[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Reardon et al., 2014 - Google Patents

Low energy CO2 capture enabled by biocatalyst delivery system

Reardon et al., 2014

View PDF
Document ID
1927142347879580770
Author
Reardon J
Bucholz T
Hulvey M
Tuttle J
Shaffer A
Pulvirenti D
Weber L
Killian K
Zaks A
Publication year
Publication venue
Energy Procedia

External Links

Snippet

This work presents research and development progress to improve biocatalysts, solvents, and system integration to reduce the cost of CO 2 capture from flue gas. Laboratory data and field demonstration illustrate the potential of biocatalyst-enhanced CO 2 capture from coal …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C10/00—CO2 capture or storage
    • Y02C10/04—Capture by chemical separation
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02C—CAPTURE, STORAGE, SEQUESTRATION OR DISPOSAL OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG]
    • Y02C10/00—CO2 capture or storage
    • Y02C10/10—Capture by membranes or diffusion
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46—Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/62—Carbon oxides
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D53/00—Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34—Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74—General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01D—SEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00—Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/50—Carbon oxides
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GASES [GHG] EMISSION, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/50—Fuel cells

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Reardon et al. Low energy CO2 capture enabled by biocatalyst delivery system
Zhang et al. Kinetics, thermodynamics, and mechanism of a novel biphasic solvent for CO2 capture from flue gas
Nwaoha et al. Carbon dioxide (CO2) capture: Absorption-desorption capabilities of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), piperazine (PZ) and monoethanolamine (MEA) tri-solvent blends
Dods et al. Deep CCS: moving beyond 90% carbon dioxide capture
Zhang et al. Kinetic performance of CO2 absorption into a potassium carbonate solution promoted with the enzyme carbonic anhydrase: Comparison with a monoethanolamine solution
Dinca et al. Benchmarking of the pre/post-combustion chemical absorption for the CO2 capture
Bolton et al. 3D printed structures for optimized carbon capture technology in packed bed columns
Herzog Direct air capture
Xu et al. Experimental study of regeneration performance of aqueous N, N-diethylethanolamine solution in a column packed with Dixon ring random packing
Balsora et al. Solubility of CO2 in an aqueous blend of diethanolamine and trisodium phosphate
Nagy et al. Effect of fossil fuels on the parameters of CO2 capture
Singh et al. Selection of amine combination for CO2 capture in a packed bed scrubber
Guerras et al. Optimal gas treatment and coal blending for reduced emissions in power plants: A case study in Northwest Spain
Dinca et al. Absorber design for the improvement of the efficiency of post-combustion CO2 capture
Mondal Solubility of carbon dioxide in an aqueous blend of diethanolamine and piperazine
Zheng et al. Oxygen removal from oxy-combustion flue gas for CO2 purification via catalytic methane oxidation
Sood et al. Recent advancements in ionic liquid based carbon capture technologies
Pratschner et al. Power-to-Green Methanol via CO2 Hydrogenation—A Concept Study including Oxyfuel Fluidized Bed Combustion of Biomass
Mohamadi-Baghmolaei et al. Exergy and exergoeconomic assessment of an acid gas removal unit in a gas refinery plant
Dinul et al. Comparison of NaOH and Na2CO3 as absorbents for CO2 absorption in carbon capture and storage technology
Talei et al. Oxyfuel Combustion Makes Carbon Capture More Efficient
Mirzaei et al. CO2 absorption/desorption in aqueous single and novel hybrid solvents of glycerol and monoethanolamine in a pilot-scale packed bed column
Yu et al. Multi-field synergy study of CO2 capture process by chemical absorption
Pan et al. Absorption of NO by using aqueous KMnO4/(NH4) 2CO3 solutions
Lemaire et al. Development of HiCapt+ TM process for CO2 capture from lab to industrial pilot plant