Ball et al., 1998 - Google Patents
Modeling of the pliant surfaces of the thigh and leg during gaitBall et al., 1998
- Document ID
- 16787501134864307385
- Author
- Ball K
- Pierrynowski M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Laser-Tissue Interaction IX
External Links
Snippet
Rigid Body Modeling, a 6 degree of freedom (DOF) method, provides state of the art human movement analysis, but with one critical limitation; it assumes segment rigidity. A non-rigid 12 DOF method, Pliant Surface Modeling (PSM) was developed to model the simultaneous …
- 210000000689 upper leg 0 title abstract description 31
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/107—Measuring physical dimensions, e.g. size of the entire body or parts thereof
- A61B5/1077—Measuring of profiles
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/053—Measuring electrical impedance or conductance of a portion of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
- A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning
- A61B5/0064—Body surface scanning
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/02—Prostheses implantable into the body
- A61F2/30—Joints
- A61F2/3094—Designing or manufacturing processes
- A61F2/30942—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques
- A61F2002/30952—Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques using CAD-CAM techniques or NC-techniques
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/70—Means for positioning the patient in relation to the detecting, measuring or recording means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/50—Clinical applications
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Leardini et al. | Kinematic models of lower limb joints for musculo-skeletal modelling and optimization in gait analysis | |
Leardini et al. | A new anatomically based protocol for gait analysis in children | |
Cappello et al. | Soft tissue artifact compensation in knee kinematics by double anatomical landmark calibration: performance of a novel method during selected motor tasks | |
Scheys et al. | Level of subject-specific detail in musculoskeletal models affects hip moment arm length calculation during gait in pediatric subjects with increased femoral anteversion | |
Mündermann et al. | The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications | |
Della Croce et al. | Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry: Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics | |
Stagni et al. | Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects | |
Leardini et al. | Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location | |
Ehrig et al. | A survey of formal methods for determining functional joint axes | |
Fiorentino et al. | Accuracy of functional and predictive methods to calculate the hip joint center in young non-pathologic asymptomatic adults with dual fluoroscopy as a reference standard | |
Cerveri et al. | Robust recovery of human motion from video using Kalman filters and virtual humans | |
Acker et al. | Accuracy of single-plane fluoroscopy in determining relative position and orientation of total knee replacement components | |
Kuo et al. | Influence of soft tissue artifacts on the calculated kinematics and kinetics of total knee replacements during sit-to-stand | |
Scheys et al. | Calculating gait kinematics using MR-based kinematic models | |
Passmore et al. | Defining the medial-lateral axis of an anatomical femur coordinate system using freehand 3D ultrasound imaging | |
Sauret et al. | On the use of knee functional calibration to determine the medio-lateral axis of the femur in gait analysis: Comparison with EOS biplanar radiographs as reference | |
Ball et al. | Modeling of the pliant surfaces of the thigh and leg during gait | |
Kepple et al. | Assessment of a method to estimate muscle attachments from surface landmarks: a 3D computer graphics approach | |
Della Croce et al. | Femoral anatomical frame: assessment of various definitions | |
Metcalf et al. | Quantifying soft tissue artefacts and imaging variability in motion capture of the fingers | |
Chin et al. | A marker-based mean finite helical axis model to determine elbow rotation axes and kinematics in vivo | |
Kuo et al. | Feasibility of using surface markers for assessing motion of the thumb trapeziometacarpal joint | |
Jia et al. | CAT & MAUS: A novel system for true dynamic motion measurement of underlying bony structures with compensation for soft tissue movement | |
Wang et al. | Image based weighted center of proximity versus directly measured knee contact location during simulated gait | |
Fohanno et al. | Improvement of upper extremity kinematics estimation using a subject-specific forearm model implemented in a kinematic chain |