[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Cai et al., 2013 - Google Patents

Evaluating discomfort glare from non-uniform electric light sources

Cai et al., 2013

Document ID
18433217950718449192
Author
Cai H
Chung T
Publication year
Publication venue
Lighting Research & Technology

External Links

Snippet

This study tested the appropriateness of unified glare rating (UGR), CIE glare index (CGI), British glare index (BGI), and visual comfort probability (VCP) for evaluating discomfort glare from common non-uniform electric light sources. An experiment was conducted in a …
Continue reading at journals.sagepub.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/20Education

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Cai et al. Evaluating discomfort glare from non-uniform electric light sources
Boyce et al. Visual discomfort indoors
Wienold et al. Cross-validation and robustness of daylight glare metrics
Clear Discomfort glare: What do we actually know?
Inanici Evaluation of high dynamic range photography as a luminance data acquisition system
Rockcastle et al. Contrast measures for predicting perceptual effects of daylight in architectural renderings
Cuttle A new direction for general lighting practice
Suk et al. Investigation of Evalglare software, daylight glare probability and high dynamic range imaging for daylight glare analysis
Mardaljevic et al. A framework for predicting the non-visual effects of daylight–Part II: The simulation model
Xia et al. Light diffuseness metric part 1: Theory
Kent et al. Discomfort glare and time of day
Rockcastle et al. Comparing perceptions of a dimmable LED lighting system between a real space and a virtual reality display
Fotios et al. Effects of outdoor lighting on judgements of emotion and gaze direction
Yang et al. Lighting and recognition of emotion conveyed by facial expressions
Yang et al. Assessing glare. Part 1: Comparing uniform and non-uniform LED luminaires
Kaya et al. Effects of daylight design features on visitors’ satisfaction of museums
Chetverikov et al. Seeing “the Dress” in the right light: Perceived colors and inferred light sources
Jakubiec et al. Long-term visual quality evaluations correlate with climate-based daylighting metrics in tropical offices–A field study
Rodriquez et al. Tolerance of discomfort glare from a large area source for work on a visual display
Cai Luminance gradient for evaluating lighting
Duff et al. On the calculation and measurement of mean room surface exitance
Boyce et al. LRT symposium ‘Better metrics for better lighting’–a summary
Yang et al. Assessing glare, Part 3: Glare sources having different colours
Scheir et al. A psychophysical model for visual discomfort based on receptive fields
Yang et al. Assessing glare. Part 2: Modifying Unified Glare Rating for uniform and non-uniform LED luminaires