Miller et al., 2019 - Google Patents
TT03-Computing the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) for Turbo Machinery ProtectionMiller et al., 2019
View PDF- Document ID
- 2644919483619983893
- Author
- Miller C
- Kassie L
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
SIL has become the new standard by which industry, manufacturers, and end users will be held to by regulators as good engineering practice. Specifically supporting turbomachinery, the API670 Machinery Protective Systems (5th edition, 2014)[R1] standard has embraced …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 46
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
- G05B23/0283—Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
- G05B23/0256—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults injecting test signals and analyzing monitored process response, e.g. injecting the test signal while interrupting the normal operation of the monitored system; superimposing the test signal onto a control signal during normal operation of the monitored system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
- G05B2219/32234—Maintenance planning
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP6250942B2 (en) | System and method for operation with improved reliability | |
| EP2869152B1 (en) | Systems and methods for improved reliability operations | |
| US9122253B2 (en) | Systems and methods for dynamic risk derivation | |
| US9280617B2 (en) | Systems and methods for improved reliability operations | |
| Zhou et al. | A dynamic reliability-centered maintenance analysis method for natural gas compressor station based on diagnostic and prognostic technology | |
| Rabah et al. | Optimization of safety instrumented system performance and maintenance costs in Algerian oil and gas facilities | |
| Miller et al. | TT03-Computing the Safety Integrity Level (SIL) for Turbo Machinery Protection | |
| Lundteigen | Safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry: Concepts and methods for safety and reliability assessments in design and operation | |
| Bitanov | Reliability study of subsea control module with focus on statistical methods | |
| Miller et al. | Assessing and computing the safety integrity level (SIL) for turbo machinery protection | |
| Kafka | Probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plants | |
| Chastain‐Knight | Confirming the safety instrumented system layer of protection | |
| Lew et al. | Computerized operator support system for nuclear power plant hybrid main control room | |
| Dowell III et al. | SIL‐3, SIL‐2, and unicorns (there is a high probability your SIL 2 and SIL 3 SIFs have no better performance than SIL 1) | |
| Zhang | Prognostics and health management of safety-instrumented systems: Approaches of degradation modeling and decision-making | |
| Lundteigen | Safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry | |
| Yuan et al. | Study on system testing approach-based risk evaluation of subsea tree | |
| Chastain‐Knight | Systematic errors that compromise integrity of safety instrumented systems | |
| Brighenti et al. | Article Not peer-reviewed version | |
| Kannan et al. | Incident Learning: Addressing the Functional Safety Life Cycle Requirements in PDO | |
| Massello et al. | SIL-3, SIL-2, and Unicorns (There Is a High Probability Your SIL 2 and SIL 3 SIFs Have No Better Performance Than SIL 1) | |
| Johnson et al. | PARCEL: Using Software Development Standards to Guide the Investigation of Computer-Related Incidents and Accidents | |
| Hildenbrandt | Reducing Project Lifecycle Cost with an Integrated Safety Lifecycle Suite | |
| Miller et al. | ISA84/IEC61511 SIS Functional Safety Compliance: It’sa Journey Worth Taking | |
| McCarthy et al. | Light Water Reactor Sustainability Program Integrated Program Plan |