Ludvigsen et al., 1990 - Google Patents
Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speechLudvigsen et al., 1990
- Document ID
- 1991907832484175680
- Author
- Ludvigsen C
- Elberling C
- Keidser G
- Poulsen T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Acta oto-laryngologica
External Links
Snippet
Speech in various noise backgrounds was processed through four different non-linear devices and the intelligibility of the processed signals was predicted from the Speech Transmission Index (STI). A novel calculation method was applied in order to avoid artifacts …
- 238000004364 calculation method 0 abstract description 16
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/50—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics
- H04R25/505—Customised settings for obtaining desired overall acoustical characteristics using digital signal processing
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Festen et al. | Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech‐reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing | |
| Kates et al. | The hearing-aid speech perception index (HASPI) | |
| Ludvigsen et al. | Prediction of intelligibility of non-linearly processed speech | |
| Ando | Subjective preference in relation to objective parameters of music sound fields with a single echo | |
| Ando | A theory of primary sensations and spatial sensations measuring environmental noise | |
| Karjalainen | A new auditory model for the evaluation of sound quality of audio systems | |
| Kollmeier et al. | Perception of speech and sound | |
| Kates et al. | Multichannel dynamic-range compression using digital frequency warping | |
| Cox et al. | Distribution of short‐term rms levels in conversational speech | |
| Moore et al. | Simulation of the effects of loud ness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise | |
| Breebaart et al. | Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters | |
| Biberger et al. | The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking | |
| Rennies et al. | Loudness of speech and speech-like signals | |
| Kates | Modeling the effects of single-microphone noise-suppression | |
| Plomp | Perception of speech as a modulated signal | |
| Stelmachowicz et al. | Complex and pure-tone signals in the evaluation of hearing-aid characteristics | |
| Genuit | Sound quality aspects for environmental noise | |
| Oberfeld | Are temporal loudness weights under top-down control? Effects of trial-by-trial feedback | |
| Payton et al. | Computing the STI using speech as a probe stimulus | |
| Lum et al. | Perception of speech and non-speech sounds by listeners with real and simulated sensorineural hearing loss | |
| Montgomery | Development of a model for generating synthetic animated lip shapes | |
| VanDerveer | Confusion errors in identification of environmental sounds | |
| Nikhil et al. | Impact of ERB and bark scales on perceptual distortion based near-end speech enhancement | |
| Jamieson et al. | Electroacoustic evaluation of assistive hearing devices | |
| Stuart | Implementation and measurement with respect to human auditory capabilities |