Küpker et al., 2002 - Google Patents
The use of cryopreserved mature and immature testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: risks and limitationsKüpker et al., 2002
- Document ID
- 18389054170722560974
- Author
- Küpker W
- Al-Hasani S
- Johannisson R
- Sandmann J
- Ludwig M
- Jocham D
- Diedrich K
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Seminars in reproductive medicine
External Links
Snippet
Treatment of severe male subfertility has become available since the intracytoplasmic injection of a single sperm into an oocyte was successfully applied for the first time in 1992. Moreover, with the use of fresh and cryopreserved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa …
- 239000007924 injection 0 title abstract description 111
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICRO-ORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING OR MAINTAINING MICRO-ORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues ; Not used, see subgroups
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0608—Germ cells ; Not used, see subgroups
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICRO-ORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING OR MAINTAINING MICRO-ORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N5/00—Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
- C12N5/06—Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues ; Not used, see subgroups
- C12N5/0602—Vertebrate cells
- C12N5/0603—Embryonic cells ; Embryoid bodies
- C12N5/0605—Cells from extra-embryonic tissues, e.g. placenta, amnion, yolk sac, Wharton's jelly
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
- G01N1/30—Staining; Impregnating Fixation; Dehydration; Multistep processes for preparing samples of tissue, cell or nucleic acid material and the like for analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
- G01N33/689—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to pregnancy or the gonads
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Palermo et al. | Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men | |
Küpker et al. | Use of frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection | |
Sousa et al. | Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen–thawed sperm and spermatids | |
Romany et al. | Removal of annexin V–positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males | |
Donnez et al. | Gonadal cryopreservation in the young patient with gynaecological malignancy | |
Cayan et al. | A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples | |
Sousa et al. | Clinical efficacy of spermatid conception: analysis using a new spermatid classification scheme | |
GIL-SALOM et al. | Testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a chance of fertility in nonobstructive azoospermia | |
Chan et al. | Nonobstructive azoospermia | |
Gianaroli et al. | Diagnostic testicular biopsy and cryopreservation of testicular tissue as an alternative to repeated surgical openings in the treatment of azoospermic men | |
Vicdan et al. | Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection using fresh and cryopreserved‐thawed testıcular spermatozoa in 83 azoospermic men with Klinefelter syndrome | |
Al-Hasani et al. | Intracytoplasmic injection of round and elongated spermatids from azoospermic patients: results and review | |
Cui et al. | Comparison of the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection between spermatozoa retrieved from testicular biopsy and from ejaculate in cryptozoospermia patients | |
Tesarik et al. | In-vitro spermatogenesis resumption in men with maturation arrest: relationship with in-vivo blocking stage and serum FSH | |
Aydos et al. | Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases | |
Balaban et al. | Progression to the blastocyst stage of embryos derived from testicular round spermatids | |
An et al. | Outcome of oocyte vitrification combined with microdissection testicular sperm extraction and aspiration for assisted reproduction in men | |
Tesarik et al. | In vitro culture facilitates the selection of healthy spermatids for assisted reproduction | |
Lan et al. | Clinical outcomes and live birth rate resulted from microdissection testicular sperm extraction with ICSI-IVF in non-obstructive azoospermia: A single-center cohort study | |
Angelopoulos et al. | A simple and objective approach to identifying human round spermatids. | |
Küpker et al. | The use of cryopreserved mature and immature testicular spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection: risks and limitations | |
Ulug et al. | Outcomes in couples undergoing ICSI: comparison between fresh and frozen–thawed surgically retrieved spermatozoa | |
Monzó et al. | Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermic patients: stressing the liaison between the urologist and reproductive medicine specialist | |
van der Ven et al. | Fertilization of human oocytes in capillary tubes with very small numbers of spermatozoa | |
Lin et al. | Failed sperm retrieval from severely oligospermic or non-obstructive azoospermic patients on oocyte retrieval day: Emergent oocyte cryopreservation is a feasible strategy |