Compton III, 1996 - Google Patents
Comparison of turbulence models for nozzle-afterbody flows with propulsive jetsCompton III, 1996
View PDF- Document ID
- 17025782582952321401
- Author
- Compton III W
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
A numerical investigation was conducted to assess the accuracy of two turbulence models when computing non-axisymmetric nozzle-afterbody flows with propulsive jets. Navier- Stokes solutions were obtained for a Convergent-divergent non-axisymmetric nozzle …
- 230000001141 propulsive 0 title abstract description 7
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies
- Y02T50/67—Relevant aircraft propulsion technologies
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
- Y02T50/10—Drag reduction
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Deere et al. | A computational study of a dual throat fluidic thrust vectoring nozzle concept | |
Ding et al. | An airframe/inlet integrated full-waverider vehicle design using as upgraded aerodynamic method | |
Compton III | Comparison of turbulence models for nozzle-afterbody flows with propulsive jets | |
RIZK et al. | Numerical prediction of the unsteady flowfield around the F-18 aircraft at large incidence | |
Cenko et al. | PAN AIR applications to weapons carriage and separation | |
Kim et al. | Optimal inlet shape design of N2B hybrid wing body configuration | |
Flores et al. | Zonal Navier-Stokes methodology for flow simulation about a completeaircraft | |
RIZK et al. | Numerical investigation of tail buffet on F-18 aircraft | |
Angel et al. | Validation of Immersed Boundary Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulations with F-16XL Flight Data | |
Engblom | Numerical Prediction of SERN Performance using WIND code | |
Weber et al. | Three-dimensional solution of flows over wings with leading-edge vortex separation | |
Rizk et al. | Unsteady simulation of viscous flowfield around F-18 aircraft at large incidence | |
Pomeroy et al. | Sensitivity of Space Launch System Low-Speed Aerodynamic CFD Results to Kestrel Flow Solver Inputs | |
Ghaffari et al. | Navier-Stokes solutions about the F/A-18 forebody-LEX configuration | |
Stauffer et al. | A History and Commentary on Thrust/Drag Bookkeeping | |
Baysal et al. | Interference flows past cylinder-fin-sting-cavity assemblies | |
William B. Compton | Comparison of Turbulence Models for Nozzle-Afterbody Flows With Propulsive Jets | |
Long | Off-design performance of hypersonic waveriders | |
Li et al. | Integration of Engine, Plume, and CFD Analyses in Conceptual Design of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft | |
Pandya et al. | Validation of inlet and exhaust boundary conditions for a Cartesian method | |
Malan et al. | Inlet drag prediction for aircraft conceptual design | |
Huband et al. | Numerical Simulation of an F-16A at Angle of Attack | |
Bui | Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Nozzle Plume Effects on Sonic Boom Signature | |
Fornasier | Treatment of supersonic configurations by an updated low-order panelmethod | |
Shankar et al. | Full potential methods for analysis/design of complex aerospace configurations |