Smeenk et al., 2016 - Google Patents
Writers, readers, and erasers of histone ubiquitylation in DNA double-strand break repairSmeenk et al., 2016
View HTML- Document ID
- 3859331209085408570
- Author
- Smeenk G
- Mailand N
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Frontiers in genetics
External Links
Snippet
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly cytotoxic DNA lesions, whose faulty repair may alter the content and organization of cellular genomes. To counteract this threat, numerous signaling and repair proteins are recruited hierarchically to the chromatin areas surrounding …
- 238000010798 ubiquitination 0 title abstract description 89
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES OR MICRO-ORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or micro-organisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Smeenk et al. | Writers, readers, and erasers of histone ubiquitylation in DNA double-strand break repair | |
Brown et al. | Ubiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response | |
Franz et al. | Ring of change: CDC48/p97 drives protein dynamics at chromatin | |
Daley et al. | 53BP1, BRCA1, and the choice between recombination and end joining at DNA double-strand breaks | |
Polo et al. | Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications | |
Dantuma et al. | Spatiotemporal regulation of posttranslational modifications in the DNA damage response | |
Schwertman et al. | Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers | |
Densham et al. | Moving mountains—the BRCA1 promotion of DNA resection | |
Mancini et al. | The multi-functionality of UHRF1: epigenome maintenance and preservation of genome integrity | |
Goytisolo et al. | Many ways to telomere dysfunction: in vivo studies using mouse models | |
Bartocci et al. | Put a RING on it: regulation and inhibition of RNF8 and RNF168 RING finger E3 ligases at DNA damage sites | |
Huen et al. | BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity | |
Smeenk et al. | Poly (ADP-ribosyl) ation links the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5/SNF2H to RNF168-dependent DNA damage signaling | |
Polato et al. | CtIP-mediated resection is essential for viability and can operate independently of BRCA1 | |
Kieffer et al. | Immediate-early, early, and late responses to DNA double stranded breaks | |
Li et al. | Links between genome integrity and BRCA1 tumor suppression | |
Vissers et al. | The emerging role of Polycomb repressors in the response to DNA damage | |
Cinesi et al. | Contracting CAG/CTG repeats using the CRISPR-Cas9 nickase | |
Smeenk et al. | The chromatin response to DNA breaks: leaving a mark on genome integrity | |
Liu et al. | A fine-scale dissection of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery and its implications for breast cancer therapy | |
Torrecilla et al. | The role of ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in chromatin dynamics after DNA double strand breaks | |
Paulsen et al. | The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork | |
Hartlerode et al. | Mechanisms of double-strand break repair in somatic mammalian cells | |
Wilson et al. | Reading chromatin signatures after DNA double-strand breaks | |
Lu et al. | Human RecQ helicases in DNA double-strand break repair |