Scafoglieri et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Prediction of segmental lean mass using anthropometric variables in young adultsScafoglieri et al., 2012
View PDF- Document ID
- 16997932942894489305
- Author
- Scafoglieri A
- Tresignie J
- Provyn S
- Marfell-Jones M
- Reilly T
- Bautmans I
- Clarys J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of sports sciences
External Links
Snippet
The aim of the present study was to develop and cross-validate anthropometrical prediction equations for segmental lean tissue mass (SLM). One hundred and seventeen young healthy Caucasians (67 men and 50 women; mean age: 31.9±10.0 years; Body Mass Index …
- 210000001519 tissues 0 abstract description 37
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
- A61B5/4869—Determining body composition
- A61B5/4872—Body fat
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/3431—Calculating a health index for the patient, e.g. for risk assessment
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/055—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves involving electronic or nuclear magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Scafoglieri et al. | Prediction of segmental lean mass using anthropometric variables in young adults | |
Santos et al. | Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes | |
Ackland et al. | Current status of body composition assessment in sport: review and position statement on behalf of the ad hoc research working group on body composition health and performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commission | |
Clark et al. | Association between components of body composition and scoliosis: a prospective cohort study reporting differences identifiable before the onset of scoliosis | |
Chomtho et al. | Evaluation of arm anthropometry for assessing pediatric body composition: evidence from healthy and sick children | |
Gómez-Cabello et al. | Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in the elderly EXERNET multi-centre study | |
Prins et al. | Use of bioelectrical impedance analysis to assess body composition in rural Gambian children | |
Kawakami et al. | Development and validation of a simple anthropometric equation to predict appendicular skeletal muscle mass | |
Chung | Body composition analysis and references in children: clinical usefulness and limitations | |
Salamat et al. | Anthropometric predictive equations for estimating body composition | |
van der Scheer et al. | Assessment of body composition in spinal cord injury: A scoping review | |
Valente-dos-Santos et al. | Allometric modelling of peak oxygen uptake in male soccer players of 8–18 years of age | |
Kahn et al. | Indicators of abdominal size relative to height associated with sex, age, socioeconomic position and ancestry among US adults | |
Machado et al. | The multicomponent anthropometric model for assessing body composition in a male pediatric population: a simultaneous prediction of fat mass, bone mineral content, and lean soft tissue | |
D’Hondt et al. | Bioelectrical impedance analysis as a means of quantifying upper and lower limb asymmetry in youth elite tennis players: An explorative study | |
Powers et al. | Long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements and association with their covariates | |
Chen et al. | Trunk skeletal muscle mass and phase angle measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis are associated with the chance of femoral neck fracture in very elderly people | |
Demura et al. | Prediction of visceral fat area at the umbilicus level using fat mass of the trunk: The validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis | |
Lyra et al. | Prediction equations for fat and fat-free body mass in adolescents, based on body circumferences | |
Simões et al. | Predictive equations for estimating regional body composition: a validation study using DXA as criterion and associations with cardiometabolic risk factors | |
Carvalho et al. | Agreement between anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessments of lower-limb volumes and composition estimates in youth-club rugby athletes | |
Scafoglieri et al. | Accuracy and concordance of anthropometry for measuring regional fat distribution in adults aged 20–55 years | |
Demmer et al. | Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry compared with anthropometry in relation to cardio-metabolic risk factors in a young adult population: Is the ‘Gold Standard’Tarnished? | |
Azuma et al. | Maintenance of the paraspinal muscles may protect against radiographic knee osteoarthritis | |
Cataldi et al. | Accuracy and precision of multiple body composition methods and associations with muscle strength in athletes of varying hydration: The Da Kine Study |