Laurenzi et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Biventricular upgrading in patients with conventional pacing system and congestive heart failure: results and response predictorsLaurenzi et al., 2007
View PDF- Document ID
- 2613006952150015964
- Author
- Laurenzi F
- Achilli A
- Avella A
- Peraldo C
- Orazi S
- Perego G
- Cesario A
- Valsecchi S
- De Santo T
- Puglisi A
- Tondo C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
External Links
Snippet
Background: There are few studies on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with preexisting right ventricular (RV) pacing. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of CRT upgrading in RV‐paced patients and the predictivity of …
- 206010007559 Cardiac failure congestive 0 title description 4
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/362—Heart stimulators
- A61N1/365—Heart stimulators controlled by a physiological parameter, e.g. heart potential
- A61N1/368—Heart stimulators controlled by a physiological parameter, e.g. heart potential comprising more than one electrode co-operating with different heart regions
- A61N1/3684—Heart stimulators controlled by a physiological parameter, e.g. heart potential comprising more than one electrode co-operating with different heart regions for stimulating the heart at multiple sites of the ventricle or the atrium, e.g. biventricular stimulation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/362—Heart stimulators
- A61N1/365—Heart stimulators controlled by a physiological parameter, e.g. heart potential
- A61N1/36514—Heart stimulators controlled by a physiological parameter, e.g. heart potential controlled by a physiological quantity other than heart potential, e.g. blood pressure
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/362—Heart stimulators
- A61N1/3627—Heart stimulators for treating a mechanical deficiency of the heart, e.g. congestive heart failure or cardionmyopathy
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/362—Heart stimulators
- A61N1/37—Monitoring; Protecting
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/38—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for producing shock effects
- A61N1/39—Heart defibrillators
- A61N1/3956—Implantable devices for applying electric shocks to the heart, e.g. for cardioversion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0402—Electrocardiography, i.e. ECG
- A61B5/0452—Detecting specific parameters of the electrocardiograph cycle
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Mascioli et al. | Electrocardiographic criteria of true left bundle branch block: a simple sign to predict a better clinical and instrumental response to CRT | |
Horwich et al. | Effects of resynchronization therapy on cardiac function in pacemaker patients “upgraded” to biventricular devices | |
Rickard et al. | The QRS narrowing index predicts reverse left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Dupont et al. | Differential response to cardiac resynchronization therapy and clinical outcomes according to QRS morphology and QRS duration | |
Keene et al. | Rationale and design of the randomized multicentre His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE‐HF) trial | |
XU et al. | Cardiac resynchronization therapy: do women benefit more than men? | |
Pastore et al. | Left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular apical pacing: relevance of baseline assessment | |
Scuteri et al. | Relevance of echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular function in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Rogers et al. | Effect of biventricular pacing on symptoms and cardiac remodelling in patients with end‐stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy | |
Celikyurt et al. | Number of leads with fragmented QRS predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Tereshchenko et al. | Antiarrhythmic effect of reverse electrical remodeling associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Laurenzi et al. | Biventricular upgrading in patients with conventional pacing system and congestive heart failure: results and response predictors | |
Celikyurt et al. | Association between resolution of fragmented QRS and response to cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Auger et al. | Effect of induced LV dyssynchrony by right ventricular apical pacing on all‐cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates at long‐term follow‐up | |
Boriani et al. | Impact of Mitral Regurgitation on the Outcome of Patients Treated with CRT‐D: Data from the InSync ICD Italian Registry | |
Leyva et al. | Female gender is associated with a better outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Gold et al. | Effect of interventricular electrical delay on atrioventricular optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Yeim et al. | Predictors of a positive response to biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure and ventricular conduction delay | |
Grieco et al. | Impact of His bundle pacing on right ventricular performance in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation | |
Lenarczyk et al. | Effect of cardiac resynchronization on gradient reduction in patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: preliminary study | |
Kirubakaran et al. | Male gender and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease predict a poor clinical response in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronisation therapy | |
Montenegro Camanho et al. | Clinical outcomes and mortality in old and very old patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy | |
Gasparini et al. | Three years of cardiac resynchronization therapy: could superior benefits be obtained in patients with heart failure and narrow QRS? | |
Adelstein et al. | Right atrial pacing and the risk of postimplant atrial fibrillation in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients | |
Valzania et al. | Left ventricular versus biventricular pacing: a randomized comparative study evaluating mid‐term electromechanical and clinical effects |