Jerrett et al., 2007 - Google Patents
Modeling the intraurban variability of ambient traffic pollution in Toronto, CanadaJerrett et al., 2007
View PDF- Document ID
- 16622026549205619268
- Author
- Jerrett M
- Arain M
- Kanaroglou P
- Beckerman B
- Crouse D
- Gilbert N
- Brook J
- Finkelstein N
- Finkelstein M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A
External Links
Snippet
The objective of this paper is to model determinants of intraurban variation in ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in Toronto, Canada, with a land use regression (LUR) model. Although researchers have conducted similar studies in Europe, this work …
- JCXJVPUVTGWSNB-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen dioxide O=[N]=O 0 abstract description 22
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30861—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups
- G01C21/20—Instruments for performing navigational calculations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/0004—Gaseous mixtures, e.g. polluted air
- G01N33/0009—General constructional details of gas analysers, e.g. portable test equipment
- G01N33/0073—Control unit therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups
- G01C21/26—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups specially adapted for navigation in a road network
- G01C21/28—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups specially adapted for navigation in a road network with correlation of data from several navigational instruments
- G01C21/30—Map- or contour-matching
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electro-chemical, or magnetic means
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G09—EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
- G09B—EDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
- G09B29/00—Maps; Plans; Charts; Diagrams, e.g. route diagram
- G09B29/003—Maps
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01W—METEOROLOGY
- G01W1/00—Meteorology
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Jerrett et al. | Modeling the intraurban variability of ambient traffic pollution in Toronto, Canada | |
Shukla et al. | Mapping spatial distribution of particulate matter using Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting at supersites of megacity Delhi | |
Bertazzon et al. | Accounting for spatial effects in land use regression for urban air pollution modeling | |
Wang et al. | Global gridded GDP data set consistent with the shared socioeconomic pathways | |
Jerrett et al. | A review and evaluation of intraurban air pollution exposure models | |
Sahsuvaroglu et al. | A land use regression model for predicting ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada | |
Rosenlund et al. | Comparison of regression models with land-use and emissions data to predict the spatial distribution of traffic-related air pollution in Rome | |
Rivera-González et al. | An assessment of air pollutant exposure methods in Mexico City, Mexico | |
Kanaroglou et al. | Estimation of sulfur dioxide air pollution concentrations with a spatial autoregressive model | |
Poplawski et al. | Intercity transferability of land use regression models for estimating ambient concentrations of nitrogen dioxide | |
Yu et al. | Deep ensemble machine learning framework for the estimation of PM 2.5 concentrations | |
Oda et al. | On the impact of granularity of space-based urban CO2 emissions in urban atmospheric inversions: A case study for Indianapolis, IN | |
Alam et al. | Exploring the modeling of spatiotemporal variations in ambient air pollution within the land use regression framework: Estimation of PM10 concentrations on a daily basis | |
Hamed et al. | Predicting PM2. 5 levels over the north of Iraq using regression analysis and geographical information system (GIS) techniques | |
Zou et al. | An optimized spatial proximity model for fine particulate matter air pollution exposure assessment in areas of sparse monitoring | |
Fang et al. | Personal real-time air pollution exposure assessment methods promoted by information technological advances | |
Bezyk et al. | Gis-based approach to spatio-temporal interpolation of atmospheric co2 concentrations in limited monitoring dataset | |
Gulliver et al. | Back-extrapolated and year-specific NO2 land use regression models for Great Britain-Do they yield different exposure assessment? | |
Hassanpour Matikolaei et al. | Characterizing the effect of traffic density on ambient CO, NO2, and PM2. 5 in Tehran, Iran: an hourly land-use regression model | |
Kumar et al. | Spatio-temporal assessment of urban environmental conditions in Ranchi Township, India using remote sensing and geographical information system techniques | |
Maantay et al. | Loose-coupling an air dispersion model and a geographic information system (GIS) for studying air pollution and asthma in the Bronx, New York City | |
Osses et al. | Analysis and evolution of air quality monitoring networks using combined statistical information indexes | |
Fattoruso et al. | Site suitability analysis for low cost sensor networks for urban spatially dense air pollution monitoring | |
Yu et al. | An assessment of air-quality monitoring station locations based on satellite observations | |
Blanco et al. | Impact of mobile monitoring network design on air pollution exposure assessment models |