foundation settlement reinforcement jacking leveling structure and construction method thereof |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2233872A (en) * | 1936-07-27 | 1941-03-04 | California Talc Company | Means and method for solidifying underground structures |
US2434301A (en) * | 1941-07-03 | 1948-01-13 | Louis S Wertz | Process of increasing the strength of porous structures |
US2947146A (en) * | 1955-03-28 | 1960-08-02 | Robert L Loofbourow | Sealing method for underground cavities |
SE358690B (en) * | 1960-05-05 | 1973-08-06 | Nitro Nobel Ab | |
US3518834A (en) * | 1968-05-09 | 1970-07-07 | Soil Testing Services Inc | Grouting system |
US3583166A (en) * | 1969-03-10 | 1971-06-08 | Edward D Graf | Method of stabilizing soils with controlled gelling of silicate grout solutions |
SE373636B (en) * | 1973-08-06 | 1975-02-10 | E I Janelid | SET FOR SEALING OF A ROCK AROUND A MOUNTAIN IN THE MOUNTAIN BERGROOM FOR A MEDIUM, WHICH TEMPERATURE DIFFERS FROM THE NATURAL TEMPERATURE OF THE ROCK |
US4084381A (en) * | 1977-01-19 | 1978-04-18 | Woodbine Corporation | Stabilization of earth subsurface layers |
-
1980
- 1980-08-04 US US06/175,047 patent/US4370077A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1981
- 1981-07-31 CA CA000383054A patent/CA1174864A/en not_active Expired
- 1981-08-03 GB GB8123669A patent/GB2083105B/en not_active Expired
- 1981-08-04 ZA ZA815345A patent/ZA815345B/en unknown
-
1982
- 1982-03-03 AU AU81073/82A patent/AU548279B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1982-03-04 SE SE8201336A patent/SE455327B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
SE8201336L (en) | 1983-09-05 |
US4370077A (en) | 1983-01-25 |
GB2083105A (en) | 1982-03-17 |
ZA815345B (en) | 1982-08-25 |
AU8107382A (en) | 1983-09-08 |
AU548279B2 (en) | 1985-12-05 |
GB2083105B (en) | 1984-03-07 |
SE455327B (en) | 1988-07-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1174864A (en) | Method of pressurizing and stabilizing rock by periodic and repeated injections of a settable fluid of finite gel strength | |
US20020057948A1 (en) | Multi grouting system | |
CN107313716B (en) | Drilling method for coal-bed gas well crossing goaf by composite plugging broken rock at hole bottom | |
AU769412B2 (en) | Controlled foam injection method and means for fragmentation of hard compact rock and concrete | |
CN109026070B (en) | Near-field stress regulation and control method for surrounding rock of deep-buried roadway cave | |
Krykovskyi et al. | Interaction of rock-bolt supports while weak rock reinforcing by means of injection rock bolts | |
US3690106A (en) | Method of treating permeable formations | |
CN110656936A (en) | Mine roof directional roof cutting pressure relief method based on static expanding agent | |
EP1373681B1 (en) | A method for pressure- and flow-preventive fixing of pipes in a well | |
CA2583016C (en) | Foam delivery system | |
US5199489A (en) | Method of cementing well casing to avoid gas channelling from shallow gas-bearing formations | |
CN108756883A (en) | A kind of coal mine tight roof slip casting fracturing process and system | |
CN108868769A (en) | A kind of construction method for reinforcing coal column based on swollen locking-type anchor cable | |
Shilova et al. | Protection of operating degassing holes from air inflow from underground excavations | |
CN110158621A (en) | Pre-pouring grout reinforcing side slope country rock promotes the method for being cleaved into seam effect in advance | |
Aul et al. | Grouting Horizontal Drainage Holes in Coalbeds | |
Egger | Rock stabilization | |
Lunardi et al. | The reinforcement of the core face: history and state of the art of the Italian technology that has revolutionized the world of tunneling. Some reflections | |
Garshol | Pre-excavation grouting in tunneling | |
Wan et al. | Post-grouting of drilled shaft tips in coral-reef limestone formations: a case study | |
De Laguna | Disposal of radioactive wastes by hydraulic fracturing: part II. Mechanics of fracture formation and design of observation and monitoring wells | |
Rana et al. | Performance of polyurethane grouting to handle heavy seepage in tunnels | |
CN107044270B (en) | Coal mine leting speeper casing water-stopping method and sealing casing | |
Stadler et al. | Permeation grouting | |
RU2687725C1 (en) | Processing method of insulation of mine working at thermal development of oil deposits |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKEX | Expiry |