NZ711079B2 - Method for determining the state of a refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular - Google Patents
Method for determining the state of a refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ711079B2 NZ711079B2 NZ711079A NZ71107914A NZ711079B2 NZ 711079 B2 NZ711079 B2 NZ 711079B2 NZ 711079 A NZ711079 A NZ 711079A NZ 71107914 A NZ71107914 A NZ 71107914A NZ 711079 B2 NZ711079 B2 NZ 711079B2
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- data
- vessel
- lining
- parameters
- measured
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 44
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010079 rubber tapping Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013528 artificial neural network Methods 0.000 claims 1
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract 2
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 abstract 2
- 230000009970 fire resistant effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000013178 mathematical model Methods 0.000 description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007664 blowing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- -1 ferrous metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21C—PROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
- C21C5/00—Manufacture of carbon-steel, e.g. plain mild steel, medium carbon steel or cast steel or stainless steel
- C21C5/28—Manufacture of steel in the converter
- C21C5/42—Constructional features of converters
- C21C5/44—Refractory linings
- C21C2005/448—Lining wear indicators
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21C—PROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
- C21C5/00—Manufacture of carbon-steel, e.g. plain mild steel, medium carbon steel or cast steel or stainless steel
- C21C5/28—Manufacture of steel in the converter
- C21C5/42—Constructional features of converters
- C21C5/44—Refractory linings
- C21C5/445—Lining or repairing the taphole
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D1/00—Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
- F27D1/16—Making or repairing linings ; Increasing the durability of linings; Breaking away linings
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D1/00—Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
- F27D1/16—Making or repairing linings ; Increasing the durability of linings; Breaking away linings
- F27D1/1636—Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D1/00—Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
- F27D1/16—Making or repairing linings ; Increasing the durability of linings; Breaking away linings
- F27D1/1636—Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining
- F27D1/1642—Repairing linings by projecting or spraying refractory materials on the lining using a gunning apparatus
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D1/00—Casings; Linings; Walls; Roofs
- F27D2001/0046—Means to facilitate repair or replacement or prevent quick wearing
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D21/00—Arrangement of monitoring devices; Arrangement of safety devices
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D21/00—Arrangement of monitoring devices; Arrangement of safety devices
- F27D21/0014—Devices for monitoring temperature
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D21/00—Arrangement of monitoring devices; Arrangement of safety devices
- F27D21/0021—Devices for monitoring linings for wear
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D21/00—Arrangement of monitoring devices; Arrangement of safety devices
- F27D21/0035—Devices for monitoring the weight of quantities added to the charge
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D3/00—Charging; Discharging; Manipulation of charge
- F27D3/15—Tapping equipment; Equipment for removing or retaining slag
- F27D3/1509—Tapping equipment
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F27—FURNACES; KILNS; OVENS; RETORTS
- F27D—DETAILS OR ACCESSORIES OF FURNACES, KILNS, OVENS OR RETORTS, IN SO FAR AS THEY ARE OF KINDS OCCURRING IN MORE THAN ONE KIND OF FURNACE
- F27D3/00—Charging; Discharging; Manipulation of charge
- F27D3/15—Tapping equipment; Equipment for removing or retaining slag
- F27D3/1509—Tapping equipment
- F27D3/1518—Tapholes
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for determining the state of a fire-resistant lining of a vessel (10) containing molten metal in particular. In the process, maintenance data, production data, and wall thicknesses at least at locations with the highest degree of wear are measured or ascertained together with additional process parameters of a vessel (10) after the vessel (10) has been used. Said data is then collected and stored in a data structure. A calculating model is generated from at least some of the measured or ascertained data or parameters, and said data or parameters are evaluated by means of the calculating model using calculations and subsequent analyses. Thus, related or integral ascertaining processes and subsequent analyses can be carried out, on the basis of which optimizations relating to both the vessel lining as well as the complete process of the molten metal in the vessel are achieved. ether with additional process parameters of a vessel (10) after the vessel (10) has been used. Said data is then collected and stored in a data structure. A calculating model is generated from at least some of the measured or ascertained data or parameters, and said data or parameters are evaluated by means of the calculating model using calculations and subsequent analyses. Thus, related or integral ascertaining processes and subsequent analyses can be carried out, on the basis of which optimizations relating to both the vessel lining as well as the complete process of the molten metal in the vessel are achieved.
Description
Method for Determining the State of a Refractory Lining
of a Metallurgical Vessel for Molten Metal in Particular
The invention relates to a method for determining the state of a refractory
lining of a metallurgical vessel, preferably a vessel for molten metal.
Calculation methods exist for the construction of the refractory lining in
particular of metallurgical vessels for molten metal, wherein ascertained data
or empirical values are converted into mathematical models. Since with these
mathematical models the effective wear mechanisms for the uses of the
metallurgical vessels can not be detected sufficiently accurately or be taken
into consideration, the possibilities for mathematically determining the
refractory constructions and the maintenance work for the lining are very
restricted, i.e. decisions regarding the period of use of the refractory lining of a
vessel, for example of a converter, must still be taken manually.
In a method according to publication WO-A-03/081157 for measuring the
residual thickness of the refractory lining in the wall and/or base area of a
metallurgical vessel, e.g. of an arc furnace, the measured data ascertained
are used for the subsequent repair of the areas of wear that have been
identified. The measuring unit is brought here on a manipulator serving to
repair the lining into a measuring position over or inside the metallurgical
vessel and the residual thickness of the lining is then measured in its wall
and/or base area. By comparing with a current profile of the lining measured
at the start of the furnace campaign its wear is ascertained, on the basis of
which the refractory lining can then be repaired. With this method, however,
comprehensive ascertainment of the vessel lining is not possible either.
According to publication WO-A-2007/107242 a method for determining the
wall thickness or the wear of the lining of a metallurgical crucible with a
scanner system for contactlessly sensing the lining surface with determination
of the position and orientation of the scanner system and assignment to the
position of the crucible by detecting spatially fixed reference points is
disclosed. A perpendicular reference system is used here and the tilts of two
axes in relation to a horizontal plane are measured by means of tilt sensors.
The data measured by the scanner can be transformed into a perpendicular
coordinate system and automated measurement of the respective current
state of the lining of the crucible is thus possible.
On the basis of these known calculation methods or measuring methods it is
the object of the present invention to devise a method by means of which the
service life of the refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel and the process in
its own right can be optimised and manual decisions for this purpose are
reduced or practically eliminated.
The method according to the invention makes provision such that all of the
data of a respective vessel are collected and stored in a data structure, and a
calculation model is generated from all of the measured and ascertained data
or parameters, by means of which these data or parameters are evaluated by
means of calculations and subsequent analyses.
With this method according to the invention, for a metallurgical vessel one can
ascertain not only measurements in order to identify the current state of the
vessel after it has been used, but related or integral ascertaining processes
and subsequent analyses can also be carried out from which optimisations
are achieved both in relation to the vessel lining and to the entire process
sequence of the molten mass poured into the vessel and treated within the
latter.
Additional advantageous details of this method within the framework of the
invention are defined in the dependent claims.
Exemplary embodiments as well as additional advantages of the invention are
described in more detail below by means of a drawing. This shows:
Fig. 1 a diagrammatic longitudinal section of a metallurgical vessel
sub-divided into sectors.
The method relates in particular to metallurgical vessels, one such vessel 10
being shown in section in Fig. 1 as an exemplary embodiment. In this
instance the vessel 10 is a converter, known in its own right, for the
production of steel. The vessel 10 consists essentially of a metal housing 15,
a refractory lining 12 and gas purging plugs 17, 18 which can be coupled to a
gas supply (not detailed).
The molten metal which is poured into this vessel 10 during operation is
treated metallurgically, for example by a blowing process which will not be
described in any more detail. Generally a number of these converters 10 are
used at the same time in a steel works and data are to be recorded for each
of these converters.
Needless to say, the method can be used for different metallurgical vessels,
such as for example for electric furnaces, blast furnaces, steel ladles, vessels
in the field of non-ferrous metals such as aluminium melting furnaces, copper
anode furnaces or the like.
The method is also characterised in that it can likewise be used for different
containers. Thus, for example, the refractory linings of all converters and
ladles in operation can be determined, wherein the same molten mass is first
of all treated in a converter and is then poured into steel ladles.
First of all, all of the data for each vessel 10, sub-divided into groups, are
collected and stored in a data structure.
In order to measure the wear as a group of the vessel lining 12 embedded
within the metal housing 15, this initially takes place on the new refractory
lining which is generally provided with different blocks 14, 16 or wall
thicknesses. This can also take place by measuring or by the pre-specified
dimensions of the blocks 14, 16 being known. In addition, the materials and
material properties of the blocks 14, 16 used and of any injected materials
used are recorded.
For the additional group identified as production data recording takes place
during the period of use of the respective vessel 10, such as the amount of
molten mass, the temperature, the composition of the molten mass or the slag
and its thickness, tapping times, temperature profile, treatment time and/or
metallurgical parameters such as particular additions to the molten mass.
Depending on the type of vessel, only some or all of the aforementioned
production data are recorded.
Furthermore, after using a vessel 10 a measurement of the wall thicknesses
of the lining 12 is then taken, at least at the points with the greatest wear, for
example at the contact points of the slag when the vessel is full, but preferably
of the entire lining 12. It is sufficient here if the wall thicknesses of the lining
12 are measured after a number of tappings.
Other process parameters, such as the manner of pouring or tapping the
molten metal into or out of the crucible can then be ascertained.
According to the invention, a calculation model is generated from at least
some of the measured and ascertained data or parameters, by means of
which these data or parameters are evaluated by calculations and subsequent
analyses.
By means of this calculation model generated according to the invention the
maximum period of use, the wall thicknesses, the materials and/or the
maintenance data of the refractory lining 12 or, conversely, the process
sequences for the treatment of the molten mass can be optimised. From
these analyses a decision can sometimes be made here regarding further use
of the lining with or without repairs. One no longer requires, or if so only to a
limited extent, manual experiential interpretation of the period of use of the
lining 12 and of the other values to be determined, such as wall thicknesses,
material selection etc..
Advantageously the metallurgical vessel 10, such as for example a converter,
is sub-divided into different sections 1 to 10, sections 1, 2, 8 being assigned to
the upper vessel part, sections 3, 7, 9 being assigned to the side vessel part,
and sections 4, 5, 6 being assigned to the vessel base.
Sections 1 to 10 are evaluated individually or independently of one another
with the calculation model. The advantage of this is that the different loads of
the lining in the vessel base, the side walls or in the upper vessel part can be
correspondingly taken into account.
Before or during generation of the calculation model the data are checked for
plausibility after being recorded and if there is a lack or an anomaly of one or
more values, the latter are respectively corrected or deleted. After preferably
individually checking the data, the latter are stored as an assembled, valid set
of data.
Advantageously, a reduced number is selected from the measured or
ascertained data or parameters for the recurring calculations or analyses, this
taking place dependently upon empirical values or by calculation methods.
This selection of measured or ascertained data or parameters for the
recurring calculations or analyses takes place by means of algorithms, for
example a random feature selection.
The other data ascertained, but not utilised any further, are used for statistical
purposes or for later recording for the reconstruction of production errors or
similar.
As another advantage of the invention, the calculation model is adapted from
the measurements of the wall thicknesses of the lining 12 after a number of
tappings by means of an analysis, for example a regression analysis, by
means of which the wear can be calculated or simulated taking into account
the collected and structured data. This adapted calculation model is also
especially suitable for use for the purposes of testing, in order to test or
simulate process sequences or to make specific changes.
The invention is sufficiently displayed by the exemplary embodiment
described above. Needless to say it could also be realised by other
variations.
Thus, the vessel 10 is provided on the side, in a way known in its own right,
with at least one other outlet opening (not shown in any more detail), with
which a special tap with a number of refractory sleeves lined up in a row is
generally used. Needless to say, the state of this tap is also measured and
ascertained and included in the calculation model according to the invention.
Claims (11)
1. A method for determining the state of a refractory lining of a vessel containing a molten metal characterised in that the following measured or established data of the vessel (10) are all collected and stored in a data structure, namely ➢ the initial refractory construction of the inner vessel lining (12), such as materials, material properties, wall thicknesses of blocks and/or injected materials as maintenance data; ➢ production data during use, such as amount of molten mass, temperature, composition of the molten mass or the slag and its thickness, tapping times, temperature profiles, treatment times and/or metallurgical parameters; ➢ wall thicknesses of the lining after using the vessel (10), at least at points with the greatest degree of wear; ➢ additional process parameters such as the manner of pouring or tapping the molten metal into or out of the vessel (10); that a calculation model is generated from at least some of the measured or established data or parameters of the maintenance data, the production data, the wall thicknesses and the process parameters, by means of which these data or parameters are evaluated by means of calculations and subsequent analyses; by means of this calculation model generated the maximum period of use, the wall thicknesses, the materials and/or the maintenance data of the refractory lining (12) or, conversely, the process sequences for the treatment of the molten mass is optimised and from these analyses a decision is made regarding further use of the lining with or without repairs, wherein the calculation model is adapted from the measurements of the wall thicknesses of the lining 12 after a number of tappings by means of an analysis, for example a regression analysis, by means of which the wear is calculated or simulated taking into account the collected and structured data.
2. The method according to Claim 1, characterised in that the data are checked after being recorded, and if there is a lack or an anomaly of one or more values, the data are respectively corrected or deleted.
3. The method according to Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that after individually checking the data, the data are stored as an assembled, valid set of data.
4. The method according to any of the preceding Claims 1 to 3, characterised in that a reduced number is selected from the measured or ascertained data or parameters for the recurring calculations or analyses, this taking place dependently upon empirical values or by calculation methods.
5. The method according to Claim 4, characterised in that this selection of measured or ascertained data or parameters for the recurring calculations or analyses takes place by means of algorithms, for example a random feature selection.
6. The method according to Claim 4 or 5, characterised in that the data not selected are used for statistical purposes or for later recording of data.
7. The method according to any of the preceding Claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the wall thicknesses of the lining (12) are measured after a number of tappings, on the basis of these measurements, withthis calculation model making a decision regarding further use with or without repairs of the vessel.
8. The method according to any of the preceding Claims 1 to 7, characterised in that the calculation model is adapted from the measurements of the wall thicknesses of the lining (12) after a number of tappings by means of an analysis, for example a regression analysis, by means of which the wear can be calculated taking into account the data collected.
9. The method according to Claim 8, characterised in that the calculation model for a neural network is used for purposes of testing, in order to test or simulate process sequences and in order to make specific changes in actual operation on this basis.
10. The method according to any of the preceding Claims 1 to 9, characterised in that the vessel (10), such as for example a converter, is divided into different sections (1 to 10) and the calculation model evaluates these sections independently of one another on the basis of all of the measured data.
11. The method according to Claim 10, characterised in that the sections (1 to 10) are selected from the circumference of the vessel (10) and from its height.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP13163565.8A EP2789960B1 (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2013-04-12 | Method for determining the condition of a fire-resistant lining of a metallurgical melting vessel |
EP13163565.8 | 2013-04-12 | ||
PCT/EP2014/054474 WO2014166679A1 (en) | 2013-04-12 | 2014-03-07 | Method for determining the state of a fire-resistant lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
NZ711079A NZ711079A (en) | 2021-04-30 |
NZ711079B2 true NZ711079B2 (en) | 2021-08-03 |
Family
ID=
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2901222C (en) | Method for determining the state of a fire-resistant lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular | |
US10935320B2 (en) | Method for determining the state of a refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular | |
JP5114666B2 (en) | Refractory layer residual dimension measurement method for molten metal containers | |
JP7382495B2 (en) | Refractory performance prediction measurement system | |
JP2013221659A (en) | Prediction method for steel leakage position | |
JP6165656B2 (en) | Life prediction method for refractories in the furnace | |
JP5487730B2 (en) | Refractory life prediction method and refractory residual thickness estimation method | |
CN111815072B (en) | Steel ladle leakage prevention early warning method, device and storage medium in steelmaking continuous casting process | |
CN111579592B (en) | Method for monitoring corrosion degree of high-temperature operation container | |
NZ711079B2 (en) | Method for determining the state of a refractory lining of a metallurgical vessel for molten metal in particular | |
Petrova et al. | DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR CONDITION BASED MAINTANCE OF STEEL CASTING LADLES. | |
Petrova et al. | DETERMINATION OF DEFECTS PARAMETERS IN INFRARED DIAGNOSIS OF STEEL LADLE WALL. | |
JP5906945B2 (en) | How to prevent ladle leakage | |
JP2014142152A (en) | Residual thickness measurement method of wear layer | |
CN118794355A (en) | Ladle lining thickness prediction method | |
RU2354708C1 (en) | Method of determining of optimal assignment of gas stream by radius of blast furnace | |
Aripova et al. | Assessment of Reliability and Technical Risks in the Operation of Heat Engineering Units | |
Viertauer et al. | Lasers and infra-red cameras | |
JP5920267B2 (en) | Mushroom detection method for converter bottom tuyeres and anomaly detection method for bottom tuyeres using it | |
KR20100051448A (en) | System and method for visualizing temperature distribution in blast furnace | |
MXPA00002945A (en) | Method for monitoring the wear and extending the life of blast furnace refractory lining |