Auvinet et al., 2017 - Google Patents
Validity and sensitivity of the longitudinal asymmetry index to detect gait asymmetry using Microsoft Kinect dataAuvinet et al., 2017
View PDF- Document ID
- 3936411087341426382
- Author
- Auvinet E
- Multon F
- Manning V
- Meunier J
- Cobb J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Gait & posture
External Links
Snippet
Gait asymmetry information is a key point in disease screening and follow-up. Constant Relative Phase (CRP) has been used to quantify within-stride asymmetry index, which requires noise-free and accurate motion capture, which is difficult to obtain in clinical …
- 230000005021 gait 0 title abstract description 108
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
- A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1126—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique
- A61B5/1127—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb using a particular sensing technique using markers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1116—Determining posture transitions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6829—Foot or ankle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6802—Sensor mounted on worn items
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/107—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Auvinet et al. | Validity and sensitivity of the longitudinal asymmetry index to detect gait asymmetry using Microsoft Kinect data | |
Nüesch et al. | Measuring joint kinematics of treadmill walking and running: Comparison between an inertial sensor based system and a camera-based system | |
Klöpfer-Krämer et al. | Gait analysis–Available platforms for outcome assessment | |
Washabaugh et al. | Comparing the accuracy of open-source pose estimation methods for measuring gait kinematics | |
Mentiplay et al. | Gait assessment using the Microsoft Xbox One Kinect: Concurrent validity and inter-day reliability of spatiotemporal and kinematic variables | |
Yeung et al. | Evaluation of the Microsoft Kinect as a clinical assessment tool of body sway | |
Song et al. | Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements | |
Schmitz et al. | The measurement of in vivo joint angles during a squat using a single camera markerless motion capture system as compared to a marker based system | |
Bolink et al. | Validity of an inertial measurement unit to assess pelvic orientation angles during gait, sit–stand transfers and step-up transfers: Comparison with an optoelectronic motion capture system | |
Mundt et al. | Assessment of the measurement accuracy of inertial sensors during different tasks of daily living | |
Clark et al. | Validity of the Microsoft Kinect for assessment of postural control | |
Mousavi et al. | Validity and reliability of a smartphone motion analysis app for lower limb kinematics during treadmill running | |
Mills et al. | Repeatability of 3D gait kinematics obtained from an electromagnetic tracking system during treadmill locomotion | |
Thirunarayan et al. | Comparison of three methods for estimating vertical displacement of center of mass during level walking in patients | |
Stokic et al. | Agreement between temporospatial gait parameters of an electronic walkway and a motion capture system in healthy and chronic stroke populations | |
Milner et al. | A kinematic method to detect foot contact during running for all foot strike patterns | |
Kuster et al. | Accuracy of KinectOne to quantify kinematics of the upper body | |
Oh et al. | Validity of the Microsoft Kinect™ in assessing spatiotemporal and lower extremity kinematics during stair ascent and descent in healthy young individuals | |
Littrell et al. | Development and assessment of a low-cost clinical gait analysis system | |
WO2015162158A1 (en) | Human motion tracking | |
Fan et al. | IMU-based knee flexion, abduction and internal rotation estimation during drop landing and cutting tasks | |
Ohtsu et al. | Investigation of balance strategy over gait cycle based on margin of stability | |
Berner et al. | Kinematics and temporospatial parameters during gait from inertial motion capture in adults with and without HIV: A validity and reliability study | |
Nazarahari et al. | Foot angular kinematics measured with inertial measurement units: A reliable criterion for real-time gait event detection | |
Milner et al. | Reliability and minimal detectable difference in multisegment foot kinematics during shod walking and running |