Sciacovelli et al., 2011 - Google Patents
Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: From theory to practice: Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “laboratory Errors and Patient Safety”Sciacovelli et al., 2011
View PDF- Document ID
- 3976791971610280729
- Author
- Sciacovelli L
- O’Kane M
- Skaik Y
- Caciagli P
- Pellegrini C
- Da Rin G
- Ivanov A
- Ghys T
- Plebani M
- IFCC WG-LEPS
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
External Links
Snippet
Abstract Background: The adoption of Quality Indicators (QIs) has prompted the development of tools to measure and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of laboratory testing, first in the hospital setting and subsequently in ambulatory and other care settings …
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/36—Computer-assisted acquisition of medical data, e.g. computerised clinical trials or questionnaires
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
- G06Q10/105—Human resources
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N35/00—Automatic analysis not limited to methods or materials provided for in any single one of groups G01N1/00 - G01N33/00; Handling materials therefor
- G01N35/00584—Control arrangements for automatic analysers
- G01N35/00594—Quality control, including calibration or testing of components of the analyser
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sciacovelli et al. | Quality Indicators in Laboratory Medicine: From theory to practice: Preliminary data from the IFCC Working Group Project “laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” | |
Cornes et al. | Monitoring and reporting of preanalytical errors in laboratory medicine: the UK situation | |
Plebani et al. | Quality indicators in laboratory medicine: a fundamental tool for quality and patient safety | |
Badrick et al. | Patient-based real-time quality control: review and recommendations | |
Westgard et al. | Quality control review: implementing a scientifically based quality control system | |
Najat | Prevalence of pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry diagnostic labs in Sulaimani city of Iraqi Kurdistan | |
Plebani et al. | Laboratory network of excellence: enhancing patient safety and service effectiveness | |
Powell et al. | Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls | |
Jiang et al. | Application of failure mode and effects analysis in a clinical chemistry laboratory | |
Grecu et al. | Quality indicators in the preanalytical phase of testing in a stat laboratory | |
Sciacovelli et al. | External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation | |
Price et al. | Improving the quality of point-of-care testing | |
Aita et al. | Extra-analytical quality indicators–where to now? | |
Howanitz et al. | Clinical laboratory quality control: a costly process now out of control | |
Camus et al. | ASVCP quality assurance guidelines: external quality assessment and comparative testing for reference and in‐clinic laboratories | |
CN111406294B (en) | Automatically generating rules for laboratory instruments | |
Rizk et al. | Evaluating laboratory key performance using quality indicators in Alexandria University Hospital Clinical Chemistry Laboratories | |
Ørvim Sølvik et al. | Quality control of Norwegian pharmacy HbA1c testing: a modest beginning | |
Brooks | Performance-driven quality control | |
Henderson et al. | How should you assess glycemic control if the hemoglobin A1c is inaccurate or uninterpretable? | |
Badrick et al. | Philippines Diagnostic Pathology Laboratory Benchmarking | |
van Rossum | Optimization and validation of limit check error-detection performance using a laboratory-specific data-simulation approach: a prerequisite for an evidence-based practice | |
Glencross et al. | Categorizing and establishing CD4 service equivalency: Testing of residual, archived external quality assessment scheme sample panels enables accelerated virtual peer laboratory review | |
McFarlane et al. | Internal Quality Control Practices in Coagulation Laboratories: recommendations based on a patterns‐of‐practice survey | |
Shaikh et al. | Performance evaluation of a coagulation laboratory using Sigma metrics |