NZ628759A - A method of associating entities - Google Patents
A method of associating entities Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- NZ628759A NZ628759A NZ628759A NZ62875914A NZ628759A NZ 628759 A NZ628759 A NZ 628759A NZ 628759 A NZ628759 A NZ 628759A NZ 62875914 A NZ62875914 A NZ 62875914A NZ 628759 A NZ628759 A NZ 628759A
- Authority
- NZ
- New Zealand
- Prior art keywords
- entity
- database
- panel
- entities
- user
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 29
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/16—Real estate
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
A method of associating entities by way of a computerised device is disclosed. The method comprises the steps of a) providing a computerised database of entities. b) Enabling a user of the device to search the database for one of the entities such that the name of that entity displays on a screen of the device in a results panel (2). c) Enabling the user to use the device to select the entity and cause the name to appear at a build panel (3) on the screen for defining the structure of the entity. d) Enabling the user to search the database for a second entity and displaying the name thereof in the results panel (2). e) Enabling the user to select and cause the name of the second entity to appear in the build panel (3) as a member of the first mentioned entity so that such membership is recorded in the database.
Description
COMPLETE SPECIFICATION
TITLE
A Method of Associating Entities.
FIELD OF INVENTION
A preferred form of the invention relates to a method of associating entities, for
example for document creation using a computerised device.
BACKGROUND
Documents of various types have long been used to manage the affairs of life,
including personal and business commitments. Creation of such documents can be
a time consuming exercise and it is desirable to be able to simplify the process.
It is an object of a preferred form of the invention to go at least some way towards
addressing the above issue. While this object applies to the preferred embodiment, it
should not be taken as a limit on the scope of the invention as claimed. The object of
the invention per se is simply to provide the public with a useful choice.
The term “comprising”, if and when used in this document, should be interpreted non-
exclusively. For example if used in relation to a combination of features it should not
be taken as precluding the option of there being further unnamed features.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the invention there is provided a method of associating
entities by way of a computerised device, comprising the steps of:
a) providing a computerised database of entities;
b) enabling a user of the device to search the database for one of the
entities such that the name of that entity displays on a screen of the device
in a results panel;
c) enabling the user to use the device to select the entity and cause the
name to appear at a build panel on the screen for defining the structure of
the entity;
d) enabling the user to search the database for a second entity and
displaying the name thereof in the results panel; and
e) enabling the user to select and cause the name of the second entity to
appear in the build panel as a member of the first mentioned entity so
that such membership is recorded in the database.
Optionally steps d) and e) are able to be repeated for one or more further entities so
that it/they are each also allocated as a member of the first mentioned entity.
Optionally the entities in the database are selected from the group consisting of at
least people, trusts, companies and societies.
Optionally entities are able to be transferred to the build panel by dragging and
dropping.
Optionally the second entity is a person.
Optionally the membership record is used to computer generate a document naming
the first entity as a subject of the document and the second entity as an authorising
member of the first mentioned entity.
Optionally the second entity is a signatory for the document.
Optionally the first mentioned entity is a contracting party for the document.
Optionally the user is able to enter a new entity into the database by way of the
device.
Optionally a database record is kept for the first mentioned entity so that its
membership can be amended and, in the event of such change, the amended
membership is recorded in the database as the current one.
Optionally the results panel displays on-screen with visible boundaries.
Optionally the results panel displays on-screen without visible boundaries.
Optionally the build panel displays on-screen with visible boundaries.
Optionally the build panel displays on-screen without visible boundaries
Optionally when the second entity is caused to appear in the build panel at item e) it
automatically displays there as a type of member dependant on the type of the first
mentioned entity.
Optionally the document is one of:
a) a contract of a type not mentioned below;
b) a mortgage;
c) a deed;
d) a constitution;
e) a shareholders agreement;
f) an affidavit,
g) a declaration;
h) an affirmation;
i) a lease;
j) a will;
k) a property sale and purchase agreement;
l) an easement;
m) a covenant;
n) a variation;
o) an assignment;
p) a guarantee;
q) a novation;
r) minutes;
s) a resolution;
t) an event timeline; and
u) a form.
Optionally one or more of the panels incorporates one or more sub-panels.
New Zealand patent specification 700835, which depends from this application
describes and claims a computerised method of managing events.
According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a computerised
method of managing events, comprising the steps of:
(a) displaying on the screen of a computerised device a number of events
potentially relevant to a transaction in a manner that two or more of the
events can be selected by the user;
(b) after a user has selected two or more of the events, the selections being
computer processed and displayed onscreen as a time based symbolic
hierarchy representing the transaction, each event being recorded against a
date by way of software, wherein some of the dates are automatically
computer calculated or can be selected and made dependant on at least
another of the dates; and
(c) the hierarchy being such that a symbol representing each event can be user
selected to display alpha numeric detail particularising the event.
Optionally each symbol is particular to the type of event it represents.
DRAWINGS
Some preferred embodiments of the invention will described by way of example and
with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Figure 1 is a screen shot from a computer running software for creating a lease
document;
Figure 2 is a screen shot illustrating the manner in which an entity can be
loaded into a database controlled by the software;
Figure 3 is a screen shot illustrating how the software can be used to define the
structure of an entity; and
Figure 4 is a screen shot illustrating a software controlled timeline of lease
events.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In one preferred embodiment of the invention a computerised device runs software
for creating a document. The device may for example be a desktop computer, a
laptop, a tablet or a smartphone. The software may be installed on the device, or the
device may simply run it from the cloud.
In the example shown in figure 1 the document is for a lease. It should however be
appreciated that the software can be used to create a myriad of alternative
documents. The software causes a search panel 1 to appear on screen to enable a
human user to search a database of entities. In this regard an entity name is keyed
into the search panel 1 and, if the entity searched on is recorded in the database, its
name appears in a results panel 2. The user can then click on the results panel 2
and drag a node displaying the name to a build panel 3. The node is then dropped to
populate the build panel 3. For example, if the node represents the landlord it is
dropped into field 4 of the build panel which designates the landlord. Other fields of
the build panel, for example the tenant and guarantor fields 5, 6, can be populated in
the same way. In each case the name of the tenant and guarantor is located using
the search panel 1, and a corresponding node dragged and dropped from the results
panel 2 to the appropriate part of the build panel 3.
Preferably the search panel 1 works on a filtering basis in that as one keys a name
into it, the results panel 2 is automatically populated with entity names corresponding
to the text typed. For example if only the text “Smi” is typed in, the software causes
all names in the database beginning “Smi” to be displayed in the results panel 2, in
alphabetical order – eg Smith, Smithers, Smithson, etc, etc. As more text is typed
into the search panel 1 irrelevant hits are progressively filtered out and consequently
not displayed. If the search ends with more than one hit displayed in the results
panel, then the user can select the one wanted and drag and drop it into the build
panel 3.
If an entity search gives a nil result then the software offers the user a facility to load
the entity into the database. This is achieved by way of an on-screen dialogue box 7
as shown in figure 2. In the example shown, the box 7 only prompts for basic details,
but in some embodiments it may prompt for more comprehensive information; for
example details as to name, nationality, physical address, postal address, email
address, phone number, etc. When the new entity is a company, for example, the
dialogue box may prompt for its directors to be loaded. However if the directors are
already recorded in the database then they can simply be searched and selected.
Either way, the software creates an association in the database between the
company and the directors.
Figure 3 illustrates the creation of a lease document at a more advanced stage. As
can be seen, “Company X” has been entered as the landlord and “The Smith Family
Trust” as the tenant. When Company X is dropped into the landlord field it
immediately and automatically appears with its signatory directors 8 displayed. The
display is hierarchical so that the directors 8 are shown as subsets or members of the
company. The user does not have to specifically enter the director names 8 because
they have already been associated with Company X at the time it was loaded into the
database. The association remains, so that wherever the company goes, the
directors follow. If a director is removed from the company, for example by dragging
the name from the landlord panel and dropping it at a delete panel 9, then the
association is broken and this is recorded by the software in the database. Changes
to associations are applied ‘database wide’ so that they only need to be done once.
With further reference to figure 3, The Smith Family Trust displays as the tenant, with
its members shown in hierarchical order. The members comprise three trustees 9.
One of the trustees is a company and so its directors 10 are shown as members of
that company. The tenant is therefore displayed in a tree structure which enables the
user to easily see and appreciate the structure of the entity being dealt with.
When all entities of the lease have been entered, the user clicks to cause the
software to generate the lease document ready for signing. The software
automatically populates the document with the relevant entities recorded in the
relevant places (with address details if appropriate), including in signature clauses.
This enables a user to more quickly and less painstakingly create the document, ie
as opposed to having type in entity names and details each time a new document is
created.
A similar process can be followed for creating documents such as wills, in which case
the entities may include the testator, the executor and witnesses. In the case of a
license agreement, the entities may be the licensor and the licensee, and in the case
of a mortgage they may be the mortgagee, the mortgagor and a guarantor. It should
be understood that the inventive concept has applicability to a wide variety of
documents and that those mentioned above are just examples.
A useful aspect of the invention is that when an entity record is generated for the
database the user first selects the type of entity being created. The name of the
entity is then dragged and dropped from the results panel to the build panel 3. If for
example the user has selected to create a ‘company’ entity then the software
automatically determines that the next entity dragged and dropped into the build
panel 3 is a director. The director is accordingly displayed in the build panel as a
subset of the company, eg in a family tree format. It is not necessary to select
‘director’ for the software to know that the second is intended to be a director.
Records for other entity types are generated in the same way. For example in the
case of a trust selection, the first name dragged into the build panel 3 is the name of
the trust. Subsequent entities dragged into the build panel are automatically
allocated and displayed as trustees.
In some embodiments of the invention the software may have facility to connect the
user to a third party database, for example to a Register of Companies held by a
State run Companies Office, and entity details from there may be searched and
displayed for selection into the document as desired.
While the invention has particular application to the creation of documents, in some
embodiments it simply provides a convenient way for users to create, record and
view in a family tree format a number of membership type associations between
entities. For example, such embodiments can facilitate efficient entry of data into a
property management database even if there is no document creation facility, or if
the facility is available but only used sporadically.
In a further embodiment of the invention the software can be operated by the user to
build and display an agreement entered into between entities in terms of events. In
building the document, event categories can be selected. On selection, the software
causes a clause corresponding to the event to be incorporated in the document.
Examples of some lease events are:
commencement date;
possession date;
rent payment dates;
property inspection dates;
rent review dates;
lease renewal dates;
assignment or transfer of lease rights;
expiration date;
etc.
When called upon, the software causes the events to display onscreen in time order,
for example with a timeline as shown in figure 4. This provides an easy to appreciate
single page overview, with each locus 11 of the timeline corresponding to one of the
events. If a mouse pointer 12 is hovered over a locus then a descriptor box 13
appears and displays the exact date of the event and just what it is about. Software
controlling the timeline uses the date of at least some of the events to calculate the
date relevant to others of the events, and this is recorded for each event. For
example ‘rent due’ dates will depend on the commencement date for lease, as will
rent reviews. Inspection dates may be calculated dependent on when the last
inspection occurred, etc. Documents relevant to some of the events, eg lease deeds
of renewal, may be generated by the software and associated with the relevant locus.
Each event type may be associated with a particular colour and each locus rendered
in that colour, such that a user can easily appreciate the nature of each event in the
timeline.
When a locus is specifically selected (eg clicked on), the particulars for the event
display onscreen. For a past event the particulars may indicate exactly what
happened, for example that a rent payment totalling such and such dollars was
received, or that a payment was missed, etc. The software thus provides a user with
an ability to easily view a complete history of the lease arrangement, including the
conduct of the parties.
Copies of documents associated with an event may be viewed on-screen by
selecting them once the event itself has been chosen. For example a pdf of the
lease document may be obtained via a locus relating to a ‘commencement of lease’
event, and a pdf of a renewal document obtained via a ‘lease renewal’ locus, etc.
Loci for upcoming lease renewals may also be associated with user selectable
documents for signing by the landlord and tenant. Documents are therefore
preferably saved against the relevant locus as opposed to a general documents
folder.
The software enables other document types to be generated, particularised and
displayed in similar fashion. The exact mechanics will of course be modified to suit
the document, but the same principle applies.
In some embodiments of the invention the timeline aspect may omit the document
creation aspect and simply provide a convenient on-screen one-line display of the
historical, future, missed and/or overdue steps to a transaction or a legal relationship
generally. Changes or updates are entered into the underlying database of
information and the software uses these to modify or update the timeline as
appropriate. In some embodiments, old timelines may be called up from a data
record to show how they were at a selected date or dates, prior to changes or
updates. And in some embodiments a user has a facility to filter events, or in other
words to select for viewing at a particular time only the sort of events the user is
interested in.
While some preferred aspects of the invention have been described by way of
example it should be appreciated that modifications and improvements can occur
without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims (19)
1. A method of associating entities by way of a computerised device, comprising the steps of: 5 a) providing a computerised database of entities; b) enabling a user of the device to search the database for one of the entities such that the name of that entity displays on a screen of the device in a results panel; c) enabling the user to use the device to select the entity and cause the 10 name to appear at a build panel on the screen for defining the structure of the entity; d) enabling the user to search the database for a second entity and displaying the name thereof in the results panel; and e) enabling the user to select and cause the name of the second entity to 15 appear in the build panel as a member of the first mentioned entity so that such membership is recorded in the database.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein steps d) and e) are able to be repeated for one or more further entities so that it/they are each also allocated as a 20 member of the first mentioned entity.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the entities in the database are selected from the group consisting of at least people, trusts, companies and societies.
4. A method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein entities are able to be transferred to the build panel by dragging and dropping.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the second 30 entity is a person.
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, comprising the step of using the membership record to computer generate a document naming the first entity as a subject of the document and the second entity as an authorising 35 member of the first mentioned entity.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the second entity is a signatory for the document.
8. A method according to claim 6 or 7, wherein the first mentioned entity is a contracting party for the document. 5
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the user is able to enter a new entity into the database by way of the device.
10. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein a database record is kept for the first mentioned entity so that its membership can be 10 amended and, in the event of such change, the amended membership is recorded in the database as the current one.
11. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the results panel displays on-screen with visible boundaries.
12. A method according to any one of claims 1-10, wherein the results panel displays onscreen without visible boundaries.
13. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the build panel 20 displays onscreen with visible boundaries.
14. A method according to any one of claims 1-12, wherein the build panel displays onscreen without visible boundaries 25
15. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein when the second entity is caused to appear in the build panel at item e) it automatically displays there as a type of member dependant on the type of the first mentioned entity. 30
16. A method according to claim 6, 7 or 8, or any one of claims 9-14 when read back on claim 6 directly or indirectly, wherein the document is one of: a) a contract of a type not mentioned below; b) a mortgage; c) a deed; 35 d) a constitution; e) a shareholders agreement; f) an affidavit, g) a declaration; h) an affirmation; i) a lease; j) a will; 5 k) a property sale and purchase agreement; l) an easement; m) a covenant; n) a variation; o) an assignment; 10 p) a guarantee; q) a novation; r) minutes; s) a resolution; t) an event timeline; and 15 u) a form.
17. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein one or more of the panels incorporates one or more sub-panels. 20
18. A method according to claim 1, substantially as herein described.
19. A method substantially as herein described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| NZ700835A NZ700835A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
| NZ628759A NZ628759A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
| PCT/NZ2015/050110 WO2016024871A1 (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2015-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| NZ628759A NZ628759A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| NZ628759A true NZ628759A (en) | 2015-03-27 |
Family
ID=52706707
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| NZ628759A NZ628759A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
| NZ700835A NZ700835A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
Family Applications After (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| NZ700835A NZ700835A (en) | 2014-08-13 | 2014-08-13 | A method of associating entities |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| NZ (2) | NZ628759A (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2016024871A1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6064984A (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 2000-05-16 | Marketknowledge, Inc. | Graphical user interface for a computer-implemented financial planning tool |
| AU2001294905A1 (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2002-04-15 | Seema Shenoy | Methods and systems for creating and managing capital asset business exchange |
| US7856389B2 (en) * | 2004-10-14 | 2010-12-21 | Deutsche Bank Ag | Dynamic book yield analysis |
| US7693862B2 (en) * | 2005-06-29 | 2010-04-06 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface mechanism to formulate complex query against an entity relationship model |
| CA2635592A1 (en) * | 2006-01-03 | 2007-07-12 | Siperian, Inc. | Searching, filtering, creating, displaying, and managing entity relationships across multiple data hierarchies through a user interface |
| US20080172636A1 (en) * | 2007-01-12 | 2008-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface for selecting members from a dimension |
| US20080288462A1 (en) * | 2007-05-16 | 2008-11-20 | Naono Norihiko | Database system and display method on information terminal |
| CA2615205A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2009-06-18 | Media Trust, Inc. | Entity networking system using displayed information for exploring connectedness of selected entities |
| WO2009086194A2 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-07-09 | Nevins David C | Apparatus, system, and method for organizing information by time and place |
| US8839133B2 (en) * | 2010-12-02 | 2014-09-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Data visualizations including interactive time line representations |
| CA2776229A1 (en) * | 2011-05-09 | 2012-11-09 | Rent Check Credit Bureau | An automated method and system for interactive compulsory reporting of lease application adjudication decisions, ongoing tenancy histories and debtor collections |
| US9519692B2 (en) * | 2011-09-29 | 2016-12-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Visualizing related events within a timeline |
-
2014
- 2014-08-13 NZ NZ628759A patent/NZ628759A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2014-08-13 NZ NZ700835A patent/NZ700835A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2015
- 2015-08-13 WO PCT/NZ2015/050110 patent/WO2016024871A1/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2016024871A1 (en) | 2016-02-18 |
| NZ700835A (en) | 2015-02-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10192272B2 (en) | Expense report management methods and apparatus | |
| US12056666B2 (en) | Collaborative due diligence review system | |
| US8650038B2 (en) | Systems and processes for obtaining and managing electronic signatures for real estate transaction documents | |
| US8069093B2 (en) | Website user account linking | |
| US7873557B2 (en) | Information, document, and compliance management for financial professionals, clients, and supervisors | |
| US7941336B1 (en) | Segregation-of-duties analysis apparatus and method | |
| US20090282006A1 (en) | Transaction Management | |
| AU2013202484A1 (en) | Determining local tax structures in an accounting application through user contribution | |
| US20100318926A1 (en) | User interface for entering account dimension combinations | |
| US20090248643A1 (en) | Crime information coordination system and method | |
| US20150227542A1 (en) | Graphical User Interface For A Data Record Matching Application | |
| US20090070151A1 (en) | Advanced integrated data environment | |
| US20090171884A1 (en) | System and method for web-based case management | |
| US8799117B2 (en) | Record retention and post-issuance compliance system and method for municipal bonds | |
| Azma et al. | Issues and prospects of Islamic hire purchase financing: Malaysian evidence | |
| US9058606B1 (en) | Computer implemented method for forming an accelerated compliance plan with a graphic visualization | |
| CN107679065A (en) | Method for exhibiting data, device and computer-readable recording medium | |
| AU2009200674A1 (en) | Data management system | |
| Seda et al. | Disclosure of fraud control information in annual reports as a means of discharging public accountability | |
| US20080228815A1 (en) | Methods and systems for managing risk | |
| CN106339503B (en) | Interactive display method based on elements and relations | |
| US9053484B1 (en) | Computer implemented system for forming an accelerated compliance plan with a graphic visualization | |
| NZ628759A (en) | A method of associating entities | |
| Ward et al. | Recognizing the impact of e-discovery amendments on electronic records management | |
| US7996299B2 (en) | Trade services management system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PSEA | Patent sealed | ||
| LAPS | Patent lapsed |