Garcia et al., 2023 - Google Patents
SpeedCAP: an efficient method for estimating neural activation patterns using electrically evoked compound action-potentials in cochlear implant usersGarcia et al., 2023
View HTML- Document ID
- 17035611943575346803
- Author
- Garcia C
- Deeks J
- Goehring T
- Borsetto D
- Bance M
- Carlyon R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Ear and Hearing
External Links
Snippet
Objectives: Electrically evoked compound action-potentials (ECAPs) can be recorded using the electrodes in a cochlear implant (CI) and represent the synchronous responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. ECAPs can be obtained using a forward-masking …
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0402—Electrocardiography, i.e. ECG
- A61B5/0452—Detecting specific parameters of the electrocardiograph cycle
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
- A61B5/0531—Measuring skin impedance
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/7225—Details of analog processing, e.g. isolation amplifier, gain or sensitivity adjustment, filtering, baseline or drift compensation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
- A61B5/4076—Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Garcia et al. | SpeedCAP: an efficient method for estimating neural activation patterns using electrically evoked compound action-potentials in cochlear implant users | |
Garcia et al. | The panoramic ECAP method: estimating patient-specific patterns of current spread and neural health in cochlear implant users | |
Prendergast et al. | Effects of age and noise exposure on proxy measures of cochlear synaptopathy | |
Coffey et al. | Cortical correlates of the auditory frequency-following and onset responses: EEG and fMRI evidence | |
Giraud et al. | Imaging plasticity in cochlear implant patients | |
Potts et al. | Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T-and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients | |
Hu et al. | Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implants | |
Botros et al. | Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting | |
Hughes et al. | Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: Data from human cochlear-implant recipients | |
Jahn et al. | Evaluating psychophysical polarity sensitivity as an indirect estimate of neural status in cochlear implant listeners | |
Undurraga et al. | Polarity effects on neural responses of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve at different cochlear sites | |
van de Heyning et al. | Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation | |
Hughes et al. | Effects of stimulus polarity and artifact reduction method on the electrically evoked compound action potential | |
Skidmore et al. | Prediction of the functional status of the cochlear nerve in individual cochlear implant users using machine learning and electrophysiological measures | |
Hey et al. | Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode | |
Jahn et al. | Electrophysiological estimates of the electrode–neuron interface differ between younger and older listeners with cochlear implants | |
Jahn et al. | Polarity sensitivity in pediatric and adult cochlear implant listeners | |
Lundin et al. | Prognostic value of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implantation | |
Bierer et al. | A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant array | |
Brochier et al. | Interpreting the effect of stimulus parameters on the electrically evoked compound action potential and on neural health estimates | |
Dong et al. | Speech perception performance in cochlear implant recipients correlates to the number and synchrony of excited auditory nerve fibers derived from electrically evoked compound action potentials | |
Kim et al. | Recovery function of electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children with auditory neuropathy: preliminary results | |
Mesnildrey et al. | Impedance measures for a better understanding of the electrical stimulation of the inner ear | |
Raghunandhan et al. | A clinical study of electrophysiological correlates of behavioural comfort levels in cochlear implantees | |
Miller et al. | Canonical Response Parameterization: Quantifying the structure of responses to single-pulse intracranial electrical brain stimulation |