Max et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Limited pre-speech auditory modulation in individuals who stutter: Data and hypothesesMax et al., 2019
View PDF- Document ID
- 16897590802334570494
- Author
- Max L
- Daliri A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
External Links
Snippet
Purpose We review and interpret our recent series of studies investigating motor-to-auditory influences during speech movement planning in fluent speakers and speakers who stutter. In those studies, we recorded auditory evoked potentials in response to probe tones …
- 206010054964 Dysphemia 0 title abstract description 133
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/36014—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes
- A61N1/36025—External stimulators, e.g. with patch electrodes for treating a mental or cerebral condition
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
- A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
- A61B5/04845—Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/165—Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
- A61B5/486—Bio-feedback
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
- A61B5/4076—Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Max et al. | Limited pre-speech auditory modulation in individuals who stutter: Data and hypotheses | |
Strait et al. | Musical experience and neural efficiency–effects of training on subcortical processing of vocal expressions of emotion | |
Evans et al. | Getting the cocktail party started: masking effects in speech perception | |
Niziolek et al. | What does motor efference copy represent? Evidence from speech production | |
Zheng et al. | Functional overlap between regions involved in speech perception and in monitoring one's own voice during speech production | |
Shtyrov et al. | Grammar processing outside the focus of attention: an MEG study | |
Zhang et al. | Neural coding of formant‐exaggerated speech in the infant brain | |
Möttönen et al. | Using TMS to study the role of the articulatory motor system in speech perception | |
Wilsch et al. | What works in auditory working memory? A neural oscillations perspective | |
Liang et al. | Musicians are better than non-musicians in frequency change detection: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence | |
Li et al. | Cerebellar contribution to auditory feedback control of speech production: Evidence from patients with spinocerebellar ataxia | |
Cuellar et al. | Mu suppression as an index of sensorimotor contributions to speech processing: evidence from continuous EEG signals | |
Li et al. | Corollary discharge versus efference copy: distinct neural signals in speech preparation differentially modulate auditory responses | |
Daliri et al. | Compensatory responses to formant perturbations proportionally decrease as perturbations increase | |
Parkinson et al. | Modulation of effective connectivity during vocalization with perturbed auditory feedback | |
Ito et al. | Temporal factors affecting somatosensory–auditory interactions in speech processing | |
Sun et al. | Complex linguistic rules modulate early auditory brain responses | |
Onojima et al. | Ongoing slow oscillatory phase modulates speech intelligibility in cooperation with motor cortical activity | |
Goncalves et al. | Auditory processing of speech and non-speech stimuli in children who stutter: electrophysiological evidences | |
Wikman et al. | Brain activity during shadowing of audiovisual cocktail party speech, contributions of auditory–motor integration and selective attention | |
Kapsner-Smith et al. | Test–Retest Reliability of Behavioral Assays of Feedforward and Feedback Auditory–Motor Control of Voice and Articulation | |
Max et al. | This is the Accepted Manuscript version of an article published by ASHA in 2019 in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62 (8S), 3071-3084. Available online | |
Malone et al. | Neural basis of learning to perceive speech through touch using an acoustic-to-vibrotactile speech sensory substitution | |
Uppenkamp | Functional neuroimaging in hearing research and audiology | |
Gohari et al. | Neural correlates of concurrent sound perception: A review and guidelines for future research |