Lindley et al., 2001 - Google Patents
Audiologist-versus patient-driven hearing aid fitting protocolsLindley et al., 2001
- Document ID
- 2897717312612714346
- Author
- Lindley G
- Palmer C
- Durrant J
- Pratt S
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Seminars in Hearing
External Links
Snippet
Past research has demonstrated that predicted speech intelligibility is higher when hearing aids are adjusted using an audiologist-driven (AD) fitting protocol versus a patient-driven (PD) fitting protocol. This results from a greater amount of high-frequency amplification. Use …
- 230000013707 sensory perception of sound 0 title abstract description 204
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
- H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
- H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/75—Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/30—Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
- H04R25/305—Self-monitoring or self-testing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/40—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
- H04R25/407—Circuits for combining signals of a plurality of transducers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/55—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using an external connection, either wireless or wired
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/60—Mounting, assembling or interconnection of hearing aid parts, e.g. inside tips, housing or to ossicles; Apparatus or processes therefor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Simpson et al. | Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms: Resultados de la compresión de frecuencia en oyentes con audiogramas de pendiente pronunciada | |
| Keidser et al. | NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments | |
| Kuk et al. | Efficacy of linear frequency transposition on consonant identification in quiet and in noise | |
| Marrone et al. | Evaluating the benefit of hearing aids in solving the cocktail party problem | |
| Cox et al. | Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss | |
| Davies-Venn et al. | Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss | |
| Keidser et al. | Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users | |
| Keidser et al. | Comparing loudness normalization (IHAFF) with speech intelligibility maximization (NAL-NL1) when implemented in a two-channel device | |
| Marriage et al. | Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users | |
| James et al. | An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings | |
| Dawson et al. | Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in Nucleus cochlear implants | |
| Crukley et al. | Children’s speech recognition and loudness perception with the desired sensation level v5 quiet and noise prescriptions | |
| Salorio-Corbetto et al. | Quality ratings of frequency-compressed speech by participants with extensive high-frequency dead regions in the cochlea | |
| Bruno et al. | Frequency-lowering processing to improve speech-in-noise intelligibility in patients with age-related hearing loss | |
| Simpson et al. | Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss | |
| Bozorg-Grayeli et al. | Clinical evaluation of the xDP output compression strategy for cochlear implants | |
| Rahne et al. | Speech perception and hearing effort using a new active middle ear implant audio processor | |
| Flynn et al. | Multiple-channel non-linear power hearing instruments for children with severe hearing impairment: long-term follow-up | |
| Moore et al. | Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid: Comparación de dos procesos de adaptación de auxiliares auditivos con compresión multicanal | |
| McDermott et al. | The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing | |
| Conrad et al. | Perceived occlusion and comfort in receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids | |
| Lindley et al. | Audiologist-versus patient-driven hearing aid fitting protocols | |
| Moore et al. | Evaluation of the CAMEQ2-HF method for fitting hearing aids with multichannel amplitude compression | |
| Stone et al. | Measuring access to high-modulation-rate envelope speech cues in clinically fitted auditory prostheses | |
| Lindley | Adaptation to loudness: implications for hearing aid fittings |