O'Kelly et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Ability of fabric face mask materials to filter ultrafine particles at coughing velocityO'Kelly et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 18362368225239688163
- Author
- O'Kelly E
- Pirog S
- Ward J
- Clarkson P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- BMJ open
External Links
Snippet
Objective We examined the ability of fabrics which might be used to create home-made face masks to filter out ultrafine (0.02–0.1 µm) particles at the velocity of adult human coughing. Methods Twenty commonly available fabrics and materials were evaluated for their ability to …
- 239000004744 fabric 0 title abstract description 74
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D13/00—Professional, industrial, or sporting protective garments, e.g. garments affording protection against blows or punches, surgeon's gowns
- A41D13/05—Professional, industrial, or sporting protective garments, e.g. garments affording protection against blows or punches, surgeon's gowns protecting only a particular body part
- A41D13/11—Protective face masks, e.g. for surgical use, or for use in foul atmospheres
- A41D13/1192—Protective face masks, e.g. for surgical use, or for use in foul atmospheres with antimicrobial agent
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A41—WEARING APPAREL
- A41D—OUTERWEAR; PROTECTIVE GARMENTS; ACCESSORIES
- A41D13/00—Professional, industrial, or sporting protective garments, e.g. garments affording protection against blows or punches, surgeon's gowns
- A41D13/05—Professional, industrial, or sporting protective garments, e.g. garments affording protection against blows or punches, surgeon's gowns protecting only a particular body part
- A41D13/11—Protective face masks, e.g. for surgical use, or for use in foul atmospheres
- A41D13/1107—Protective face masks, e.g. for surgical use, or for use in foul atmospheres characterised by their shape
- A41D13/113—Protective face masks, e.g. for surgical use, or for use in foul atmospheres characterised by their shape with a vertical fold or weld
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61M—DEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
- A61M16/00—Devices for influencing the respiratory system of patients by gas treatment, e.g. mouth-to-mouth respiration; Tracheal tubes
- A61M16/10—Preparation of respiratory gases or vapours
- A61M16/105—Filters
- A61M16/106—Filters in a path
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62B—DEVICES, APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR LIFE-SAVING
- A62B23/00—Filters for breathing-protection purposes
- A62B23/02—Filters for breathing-protection purposes for respirators
- A62B23/025—Filters for breathing-protection purposes for respirators the filter having substantially the shape of a mask
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
O'Kelly et al. | Ability of fabric face mask materials to filter ultrafine particles at coughing velocity | |
Pan et al. | Inward and outward effectiveness of cloth masks, a surgical mask, and a face shield | |
Duncan et al. | The protective performance of reusable cloth face masks, disposable procedure masks, KN95 masks and N95 respirators: Filtration and total inward leakage | |
Forouzandeh et al. | Face masks and respirators in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of the standards and testing methods | |
Kwong et al. | Review of the breathability and filtration efficiency of common household materials for face masks | |
Clase et al. | Forgotten technology in the COVID-19 pandemic: filtration properties of cloth and cloth masks—a narrative review | |
Park | Personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
Bhattacharjee et al. | Last-resort strategies during mask shortages: optimal design features of cloth masks and decontamination of disposable masks during the COVID-19 pandemic | |
Hao et al. | Factors influencing the filtration performance of homemade face masks | |
Jung et al. | Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs | |
Kumar et al. | The perspective of fluid flow behavior of respiratory droplets and aerosols through the facemasks in context of SARS-CoV-2 | |
Rogak et al. | Properties of materials considered for improvised masks | |
Beesoon et al. | Universal masking during COVID-19 pandemic: Can textile engineering help public health? Narrative review of the evidence | |
Bagheri et al. | Filtration efficiency, breathability, and reusability of improvised materials for face masks | |
Guha et al. | Comprehensive characterization of protective face coverings made from household fabrics | |
Wang et al. | Selection of homemade mask materials for preventing transmission of COVID-19: A laboratory study | |
Maurer et al. | Community masks during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: Filtration efficacy and air resistance | |
Lindsley et al. | Efficacy of universal masking for source control and personal protection from simulated cough and exhaled aerosols in a room | |
Ramirez et al. | Filter penetration and breathing resistance evaluation of respirators and dust masks | |
Rossettie et al. | Effectiveness of manufactured surgical masks, respirators, and home-made masks in prevention of respiratory infection due to airborne microorganisms | |
De Silva et al. | Masks in COVID-19: let’s unmask the evidence | |
Robinson et al. | How effective are face coverings in reducing transmission of COVID-19? | |
Board on Health Sciences Policy et al. | Reusability of facemasks during an influenza pandemic: facing the flu | |
Li et al. | Wearing time and respiratory volume affect the filtration efficiency of masks against aerosols at different sizes | |
Lo | Home-made masks with filtration efficiency for nano-aerosols for community mitigation of COVID-19 pandemic |