[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Hervé, 2018 - Google Patents

Breeding for insect resistance in oilseed rape: Challenges, current knowledge and perspectives

Hervé, 2018

View PDF
Document ID
1797619791415969639
Author
Hervé M
Publication year
Publication venue
Plant Breeding

External Links

Snippet

Dealing with insect pests is one of the biggest challenges facing the cultivation of oilseed rape (Brassica napus, OSR). Insect pests are usually controlled using insecticides, but the increasing occurrence of insecticide‐resistant populations and the socio‐economic context …
Continue reading at onlinelibrary.wiley.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICRO-ORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING OR MAINTAINING MICRO-ORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8286Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for insect resistance

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hervé Breeding for insect resistance in oilseed rape: Challenges, current knowledge and perspectives
Smith Plant resistance to arthropods: molecular and conventional approaches
Weintraub et al. Insect vectors of phytoplasmas
O'Callaghan et al. Effects of plants genetically modified for insect resistance on nontarget organisms
Yu et al. Risk assessment and ecological effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis crops on non‐target organisms F
Arpaia et al. Assessing environmental impacts of genetically modified plants on non-target organisms: the relevance of in planta studies
Chaudhary Plant domestication and resistance to herbivory
Yu et al. Expression of Cry1Ac in transgenic Bt soybean lines and their efficiency in controlling lepidopteran pests
Lawo et al. Indian Bt cotton varieties do not affect the performance of cotton aphids
US9974302B2 (en) Pesticidal toxin active against coleopteran and/or hemipteran insects
Paul et al. Natural insecticidal proteins, the promising bio-control compounds for future crop protection
BR112013025834B1 (en) RECOMBINANT NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULE ENCODING PESTICIDE PROTEIN, INSECT-INHIBITING COMPOSITION, AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A PESTS OF LEPIDOPTER AND/OR HEMIPTERA SPECIES
Tian et al. Using resistant prey demonstrates that Bt plants producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Cry1F have no negative effects on Geocoris punctipes and Orius insidiosus
Poppy et al. Can biological control benefit from genetically‐modified crops? Tritrophic interactions on insect‐resistant transgenic plants
Chen et al. Genetic, molecular and genomic basis of rice defense against insects
Singh et al. Maize diversity for fall armyworm resistance in a warming world
Ba et al. An assessment of the risk of Bt-cowpea to non-target organisms in West Africa
Kang et al. Infection of powdery mildew reduces the fitness of grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) through restricted nutrition and induced defense response in wheat
Zhang et al. Expression of Bt-Cry3A in transgenic Populus alba× P. glandulosa and its effects on target and non-target pests and the arthropod community
Ullah et al. Temporal expression of Cry1Ab/c protein in Bt-cotton varieties, their efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and population dynamics of sucking arthropods on them
Niu et al. Transgenic Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac/Cry2Ab or Cry1Ac/EPSPS does not affect the plant bug Adelphocoris suturalis or the pollinating beetle Haptoncus luteolus
Yuan et al. Development of near-isogenic lines in a parthenogenetically reproduced thrips species, Frankliniella occidentalis
CN107849571A (en) Novel insect suppresses albumen
Akhtar et al. Impacts of six Bt rice lines on nontarget rice feeding thrips under laboratory and field conditions
Kaur Risk assessment of Bt transgenic crops