Birch et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Fast test suite-driven model-based fault localisation with application to pinpointing defects in student programsBirch et al., 2019
View HTML- Document ID
- 17738344741959390611
- Author
- Birch G
- Fischer B
- Poppleton M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Software & Systems Modeling
External Links
Snippet
Fault localisation, ie the identification of program locations that cause errors, takes significant effort and cost. We describe a fast model-based fault localisation algorithm that, given a test suite, uses symbolic execution methods to fully automatically identify a small …
- 230000004807 localization 0 title abstract description 175
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3676—Test management for coverage analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3608—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs using formal methods, e.g. model checking, abstract interpretation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
- G06F17/504—Formal methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3604—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3612—Software analysis for verifying properties of programs by runtime analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/362—Software debugging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30286—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor in structured data stores
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/40—Transformations of program code
- G06F8/41—Compilation
- G06F8/43—Checking; Contextual analysis
- G06F8/436—Semantic checking
- G06F8/437—Type checking
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/57—Certifying or maintaining trusted computer platforms, e.g. secure boots or power-downs, version controls, system software checks, secure updates or assessing vulnerabilities
- G06F21/577—Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wang et al. | Automatic generation of acceptance test cases from use case specifications: an nlp-based approach | |
Messer et al. | Automated grading and feedback tools for programming education: A systematic review | |
Gulwani et al. | Feedback generation for performance problems in introductory programming assignments | |
Kneuss et al. | Synthesis modulo recursive functions | |
Galeotti et al. | TACO: Efficient SAT-based bounded verification using symmetry breaking and tight bounds | |
Srikanth et al. | Complexity verification using guided theorem enumeration | |
Mongiovi et al. | Detecting overly strong preconditions in refactoring engines | |
Henkel et al. | Shipwright: A human-in-the-loop system for dockerfile repair | |
Ahmed et al. | Learning lenient parsing & typing via indirect supervision | |
Itzhaky et al. | On the automated verification of web applications with embedded SQL | |
Alenazi et al. | SysML modeling mistakes and their impacts on requirements | |
Birch et al. | Fast test suite-driven model-based fault localisation with application to pinpointing defects in student programs | |
Gao et al. | Program repair | |
Bonakdarpour et al. | Program repair for hyperproperties | |
Chamarthi et al. | Automated specification analysis using an interactive theorem prover | |
Ringert et al. | Abstract alloy instances | |
Brown et al. | Software testing | |
Grindal | Handling combinatorial explosion in software testing | |
Hua et al. | A sketching-based approach for debugging using test cases | |
Wang et al. | WheaCha: A method for explaining the predictions of models of code | |
Sinha et al. | HOTTest: A model-based test design technique for enhanced testing of domain-specific applications | |
De Moura et al. | Bugs, moles and skeletons: Symbolic reasoning for software development | |
Ahmad | New strategies for automated random testing | |
Daka | Improving readability in automatic unit test generation | |
Nguyen et al. | A Graph Analysis Based Approach for Specification-Driven Testing of Model Transformations |