Kjeldstad et al., 2023 - Google Patents
Evaluating the existing watchkeeping regulations as a baseline for developing functional requirements and performance criteria for uncrewed vesselsKjeldstad et al., 2023
View PDF- Document ID
- 2458102805222455929
- Author
- Kjeldstad B
- KUFOALOR D
- Ulvensøen J
- Utne I
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The 33 th European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL2023), Southampton, UK: ESRA
External Links
Snippet
The development and deployment of uncrewed surface vessels and vessels with some degree of autonomy is seeing a rapid increase. Use cases cover the offshore industry, aquaculture, seabed mapping, water column monitoring, public transport, cargo freight …
- 230000006870 function 0 abstract description 17
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G8/00—Underwater vessels, e.g. submarines; Equipment specially adapted therefor
- B63G8/14—Control of attitude or depth
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wright | Unmanned and autonomous ships: an overview of mass | |
| KR101693982B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for vessel collision avoidance | |
| Aps et al. | Systems-theoretic process analysis of maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) | |
| Rylander et al. | Autonomous safety on vessels | |
| WO2018150101A1 (en) | System and method for managing navigation plan of a marine vessel | |
| Fenton et al. | Ships without crews: IMO and UK responses to cybersecurity, technology, law and regulation of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) | |
| Bolbot et al. | A method to identify and rank objects and hazardous interactions affecting autonomous ships navigation | |
| Baldauf et al. | Potentials of e-navigation–enhanced support for collision avoidance | |
| Woerner | COLREGS-compliant autonomous collision avoidance using multi-objective optimization with interval programming | |
| Lazarowska | Safe trajectory planning for maritime surface ships | |
| Li | On the legal status of unmanned ships | |
| Liu | Autonomous vessel technology, safety, and ocean impacts | |
| Kjeldstad et al. | Evaluating the existing watchkeeping regulations as a baseline for developing functional requirements and performance criteria for uncrewed vessels | |
| Jo et al. | Study on the potential gaps and themes identified by IMO Regulatory Scoping Exercise (RSE) for the use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) | |
| Denker et al. | E-Navigation based cooperative collision avoidance at sea: The MTCAS approach | |
| Guerra | Ready about, Here comes AI: Potential maritime law challenges for autonomous shipping | |
| Kotzé et al. | Use of uncertainty zones for vessel operation in inland waterways | |
| Ugé et al. | Learning to swim-how operational design parameters determine the grade of autonomy of ships | |
| Showalter et al. | Legal and engineering challenges to widespread adoption of unmanned maritime vehicles | |
| Porathe | Deconflicting maritime autonomous surface ship traffic using moving havens | |
| Zwolak et al. | The assessment of unmanned vessel operation in heavy traffic areas. case study of the North Sea Crossing by unmanned surface vessel sea-kit | |
| Kim et al. | A study on the verification of collision avoidance support system in real voyages | |
| Eder | Unmanned vessels: challenges ahead | |
| Helmer | Unmanned Surface Vessels as a safer and more sustainable alternative for maritime operations within the Offshore Safety Zone | |
| Denker et al. | MTCAS-An assistance system for maritime collision avoidance |